Barack Obama's Women -- Ugly Women
Through and Through:
Facts, Information, and Opinion
(A Lesson for Hoped-to-Be Men)
Victor Edward Swanson,
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
The United States of America
copyright c. 2013
February 4, 2013
Since late 2008, I have been doing research on Barack Hussein Obama, listening to Barack Obama, and posting documents about Barack Hussein Obama on the Internet at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, and I have been regularly increasing the length of many of the documents and reposting them at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, and the documents show the type of man that Barack Obama is. One document--Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama--shows how much Barack Obama lies, and a person who regularly lies is a defective man and a man not to be trusted, and other documents, such as THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", show the bad nature of Barack Obama by showing who he associates with, such as tax cheats and lovers of Mao (the former Chinese dictator--a communist--who killed millions and millions of Chinese in the 1900s), and, ultimately, when a person reads the documents about Barack Hussein Obama that exist at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, that person can understand unmistakably that Barack Obama Hussein is an "enslavist," who is a person who wishes to be nothing else in life than a ruler, who puts his own life above others, and who wishes to be serviced and treated as a king. Here--through his document--I show another side of Barack Hussein Obama, and what I do with this document is show the type of women that Barack Hussein Obama wishes to have around him, and I show how he likes to have ugly women are around him, and I contrast Barack Hussein Obama's choice of women, which will probably gag you, with women that I find not ugly, and I give you my choices so that you can see a stark difference between the mind of Barack Hussein Obama and my mind with respect to women and better see the nature of Barack Hussein Obama's mind, which is bad.
Before I can present facts and give any commentary or opinions and even suppositions, I have to pass along some rules of nature and rules of man. Since you are reading and seeing this document, you are alive, and sometime in the future, you will die, and death may come through accident, disease, or body breakdown through use and age. Since you are alive, you may mate--have sexual intercourse--and create a child, and you will be, in essence, one of two creators of that child, and no one else can take credit for being a creator of the child, as only two persons--your mother and your father--can be considered the direct creators of you, and no one--other than your mother and your father--can claim to be the owner of you, and, really, even your mother and father are not owners of you in the long run, and, certainly, no person really can claim ownership of you, and in the long run, you are not forever the owner of any child that you might produce. Ultimately, I can say that you can own no one else and no person or government can own you and has no right related to nature to own you.
This document is set up with fourteen woman who are tied to Barack Obama, and I could have listed more, but I set a restriction on the size of the file (in bytes); for example, I could have also talked about Preeta Bansal (who has been General Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor at the Office of Management and Budget), Melody Barnes (who has been the Director of the Domestic Policy Council and has ties to the Center for American Progress (as a vice president), which is a socialistic entity), Dawn Johnson (who has been Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), and Cecilia Munoz (who has been the Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Executive Office of the President). How the document is set up is I present a woman tied to Barack Obama and show why the woman is ugly, and then I show a photograph of a woman who I like and make comments, which may or may not be associated directly with the woman, and I show the women who I like to cleanse my mind f the ugliness of Barack Obama's women. This document is an adult-issue document, and the document is document to teach about woman and to especially teach men about women who are ugly, though promoted as not ugly by many in the main media.
This woman, who was born in 1955, is at a minimum a socialist who pushes the faux idea of manmade global warming or manmade climate change, which, I can argue, was sparked by the book written by Saul Alinsky--a radical and communist--entitled Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, which was published in 1971 and which pushed the idea of having radical revolutionaries push people into believing in a saving-the-planet movement so that industry could be completely controlled by government. In January 2009, Carol Browner, who had already been the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (from 1993 to 2001), was made the "Climate Czar" for Barack Obama or made the person in charge of the Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy, a position that she held till March 2011. Her history shows ties to socialistic entities, such as "Socialist International," which has pushed the idea of "global governance" (or what could be thought of as the idea of one country encompassing the world) and which has pushed the idea of destroying rich countries through climate-related laws, which limit and restrict what industries, such as the coal industry, can do, as has been happening through the work of the Barack Obama administration.
Yes, Carol Browner is an ugly woman because of her mind. Yet, Carol Browner is one type of woman that Barack Obama likes, though not necessarily sexually, and it seems Barack Obama likes her because she promotes a big lie--manmade climate change. I can prove my statement. You are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this link: Carbon.
Now, I can see a problem could develop in your mind in the matter of whether or not Barack Obama's women are ugly, and the problem is you could be predisposed to admire the physical structure of the women or some of the women or at least one of the women, and, in fact, your mind might become stimulated upon seeing at least one of them (which I cannot relate to, since my mind blocks such a matter). That is a problem that I cannot solve. All that I can do is urge you to train your mind to shut down in relation to matters physical when you see a woman who has an evil mind, and, anyway, you are always very likely to come across another woman who is physically attractive to you and inspires you toward sexual intercourse and has a mind that is decent and good. A young man has to develop mental control in the matters related to mating and physical attraction--because survival and a good life over the long run depends on it.
A Woman Who I Like--Number One:
One example of the physical beauty of the woman, as I se it, is here, and it is the first of my fourteen examples of women whose physical stature I find wonderful. Of course, I am unaware of what they think and whether or not they know that all the woman that I present in this document that are tied to Barack Obama are hurting them or have it in their nature to hurt them. Of course, some of the women that I present in this document who I like might be communists or socialists and believe communism and socialism are good for the world. I have to forget about what the nature of their minds are till more information is available, but you have to admit, even if they are communists and socialists, they are currently not in a high-level positions in the federal government of the United States of America and can work to undermine The United States Constitution, as are the women who I present in this document who are tied to Barack Obama and who are doing what Barack Obama wishes or likes. Since this woman--called "A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number One"--is not in a high-level position in the federal government, she must do something probably, such as work for some type of business or company or corporation, but, then again, she may simply be a woman who wishes to be a mother and stay at home to raise children, which is honorable and commendable and worthwhile, and I say that it is much better for a woman who does not uphold the ways and socialism and communism to be highly involved in raising her children than for a woman to be indirectly involved in raising her children and have persons, such as government-related people, directly involved in raising her children, since the government-related persons can teach communism and socialism to the children regularly and created defective people, especially in this day and age, where, for one, some teachers are purposely pushing socialism and communism into the minds of children in their class rooms. [Note: You are urged to see my document entitled Lessons for Children about Politics and Dangerous People, which can be reached by using this link: Children.]
It is time to talk about corporations, companies, and businesses and what they cannot do to you. A business, company, or corporation can make money, but you do not have to buy what any of them sells, and although they make money by selling things, they can be avoided in this country, since the country is not a country in which only one business, company, or corporation makes things and you are forced to buy from them. Certainly, a business, company, or corporation cannot coerce you into buying something, and a business, company, or corporation has not the power to fine you, tax you, or imprison you for not agreeing to purchase. A government can fine you, tax you, and imprison you, if you do something that is against government rules or laws, and that is why there must be reins on the power that a federal government has--even the federal government of the United States of America. A business, company, or corporation--no matter how big it gets--will never get as big as the federal government of the United States of America and will never have the power that the federal government has to fine you, tax your, or imprison you. If you think a business, company, or corporation is a bad thing for simply being or existing, you had better come to realize that a federal government can be really bad, if the wrong type of people--"enslavists" (such as communists and socialists)--get to run it and become entrenched in it and can enact "enslavism" through rules and laws. [Note: To learn more about "enslavism," you are urged to see my document entitled Conservatives and The United States Constitution Versus Enslavers and Enslavism (or Communism, Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can be reached by using this link: Enslavism.]
The federal government has a unit called the U.S. Department of Commerce, and on August 1, 2011, this woman--Rebecca Blank--became the head of the department in an "acting" capacity. The position is not supposed to have anything to do with controlling the ways of commerce on a daily basis in the United States of America, such as b saying what can and cannot be made or sold, but this is a type of person would it seems believes other ways. The Barack Obama administration, to which Rebecca Blank belongs, is pushing the defective idea that the "Commerce Clause" of The United States Constitution allows the federal government to tell you what you can and cannot buy, and that is nonsense, if that were true the country would most certainly be a tyranny, but the creators of The United States Constitution did not create such as country (and evidence of that exists in writings, such as The Federalist Papers). Anyone who pushes or supports the idea that the "Commerce Clause" of The United States Constitution allows the federal government to tell any individual what that individual must buy is an evil person. [Explaining the true meaning of the "Commerce Clause" is beyond the scope of this document, and to learn more about the subject, you should see the book entitled Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto, which was written by Mark R. Levin and published in 2009.]
Ask yourself about but yourself--Would I want to live in a country in which the federal government could tell me what I had to buy from someone else or from a company or would I want to create and live a country in which the a politician could tell a person what the person had to buy from someone else or from a company?
I think the "feminist revolution" has been a bust! In essence, it got started in the 1960s in earnest, and how I see it is the "feminist revolution" has led to, for example, women acting like men and dressing like men, men becoming feminized, many women not being happy with their lives because they have had to live sort of like men or be like men, and women being almost chastised for acting feminine, such as wishing to be sexy in a standard feminine way. Rebecca Blank is a feminist, and I say that Rebecca Blank is an ugly woman.
The rules of economics apply to every person, no matter what the person's color is or race is or gender is, and, for example, if the world were made of only one race, the rules of economics would apply to the people of that race, as it would to another race. In 1993, Rebecca Blank was involved in providing material for a book entitled Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics (which was edited by Marianne A. Ferber and Julie A. Nelson), and, for one, the book suggested the economy has masculine biases and has to lose those biases. Rebecca Blank has been involved in other published pieces, such as the book entitled It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty. This woman seems to have a mission to end poverty in America, and although Democrats have proposed and enacted ways to end poverty since the early 1900s, such as the "New Deal" and "Fight on Poverty," poverty exists and will always exist in the world and in this country, because, for one, the nature of some men and some women is to do nothing. On September 25, 2008, Rebecca Blank spoke before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, and some of what she said is: "...This sluggishness on the part of the poverty rate reflects general sluggish growth income by all people in the bottom half of the income distribution. So those in the middle as well as at the bottom of the distribution have lower incomes in 2007 than they did in 2000. And, of course, if the 2007 data doesn't look as we might as hoped, 2008--I promise you--will look substantially worse, given the rapidly rising unemployment and the...economic news that's been dominating all of the newspapers. Poverty is going to be a major issue in the agenda of the next administration...." and "...In addition, we need to assure the presence of an effective safety net, helping in particular disconnected women with...neither working nor on welfare to be able to stabilize their incomes. We also need to make sure that unemployment insurance serves those who are without a job. Right now, it serves less than forty percent of them...." [Note: She spoke so fast that sometimes she stumbled in her delivery, and I could not understand several of her words, and when I think about how she talked fast, I think she was talking fast so that she could rattle off so much nonsense that much of it would be missed by listeners.] So, how well as the war on poverty by the "enslavists" (liars and tax cheats and black radicals) been going since at the 1960s and especially since Barack Obama became the U.S. President on January 20, 2011? In the summer of 2011, the Bureau of Labor Statistics--a unit of the federal government--reported that the general unemployment rate for blacks (or African-Americans) was running at about 16 or 17 percent and that the general unemployment rate for black teens was running around 40 percent (the "general unemployment" rate is not what is called the "U6" rate, which is a more complete look at unemployment), and, really, the unemployment rate is much higher than the figures that I list if you look at "U6" figures. Since the 1960s and since January 2011, enslavists in government have continued to produce legislation that has affected unnaturally with the rules of nature as they pertain to the rules of economics--you cannot simply take money from some people who make things and do things and lead to their increasing the number of jobs in the country and the overall wealth of the country. People get out of poverty by being able to work, and getting out of poverty does not happen over a few weeks or a few months--it takes years of work--and the Barack Obama political policies being pushed on the country are hurting the abilities of all types of people to create jobs, and that is fact.
Remember: The members of the Democratic Party--one of the two main political parties in the country--are known as "Democrats," and the word "Democratic" and the word "Democrats" have no real meaning related to "democracy" or being "democratic" in nature today, and the Democrats (who are really and are better defined as communists and socialists today) have been working to eliminate poverty in the country for decades, and the attempts to eliminate poverty have been a failure for the country, since the works to end poverty have not really been designed to increase employment--the programs have mostly been about spreading money around for the short term to make it seem that politicians within the Democratic Party are working to end poverty, especially for minorities, so that such politicians will be looked on as favorable in the minds of people, but their work is all fake, and evidence of the defective ideas of the Democrats can be seen by looking at big cities that have been controlled by Democrats for years, such as Detroit, which--as I report and can prove--is a dead city and will be for decades, since it takes decades to build a city. [To learn more about what Detroit is today, you are urged to see my document entitled Detroit and Death: A Future View of the United States of America, which can be reached by using this link: Detroit.]
Go back and look at the face of Rebecca Blank while thinking about what she stands for, and come to understand her ugliness and how to recognize ugliness.
Socialists and communists--or people with defective minds--believe or pretend to believe or try to persuade others to believe the country is tied to a "zero-sum game," which means there is, for example, only so much wealth in the country or so much money, and some people are hoarding it all, but that is a nonsense idea, as I shall show here, through a little story. Look at a village. The village is founded by someone, maybe starting out with grass huts as homes, and as time goes on, people build things or make assets by working and do things. In a while, the village will become known as a town as it grows, and the town in time will get houses that are more sturdy than grass huts are. Time goes on even more. More people are born or show up to live in the town, and more things--from houses to spoons to whatever--are made, and the wealth or assets of the town as a whole increases (though the wealth is not owned by the government of the town). The town gets bigger to the point where it is considered a city, and it has businesses of all types and it has what can be called industries. Meanwhile, all around the country other towns are growing, and towns are becoming cities. All the while, the value or wealth of the country is increasing. Not everyone is becoming rich, though, since it is not possible for everyone to be rich, but people are living and doing things and surviving, but a few people purposely are not working or doing things, such as because they are mentally ill or highly disabled or retired. The amount of wealth is not stagnant, and the amount of wealth is, generally speaking, increasing, though some things do wear out or get damaged or get destroyed. It is impossible for everyone to have exactly what everyone else has, especially when millions of persons are involved, and some people will have what might be called little, having not done much or not caring to have much. There is no such thing as a "zero-sum game" related to a country, unless the country is blown off the face of the planet or unless a few people in government restrict what can be made and who can make it and when they can make it so that those few people can be seen high in stature in the community based on how much they have.
Here is an aside:
Think of the world of toads, where toad eggs become pollywogs, and some grow faster than others do, and some die before every getting to mate, getting eaten or getting dried out by the sun by leaving the pond before ready to live on land, and a bunch of polliwogs become toads,
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number Two:
Okay, I have presented a pretty woman with blonde hair and now a present a pretty woman with dark hair, both of whom add pleasantness to my presentation, and this woman with dark hair gives my mind a break before I take up presenting a specific thought about "enslavists."
When I hear people talk about "liberals"--and they do not use the term "enslavists" as I do--they do not bring up a big force driving "enslavists," and I have to make the argument that "enslavists"--like Barack Obama--are driven by self-preservation to a fanatical degree, a degree that is so high they are willing to hurt others. For one, such persons wish not to be waitresses, plumbers, welders, painters, bricklayers, announcers, taxi drivers, gardeners, long-haul truckers, hairstylists, accountants, grade-school teachers, freighter captains, navigators, helicopter pilots, police officers, electrical engineers, X-ray technicians, doctors, high-wire walkers, football players, et cetera (I could go on a long time giving a list), and what they want to be are people who can control their world to protect themselves, and they especially want to control people around them--who they perceive might be harmful to them, such as by blocking them from being seen as the highest in stature in the community, which is one reason "enslavists" hate business owners, who often gain high stature in a community for doing things--creating companies and jobs and gaining money and assets--unlike "enslavists" who really have no ability to create jobs and companies and gain status in society for having done things and who, if they were not in government positions where they can affect people, would not really gain high stature in society, having no real skills and, maybe, having sick and defective minds, if not what could be called "radical minds," such as those that can be define as those of narcissists or megalomaniacs. Keep in mind--you need not be smart to be a high-level politician, since a person getting such a job can come through what can be called a "popularity contest"--an election--but it is not to say that all employees in government jobs are "enslavists." Combined with the main idea of self-preservation is the subordinant idea of getting money to live in the easiest way as possible, which can be done by being in government, where a person can do things in the world with other people's money.
Hillary Clinton is the wife of former U.S. President Bill Clinton, who while in the office of the U.S. Presidency, was impeached and put disgrace on the office for an affair with a young woman and for lying, and, in 2009, this woman became the U.S. Secretary of State, and no matter how much in the future this woman tries to persuade you she is anti-Barack Obama or not like Barack Obama, you should dismiss the persuasion as nonsense, since she has worked as a close associate of Barack Obama's and has accepted a job in the Barack Obama administration--like people work together. [You are urged to see my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document.]
Yes, Hillary Clinton is yet another ugly woman--a socialist at least and a woman who has pushed for a universal-health-care system for the country or a government-run health-care system for the country, especially in the early years of the Bill Clinton administration of the country, and the photograph does not show how frumpy and fat she is today, and the photograph does not hint well as to what is in her mind. On July 23, 2097, Hillary Clinton took part in a Democratic Party Presidential Debate on CNN (which was hosted by Anderson Cooper), and at one point during the debate, a person (a man) asked her if she was a "liberal," and Hillary Clinton said: "Rob, you know, it is, um, a word that, dah, originally meant, ah, that you were for freedom, that you were for the freedom to achieve, that you were willing to stand against big power and on behalf of the individual. Unfortunately, in the last, dah, thirty, forty years, it has been turned, ah, up on its head and made to seem as though it is a word that describes big government, totally contrary to what its, ah, meaning was in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. I prefer the word 'progressive,' which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the twentieth century. I consider myself a 'modern progressive,' someone who believes strongly individual rights and freedoms, who believes that we are better as a society when we're working together, and when we find ways to help those who may not have all the advantages in life get the tools they need to lead a more productive, ah, life for themselves and their families. So, I consider myself a proud modern American progressive, and I think that's the kind of, ah, philosophy and practice that we need to bring back to American politics." The quoted material shows what kind of mind that Hillary Clinton has, since the quotation is filled with lies about the true meanings of words and since she lied. It matters not to the discussion the original meaning of "liberal" and "progressive," but it is well known, except by stupid people or naive people, that today "progressive" is tied to communism and socialism, and it is well known as general knowledge that a "progressive" is a communist or socialist, who does not uphold, really, the rights of the individual and, especially in this country, the ways of The United States Constitution, which is, in essence, anti-socialism and anti-communism. A naive person, such as a young "black" in Detroit, who saw Hillary Clinton say the quoted material probably accepted her lies, such as the lie that America had communism and socialism as a driving force in the country years ago (as hinted in her line--"...philosophy and practice that we need to bring back to American politics...). Hillary Clinton talked about "big power" during her segment in which she answered Rob, but "big power" today is the federal government, which is bigger than any other entity in the country by far, and Barack Obama supports and promotes big government, an all-powerful government. The Democratic Party is not a political party based on promoting individual rights and such, and the actions of the Democrats in the U.S. Congress and Barack Obama over the last two years prove that. In addition, ask yourself--What did she mean by "those who may not have all the advantages in life"? I say that, basically, no one has all the advantages in life and that all persons have obstacles in their way, but I can say that Hillary Clinton was probably focusing on "blacks" in the big cities, such as in Detroit, where educational money has been wasted for decades, where black children have been given low standards by black adults, where poverty is nothing like what poverty is in a real Third World country (where people have no running water, have no brick houses, have no cars, have no big television sets, et cetera), and where blacks wish not to take up learning what they might call "white" stuff (such as proper English grammar and sentence structure and word usage). I say that, over the last five decades of so, "whites" are not the reason for blacks being so-called disadvantaged, except for some "white" who are Democrats, and a big reason for blacks being so-called disadvantaged is because of radical blacks, such as socialists, communists, and Nation of Islam members. In the quoted material, Hillary Clinton tried to redefine publicly what "progressives" and "progressivism" are today, and I could argue well Hillary Clinton was purposely working to enslave "blacks" by keeping them stupid about what "progressives" and "progressivism" have as meanings.
On May 27, 2009, The American Presidency Project posted words from Hillary Clinton, then a U.S. Senator and a person running to be the Democrat Party candidate for the U.S. Presidency. I first discovered the piece on October 1, 2011, and I found a number of comments that showed off what Hillary Clinton is about, and they showed her inner ugliness. Here is one portion of the piece: "...I believe that one of the most crucial jobs in the next president is to define a new vision of economic fairness and prosperity for the 21st century, a vision for how we insure greater opportunity for our next generation, and then to outline a strategy and then implement it. Today, I believe we need a new progressive vision for this new century. Now, I consider myself a thoroughly optimistic and modern progressive. I believe we can grow our economy in the face of global competition, and in a way that benefits all Americans. I believe we can curb the excess of the marketplace and provide more opportunities for more Americans to succeed. I believe we can support and promote smart trade policies that truly enforce strong labor and environmental standards...." This is Marxist--communist--talk! You can see her talk about "progressive vision" and "modern progressive," which are communistic themes. You can see she talked about "economic fairness and prosperity." Ask yourself--What is "economic fairness and prosperity " to Hillary Clinton? There is no way a person or a government can make everybody "economically" equal, except by taking everything from all the people and distributing it out, since people have different talents, and, in nature, people have different amounts of incentive to do things (for example, some people like to work eighteen hours a day, which a doctor may do, and some people wish to work as little as possible, though they are physically able). In addition, who sets the values of what is "equal" or who gets chosen to make the determination of what is equal or "fair"? Hillary Clinton talked about "excess in the marketplace." What is "excess in the marketplace"? Another defective idea from Hillary Clinton--the idea of people being blocked from succeeding--should make a person wonder--How have Americans been blocked from succeeding and by whom have they been blocked? Also, a government cannot guarantee anyone success, but it can through regulation block success. You should see how my analyzing her quotation results is showing off nonsense, and I could go on with more analysis, but it would be a waste of my time. Based on the quotation, I can say that commonsense about life is missing from Hillary Clinton's mind.
Yes, Hillary Clinton is truly an ugly woman because of her mind--a mind that pushes rotten thoughts and unrealistic thoughts, such as her thought that government should be active in determining what is fair and equal in life, though there has never been a society on Earth where everyone was economically equal, because it is an impossible goal to achieve.
[Note: On February 1, 2013, Hillary Clinton gave up her job as the U.S. Secretary of State, and she was replaced on that day by John Kerry (formerly a U.S. Senator (a Democrat related to Massachusetts)).]
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 3:
This woman is someone, and this woman has done things in her life so far, and this woman will probably do a lot over the years, and the odds are what she does will not affect me. She will probably have a number of days during which she is ill. She might get breast cancer, or she could end up with kidney disease, or she could be struck by a car and made a cripple. She will most likely get old. And she will die.
The world is a complex place where millions and millions of people are doing things all the day, and there are too many persons in the world for one person to control them and make the world better for them through government dictate, which is why a dictatorship government--or a highly centralized government--is always doomed to reach failure in a rather short period of time, though it can exist for decades, as I shall show here, and to begin, I note that a society with highly centralized government, like a communistic country, is nothing more than an "ant society," in which a few persons make the main decisions and rules for the society and the majority of the persons of the society are forced to be followers. An "ant-like society," which has limited goals and ultimately has limited achievable goals, can come about because individuals who believe they are super smart or the smartest in the society work to be in charge of the government and obtain the highest jobs in the government and who believe they can manage through their self-preceived super intelligence the society well and should be rewarded by having others service them as elites, and, of course, for a person to believe an individual can control well a society with millions of persons is a sign of high mental illness or insanity, because it is an impossible goal to achieve. The roots of failure in an "ant-like society" begin in minds of the so-called rulers, who, like all individuals, usually have minds trained in one main field of knowledge, such as law, and have a limited range or spread of general knowledge, so they do not understand the interaction of so many different aspects of life or the society, and because of that, they are poor in judging the effects or consequences of most of their decisions, if they even care about the true effects or consequences of their decisions at all. Over the history of the United States of America, the country has developed into a complex society with people doing so many different jobs and making so many different decisions about life in a given moment that no one mind can handle the complexity or perform the same function; for example, someone in Denver is doing things and making decisions about life, and someone in St. Louis is doing things and making decisions of about life, and someone in Anchorage is doing things and making decisions, and the number of cases that could be pointed out is some 300-plus million. Of course, in the United States of America, people will make good decisions and bad decisions, and most decisions will probably be at least adequate or worthwhile, and, certainly, some decisions will be big failures and lead to deaths, which happens in life, such as in car accidents and falls in bathtubs. Many of the decisions that are made are made--based on at least some information--about what to make or what to buy, and, in the case of buying, millions of persons are choosing from the many, many options that exist, and the options are ever-changing because products change and businesses come and go and businesses change their products and new technologies lead to changes, but some changes in products are bad decisions or some new technologies do not turn out to be good, though while in development, it looked as if they might be good, and it is over time that the results of new technologies are judged, and what people choose to buy affects what is made and how things are made, and all the while, makers of things are doing research about their products and developing their products in new ways, hoping to attract customers, and all the time, failure is possible, and success is possible. If there is an "ant-like society" structure, a few persons, using their, in truth, limited knowledge about the world, make decisions that are based on, in essence, a database of information that is so limited and so much smaller than the entire database tied to what can be millions of persons is that the possibilities for innovation are reduced, whether tied to innovations made by chance or by actual work and thinking. It does not take long for a society that adopts being an "ant-like society" from degrading or falling apart and devolving, and one reason for the failure is when a few minds making decisions for the many--millions and millions of persons--make bad decisions the errors affect millions and millions, unlike when millions and millions are making decisions, some of which will be good, most of which will be adequate, and some of which will be bad, which will be a smaller group of adversely affected people than the adversely affected people in the "ant-like society" is. It only takes a few decades or generations of for "ant-like society" to degrade to the point of becoming a dead society, which happens because bad practices become the norm and the effects of bad decisions become evident and results, and a good example of this thought is Detroit (Michigan), which started to really fall apart in the 1970s, when a racist mayor (Coleman Young, a black) supported the ways of communism, inspired hatred against "whites," and led the way of letting lawlessness rule the day (such as that of letting corruption and the misuse of taxpayer money rise in the city proper and in the school system). The "ant-like society" falls apart because disharmony rises in the general population, trapped by the results of bad decisions and because violence and coercion have to be used to control the general population, and disharmony rises in the general population because the general population loses the spirit to care for the self and take chances and try things and the general population loses the nature to care for the self and take chances and try things, having gained no experience in trying and failing or trying and succeeding. In addition, in the "ant-like society," the few who are the rulers usually try to push for making everyone equal so that there will not be jealousy within the community--no one will have more than anyone else, which will lead to an unrealistic world--but taking from those who do things leads to fewer people who do things, which leads to less innovation and less development, because thinking processes are depressed or the because the number of thinking people is reduced and because resources available for thinking people to use to try make to things are reduced.
It is logical that each person in the country can dislike something, but some persons dislike a lot of things, such as the Amendment in The United States Constitution that allows people to speak out publicly against politicians, but some people dislike or pretend to dislike what people have for religions, transportation (such as gasoline-based cars), et cetera, and when a few persons--by being politicians--can restrict people from having what they might not like--for whatever reasons--but are actually good for a society or liked by societies, the restrictions affect the society adversely by taking away jobs that could otherwise exist if the things could be made and taking away businesses that could be involved in making the things if the things were not restricted, and as more and more restrictions are set down in law and rules--based on the biases of a few persons--a society degrades more and more, since restricted things are not made and things related to the restricted things, such as new things, may not be made (you are urged to see how North Korea is doing today).
Note: The "ant society" is what the communist society and Sharia society. Such societies have a few elites who get serviced by the others and who can dictate the ways of the others. Such societies create little, since much time is spent by the rulers trying to control what elites in those societies are very likely to call the "masses."
Barack Obama put this woman in charge of White House communications in March 2009 (and she would be in the job till November 2009). On June 6, 2009, this woman made a statement that showed her defective nature, and what she said is that Mao Tse-Tung is one of her heroes. Mao Tse-Tung was a communist; Mao Tse-Tung was a dictator; Mao Tse-Tung killed millions of Chinese, who disliked his push for communism. Fortunately, Mao Tse-Tung is dead, and, fortunately, Anita Dunn's statement shows how ugly she is as a woman, and you have seen the statement, and yet Barack Obama seems to have high regard for her and such women. [Notice: Brian Williams of NBC News is in the background and probably is not put off by what Anita Dunn believes.]
So, you are aware that Anita Dunn promotes communists. On October 11, 2009, Anita Dunn appeared of a television program called Reliable Sources, which was shown by CNN, and one comment that she made is: "...The reality of it is that Fox News often operates almost either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party...." and "...But I think it's, it's fair to say about Fox--and certainly the way we view it--is that it really is more of a wing of the Republican Party...." NBC-TV, CNBC, and MSNBC are tied together through ownership, and they are highly "liberal" or are left-wing entities, and early in 2010, Anita Dunn began to be a contributor, having been hired on for what she is, for at least CNBC.
Yes, there is nothing more you need know about the woman to know the woman is ugly and has a truly ugly mind.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 4:
Let me get something over now. Not every woman who I like might look like a candidate for Playboy or the Miss America Pageant television special, but a woman not like women who might be in Playboy or on the Miss America Pageant can be more erotic than such women, if there is attitude to be a pleasant woman and she holds herself up with pride, and with that, she can do quite well in attracting the eyes of males. This woman who I like is not an ugly woman, and, in fact, she can be deemed quite erotic or can be called an "erotic" at least by the definitions that I have.
Of course, the "liberal" media will not promote this woman as an "erotic," but the "liberal" media will promote "liberal women," such as the "Obama" depicted in this document--Michelle Obama--as pretty or beautiful. It is up to men, especially young men, to resist the hype of the "liberal" media to promote the idea of such an such a "liberal" woman as beautiful or elegant. For example, around 2010 and 2011, television broadcast networks for their prime-time lineups seemed to be promoting that idea that beautiful or the standard of beauty was women who had no shape, such as no muscle tone, unlike the woman depicted in the photograph right above this paragraph, who seems to be very unlikely a woman who has adopted the nonsense of being a vegetarian and eating so light that she would look frail and weak and sickly, as can be seen in many young women who have bought into the nonsense of "liberal"-beauty trend setters. Now, does the woman presented in the photograph right above have a mind that makes her beautiful? The answer is unknown, as it is for all the other women that I find attractive and I present in this document. Yes, young men do have to resist the hype about beauty promoted by members of the "liberal " media, especially when the women being pushed as beautiful or pretty have minds that are highly ugly, such as by being supporters of "enslavism" or things like "Occupy Wall Street" (an event that started near Wall Street on September 17, 2011, and was being pushed along by socialists and communists and malcontents) Incidentally, notice the woman pictured right above this text looks as if she has done work with her body, which many women in this day and age seem to avoid.
Lisa Jackson is the head of the Environmental Protection Agency of the federal government, which has been affecting how businesses operate by setting down rules about how they may and may not manufacture things, especially since January 20, 2011, and it is something that should not happen, because it comes down to a few persons--"enslavists" in the form of politicans--dictating industrial policy or what types of businesses may or may not exist.
What a person truly believes can be hard to tell, since people can lie. For example, a person can say that the person believes man is hurting the planet by using fuels tied to carbon dioxide, but in truth, the person can know man's use of carbon dioxide is not causing what has become commonly called "manmade global warming" or "manmade climate change." The person simply says that man is hurting the planet by using fuels related to carbon dioxide so that the person can help evil people control the industrial industry of a country.
Lisa Jackson is proponent of manmade global warming or manmade climate change or pushes the idea that it is true that there is dangerous manmade global warming or manmade climate change!
It has been shown a number of ways that manmade global warming or manmade climate change is nonsense, and you can see evidence of that in my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this link: Carbon. For now, I report that in November 2010, the "Climategate" event showed the world that people involved in pushing the manmade global warming or manmade climate change were using fake data and manufacturing data, and, by the way, that data was being pushing on the world by the United Nations and by federal government officials in the United States of America, such as at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (or NOAA) or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (or NASA). In addition, I say for now that Al Gore's film Inconvenient Truth, which was released in 2006 and which has been shown to children in schools, has been shown to be a defective documentary, and other documentaries, some of which have been shown on PBS-associated stations, have pushed the defective ideas of those pushing on the world in the idea of manmade global warming or manmade climate change--one of whom is this ugly woman named Lisa Jackson.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 5:
Pleasantness and softness seem to be hard to find on the faces of many women today. Through the photograph presented in this section, you can image and feel warmth. Through the photograph, you can see the lusciousness of a woman who is not acting like a man or a non-woman.
Here is a woman that many men like me could be passionate about and can have compassion for, and this section deals with the idea "compassion" and "liberals." Regularly, "liberals" who are politicians will say that they are more compassionate than "conservatives" are, since only they really care for the needy, those who are out of work, the "worker," and jobs, and they use that nonsense claim, as I shall show, to convince as many people as possible to support them in elections and to push for this legislation or that legislation. Look at one case. Since the 1970s, Democrats--so-called "compassionate" people--have controlled the government of the City of Detroit, since then, several hundreds of thousands of people have left the city, which has been rife with corruption and mismanagement and has had racists in the form of blacks as mayors who purposely made "whites" the enemy in the eyes of blacks, and, today, Detroit is a dead city, having full unemployment that is well above twenty percent, and that is not compassion. Look at another case. In early 2009, Barack Obama and Democrats in the U.S. Congress pushed the idea that they had to put through a "stimulus" bill to create jobs as soon as possible, and what was put into law on February 17, 2009, is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which has turned out to be a sham of a law, and it cost the American taxpayer around one-thousand-billion dollars and increased the national debt, and since Barack Obama--a "liberal"--became the U.S. President on January 20, 2009, Barack Obama has increased the national debt by about five-thousand-billion dollars, and that is a debt burden put on the citizens of the country and citizens yet to be born in the country, and that is highly immoral and is not a sign of compassion, especially when millions of lives are involved.
There is no such thing as a "compassionate government," or it can be said that governments are not "compassionate" things. The government is a collection of people, each concerned mostly with their lives and the lives of some people closely tied to them, such as children, and the government is made up of a lot of people doing jobs, and they are following rules and laws--which can be changed regularly--and they treat people as numbers, and, generally speaking, a government does not see a person for what a person is--a living thing--and conflicting rules and laws can make a government conflicted. A government is not like your father or your mother--a government does not have that natural push to protect you right up to giving up life for you.
Here is another aside:
I have to explain nature and man here, and the explanation is tied to a story about the toad. Consider some thoughts about toads and how they grow up. An adult female toad lays eggs, and an adult male toad fertilizes the eggs, and the eggs grow to become polliwogs, though some eggs may be eaten by a creature or die before becoming polliwogs, and the polliwogs may or may not grow up to be toads (the pond in which they are growing could dry up, or animals could eat polliwogs, or polliwogs who have four legs and a tail could leave the pond too early and die from dehydration in the sun on a hot day, unable to return to the pond, which might be only a foot away from them). Toads will at one point will be fully toads, though not big, and will leave the pond and head for land, such as a wooded area. Some little toads might be attacked by ants and killed before they reach good hiding places and living places. If the toads find places to live, they could die because they cannot find enough food to eat. Then, winter can come, and some may die during the winter because they are stepped on by an animal, such as a deer or a bear. Someday, some toads may be involved in mating, but many probably will not be. That is life, and that idea fits all creatures, even man. [You are urged to see my document entitled Michigan Travel Tips #89 which shows my experience with toads, and to reach the document, you can use this link: Travel #89.]
Valerie Jarrett, who was born in Shiraz, Iran, is a close associate of Barack Obama's and has been for many years. She has been involved in Barack Obama election campaigning, and she has been a "special adviser" to Barack Obama, and Barack Obama picked her to be the Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs. [Keep in mind: In the summer of 2010, Barack Obama failed to show much support the election protesters in Iran and seemed to side with the rulers in Iran.]
Oh, Valerie Jarrett married William Robert Jarrett in 1983, and William Robert Jarrett's father, Vernon Jarrett, had been an associate of Frank Marshall Davis--a communist--who Barack Obama calls a "mentor"; for example, Vernon Jarrett and Frank Marshall Davis had worked together around 1940 in an entity known as Citizen's Committee to Aid Packing House Workers. Valerie Jarrett has been involved in helping Barack Obama pick people to work in his administration, such as Van Jones--a communist--who would be in the Barack Obama administration as the Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise, and Innovation from March 2009 to September 2009, when he was forced to resign because of past associations (in the past, Van Jones had created a communist entity known as "Green For All" and had written a book called The Green Collar Economy (published in 2008), and Van Jones has pushed the false idea of manmade global warming or manmade climate change, which has been shown to be a big lie, and he has ties to the Center for American Progress, a politically radical entity.
Let me show more related to Valerie Jarrett. First, here is a main idea of what an entity called "Netroots Nation" is about: "Netroots Nation amplifies progressive voices by providing an online and in-person campus for exchanging ideas and learning how to be more effective in using technology to influence the public debate. Through our annual convention and a series of region salons held throughout the year, we strengthen our community, inspire action and serve as an incubator for ideas that challenge the status quo and ultimately effect change in the public sphere...." Second, here is something that Van Jones said on a radio program called "Uprising Radio" in April 2008: "...Ah, one of the things that has happened I think too often to progressives is that, ah, we don't understand the relationship between minimum goals and maximum goal. Ah, right after Rosa Parks, ah, refused to give up her seat is the civil rights leaders had jumped out and said--Okay, now we want, ah, reparations for slavery, we want, ah, re, redistribution of all wealth, and we want to legalize mixed marriages. For that had been there, they came out with a maximum program the very next day, ah, they'd have been laughed at. Um, instead, they came out with a very minimum program--ah, you know, we just want to integrate these buses...." and "...We just want to sit at the lunch counter. But inside that minimum demands was a very radical kernel that eventually meant that from 1954 [to] 1958, you know, complete revolution was on the table, ah, for this country, and I think that this 'green movement' has to pursue those same steps in stages. Right now, we're saying--We want, ah, to move from suicidal gray capitalism to some kind of, ah, eco-capitalism, whe, where, ah, at least we're not, you know, fast tracking the destruction of the whole planet. Hum, will that be enough? No, it won't be enough. Ah, we want to go beyond excesses of exploitation and oppression all together, but that's a process. And I think what's great about, ah, the movement that's beginning to emerge is the crisis is so severe in terms of joblessness, violence, and now ecological threat that people are willing to be both very pragmatic and very visionary, and so, ah, the green economy will start off as a small subset and, ah, we wi, and we're gonna push it and push it and push it, um, until it becomes the engine for transforming the whole society...." By the way, "progressives" is another name for communists and socialists, and this communist--Van Jones--is working to transform the whole society. And, third, to an auditorium audience at the convention for Netroots Nation in August 2009, Valerie Jarrett said: "...Van Jones. We were so delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House. We've been watching him, ah, really, for--he's not that old--for, for as long as he's been active out of Oakland and all of the ways that he has, creative ideas that he has. So now we have captured that, and we have all that energy and enthusiasm in the White House...."
[Note: On Friday, September 2, 2011, I visited the Web site for Uprising Radio, and I found that it has 18 entities offering the radio program to listeners, most of which were radio stations and one of which was "Radio Free Moscow."]
For over two-hundred years, the United States of America has existed, and though laws and rules have been added to the governmental structure of the country since the 1700s, the country has was created years ago and needs not to be created or recreated. On September 21, 2011, Valerie Jarrett made a speech to an Episcopal-type group in Washington, D.C., and she made a number of statements that I have to show off to you here: "...And he [Barack Obama) has vision for our country, and I think his America Jobs Act's a very positive signal about what we could do instantly to create some jobs because we know that's the backbone of our community. We have to give people a livelihood so that they can provide for their families. And it's a vision--I think his is a moral vision--it's a deeply, it's a vision based, based very deeply in values. And taking care of the least of these, and making sure that we are creating a country that is a country for everybody and not just for the very, very wealthy. We're working hard to lift people out of poverty and give them a better life, a footing, and that's what government is supposed to do...." The statement has several defective ideas. For one, it is not the roll of the federal government to "give people a livelihood so that they can provide for their families...." Since the 1700s, a main purpose of the federal government has not been to create jobs for people--and it should not be and should never be--and it has been individuals with strength and fortitude and initiative and such who have started up businesses and done for themselves, and the creation of businesses have lead to jobs being created. Also, the quotation has the very telling--"making sure that we are creating a country that is a country for everybody...." The statement about "creating a country" shows that Valerie Jarrett's thinking is that Barack Obama--with her help, of course-is creating a country or some new entity that can be called the United States of America. The United States of America does not have to be "created," but Valerie Jarrett shows that she is--in her mind--involved in creating a country. Anyway, the United States of America was not founded to be a country only for "...the very, very wealthy..."; The United States Constitution is a document that makes everyone equal under the law, and it has no provisions that give preference to so-called "...the very, very wealthy...." In addition, Valerie Jarrett pushed the idea that government is supposed to "give" people a better life--though government, especially under the ways of a dictator, which she is pushing for by supporting Barack Obama, cannot make lives better by "giving" people things, since in order to give things, it must take things from others and hurt those others by taking things away, and, really, for a person to have a better life, it is mostly the person who must do the work to make the self and the person's life better. Through the speech, Valerie Jarrett taught nonsense and corrupt ideas, and she even lied about the nature of the country. I hope you noticed Valerie Jarrett pushed the idea that Barack Obama has a "moral vision," though Barack Obama has shown his set of "morals" or "moral values" are bad, and one example of that is hiring a tax cheat to be the head of the U.S. Department of the Treasury--Timothy Geithner. Valerie Jarrett is really a bad and evil woman.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 6:
When a good father tells his child to do something, it is usually done for the good of the child or the family, and a good father can even be strict, and I argue, since man is an animal and children are often unruly animals, violence does sometimes need to be used, such as spanking, which goes against the ways of feminism and disfunctional women (many young men, such as in the black communities in inner cities, have become or are unruly since their violent animal natures against others have not been broken down through the use of good fatherly pressure and learning the hurting others is not tolerated, or the young men have not learned in their bodies the feeling of violence and what their violence on others might feel like and gained sympathy for others in pain). "Enslavism" is made up of socialism, communism, Sharia, and other like forms of tyranny, such as the single tribal dictator, and for political policies to be enacted or kept in force in a society based on enslavism, violence must be used, such as the threat of providing no medical care to persons or the threat of pushing prison time on persons (as can be used in relation to speaking out against the political leaders or dictators publicly and even privately), and "enslavism" involves coercion, as happened in the case of the Chrysler Bankruptcy of 2009, in which the Barack Obama administration used coercion to cheat secured bond holders out of money (and information about this exist in my document entitled Frank Beckmann of WJR-AM Interviews Tom Lauria, an Attorney in Chrysler Mess, which can be reached by using this WJR-AM link). By the way, China, Russia, Cuba, and Iran are some of the countries of the world that show coercion and violence by the government on citizens--the way of "enslavism." If "enslavism" were good for people, it would not have to be imposed through violence and coercion, and if "enslavism" were good for people, it would not have be instituted through lies about what is it and deceptive means, which is the way much of the legislation--such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010--pushed along by Barack Obama became law. A fact of life, which cannot be disputed, is socialism and communism are wrong, because they lead to people being hurt purposely by others--politicans--and there are no exceptions to that rule, and the reason that people are hurt is the politicians pushing socialism and communism must use coercion and force and violence to get the people to follow the enslavists' rules and ways, which are anti-individual and are distorted and radical views of nature and the world.
Some women do not like that they are women--as they were born--so it seems to be they disdain women who wish to be real women and would even be willing and eager to harm women who wish to be women--feminine and sexy. Notice this woman who is pictured above this text. Her body is positioned as a feminine woman would pose and should pose, and she shows her like for herself. She shows her comfortability with herself. In fact, she seems to show off that she is proud of herself.
The U.S. Supreme Court has three woman, and all the woman are "liberals," and I say that all are ugly women because of their physical nature and mental nature, and Elena Kagan is one of the three, she is the first of two covered in this document, and this is one woman who attended Harvard Law School (many close of associates of Barack Obama's have ties to Harvard University, which is a school where socialism and communism are, in essence, taught out in the open).
In 2009, this woman was the Solicitor General for the federal government or the Barack Obama administration, and she was arguing the case for the government in the case known as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which would be decided in January 2010. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is falsely promoted by "enslavists" (such as members of the Democratic Party) as a decision that allows corporations to influence elections through money and that makes the individual, in essence, mute. Really, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission struck down the work of the federal government to censor such media items as books and DVDs with political subjects--such as by blocking the publishing of them--around the time of elections. It was while the case was being argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that U.S. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, through a tactical error on her part (since she is a "liberal"), put Elena Kagan into a position to reveal her belief in banning books, by saying: "...Eh, eh, the government's view is that, although 441B does cover full-length books, that there would be a quite good as applied challenge, ah, to any attempt to apply 441B in that context, and I should say that the FEC [Federal Election Commission] has never applied 441B in that context, so, for sixty years, a book has never been at issue...." Here, Elena Kagan was pushing the idea that you should forget she believes the government can censor books, which is against the First Amendment of The United States Constitution, and feel the Federal Election Commission--a federal government entity--would never ban books because it never has in the past, though the entire case had come about because the Federal Election Commission banned the release of a DVD that focused on Hillary Clinton. In June 2011, this woman--Elena Kagan--was taking part in confirmation hearings in the U.S. Senate related to her possibly becoming a member of the U.S. Supreme Court, and on Tuesday, June 29, 2011, U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (a Republican related to Oklahoma) asked Elena Kagan if the government has the power to tell people what they can and cannot eat, and Elena Kagan could give no an answer--the right answer would be "no." Elena Kagan shows she is a woman who believes the federal government can ban books and control what can and cannot be eaten, and that is the sign of an "enslavist," who believes the federal government is all powerful, and that is what you get from an ugly woman.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 7:
So, have you see this woman on American television? You should not have, especially since she is nude. Well, I take that back a bit, since it is possible to see nude woman on television, at least on cable channels.
On television are many "liberals" who can be called women, and since they are "liberals" who have publicly supported Barack Obama and the ways of Barack Obama, and it is commonplace for them to be physically ugly or physically odd or like boys. The women who I like that I present in this document may or may not be a "liberal," but I would rather see her than such known "liberals" as Katie Couric, Ann Curry, Janeane Garofalo, Ellen DeGeneres, Rosie O'Donnell, Rachel Maddox, Diane Sawyer, and Oprah Winfrey, who has supported or promoted Barack Obama and Barack Obama's political ways, at the heart of which is communism ("enslavism"). This woman that I present, who has roundness and softness in the right places, surely does seem happy, and is it not wonderful to see?
To me, it looks as if many women who are regulars on television prime-time television shows have no breasts or no female shape--I have wondered if what is that way because lesbian producers and casting agents are casting women who look like boys, since it is likely it is what they like, or because the casting agents and producers are pushing the idea of having young men dream about being with girls and not women, or because young men are frightened of shapely women like those I present in this document who I like because young men have become feminized and avoid looking at real women. Some of the examples of women on prime-time television series recently who have no shape or almost no breasts are Cat Deely, Calista Flockhart, Kelly Hu, and Maggie Q.
Let me take at look at really, really ugly women of the media by talking about "Occupy Wall Street." On September 17, 2011, people began to hold a protest (of some type) on Wall Street, and over the next few weeks, it was evident to me it was an event being pushed along by communists and anarchists (and information that proved it was to me came from articles, such as material at the Occupy Wall Street Web site, and from radio reports, such as those presented on The Sean Hannity Show and The Mark Levin Show, two nationally syndicated radio shows); by the way, one of the list of demands posted on the Internet were very similar with the planks of the "Communist Manifesto." Over the first few weeks of the event, a number of female celebrities promoted the Occupy Wall Street event as good, such as Roseanne Barr (who made a speech at the event and pushed for "people-ism," a form of socialism), Susan Sarandon, Alyssa Milano, and Yoko Ono (for more information about the event, you should see my document entitled T.H.A.T. #90, which can be reached by using this link: T.H.A.T. #90).
The communist mind--though maybe packaged in a pretty body--is a highly ugly mind nonetheless, and of the women of the media who are listed in this section, one of the ugliest minds is in the head of Janeane Garofalo, who has a number of times shown off her ugly mind on television, one of the most important of which was on August 17, 2011, during a segment of Countdown with Keith Olbermann. Look at a few things that Janeane Garofalo said: "...In this, ah, presidential race, ah, because, ah, he [Herman Cain] deflects the racism of the...that is inherent in the Republican Party, the conservative movement, the Tea Party, certainly. Over the last thirty years, the Republican Party has been moving more and more to the right, but also race baiting more, ah, gag baiting more, religion baiting more. But Herman Cain, I feel like he's being paid by somebody to be involved and to run for president so that, so that...can't be racist, it's a black guy, it's a black guy asking for Obama to be impeached or it's a black guy who's anti-Muslim or it's a black guy who's a Tea Party guy...." and "...Anytime I see a person of color or a female in the Republican Party or the conservative movement--Tea Party--I wonder who they could be trying to curry favor with the oppressors...." and "The Tea Party is so obviously racist, so obviously...." Janeane Garofalo supports Barack Obama--a communist and worse--and communism is "enslavism" and promotes violence against the individual, and the Tea Party movement is anti-communism, and given what Janeane Garofalo said in the interview on this day, it shows how sick her mind is and how dangerous her mind is, using lies and unfounded statements to teach people, especially young people, to follow the ways of a bad and evil man, Barack Obama.
Yes, Janeane Garofalo teaches the principles of the Democratic Party--what is now and forever will be a communist and socialist party--in the United States of America.
Many of the woman tied to Barack Obama who I present in this document act seem to be like men in nature--many are fat and not feminine looking--and, certainly, Janet Napolitano is one of the most obvious cases. I have the belief, gained over many years of living, that the character or persona of a person can, at least over time, show up on the face and can be detected, and part of that thought comes about through the idea that dogs seem to be able to sense the nature of men, and since man is an animal, a man or woman should have the ability to sense the good nature or bad nature men and women. Of course, for a man or a woman to be able to detect the demeanor or nature of other men and women, the man or woman must learn about the nature of the world and how people can be bad
I have heard it reported by "liberals" ("enslavists" or supporters of "enslavists") that Barack Obama has genius quality or is every smart and that, generally speaking, his close associates are, for example, "brilliant," too, but I said that they are not smart in a good sense, though they know facts and things, and that they are smart in things devious, and let me show you how Janet Napolitano does not show true smartness. On June 7, 2011, Janet Napolitano took place in an event related to the law department of New York University, and a man asked her a question about profiling or using profiling related to young men who are "Muslim"-like and security of the country, and Janet Napolitano answered with: "Well, because you'r, you're not using good logic there. Ah, um, you've got to use actual intelligence, ah, that you see, ah, and so, ah, you might, ah, you know, all you've given me is kind of status. You haven't given me a, a technique, a tactic, a behavior, ah, something that would suggest that somebody, ah, is, ah, not, ah, not, ah, ah, Muslim, but is, is Islamist and is actually, as is actually, ah, has moved into, ah, the category of, ah, violent extremist. Ah, now, we have ways to, to, ah, to make, you know, some of those cuts, ah, and they involve, ah, the intell that comes in, the analysis that goes on. Um, for example, ah, we, ah, um, oft, often times for, ah, travelers, ah, entering the United States, ah, we will, ah, do...what's called a secondary inspection just because, ah, they're a thirty-five-year-old male who appears to be Muslim--whatever that means--ah, but we know from intelligence that, if they have a certain travel pattern over a certain period of time, ah, that, dah, dah, that should cause us to ask some more significant, ah, questions, ah, than if they don't...." The answer is defect, but it does not matter, since I want you to focus on the delivery, which is highly defective. Read the statement allowed, and ask yourself--Is this the speech pattern that you should expect from a smart person? To me, it seems, for one, to be the sign of a defective mind grappling with trying to find an answer or trying to make it seem that a useful answer is being presented. [Note: What I was unable to do by presenting Janet Napolitano's words in text form is show how much she talks like a man and has a voice like man's.]
[Note: To learn more about Janet Napolitano, you are urged to see my document entitled Illegal Aliens and Immigration: The Focus is Protecting the Home--The United States of America, which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document.]
Special commentary: I have to define what a good woman is. The women who I like would have to be women who understands the purpose of The United States Constitution. The document was devised as a document that puts limits on men and women who would try to be dictators of the country, and it is a document that "enslavists" in this country have to destroy so that they can be what they wish to be in life--enslavists, who can live the easy life in government jobs in which they could hold for life and never worry about not having a job and money to buy things, knowing they are very unlikely to get fired or lose their job. If the "enslavist" could get rid of much of The United States Constitution--keeping basically only some general rules about how the departments of the country would be set up--what would the enslavist replace it or what really would the "enslavists" want as a defining document for the country? For an enslavist to be "free"--free to do what the enslavist wishes--the enslavist must have the power to dictate to others without restrictions, such as "The Bill of Rights" section of The United States Constitution, which offers, for one, the rule that a person may in public and in private criticize the people in political jobs, which people may not do in communist countries--not really well and fully. Yes, a good woman would understand what the real purpose of The United States Constitution is and would understand the Barack Obama administration has violated The United States Constitution and is aware many people will not fight Barack Obama on the issue and is aware people who try to fight Barack Obama in court on the issue will have to go through years of work to possibly defeat him because of the lag time of pushing cases through the court system, and, yes, a good woman would not be wishy-washy on passing information about those who wish to destroy The United States Constitution, even if it means alienating friends.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 8:
This women makes me take up the point of "feminism" or the "feminist movement" again. When I look around today, I see so many women who seem to be unhappy with what they are. The feminist movement--I think--has led to women being unhappy that they cannot be what they were born to be--women. Today, they have to do work at home and in a job, and by taking up jobs so that they would be seen as "liberated," they added what men had had to deal with for years--the pressures of a job, rest from which they got from coming home to, if they were married, women who were wives. Because so many women ended up having to take on the extra pressures put on them by feminists and the feminist movement, they became disenchanted with their lives and ate more than they should have to soothe away their psychological pain, and they became fat, and the feminist movement led to women dressing regularly like men so that they did not have to work at keep themselves looking like women, which real men would like, and women could hid themselves in their clothes--men-like clothes--and as the days went on and the women got fat, they got even more depressed with or disappointed in themselves. The feminist movement also made men the so-called "enemy," and that put conflicts in women's minds because, generally speaking, men are not "enemies," especially since it is the natural nature of men to care for and protect women, and so the interaction between men and women became more strained--strained beyond the natural nature of stain that may exist between two individuals (for being two different individuals or beings). Also the feminist movement led to the idea that women are second-class people if they wish to stay home to give birth to children and take care of children--and not let government take care of their children--and care for their spouse, and the feminist movement has helped increase divorces, since women now have unrealistic views of what they can do and should like to be, and it has led no more boys not growing up in a home with a strong man (a father) around and not seeing the interaction between a man and a woman (as a husband-and-wife team), and the feminist movement has led to too many boys being raised only indirectly by men and becoming feminized--and not full men--or not learning to control their animalistic violent nature. By the way, I wonder how many feminists are irritated who I like women presented in this document who do not come off as "feminists" or like a pseudo men. To get back to the point, I wonder how many so-called men are not men and have not the nerve to take on the ugly women that I present in this document.
I am a man who wishes to protect good women, and through this document, I am, in essence, working to protect the gorgeous women who I like that are presented in this document. Each woman that I present in this document who I like is headed for hard times with her health if she is living in the United States of America and if the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is not killed. I am not stupid about how bad the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is, as are a bunch of other men in the country, who can be called sissies or wimps. I know the act will increase the cost of health care in the country, will lead to the killing of the private health-care system in the country, and will lead to the enslavement of doctors and other health care workers to federal-government bureaucrats, and there are many other bad features, such as the ability of the federal government to access your accounts at any time and remove money from the accounts. I get pissed off when the women who I like--good women--are hurt or are going to be hurt, and I am aware Barack Obama is purposely working to hurt them through the institutionalizing of the Patent Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and other bad laws
Announcement: A man who would not want to protect this cutie that I show in this section by working to show up the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 as crap is not much good as a man, no matter how physically big the man is or how physically strong the man is or how physically tough-looking the man is.
Nancy Pelosi was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives on August 21, 2011 (she is a Democrat related to California and had not not been put in her job by Barack Obama, which is why I present no photograph of her in this document to show you how ugly she is), and on August 21, 2011, Nancy Pelosi spoke to some people and said these words: "...Imagine, imagine that they [Republicans] are protecting tax cuts for top two percent--but it's really more, higher than that, lower than that, I mean a higher, ah, percentage of people excluded from who they're looking out for--and it's, it's a, it's an, a stunning thing, because it's a few people amassing money that doesn't really make a difference in their quality of life. I'd decided what it was about them is that--this is my theory--what more do they want? They have...homes, the bigger the yacht, dah dah dah dah, the taller the mast, the whole thing. They have museum quality art. And I've decided, if, in fact, they are advocating for this--which I'm not sure they are, I think the Republicans just like to have that position--they want immortality, they want so much money that they are names are...for prestige they could never get any other way, they could buy with endless money, because what else could you possible want that you would say I want this at the expense of the middle class of our democracy, of fairness, of clean air, clean water, food safety, public education, and the rest of it?...." and "...When we won the election, ah, in oh six, and we came in, the first day, in the first one-hundred hours, we raised the minimum wage. It was the first time the minimum wage was raised in eleven years. I bring that up for this reason--it wasn't kept down because people just, you know, small businesses said I just can't afford. It was kept down for a purpose! It was kept down for the purpose that people would not be able to live on that. They'd have to borrow, get home equity loans or get their, get their mortgage.... They'd have to live on credit card. And what are they doing when they do that? They're paying fees to the banks! They're paying fees.... It was a contrived dependence on private credit for millions, ten of millions of working people in our country...." Here, Nancy Pelosi was teaching crap through her collection of nonsense ideas, and, by the way, she could not even get her statements out without goofing up, and of the many nonsense ideas, the worst is the idea that the minimum wage was not raised so that people would be forced to use credit cards and pay fees to the banks, which is nothing more than a way for Nancy Pelosi to make ignorant people hate banks by using a lie. Yes, "liberal women" or really women who support enslavism (such as communism and socialism) are ugly women, and this ugly woman--Nancy Pelosi--is an "enslavist" of the highest nature.
This woman, who was born in Dublin, Ireland, became the Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs for Barack Obama in 2009, and she is also is a Special Assistant to Barack Obama. The woman is married to Cass Sustein, who was for a while the "Regulatory Czar" for Barack Obama. Cass Sustein and this woman are anti-United States of America; for example, Cass Sustein has pushed that the wealth of the United States of America should be redistributed to poorer nations, saying that, for example, in a paper that he wrote entitled "Climate Change Justice." Oh, both Cass Sustein and Samantha Power have ties to Harvard University, one of the breeding grounds for defective people--communists and socialists--in the country, and, by the way, these communists or socialists were married on July 4, 2008. Although this woman is the Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs, she has publicly shown support for the Palestinians in the Middle East and not for the Israelis.
I say that the face of a person can show off what the person is, especially over time, because the brain guides that person's persona and facial expressions. Of course, a person doing the looking at a face has to have some skill at recognizing signs of problems in a mind that show up on a face. The face of this woman shows off--to me--a disturbed woman, and, yet, Barack Obama has her as an associate.
On Monday, September 5, 2011, I used the Internet to see videos with Samantha Power, looking specifically for what she has said publicly, such as on radio shows, and here are three paragraph that show some what Samantha Power is.
The first video was entitled "Samantha Power on Barack Obama," and it provided material from an interview she was involved with on New York Public Radio in 2007. Here is one portion: "....I left Harvard in, ahum, 2005 and, and 2006 and worked, um, I like to say, as an intern in Obama's office, since that what it felt like sometimes...." Here is another portion: "...He was very determined even from a early stage to try ta figure out how to move beyond just whacking George Bush and criticizing him, which seemed to very easy to, ah, formulating a constructive alternative foreign policy agenda...."
Another video was "Samantha Power on Obama and the Armenian American Issues," and it was a public relations and promotion video from early 2008 that she was involved with. Here is one portion: "...I am Samantha Power, ah, professor at the Kennedy School of Government and one of Barack Obama's senior foreign policy advisors...." Here is another portion: "...Um, I know him [Barack Obama] very well, and, ah, he is a person of incredible integrity and his, his, he's not going to focus group his way to making very important policy decisions...." Here is yet another portion: "...And we need somebody who takes over in 2009 and can actually build a working majority to deal with getting out of Iraq, to deal with health care, ah, to not let anybody...talk about a plan for health care reform, but who's gonna build a working majority and overcome the polarization that has so crippled us. So, I hope you in the Armenian community, um, ah, will take my word for it, and if not I hope you'll just pay attention in these coming days, ah, to everything that comes out of that person's mouth--Barack Obama's mouth--because he's a person who can actually be trusted...."
And yet another video was entitled "Conversations with History," which was a interview done at the University of California--Berkeley--for a television show in 2008. Here is one portion: "...And I actually think in, in the Palestine-Israeli situation, there's an abundance of information, and what, what we don't need is some kind of early warning, um, mechanism. You know, what we need is a willingness to actually put something on the line in sort of helping the situation, and putting something on the line might mean alienating, ah, domestic constituency of tremendous, ah, ah, political and financial import. Um, it may more crucially mean sacrificing or, or, ah, investing--I think the word sacrificing--um, you know, billions of dollars in not in servicing Israelis', you know, military but actually investing in the new state of Palestine...." Another statement is: "...But sadly, you know, we don't just have a democracy here either [the United States of America], we have a liberal democracy...."
In all the videos, I found that Samantha Power had a phoniness to her or a phony or fake persona, which seemed to come out of her attempt to express intelligence to onlookers, and that phoniness was very evident in her speech pattern, which was unnatural, having a cold voice tone and lifeless delivery, lacking happiness.
By the way, it was around April 24, 2012, Americans were beginning to learn, at least from a few sources, that Barack Obama made Samantha Power the chairman of a new government-based board--the Atrocities Prevention Board--the power of which has yet to be clearly known.
Special commentary for women:
This section men may read, but it is designed for woman specifically, and it presented information that can help a woman identify whether or not she is an ugly woman--because of her mind. Some women have the mistaken belief that corporations and so-called "rich" people do not pay income taxes or get out of paying income taxes, maybe by cheating on their taxes, but that is a lie, and if you believe so-called "rich" people and corporations do not pay taxes, you are an ugly woman--because, for one, you are stupid and dangerously stupid. Some women are unaware that, when the federal government raises taxes on companies and corporations, which do pay taxes and have to pay more taxes when the federal government raises taxes on them, it is really the women who end up having to spend more money, because companies and corporations often have to raise prices on goods and services to stay in business, because they have bills to pay and employees to pay, so if you are a woman who believes you do not have to spend more money for things when the federal government increases taxes on companies and businesses, you are an ugly woman, since ignorance is an ugly feature of a woman, no matter how well shape she is. Some women believe they deserve something from the government for simply being alive, and it is is a part of "economic justice" in which the government takes from some to give to others to make people equal or more equal, and they truly believe in "economic justice," and if you believe that idea you are an ugly woman. Some women believe the federal government can create jobs, but that is nonsense, since, for example, to have money to give to some entity to make a road and give someone a job, the federal government has to take the money from corporations and individuals, and anyway, when the federal government takes money from corporations and individuals, such as through taxes, the corporations and individuals have less money to spend that can result in the creation of jobs and the creation of assets that add to the wealth of the country, such as necklaces, bracelets, cars, houses, combs, et cetera, and if you believe the federal government can create jobs, you are an ugly woman. By the way, the ugly woman will say that the government is creating jobs by making roads--you can only have so many roads and not everyone can be involved in making roads. Some women believe a savior is going to come a save them and make the world better and take way their pain, and they most often think that the savior will come in the form of a politician, and that is high nonsense, and if you believe a savior in the form of a politician is going to come a save you, you are an idiot and an ugly woman, since, for one, no man or woman is coming as "savior," because those who promote themselves a "saviors" are quite nuts to think their are really "saviors" or are big liars, and if you will fight for someone who is a savior--or "messiah"--in political form, your work ends up hurting good people. Since the Democratic Party in the United States of American is now and will always be a communist party and socialist party, any woman who identifies herself as a "democrat" is ugly, since the ideology of the communist and the socialist is ugly--it is centered around oppression and gang behavior or mob behavior, such as like the gang behavior of drug thugs in urban big cities like Detroit. In the end, I note that good men abhor ugly women and avoid them like plagues, and if you are having a hard time finding a good man, it is probably because you are ugly--you have an ugly mind, filled with crappy thoughts.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 9:
Okay, women do take part in beauty pageants--dressed or undressed--and I have yet to be a judge at for a beauty pageant with a flock of wonderfully shaped women who are not dressed, like the woman that is shown in this section of the document, but so goes life.
Yes, I think women should be sex objects, as men can be for women. I wonder if Barack Obama's women like "straw men," which is what Barack Obama likes. "Straw men" are false choices, and Barack Obama uses them regularly. In the past, for example, Barack Obama might say something like, if we don't raises taxes, we'll have to cut back on teachers or, as was done on January 25, 2011 for a "State of the Union" speech, Barack Obama passed along the idea that, before we take money from our schools, we should tax the wealthy more, but the problem, here, is the government is already taking in a given amount of money from people, and by not taking more money from the wealthy, the amount of money that the government has remains the same or there is no change, so you can see Barack Obama brought out a false situation--by not taxing the wealthy more does not reduce the money that the schools get. Incidentally, generally speaking, money for schools comes from property taxes that people and businesses pay to the towns or cities or counties in which they are based, and it is not the purpose of the federal government to use money that it takes in through taxes to pay teachers and build schools, so Barack Obama passed along a lie about how schools are funded when he used a "straw-man" argument that involves teachers not being paid if the so-called rich are not taxed more. On Thursday, October 6, 2011, Barack Obama held another press conference--which I say was a boring and lackluster affair, since he put out the same old topics and his speech pattern was labored and choppy--and early in the press conference, Barack Obama said: "...And some see this class warfare. I see it as a simple choice--We can either keep taxes as, exactly as they are for millionaires and billionaires with loopholes that lead them to have lower tax rates in some cases than plumbers and teachers or we can put teachers and construction workers and veterans back on the job...." See it is a false choice that is given related to paying teachers. A little later in the speech, Barack Obama, while talking about his American Jobs Act, which he said would lower taxes, said: "...It is now up to all the Senators and hopefully all the members of the House to explain to their constituencies why they would be opposed to commonsense ideas that historically have been supported by Democrat and Republicans in the past. Sa, why would you be opposed to tax cuts for small businesses and tax cuts for American workers?...." In essence, around this time, the "American Jobs Act" was stalled in the U.S. Senate, because the head of the U.S. Senate--Harry Reid (a Democrat related to Nevada)--was aware the proposed bill is a tax bill, and, for example, on page 135 of the proposed bill, it shows how couples will be getting a cut back in deductions that they can make--and that is a tax increase--so Barack Obama lied and put up a false idea and a false relationship. Yes, Barack Obama likes "straw men," and it seems possible Barack Obama's women--since they support him--like "straw men" (and not real good men). [Note: On Tuesday, October 11, 2011, the Republicans and three Democrats in the U.S. Senate voted "no" on the proposed "American Jobs Act" in the U.S. Senate, and the proposed act died.]
A person can have a defective view in mind of what life is, and if the person works to teach that defective view of life to others, the others can become defective in their thinking about what life is, such as what the world is or what nature is and what a person is in relation to the world of nature. Some people think that there is some "social contract" that a person is tied to when born with respect to the world or, more specifically, to a society, but that is nonsense thought. Before I present words spoke by a evil woman named Elizabeth Warren in September 2011, I have to talk a bit about "social contract," which seems to mean that a person has an obligation spelled out in a contract by being born to help others or the society in ways determined by so-called elites.
"Social contract"--this set of words with a vague meaning is something that a person can expect an "enslavist," such as a Marxist, to push as something real to the individual, but "social contract" does not exist, except in the minds of those who wish to push the idea--the idea is illusion or mythical or make-believe--and I can point that out through several examples. Pretend it is 1883, and we are looking in on a Eskimo family (a man, the man's wife, and a child) in what would become known as Alaska (a state of the United States of America). They travel around in a canoe-like boat and search for seal and other food on, in essence, a daily basis. The man is, in essence, obligated by taking on the woman as a wife and by being involved in producing a child to care for them--as a provider--and, of course, the woman has duties, which at least for a while would mean breast feeding the child to keep it alive. Actually, there is no written out contract that makes the man obligated to care for the woman and the child, but, as the ways of nature, the man does and will, unless the man is a defective being, which can happen, such as through disease of the mind, and, of course, if the man dies, he becomes unable to care for the woman and the child. Is not the man like a lion who protects his females or like the male walrus. In addition, the man, the woman, and the child are not obligated to care for other families through some type "social contract" that they have signed up for upon being born. Also pretend it is 1883, and we are looking in on a family farm on the plains of the North American continent. The father--the man--does such jobs as pulling up rocks from the planting area and plowing and does other duties to provide food, and the mother--the woman--cares for a baby and does other duties, and both do what is necessary for them to survive, and, in addition, they care the woman's mother, whose husband died after a tooth abscess spread. The farm family and the Eskimo father own nothing to the other, and each can be wiped off the face of the Earth or killed any moment. If we travel through time, we can add more people or families to the world, and the world becomes more complex, but the basics of life continue on, in which a person is obligated to care for the self and usually family members--at least, any offspring--and not all others who exist in the world.
The fact is anyone who is born in the United States of America and is a citizen of the United States of America is not tied to any so-called "social contract."
Elizabeth Warren is another person with a close association with Barack Obama who has ties to Harvard University, an educational place that is a hotbed for socialism and communism and teaching nonsense ideas (for example, she teaches at the Harvard University Law School and is married to a man who is a professor in the law department at Harvard University), and in September 2011, during a "talking tour," Elizabeth Warren, said: "...There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own! Nobody! You built your factory out there, good for you. But I wanna be clear--you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for! You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate! You, ah, were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for! You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory and hire someone to protect against this because of the work that the rest of us did!...."
So, I must analyze for you, though you can do analyzing while I do, the paragraph that is presented right before this paragraph, because it is filled with nonsense, fantasy, ignorance, et cetera. Elizabeth Warren pushes the defective argument that a business owner who does well owes others since that business owner used the public roads. Well, everybody uses the public roads, and the public roads have come about through taxes, such as property taxes, that people and businesses pay. If Elizabeth Warren's argument had merit, it could be argued well that a business owner who does not do well should get a rebate from the government. Again, businesses pay property taxes and other taxes that can go to funding schools, as individuals do. Businesses pay property taxes and other taxes that can go to funding police departments and fire departments. Elizabeth Warren pushed the argument that the successful business owner owes others for having done well or for doing well, and that is nonsense and a sick thought. In addition, Elizabeth Warren is out teaching that nonsense to others, and that is evil. But let me continue with more analysis. When a business owner has a business, the business owner hires people to do jobs that help make the business run, and those people receive money by working for the business, and within a business, there are different levels of skill or knowledge required, and pay varies in relation to the skill and knowledge needed, and, in essence, the best pay can go to the owner who took risks to create the business, such as by using saved-up money or by taking out a loan that is tied to collateral (a thing, such as a house) that could be taken away from the business owner if the business fails, which is one reason a business owner hires people who do things and do not slack off at work. All the while, a business owner has to deal with marketplace forces, in which other businesses can lure good employees away if the business owner does not pay employees what can be called the prevailing wage of the area for a given type of job or, maybe, a little better--if a business owner were to pay truly bad wage, employees would leave for other places and the business would probably fail. Really, it is the growth of businesses and the number of businesses created over the years and decades that have allowed communities and governments to grow--over time, more and more assets that can make up a community are created and raise the overall wealth of the community. A community in the United States of America is created by the people who are there, and people have different skills and abilities--and some people purposely do nothing with what they have in life--and some people have the ability and skill and determination to fight through adversity and create a business, which could become very successful, and that person's rewards in life come from achieving goals, and if those goals were not to exist, taken away by, for instance, communists, then who would take chances in life and create things, which would lead to others having better lives. Elizabeth Warren uses the roads, and she has done well it seems--being able to teach defective thoughts for money--and she has been able to use good roads and do well because over the last two-hundred-plus years, businesses have been created and have led to creating jobs and the growth of communities, such as universities--even communistic-based universities like Harvard University--and the quoted material shows the selfishness that Elizabeth Warren, since it shows she believes all successful business owners are defective, and that is sickness in the mind. It is impossible for all successful business owners to be selfish to such a degree that she implied--it would go against life and nature to have it that only bad people are successful business people. Elizabeth Warren pushed the idea that successful business people are obligated to help others and make the others equal with them, and that is nonsense, since
Keep in mind: Some people might say that the United States of America has exploited other countries by using the resources of the world, but when they say that it is only said to advance themselves and make the United States of America appear to be the big bad country in the world, despite the fact that so many other countries are where they are--not because of the people of the United States of America doing things and working to make their lives and the lives of their children better--but because those other countries have been using socialistic and communistic and tribal-type governments for decades and decades and have done nothing, and, in fact, it has been the United States of America that has, for one, had to teach people in countries in Africa how to get water, though those entities as civilizations have existed for centuries, and, in the end, that has been results of the ways of kings and queens and chiefs and dictators over the centuries--all fighting to be on top of the world, no matter what happens to others.
Also Elizabeth Warren made this comment on the same day as the comment that I have already shown you: "...Now look! You built a factory, and it turned into something terrific or a great idea, god bless! Keep a big hunk of it! But part of the underlying social contract is you take a hunk of that and pay forward to the next kid who comes along!...."
Notice the idea of "social contract" within her statement and the tie in with "pay forward." When a business operator is running a business, the business operator pays wages that help people live, and those people can have families, and because those people are able to live and create families, the business owner is, in essence, helping to make the next generation. The business owner is not obligated to directly take care of other people's children--the business owner is doing for the moment. By the way, Barack Obama is breaking the "social contract" idea that Elizabeth Warren has put forth, since he has put a heavy debt burden on the next several generations by being the biggest spender in international history--if Elizabeth Warren's "social contract" is a truth, Barack Obama has criminally violated it and should be jailed.
Note: A reward in life for an individual--by doing something--can be to live, and by succeeding beyond simple basics, the individual can receive other rewards, such as so-called riches, but when an individual is blocked from doing things by the rules of the society, trying to give everyone equal rewards for varied efforts, the society degenerates into, in essence, the lowest common denominator.
On January 22, 2009, Susan Rice became the Ambassador to the United Nations (the UN) for the United States of America and Barack Obama, and Susan Rice has a business degree (an MBA) from Harvard University Business School, and Susan Rice is marriage to a producer (Ian Cameron, who was born in Canada) who works at ABC News, and you should see there is problem--Susan Rice works for Barack Obama and is married to a producer at ABC News, which is supposed to report on Barack Obama without bias.
The United Nations, which was created after the end of World War II, came into existence in 1945, and since that day, the United Nations has turned into a defective organization, which has been involved in corrupt events and frauds. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the United Nations has been involved directly in the fraud known as manmade climate change or manmade global warming, pushing fake data about climate change on the world (more information on the subject can be found by seeing my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this link: Carbon. It was in December 2010 that a number of member nations of the United Nations were pushing for a climate-related treaty that would have called for Western-developed nations, such as the United States of America, to give up money that could be given to, for one, Third World-type nations because the Western-developed nations had been and were--supposedly--hurting the planet by using carbon-based fuels, and the premise was all based on the defective people and entities and data related to manmade climate change or manmade global warming (and, incidentally, Barack Obama was pushing to have the treaty created and undercutting the government of the United States of America, such as The United States Constitution, which would have been made subordinate to the treaty). I say that the involvement of United Nations in the manmade-climate-change scheme or manmade-global-warming scheme to extort money out of Western nations is enough to show the defectiveness of the United Nations, but there are other scandals or corruption incidents that show that the United Nations is a defective organization, such as the Oil-for-Food scandal, which was a big news story in 2004, and what might be called the Sex-for-Food scandal, which was a big news story in 2006.
I have some examples of what Susan Rice has said as the United States of American ambassador to the United Nations. Susan Rice said: "...When we meet our financial obligations to the UN, we make Americans safer...." and "...The UN promoted universal values Americans hold dear...." And in an interview with Al Jazeera English on February 18, 2011, Susan Rich said: " "...As I said today in the Security Council and as President Obama has said on many occasions, the United States strongly opposes, ah, continued Israeli settlement activity...."
[Note: You are most urged to se my document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal: A Short Information-and-Status Report, which provides information about what was and what was not done by Barack Obama and his associates at the time of the Benghazi (Libya) attack of September 11, 2012, and which can be reached by using this Benghazi link.]
"Spreading the wealth around" in the United States of America has hurt the black community of the country, such as by making welfare payments easy to get, and has helped lead to black men abandoning women and the home, especially in areas where blacks are concentrated--the inner cities--and now Barack Obama wishes to expand the policy of spreading the wealth around to other countries, which will in the long run hurt those countries, as the policy of spreading the wealth around has hurt the black community in the country, or what can be said is Barack Obama's work will put more blacks in poverty around the world. It has been said by "liberals" that what the United States of America is and what is has done over the last two-hundred years or so has been the reason so many countries around the world are poor--the United States of America has exploited other countries and the resources of the world. That is a nonsense idea. Really, the United States of America started to develop in the 1500s and especially in the 1660s, and it was in 1776, when the country was founded. Before 1776, people had civilizations and countries on almost all the continents of the world, especially Africa, so many peoples around the world have had many decades and centuries to create societies that are worthwhile, but they have not. Really, the United States of America has put no political or religious restrictions on other countries that can be blamed on keeping many peoples of the world poor.
By the way, blacks run businesses, and if they make a profit, Barack Obama is also after their money--"enslavism" has no race boundary, and an "enslavist" sticks it to everybody, no matter the race (as history shows).
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 10:
Before I show off another cutie, I have to present a fact of life related to the United States of America, which I hope the cutie who is about to be presented would be smart enough to understand. In life, there is good and bad, or there are bad people and good people, or there are bad political systems and good political systems. I can argue well the general structure of the political system in the United States of America is a good political system, which is based on a document called The United States Constitution, which is, for one, designed to block a person or a few persons from coming dictators over most of the citizenry of the country, and I can argue well that socialism and communism (which is hard-line socialism)--or, really, "enslavism"--are bad political systems, and, for example, I can show examples that communism leads to a few people having the power to kill people who do not uphold the enslavist values of communism at will, and that has happened in the Soviet Union and Cuba and China. Communism and socialism involve violence and coercion and oppression, and people who take up the causes of socialism and communism are bad people, and there is no qualifications to that. In the United States of America today, there are two main political parties--the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party of the United States of America is and will always be a party that upholds the values of communism and socialism or what some people called "statism," which is tied to the idea of an "ant society" in which a few people are, in essence, all powerful or in which the government is all powerful, and I say that, today, the Democratic Party is the party of enemies to the United States of America as it was founded , and the members of that party are working to make The United States Constitution passé or defunct or nonexistent, and proof of that can be shown in how Barack Obama and the Democrats in the U.S. Congress have worked and what they have agreed to through votes on federal bills since at least January 20, 2011, and, for example, the Democrats pushed for and passed the constitutionally invalid Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and Barack Obama signed that bill into law, and to pass that bill, the Democrats had had to used underhanded and even illegal means. The Republican Party as a rule is a party that upholds the values of The United States Constitution, and, for the most part, the party is made up of good people, who can be called "conservatives"; however, some people in the Republican Party are not "conservatives" in truth and are only "conservatives" in name, since they are fakes or "moderates" or wishy-washy people who do not truly see the dangers of the Democrats of today and are willing to compromise with the Democrats as much as possible or do not what to see the dangers of the Democrats. I say that, forever, the Democratic Party is an anti-American political party and always will be, and all persons who take up with the Democratic Party are the enemies of the United States of America as it was founded, since they uphold the ideas of the Democratic Party, which, I say, is working to change the United States of America in to the "Enslavist States of America." The women who I would like would have to understand the idea that I present in this paragraph.
What the Democratic Party will attract are deviants, malcontents, and morally corrupt persons, such as tax cheats, especially we talk about leaders and politicians, who truly understand the underlying beliefs of the Democrat Party, but when the issue is supporters, the Democratic Party will attract deviants and morally corrupt persons and also will attract the ignorant, such as young persons who are stupid about what the true underlying beliefs of the Democratic Party are, and the deviants, malcontents, and morally corrupt persons go to the Democrat Party because the Republican Party cannot stand to have them around or cannot put up with them, since deviants, malcontents, morally corrupt persons have to go somewhere, because, like good people, they have lives to live and something has to be done with their lifetimes and time.
It is fact that more and more socialists and communists--evil people--have entered the political scene of the United States of America since the early 1900s and especially since the 1960s, and the political system of the country has evolved to the point where the Democratic Party will always be on the bad side of the political spectrum and the Republican Party will be, generally speaking, on the good side of the political spectrum, and it has all happened while more and more countries in the world have become crippled by socialists and communists, meaning the United States of America is getting more out numbered politically in the world every day.
Anytime a good man meets a "Democrat," the man's defenses should immediately go up, since the "Democrat" is the enemy of the man, since the "Democrat" promotes enslavement of the man, such as through lies and deception.
Okay, let me have some fun (and I do not mean have sexual intercourse with this woman, which I would not be adverse to having), and this paragraph of fun will throw outs ideas that might be considered off the deep end, but I need a break from the evilness and ugliness of Obama's women. This woman is showing herself off, surely working to entice men and make them think about having an ejaculation session within her. The picture must irritate and angry the women who dislike the idea of a woman working to entice men to thoughts of sexual intercourse, since if a man were to have sexual intercourse with this woman and lead to her becoming pregnant, then she might give birth, and if she gives birth, then the population of the world will increase, and if the population of the world increases that could be detrimental to the women who think the more women that give birth the more that the planet is threatened and the more their lives and well being will be threatened. Yes, to those women who are against women who wish to be women, it is probably wonderful to them that more young woman act like guys so that they will not entice men into providing women with sperm through sexual intercourse and kill the planet. In addition, some women must dislike this woman because the woman is giving herself up to a man or is willing to be submissive to a man, which, I say, is nonsense, since women do have the urge to take part in sexual intercourse and get a man to submit to her and make his penis available to her. Also, some women must hate this woman because of jealousy, having not be born with such physical shape that is highly attractive to males. To me, I see three reasons why Obama's women would be willing to do harm to this woman that I show to get even with nature and the woman, and they would wish to hurt her through legislation about population growth, food that may be used and eaten, where she may go, what fuel may be used, et cetera.
On WLS-AM radio one day, a host of the Don Wade and Roma radio show--Don Wade--asked U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (a Democrat related to Illinois) a question about what percentage of the money that the host makes should not be taken away in taxes or of every dollar that the host earns how much of it should the host be able to keep or how much does he deserves to keep, and the question actually led to Don Wade and Roma questioning Jan Schakowsky. The day was September 14, 2011. Here is a portion of the interview:
Don Wade: "...So, Jan Schakowsky, out of every dollar that I earn, how much do you think that I deserve to keep?"
Jan Schakowsky: "Well, I, what is, what is really, ah, your, your, your question here? Do you think you should not contribute to...."
Don Wade: "No, no...."
Jan Schakowsky: "...to firefighter...."
Don Wade: "...It's a very simple question."
Jan Schakowsky: "...no...."
Don Wade: "Out of every dollar I earn, how much do you, Jan Schakowsky, think I deserve to keep?"
Jan Schakowsky: "...No, it's not a simple question. I think...."
Don Wade: "Very simple."
Jan Schakowsky: "you don't deserve. I'll put it this way.
Don Wade: "...."
Jan Schakowsky: "You don't deserve to keep all of it."
Don Wade: "Why?"
Jan Schakowsky: "...And it's not a question of deserving, because what government is is those things that we decide to do together, and there are many things that we decide to do together, like have our national security, ah, like have, you know, police and fire...."
Don Wade: "Okay, national security...."
Jan Schakowsky: "What about...."
Don Wade: "...police, fire...."
Jan Schakowsky: "...what about those people that work at the, um, the National Institutes of Health looking for a cure for cancer? Do you think we ought to do that together? Those are real jobs. And those are things that you help pay for. And I think that is a good thing."
Don Wade: "Okay. So, let me ask again. Out of every dollar I earn, how much do you think I deserve to keep?"
Jan Schakowsky: "I'm not going to give you a percentage...."
Don Wade: "Why?"
Jan Schakowsky: "I don't know what, what your income is. But I...."
Don Wade: "But what does my income got to do? I'm just asking you how much...."
Jan Schakowsky: "I think you need to pay your fair share in order to do the things that we've decided are national priorities!"
Don Wade: "So, wait a minute! Hold on! Who's deciding what my fair share is?"
That ends the material that you need to see, and now I ask you--What is "fair share" and who should determine what "fair share" is?
Jan Schakowsky's bringing up the idea of "fair share" shows that she works to make people think man can make everybody's life fair, and that is nonsense.
Kathleen Sebelius is the woman on the right in the photograph shown below, and this woman is the head of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and, in essence, because of the creation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, she has the power to determine whether or not you get health care.
On January 29, 2008, Kathleen Sebelius gave her endorsement to Barack Obama for the U.S. Presidency, and the event took place is El Doralo, Kansas. At one point while making the endorsement to the crowd, Kathleen Sebelius said: "...Barack Obama has midwestern values, values that we know about, and he got them from his grandparents and from his mom...." On this date in 2008, it was clear to smart persons that Barack Obama was a socialist and communist, and it was clear the Democrat Party was a communistic and socialistic and no longer the party of John Kennedy's day, when it was not a hard-line leftist party, and on this date, it was clear communism and socialism has no ties to "midwestern values," but Kathleen Sebelius passed along the big lie about Barack Obama on this day.
On January 14, 2010, Kathleen Sebelius was a guest on The Colbert Report, a television show featuring Stephen Colbert. One thing that Katheen Sebelius was able to say, when given a chance, which was hard, since Stephen Colbert rambled on or hogged much of the time for the interview, is: "An insurance company can decide to boot you out of your plan, can decide to, ah, not cover you anymore, can decide to limit your benefits if you or our family gets sick, so people with insurance are at the mercy of insurance companies picking and choosing. And folks without insurance who are working men and women, ah, who want affordable coverage, want to protect their families can't, and you're helping to pay the cost that they have for health care when they come through an emergency-room door as the only way to access a doctor that gets added about a thousand dollar on to your family policy. So there's a lot in there for you...." History has already begun to show her statement is nonsense, and in the future, history should show that the statement is nonsense. If the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which was made law in March 2010, should not be repealed soon, everyone will be beholden on the government for health care, and what she did with the statement is attack the entire health-care-insurance industry based on a few cases, and that is truth since it is easy to see how many people are not dropped and get incredible amount of care through health-care insurance, from knee operations when they are in their eighties to cancer treatment to heart operations when they are in their eighties.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was sold through lies to the American public by Democrats and many persons in the media. On March 3, 2011, which was about one year after the act had been made law, there was a hearing by the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee. At one point, there was a back-and-forth question-and-answer session between U.S. Representative John Shimkus (a Republican related to Pennsylvania) and Kathleen Sebelius, who was then the head of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and here is a portion of the back-and-forth session:
John Shimkus: "There is an issue here on the budget because your own actuary has said--You can't double count. You can't count five-hundred. They're, they're attacking Medicare on the CR when their bill--your law--cuts five-hundred-billion dollars in Medicare. Then, you're also using the same five-hundred-billion dollars--to what?--say you're funding health care. Your own actuary says--You can't do both. So my simple question--I have twenty-sev, twenty-six seconds left--What's the five-hundred-billion dollar cuts for, preserving Medicare or funding health-care law? Which is it?"
Kathleen Sebelius: "Sir, the Affordable Care Act adds twelve years to the Medicare Trust Fund, according to every actuary, and the five-hundred-billion dollars represents a slowdown in the growth rate of Medicare over ten years from what was projected at eight percent...."
[They talked over each other.]
John Shimkus: "...So is it Medicare? Is it using it to save Medicare? Or are you usin' it to fund health-care reform? Which one?"
Kathleen Sebelius: "Both."
John Shimkus: "...Double counting."
For me, it is easy to find and recognize ugly women--women with ugly minds--and they are most often Democrats, and they can even be governors of a state, as was Jennifer Granholm, who was the governor of Michigan from 2001 to 2009, and one such ugly woman who has been a governor is Beverly Perdue. On September 27, 2011, Beverly Perdue, who was then the governor of North Carolina, appeared at a Cary Rotary Club meeting in Cary, North Carolina, and she said: "...You have to have more ability from Congress, I think, to work together and to get over the partisan bickering and focus on fixing things. I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won't it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this country recover. I, I really hope that someone can agree with me on that...." It is pointed out that Beverly Perdue is tied to the Democratic Party, and Beverly Perdue was pushing the idea of the Democratic Party that was designed to get people--citizens--to push Republicans in the U.S. Congress to work with and compromise with the Democrats in the U.S. Congress, the latter of whom are pushing and have been pushing socialistic and communistic ways--"enslavism"--on the country, one of which includes forgetting about the values and rules contained within The United States Constitution. When I heard the recording of Beverly Perdue's statement, I could tell Beverly Perdue was talking in a serious tone and was not using a jocular tone, the latter of which would show she was working to get her audience to laugh. I say that--while Barack Obama is the U.S. President--it is the time for gridlock in the U.S. Congress and for Republicans to give in no inch to the Democrats! Yes, Beverly Perdue would most assuredly like to have no elections, because then the U.S. Congress would not--for sure--have enough people who would work to repeal completely, for one, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (if the U.S. Congress were not changed within the next two years, Democrats in the U.S. Congress could block any attempt to kill the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, since they control the U.S. Senate). Notice that Beverly Perdue's statement that she hopes "someone can agree with me on that" was and is pushing people to put that idea in mind and think about it and work for it in a serious way--it was a tactical move to get the idea in the minds of people.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 11:
Now, here is a woman--showing herself as a feminine-type woman--and she is very attractive to me. When I look at her, I can only assume she is well and not in pain, like a person who, for example, regularly has migraine headaches. I would be sad to hear this woman is not well. Of course, if she were ill she might be able to get medical treatment.
In March 2011, Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, one main purpose of which is to lead the country into a health-care system controlled fully by the federal government or bureaucrats. When a country has a government that is complete control of the health-care system--giving citizens only the option of getting health care from the government--if the government should refuse a citizen health care, the person has no other option for health care. When a country has a health-care system in which there is competition between doctors and between hospitals, if a person cannot get treatment from one hospital team or doctor, since, maybe, the hospital team or doctor might think the medical treatment may fail or not be worthwhile, the person could find another hospital team or doctor who will take up the medical treatment because they are trying something new as a treatment. In addition, what gets to be a problem with a government-run medical system is money-the availability of money. Some people do not work to take care of themselves either by doing personal care, such as brushing teeth, or by spending money on themselves for health care from someone else, and what happens with a government-run medical system is people who do take care of themselves as is the way of nature have to use their lives to take care of those who will not care for themselves by giving up tax money or more and more tax money, and also people who do take care of themselves as is the way of nature end up having to pay out for the care of those who take advantage of the medical system by going for unnecessary medical care.
Barack Obama and Kathleen Sebelius did not create this woman, and they have no claim to whether she gets medical treatment or not, but they seem to think they do, and that is nonsense and that is the nature of tyranny. In the eyes of Barack Obama and the eyes of Kathleen Sebelius, this woman is nothing more than a number, and this woman has no emotional connection to Kathleen Sebelius and need not be given all the attention needed to care for her, and to Kathleen Sebelius, this woman--who is like a erotic woman--is a threat to Kathleen Sebelius if the woman is rebellious and is against the political ideology promoted and lived by by Barack Obama and Kathleen Sebelius. When a government offers medical treatment through monopoly, a person must expect sooner or later the person will have to follow the political ideology of the people offering the medical treatment or get no treatment, and so Kathleen Sebelius is evil since she promotes a government-run health-care system. This woman has feelings and wishes and hopes and has a drive to survive, but a government health-care system takes none of that into consideration, and what is top in the mind of those possibly providing treatment is the usefulness of the woman to the society--the good of the society (whatever that means)--as some type of "worker.".
The women who I like that are presented in this document may or may not be smart as I would define it, and they may or may not understand some lies about Social Security in the United States of America that Obama's women would probably talk about or talk up. In September 2011, Barack Obama introduced Americans to the American Jobs Act, and on thing that the bill contained was his proposal for a cut in the "payroll tax" to help the country create jobs (he had pushed for a reduction in the "payroll tax" in the past). Basically, money related to the "payroll tax" goes to the Social Security program in the country, and the money is used to, for example, pay people who are drawing--through retirement checks--on the Social Security System. So, Barack Obama proposed a dropping of the amount of money that would go into the fund. But there is something more defective about his idea. When a person pays less in "payroll tax" the less that gets credited to the person in determining what the person will get, for instance, as retirement money in the future. No, Barack Obama did not propose a drop in the "income tax" through the proposed act, and, in fact, Barack Obama proposed a rise in income taxes for some people. Yes, the concept of how defective Barack Obama's idea about dropping the "payroll tax" is is easy for a person to understand, and I do hope the women who I like that are presented in this document can understand it. [Note: The "American Jobs Act" was a scam and trick, since Barack Obama went around the country for weeks promoting the passing of it in the U.S. Congress, and although Barack Obama traveled around the country and promoted the proposed act as something that would not raise taxes, the proposed act really would increase taxes if it was passed, and also while Barack Obama was traveling around the country promoting the proposed act, it was clear it was not going to get passed in the U.S. Congress and, in fact, it was killed in the U.S. Senate on October 11, 2011--Barack Obama used the proposed act to travel around the country to campaign for reelection on taxpayer money and work to make Republicans look bad if the proposed act was not passed.]
This woman is the head of or is the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, a position she began to hold in 2009.
Remember: A pretty face can hide an evil mind, and here you have a smile of a truly ugly and evil woman, and I have some examples of what is in this woman, a woman chosen by Barack Obama to work with him, which shows more of the nature of Barack Obama. On March 6, 2011, Hilda Solis spoke--gave a speech--to a group known as National People's Action (a name that sounds like an entity found in a communist country), and the National People's Action reported (at its Web site) on August 30, 2011, that "National People's Action (NPA) is a Network of community power organizations from across the country that work to advance a national economic and racial justice agenda. NPA has over 200 organizers working to unite everyday people in cities, towns, and rural communities throughout the United States." By the way, for example, "economic justice" is a socialist's set of words that means to spread the wealth around--take it from some people and give it to, for instance, people who do nothing and want handouts from government--and National People's Action is based in Chicago, which is a hotbed of communism and socialism in the country and which is the most recent hometown for Barack Obama. On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, CNS News made available through its Web site words said by Hilda Solis in Washington, D.C., on the same day: "...No matter how you got here or how long you plan to stay, you have certain rights. You have the right to be safe and in a health workplace and the right to a legal wage. We gather here today to strengthen our shared commitment to protect the labor rights of migrant workers in the United States. Unfortunately, due to language barriers and immigration status, migrant workers can be those who are most vulnerably abused. We're committed to ending that abuse, and in a few moments, we'll sign new partnerships...."
On Sunday, September 4, 2011, the Detroit Free Press published a "commentary" piece written by Hilda Solis (Solis, Hilda. "Behind the numbers, people who need opportunities" Detroit Free Press, 4 September 2011, p. 21A.). Through the article, she noted that she was the "'top cop' on the workplace beat." and "I'm also 'America's job counselor,' making sure workers have the support service they need when times are tough, and championing work-family balance and flexibility." Her statements that are presented in the previous sentence are nonsense. Hilda Solis presented misleading information in her piece, such as by saying: "As of July, we've added nearly 2.4 million jobs to our economy over the past 17 months." Really, jobs were added, but jobs were lost, and since Barack Obama signed the "stimulus law" into law, there has been a net loss in jobs of about a two-million.
On Monday, September 5, 2011, Hilda Solis appeared at a Labor Day union event in downtown Detroit, at which Barack Obama appeared. One thing that she said is: "...I know what it means to be 'union proud.' It's a voice at the table to negotiate good wages, health benefits, and safe working conditions and a chance to step into the 'middle class.' It's about working hard. It's about taking care of each other. And it's fighting for what we know is right!...." I can argue well that Hilda Solis is so pro-union that the U.S. Department of Labor is not a department headed by a woman who would really have a balance between workers and businesses in the matters of making unions or removing unions, which workers have done in the past when unions have become defective--working against workers--and should have the right to do.
[Note: On the September 5, 2011, Jimmy Hoffa Jr. (the head of the Teamsters Union) was at the event with Hilda Solis in Detroit. In reference to people involved in the Tea Party movement, which is working to block the work of "enslavist" and would-be-dictator Barack Obama, Jimmy Hoffa Jr. said: "...Let's take these son-of-a-bitches out!...." The history of the Teamsters Union is filled with corruption and coercion and thugism and misuse of union dues.]
I ask myself--What is the reason to have a U.S. Department of Labor? The entity does not, for example, create jobs, or the purpose of it has nothing to do with creating jobs. On Friday, September 2, 2011, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported that, in essence, no jobs were created in August 2011 or there was no net increase or net decrease in jobs, and that is the first time such an occurance has happened since the 1940s. To hurt a country purposely, you have to destroy the job base and the number of people working--people who can produce things, which can become assets for a country--and, yes, Barack Obama's work to hurt the country is working.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 12:
So I got a surprise one day in July 2011--I was at the building for MEEMIC Insurance in Birmingham, Michigan, and I met a totally feminine Asian-type woman, who was wearing a dress, spoke like a woman, and walked like a woman. Yes, indeed, the woman was refreshing to me, as this woman I show here in this section is, and although all the women who I like that I present in photographs in this document I find most attractive, this one shown below is one of my top favorites. This Asian-type woman has female shape and long hair, which she could probably toss wonderfully, and she has that delightfully squishy look, making her seem soft and not like man, as exhibited in, for instance, Elena Kagan and Janet Napolitano. I wonder how many such woman exist yet in the United States of America--women who have that nice pleasant female look--and I wonder how many such women understand the danger to them from the Barack Obama women.
Let me show some facts presented by U.S. News and World Report on November 5, 2008, in an article entitled "Behind Obama's Victory: Women Open Up a Record Marriage Gap." In the article, it is noted that, of the women who voted in the election of November 2008, about seventy percent of the unmarried women voted for Barack Obama. That shows how ignorant or stupid or evil women in the United States of American can be, and of the women who were married at the time of the election and voted, about fifty percent voted for Barack Obama. By the way, men are not so smart, given that about forty-nine percent of the men who voted in the election voted for Barack Obama, and that means at least forty-nine percent of men were not good men--those who realized the evil that Barack Obama is and stood up to knock Barack Obama down and protect, for instance, the wonderful Asian-type gal who is presented in the photograph above this paragraph. But as I have hinted, the "feminist revolution" has led to many men becoming feminized, and such men can even be those who look tough riding their Harley-Davison motorcycles and yet in truth are soft in the head, and the many men who have become feminized have not the guts to at least tell others how defective Barack Obama is, saying, instead, maybe, "What can we do?" while sitting around drinking wine or beer with buddies, pretending they are tough to onlookers.
If you think about the statistics about how many men and women voted for Barack Obama in November 2008, you can see why a good man or a good woman--a person who is not an "enslavist" and does not support "enslavism" and who is a person who supports the ideas of The United States Constitution--can have a hard time finding a mate. Some people say that opposites attract in relation to marriage and mating, and I can even say that the Asian-type woman that I show in the photograph above is an opposite to me, since I am not Asian. However, conflict of political ideas between a married couple can lead to a horrific marriage, since "enslavism" is counter to "conservatism," which is the basis idea upon which the country was designed.
This woman is the second presented within this document who is a member of the U.S. Supreme Court, and she is, for one, a racist. This woman has supported the "La Raza" movement, which is a movement that puts down all other types of races, such as Asian, and the members of "La Raza" movement believe much of the western region of the United States of America should be united with at least Mexico to be a nation of Hispanic-type people. Because this woman supports "La Raza," you can expect she does not have at heart, for instance, the feelings of non-Hispanic women--not in the long run in relation to making decisions on court cases presented before the U.S. Supreme Court.
In 1986, on Good Morning America, which featured Joan Lunden as a co-host, who was talking about men and women in business, Sonya Sotomayor said: "There are different styles. Um, and because of those styles, I think that's what affects the ability of women to get ahead in the workplace." and "Well, I felt in my experiences that it's not that men are consciously discriminating against promoting women, but I do believe as people we have self images of what's good, and if you're a man that grew up professionally in a male-dominated profession, then your image of what a good lawyer is is a mirror image."
Look at two more main pieces of thought spoken by Sonya Sotomayor. At the University of California Berkeley School of Law in 2001, she said: "I would hope a wise Latina woman with the richest of her experience would be more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life..." And, in 2005, at Duke University Law school, then U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Sona Sotomayor said: "...Um, all of the legal-defense funds out there, um, they're looking people with court of appeals experience, because it is, court of appeals where policy is made--and I know and I know this is on tape and I should never say that, 'cause we don't make law. I know. Um...." [There was laughter from those around her at the time she was speaking.] "Ah, ah, I know, I know. I'm not, I'm not promoting...."
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 13:
This woman, like "A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 11," I have seen in a number of different photographs, and this woman, like "A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 11," is quite erotic looking--female erotic looking--and that is a good thing. So goes mating in the world! I am happy about that.
Oh, I have no idea where this woman lives. I hope she does not live in Chicago, Illinois, or in the Chicago area, Illinois. Chicago is a hotbed of communists, as is Harvard University, and many people tied to Barack Obama have ties to Chicago, such as Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama.
Let me show you what is in the head of U.S. Representative Maxine Waters (a Democrat related to California), and, by the way, a photograph of Maxine Waters is not presented in this document, since Barack Obama did not hire her to be in the job that she has, but Maxine Waters is another ugly Democrat. On August 20, 2011, Maxine Waters spoke before a public group in Inglewood, California. You should be aware people who might called themselves members of the Tea Party movement (which is not a political party) uphold the ways of The United States Constitution, which is, for one, designed to stop a person from becoming a dictator over the citizens of the country (the document has checks and balances and defines what, in essence, politicians can and cannot do), but Maxine Waters said: "...You can't be intimidated. You can't be frightened. As far as I'm concerned, the Tea Party can go straight to hell!...." These words spoken show off the mind of an ugly woman, and she is--as far as I am concerned--another ugly Democrat woman. I report that it is commonplace to hear ignorant thought and see defective people, such as wishy-washy Republicans (who are really semi-Democrats) on the Sunday morning talk shows on the broadcast networks, and on Sunday, September 4, 2011, the round-table discussion on Meet the Press with David Gregory (which is an NBC-TV weekly show) had a number of defective thinkers, such as Thomas Friedman (an economist who writes books and writes for The New York Times, who pushed on this day the idea that one reason for the economic problems of today is the end of the "Cold War," and Maxine Waters. Maxine Waters said a number of stupid things on that show, such as: "...One thing they're [or citizens are] really angry about is that fact that these call-centers are offshore, ah, where, for example, AT&T said--Well, if you give me my, ah, merger, I, I'll bring my call centers back. And they [citizens] feel as if the call centers should be brought back, that we should make it too expensive for our companies, our businesses to take these jobs offshore. They want the jobs...." In recent years, companies have been taking jobs to other countries, because the cost of doing business is being driven up in this country by the federal government through regulations and laws, especially under the Barack Obama administration, which is well known by business people, and yet Maxine Waters pushed the idea of forcing businesses to stay through regulations and penalties--that is tyranny. Yes, Maxine Waters is truly another ugly Democratic Party--communist party--woman.
In this document, the most defective and ugly woman associated with Barack Obama is Michelle Obama, and the reasons that I make that statement are many, and some are passed along to you in this section of the document. Do not let the smile on Michelle Obama's face persuade you to disregard the true nature of the woman. The question is: Why would anyone--any good man--want to be married to this woman and have sexual intercourse with this ugly woman?
Look at two pieces of thought. In 1971, a book entitled Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, which had been written by a communist named Saul Alinsky was published, and it is really an anti-individual book and pro-radical book or a book designed to help defective people take from others, and one portion of the book is: "...As an organizer, I start where the world is, as it is, not as I would like it to be. That we accept the world as it is does not in any sense weaken our desire to change it into what it should be -- it is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be...." At the Democratic National Convention on August 25, 2008, Michelle Obama said: "...And Barack stood up that day, and he spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about the world as it is and the world as it should be, and he said that, all too often we accept the distance between the two, and we settle for the world as it is even when it doesn't reflect our values and aspirations...."
The biggest problem with Michelle Obama is she married Barack Obama and then has stayed with Barack Obama as his wife for many years, and that means--by now--she should be well aware of the nature and mind of Barack Obama, since it is hard for a wife not to know the true nature of a man she marries, especially if the marriage is more than a few days long or a few weeks long. It is evident that Barack Obama is a defective man, since he continually lies to the American people (evidence of which exists in my document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama, which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document). It is evident that, for years, Barack Obama has wanted the country to have a national-health-care system or a universal-health-care system, in which the government determines who gets health care and who does not get health care and when a person might get health care, making a person a slave to the federal government and allowing the government to coerce a person into doing things that the person would not want to do or the government will not provide health care. It is evident that Barack Obama's nature supports political leaders who are dictators or are working hard to be dictators, such as by making friends with the Castro brothers (of Cuba), Hugo Chavez (the head of Venezuela), and Dilma Rousseff (the President of Brazil), supports the dictators in control of Iran over the good citizens of Iran, and supports the entity known as the Muslim Brotherhood, which is tied to terrorist groups and has gained power in the government of Egypt in mid-2011. It is evident that Barack Obama dislikes "whites," since, for one, the Barack Obama administration dropped criminal charges against members of the New Black Panthers related to election intimidation in 2009--the New Black Panthers are racists and against "whites"--and Barack has associates who are racists and race baiters, such Henry Gates (a professor at Harvard University) and Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Barack Obama sanctioned the starting of a court case related to an Arizona law focusing on immigration against Arizona, which is having trouble with dangerous illegal aliens who cross in to the state from Mexico, and some of those persons are drug runners and killers, and, in fact, a few parts of southern Arizona are sort of off limits to Americans because the federal government cannot guarantee the safety of Americans in those parts, and Barack Obama has not and does not send in troops to the parts to fully rid those parts of the invaders. Barack Obama has on several occasions embarrassed the heads of state of what have been allies of the country for years, such as the those of England (or Great Britain or the United Kingdom) and Israel, one of which was the undermining the Prime Minister of Israel through a speech given a short number of hours before the Prime Minister was to meet with Barack Obama in official meetings. Over the first two years or so of the Barack Obama administration, Barack Obama has ignored the plight of some people who have had problems with, for one, floods, making no good public comments, especially when the people were in states in which Barack Obama had not won through the election of November 2008. Barack Obama has in official public speeches put down or embarrassed or done hatchet-job actions on Republicans and the members of the U.S. Supreme Court (in the case of the U.S. Supreme Court, it was unceremoniously done during a State of the Union speech, an action that was unprecedented).
Michelle Obama is married to at least a man who can be called a "thug" or someone who acts like the head of a street gang, and, in fact, at times, through speeches, Barack Obama has talked like a gang leader, and yes Michelle Obama stays with him, and that shows that she has an ugly mind, willing to promote a defective man.
On February 18, 2008, Michelle Obama was involved in campaigning for Barack Obama to be elected the U.S. President, and she said a number of things that should not be forgotten by a good man. On February 18, 2008, Michelle Obama was in Madison, Wisconsin, and said: "...I don't think we've, we've seen that. But what we've learned over this year is that hope is makin' a come back. It is making a come back, and let me tell you somethin'--For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country, and not just because, Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change, and, ah, I have been desperate to see our country moving in that direction and just not feeling so alone in my frustration and disappointment...."and "...So, part of what Barack is saying is he needs you. He needs you not just to win, but he needs you for change. And he's gonna need you not just tomorrow, but in a year, in four years, in eight years, every step of the way, holding him accountable, holding each other accountable, and moving us to a different place. And the thing that I can guarantee you as his wife is that Barack will not be perfect president. He's said this himself. But what you can count on is that he will admit his mistakes, that he will work hard every day to narrow that gap of opportunity and to stop that bar from moving, 'cause that's the only reason he's in this--not to sit in the White House but to make life fair for folks so that they can reach for those little dreams that used to be there, so everybody has a stake in this nation. That's the only reason he's doing this. And you won't be disappointed. That I know...." Also on February 18, 2008, Michelle Obama was at UCLA and said: "...Don't get sick in this country--not here. Americans are in debt not because they live frivolously but because someone got sick. And even with insurance, the deductibles and premiums are so high that people are still putting medication and treatments on credit card, and they can get out from under. And I could go on and on and on, but this is how were living, people, in 2008, and things have gotten progressively worse...." and "...We have lost the understanding that, in a democracy, we have a mutual obligation to one another. That we cannot measure our greatness in the society by the strongest and richest of us, but we have to measure our greatness by the least of these. That we have to compromise and sacrifice for one another in order to get things done. That is why I am here, because Barack Obama is the only person in this race who understands that. That before we can work on the problems, we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation...." and "...So I am here right now, because I am married to the only person in this race who has a chance of healing this nation...." and "...Barack, as Oprah said, is one of the most brilliant men you will meet in our lifetime. Barack is more than ready. He'll be ready today. He'll be ready on day one. He'll be ready in a year from now, five years from now. He is ready. That is not the question. The question is--What are we ready for?...." and "...Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism, that you put down your divisions, that you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone, that you push yourself to be better, and that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual--uninvolved, uninformed...."
I say that, on February 18, 2011, Michelle Obama spoke nonsense and attempted to teach nonsense, and, here, I show some of the nonsense and explain the nonsense. I argue that the soul of the United States of America is, for one, The United States Constitution, and it is not broken, but enslavists are working to make it passé so that they can be enslavists--tell others what to do, even if they must use force and violence, as thugs do, and, certainly, no one person is the "soul" of a nation, which is made up of many souls--persons--most of whom have not lot their souls or their moral values. I say that no one person can "heal this nation" and that people should not expect one person can heal any nation, since that comes down to putting some person above all others, like a king or a something put on the Earth especially by a god, and what Michelle Obama is trying to convince you to believe is Barack Obama is some special being. I say that, since Barack Obama is no special being, he cannot make "life fair for folks," as no man in history has ever been able to do. I say that Barack Obama is no brilliant man, and, for example, the way he speaks when not on a teleprompter is evidence, but he may be smart at tearing things down, hurting people, and being what a thug is, and a thug puts the self first. I say that Barack Obama, by lying in every speech, is keeping people uninformed, and, since at least January 20, 2011, Barack Obama has proved Michelle Obama's statement is nonsense. I say, it seems, Barack Obama has never made a mistake, given that I have never heard him admitting have made mistakes. I say that, in a "democracy," we do not have a mutual obligation to one another--for example, it is not my obligation to support you if you wish to void taking care of yourself, such as your health, and make others pay for your living, and, anyway, "democracy" has to do with politics and voting--having everyone able to take part (with some restrictions, such as that based on age) and does not have anything to do with an a so-called "obligation" that a person is supposed to have for another person or all other persons. I say that I do not have to "sacrifice" for another to "get things done"; for one, "sacrifice"--as I believe it means to Michelle Obama (another "enslavist")--means that I must give up something so that the government can do for people who wish to do nothing and want something from the government or others. I say that the "different place" in Michelle Obama's statement is not an actual location, it is a communistic/socialistic state of government, which is not the United States of America as it has been, and it shows that Michelle Obama dislikes the United States of America, as is evident by her saying--"Don't get sick in this country--not here...."
Note: It seems to me, since February 18, 2011, Michelle Obama has been guarded about what she says publicly, because the words that she spoke on this day were not necessarily well received by good people, but then again maybe she has been not guard.
Since January 20, 2011, Michelle Obama has been involved in pressing for more government control of what children eat in schools, such as by providing more meals to children in schools and working to block what parents may give their children to take in to schools as lunch. On Monday, October 17, 2011, Michelle Obama was at the White House for the Healthier U.S. School Challenge Celebration, and at one point, she said: "...When many kids spend half of their working hours and get up to half of their daily calories at school, you know that with the food you serve and more importantly the lessons you teach that you're not just shaping their habits and preferences today, you're affecting the choices they're going to make for the rest of their lives. That's why we start with kids. Right? We can affect who they will be forever...." Adolph Hitler took up propagandizing the minds of children and taking control of children from parents in, for example, the 1930s, and the Chinese communists took control of children in the mid-1900s at least, and it seems to be a lesson that others tied to government know well and are using.
Michelle Obama is just another thug's woman--an ugly woman, who lies and spouts propaganda.
It is hard to describe what life is or what the world around us is, but to some people, life or the world is all a game or a mirage or is all in the person's mind, and based on that idea, the person can do what the person wishes with all others, hurting them or killing them or making them suffer, and that is what is in the mind that is defective and dangerous.
A Woman Who I Like--Woman Number 14:
Yes, I have seen brown-skin erotics, one of which was a The Home Depot in the Royal Oak area of Michigan, and I present one here--a woman posing as a woman and not a man-like creature.
No matter what color skin that a woman has, a good man has to realize that women, especially young women, are more susceptible than men are to take up believing some savior--in the form of a politician--can come an save the world--such as eliminate poverty (whatever "poverty" means) and make everything right. That comes about since women are more emotion-based and nuture-based than men are, which is the way of nature (and the develop of the female brain and mind and the species over centuries), and even good women can be duped by an "enslavist" (such as a socialist and communist) and the ideas of the enslavism. One reason the "enslavist" promotes the self as being more "compassionate" than so-and-so is is to ensnare women and have them that up with what the enslavist is doing, and a good man must keep that fact about women in mind and work to counter the nonsense of the enslavist, especially the idea that a single man--a politician--can make the world right and make everything equal, though the single man did not create nature and is only one really, really small part of nature
Guys, is not the photograph refreshing? She does not look like a the cliché plumber in male form, that fat guy who wears baggy pants and allow his the upper portion of his butt to show when he bends over. Does she not look like a woman who should be wearing a summer cotton dress (and nothing more) and walking along side you so that you can show her off, which cannot happen in places like Detroit, where communists and socialists and black radicals since the 1960s have let gangs and youth thugs become rulers of the streets and have let discipline go by the wayside, but I know places where a guy can take such a woman as this on a pleasant walk and show her off.
[Note: If it would have been possible, I would have loved to show off another extremely wonderful brown-skin woman--a woman named Deserea--who is in my mind, but I cannot get everything wanted in life, as you cannot, especially if you think it will come from a government savior.]
I have shown you fourteen woman who have close ties with Barack Obama and work with Barack Obama, and what they are and what they have in their minds helps define what Barack Obama is, and while campaigning to be the U.S. President in 2008, Barack Obama said: "...Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself...." You should be asking yourself--What type of man likes to keep around ugly woman--ugly because of what is in their minds? Well, maybe, Barack Obama dislikes women--at least good women, who should be disgusted to know what he really is. Barack Obama may like his women, mostly because of their beliefs, but men, especially young men, must learn or be taught to recognize such ugly women--ugly because of their minds--and take up exposing their ugliness and not remain silent about their ugliness.
I nearly end by noting that pretty women or seductive women or beautiful women can be stupid and dangerous, and I show a good example of that idea here. The last woman that I show is quite a striking woman--she is Brazilian. In March 2011, Barack Obama went to Brazil to meet with the President of Brazil (Dilma Rousseff), who had been in years past a Marxist gorilla fighter and who is a communist today, and he showed up a few days after the famous annual festival had taken place in Brazil, but the photograph that is show is not from 2011, it is from the festival of 2009. Notice what is showing on the left leg of the woman in the photograph.
Yes, ugliness is mostly in the mind, and women with ugly minds is what Barack Obama seems to attract!
By the way, fortunately for me, the woman of Brazil that I have presented is not an American, so she cannot cast a vote for Barack Obama in November 2012 and hurt the United States of America and me.
To end, I say--If you are man who would not work to protect the women who I like and show off in this document, you are not much of a man, and, in fact, I would report to such a man to his face--You are a piece of crap. These days I wonder where how many real men are left, having seen so many who talk softly, as girls do (which is pleasant for girls), and speak in wishy-washy terms and sentences, though they might seem physically tough looking. If you are a good man, you should take on such crappy women as those that I have presented in this document and be not afraid to criticize them in public and to friends, and you should not worry about whether or not you are being confrontational or politically correct or worry that you might be seen as not being nice to women or not respectful of women. The bad women shown in this document and women like them have to be taken out of their jobs and kept out of such jobs, knowing lives of good women are at stake. It is the job of a good man to protect good women, and if you do not take up the job heartily you are a piece of garbage, and if you do not take of the challenge of fighting for the types of women who I like then you are no match for me and you are my enemy.
Okay, real guys, try Deserea:
Is she not someone to protect
against Barack Obama and
Barack Obama's ugly women?
"Anita Dunn." Wikipedia.com, 6 July 2011.
"Anita Dunn: Fox News An Outlet For GOP Propaganda." The Huffington Post, 11 October 2009, 12:30 p.m. (updated: 11 October 2009, 2:41 p.m.).
"Carol Browner." Wikipedia.com, 25 August 2011.
"Elena Kagan." Wikipedia.com, 11 August 2011.
"Elizabeth Warren." Wikipedia.com, 24 September 2011.
"GOP: No 'Joke" for North Carolina Governor to Suggest Suspending Elections." Fox News, 28 September 2011.
"Hilda Solis." Wikipedia.com, 2 September 2011.
"Janet Napolitano." Wikipedia.com, 1 September 2011.
"Kathleen Sebelius." Wikipedia.com, 26 August 2011.
"Lisa P. Jackson." Wikipedia.com, 1 September 2011.
"Michelle Obama." Wikipedia.com, 27 August 2011.
"More United Nations Corruption." Corruption Chronicles (a Judicial Watch blog), 21 October 2008, 2:01 p.m.
"Oil-for-Food Programme." Wikipedia.com, 14 September 2011.
"Rebecca Blank." Wikipedia.com, 2 September 2011.
"Samantha Power." Wikipedia.com, 25 August 2011.
"Sonia Sotomayer." Wikipedia.com, 17 August 2011.
"Susan Rice." Wikipedia.com, 19 August 2011.
"United Nations." Wikipedia.com, 27 September 2011.
"The U.N. sex-for-food scandal." The Washington Times, 9 May 2006.
"Valerie Jarrett." Wikipedia.com, 2 August 2011.
"Valerie Jarrett re: Van Jones: 'We are so delighted to recruit him into the WH.'" Citizens Against ProObama Media Bias, 6 September 2009.
"Van Jones." Wikipedia.com, 4 August 2011.
Baldwin Steve. "Obama Surrounds Himself with the Most Extreme Appointees in American History." 1 September 2011.
Dinan, Stephen. "Obama climate czar has socialist ties." The Washington Times, 12 January 2009.
Garber, Kent. "Behind Obama's Victory: Women Open Up a Record Marriage Gap." U.S. News World Report, 5 November 2008.
Garcia, Berenice. "California high school teacher punishes students for saying 'God Bless You'." The New York Daily News, 30 September 2011, 8:10 p.m.
Grad, Shelby. "Rep. Maxine Waters: 'The tea party can go straight to hell.'" Los Angeles Times, 20 August 2011, 8:55 a.m.
Grenell, Richard. "Where Has Susan Rice, Our Ambassador, Been This Past Year? Biggovernment.com, 22 January 2010, 9:59 a.m.
Hallowell, Billy. "Obama Appoints 'Responsibility to Protect' Champion Samantha Power to Chair Genocide Panel." The Blaze, 24 April 2012, 12:27 p.m.
Hoft, Jim. "If Obama Administration Really Expects to Create Jobs Why Is Labor Secretary Solis Speaking at Anti-Capitalist Rallies?" Thegatewaypundit.com, 2 August 2011.
Kevin. ""WSJ Reporters in Talks with CNBS?" Mediabistro.com (or TVNewser), 11 March 2010, 6:28 p.m.
Klein, Aaron. "Communist sympathizer introduced top advisor?" WorldNetDaily.org, 8 September 2009, 4:57 p.m. Eastern.
Klein, Aaron. "More evidence ties Obama to socialist party." WorldNewDaily.com, 21 October 2010, 12:35 a.m. Eastern.
Kovack, Joe. "Sonia Sotomayor 'LaRaza member.'" WorldNetDaily.com, 27 May 2009, 11:20 p.m. Eastern.
Martin, Anthony (of Columbia Conservative Examiner). "Obama: 'Judge me by the people who surround me.'" Examiner.com, 3 September 2009.
Nake Emperor News. "OBAMA'S SENIOR ADVISOR VALERIE JARRETT: THE POINT OF GOVERNMENT IS TO GIVE PEOPLE A LIVELIHOOD SO THEY CAN PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILIES." The Blaze, 29 September 2011, 7:01 a.m.
Rosett, Claudia. "How Corrupt Is the United Nations?" Canada Free Press, 4 April 2006.
Note: On Monday, August 29, 2011, I was the Web page entitled "Carol Browner" that belonged to DiscoverTheNetworks.org.
Note: On Thursday, September 1, 2011, I saw the YouTube video entitled "Susan Rice, US vetoes UN resolution on Israeli Settlements [MIRROR]", which had a February 18, 2011, interview between Al Jazeera English and Susan Rice.
Note: On Thursday, September 1, 2011, I saw an article written by Rick Moran at frontpagemag.com, and the article had not date listed, and the piece focuses on Susan Rice.
Note: On Friday, September 2, 2011, I saw the Web page called "Van Jones" at the Web site for DiscoverTheNetworks.org.
Note: On Friday, September 2, 2011, I saw the YouTube available video entitled "Obama: Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself.'4"., which is a video featuring Glenn Beck, the television-show host.
Note: On Sunday, September 4, 2011, I went to a Web site called "Wake Up America," and I saw an article with video of Janet Napolitano, and the piece was entitled "Facts Vs Janet Napolitano RE: Muslim Men Under 35," and the writer given credit was Susan Duclos, and the piece was dated June 10, 2011, and the time stamp was 11:03 a.m.
Note: On Monday, September 5, 2011, I saw the YouTube-available video entitled "Kansas Governor Endorses Barack Obama."
Note: On Tuesday, September 6, 2011, I saw the You Tube-available video entitled "Judge Sonia Sotomayor; Curt is Where Policy is Made."
Note: On Tuesday, September 6, 2011, I saw the You Tube-available video entitled "Sotomayor 1986: I Found Men Unconsciously Discriminate Against Women."
Note: On Saturday, October 1, 2011, I visited the Web page related to The American Presidency Project (particularly Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley) entitled "Hillary Clinton, 2008 Democratic Presidential Candidate: U.S. Senator. Remarks - Modern progressive vision: Shared prosperity. May 29, 2007."
Note: On Wednesday, May 2, 2012, I came across the press release entitled "ZOA Opposes Appointment of Anti-Israel Samantha Power to Head New Atrocities Prevention Board," which had been issued by the Zionist Organization of America on April 27, 2012 and which had Morton A. Klein llisted as the contact person.
Note: This document was originally posted on the Internet on October 12, 2011.
Note: This document is known on the Internet as www.hologlobepress.com/ugly.htm.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Conservatism for
Children and What Conservatism Means,
which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Lessons for Children
about Politics and Dangerous People,
which can be reached by using this
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Madness in a President
and Other Matters of a Defective Mind,
which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled Nonsense Statements
and Quotations of Barack Obama, which
can be reached by using this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled THE CRUD AROUND
BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds
Get Together", which can be reached by
using this link: Crud.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled A Little History of
Barack Obama Events: A Show of
Deconstruction, which can be reached by
using this link: History.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Never Forget These
Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the
Individual in the United States of
America, which can be reached by
using this link: Media.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled World Tyranny:
Warnings about the Insane Who are
Trying to Create a Communist World
Country, which can be reached by
using this link: World.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled "La Raza": Yet Another
Enemy in the United States of America,
which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Illegal Aliens and
Immigration: The Focus is Protecting
the Home--The United States of
America, which can be reached by
using this link: Illegal.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled National Health
Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons
it is a Dead Issue, which can be
reached by using this link: Health.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The Next Elections:
What Has to be Done to Protect the
United States of America, which can
be reached by using this link: Elections.
Note: Many other documents exist at the
Web site for The Hologlobe Press that will
give you information about the bad that Barack
Obama and his associates are doing to the
United States of America, such as the Michigan
Travel Tips documents and the T.H.A.T.
documents that have been published since
the fall of 2008.
To get to the Site-Summary Page for The
Site-Summary Page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may use this link: Summary.
To get to the main page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may click on this link now: