Nonsense Statements
and Quotations
of Barack Obama
 

compiled by
 

Victor Edward Swanson,
publisher
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan  49721

(April 9, 2013)

    During the last few years of the U.S. President George W. Bush administration, such as in 2006, 2007, and 2008, it was commonplace for David Letterman to present during his late-night television show, which was The Late Show with David Letterman and which was shown on CBS-TV, clips of U.S. President George W. Bush's making misspeaks and slips of the tongue, and the presentations were done to make U.S. President George Bush look stupid, and some people could argue well that the tactic helped persuade young people that U.S. President George W. Bush was stupid, but the presentations also showed that David Letterman supported socialism and Marxism--if not also hardline communism--since David Letterman supported Barack Obama, who, it was shown by some broadcasters, had ties to communists (such as William Ayers and William Ayers' wife) and to other ugly minded people (such as Reverend Jeremiah Wright).  Incidentally, other programs that attempted to make U.S. President George W. Bush look stupid were This Week with George Stephanopoulos (particularly George Stephanopoulos with his weekly "Sunday Funnies" segment) and The Daily Show (particularly Jon Stewart).  Since 2008, it has been commonplace for Barack Obama--when not using a teleprompter to help him--to make statements that show he is a Marxist or socialist and had a mind that is filled with nonsense thoughts, but, for instance, David Letterman has not shown to his audience the dangerous thoughts presented by Barack Obama, who, to my thinking, is much more dangerous to the individual than U.S. President George W. Bush was ever proposed to be by, for example, Mitch Albom (of The Mitch Albom Program, a syndicated radio show) and others in the media.  This document is a collection of statements and quotations of Barack Obama, and the statements and quotations are not those that already exist in other documents of mine that are available through the Web site of The Hologlobe Press, such as Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America and THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man (links to which exist at the end of this document).  Here is some what Barack Obama has said in public (and within the brackets are comments from me):
 

    [Note: In the world of writing and journalism, when you see "[" and then "]", the material presented between the "[" and the "]" is text written by the author of the document in which they exist, and the text adds comments or makes some idea clear or clearer.]
 

    Friday, January 9, 2009:
        "...Ah, so, ah, eh, eh, eh,...eh...ah, wah, one of the things that I think I'm trying to communicate in this process is for everybody to get past, ah, the habit that sometimes occurs in Washington--ah, whose idea is it, ah, what ideological corner does it come from?--just show me.  If, if you can show me that something's gonna work, I will welcome it.  If it works better than something that I've proposed, I'll welcome it...."  [This collection of words was not a prepared set of words, and it shows how he thinks and talks on the fly or in ad-lib moments.]
    "...people who want full-time work but are only able to get part-time work.  Clearly, the situation is dire. It is deteriorating, and it demands urgent and immediate action.  But let me be clear, today's job report only underscores the need for us to move with a sense of urgency and common purpose...."  [He notes that they should  move with the "common purpose," which is a socialist's thought.]

    Wednesday, January 15, 2009:
    "...Well, I think he's embarrassed about it.  There's but we knew about this before, ah, before we nominated him.  It was an innocent mistake, a common mistake that's made, but here's the bottom line--Nobody denies that he's uniquely qualified for this job, that he has more experience than in dealing with international crises, he's been uniformly praised by Republicans and Democrats and by the marketplace and so, ah, um, I, I'm confident he will be confirmed, and I'm confident he will do an outstanding job...."    [He responded to Katie Couric, who was talking about the proposed appointment of Timothy Geithner to the position of Treasury Secretary--Timothy Geithner had failed to pay federal income taxes between about 2001 and 2004.  The U.S. Treasury Secretary oversees the Internal Revenue Service.  Barack Obama picked a flawed man and shows bad judgement; Barack Obama had showed bad judgement in the spring of 2008 by picking Jim Johnson (who was, for instance, the CEO at Fannie Mae from 1991 to 1998) to take part in Barack Obama's vice-presidential selection process, and that man had to resign because of bad press about his background during the election-campaign season for the November 2008 election.]

    [Note: It is reported here that on Tuesday, January 20, 2009, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts led Barack Obama through the "oath of office" ritual in Washington, D.C., and, on that day, the ritual failed to go off smoothly, since, for one, Barack Obama stepped on John Robert's line of "I, Barack Hussein Obama, do...." (and it seems very likely to me that the ritual between the two men will not get much repeat exposure in audio form or video-and-audio form in the future).]

    Tuesday, January 20, 2009 (from his inaugural speech):
    "...That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood.  Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred.  Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age...."  [My document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man shows the lie.  The problem was not caused by any "collective failure" (which is a socialist's garbage set of words).  The federal government was the underlying cause, related to practices at least of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and even Barney Frank (who is a Democrat quoted in my document) said it was.  And, really, the statements make up a nonsense theme.  Incidentally, Barack Obama made a speech that was not uplifting, and, in essence, during the entire speech, he was stern looking, and, overall, the speech was flat, and he simply ran off cliches and platitudes, and, to me, it was unknown what he meant though many of his thoughts, and there were times he seemed to expect clapping from the audience, and he did not get it   His batch of statements within the quotations of this section is garbage and a lie.]
    "...On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.  On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations, and worn-out dogmas, that for too long have strangled our politics.  We remain a young nation, but, in the words of scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things...."  [This statement hopes to urge politicians with opposing views--especially non-communists and non-socialists, such as true Republican-type politicians--to not fight back and oppose bad ideas of his and the Democrats or socialists or communists.  There must be conflict when garbage ideas are proposed.  Some people do not want conflict, but I am not adverse to having good politicians not reach across the aisle to support the bad of politicians with bad ideas, even if nothing gets done.  And the citizens of the country should hope there is conflict in the U.S. Congress and hope people stand up for the real rights of the individual as noted in the U.S. Constitution.]
    "...But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions--that time has surely passed.  Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America...."  [Exactly what about the country does he want to "remake"?  Barack Obama has already provided a statement that notes that he dislikes the U.S. Constitution, and I note his statement in my document entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America.]
    "...We will restore science to its rightful place...."  [Barack Obama says that science will be restored to "its rightful place," but he uses bad science about "global warming" or "climate change" in making decisions and policies about energy.  For more information about scientists who disagree with the "global warming" idea or the "climate change idea, you should see my document entitled Michigan Travel Tips #57, which can be reached at this link: Travel #57.]
    "...Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans.  Their memories are short.  For they have forgotten what this country has already done; what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage.  What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them--that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply...."  [What are the plans?  What "stale political arguments" is he talking about?  He presented more nonsense.]
    "...Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill.  Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control--the nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous.  The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our Gross Domestic Product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on the ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart--not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good...."  [What nonsense his thought about "a watchful eye" is.  The federal government's watchful eye on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae failed; both entities are watched over by--mostly--the U.S. Congress of the United States of America, since it is the U.S. Congress that controls the creation of spending bills and financial bills and watches over the finances of the country.].
    "...And so to all the other peoples in governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born, know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity and we are ready to lead once more...."  [The United States of America has never stopped leading in the cause of freedom and democracy!  His statement is nonsense.]
    "..With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back the specter of a warming planet...."  [This is more nonsense about "global warming" or climate change."]
    "...To the people of the poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds.  And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to the suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect.  For the world has changed, and we must change with it...." [This collection of words is great nonsense.  For decades and decades, the United States of America has poured money into and given help to other countries of the world, such as after natural disasters.  It is impossible to help all people, such as by just giving away money, since, for one, some countries for decades have had dictators or communist or socialist regimes that have suppressed peoples and purposely failed to create economies and products, and the countries have sucked the spirits of life out of the peoples, who might otherwise grow societies.  The United States of America does use resources, because it does things and creates things--from new medicines to products--that make the lives of individuals throughout the world better.  And what do "the world has changed" and "we must change with it" mean?  How has the world changed?  This nation is yet a nation based on individuals with individual freedoms guaranteed by he U.S. Constitution.  Barack Obama talks garbage!]

    Friday, January 30, 2009 (in a press statement):
    "...So, if we're gonna be having conversations as this process moves forward directly with these folks on Wall Street, eh, eh, underscore that they have to start acting in a more responsible fashion if, ah, if we are ta, together, ah, get this economy rolling again.  Ah, there will be time for them to make profits and there will be time for them to get bonuses.  Now is not that time...."  [Barack Obama is taking upon himself to determine when and when not companies can make profits and give out bonuses.  It looks as if Barack Obama is starting the process in which the federal government will become the entity that determines the pay for managers of companies and other employees of companies.  And that is bad.  The government should not be involved in telling companies what amounts to pay anyone.]

    Monday, February 9, 2009 (in his first news conference):
    [On this date, Barack Obama gave a press conference that started at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, and he began with a long statement, and then he took thirteen questions from reporters, and, on this day, as it is said in the entertainent business, during the question-and-answer segment (which lasted at least 45 minutes) he "bombed"--he rambled, stuttered, stalled, lost his train of thought, promoted fear, gave misinformation about a big "stimulus" package being debated in the Congress, et cetera--and there was so much nonsense from him that I am loss as to what quotes from the question-and-answer session to present.]

    Wednesday, February 18, 2009 (in Arizona, talking about a new plan for foreclosures):
    "...The plan I'm announcing focuses on rescuing families who played by the rules and acted responsibly..."
    "...By refinancing loans for millions of families in traditional mortgages who are under water or close to it by modifying loans for families stuck in sub-prime mortgages they can't afford as a result of sky-rocketing interest rates or personal misfortune..."
    "...So here's what my plan does, establishes clear guidelines for the entire mortgage industry that will encourge lenders to modify mortgages on primary residences..."
    "...Any institution that wishes to receive financial, ins.., assistance from the government, from taxpayers, and to modify home mortgages will have to do so according to these guidelines which will be in place two weeks from today..."
    "...Solving this crisis will require more than resources, it'll require all of us to step back and take responsibility--government has to take responsibility for setting rules of the road that are fair and fairly enforced..."
    "...It will not be easy, but if we more forward with purpose and resolve, with a deepened appreciation of how fundamental the American dream is and how fragile it can be when we fail to live up our collective responsibilities...."
    [A lot of people did not act responsibly, since they took on loans that they could not possibly pay back (they should have remained renters).  At this time (February 2009), home-mortgage-loan interest rates are stable and are not rising greatly.  And he is pushing that the government is going set all the standards and control the mortgage industry, which has done well for decades and decades--the industry was gummed up by federal government policies, such as those related to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  What does he mean by "...all of us have to step back and take responsibility..."?  That is garbage, since most people who took out mortgage loans were responsible.   And what the heck is the idea about living up to "...our collective responsiblities..."?  (The idea of "collective responsibilities" is Marxist garbage.)  Barack Obama told lies and offered garbage, especially the part about forcing lenders of mortgage-loan money to change their contracts and the part about making the American public subsidize the people that were given loans that they should not have been given.]

    [Note: It was on Thursday, February 19, 2009, that Rick Santelli (who had experience in investing, who was at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and who was shown on camera) made these statements and others on a television show entitled Squawk Box, which was shown on CNBC):
    "...I've been glued to it, because Mr. Ross' nailed it. You know, the government is promoting bad behavior because we certainly don't want to put stimulus forth and give people a whooping eight or ten dollars in their check and think that they ought to save it.  And in terms of modifications, I'll tell you what, I have an idea, you know the, the new administrations' big on computers and technology--How 'bout this, president and new administration, why don't you put up a Web site, have people vote on the Internet as a referendum, to see if we really want to subsidize the losers' mortgages or would we like to at least buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people that might have a chance to actually prosper down the road and reward people that can carry the water, instead of drink the water?...."
    "...This is America!  How many of you people want to pay for your neighbors' mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can't pay their bills?  Raise their hands!...."
    "....President Obama, are you listening?...."]

    [Note: While you go through this material, watch how Barack Obama makes a statement and then uses something like "but" or "on the other hand" to lead into another statement, a tactic that is used the down play the first statement and push the second statement.]

    Late February 2009:
    "...While we must add to our deficits in the short term to provide immediate relief to families and get our economy moving, it is only by restoring fiscal disipline over the long-run that we can produce sustained growth and shared prosperity...."  [This statement is nonsense.  Around this time, the federal government under the direction of  Barack Obama had already passed laws spending at least--at least--one-trillion-and-a-half dollars (a big portion of which was related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which was not a "job-creation" bill as it was professed to be by Barack Obama and was filled with "pork" spending), and the U.S. Congress was working on an "Omnibus Spending Bill" of about 500-billion dollars, and Barack Obama was putting forth his regular annual spending budget for the coming year, which was initially proposed to be well over one-trillion dollars--at least 3.6-trillion dollars.  And he had recently conducted a "Fiscal Responsibility Summit," which was bureaucratic nonsense and a useless government-planning event, since the laws that were passed, as would be the laws expected to be passed soon, had much that was truly irresponsible.]

    Tuesday, February 24, 2009 (in address to the U.S. Congress):
    "...Finally, because we're also suffering from a deficit of trust, I am committed to restoring a sense of honesty and accountability to our budget...."   [This statement was only one of the many statements that Barack Obama offered during this event, and what a piece of garbage it was, given how much he had already spent through laws that he had signed and would soon spend through laws that he would sign.]

    Saturday, February 28, 2009:
    "...I realize that passing this budget won't be easy, because it represents real and dramatic change, it also represents the threat to the status quo in Washington [Washington, D.C.]..."
    "...I know that the insurance industry won't like the idea that they'll have to bid competitively to continue to offer Medicare coverage..."
    "...That's how we'll preserve and protect Medicare and lower health-care costs for American families.  I know that banks and big student lenders won't like the idea that we're ending their huge taxpayer subsidies, but that's how well save taxpayers nearly 50-billion dollars and make college more affordable..."
    "...I know that oil and gas companies won't like us ending nearly 30-billion dollars in tax breaks, but that's how we'll help fund a renewable energy economy that will create new jobs and new industries..."
    "...The system we have now might work for the powerful and well-connected interests that run Washington [Washington, D.C.] for far too long, but I don't..."
    "...I came to provide the sweeping change that this country demanded when it went to the polls in November...."
    [What does he mean by the "status quo" in the first piece of text?  What it the nonsense about "bid competitively" in the second piece of text?  He talks about saving 50-billion dollars (which is a figure that I wonder whether or not is true, since he is--in my mind--a perpetual liar), and yet he is putting into law spending plans and budgets that cost trillions and trillions of dollars, which will lead to big debt for future generations and high inflation.  The fourth piece of text is simply garbage, and, in fact, creating a renewable energy economy is flat out false and impossible.  And what, as noted in the fifth piece of text, are the "powerful and well-connected interests," given the U.S. Congress has been controlled by Democrats for a little over two years?  In November 2008, Barack Obama did not win a stunning win, and, certainly, most people who voted did not vote for sweeping changes that involve "Marxixm" and "socialism," focusing on hurting and attacking businesses--big and small--and purposely working to lower the value of the stock market, which hurts retirement plans of all individuals in the country.  (By the way, Barack Obama got 52.7 percent of the vote, which is no mandate to make a change to Socialism or Marxism.)]

    [Note: By this time, ever since Barack Obama took the office of the President of the United States of America, the stock market has gone down (several thousands in points), and that shows investors--of all types--think the economic steps taken by the Barack Obama administration are worthless and defective, and, in fact, some individuals seems to believe he wants the stock market to go down, since he is working to hurt the private sector or the business community in the United States of America, and he has yet to say anything positive or good about the business community of the country.]

    Tuesday, March 3, 2009:
    "...What I'm looking at is not the day-to-day gyrations of the stock market, but the long term, ah, ability for the United States and the entire world economy to regain its strength, and, you know, the stock market is sort of like a track and poll in politics, it's bobs up and down day to day, and if you spend all your time worrying about that, then you're probably going to get the long-term strategy wrong...."  [This thought comes from the mind of a dangerous man, given the stock market has been going down steadily since Barack Obama became the president of the U.S.A., and, on March 3, 2009, the stock market was at the lowest level in twelve years.  Barack Obama has done nothing to give investors confidence in the stock market, such as by saying some non-socialist or non-Marxist thought, and that should show you that he wishes the stock market to go down to hurt everyone.  So many people are being hurt by Barack Obama as their retirement investments disappear.]

    Tuesday, March 3, 2009:
    "...Buying stocks is a potentially good deal if you've got a long-term prospective on it...."  [Barack Obama is a liar!  To date, he has done nothing that is good for the stock market--his policies and proposals are anti-business and even anti-business in relation to small businesses, such as dress shops, broaching-machine shops, tire stores, hair salons, paint stores, and such, especially for places like Detroit, where politicans have not promoted business for decades and have dead cities.  Barack Obama has spent billions and billions of dollars on nonsense projects and deadly programs, such as the beginnings of a national-health-care system (found under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009), which will end up hurting millions of Americans, as has happened to citizens in England through the national-health-care program in England, because of the drop in the number of dentists and doctors, the rationing of medicine, and the rationing of care, especially to the elderly.]

    Thursday, March 5, 2009:
    "...There are a lot of people out there who are desperate.  There's a lot of desperation out there.  Today, I want them and the people like them across this country to know that I have not forgotten them.  We have not forgotten them!  They are why we're here today--to start delivering the change they demanded at the polls in November, that they have continued to demand since the election, and if we're successful, if we can pass comprehensive reform, these folks will see their costs come down, they'll get the care they need, and we'll help our businesses create jobs again, so our economy can grow...."
   "...If we want to create jobs and rebuild our economy and get our federal budget under control, then we have to address the crushing costs of health care this year--in this administration.  Make investments in reform now, investments that will dramatically lower costs, won't add to our budget deficits in the long term.  Rather it is one of the best ways, in fact, maybe, the only way to reduce those long-term costs...."
    [The two paragraphs are filled with lies and defective thought.  Consider: To reduce health-care costs, a person does not spend more money on health-care, as Barack Obama is proposing; to reduce health-care costs, a person should, for example, reduce corruption and fraud in in the Medicare system (such as by getting rid of false claims) and reduce the regulatory paper work involved in the hospital industry.  Barack Obama wants to spend trillions of dollars (gained through taxes) on health care and a new health-care system, and how does spending trillions of dollars reduce costs?  Government entities are always wasteful!  His proposal is nonsense.  How does spending trillions of dollars on health care create jobs and get the economy moving--all the types of businesses that make up America create jobs and get the economy moving, if not hindered through defective laws, such as those enacted by Barack Obama or proposed by Barack Obama.  Is it not nice that Barack Obama, a liar, as can be proven in the material presented in this document, is thinking of you ("...I have not forgotten them....)?]
       "...Medical costs, Medicare costs are consuming our federal budget.  I don't have to tell members of Congress this.  Medicaid is overwhelming our state budgets.  I don't need to tell govenors and state legislatures that.  At the fiscal summit that we held here last week, the one thing on which everyone agreed was that the greatest threat to America's fiscal health is not Social Security, though that is a significant challenge, it's not the investments that we've made to rescue our economy during this crisis, by a wide margin, the biggest threat to our nation's balance sheet is the skyrocketing cost of health care.  It's not even close!  That's why we cannot delay this discussion any longer...."  [Barack Obama is not interested in a discussion, since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 already has the initial workings of a national-health-care system--Barack Obama bypassed everyone in the health-care community or system, such as doctors, hospital operators, and patients, in any discussion as to what should be done to better things.  Barack Obama is already working on setting up a health-care system based on the former U.S. Senator Tom Daschle's health-care model, which is defective thought.  Barack Obama presented more nonsense and lies.  And did you notice that Barack Obama mentioned the fiscal summit (officially, the "Fiscal Responsibility Summit")?   The summit was a sham, since Barack Obama had already spent billions and billions and billions of dollars--really, several trillions of dollars--unwisely and recklessly (the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was pushed through the U.S. Congress and signed into law on February 17, 2009, without almost any person having read the entire document, which was well over one-thousand-pages long).  Will not spending trillions of dollars on health care by the federal government, which never does anything efficiently, tax citizens and businesses greatly, and is it not then skyrocketing spending by the federal government of money taken from citizens and businesses?  Incidentally, one reason health-care costs have risen is insurance for doctors and hospitals--"malpractice insurance"--has gone up and up, because, when court judgements to pay patients who started up lawsuits are made, whether health-care errors were or were not made by doctors or hospitals, those judgements are often in the millions and millions of dollars and can be ridiculous amounts; in fact, insurance premiums can be so high for some doctors that they do not take on the insurance, and it is "tort reform"--in the form of restricting amounts paid out in court judgements--that would make health-care costs lower.]

    Friday, March 6, 2009:
    "...There are those who argued that our recovery plan was unwise and unnecessary.  They opposed the very notion that government has a role in ending the cycle of job loss at the heart of this recession.  There are those who believe that all we can do is repeat the very policies that led us here in the first place, but I also know that this country has never responded to a crisis by sitting on the sidelines and hoping for the best.  I know that throughout our history we have met every great challenge with bold action and big ideas...."  [Barack Obama was at the Columbus police graduation in Ohio when he said this set of words.  Barack Obama did not note that it was the federal government that was instrumental in creating the crisis, as is noted in my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, the link to which is at the end of this document, if read it is read on the Internet (the document is www.hologlobepress.com/logic.htm), and, in particular, it was the federal-government-related entities called Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that really set off the economic problem.  Barack Obama lied again, but it is a liar that he is.]
    "...For those who still doubt the wisdom of our recovery plan, I ask them to talk to the teachers who are still able to teach our children because we passed this plan, I ask them to talk to the nurses who are still able to care for our sick, and the firefighters and first-responders who are still able to keep our communities safe, I ask them to come to Ohio and meet the twenty-five men and women who will soon be protecting the streets of Columbus because we passed this plan...."  [The "plan," which was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and which cost 787-billion-plus dollars, was not and is not a jobs-creating law.  Barack Obama said more lies and nonsense and made a big deal out of twenty-five jobs--in a verbose manner.  The money available for the twenty-five jobs only lasts one year--the local government will have to pick up the cost after one year, which means the jobs may or may not disappear.].

    Friday, March 6, 2009 (when on Air Force One):
    "...Le, le, let's take a look at the budget--the, the answer would be no.  And, dah, ah, let's take a look at, at, ah, what we've done.  We've essentally said that, number one, we're going to reduce non-defense discretionary spending to lowest levels in decades.  That part of the budget, ah, that doesn't include entitlements and doesn't include defense, that we have the most control over, we're actually sitting on a downward trajectory...."   [A reporter asked him if he was a socialist as some people have suggested, and this set of the words made up part of his sloppy and defective answer.]

    [Here is an aside, and it presents text from Barack Obama's book entitled Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, and the material is taken from pages 93 and 94 of the edition with a copyright date of 2004 that was published by Three Rivers Press (New York City, New York): "...I got high for just the opposite effect, something that could push questions of who I was out of my mind, something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blew the edges of my memory.  I had discovered that it didn't make any difference whether you smoked reefer in the white classmate's sparkling new van, or in the dorm room of some brother you'd met down at the gym, on the beach with a couple of Hawaiian kids who had dropped out of school and now spent most of the time looking for an excuse to brawl.  Nobody asked you whether your father was a fat-cat executive who cheated on his wife or some laid-off joe who slapped you around when he bothered to come home.  You might just be bored, or alone.  Everybody was welcome into the club of dissatisfaction.  And if the high didn't solve whatever that was getting you down, it could at least help you laugh at the world's ongoing folly and see through all the hypocrisy and bullshit and cheap moralism...."  He needed to use a drug to escape questions about who he was from his mind!  That is a troubling piece of text.  And there are more troubles with the text; for example, I can hear anger, and I see he seems to think the drugs could give him better insight on the world, which is nonsense.  I ask: What is the condition of his mind?]

    Friday, March 6, 2009 (Barack Obama a telephone call to a reporter at The New York Times, following up in the statements made on Air Force One):
    "...One thing, ah, that I was thinking about as I was, ah, gettin' on the, ah, copter, cause, ah, you know, it was hard for me to, to believe you were entirely serious about that socialist question.  (The reporter makes an ah-hum sound.)   Ah, I, I did think it might be useful to point out that, dah, it wasn't under me that we've started, dah, buying a whole bunch of shares of banks.  It wasn't on my watch, and it wasn't on my watch that we passed, ah, a massive new entitlements, ah, prescription drug plan, without a source of funding.  Ah, and so, I think that, dah it's important just to note, ah, when you start, ah, hearin' folks, ah, throwing these words around that, ah, ah, we've actually been operating, ah, in a way that is entirely consistent with free-market principles, ah, and that, ah, ah, some of the same folks who were, ah, throwing the word socialist around can't say the same.  (The reporter makes a question-type comment.)  Well.  (Barack Obama chuckles.)  I, I, I just think it's clear that by time we had, ah, by the time we got here, ah, ah, there already had been, ah, an enomous infusion of taxpayer money in the financial system, and, ah...the, the thing that I constantly try to emphasize to people is that if coming in the market was doing fine, no one would be happier than me, ah, to stay out of this.  (The reporter says "right.")  Ah...I, I have more than enough to do, ah, without having to worry about the financial system and the fact that, ah, we've had to take these extraordinary measures and intervene, ah, is, ah, not an indication of my idealogical preferences but an indication of the degree to which, ah, ah, lax regulation, ah, and extravagant risk taking, ah, has precipitated the crisis...."   [Examine the text!   For one, should he not be concerned with the economy and financial system?  But Barack Obama says that "...I have more than enough to do...without having to worry about the financial system...." Also examine the text for the way in which Barack Obama speaks--if you were to listen to it, you can hear signs of a wandering mind, and if you read it, you can see the choppiness.  You will see more nonsense and lies, too]

    Wednesday, March 11, 2009 (when he signed the Omnibus Bill into law):
    "....Now, let me be clear, done right, earmarks have, have given legislators the opportunity to direct federal money to worthy projects that benefit people in their districts, and that's why I have opposed their outright elimination...."  [During a presidential debate on television with John McCain, Barack Obama had said, "...Senator McCain likes to talk about earmarks a lot, and that's important.  I want to go line by line through every item in the federal budget and eliminate programs that don't work and make sure that those do work work better and cheaper...."]
    "...I've laid out plans for a budget that begins to restore fiscal discipline so we can break down the 1.3 trillion dollar budget deficit we inherited and pave the way for our long-term prosperity.  For the first time in many years, we've produced a honest budget that makes the hard choices required to cut our deficit in half by the end of my first term in office...."   [Such nonsense he said.]
    "...Now, Congress sent me the final part of last year's budget, a piece of legislation that rolls nine bills required to keep the government running into one, a piece of legislation that addresses the immediate concerns of the American people by making needed investments in line with our urgent national priorities.  That's what nearly ninety-nine percent of this legislation does, the nearly ninety-nine percent that you probably haven't heard much about...."  [The U.S. Congress actually increased the spending by about eight percent in the bill over what had been intended last year, and the U.S. Congress added something like nine-thousand earmarks.]

    Monday, March 16, 2009:
    "...AIG has received substantial sums from the U.S. Treasury, but I've asked Secretary Geithner [the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury] to use that leverage and pursue every single legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayers whole.   I want everybody to be clear Secretary Geithner has been on the case--he's working to resolve this mattter with the new CEO [of AIG] Edward Liddy, who, by the way, ah, everyone needs to understand, came on board after the contracts that led to these bonuses were agreed to last year, ah, but I think Mr. Liddy [who was appointed recently to the position by the federal government] and certainly everybody involved needs to understand, this is not just a matter of dollars and cents, it's about our fundamental values...."
    "...[He coughs and offers up, it seems, a joke.]  Excuse me, I'm choked up with anger here...."
    [It was on this day--the day after there had been a "Tea Party" event (a protest about taxes by citizens) at Foundation Square in Cincinnati, Ohio, that Barack Obama had small business as the theme, but he talked about other matters, especially the idea of AIG people getting bonuses.  Barack Obama presented more lies and nonsense.  First, the contracts involving bonuses (which are "retention bonuses") were or are the way at least some people have gotten paid or are to get paid at AIG--a "retention bonus' is money promised and given to an employee who has been notified that at a certain date in the future the person will be let go, so the money is incentive to get the person to stay at the place till the lay-off date comes or the firing date comes.  AIG received bailout money from the federal govenment through a federal law, but no provision of law states or notes how any money given out by the federal government in relation to the law, such as to AIG or any other entity, has to be spent--in essence, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury was given authority to oversee how all the money was spent, and that means the U.S. Congress and the U.S. President were not given direct control or oversight (it was the U.S. Congress that had written the laws); in addition, it is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 that made any bonuses related to contracts created before February 11, 2009, payable (the bonuses could not be stopped from being issued).  Third, the retention bonuses were set up, for instance, about a year ago, which means the employees attached to them through contract knew they were going to be let go in the future.  Since the employees who got bonuses were or are under contracts, which noted or note how employees would be compenstated, there is nothing that the federal government can do in relation to getting any bonus money back from employees (and not set off lawsuits by employees), and the federal government and Barack Obama should know that information, and so Barack Obama's anger was a sham, and Barack Obama's purpose to make regular Americans believe he was looking out for them was a sham and scam and lie.  (Oh, on this day, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo made big noise-a lot of hot air--by saying he wanted the names of those who received bonuses by 4:00 p.m.)  And what does Barack Obama mean by "our fundamental values"?  Whose fundamental values is he talking about?  (Oh, on March 17, 2009, some federal government officials were making more nonsense noise related to the Barack Obama's scam and sham and lie, saying that the people who got the bonuses should be taxed hard--a tax that might take all the money back (it would be a federal tax that is created by the federal government and directed at one particular company); for example, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer said, "...My colleagues and I are sending a letter to Mr. Liddy informing him that he can go right ahead and tell these employees that are scheduled to get bonuses that they should voluntarily return them, because if they don't, we plan to virtually tax all of it.  He should tell these employees, 'If they don't give the money back, we'll put in place a new law that will allow us to tax these bonuses at a very high rate so that it's returned to its rightful owners, the taxpayers.'  So for those of you who are getting these bouses, be forewarned, you will not be getting to keep them.")  Incidentally, the bonuses amounted to about $165-million dollars, which came out of  the roughly $173-billion dollars given to AIG by the federal government; about $93-billion dollars of the $173-billion dollars was loaned to other banks, even some banks in other countries.]

    Wednesday, March 18, 2009:
    "...People are rightly outraged about these particular bonuses, but just as outrageous is the culture that these bonuses are a symptom of, that have existed far too long, a situation where excess greed, excess compenstation, excess risk-taking have all made us vulnerable and left us holding the bag...."  [What statistics and facts does Barack Obama have to show many people are "outraged" about the bonuses?  Barack Obama presents more nonsense and lies.  And his statement about "excess greed" is defective.  By the way, Barack Obama is trying to teach you that executives and bosses of companies are bad people, and that is nonsense, or, ultimately, Barack Obama is trying--based on his Marxist ideas--to push on you the theme that all business people are bad, even, for instance, a person who runs a small business, such as a meat shop or a hair salon.]
    "...I hope that Wall Street and the marketplace don't think that we can return to business as usual...."  [Here, Barack Obama adds to that of the previous set of quoted material, and Barack Obama's direct attack on "capitalism" in the country--he is attacking the principles of this country, and it shows Barack Obama is a dangernous man and is not working to make the country better, and it shows Barack Obama is working to break the country down.]
   "...The fact that these guys are, ah, looking for bonuses having run down AIG, ah, asks, begs the question of, ah, why were they making that much beforehand when nobody was crticizing them, everybody thought they knew what they were doing...."  ["These guys" are people who were asked to stay on, knowing they were going to be let go soon, and the people were simply working at their jobs and, for instance, doing the job of selling investments--till the firing dates arrived.]
    "...Ultimately, I'm responsible, I'm the president of the United States.  We've got a big mess that we're having to clean up.  Ah, nobody here drafted those contracts, nobody here, ah, was responsible for supervising AIG and allowing themselves to put the economy at risk, ah, by some of the outrageous behavior that they were engaged in.  Ah, we are responsible, though.  The buck stops with me, and my goal is to make sure that we never put ourselves in this kind of position again...."  [What garbage he presents on many points.  For one, see the previous section (date) about the contracts and how the contracts were made exempt from tax.  And, remember, for instance, AIG was dealing with insurance products or investment vehicles related to bad or subprime mortgages loans (the underlying assets of investment vehicles), which had ties to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and, remember, the bad-risk mortgages loans were pushed on the marketplace by rules from the federal government, and, to learn more about the subject, you should see the document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, the link to which is at the bottom of this document.]
    "...Well, I, I have complete confidence, ah, in Tim Geithner and my entire economic team.  Un, understand, as I said before, Tim Geithner didn't draft these contracts with AIG.  There has never been a Secretary of the Treasury, except maybe Alexander Hamilton right after the Revolutionary War, who's had to deal with the multiplicity of issues that Secretary Geithner is having to deal with--all at the same time--and, ah, he is doing so with, ah, intelligence and diligence--nobody's working harder than this guy--ah, he is making, ah, all the right moves, in terms of, ah, playing a bad hand, ah, and what we need to be doing is making sure that we are providing him the support that he needs in order to work through all these problems so that we're able to deal with them more affectively in the future...."  [A reporter noted that his campaign received about $100,000 from AIG and wondered how Barack Obama felt about those contributions today, and the reporter wondered whether or not Secretary of Treasury should resign, as called for by a congressman.  Notice, he never answered the question about the money--purposely.]

    Wednesday, March 18, 2009:
    "....Now passing a budget won't be easy.  We're hearing the same worn arguments we've heard for years.  We'll surely hear more in the coming days.  That's where you come in.  That's why I'm asking you to head outside this Saturday to knock on some doors, talk to some neighbors, and let people know how important this budget is to our future.  And that's why I'm asking you to stay involved in the days ahead by writing letters and making phone calls and summoning that spirit that first gave us this chance for change.  Now is our moment to seize that chance to secure our prosperity for our children and their children that lasts.  With your help and your commitment, I know we can do it...."  [Barack Obama made this statement in a Webcast, and notice how Barack Obama is pushing people to talk about a bill that they have no information about--the bill happens to be more than a $3.8-trillion bill, and Barack Obama has already spent several trillions of dollars of money in the last two months or so, and if this bill is enacted into law, the children and grandchildren of a person living today will have even more heavy debt put on them, and there will be more inflation for the children and grandchildren to deal with.  Barack Obama is serving up a "con job" on followers, who will be hurt by what the bill is if the bill is enacted.  As Mark Levin (of the nationally syndicated radio show called The Mark Levin Show) might say: Barack Obama is rallying his "drones" through the speech.  Oh, by the way, it would be on Friday, March 20, 2009, that the Congressional Budget Office of the federal goverment stated that Barack Obama's proposed budget--with $9.3 trillion of deficit spending between 2010 and 2019--would result in unsustainable deficits, and yet Barack Obama would lie by saying that "...What we will not cut are investments that will lead to real growth and prosperity over the long term."  He would use the word "investments," and what the nonsense thought that would be.]

    [Note: Let me now add this bit of information.  It was during the week of Monday, March 16, 2009, that Barack Obama made more goofs and made more people angry.  For example, on Monday, Barack Obama angered representatives of military veterans, such as the head of the American Legion, by saying that he was promoting the idea of having military veterans get medical insurance related to war injures or potential war injures from the private-medical-insurance industry (Barack Obama's idea is defective, and it shows his heartlessness); during his address to the U.S. Congress on Tuesday, February 24, 2009, Barack Obama had said--"To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines, and to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we will raise their pay and give our veterans the expanded health care and benefits that they have earned....".  Also, for instance, on Tuesday, Barack Obama was attending a St. Patrick's Day party of his in the evening, and Barack Obama made a speech--using his teleprompter--and the teleprompter system had troubles, and Barack Obama ended up reading text designed for the Irish ambassador (of Ireland)--Barack Obama did not quickly realize the problem and ended up reading text of the ambassador's in which he thanked himself for putting on the party.]

    Thursday, March 19, 2009:
    "...For decades, we've avoided doing what we must do as a nation to turn, turn challenge into opportunity.  As a consequence, we import more oil than with did on nine-eleven.  The, the 1908 Model T--think about this--the 1908 Model T earned better gas mileage than the typical SUV in 2008.  Think about that.  A hundred years later, we're getting worse gas mileage not better...."     [Barack Obama has defective thoughts, and that is again evident through his deciding to use such a ludicrous comparision.  An SUV can move at least a quarter ton of mass or payload (think of quarter-ton pickup trucks and half-ton pickup trucks), which a Model T could not.  An SUV can travel for, for example, 400 miles before having to be refueled, and a Model T never could.  An SUV is more rugged than a Model T was.  An SUV has air conditioning, and a Model T never had air conditioning, except openings to the outside (I believe SUVs have "windows").  The federal government forced automakers to put airbags in SUVs, and no Model T ever had airbags.  SUVs have better brake systems than Model T had.  SUVs have good heater systems, and Model Ts had...ugh!  In addition, it was on this day--in the evening--that Barack Obama appeared on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno (on NBC-TV), and he made several disturbing statements, one of which had him trying to dissuade young people from taking up studies in investment banks and the like and which had him trying to promote the idea of having young peolpe take up studies in, for instance, teaching and engineering, and what he was doing is attacking again private enterprise in the country and the banking industry and the like, and that shows even more how defective and dangerous Barack Obama is.]

    Sunday, March 22, 2009 (on 60 Minutes):
    "...Now, ah, do these folks deserve Miranda Rights?   Ah, do they deserve, deserve to be treated like a shoplifter, ah, down the block?   Of course, not!..."  [Barack Obama was talking about enemy combatants captured by U.S. military personnel.  It would be on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, that is became very public knowledge that Barack Obama authorized having U.S. military personnel, FBI agents, and CIA agents read the Miranda Rights to captured combatants, which is a very, very bad idea.  You should see my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this History link, for more about the topic.]

    Tuesday, March 24, 2009 (a news conference--the second):
    "...Finally, the most critical part of our strategy is to ensure that we do not return to an economic cycle of bubble and bust in this country.  We know that an economy built on reckless speculation, inflated home prices, and maxed-out credit cards does not create lasting wealth--it creates the illusion of prosperity, and it's endangered us all.  The budget I submitted to Congress will build our economic recovery on a stronger foundation so that we don't face another crisis like this ten or twenty years from now.  We invest in the renewable sources of energy that will lead to new jobs and businesses and less dependency on foreign oil.  We invest in our schools and our teachers so that our children have the skills they need to compete with any workers in the world.  We invest in reform that will bring down the cost of health care for families, businesses, and our government.  And in this budget we hav, have to make the tough choices necessary to cut our deficit in half by the end of my first term, even under the most pessimistic estimates.  At the end of the day, the best way to bring our deficit down in the long run is not with a budget that continues the very same policies that have led us to a narrow prosperity and massive debt, it's with a budget that leads to broad economic growth by moving from an era of borrow and spend to one where we save and invest.  And that's what clean-energy jobs and busineses will do all across America.  That's what a highly skilled work force can do all across America.  That's what an efficient health-care system that controls costs and entitlements like Medicare and Medicaid will do.  That's why this budget is inseparable from this recovery, because it is what lays the foundation for a secure and lasting prosperity.  The road to that prosperity is still long, and we will hit our share of bumps and setbacks before it ends, but we must remember that we can get there if we travel that road as one nation, as one people.  There was a lot of outrage and finger pointing last week, and much of it is understandable, and I am angry as anybody about those bonuses that went to some of the very same individuals who brought our financial system to its knees--partly because it's yet another symptom of the culture that led us to this point.  But one of the most important lessons to learn from this crisis is that our economy only works if you recognize that we're all in this together, that we all have responsibilities to each other and to our country--bankers and executives on Wall Street need to realize that enriching themselves on the taxpayers dime is inexcusable, that the days of outsized rewards and reckless speculation that puts us all at risk have to be over.  At the same time, the rest of us can't afford to demonize every investor or entrepreneur who seeks to make a profit--that drive is what has always fueled our prosperity, and it is what will ultimately get these banks lending and our economy moving once more.  We'll recover from this recession, but it will take time, it will take patience, it will take an understanding that when we all work together--when each looks beyond our own short-term interests to the wider set of obligations we have toward each other--that's when we succeed, that's when we prosper, and that's what is needed right now.  So let's look towards the future with a renewed sense of common purpose, a renewed determination, and most importantly a renewed confidence that a better day will come...."    [This was a piece of text from his opening statement, which took place before he would take thirteen questions (three of which had follow-up questions).  This part of the statement was loaded with garbage and crap.  First, the budget that he put forth was worth at least 3.6-trillion dollars, and that is an incredible amount of money, and, in essence, the Congressional Budget Office (or the CBO) hinted that it is a bad idea to spend so much money, because, for one, it could lead to a crash of the economy--it will create too much debt.  How does spending trillions of dollars on health care, as he wishes to do, reduce the cost of health care in the country, since he is planning to spend a great, great amount of money?  Again, he talks about investing in things, but the government does not really "invest" in anything, since the government does not make money through working and since it gets money by taxing people and businesses, who normally invest in things.  Barack Obama's saying that he is going to reduce the deficit in half by the end of the next four years is nonsense, since Barack Obama is spending so much money and has already spent an incredible amount of money in the first two months or so of his term in office.  Notice how he thinks of people as "workers."   "When we all work together--when each looks beyond our own short-term interests to the wider set of obligations we have toward each other--that's when we succeed, that's when we prosper..." and "So let's look towards the future with a renewed sense of common purpose, a renewed determination, and most importantly a renewed confidence that a better day will come...."--these two main sets of words should make you think of socialism, collectivism, and worse things, and you think of someone who wants you to be just another one of the group, a pawn, and a number.  Read all the text carefully.  Study it!]
        [The news conference was a boring and useless presentation; for instance, Barack Obama talked in generalities and ran off what are informally called "talking points," such as making general statements about health care, and the remainer of this section presents quotations from the question-and-answer part of the night.]
    "...When it comes to cap and trade, the broader principle is that we've got to move to a new energy era, and that means moving away from, ah, polluting energy sources towards cleaner energy sources.  That is a potential engine for economic growth.  I think cap and trade is the best way from my perspective to achieve some of those gains because what it does is it starts pricing the pollution that's being sent into the atmosphere.  Ah, the way it's structured has to take into account regional differences.  It has to protect consumers from huge spikes, ah, in, ah, electricity prices.  So there, ah, a lot of technical issues that are gonna have to be sorted through.  Our point in the budget is let's get started now--we can't wait.  Ah, and my expectation is that, ah, the energy committees, ah, or other relevant committees in both the House and the Senate are gonna be moving forward, ah, ah, strong energy package.  It'll be authorized.  We'll get it done.  And I will sign it...."  [What a messed up collection of thought that Barack Obama presented.  Barack Obama has said in the past that he would tax coal-related energy producers out of business, and, since the 1970s, it has been the Democratic Party that has heavily pushed to stop companies based in this country from drilling for oil in this country.  Remember: Carbon dioxide (which you exhale when you breathe) is not a pollutant, as it is going to be strongly pushed by Barack Obama that it is.  No good and abundant alternative energy sources or systems exist in the world to replace the use of coal and oil.  And Barack Obama is against--as the Democratic Party has been for decades--the building up of nuclear-based power plants.  Barack Obama's only green energy sytems are windmills and solar cells, and windmills and solar cells are in no way useful enough to power the country.  What does Barack Obama mean by "..take into account regional differences...."?  That thought makes no sense.  Barack Obama has already mentioned how electricity prices are going to rise significantly for everyone through what he would like to do, so he lies in what he said this night about protecting consumers from rising "electricity prices."  And, of course, everything "can't wait..." (Remember: Barack Obama pushed hard to quickly pass through the U.S.Congress the defective American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which was made law on February 17, 2009).]
    "...Of course, I do, Ed, which is why we're doing everything we can to reduce that deficit.  Ah, look, if this were easy, ah, then, ah, we would have already had it done, and the budget would have been voted on and, ah, everybody could go home.  Ah, this is hard.  And the reason it's hard is because we've accumulated a structural deficit that's going to take a long time, and we're not going to be able to do it next year or the year after or three years from now.  What we have to do is bend the curve on these deficit projections, and the best way for us to do that is reduce health-care costs. That's not just my opinion, that's the opinion of almost every single person who has looked at our long-term fiscal situation...." [This was the question: "Do you worry, though, that your daughters not to mention the next president will be inheriting an even bigger fiscal mess if the spending goes out of control?"  Barack Obama's retort was one big lie.  What is "...bend the curve on these deficit projections" section?  Projections are projections.  Is Barack Obama going to fake what the projections are, or is Barack Obama going to lie about the projections or manipulate projections?  Well, let us continue on.  Barack Obama said that "..the best way for us to do that is reduce health-care costs."  Barack Obama is going to spend a lot of money--tax money taken from people and businesses--to make a national health-care system, and then Barack Obama is going to have to cut costs, and that means some patients are going to lose and, it seems to me, see no care and see extra pain and early death.]
    "...So this provision would affect about one percent of the America people, they would still get deductions, it's just that they wouldn't be able to write off thirty-nine percent.  In that sense, what it would do is equalize, ah, when I give a hundred dollars, I'd give the same amount of deduction as when some, ah, bus driver who's making $50,000 a year, $40,000 a year gives that same hundred dollars, right now, he gets twenty-eight percent, ah, ah, he gets to write off twenty-eight percent, I get to write off thirty-nine percent, I don't think that's fair.  So I think this was a good idea, I think it is a realistic way for us, ah, to raise some revenue from people who benefitted enormously, ah, over the last several years.  Ah, it's, it's not gonna cripple them, they'll still be well to do.  And, ultimately, if we're gonna to tackle the serious problems that we've got then, ah, in some cases, those who are more fortunate are gonna have to pay a little bit more...."  [This text was an answer to a question about Barack Obama's wish to make taking tax deductions for charitable contributions harder or reduce the amount that could be deducted from taxes.  In the end and no matter how you look at it, Barack Obama is moving money away from charities and giving it to the federal government--people would have less money to give to charities because they would have less money (and the federal government would have more).  The next paragraph, which follows this one, is an answer to a followup question that wondered if Barack Obama was confident that giving to charities would not be discouraged by his tax plan.]
    "...Yes, ah, I am.  I mean if you look at the evidence, ah, there's very little evidence that this has a significant impact on charitable giving.  I'll you what has a significant impact on charitable giving is a financial crisis and an economy that's contracting, and, so, ah, the most important thing that I can do for charitable giving is to fix the economy, ta get banks lending again, to get businesses opening their doors again, to get people back to work again, ah, then I think charities will do just fine..."  [Barack Obama's thought is nonsense!  If you take away from someone money that can be used for charities, the somone has less to give to charities--that is the truth.  And notice: "...the most important thing that I can do...."  Yes, "I" is there.  Yes, Barack Obama--one man--is going to fix the economy or has the power to fix the economy.  Garbage!]
       [Again Barack Obama avoided answering almost every question clearly and directly, and Barack Obama drifited in his thoughts (which used time for no really good purpose for the television viewer or radio listener), and that was especially true when he worked on the question about the Middle East (especially focusing on Israel); once he talked a bit about the Middle East, he drifted off into talking about unrelated matters, such as the energy challenge, schooling, the budget, the banking system, et cetera.]

    Thursday, March 26, 2009 (during a virtual town meeting on the Internet):
    "...The answer to the question is--Not all of these jobs are gonna come back, and it probably wouldn't be good for our economy for a bunch of these jobs to back because, frankly, there's no way that people could be paid a living wage on some of these jobs, at least, in, or, in order to be competitive in an inner, international setting, so what we got to do is create new jobs that can't be out-sourced, ah, and, and that's why energy is so promising.  I don't think that we've lost all the jobs we're gonna lose in this recession.  We're still gonna be, ah, in a difficult time for much of this year...."  [The question came from woman named Harriet, and she wondered when jobs (outsourced jobs) that went overseas would be back.  What new jobs does he know about that can be created?  Has he just invented something new that will have to be produced?  And why would having jobs come back be bad?  I think jobs are jobs, and more jobs will not hurt.]
    "...We could set up systems so that everybody in each house have their own smart meters that will tell you when to turn off the lights, when the peak hours are, can help you sell back energy, ah, that you've generated in your home through a solar panel or through, ah, ah, other mechanisms.  All this can be done, but it also creates jobs right now.  Our biggest problem, we don't have enough electricians to lay all these lines out there...."  [What a collection of nonsense Barack Obama presents.  Generally speaking, companies have been running electric lines and telephone lines in the country since the late 1800s, and lines have been replaced and changed and updated, and fiber-optic lines have been around for a couple decades, et cetera.  It is very unlikely a person will ever produce enough electricity at the place the person lives through solar panels to have any electricity left over to sell (you could hook up an generator to a bicycle and pedal your days away).  Consider: A house in, for example, Detroit is not in a place where it could produce electricity with a windmill or a paddle wheel set in to the water of a stream or creek.  And smart meters is garbage, allowing the government to have direct control of the power in your house, such as how much you may use.]
    "...I actually want a universal health-care system.  That is our goal!  I think we should be able to provide health care to every American that they can afford and that's provides them high quality...."  [Ugh!]

    Friday, March 27, 2009 (in France):
    "...Ah, it was also interesting to see that, ah, political interaction in Europe is not that different from the United States Senate.  There's a lot of, ah--I don't know what the term is in Austrian--wheeling and dealing, and you know people are out pursuing their interests...."  [Barack Obama seems to think "Austrian" is a language, but it is not, and, in Austria, which is a country in Europe, the main language is German.]

    Monday, March 30, 2009:
    "...GM has made a a good-faith effort to restructure over the past several months, but the plan that they've put forward is, in its current form, not strong enough.  However, after broad consultation with a range of industry experts and financial advisors, I'm absolutely confident that GM can rise again, providing that it undergoes a fundamental restructuring.  As an initital step, GM is announcing today that Rick Wagoner is stepping aside as chairman and CEO.  This is not meant as a condemnation of Mr. Wagoner, who's devoted his life to this company, rather it's a recognition that will take new vision and new direction to create the GM of the future...."  [What experts is Barack Obama talking about?  Name them!  Well, in the end, what we have is Barack Obama, who has done nothing, is now in charge of GM and was instrumental in firing a person in a private company (an unprecedented event and a bad event).  For Barack Obama, failure is the option.]
    "...And during this time, my team will be working closely with GM to produce a better business plan.  Let me be clear--The United States government has no interest in running GM, we have no intention of running GM.  But we are interested in is giving GM an opportunity to finally make those much-needed changes that will let them emerge from this crisis a stronger and more competitive company...."  [What does Barack Obama know about what will make GM viable in the future?   He has run nothing, he has created nothing, and he has only torn things down.]
    "...I'd like to speak directly to all those men and women who work in the auto industry or live in countless communities that depend on it.  Many of you've been going through tough times for longer than you care to remember, and I won't pretend that the tough times are over.  I can't promise you there isn't more difficulty to come.  But what I can promise you is this--I will fight for you. You're the reason I'm here today.  I got my start fighting for working families in the shadows of a shuttered steel plant.  I wake up every single day asking myself--What can I do to give you and working people across this country a fair shot at the American dream?...."  [Oh, yes, Barack Obama can give you a "fair shot" at the American dream (I say in jest).  Such nonsense he stated.  It was and is all a lie, especially the part in which he says that "...I will fight for you...."   That will be the day!  If Barack Obama has his way, workers will be working for a company--the government--and there will be no reason for a union (though the union could run the company), and to whom will employees complain.]
    "...We think we can have a successful U.S. auto industry, but it's got to be one that's realistically designed to weather this storm and to emerge, ah, at the other end, much more, ah, lean, mean, and competitive than it currently is.  Ah, and that's gonna mean a, ah, set of sacrifices for all parties involved--management, labor, shareholders, creditors, suppliers, dealers--everybody's gonna have to come to the table and say--It's important for us to, ah, to take seriously restructuring steps now in order ta preserve a brighter future down the road...." [Barack Obama wants everybody to "sacrifice," since he is doing everything that should not be done to make the auto industry better.]
    "...So it's my hope that the steps I'm announcing today will have, ah, salutary effect, will go a long way forward towards answering many of the questions that people have about the future of GM and Chrysler.  But just in case there's still nagging doubts, let me say it as plainly as I can--If you buy a car from Chrysler or General Motors, you'll be able to get your car serviced and repaired just like always, your warranty will be safe.  In fact, it will be safer than it's ever been because starting today the United States government will stand behind your warranty...."  [The federal government has put Medicare and Medicaid and the Social Security System in a bankruptcy state, and, in essence, at this time, the federal government has 53-trillion dollars in unfunded debt because of such programs (in total); unfunded debt is that which is not covered by expected incoming taxes and such from the private sector (such as citizens), and unfunded debt is debt that is not covered or cannot be covered in the future.  By the way, in jest and as a joke, Mark Levin (of The Mark Levin Show) noted that the telephone number of the White House is 1-202-456-1414, and, maybe, you should use the number if you are having trouble with your warranty, since the federal government is now, it seems, backing warranties.]
    [See: "Monday, June 1, 2009 (General Motors Corporation files for bankruptcy):".]

   Week of Monday, March 30, 2009--particularly late in the week (in Europe for the G20 Summit):
    "...I've come to Europe this week to renew our partnership, one in which America listens and learns from our friends and allies but where our friends and allies bare their share of the burden.  Together we must forge common solutions to our common problems, so let me say this as clearly as I can--America is changing!...."  [Barack Obama through unconstitutional means and devious means is trying to change America, which is based on "the individual" and not "an individual," such as a king or a dictator, which Barack Obama seems to hope to be, and when Barack Obama says that "America is changing," that is not good, since regular Americans--no matter what their race--wish not to be slaves and live in a slave state, which is what Barack Obama seems to want as the way for America, which was never designed to be like governments based on dictators and kings and which, by the way, should not be subject to laws of other countries or international organizations that go against the law structure of the U.S., which is based on the U.S. Constitution.]
    "...After the initial NATO engagement in Afghanistan, ah, we got sidetracked by Iraq...."  [Barack Obama is wrong.  The U.S. did not get sidetracked by Iraq!  The U.S.'s going to Iraq was to protect the people of the U.S., Iraq, and elsewhere in the world.  If you do research about things of this date period, you should discover about sixty-percent of the people in Iraq support some type of government based on democracy--they had what amounted to as hell before.]

    Wednesday, April 1, 2009 (in England, at a press conference and where a G20 meeting would take place):
    "....When we miss an opportunity to lead, to confront a crisis that knows no borders, we have a responsibility to coordinate our actions, and to focus on common ground, not on our occasional differences.  History shows us that when nations fail to cooperate, when they turn away from one another, they turn inward, the price for our people only grows.  That's how the Great Depression deepened.  That's a mistake that we cannot afford to...."  [Barack Obama presented more nonsense thought.  The Great Depression deepened and stayed around a long time in the U.S., because, for one, President Franklin D. Roosevelt kept spending great amounts of money and kept the private sector from growing and doing things (which is the tactic that Barack Obama is using--purposely to hurt people and businesses).  And what ended the Great Depression in the U.S. is Germany and Japan were instrumental in creating World War II, and the U.S. ended up in a big war, and the private sector created machine shops and more to make goods and weapons.  Oh, what do such things as "nations fail to cooperate" and "turn away from one another" mean?]
    "...I, I would say that, ah, if you look at the, the sources of this crisis, ah, the United States certainly, ah, has some accounting to do with respect ta a, ah, regulatory system that was inadequate to the massive changes that had taken place in the global financial system.  I think what is also true is that, ah, here in Great Britain, ah, in Continental Europe, around the world, we were seeing the same mismatch between the regulatory regimes that were in place and, ah, the highly intergrated, ah, global capital markets that have emerged.  So at this point, ah, I'm less interested in identifying blame than fixing the problem, and I think we've taken some very aggressive steps in the United States to do so, not just responding to the immediate crisis but ensuring that, ah, banks are adequately capitalized, ah, dealing with, ah, the enormous drop off in demand and the contraction that's been taking place, but more importantly in, in the long term making sure that we've got, ah, ah, set of, ah, regulations that are up to the task, ah, and that includes, ah, a number that will be discussed, ah, at this summit.  I think there's a lot of convergence between all the parties involved about the need, ah, for example, to focus not on the legal form that a particular financial product takes or the institution that emerges from but rather--what's the risk involved, ah, what's the function, ah, of this product, and how do we regulate that adequately?  Much more affective coordination, ah, between countries so that we can, ah, anticipate some of the risks that are involved and dealing with, ah, the, ah, problem of derivatives markets and making sure that, ah, we've set up, ah, systems that, ah, can reduce some of the risk there.  So, I actually think that there's enormous consensus that has emerged in terms of what we need to do now, and, ah, I'm a big believer in looking forward rather than backwards...." [Barack Obama was asked: Who is responsible for the finacial crisis?  What a mess of nothing Barack Obama did present.  Read it, study.  Notice the nonsense.]
    "...Ah, I had a professor when I was in law school who said--'Some are to blame, but all are responsible.'  Ah, and, I, I think that's the best way for us to approach, ah, the problem that we have right now...."  [Here is more nonsense thought from Barack Obama.  It was and is not up to the U.S. government to regulate the global financial system!  In addition, it was the Democratic Party of the U.S. government that is tied closely to the financial crisis in the U.S., especially those associated to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (federal-government-linked agencies), which triggered the financial crisis.  See THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, the link to which is at the end of this document.  And, remember, the blame goes to many of the big-name Democrats in Washington, D.C., from 1991 to today, and not "all are responsible" for causing the problem, and his saying "all are responsible" tries to take the blame away from the people who were really responsible and should be taken to task or, maybe, to the woodshed.]

     Thursday, April 2, 2009 (a press conference in London, England):
    "..I would like to think with my election and, ah, the early decisions that we've made, ah, that you're starting to see, ah, some restoration of America's standing in the world...."

    Sunday, April 5, 2009 (in Europe):
    "...I state clearly and with conviction America's committment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons.  I am not naive!  This goal will not be reached quickly, perhaps not in my lifetime.  It will take patience and persistence.  But now we too must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change.  We have to insist--Yes, we can.  The United States will take concrete steps towards a world without nuclear weapons.  To put an end to Cold War thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy and urge others to do the same.  But we will begin the work of reducing our arsenal, to reduce our warhare, warheads and stockpiles, we will negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with, with the Russians this year.  President Medvedev [of Russia] and I began this process in London and will seek a new agreement by the end of this year that is legally binding and sufficiently bold.  And this will set the stage for further cuts and we will seek to include all nuclear-weapon states in this endeavor.  We need more resources and authority to strengthen international inspections.  We need real and immediate consequences for countries caught breaking the rules, but we go forward with no illusions--some countries will break the rules.  That's why we need a structure in place that ensures when any nation does, they will face consequences...."  [What a mess of thought came out of Barack Obama's mind.  What type of "structure" does he want and who will do any enforcing?  The United Nations was around in the 1990s and the early 2000s, and there were 17 resolutions of condemnation put out on Iraq by the United Nations about inspections in relation to bad weapons and such in Iraq, and nothing was done by the international community.  Roughly, around the time this speech was made, North Korea launched a missile (in a test) that could carry a nuclear weapon; North Korea is a nation run by a dictator--a dangerous man--who is starving a lot people in North Korea (but he is putting a lot of money into military systems).  Barack Obama's belief he can get the world to reduce nuclear weapons is at the very least naive and childish, since the world has many evil dictators and many communist and Marxist leaders of countries and since the world has many countries that do not wish the United States well or other good countries well.  Overall, what you should hear is Barack Obama's strategy to reduce the strength of the military of the United States, reduce the ability to deter attacks by others on the United States by having a strong force of arms available that could be used to protect the United States, and reduce the amount of military response that the United States can give upon being attacked.  A missile defense for the United States is important to have in this world where enemies have missiles.]

    April 2009 (in Europe):
    "...America's relationship with the Muslim, ah, community, the Muslim world cannot and will not just be based on opposition to terrorism.  We seek broader engagement based on mutual interests and mutual respect.  We will listen carefully, we will bridge misunderstandings, and we will seek common ground.  We will be respectful even when we do not agree.  We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world, including in my own country...."   [Barack Obama is wrong.  It was Europeans of a number of religions that were instrumental in shaping the country and the U.S. Constitution in the early decades, and there were the people from the African continent, too, and then people from other places, such as China (in the 1800s), helped to develop and grow this country, and, yes, Muslims and such contributed to the country.]
    "...In recent years, we've allowed our alliances to drift.  I know that there have been honest disagreements over policies, we also know that there's something more that has crept into our relationship.  In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world.  Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and dismissive, even derisive...."  [Barack Obama puts down the U.S. some more, and it reveals more that he dislikes the U.S., though he is the President of the U.S.]

    Monday, April 13, 2009 (soon after the conclusion of the hijacking of a U.S. vessel by Samolian rebels or terrorists or pirates, an event that had started in the previous week):
    "...We are resolved to halt the rise of privacy in that region...."  [Barack Obama did indeed use the word "privacy" in this quotation.  His using "privacy" instead of "piracy" does not surprise me.  Barack Obama is a man who dislikes individual freedoms.  "Privacy" is probably a word that he has in mind often--in a bad sense for you--and the word slipped out.  Having been an announcer for about three decades, I know how a particular word that is like another word can slip out if that particular word is often held in mind.  I am not laughing, knowing what Barack Obama is and stands for]

    [Note: On Tuesday, April 7, 2009, the Department of Homeland Security of the federal government released a report that law enforcement should be aware of the rise of "right-wing extremist activity," which, it was hinted at can include "conservatives," who stand for limited government, especially limited federal government, and can include those individuals that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority.  The United States of America was, in essence, created by the states and is a product of the states, and states do have certain rights.  On April 14, 2009, Government Rick Perry of Texas said: "...I believe the federal government has become oppressive.  I believe it's become oppressive in its size, its intrusion in the lives of its citizens, and its interference with the affairs of our state.  I'm here today to offer my unwavering support to millions of Texans just like yourself that are tired of Washington, D.C., trying to come down here and tell us how to run Texas...."  Governor Rick Perry was in the State Capitol for Texas, and Rick Perry is one of a number of governors in the country that have refused to take money from the federal government--money that is being pushed on the states by Barack Obama (a state that takes the money referred to would be beholden to the federal goverment about how it should be spent, which could adversely affect the budgets and services of the states in the future.)  The U.S. Constitution, which was created by the states that existed at the time in the 1700s, has within it the idea of "federalism," which is the idea, for one, that powers not granted to the federal government are reserved to the states or, in fact, the people.  By the way, on April 14, 2009, World Net Daily had a list presented on forty-five pages about the places at which "tea parties" were scheduled to take place on April 15, 2009, around the country.]

    Tuesday April 14, 2009 (at Georgetown University):
    "...My administration in Congress boosted demand by passing the largest recovery plan in our nation's history.  It's a plan that's already in the process of saving or creating 3.5-million jobs over the next two years...."  [On this date, Barack Obama made a long speech at Georgetown University, where he had made a stop during the election campaign season, and this thought was only one of many statements that had nonsense.  The recovery plan, which was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (which had been signed into law on February 17, 2009), has really not taken affect, and, in fact, much of it does not take affect until 2010 and 2011. The plan is a mute item at the moment in relation to boosting demand.]
    "...Economists on both the left and the right agree the last thing a government should do during a recession is to cut back on spending.  You see when this recession began many families sat around the kitchen table and tried to figure out where they could cut back and so have many businesses, and this is a completely reseasonable and understandable reaction, but if everybody--if every family in America--cut backs all at once, then no one is spending any money, which means there are more layoffs, which means the economy gets even worse.  That's why the government has to step in and temporarily boost spending in order to stimulate demand.  That's exactly what wer're doing now...."  [What people on the "left" and what people on the "right" was he talking about, and were they in this country or elsewhere, and how many of each side was he talking about?  I have heard reports that many economists, especially on the right, do not agree with the idea that the federal government should spend and spend much money during a recession, and the Congressional Budget Office had reported recently that Barack Obama's plans on spending trillions of dollars was or is a very bad idea.  Remember: When people are given tax refunds, they have more money to spend on products and services, and when they spend the money or even save the money,  they would not cause a big increase in inflation, as happens when the federal government takes up spending trillions of dollars to supposedly stimulate the economy.]
    "...During the course of the decade, the formula changed.  Instead of saving their pennies to buy their dream house, many Americans found that suddenly they could take out loans that by traditional standards their incomes just could not support. Others were tricked into signing these subprime loans by lenders who were trying to make a quick profit.  The reason these loans were so readily available was that Wall Street saw big profits to be made..."  [Barack Obama lied more.  It was the U.S. President Bill Clinton administration that pushed lending institutions to offer more risky loans (as is noted in my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man), and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which are government-tied entities, were a big part of the economic downturn or problem of 2008 and 2009.  People were not "tricked" into signing loans, since it is always up to a person to well understand what the consequences of signing a contract are.  A person should understand when the self does or does not have resources to buy something.  And Wall Street does not make home mortgage loans!  Barack Obama said crap when he made Wall Street the enemy in relation to the creation of mortgage loans!]
    "...It is that house upon the rock, proud, sturdy, unwavering in the face of the greatest storm.  We'll not finish rebuilding America in one year or even many years, but it we use this moment to lay that new foundation, if we come together and being the hard work of rebuilding, if we persist and preserve against the disappointments and setbacks that will surely lie ahead then I have no doubt this house will stand in the dream of founders, will live on in our time...."   [Barack Obama was a liar again, and he showed he is a man of garbage.  There is no "foundation" that needs to be rebuilt, since the country has a worthwhile foundation--The U.S. Constitution and the business principle of capitalism.  To date, all that Barack Obama has done is spend money that the country does not have and has passed along the debt to later generations (hence the term "generational theft").  The founders of this country did not want the country to be, for example, based on Marxism (which is what Barack Obama stands for) or a king or a dictator.]
    [The speech had more nonsense, but I do not list or comment on any of the other nonsense thoughts.]

    Wednesday, April 15, 2009:
    "...For too long, we've seen taxes used as a wedge to scare people into supporting policies that actually increased the burden on working people, instead of helping them live their dreams.  That has to change, and that's the work that we've begun.  We've passed tax cuts that will help our economy grow.  We made a clear promise that families that earn less than $250,000 will not see their taxes increase by a single dime.  We've given income tax relief to the Americans who need it and the workers who have earned it.   So, on this April 15, we're reminded by the enormous responsibility that comes with people's tax dollars, and we're renewing our committment to a simpler tax code that rewards work and the pursuit of the American dream...."   [Barack Obama lied.  The taxes and costs, such as utility costs, are going up.  Remember: Barack Obama said that his policies related to electricity generation were going to increase costs signficantly to consumers.  And useful tax cuts have not been passed.  There is much more nonsense in this quotation, so study it.  What do you think about the "wedge to scare" idea?  I think it is nonsense.  What do you think about the "simpler tax code that rewards work" idea?]

    Wednesday, April  15, 2009 (on CNN Espanol):
    "...Immigration reform has to be part of a broader strategy, ah, to deal with, ah, our border issues
and, as I've said repeatedly, ah, I am a strong sup, proponent of comprehensive immigration reform, ah, I've already met with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, ah, and committed to working with them to try to shape the agenda that can move through Congress...."
    "...There's a reason why there are consistently, ah, so many immigrants to our country from Latin America.  I think people still see, ah, America, as, as, a, a place, ah, full of hope.  But what is also true is there's always been a tradition, ah, of concern that the United States has been heavy-handed when it comes to foreign policy in Latin America...." [What garbage Barack Obama emits from his defective mind.  There has been no tradition of heavy-handedness in Latin America.]

    Thursday, April 16, 2009 (material published in newspapers in, for one, Mexico):
    "...Too often the United States has not sought or maintained relations with its neighbors.  We've allowed ourselves to be distracted by other priorities without realizing that our progress is directly linked to the progress in the whole American continent.  My government is committed to the promise of a new day.  We will renew and maintain more extensive relationships between the United States and the hemisphere for the sake our common prosperity and our common security...."   [This is how the material was presented by Mark Levin of The Mark Levin Show on Thursday April 16, 2009, and you may find slightly different versions, since it is a translation of material presented in one particular version (I chose the punctuation.)   No matter what version you see, you will see a number problems.   For instance, notice the "my government" set of words, and notice how during other times that Barack Obama has talked or does talk, he will often use "I" or "my" or "me," when Barack Obama should have used the "United States" (Barack Obama makes everything about "him").  The United States has maintained and taken up relations with its neighbors, such as Canada and Mexico, the latter of which, in the 1990s, received billions of dollars from the United States to keep it afloat.  By the way, Mark Levin noted on this day that Barack Obama does not talk about black Muslims killing black Christians in Sudan.]
    "...To confront our economic crisis, we don't need to debate about whether to have a rigid, state-run economy or unbridled and unregulated capitalism--we need pragmatic and responsible action that advances our common prosperity.  To combat lawlessness and violence, we don't need a debate about whether to blame right-wing paramilitaries or left-wing insurgents--we need practical cooperation to expand our common security...."  [Mark Levin also presented this quote or nearly it; I was unable to record it, traveling on the roads of Michigan, so this version is as presented by The Huffington Post for the Internet (which involved a different translator it seems).  What is Barack Obama's nonsense about "unbridled and unregulated capitalism"?  And to Barack Obama, everything is "common" this and "common" that, which is Marxist talk.]

    Friday, April 17, 2009:
    "...To move forward, we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements.  I'm very grateful that President Ortega, I'm grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old.   And to often an opportunity to build a fresh partnership of the Americas has been underminded by stale debates.  I didn't come here to debate the past, I came to deal with the future...."  [This comment was made at the Summit of the Americas to a reporter.  Study the comment.  Remember: Daniel Ortega is the dictator in control of Nicaragua.]

    Sunday, April 19, 2009:
    "...Ah, ah, I think it was, it was a nice gesture--that give me a book.  I, I, I'm a reader.  And, ah, you're right, we had this debate throughout the campaign--I mean the whole notion was that, somehow, ah, if we showed courtesy or, ah, opened up dialogue with governments that had previously been hostile to us, ah, that somehow it would be a sign of weakness, and the American people didn't buy it, and there's a good reason the American people didn't buy it, 'cause it doesn't make sense...."  [A reporter for CNN asked Barack Obama, for one, what he thought about receiving the book from Hugo Chavez (the president of Venezuela), who is a dictator, at the Summit of the Americas.  The book is an anti-U.S. book that was written by Eduardo Caleano; the book blames the problems of the Western hemisphere on the U.S., which is false and wrong.  I wonder if the book was purposely given to Barack Obama so that people in the U.S. might buy it and cause the book to displace the book entitled Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto, which was written by Mark R. Levin, from the number-one spot on the best-selling-book lists in the U.S., where it had been for at least three weeks already.  By the way, there was more to the answer, but nothing more over the next minute or so had anything to do with the book that Hugo Chavez gave as a gift.]

    Tuesday, April 21, 2009 (sitting with the King of Jordan at his side):
    "...The, the O.L.C. [Office of Legal Counsel] memos that were released reflected in my view, ah, us losing our moral bearings.  That's why I've discontinued those enhanced interrogation programs.  For those who carried out some of these operations within the four corners of, ah, legal opinions or guidance that had been provided from the White House, ah, I do not think it's appropriate for them to be prosecuted.  Ah, with respect to those who formulated those legal decisions, ah, I would say tha, that is going to be more of a decision for the Attorney General within the parameters of, ah, various laws, and, and I don't want to prejudge that...."  [The country did not lose "our moral bearings."  Barack Obama is a nitwit!  The memos were legal, and the procedures noted within them were legal.  No president has never thought about prosecuting members of a former administration in relation to O.L.C. memos or interrogation procedures on prisoners of war, but now we have Barack Obama, a man who is dangerous to the country and continues to show his hate for the country and each citizen--individual--such as you.  By the way, to see a little more on this subject, you should see the "Nancy Pelosi" entry in the document entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America, which shows how Nancy Pelosi lied about knowing about "waterboarding" events.]
    "...We are willing to uphold our ideals even when they're hard.  And sometimes we make mistakes, because that's the nature of human enterprise, but when we do make mistakes, then we are willing to go back and correct those mistakes, ah, and, and keep our eye on, ah, those, those ideals and values that have been passed on, ah, generation to generation...."  [Study this mess in relation to the previous paragraph for yourself.]

    [Note: Former Vice President Dick Cheney appeared on the Fox News Channel show entitled Hannity (hosted by Sean Hannity) on Monday, April 20, 2009, and here are two comments that Mr. Dick Cheney made (and I was able to receive through The Mark Levin Show on Tuesday, April 21, 2009):
    "...What I find, ah, well, disturbing is the extent to which he's gone to Europe, for example, and seemed to apologize, ah, profusely in Europe, and, dah, and then to Mexico and he had to apologize there and so forth.  And I think you have to be very careful, ah, the world outside there, ah, with our friends and our foes, ah, will be quick to take advantage of a situation if they think that they're dealing with ah, a weak president or one who's not going to stand up and aggressively defend America's interest.  Ah, the United States provides most of the leadership in the world.  We have for a long time.  And, hum, I don't think we have much to apologize for...."
    "...One of the things that I find a little bit disturbing about this recent disclosure is that they put out the legal memos, ah, the memos the CIA got from the Office of Legal Counsel, and they didn't put out the memos that show the success of the effort, and there are reports that, ah, show specifically, hum, what we gained as a result this effort.  They have not be declassified.  I've formally asked that they be declassified now...I didn't announce this, ah, up till now.  I haven't talked about it, but I know specifically of reports that I read, I saw that laid out what we learned through the interrogation process and what the consequences were for the country...."]

    Wednesday, April 22, 2009 (it was "Earth Day," a nonsense event):
    "...You know, ah, some of you may remember during the campaign when gas was really high, I suggested during the campaign that one small step Americans could take would be to keep their tires inflated.  Remember that?  Everybody teased me.  'Oh, look, look!  That's Obama's energy policy.  My opponent sent around tire gauges.  Well, I'll tell you what, turns out, that saves you an awful lot of gas, money in our pocket.  It also made sense for our energy use as a whole.  If eveybody kept their tires inflated that would have a big dent, it would produce as much oil savings as we might be pumpin' in some of these offshore sites by drilling...."  [Barack Obama shows what an idiot he is and what a dangerous man he is through this nonsense statement.]

    Thursday, April 23, 2009 (a statement made after meeting with credit-card executives):
    "...First of all, I think that there has to be strong and reliable protections for the consumers, ah, protections that ban unfair rate increases and forbid abusive fees and penalties.  The days of anytime, any reason rate hikes, ah, and late fee traps have to end.  Number two, all the forms and statements that credit-card companies send out have to be written in plain language and be in plain sight, ah, no more fine print, no more confusing terms and conditions, we want clarity and transparency from here on out...."  [Barack Obama--the dictator--spoke.]

    Monday, April 27, 2009:
    "...One thing is clear, our capacity to deal with a public-health challenge of this sort rests heavily on the work of our scientific and medical community, and this is one more example of why we can't allow our nation to fall behind.  Unfortunately, that's exactly what's happened...."  [Around this date, people were hearing about a swine-flu problem, and, through this statement, Barack Obama put down the greatest medical-research-oriented country in the world, and that shows you what crap Barack Obama is.  By the way, on this day, Barack Obama was at the National Academy of Sciences, and his teleprompter failed, and he ended up introducing people that he had already introduced and goofed up, and here is a piece of his statement: "...In addition to John, sorry, the, ah, I just notice that, ah, I, I jumped the gun here.  Good.  Move it up."  (People in the audience laughed.)  "I'd already, I'd already introduced all you guys...."]

    Wednesday, April 29, 2009 (the 100th day for Barack Obama's administration):
    "...Ya know, when, ah, you see, ya know, those of you who were watch, watching certain, ah, news channels that, ya know, which I'm not very popular, and you see people waving tea bags around."  (People in the audience laughed.)   "Let, let me just remind them that I am happy to have a serious conversation about how we are going to cut our health-care costs down over the long term, how we're going to stabilize Social Security.  Clair and I are working dilgently ta do basically a thorough audit of federal spending, ah, but, but let's not play games and pretend that the reason isn't because of the Recovery Act, because that's just a fraction of the overall problem that we've got.  We are gonna have to tighten our belts, but we're gonna have to do it in an intelligent way, and we got to make sure that the people who are helped are working American families, and we're not suddenly saying that the way to do this is ta eliminate programs that help ordinary people and give more tax cuts for the wealthy.  We tried that formula for eight years.  It did not work, and I don't intend to go back to it...."  [Barack Obama was in Missouri when he passed along this nonsense, especially the "conversation about how we are going to cut our health-care costs" part, since Barack Obama is keeping Republicans out of the discussion process and already has the plan designed.]
    "...We have begun to pick ourselves up and dust ourselves off, and we've begun the work of rebuilding America...."  [Barack Obama lied, and one note on that is the Gross Domestic Product of the country for the first quarter of the year went down 6.1 percent, and that is not good, and his voting for TARP last year, his signing American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (in February 2009), and his spending other trillions of dollars this year are parts of his defective work.]
    [Note: On this day, in the evening, Barack Obama did another news conference--the first part of which was a speech that involved his using a teleprompter and the second part of which was a question-and-answer session that did not involve his using a teleprompter and that was a slow and boring affair that was filled with a lot statements that offered nothing useful.  One of the statements that Barack Obama had referred to Winston Churchill (of England), who was an important figure during World War II, and, here, I note that, a number of weeks ago, Barack Obama sent a bust of Winston Churchill, which had been given as a gift to the U.S. by England, back to England, not wanting it around.]

    Thurday, April 30, 2009:
    "...A group of investment groups and hedge funds decided to hold out for the prospect of an unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout.  They were hoping that everybody else would make sacrifies and they would have to make none.  Some demanded twice the return that other lenders were getting.  I don't stand with them!  I don't stand with those who held out when everybody else is sacrificing...."  [This statement relates to the Chrysler bailout and bankruptcy event that was going on.  Notice that Barack Obama used "sacrifices" and "unjustified."   His thoughts are nonsense.  The investment groups and hedge funds, which are honorable entities and legal entities, hold money of all types of people in the private sector, such as people who can be secretaries or auto workers, and Barack Obama forced--forced--these entities to take low returns, somewhere around 20 cents on the dollar, and you should see my documents entitled Madness in a President and Other Matters in a Defective Mind and Frank Beckmann of WJR-AM Interviews Tom Lauria, an Attorney in Chrysler Mess, which give evidence that Barack Obama used coercion to get the investment groups or hedge funds (which can be considered "bond holders" in this case) to accept less money in the bankruptcy mess related to Chrysler than they should have (and the links to those documents exist at the end of this document).  Barack Obama is a thug!]
    Note: You should see the entry for "June 16, 2010," which exists later in this document.

    Thursday, May 7, 2009:
    "...But these savings large and small add up.  The one-hundred-twenty-one budget cuts we are announcing today will save taxpayers nearly seventeen-billion dollars next year alone.  And even by Washington standards that should be considered real money...."  [I first learned through Mark R. Levin on his radio show on Thursday, May 7, 2009, that, actually, the 17-billion is not a cut but a shift, since the money from the certain uses can be shifted to other uses (Mark Levin read an article).  And, given that Barack Obama has spent or set up spending of somewhere near ten-trillion dollars already, the seventeen-billion dollars is a tiny, tiny drop in the bucket--if it were really a budget cut. Ah, what a fun lie that Barack Obama gave.  For more information about the seventeen-billion dollars, you should see the article entitled "The $17 Billion in 'Savings'" that appeared on National Review Online on May 7, 2009.  And you should see "Thought Number Four" of my document entitled THOUGHTS AND STATEMENTS ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the individual woman and the individual man, since it has informaton about "zero-line budgeting" and "baseline budgeting" of government.]
    "...We must build a government of the twenty-first century, a government that is more efficient and more effective, a government that does what we need to do it...."  [Yes, Barack Obama said this.  What did Barack Obama mean?  Barack Obama goofed again!]

    Friday, May 8, 2009:
    "...Now, such hardworking Americans are why I ran for president.  They're the reason we've been working swiftly and aggressively across all fronts to turn this economy around, to jump start spending and hiring and create jobs where we can with steps like the Recovery Act.  Because of this plan, cops are still on the beat, and teachers are still in the classroom.  Shovels are breaking ground, and cranes dot the sky.  A new life has been breathed into private companies like Sharon Arnold's.  Already ninety-five percent of working Americans are seeing a tax cut that we promised would show up in their paychecks...."  [Note: "Sharon Arnold's" may be spelled incorrectly, since I choose the spelling while listening to an audio clip of the statement.  Now I say that all that Barack Obama said was flapdoodle, since, for one, the unemployed total for the country increased by over 500,000 in April 2009, and, also, for the first quarter of 2009, the economic-activity number for the country dropped by 6.1. percent.  Barack "Flapdoodle" Obama just ran off the mouth, or B.O. just ran off the mouth!]

    Wednesday, May 13, 2009:
    "...The publication of these photos would not add any additional benefit to our understanding of what...carried out in the past by a small number of individuals.  In fact, the most direct consequence of releasing them I believe would be to further inflame anti-American opinion and to put our troops in greater danger...."
    "...Let me be clear I am concerned about how the release of these photos, ah, would impact on the safety of our troops.  Ah, I have made it clear to all who are within the chain of command, however, ah, of the United States armed forces that the abuse of detainees in our custody is prohibited and will not be tolerated...."

    Wednesday, May 13, 2009 (in a speech to graduating students at Arizona State University in Tampa, Florida):
    "...It may be tempting to fall back on the formulas for success that have been peddled so frequently in recent years.  You're taught to chase after all the usual brass rings. You chase after big money.  You figure out how big your corner office is.  You worry about whether you have a fancy enough title or a fancy enough car.  That's the message that's sent each and every day or has been in our culture for far too long--that through material possessions, through a ruthless competition pursued only on our own behalf--that's how you will measure success...."  [Doing for yourself--This concept is a selfish idea in Barack Obama's mind.  Notice how Barack Obama put down material possesions, which should make you think about such material possessions as--a house, a car, a boat....  Socialists and communists do not want individuals to own property, such as land and a house!  Wake up!]
    "...I want to highlight two main problems with that old tired me-first approach to life.  First of all, it distracts you from what's truly important--it may lead you to compromise your values and your principles and your committments.  It was in pursuit of gaudy short-term profits and the bonuses that came with them that so many folks lost their way on Wall Street.  The trappings of success may be a by-product of this larger mission, but it can't be the central thing.  Just ask Bernie Madoff...."  [On March 12, 2009, Bernie Madoff pleaded guility to eleven criminal charges associated with a ponzi scheme related toWall Street that involved him, and it must be remembered most operators of businesss are not crooks, but Barack Obama tried to teach these students that business operators are crooks or bad.]
    "...A relentless focus on the outward markers of success can lead to complacency.  In recent years, in many ways, we've become enamored with our own past success, lulled in the complacency by the glitter of our own achievements.  We've become accustomed to the title 'military super power,' forgetting the qualities that got us there, not just the power of our weapons, but the discipline and valor and the code of conduct of our men and women in uniform.  We've become accustomed to our economic dominance in the world, forgetting it, it wasn't reckless deals and get-rich-quick schemes that got us where we are but hard work and smart ideas, quality products and wise investments...."  [Barack Obama simply ran off the mouth here.]
    "...Did you study business?  Why not help a struggling non-for-profit find better and more effective ways to serve folks in need.  Did you study nursing?  Under-staffed clinics and hospitals across this country are desperate for your help.  Did you study education?  Teach in a high-needs school, give a chance to kids who can't, who can't get everything they need maybe in their neighborhood, maybe not even their home, but we can't afford to give up on them--prepare them to compete for any job anywhere in the world.  Did you study engineering?  Help us lead a 'green revolution,' developing new sources of green energy that will power our economy and preserve our planet.  Find somebody to be success for.  Raise their hopes, rise to their needs!...."
    [These four pieces of text should make you cringe.  Barack Obama told the students not to strive, and Barack Obama told the students to be sheep and, in essence, work for the state and give up on being involve in the private-sector industry of the country.  Barack Obama put down all business people by comparing them to a prominent bad man, Bernie Madoff.  Barack Obama studied the teachings of Saul Alinsky, who was a communist, and Saul Alinsky's book entitled Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, and in the book, Saul Alinsky says "...once you organize people around something a commonly agreed upon as pollution, then an organized people is on the move.  From there it is a short and natural step to political pollution, to Pentagon pollution...."  You should see Barack Obama wanted the students and all persons to join him in his revolution--a part of which is the "green revolution."  Oh, yes, Barack Obama put down the United States of America once again.  Study the four pieces carefully, and understand a man who is really not bent on making the business community, such as the auto industry, better in the country.]
    "...The long-term deficit and debt that we have accumulated is unsustainable.  We can't keep on just borrowing from China or borrowing from other countries because part of it is, we have to pay, we will pay interest on that debt, and that means we're mortgaging our children's future with more and more debt, but what's also true is at some point they're just going to get tired of buying our debt, and when that happens, we will really have to raise interest rates to be able to borrow and that will raise interest rates for everybody, on our auto loan, on your mortgage, on, so it'll, it will have a dampening effect on the economy...."  [Barack Obama really put on the crap with this statement.  Barack Obama has been the driving force in the over-spending--Barack Obama is the problem.  And it seems to me, over the next three years or so, Barack Obama will spend even more or try to spend even more, though he has already set up at least ten-trillion dollars of new debt so far.]

    Sunday, May 17, 2009 (at the University of Notre Dame):
    "...And part the problem, of course, lies in the imperfections of man--our selfishness, our pride, our stubbornness, our acquisitiveness, our insecurities, our egos, all the cruelties large and small that those of us in the Christian tradition understand to be rooted in original sin.  We too often seek advantage over others, we cling ta outworn prejudice and fear those who are unfamiliar.  Too many of us view life only through the lens of immediate self-interest and crass materialism, in which the world is necessarily a zero-sum game   The strong too often dominate the weak, and too many of those with wealth and with power find all manner of justification for their own priviledge in the face of poverty and injustice.  And so for all our technological and scientific advances, we see here in this country and around the globe violence and want and strife that would seem sadly familiar to those in ancient times...."  [I could have left out the final sentence of this piece of text, but I left it in, though with it gone you would better see a thought that I now present.  It does seem to me that Barack Obama is talking about himself in this piece of text, and it is as if subconsciously he is exposing himself.  For example, Barack Obama listens to no one, acting like a dictator, and Barack Obama has been cruel, talking down the stock market and putting people out of work and attack 401(k) investments, and Barack Obama has used intimidation to force bond holders related to Chrysler Corporation to give up what should be due them (see Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind or Frank Beckmann of WJR-AM Interviews Tom Lauria, an Attorney in Chrysler Mess), and Barack Obama has done more that fits the statement.  It were as if Barack Obama's mind was showing its current internal conflict.  But that is not schizophrenia.]
    "...How do we engage in vigorous debate?   How does each of us remain firm in our principles and fight for what we consider right without demonizing those with just as strongly held convictions on the other side?  And, of course, nowhere do these questions come up more powerfully than on issue of abortion.  Maybe, we won't agree on abortion, but we can still agree this heart-wrenching decision for any woman is not made casual.  It has both moral and spiritual dimensions.  So let us work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions.  Let's reduce unintended pregnancies...."  [Barack Obama presented filler material here.]
    "...I found myself drawn not just to the work with the church, I was drawn to be in the church.  And at time, Cardinal Joseph Bernardin, who was the archbishop of Chicago.  For those of you too young to have known him or known of him, he was a kind and good and wise man, a staintly man.  I can still remember him speaking at one of the first organizing meetings that I attended on the south side.  He was congenial and gentle in his persuasion, always trying to bring people together, always trying to find common ground...."  [Barack Obama presented more filler material.  However, notice the material led into the "common ground" idea, and you must remember you should not find "common ground" with the enemy, when the enemy is wrong or is presenting something that is bad--you give up no ground to the enemy, you blast the enemy "out of the water."  Do not get in the habit of giving up on what is right!]
    "...I stand here today as president and as an African-American on the 55th anniversary of the day that the Supreme Court handed down the decision in Brown vs. Board of Education, and Brown, of course, was the first major step in dismantling the Separate But Equal doctrine.  But it would take a number of years in a nationwide movement to fully realize the dream of civil rights for all of God's children...."  [How do the unborn or just-born-but-not-wanted fit in with Barack Obama's statement, since Barack Obama supports infanticide?]
    "...This generation, your generation is the one that must find a path back to prosperity and decide how we respond to a global economy that left millions behind even before the most recent crisis hit,. an economy where greed and short-term thinking were too often rewarded at the expense of fairness and diligence and a honest day's work...." [What "millions" is Barack Obama talking about?  Is Barack Obama talking about people in other counties?  Many countries around the world have gone nowhere in improving the lives of citizens, because the countries are headed by kings or dictators and tyrants who wish to keep the citizens poor and weak (especially in relation to resources, such as money).  My knowledge makes me note to you that most businesses in the United States of America have always thought about the long-term impact of decisions so that the companies will not go out of business; for example, managers think about inventory of raw materials or finished materials, the life span of equipment, the employees that might be hired in growing the company, et cetera.  Barack Obama's thought about "fairness" is useless thought.]
  "...Your generation must decide how to save God's creation from a changing climate and the threats to destroy it...."  [I will say, in this case, "man" is not a "god" or "God" and does not have the power to change the climate of the world--the world is very, very, very, very big, large "man" could not gather up enough energy or mechanical systems or whatever to change the climate of the planet or control the climate of the planet.  The planet does what it does.]
    "...remember that in the end in some way we are all fishermen, if nothing else that knowledge should give us faith, and through our collective labor, and God's providence, and our willingness to shoulder each other's burdens, America will continue on its precious journey towards that more perfect union...." [Barack Obama closed with this statement, and notice the word "collective" is used ("collective" is a word regularly used by communists and the like, and "collective" is used to put down the idea of "individualism").  Why should I shoulder other's burdens, before the other's work to cover their own burdens?  Why should you cover my burdens?  In life, you do have to do something, and if you do nothing, you get nothing!  (By  the way, Barack Obama is a man who really has done nothing.)  And Barack Obama showed he is working to get to some type of utopia.  And what is "utopia" for a mind--Barack Obama's mind--that is defective?  (See Madness in a President or Other Matters of a Defective Mind.)]

    Monday, May 18, 2009 (announcing new CAFE standards, which deal with mileage for vehicles in relation to a gallon of fuel used):
    "...Thank you all for coming to the White House today and for coming together around what I consider to be a historic agreement to help America break its dependence on oil, reduced harmful pollution, and begin the transition to a clean-energy economy.  As this is an extraodinary gathering, here, we have today, standing behind me, along with, ah, Ron Gettelfinger and, ah, leadership of the UAW, we have ten of the world's largest auto manufacturers, we have environmental advicats, ah, as well as elected officials from all across the country...."  [Barack Obama said that the country is going to go from an oil-based economy to a ???????-based economy.  What is going to replace oil?]
    "It's no secret we've been at odds, ah, for years, even decades, in fact, some of the groups here have been embroiled in lawsuits against one another.  So that gives you a sense of how impressive and significant it is that these leaders from across the country are willing to set aside the past for the sake of the future.  For what everyone here believes, even as views differ on many important issues is that the status quo is no longer acceptable.  While the United States makes up less than five percent of the world's population, we create roughly as quarter of the world's demand for oil and this appetite comes at a tremendous price...."  [Barack Obama dislikes that "status quo" of everything that is the United States of America, and you and your beliefs in freedom and individuality are part of the status quo that Barack Obama dislikes.  Oh, the reason the United States of America uses oil and other energy more than other countries do is the people of the United States of America do things, build things, invent things, et cetera, and many other countries around the world do nothing.]
    "...California has also agreed to support this standard, and I wanna applaud California, Governor Swartzenegger, and the entire California delegation for their extraordinary leadership.  Ah, they have led the way on this as they have in so many other efforts to protect the environment...."  [California is a dead state--nearly in bankruptcy.  By the way, on Tuesday, May 19, 2009, voters in California sank through the election process six tax proposals!  People in California are revolting against their bad elected officials.]
    "...It costs money to develop these vehicles, but even as the price to build these cars and trucks goes up, the cost of driving these vehicles will go down, as drivers save money at the pump, and this is a point I want to emphasis--if you buy a car, your investment in a more fuel-efficent vehicle as a result of this standard will pay off in just three years.   Three years time, you will have paid off the additional investment required.  Over the life of a vehicle, the typical driver would save about twenty-eight-hundred dollars by getting better gas mileage.  Everyone wins!...."  [The amounts are lies.  People are not going to save money.  Taxes will go up in states to pay for roads and whatever.  And, by the way, I know smaller vehicles do not last as long as bigger vehicles do (parts, such as engine parts, break down faster in smaller vehicles than bigger vehicles), and that means you will have more repairs to make and pay for or have to change vehicles more often.]
    "...We have over the course of decades slowly built an economy that runs on oil.  It has given us much of what we have--for good but also for ill.  It has transformed the way we live and work, but it's also wrecked havoc on our climate.  It's helped create gains in prosperity unpresidented in history, but it also places our future in jeopardy.  Ending this dependence will take time.  It will take an incredible effort, it will take a, a historic investment in innovation, but more than anything, it will take a willingness to look past our differences, to act in good faith, to refuse to continue the failures of the past, and to take on this challenge together...."   [Barack Obama presented more nonsense, dug out of his destorted view of life.]
    [Oh, by the way, I have to talk about ethanol used in gasoline, because gasoline with ethanol is less effective than gasoline alone, which means if more ethanol is added to fuels, people will get less miles per gallon and that will affect the mileage standards--vehicles will not have a harder time meeting mileage standards.  Did you know it takes about 140 gallons of water to make a gallon of ethanol?  Look it up!  I have heard about companies that produce ethanol that are not doing well or, in fact, are going bankrupt.]

    Wednesday, May 20, 2009:
    "...We're pleased we've seen some progress, ah, that, ah there is some return to normalcy in certain aspects of the financial markets..."  [Barack Obama is running off the mouth again.  To what normalcy does Barack Obama refer?  After having fallen greatly in late 2008 and early 2009, the stock market is now, in essence, stalled, and Barack Obama now has some control of some banks of the country, which is not normal, and, on this day, in essence Barack Obama's administration took more control of GMAC, a finance company, by giving it more federal-government money, and that is not normal business for the country, and it is bad business for the country.  And at this moment, I can say--In addition, early next month, many more people around the country will be put out of work when about 400 auto dealers related to Chrysler Corporation will lose ties to Chrysler Corporation because Barack Obama's administration is breaking the ties and established contracts, and then businesses that do work for the dealerships will be hurt or have to close down, and that will be especially bad for small towns or communities.]

    Thursday, May 21, 2009:
    "...Unfortunately, faced with an uncertain threat, our government made a series of hasty decisions.  I believe that many of the decisions were motivated by a sincere desire to protect the American people.  But I also believe that all too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight.  But all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions, instead of strategically applying our power and our principles.  Too often we set those principles aside as luxuries we could no longer afford...."  [The theme of this text is fighting terrorism as done by the U.S. President George W. Bush administration, and Barack Obama ran off the mouth again, but I will say that, during U.S. President George W. Bush's time as the U.S. President, the country did not set aside principles or did not set aside the "rule of law" of the country.]
    "...For reasons that I will explain, the decisions that were made over the last eight years established an ad-hoc legal approach for fighting terrorism that was neither effective nor sustainable, a framework that failed to rely on our legal traditions and time-tested institutions...."  [Barack Obama lied again, and, for one, the approach was not a failure, since a plot to attack Los Angeles, California, was averted.]

    Wednesday, May 27, 2009:
    "...This woman is brilliant!  She is qualified!  I want her confirmed!  I want her walking up those marble steps, and starting to provide some justice!..."  [This statement was made in relation to the U.S. Supreme Court and his nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor (a judge of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals) to become a new member of the U.S. Supreme Court.  Notice how he thinks the U.S. Supreme Court has not been providing justice, though it has for every individual on a non-race basis.  To learn more about Sonia Sotomayor, see the section called "Sonia Sotomayor" in the document entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America, a link to which exists at the end of this document.]

    Wednesday, May 27, 2009:
    "...I want you to know Los Angeles, you ain't seen nothing yet...."  [He attended a fund-raiser with Hollywood-type people when he made this statement.]
    "...we're making some progress."  (There was laughter from the audience.)  "We're donin'."  (He chuckled.)  "We're doin' Okay.  But as pleased as I am with how far we've come, and because we've been movin' so quickly, I think people maybe don't entirely realize how extraordinarily productive we've been these forc, ah, these first four months.  Ah, I would put these four months up against, ah, the four months of, of any prior administration since F.D.R...." [This was said to the Hollywood people, who laughed, though Barack Obama has done crap to the country, such as kill General Motor Corporation and Chrysler Corporation and spend many trillions of dollars on mostly useless crap.]
    "...When you look at the economy, right now, I think it's safe to say that we have stepped back from the brink, that there is some calm that didn't exist before...."   [Such nonsense Barack Obama said to the Hollywood people, and, now, go on to Monday, June 1, 2009, the day on which General Motors Corpotation went into bankruptcy, and Barack Obama made a bunch of nonsense statements, one of which was a statement that more hurt was coming--more jobs were to be lost.]

    Monday, June 1, 2009 (General Motors Corporation filed for bankruptcy and Barack Obama spoke):
    "...But I want to be honest with ya.  Building a leaner G.M. will come at a cost.  It will take a painful toll of many Americans who have relied General Motors throughout the generations.  So I wanna say a word directly to all the man and women watching today, wondering what all this will mean as far as their own lives are concerned.  I know you've already seen more than your fair share of hard times.  We saw four-hundred-thousand jobs lost in the auto industry in the year before this restructuring even began.  I will not pretend the hard times are over.  Difficult times days lie ahead.  More jobs will be lost.  More plants will close.  More dealerships will shut their doors, and so will many parts suppliers.  But I want you to know that what you're doing is making a sacrifice for the next generation, a sacrifice you may not have chose to make but a sacrifice you were nevertheless called to make so that your children and all, and all of our children can grow up in America that still makes things and still builds cars, that still strives for a better future...."  [Why should anyone believe Barack Obama?  Why should anyone believe that the children of the future really will have a better time?  Barack Obama talked crap.  And, yes, because Barack Obama attacked the auto industry and, for one, is giving General Motors to the UAW and taking away the investment of bond holders in General Motors, people will have to "sacrifice."  Barack Obama is purposely hurting people, because, it seems, Barack Obama likes to hurt people, and you should see the document entitled Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind, a link to which exists at the end of this document, which shows that Barack Obama likes to hurt people.]
    "...As our auto workers in auto communities past through these difficult times we as a nation but do our part.  That's why in March, I appointed Ed McGovern [Ed Montgomery*], Director of Recovery for Auto Communities and Workers.  That's why two weeks ago, Ed announced a green-jobs training program for auto workers in hard-hit communities.  That's why last week, Ed and Karen Mills, my Small Business Administration chief, traveled to Indiana to announce a new plan to provide loans to auto, RV, and boat dealers to help finance floor plans.  That's why, we are accelerating the purchase of a federal fleet of cars to jump start demand and give the industry a boost at a time when it needs one.  And that's why, I'm calling on Congress to pass fleet-modernization legislation that can provide a credit to consumers who turn in old cars and purchase cleaner more-fuel-efficient cars.  These are important steps on a long road to overcoming a problem that didn't happen over night and will not be solved over night.  I recognize that today's news carries a particular importance, because it's not just any company we're talking about.  It's G.M.  It's a company that's not only been a source of income but a source of pride for generations of auto workers and generations of Americans.  While the G.M. of the future will be different from the G.M. of the past, I am absolutely confident that, if well managed, a new G.M. will emerge that can provide a new generation of Americans with a chance to live out their dreams, that can out-compete auto makers around the world and that can once again be an integral part of America's economic future...."  [Notice the "our auto workers" set of words and the "do our part" set of words.  These sets of words are thoughts related to "collectivism" of the socialism idea, and notice how it puts people in categories.  Barack Obama talked about groups of people that he sees that he can control and are beneath him.  I shall let you analyze the remainder of the mess for yourself.]
    [* = The audio clip that I heard seemed to show that Barack Obama said "McGovern," but the name should be Ed Montgomery.]
    "...These companies were facing a crisis decades in the making and having relied on loans from the previous administration were asking for more.  From the beginning, I made it clear that I would not put any more tax dollars on the line, if it meant perpetuating the bad business decisions that had led these companies to seek help in the first place.  I refused to let these companies become permanent wards of the state, kept afloat on an endless supply of taxpayer money...."   [One reason the auto industry was hurt was the federal government--mostly Democrats in the U.S. Congress--blocked companies from drilling for oil in the country, which would have kept oil prices lower.  Notice Barack Obama put down the management of the company, which did well for decades--getting in trouble because of the federal-government rules and unsustainable UAW health contacts and UAW other benefits.]
    "...The management team, including its new CEO Fritz Henderson, its interim Chairman Kent Kresa, and all of their colleagues, has, have worked, has worked tirelessly to produce a plan that meets the strict standards I laid out in the beginning to streamline G.M.'s brands, clean up G.M.'s balance sheet, to make it possible for G.M. to compete and succeed...."   [So, Barack Obama does not want to run G.M., yet, for example, Barack Obama told his chosen management team to streamline the number of brands.  What does Barack Obama know about brands and marketing?  And Barack Obama picked the management team.]
    "...What we're not doing, what I have no interest in doing is running G.M.  G.M. will be run by a private board of directors and management team with a track record in American manufacturing that reflects a commitment to innovation and quality.  They and not the government will call the shots and make the decisions about how to turn this company around.  The federal government will refrain from exercising its rights as a shareholder in all but the most fundamental corporate decisions.  When a difficult decision has to be made on matters like where to open a new plant or what type of new car to make, the new G.M.--not the United States government--will make that decision...."  [This statement is crap of the first degree.  Barack Obama set up the management!  One of the most important decisions that could be made is where to put a factory or plant, so Barack Obama lied.]
    "...But for years, G.M. has been buried under an unsustainable mountain of debt, and piling an irresponsibly large debt on top of the new G.M. would mean simply repeating the mistakes of the past...."  [Barack Obama had nerve to say this, given that he has set up federal spending plans that will increase the debt of the country by many trillion of dollars over the next decade, which is bad for the country).
    [If you study the quotations will will notice many things.  I hope you notice that Barack Obama is pushing "protectionism," which, in this case, is the idea of not allowing vehicles made by General Motors-like entities overseas to send their vehicles to the United States of America, and that will hurt automobile workers and other persons in other countries and that will depress the economies of other countries.  You should notice, of course, the "socialism" aspect is the idea that the federal government now owns what was a completely private-industry entity, and, yes, that is socialism crap.  And you should notice Barack Obama gave the UAW power--ownership--in a formerly private-industry entity, and the amount of ownership was not deserved, and, by the way, if you do research, you will find bond holders involved with General Motors before this date got shafted, as had bond holders who were involved in Chrysler Corporation.]
    [See: "Monday, March 30, 2009:".]

    Monday, June 1, 2009 (in a Frence interview):
    "...if you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world...."

    Thursday, June 4, 2009 (at Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt):
    "...I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.  But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America.  Just as, just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire..."  [I wonder: Does Barack Obama think of the United States of America as an "empire"?]
    "...Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will enevitably fail...."  [No "world order" has been set up by countries, and, certainly, no other nations put the United States of America is some slot of greatness in the world--the greatness of the United States of America came about through the many generations of free people in the United States of America and what the people did.]
    "...We meet in a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world, tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate.  The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of coexistence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars.  More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims and a Cold War in which Muslim majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations.  More over, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam...."  [Who was involved in "colonialism" in Barack Obama's mind?  Does Barack Obama think the United States of America is an "empire" that is running colonies, as, for instance, Spain and Engalnd once did?]
    "...As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dust.  As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith...."   [When Barack Obama was a boy, he spent some years in Muslim schools, and I believe Barack Obama is a Muslim--and since Barack Obama is a "radical," under the rules of Saul Alinsky, Barack Obama could be a "radical Islam"-type.]
    "...Now, let me also address the issue of Iraq.  Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences my country and around the world.  Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible...."  [Notice the "my" in this piece.  Regularly, Barack Obama uses "I" and "my," instead of, for example, the United States of America or America, since Barack Obama seems to push himself first.  I bet Barack Obama is a narcissist--I am convinced Barack Obama is a megalomaniac.]
    "....Nine-eleven was an enormous trauma to our country.  The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable, but in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our traditions and our ideals.  We are taking concrete actions to change course.  I have unequivocally prohibited the use torture by the United States.  I have ordered the prison at Quantanamo Bay closed by early next year...."  [Notice the "I," and notice how he is almost detached from the United States of America as if he controlled a number of countries, and he was telling the United States of America to stop.]
    "...Six-million Jews were killed, more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today.  Denying that fact is baseless, it is ignorant, and it is hateful.  Threatening Israel with destruction or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews is deeply wrong and only serves to evoke in the minds of the Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of the region deserve.  On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people--Muslims and Christians--have suffered in the pursuit of a homeland.  For more than sixty years, they've endured the pain of dislocation...."  [Barack Obama is pushing for a "two-state solution" to the Middle East problem, which is a bad idea.]
    "...As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam.  It was Islam at places like al-Azhar that carried light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment.  It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra, our magnetic compass, and tools of navigation, our mastery of pens and printing, our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed.  Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires, timeless poetry and cherished music, elegant calligraphy, and places of peaceful contemplation.  And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality...."   [Much is wrong with this material.  For example, in the early hundreds, the Chinese were working with block printing, and it was in Europe in the 1400s that Johann Gutenberg was working with movable type.  In a lot of the Middle East, are not women treated as second-class citizens and do not some Muslim countries disallow music to be played?]

    Thursday, June 4, 2009 (an answer in interview with Tom Brokaw of NBC):
    "...:Well, look, there's, there's no equivalancy here.  But I do think that, ah, given the extraordinary moral traditions of Judasm, the potential, ah, power of empathy that arises out of having gone through such historic hardships, ah, that, that will ultimately give the people of Israel the strength and purpose, ah, to seek a just-and-lasting peace, and that I believe will involve creating two states side by side with peace and security...."  [He was talking about Israel and the Palestinians.  Tom Brokaw's question was roughly: What should the Israelis learn from your visit to Bukenwald (Germany) and what should they be thinking about with regards to their treatment of Palestinians?  Israel has given up land in the recent past, and Palestinian leaders created nothing on it, such as a thriving school system, and have launched rocket attacks on Israel from the land!  By the way, Tom Brokaw is one of the media "darlings" in my document entitled Never Forget These Media "Darlings" (?) -- A Guide for the Individual in the United States of America, which can be reached through this link: Media.]

    Saturday, June 6, 2009 (a radio address):
    "...we can't continue this way.  If we do nothing, everyone's health care will be put in jeopardy.  Within a decade, we'll spend one dollar out of every five we earn on health care, and we'll keep getting less for our money, and that's why fixing what's wrong with our health-care system is no longer a luxury we hope to achieve, it's a necessity we cannot postpone any longer...."  [Barack Obama made predictions and presented no facts about what the problems are, and through research, you will find the federal government is a big problem with the health-care system at this time, such as by running Medicare improperly, and what Barack Obama was trying to do was scare and panic the audience, and that is a sign of a bad president.  If some proper fixes are made to the current health-care industry, which is not ia "monopolistic" form today, the "one dollar out of every five" is defective thought, and if a complete rebuilding of the health-care industry into what Barack Obama wants--a "monopolistic" entity--is created, the health-care industry in the country will be worse.  By the way, to fix some type of big system, a smart man would do a test case first--a smart man would not completely replace a big system without tests, and it is already known the national-health-care systems in Canada and the United Kingdom are failing, and it is well known the health-care system in the United States of America is the best in the world, though it has some problems.  Why replace the entire system, unless the goal is to destory the country?  See my document entitled Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind.]

    Monday, June 8, 2009:
    "...On Friday, we learned that we had lost an additional 345,000, ah, jobs in the month of May.  That was far less than was expected, ah, but it's still too many.  We're still in the middle of a very deep recession that was years in the making, and it's gonna take, ah, a considerable amount of time...."  [Enjoy the next few comments that I present.]
   "...When we arrived here, we were confronting the most significant recession since the Great Depression...."  [Barack Obama lied again about what was happening when he took office.  The most significant recession was the recession of the early 1980s, which came about through the policies of U.S. President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat.]
    "...and I signed the Recovery Act [the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009] into law, ah, just over a hundred days ago, ah, and we've done more than ever, faster than ever, more responsibly than ever to get the gears of the economy moving again...."  [Barack Obama lied, and, by the way, in the previous week, Vice President Joe Biden had said, "...We know some of this money will be wasted...."]
    "...saved, as you said Joe, at least 150,000 jobs...."   [Barack Obama lied again.  Notice the 345,000 jobs that were lost in May 2009.  How can Barack Obama report 150,000 jobs were saved?  Where is the research that shows 150,000 jobs were saved?  What does Barack Obama mean?   By the way, on this date, the unemployment rate was about 9.4%.  The total number of jobs lost in March 2009 was 742,000; the total number of jobs lost in April 2009 was 545,000.]
    "...Now we're in a position to really accelerate.  So, the goal here is that we're gonna create or save six-hundred thousand jobs of the next one-hundred days, keeping teachers in the classroom, cops on the streets, providing summer jobs for youth that are particularly hard hit in this job market, breaking ground on hundreds of new projects all across the country in clean energy, transportation, and so on, and we're gonna do it continuing ta, ah, operate in a, ah, transparant fashion so that taxpayers know this money is not being wasted on a bunch of boondoggles.  Ah, and, and I think that sometimes good news comes in what you don't heard about, and you haven't heard, ah, a bunch of scandals--knock on, knock on wood, so far...."  [Barack Obama said that now he can really get going to create or save 600,000 jobs of the next one-hundred days!]

    Thursday, June 11, 2009 (in Green Bay, Wisconsin, at a "Town Hall Meeting" about health care):
    "...The more we are incentizing high quality primary care, prevention, wellness, management of chronic illnesses, and one of the things it turns out is that about twenty percent of the patients account for eighty percent of the care and the cost of the health-care system, and if we can get somebody first of all who is overweight to lose weight so that they don't become diabetic, we save tons of money...."  [Okay!  Remember: This document up to this point has shown example after example after example of how Barack Obama lies regularly, so now you should be aware Barack Obama can not be trusted or believed.  Besides being a liar, Barack Obama has other problems, such as a dislike for the country and The U.S. Constitution, and I show through other documents at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, such as Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind, those problems.  Now, study the text on his quotation, and then go on to the next paragraphs.]
    "...If you like your health-care plan, you'll be able to keep your health-care plan.  And don't let people scare you--if you like what you've got, we're not going to make you change, but in order to  preserve what's best about our health-care system, we have to fix what doesn't work.  And we've reached the point where doing nothing about the cost of health care is no longer an option.  The status quo is unsustainable.  If we don't act and act soon to bring down costs, it will jeopardize everybody's health care...." [How can you keep your health-care plan in the future, if the federal government pushes you to also buy into the federal system, which, at this point, appears very likely?  How can you keep your health-care plan in the future, if the plan goes out of business, having tried to compete with a government-run system that can offer anything and everything (at first) so that people will stop buying private-sector-offered health-care insurance?  Barack Obama does not want you to listen to people who have heard some of the features of the proposed system, which are bad proposals, and to people who have been showing the government-controlled health-care systems in Canada and the United Kingdom are failing, and the proposed U.S. system is being designed like the system in the United Kingdom.  Barack Obama is pushing fear!  Have you heard any public discussion about what is not working with the health-care system in the country, which is the best health-care system in the world?  Republicans in the U.S. Congress have not been involved in putting the proposed system together--they surely were not involved in setting up initial parts for a system, which appear in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which was pushed through the U.S. Congress quickly, giving no politician in the U.S. Congress chance to read it before having to vote on it.  Have you noticed in previous statements shown in this document how Barack Obama does not like the "status quo" of anything about the country and how everything has to be done quickly (or the world will end)?]
    "...I also strongly believe that one of the options in the exchange should be a public insurance option.  Now, and the reason is not because we want government take over of health care.  I've already said it!  You've got a private plan that works for you, that's great!  But we want some competition.  If the private insurance companies have to compete with a public option, it'll keep 'em honest, and it'll keep, help keep their prices down...."  [Barack Obama is a liar and is lying when he says that he does not want the government to take control, since he has already taken control of some big banks and two big car companies.  What is his nonsense about competition?  There is competition!  There are many, many doctors competing for patients, and there are many, many hospitals competing for patients, and there are many, many insurance companies competing for patients.  (Have you not seen all the advertisements for hospitals and insurance plans over the years?)  Insurance companies are kept honest, being regulated by laws, such as by state laws, and, for instance, in Michigan, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan is regulated as to what it can charge for premiums, and state governments have make set laws that set minimum limits on what must be covered.]
    "...There are some folks who say--'Socialized medicine.'  You hear that all the time--'Socialized medicine.'  Well, socialized medicine would mean that the government would basically run all of health care.  They would, you know, hire the doctors, run the hospitals--they just run the whole thing.  Ah, Great Britain has a system of socialized medicine.  Nobody's talking about doing that.  All  right?  So, when you're hearing people saying 'socialized medicine,' understand I don't know anybody in Washington who is proposing that--certainly not me...."  [The government does not have to hire doctors and run hospitals to control the medical industry in the country--the government only needs to set down laws that make doctors and hospitals do such and such.  Barack Obama really lied when he says that he does not know anyone proposing a socialized system, since the proposed system, which is a Former U.S. Senator Tom Daschle (a Democrat)  project, is a socialize system.]
    "...Now, how this debate is gonna evolve over the next eight weeks--I'm very open-minded, and if people can show me here's a good idea and here's how we can get it done, and it's not something that I've thought of, ah, I'm happy to steal people's ideas.  You now, I, I, I'm not, I'm not ideologically driven one way or another about it...."   [Notice the eight-week deadline.  Why is there a dire deadline?  And, yes, Barack Obama would probably be happy stealing the ideas of others, since Barack Obama has already done stealing while being the U.S. President, such as by stealing bond holders' equity in and potential control of Chrysler and General Motors.]
    "...This next eight weeks is going to be critical, though, and you need to be really paying attention and putting pressure on our members of Congress to say there's no excuses--if we don't get it done this year, we're probably not going to get it done...."  [Why is it "critical"?  It is not "critical."  Why would a bill for a national-health-care system not get passed later?  Barack Obama can simply work to push another national-health-care-system bill through the U.S. Congress later--maybe next week or next month (Barack Obama will be in office another three years and a half or so).  Barack Obama's speech is all a scare tactic and a fear campaign!  Ask yourself: Should there not be public discussion about a national-health-care system and no rush to put a system in place?]
    "...Government can't do all of this.  I'm the first one to acknowledge this.  That's why I'm always puzzled when people...they're, they go out there creating this bogeyman about how Obama wants government-run everything.  I don't want government to run stuff!  I, like I said, I've got enough stuff to do.  I've got North Korea, and I've got Iran, and I've got Afghanistan and Iraq, and I, I, I don't know where people get this idea that I want, I want to run stuff, or I want government to run stuff...."  [Study this piece of text, and notice the lies, and notice how he wants you to think--Yes, He is busy, so how can he take on the work of running a system?  Remember: Barack Obama is not going to be the person who runs the system--government officials will run the system.]

    On Friday, June 12, 2009 (Barack Obama commented on election in Iran):
    "...Ah, we are excited to see, ah, what appears to be a robust debate taking place in Iran, and, obviously, after the speech, ah, that I made in Cairo, we tried to send a clear message that, ah, we think there is the possibility of change, ah, and, you know, ultimately, the election is for the Iranians to decide, ah, but, just, as, as been true in Lebanon, what's, ah, can be true in Iran as well is that you're seeing, ah, people looking at new, ah, possibilities, and, ah, whoever ends up winning, ah, the election in Iran, the fact that there's been a robust debate hopefully will help, ah, advance, ah, our ability to engage them in new ways...."  [What is this mess?  We can see Barack Obama noted that he thinks his speech was important to the election process in Iran; an election of a president-like person was taking place on this day.  Actually, Iran is ruled by a group of religious leaders and not a president-type person who is supposedly elected.  By the way, over the next several days at least, Iranians would protest in the streets over the election, which people believed was a sham, and some protesters would be hurt or killed by military persons.]

    On Monday, June 15, 2009 (Barack Obama spoke to doctors in Chicago, Illlinois):
    "...Public option is not your enemy, it is your friend--I believe.  Let me also say that, I, let me, ah, also address a illegitimate concern that's being put foward by those who are claiming that a public option is somehow a Trojan horse for a single-payer system.  Now, I'll be honest!  There are countries were a single-payer system works pretty well...."  [First, there is no country where a single-payer system--a government-run system--works well!  Second, do not let yourself become to believing the government, especially under liar Barack Obama,  is "your friend."   Third, worry when Barack Obama says, "I'll be honest."  Fourth, notice the stumbling in his speech pattern.]
    "...So, when you hear the naysayers claim that I'm trying to bring about goverment-run health care, know this--They're not telling the truth...."   [Barack Obama lied again!  Barack Obama is trying to set up a government-run health-care system.  You should see Barack Obama gave no facts about the opposition, but Barack Obama was trying to scare his listeners about the opposition.]
    "...Our largest companies are suffering as well.  A big part of what led General Motors and Chrysler into trouble in recent decades was the huge costs they racked up providing health care for their workers--costs that made them less profitable and less competitive with auto makers around the world.  If we do not fix our health-care system, America may go the way of GM--paying more, getting less, and going broke...."  [Again, Barack Obama used scare tactics, as he does with everything, as if the world will end tomorrow, which it will not.]
    "......When it comes to the cost of our health care, the status quo is unsustainable.  To reform is not a luxury, it is a necessity.  And when I hear people say 'Well, why are you taking this on right now, you've got all these other problems?'  I keep on reminding people, 'I'd love to be able to defer these issuses, but we can't.'   I know there's been much discussion about what reform would cost,  and rightly so.  This is a test, whether we--Democrats and Republicans alike--are serious about holding the line on new spending and restoring fiscal disipline.  But let there be no doubt, the cost of inaction is greater.  If we fail to act, premiums will climb higher, benefits will erode further, the rolls of the uninsured will swell to include milliions more Americas, all of which will affect your practice.  If we fail to act, one out of every five dollars we earn will be spent on health care within a decade, and in thirty years, it will be about one of every three, a trend that will mean lost jobs, lower take-home pay, shuttered businesses, and a lower standard of living for all Americans...."  [Barack Obama used this text to spread fear, and since Barack Obama has shown himself to be a perpetual liar, all his facts, which are few, are suspect.  Remember: Barack Obama has already added more than ten-trillions dollars to the national debt over the next then years, and that is bad--Barack Obama is the big spender, spending money that country does not have.]
    "...But while significant individual reforms have been made--such as Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children's Health Insurance Program--efforts at comprehensive reform that covers everyone and brings down costs have largely failed.  A part of the reason is because the different groups involved--doctors, insurance companies, businesses, workers, and others--simply couldn't agree on the need for reform or what shape it would take.  And if we're honest, another part of the reason has been the fierce opposition, fueled by some interest groups and lobbyists, opposition that has used fear tactics to paint any effort to achieve reforms as an attempt to--yes--socialize medicine...."  [Barack Obama is making the people who have showing the true facts to be liars, but, remember, Barack Obama is a liar so his statement is defective.  By the way, little debate has been done before the public about a national-health-care system, and, in fact, it is the Democrats in the U.S. Congress that are controlling the creation of a national-health-care system.  Notice Barack Obama's use of "honest" in this piece of text.]
    "...We know the moment is right for health-care reform.  We know this is a historic opportunity we've never seen before and may not see again...."  [Wrong!  For one, the moment is not right, because Barack Obama, who is a radical and a communist and a Marxist, is not the man that you want to set up your health-care system.]
    "...But we also know that there are those who will try and scuttle this opportunity no matter what, who will use the same scare tactics and fear mongering that has worked in the past, who will give warnings about socialized medicine and government takeovers, long lines and rationed care, decisions made by bureaucrats and not doctors--we have heard this all before.  And because these fear tactics have worked, things have kept getting worse...." [Has fear mongering or the truth worked in the past?]

    On Tuesday, June 16, 2009 (a statement about Iran's election):
    "...You have seen some initital reaction from the supreme leader that, ah, indicates that he understands the Iranian people have deep concerns about the election.  Now, it's not productive, given the history of U.S.-Iranian relations, ta been seen as meddling--the U.S. President---meddling in Iranian elections.  What I will repeat and what I said yesterday is that when I see violence directed at peaceful protesters, when I see peaceful descent being surpressed, wherever that takes place--it is of concern to me, and it's a concern to the American people...."  [This statement was about the best that Barack Obama could muster up in relation to the protests over the election in Iran, and what was evident over the week was Barack Obama made no statement that really supported the protesters or what could be a potential revolution going on in Iran, where, by the way, many citizens are pro-U.S.A.]

    On Tuesday, June 16, 2009 (an interview):
    "...Well, this is something that keeps me awake at night.  There's no doubt that we've got a serious problem in terms of our long-term deficits and debt.  I make no apologies for having acted short-term to deal with our recession.  I think the vast majority of economists--conservative and liberal--felt that extraordinary interventions were necessary to prevent us from slipping into a potentionally deep depression.  But as soon as this economy recovers and that means planning now and starting ta take some steps now to deal with it, we're gonna have to close that gap between the amount of money coming in and the amount of money going out...." [John Harwood of The New York Times wondered about Barack Obama's having to curb benefits for entitlement programs, using means testing, raising the retirement age, et cetera.]
    "Yes!"  [Barack Obama answered the interviewer if unemployment was going to get to ten percent this year.]  "Yes!  Ah, I think that what you've seen is that the pace of job loss has slowed, and I think that the economy is going to turn around, but, as you know, jobs are a lagging indicator.  Ah, and we've got to produce a hundred-and-fifty-thousand jobs every month just to keep pace, just ta flatten this out."  [The interviewer wondered when the economy will start to come back.]  "You're starting to see the engines of the economy turn, it's gonna take a long time...."

    On Wednesday, June 17, 2009 (Barack Obama talked about proposed financial laws):
    "....It is an indisputal fact that one of the most significant contributors to our economic downturn was a unraveling of major financial institutions and lack of adaquate regulatory structures to prevent abuse and excess.  A culture of irresponsibility took root from Wall Street to Washington to Main Street....."  [Wrong!  There has always been a lot of regulation on the financial industry, done through, for one, "federal acts," and you should see my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, which shows the main cause of the economic collapse.]
    "...In recent years, financial innovators, seeking an edge in the marketplace, produced a huge of new and complex financial instruments.  And these products, such as asset-based securities, were designed to spread risk, but unfortunately ended up concentrating risk.  Loans were sold banks, banks packaged these loans into securities, investors bought these securities--often with little insight into the risks to which they were exposed.  And it was easy money while it lasted.  But these schemes were built on a pile of sand...."   [Here is more crap from Barack Obama.  The federal government pushed banks and mortgage-loan companies into giving out subprime loans, and the loans were then packaged into investment vehicles--because something had to be done with them, since that is the way of the mortgage-loan business.  See my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man.]
    "...Meanwhile, executives compenstation--unmoored from long-term performance or even reality--rewarded recklessness rather than responsibility.  And this wasn't just the failure of individuals--this was a faillure of the entire system...."  [All this text is is Barack Obama'a attack on people making money--Barack Obama does not like people making money, especially, it seems, if it is more than he is making.]
    "...We did no choose how this crisis began, but we to have a choice in the legacy this crisis leaves behind.   So, today, my administration is proposing a sweeping overhaul of the financial regulatory system--the transformation on a scale not seen since the reforms that followed the Great Depression...."  [Barack Obama is trying to take over more financial institutions!]
    "...I've always been a strong believer in the power of the free market.  It has been and will remain the engine of America's progress, the source of prosperity that's unrivaled in history.  I believe that jobs are best created not by government but by businesses and entrepreneurs who are willing to take a risk on a good idea...."  [There is no evidence that Barack Obama is a strong believer in the power of the free market.]
    "....I believe that our role is not to desparage wealth but to expand its reach, not to stifle the market but to strenghten its ability to unleash the creativity and innovation that still makes this nation the envy of the world...."  [To Barack Obama, saying this statement must have gagged him.]
    "....We're proposing a new and powerful agency charged with one, just one job--looking out for ordinary consumers...."  [Barack Obama has such compassion and empathy for the "little guy."  Do not believe it, since he has put people, such as workers at auto makers and auto dealers, out of work.]
    "...And this is essential, for this crisis was not just the result of decisions made by the mightist of financial firms, it was also the result of decisions made by ordinary Americans to open credit cards, take out home loans, take on other financial obligations. We know there were many who took out loans they knew they couldn't afford, but there were also millions of Americans who signed contracts that they didn't always understand offered by lenders who didn't always tell the truth...."  [Such garbage this statement is.  For one, a person is supposed to understand a contact, such as by getting help to understand it from a lawyer, before signing the contract.  And to Barack Obama, of course, it is always the mortgage-loan people who are the bad guys.  History shows Barack Obama hates business people.]

    On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 (a press conference):
    "...Well, why would it drive private insurance out of business?  If...if private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality heah, health care, if they tell us there're offering a good deal, then why is it that the government, which they say can't run anything, suddenly is gonna drive them out of business.  That's not logical!"  [This was the answer to a reporter who wondered if a national-health-care system would drive private insurance out of business, and such idiot thought Barack Obama gave, as he stumbled through the presentation of the thought.  How can private insurers compete with an entity--the federal government--that can (at least a first) offer the same care for less money, not caring how much is spent, which is money that will increase the national debt, and the federal government's offer will cause people to leave private-insurance coverage or will cause employers--not able to compete wth the federal government--to drop coverage for employees?  Barack Obama lied!]
    "...There's no doubt that we must preserve what's best about our health-care system, and that means allowing Americans who like their doctor and their health-care plans to keep them.  But unless we fix what's broken in our current system, everyone's health care will be in jeopardy.  Unless we act, premiums will climb higher, benefits will erode further, and the rolls of the uninsure will swell to include millions more Americans.  Unless we act, one out of every five dollars that we earn will be spent on health care within a decade...."
        "...And the amount our government spends on Medicare and Medicaid will eventually will grow larger than what our government spends on everything else today.  When it comes to health care, the status quo is un, unsustainable and unexceptable, so reform's not a luxury--it's a necessity...."
   "...I don't think that's accurate.  Ah, it, it. Track what I've been saying.  Right after the election, I said that we had profound concerns about the nature of the election but that it was not up to us to determine, ah, what the outcome was.  As soon as violence broke out--in fact, in anticipation of potential violence--we were very clear in saying that violence was unexceptable, that that was not how governments operate...."    [Major Garrett of Fox News wondered why it took Barack Obama so long to speak out about Iran, which on June 12, 2009, held a national election, which was quickly followed by citizens holding protests and was followed by the beating of protesters and the killing of some protesters by government officials.]
    "...As I said in Cairo, suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away.  The Iranian people have a universal right to assembly and free speech.  If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect those rights and heed the will of its own people.  It must govern through consent and not coersion.  That's what Iran's own people are calling for, and the Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government...."
    "...The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, the beatings, and imprisonments of the last few days.  I strongly condemn these unjust actions, and I join with the American people in mourning each and every innocent life that is lost.  I've made it clear that the United States respects the soverntry of the Islamic Republic of Iran and is not interfering with Iran's affairs, but we must also bare witness to the courage and the dignity of the Iranian people into a remarkable opening within Iranian society, and we deplore the violence against innocent civillians anywhere that it takes place.  The Iranian people are trying to have a debate about their future ...."    [Notice how Barack Obama called the protests a "debate," which is a term that does not apply to what is going on.]
    [Now carefully study the next four paragraphs that end this section, which are related to things that U.S. President Ronald Reagan said in December 1981 during a time when the Polish government was attacking its people, not unlike what the Iranian government is going to its people.  On December 23, 1981, U.S. President Ronald Reagan made an appearance before the American public and the world to talk about the revolt in Poland, which has a commmunist government:
    "...As I speak to you tonight, the fate of a proud and ancient nation hangs in the balance.  For a thousand years, Christmas has been celebrated in Poland, a land of deep religious faith, but this Christmas brings little joy to the courageous Polish people.  They have been betrayed by their own government.  The men who rule them and their totalitarian allies fear the very freedom that the Polish people cherish.  They have answered the stirrings of liberty with brute force, killings, mass arrests, and the setting up on concentration camps.  Lech Walesa and other Solidarity leaders are imprisoned, their fate unknown.  Factories, mines, universities, and homes have been assaulted.  The Polish govenment has trampled underfoot solid committments to the U.N. charter and the Helsinki accords.  It has even broken the Gdansk agreement of August 1980, by which the Polish government recognized the basic right of its people to form free trade unions and to strike...."
    "...I urge the Polish government and its allies to consider the consequences of their actions.  How can they possibly justify using naked force to crush a people who ask for nothing more than the right to lead their own lives in freedom and dignity.  Brute force may intimidate, but it cannot form the basis of an enduring society, and the ailing Polish economy cannot be rebuilt with terror tactics...."
    "...I want emphatically to state tonight that, if the outrages in Poland do not cease, we cannot and will not conduct business as usual with the perputrators and those who aid and abet them.  Make no mistake, their crime will cost them dearly in their future dealings with America and free peoples everywhere.  I do not make this statement lightly or without serious reflection.  We have been measured and deliberate in our reaction to the tragic events in Poland...."]

    Wednesday, June 24, 2009 (from a prime-time television special on ABC-TV):
    "...And we're not gonna solve every difficult problem in terms [of] end-of-life care.  A lot of that is gonna have to be we as a culture and a society starting to make better decisions within our own families and, and, ah, for ourselves, but what we can do is make sure that at least some the waste that exists in the system that's not making anybody's mom better, ah, that is loading up on additional tests or additional drugs, that the evidence shows is not necessarily gonna improve care, that at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that--you know what?--maybe this isn't gonna help.  Maybe, you're better off, ah, not having the surgery but taking the pain killer...."  [Before I give you the general theme of the question, I have to make comments.  Barack Obama showed what a nitwit he is, and Barack Obama showed what a cold mind for other people that he has.  Read over this statement several times, and notice the nonsense that is in his mind.  Now, I note that the question came from a woman who noted that five years ago, her mom, who was about one-hundred years of age, got a pacemaker, having been told not to get one by one doctor but having been told to get one by another doctor, and one reason it was said that the woman (the mom) could get one is the woman was doing well with everyday life, and the woman (the mom) is still alive today.  The questioner wonder whether there would simply be a cutoff feature in relation to diseases and age (where a chart might say that no work will be done or no medicine will be provided no matter how good a patient's living ability is) or there would be a human determination about each patient (focusing on the overall health of the patient).  Oh, what was Barack Obama's nonsense about not having surgery but having a pain killer?  A pain killer cannot do what a pacemaker can do.]
    "...And you're absolutely right that, if it's my family member, if it's my wife, ah, it's my children, if it's my grandmother, I always want them to get the very best care.  But here's the problem that we have in our current health-care system is that, there is a whole bunch of care that's being provided that every study, that every bit of evidence that we have indicates may not be making us healthier...."  (Generally speaking, the question related to this statement was about whether, if there was a national-health-care system, if your family were to participate in it, if a family member was ill and things were not going well, and if there was a procedure not covered by the plan, would he (Barack Obama) go out of the plan or would he accept only what was available through the plan.  Notice how Barack Obama did not answer the question, and notice how Barack Obama went on to another topic.]

    [Let me put in this special section, and it contains dialoque from the "infomercial" that was shown on ABC-TV about health care on Wednesday, June 24, 2009:
    Diane Sawyer: "I can reverse the order a little bit, Mr. President.  I'd like to ask a question of him (a man associated with Aenta, an insurance company) and then let you comment on his answer.  Mr. Williams, Aetna,...an insurance company we hear all over the country, people see their premiums going up 119% in the last several years, they see the profits of the insurance companies, and the billions and billions of dollars, even in the lean year, they see profits in the billions of dollars.  Is the President right, you need to be kept honest?"
    Ron Williams (CEO of Aetna): "It's difficult to compete against a player who's also the person who's refereeing the game.  And so I think in the context of thinking about a, a government plan--what we say is let's identify the problem we're trying to solve, let's work collaboratively with physicans, hospitals, and other health-care professionals, and make certain that we solve the problem, as opposed to introduce a new competitor who has the rule-making ability the government would have."
    Barack Obama: "First of all, I want to say that, ah, Mr. Walters has been very cooperative.  We've been having a series of conversations and I appreciate the constructive, ah, manner in which we've been, ah, ah, trying to work together.  But I just want to make clear that, ah, the government, whatever rules it provides to insurers, a public plan would have to abide by the same rules, so we're not talking about unle, unequal playing field, we're talking about a level playing field...."
    [Garbage--this we did not get from Ron Williams.  Such garbage we did get from Barack Obama.  It is not a level playing field with the federal government offering a plan, since, for one, the federal government can lose all the money it wants (since the money comes from taxpayers or paper can be printed), while companies cannot stay in business if they lose money.  Insurance companies are already regulated by the federal goverment and state governments!]

    On Tuesday, June  30 2009:
    "...Those who have tried to pull Iraq into the abyss of disunion and civil war are on the wrong side of history.  Finally, the very fact that Iraqis are celebrating this day is a testament to the courage, the capability, and commitment of every single American who has served in Iraq...."  [Here is a comment made by Barack Obama on February 10, 2007: "...It's time to admit that no amount of American lives can resolve the political disagreement that lies at the heart of someone else's civil war.  That's why I have a plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008.  Let the Iraqis know, letting the Iraqis know that we will not be forever is our last best hope to pressure the Sunni and Shia to come to the table and find peace...."]

    On Tuesday, July 7, 2009:
    "...Make no mistake, this change did not come from any one nation.  The Cold War reached a conclusion because of the actions of many nations over many years and because the people of ussia and Eastern Europe stood up and decided that its end would be peace...."  [Barack Obama spoke to graduating students at the New Economic School, Moscow, Russia.  This statement shows even more hate for the United States of America, because he cannot bring himself to note how instrumental the United States of America was in bringing down the Soviet Union in the 1980s, and notice he could not give credit to U.S. President Ronald Reagan or any other previous presidents of the country.  Barack Obama has a head fill with crap and hate.]

    On Friday, July 17, 2009:
    "...Those who are betting against this happening this year are mistaken.  We are going to get this done.  We will reform health care.  It will happen this year.  I am absolutely convinced of that.  I believe that members of Congress are prepared to work as hard as it is gonna take to make this happen...."  [Barack Obama is talking about what I know to be on this date as the bad health-care bill in the U.S. Congress, which, for one, will give health care to illegal aliens.  Think about that!  What is the upper limit for the number of illegal aliens that can suck money out of the country by getting free health care?  The free health care could cover all the people outside of the United States of America who come to the United States of America---millions and millions.  You should see Barack Obama is purposely trying to kill the country!]
    "...This consensus has brought us closer to the goal of health-insurance reform than ever before.  Now, we got to get over the finish line, and part of this process is figuring out how to pay for it...."  [The country is in a recession, and the health-care industry is not totally broken, but Barack Obama wants to change the health-care industry completely, and that is a very bad idea.]
    "....We cannot add to our deficit over the next decade, and I mean it!...."  [Do you believe Barack Obama's statement?]
    [Note: You should see my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which has information that shows the health-care proposal as it is on this date will save no money and which can be reached by using this link: Health.]

    On Monday, July 20, 2009 (at the Children's National Medical Center):
    "...Just the other day, one Republican Senator said--and I'm quoting him now--'If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo, it will break him.'  Think about that!  This isn't about me.  This isn't about politics.  It's about a health-care system that is breaking America's families, breaking America's businesses, and breaking America's economy.  And we can't afford the politics of delay and defeat when it comes to health care--not this time, not now...."  [This statement was in response to a statement that had been recently made by U.S. Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina. and the U.S. Senator's statement had been: "...If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo, it will break him, and we will show that we can--along with the American people--begin to push those freedom solutions that work in every area of our society...."  Jim DeMint is one of the partriots of the country who is fighting against the liar known as Barack Obama.]

    Tuesday, July 21, 2009 (talking at a left-wing blogger event):
    "...You know, I, I have to say that I am not familiar with the provision you're talking about...." [Barack Obama answered this question: "...opinion piece from Investor's Business Daily, ah, where they're saying that, ah, HR-3200 will make individual private medical insurance illegal and they actually quote from Section 102 of the bill, which is grandfathering, ah, existing policies.  Is this true--Will, will people be able to keep their insurance and will insurers be able to, hum, write new policies even though, ah, HR-3200 is passed?"  Note: The question was about private health insurance companies being destroyed by the proposed health-care legislation.  For weeks, Barack Obama had been pushing the health-care bill on the public, and, here, you can see he does not know what is in the bill.  In addition, Barack Obama has been pushing people in the U.S. Congress to pass the health-care bill quickly, quickly, quickly, or the country is doomed.  You should see Barack Obama is pushing to push whatever the bill is into law--there is no real care in his mind about what the bill will do.  Note: I think Barack Obama only wants the bill to ultimately hurt the health-care industry in the country and hurt people, since I believe Barack Obama likes to hurt people, as I can show, for example, by the way Barack Obama hurt bond holders related to the bankruptcy of Chrysler (Barack Obama used coercion and intimidation to make them take less than they should have gotten through the bankruptcy mess), sided with the bad Iranian government over the protesting Iranian citizens, and cared not about the stock market going down, all of which were events of the first half of 2009.]

    Wednesday, July 22, 2009 (at yet another press conference):
    "...But I think it's fair to say, number one, any one of us would be pretty angry.  Number two, the Cambridge Police, ah, acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home.  And, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from the incident is that there is a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos, ah, being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately...."  [On this day, Barack Obama was asked eleven questions by reporters, and the final question came from a reporter associated with the Chicago Sun Times, and the question focused on a police incident involving the Cambridge Police Department (Massachusetts) and a friend of Barack Obama's, Henry Gates, who was a professor at Harvard University.  By the way, Barack Obama is often aware ahead of time what the questions will be, and he can choose what questions that he would like to answer.  The answer by Barack Obama, as shown within the quotation marks above, makes up the third big incident that shows that Barack Obama is a racist, a hater of whites in the United States of America; the first main publicly known incident is his being a part of Racist Reverend Jeremiah Wright's church for about twenty years, and the second incident is Barack Obama's recommending Sonia Sotomayer, a racist, as a candidate for judge on the U.S. Supreme Court.  I say that, if Barack Obama was a good man, he would not have touched the question, since the question was about a local police event--something that should not be any concern of a President of the United States of America.  But, of course, the event involved a close friend of Barack Obama's, Henry Gates, who works at Harvard University, where Barack Obama spent some time.  Oh, Barack Obama commented on the event, even though he knew little about the event, as he noted by saying: "...not having been there and not seeing all the facts...."  Keep in mind: Barack Obama is a "race baiter," a person who purposely tries to stir up trouble between the races.]

    On Tuesday, August 11, 2009:
    "...This is another example of how, ah, the media ends up just completely distorting what taken place.  What we've said is that, if somebody has, if you get an e-mail from somebody that says, for example, 'Obama care is creating a death panel.'  Foward us the e-mail, and we will answer the question that's raised in the e-mail.  Suddenly, on some of these news outlets, this is being portrayed as 'Obama's collecting an enemies list!'"  (There is laughter from the audience.)  "Now, come on, guys!"  [This document shows that Barack Obama is a liar, and this document and other documents at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press show that Barack Obama is a dangerous man and a ill man, and Barack Obama is a man who seems to enjoy hurting people.  I say that, "Yes, Barack Obama is starting to collect an 'ememies list.'  Always expect the worst from Barack Obama."]

    On Saturday, August 15, 2009:
    "...It is true that there are certain costs associated with a private business that a government would not have to worry about.  You mentioned a couple of them.  It's conceivable that a private entity that's having to pay a certain interest rate for their money would be really undermined if the government is able to get money much cheaper implicitly because Uncle Sam backs this operation.  I think there are ways that we can address those competitive issues.  And you're absolutely right if they're not entirely addressed then that raises a set of legitimate problems...."  [Barack Obama answered a question of a student, who wondered how a private insurance corporation compete with entity (a government entity) that does not have to worry about making a profit, does not have to pay local property taxes, and is not subject to local regulations.  It is clear that a government health-care system would lead to the death of the private health-care system, since a government health-care system can undermine a private health-care system.  Study Barack Obama's statement again.]
    "...The notion that somehow just by having a public option you have the entire private marketplace destroyed is just not born out by the facts.  And, in fact, right now, you got a lot of private companies who do very well competing against government.  UPS and FedEx are doin' a lot better than the Post Office...."  [Barack Obama noted through this statement that private companies can do better the government entities an, though he is trying to sell to the public a national health-care system--in this day and age when Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security are, in essence, bankrupt and are associated with at least 50-trillion dollars in unfunded obligations.]

    On Monday, September 7, 2009 (a Labor Day Picnic with AFL-CIO people):
    "...I notice some people have already forgotten how bad it was just seven months ago.  You notice that?  They've got sort of selective amnesia.  So let's just remind them for a second--a financial system on the verge of collapse, about seven-hundred-thousand workers losing their jobs each month, the worst recession of our lifetimes, threatening to become another Great Depression.  That's what was happening just seven months ago!  That's why we took bold swift action.  That's why we passed an unprecedented Recovery Act.  And we did it without the usual Washington earmarks and pork-barrel spending.  And, Ohio, it is working...."  [Barack Obama lied even more; for example, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was filled with earmarks and pork-barrel spending!]
    "...Now, on Friday, we learned that the economy lost another 216,000 jobs in August.  And whenever Americans are losin' jobs, that's simply unexceptable.  But for the second straight month, we lost fewer jobs than the month before and the fewest jobs that we have lost in a year.  So, make no mistake, we're movin' in the right direction.  We're on the road to recovery...."  [Such foolishness Barack Obama spouted.]
    "...And because we're so close to real reform, suddenly the special interests are doing what they always do, which is just try to scare the heck out of people.  Now, I've got, I've, I've got a question for all these folks who say we're goin' to pull the plug on grandma, it's all about illegal immigrants...."  [The topic of this statement was health care, and the American public has been rising up against the health-care features known in the health-care bill of the U.S. House of Representatives, such as at "town hall" meetings, and the American public is the "special interests" to whom he must have been referring.]

    On Wednesday, September 9, 2009 (on Good Morning America):
    "...I, out of an effort to give Congress the ability to do their thing and not, ah, step, ah, step on their toes, ah, probably left to much ambiguity out there, which allowed then opponents of reform to come in and to fill up the air waves with a lot of nonsense--everything from this ridiculous idea that we were setting up 'death panels' to false notions that, ah, this was designed to provide health insurance ta illegal immigrants.  And then this broader notion of, of government take over of health care, which none of the bills that worked their way through Congress ever envisioned...."    [This statement was made to Robin Roberts of Good Morning America during an interview.  Barack Obama lied again and again.  For example, the health-care bill of the U.S. House of Representatives of the time, which was known as "HR 3200," did have a feature that provided health care to illegal aliens, but notice how he said "health insurance" in his statement.  The American public was able to read HR 3200, and the American public did see bad features, some of which showed "death panels" would be created, though the panels would not officially be called "death panels."  You should see the "Sarah Palin" segment of my document entitled Patriots of the U.S.A. and the Counter-Counter Revolution.  Oh, a government health-care law of any type like that of HR 3200 would result in government-run health care.]

    On Wednesday, September 9, 2009 (a prime-time address to the U.S. Congress):
    "...Until those businesses that seek capital and credit can thrive, until all responsible homeowners can stay in their homes, that is our ultimate goal.  But thanks to the bold and decisive action we've taken since January, I can stand here with confidence and say that we have pulled this economy back from the brink...."  [On this day, in the evening, Barack Obama spoke to a joint session of the U.S. Congress, and his main topic was health care, and much of the speech had lies.  For example, the economy is not back from the brink, given the unemployment rate is at at least 9.7 percent, and it is really about 16.8 percent, if all the facts about workers or potential workers are taken into account.]
    "...It has been nearly a century since Theodore Roosevelt first called for health-care reform, and ever since nearly every president and Congress whether Democrat or Republican has attempted to meet this challenge in some way.  A bill for comprehensive health reform was first introduced by John Dingell, Sr., in 1943.  Sixty-five years later, his son continues to introduce that same bill at the beginning of each sessions."  There was clapping, and John Dingell, Jr., stood up.  "Our collective failure to meet this challenge year after year, decade after decade, has led us to the breaking point...."   [So, though this statement, people learned that John Dingell, Jr., has been pushing the same nonsense for decades, and people saw that Barack Obama used the well-worn word used by communists--"collective."   What is "our collective failure" anyway?  And Barack Obama has increased the chances the country will go passed the "breaking point" because of his spending policies, and the federal government has mismanaged Medicare and Medicare and Social Security, all of which are, in essence, broke.]
    "...We are the only democracy, the only advanced democracy on Earth, the only wealthy nation that allows such hardship for its people.  There are now more than thirty-million American citizens who cannot get coverage...."  [For months and months, the Democrats have been pushing the idea that about "47 million" persons are without health care, but, on this day, Barack Obama tried to remove illegal immigrants from the discussion--though they have been part off the discussion for months by the Democrats.  However, what we still have is Barack Obama wants to destroy the medical system of the United States of America, which is made up of about 300-million persons, because of 30-million persons.  You should read the book entitled Liberty and Tyranny:  A Conservative Manifesto, which was published in early 2009 and written by Mark R. Levin, who showed how many people in the country around 2008-2009 were without health-care insurance--though not without health care, since everyone in the country can get health care and medical treatment and since hospitals are required by federal law to tend to all persons with emergency medical needs.]
    "...We spend one-and-a-half times more per person than on health care than any other country, but we aren't any healthier for it...."  [Who says that "we aren't healthier for it."?  What is his source of information?  It is the World Health Organization of the United Nations, which is controlled by dictators and communists and socialists?   I do not trust any information that comes from the United Nations!]
    "...There are those on the left who believe that the only way to fix the system is through a single-payer system like Canada's, where we would, where we would severely restrict the private insurance market and have the government provide coverage for everybody.  On the right, there are those who argue that we should end employer-based systems and leave individuals to buy health insurance on their own.  I've said, I have to say that there are arguments to be made for both these approaches, but either one would represent a radical shift that would disrupt the health care most people currently have.  Since health care represents one-sixth of our economy, I believe it makes more since to build on what works and fix what doesn't, rather than try to build an entirely new system from scratch...."  [Really, two of the biggest reforms from people who are on the "right" are (1) tort reform and (2) the removal of laws that only allow a person to buy health insurance from only companies that are based in the state in which the person lives.  "HR 3200," which is the main health-care bill of the U.S. House of Representatives of around this time, would cause a radical change to the health-care system in the country.]
    "...Our overall efforts have been supported by an unprecedented coalition of doctors and nurses, hospitals, seniors groups, and even drug companies, many of whom opposed reform in the past.  And there is agreement in this Chamber on about eighty percent of what needs to be done, putting us closer to the goal of reform than we have ever been.  But what we've also seen in these last months in the same partisan spectacle that only hardens the disdain many American have towards their own government.  Instead of honest debate, we've seen scare tactics.  Some have dug in ta unyielding ideological camps that offer no hope of compromise.  Too many have used this as an opportunity to score short-term political points, even if it robs the country of our opportunity to solve a long-term challenge.  And out of this blizzard of charges and counter-charges, confusion has reigned.  Well, the time for bickering is over!  The time for games has passed!  Now is the season for action!  Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do!  Now is the time to deliver on health care!  Now is the time to deliver on health care!...."  [The management of the American Medical Association and the management of AARP are two entities that have thrown in with Barack Obama's plans, but he AMA only represents a small portion of the doctors in the country, and AARP does not speak for all senior citizens.  Where did Barack Obama come up with the "eighty percent" figure?  I have heard a lot of opposition to many parts of, for instance, HR 3200!  Generally speaking, many American citizens are protesting against HR 3200, such as at "town hall" meetings, and most Republicans in the U.S. Congress are balking at the idea.  Oh, remember, you do not give up a fight or stop "bickering" when you have an enemy before you or have an enemy idea before you.  Barack Obama wants people to stop fighting and compromise on what can be defined as a collection of many pieces of crap, and a citizen should not care about partisan battles, since a citizen should want good politicians to fight against the ideas of bad politicians, such as Barack Obama, and the bad ideas of bad politicians, such as Barack Obama.]
    "...First, if you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job or Medicare or Medicaid or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have...."  [This idea is wrong and what Barack Obama said is a lie, since, for example, if a person has to alter a health-care policy in any way, the person is forced to take part in the government plan instead!]
    "...They [insurance companies] will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or a lifetime...."   [Gosh!  Medicare has had lifetime limits of features for years.  I bet a "government option," if created, would, too.]
    "...Still, given all the misinformation that's been spread over the last few months, I realize, I realize that many Americans have grown nervous about reform.  So, ta, tonight, I want to address some of the key controversies that are still out there.  Some of people's concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost.  The best example is the claim--made not just by radio and cable talk-show hosts but by prominent politicians--that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with power to kill off senior citizens.  Now such a charge would be laughable if it weren't so cynical and irresponsible.  It is a lie plain and simple...." There was clapping from the audience.  "Now, now, there are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants, this too is false!"  There was noise from the audience.  "The reforms, the reforms I am proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally."   Then, someone in the audience yelled out "Lie!"  There was noise from the audience.  "And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up, under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions...."   [You should see the "Sarah Palin" section of my document entitled Patriots of the U.S.A. and the Counter-Counter Revolution, since it covers the topic of "death panels," and you should see the "Joe Wilson" segment of my document entitled Patriots of the U.S.A. and the Counter-Counter Revolution for information about the "lie" incident.  Barack Obama did make a lie in relation to illegal immigrants!]
    "...Let me set the record straight, here.  My guiding principle is and always has been that consumers do better when there's choice and competition.  That's how the market works."  There was applause.  "Unfortunately, in thirty-four states, seventy-five percent of the insurance market is controlled by five or fewer companies.  In Alabama, almost ninety percent is controlled by just one company.  And without competition, the price with insurance goes up and quality goes down, and it makes it easier for insurance companies to treat their customers badly by cherry picking the healthiest individuals and trying to drop the sickest by over-charging small businesses who have no leverage and by jacking up rates...."  [If laws allowed a person to buy health insurance from a company based in any state in the country, there would be more competition (a person can buy automobile insurance from a company based in any state in the country).  By the way, insurance companies are highly regulated by the states in which they are based, and there is no need for more regulations from the federal government.  Wow!  Barackl Obama knows how the market works!]
    "...Now, I have no interest in putting insurance companies out of business.  They provide a legitimate service and employ a lot of our friends and neighbors.  I just want to hold them accountable...."  [Barack Obama had noted months ago that he had no interest in owning automobile companies, but, later, in early 2009, the American government and the Canadian government became partial ownership entities in U.S.A. auto companies--General Motors or Chrysler.]
    "...And to my Republican friends, I say that, rather than making wild claims about a government take over of health care, we should world together to address any legitimate concerns that you may have...."  [Yes, Barack Obama tried to persuade listeners or viewers of the event that Republicans have been making "wild claims" about the Democrats' ideas, which is incorrect.]
    "...And, and, and I will make sure no government bureaucrat or insurance-company bureaucrat gets between you and the care that you need!...."  [Do you trust Barack Obama on this thought?  I do not!  I do not believe Barack Obama has me in mind, given he seems to have only himself in mind.]
    "...First, I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits--either now or in the future."  There was applause.  "I will not sign it, if it adds one dime to the deficit now or in the future--period.  And to prove that I'm serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don't materialize...."  [For fun I will say--"Barack Obama would sign something that adds two dimes to the deficit, or three dimes to the deficit,...2,000-billion dollars in dimes to the deficit...."  Do you see the point?  And if Barack Obama does not meet the savings goals, Barack Obama is going to have to cut back on services--have to ration care--by cutting back on spending.]
    "...Second, we've estimated that most of this plan can be paid for by finding savings within the existing health-care system--a system that is currently full of waste and abuse...."  [It is public knowledge that Medicare is fraught with fraud, and it is, in essence, bankrupt by many trillions of dollars.  Take care of that problem, Barack Obama, before you create another health-care idea!]
    "...That is why not a dollar of the Medicare Trust Fund will be used to pay for this plan.  The only, the only thing this plan would eliminate is the hundreds of billions of dollars in waste and fraud as well as unwarranted subsidies in Medicare that go ta insurance companies--subsidies that do everything to pad their profits but don't improve the care of seniors...."  [There is no such thing as a "Medicare Trust Fund."  Yes, Barack Obama is beating up--unjustly--on insurance companies again!  But that is to be expected, since Barack Obama seems to hate everything about the country, such as banks, doctors, stock brokers, car-dealership owners....   I have yet to really hear Barack Obama say anything good about the country--Remember: Barack Obama has put down the United States of America while he has been visiting other counties.]
    "...And we will also create in independent commission of doctors and medical experts charged with identifying more waste in the years ahead...."  [Yes, Barack Obama wants to create another "commission" or another set of bureaucrats--more waste.]
    "...So don't pay attention to those scare stories about how your benefits will be cut, especially since some of the same folks who are spreading these tall tales have fought against Medicare in the past and just this year supported a budget that would essentially have turned Medicare into privatized voucher program.  That will not happen on my watch!  I will protect Medicare!...."  [Since the federal government has run Medicare into the ground and stole money from it for other uses, it seems that it would be better to get Medicare out of the grasp of the federal government.]
    "...And I will continue to seek common ground in the weeks ahead.  If you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen, my door is always open.  But know this--I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it's better politics to kill this plan than to approve it."  There was applause.  "I won't stand by while special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are.  If you miz, misrepresent what's in this plan, we will call you out, and I will not, and I will not accept the status quo as a solution--not this time, not now...."  [I do not want "common ground"; I want what is right and works and keeps the a central government away from having monopolistic control of the medical system in the country, and there is no comproming on that thought.  In additon, my research or information shows that Barack Obama does not listen to others; the Republicans have been given little opportunity to create features of federal bills since January 20, 2009, when Barack Obama became the president.  I think the health plan the Barack Obama has in mind for the country should be killed!  People, such as conservative-type radio talk-show hosts, have not been misrepresenting what is the main idea of a federal health-care system being pushed on the country by Barack Obama.]
    "...Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing--our deficit will grow, more families will go bankrupt, more businesses will close, more Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it the most, and more will die as a result.  We know these things to be true!...."  [Barack Obama commonly uses scare tactics like what he used in this statement.  For example, he wanted a listener or viewer to worry that they will die or others are going to die if nothing it done.  Remember: Federal law requires hospitals to care for people with emergency medical conditions--no matter what.  I say that, sometimes, it is better for politicians to do nothing, especially if the potential doer is Barack Obama, who through comments, has shown that he dislikes the country, The U.S. Constitution, which he believes is a "flawed" document, business people, doctors, stock brokers, et cetera.]
    "...I received one of those letters a few days ago.  It was from our beloved friend and colleague, Ted Kennedy.  He had written back in May, shortly after he was told that his illness was terminal.  He asked that it be delivered upon his death.  In it, he spoke about what a happy time his last months were...."  [Let me have fun with this in a logic puzzle.  Ted Kennedy died recently (August 25, 2009).  Ted Kennedy wrote to Barack Obama, writing a letter in May.  In the letter, Ted Kennedy noted to Barack Obama that the last months were a happy time.  Barack Obama could not make a statement about Ted Kennedy's last months, if the letter was written in May.  Were not the last months--June, July, and August--roughly?   To learn more about Edward "Ted" Kennedy, you should see my document entitled T.H.A.T. #65, which can be reached by using this link: T.H.A.T. #65.]
    [That is enough for this speech!  The speech had so much crap that I could write dozens of more pages, and I find the prospect unlikable.  Anyway, it is very likely that Barack Obama, a man of anger, has many more days of nonsense and lies for me to cover.]

    Friday, September 11, 2009 (in Arlington, Viriginia):
    "...On this first National Day of Service and Remembrance, we have summoned once more that ordinary goodness of America to serve our communities, to strengthen our country, to better our world.  Let us renew our common purpose.  Let us remember how we came together as one nation, as one people, as Americans, united not only in our grief but in our resolve to stand with one another, to stand up for the country we all love...."  [This day was supposed to be a remembrance of those who died because of terrorists who had hijacked planes and, for instance, had flown planes in to the World Trade Center towers (New York City, New York) on September 11, 2001, and Barack Obama made this day something like that which would be celebrated in a communist country, such as China and the USSR, giving the US a "National Day of Service" idea, in which the citizen should celebrate giving service to the federal government.]

    Saturday, September 12, 2009 (in Minnesota):
    "...Minnesota, are you fired up?" asked Barack Obama loudly (and the next few statements were also said loudly).  The crowd yelled something like "yeah."  "Ready to go?"  The crowd made more noise.  "Fire Up?"  The crowd yelled again.  "Ready to go?"  The crowd yelled again.  "Fired up?"  The crowd yelled back again.  "Ready to go?"  The crowd yelled back once again.  "They can't stop us.  Let's go get this done.  Thank you, everybody...."  [And so Barack Obama did another speech, which happened to be on the day that there was a super-big march and rally in Washington, D.C., attended by peoples of all types, who were protesting the policies, such as the socialist policies, of Barack Obama, and, at that rally, there were somewhere between one-million and two-millon persons (Blum, Tom.  "NY Home Page Virtually Ignores Sept 1 DC Rally, Gives Obama MN Speech Nearly Top Billing."  NewsBusters, 13 September 2009, 11:37 ET.).  But Barack Obama was not done, and Barack Obama appeared on 60 Minutes (of CBS-TV) on Sunday, September 13, 2009, and Barack Obama made a speech to the business community, which was an anti-business speech really, on Monday, September 14, 2009.]
       "...Now, what we've also seen in these last few months is the same partisan spectacle that has left so many of you disappointed in Washington for so long.  We've heard scare tactics instead of honest debate.  Too many have used this opportunity to score short-term political points instead of working together to solve long-term challenges.  I don't know if you agree with me, but I think the time for bickering is over.  The time for games is passed!  Now is the time for action.  Now's the time to deliver on health care for every American...."  [This statement was made during what was like a rally headed by Barack Obama and given before a crowd, and Barack Obama flapped his lips, and the same useless stuff came out.]

    Monday, September 14, 2009 (a speech to the business community):
    "...What we're calling for is for the financial industry to join us in a constructive effort to update the rules and regulatory structure to meet the challenge of this new century...."  [Yes, Barack Obama, who was in New York, said that he wanted the financial industry to accept his socialist, Marxist, fascist, communist policies!]
    "...Now, there will be those who defend the status quo--there always are.  There will be those who argue we should do less or nothing at all.  There will be those who engage in revisionist's history or have selective memories and don't seem to recall what we just went through last year...."  [This day was the anniversary Lehman Brothers going bankrupt, and I recall federal-government policies, such as those related to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, were instrumental in causing the economic problem of 2008, and Barack Obama has be adding to the problem through what he had said and through what policies he has enacted through laws, and, for some more information about the economic crisis, you should see my document entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America, a link to which exists at the end of this document.  I do not have a selective memory!  I remember!]

    Tuesday, September 15, 2009 (at the AFL-CIO convention in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania):
    "...And the fundamental test of our time is whether we will heed this lesson, whether we will let  America become a nation of the every rich and the very poor, of the haves and the have-nots, or whether we will remain true to the promise of this country and build a future where the success of all of us is built on the success of each of us.  That's the future I want to build.  That's the future the AFL-CIO wants to build...."  [The really important part of this segment is "the haves and the have-nots" set of words, which is thought that comes right out of Saul Alinsky's book entitled (in short form) Rules for Radicals, which was published in the early 1970s and was and is designed to give such persons as communists tactics that could be used to destroy the United States of America.  "The haves and have-nots" is used by Saul Alinsky to spur descent and jealousy in the minds of people, especially the poor, so that they will join in a cause to destroy the business people of the country and let the government, such as a dictatorship, run or be the entire business community so that government can make everyone equal and so that government allow no one to make more money than anyone else, though not all people do or will do the same amount of work and though some people take more effort to build their minds or develop their talents.]
    "...I refuse to let America go back to the culture of irresponsibility and greed that made it possible, back to an economy where soaring CEO salaries and shrinking middle-class income, back to the days when banks made reckless decisions and hurt Wall Street and Main Street alike!  We're not gonna go back to those days!  It'd be bad for unions and the middle class and bad for the United States of America!  We're not turning back!  We're going forward!...."  [Do you hear the determination to change the country to Marxism and communism and socialism?  There is determination in this statement made by Barack Obama.  He has hate for the business system of the country, which has been developed by individuals for decades and several centuries.  You should ask yourself--What is "going forward" in the mind of Barack Obama?  By the way, I have already shown in some of my documents, such as Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind, that Barack Obama does have a defective mind, and his mind is not a mind that you want to have involved in making decisions about your life and the future of this country.]

    [Note: You must see the "Reverend Jeremiah Wright" section of my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which will show you what beliefs about the world are in Barack Obama's mind, and the document can be reached by using this link: Crud.]

    Tuesday, September 22, 2009 (at United Nations Climate Change Summit):
    "...The threat from climate change is serious.  It is urgent, and it is growing.  Our generation's response to this challenge will be judged by history.  For if we fail to meet it boldly, swiftly, and together, we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe...."  [Barack Obama is pushing the idea that the end of the world is near, which is nonsense, and, again, Barack Obama provides no evidence of his predicted trouble.]
    "...We cannot meet this challenge unless all the largest emitters of greenhouse-gas pollution act together.  There is no other way.  We must also energize our efforts to put other developing nations, especially the poorest and most vulnerable, on a path to sustained growth...."  [How is Barack Obama going to get China and India to take part?  It seems to me China and India are not going hold back their growing economies by taking up in earnest the use of windmills and solar panels, especially when it has been shown in Europe that, for instance, windmills are a lot of hot air and are failed technology for the long run and for the economy of any country.].
    "...We have a responsibility to provide the financial and technical assistance needed to help these nations adapt to the impacts of climate change and pursue low-carbon development...."   [I say that it is not up to the United States of America to provide financial and technical assistance to the poorest countries, which have become poor or stayed poor over many, many years or decades or  centuries because of dictators, corrupt politicians, Marxists (like Barack Obama), communists, and old tribal or village ways, and, for instance, if any financial assistance were given to such defective countries, the money would not be used for the people and for anything related to climate-change battling, since corrupt politicians would use the money for their purposes (as past history shows), and, anyway, "man" is too small to battle the planet and the sun and nature in relation to climate change."  To me, what Barack Obama seems set to do is funnel money from U.S. taxpayers to corrupt foreign countries, such as dictatorships, to keep the leaders of the foreign countries in power.  Keep in mind: Barack Obama has already shown that he is like a brother to some dictators of the world.]
    "...The planet's future depends on a global commitment to permanently reduce greenhouse-gas pollution.  We know that if we put the right rules and incentives in place, we will unleash the creative power of our best scientists and engineers and entrepreneurs to build a better world...."  [No government can dictate creativity in developing new technology, since developments comes from work and more work from individuals, who cannot predict when breakthroughs will happen.  No government can unleash creative power, unless, of course, the government is wishing to get artists to purposely create art that pushes a particular person or image of a person or agenda of a person on a public, as it was being done by the National Endowment for the Arts (of the United States of America) in at least August and September 2009.]
    "...Rising sea levels threaten every coastline.  More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent.  More frequent droughts and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive...."  [These three sentences show more of the nonsense that is Barack Obama.  The statements show a defective mind.  For example, Barack Obama's mind is either in perpetual-panic mode about dying because the planet is going to die very, very soon, which is the way of an insane man, or Barack Obama's mind is simply corrupt and is working to spread panic to others so that he can make rules that will allow him to enslave other people--masses of people, like all those in the United States of America.]

    Wednesday, September 23, 2009 (before the U.N. General Assembly):
    "...We know the future will be forged by deeds and not simply words.  Speeches alone will not solve our problems.  It will take persistent action.  For those of you who question the character and cause of my nation, I ask you to look at the concrete actions we have taken in just nine months.  On my first day in office, I prohibited--without exception or equivocation--using torture by the United States of America." There was clapping.  "I ordered the prison at Guantanamo closed, and we are doing the hard work to combat extremism within the rule of law.  Every nation must know America will live its values, and we will lead by example...."  [Notice how Barack Obama referred to the United States of America as "my nation," and during the speech, Barack Obama used "my" in a similar way other times.  No, the United States of America did not use torture, as it is truly defined, and, yes, Barack Obama did make life easier for thugs and terrorists by taking away ways in which bad people could be combated by the military of the United States of America.  Barack Obama must be proud of himself through the way in which he hurt the United States of America.]
    "...Responsibility and leadership in the Twenty-first Century demand more.  In an era when our destiny is shared, power is no longer a zero-sum game.  No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation.  No world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed.  No balance of power among nations will hold.  The traditional divisions between nations of the South and the North make no sense in an interconnected world, nor do alignments of nations rooted in the cleavages of a long-gone Cold War.  The time has come to realize that the old habits, the old arguments are irrelevant to the challenges faced by our people...."  [Notice how Barack Obama is saying that the United States of America should not be strong.  I noted that, over the decades, the power of the United States of America has been good for Americans and peoples of many other countries of the world.  Notice how Barack Obama hinted that he would like such entities as NATO to no longer exist (by the way, NATO has been an entity that has been in opposition to countries like the Soviet Union and Russia.  I say that alignment of nations will always have to be, since there is good and bad in the world, and the good will have to group together, as bad does, but, of course, it seems to me Barack Obama wants one governing body in the world, and to have one governing body in the world (for him as a leader or the leader), there can be only one side, which would be like him (the bad).  Oh, try to figure out in your mind what Barack Obama means by "zero-sum game"?]
    "...We've also re-engaged the United Nations.  We have paid our bills.  We have joined the Human Rights Council.  We have signed the Convention of the Rights of Persons for Disabilities...."  [In essence, Barack Obama reported that he is putting the United States of America under the laws of other countries or is working to put the United States of America under the laws of an international body, which, it seems to me, would have many rules related to Sharia law or Islamic law.]
    "...Some of our actions have yielded progress.  Some have laid the ground work for progress in the future.  But make no mistake, this cannot solely be America's endeavor.  Those who used to chastise America for acting alone in the world cannot now stand by and wait for America to solve the world's problems alone.  We have sought in word and deed a new era of engagement with the world, and now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.  Now, if we are honest with ourselves, we need to admit we are not living up to that responsibility...."  [Ask yourself: What the heck does this mean?  I say that this collection of words from Barack Obama is a collection of nonsense.]
    "...We continue to call on Palestinians to end incitement against Israel, and we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.  The time, the time has come to relaunch negotiations without preconditions, that address the permanent status issues--security for Israelis and Palestinians, borders, refugees, and Jerusalem.  The goal is clear, two states living side by side in peace and security--the Jewish state of  Israel with true security for all Israelis and a viable independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967 and realizes the potential of the Palestinian people...."  [Israel won a war in 1967 that it did not start.]
    "...I took office in a time when many around the world had come to view America with skepticism and distrust.  A part of this was due to misperceptions and misinformation about my country.  Part of this was due to opposition to specific policies and a belief on certain critical issues, America had acted unilaterally, without regard for the interests of others.  This has fed an almost reflexive anti-Americanism, which too often has served as an excuse for collective inaction...."    [Yes, America did at times have to act "unilaterally," and, yes, America had to disregard at times "the interest of others"--enemies.  Who was Barack Obama referring to in his statement about "the interests of others."  By the way, in the eyes of the enemies of the United States of America, distrust will always be there--till Barack Obama can make the United States of America like the enemies.  Notice: Barack Obama again used "my" in this set of words.]
    "...Like all of you, my responsibility is to act in the interest of in my nation and my people, and I will never apologize for defending those interests, but it is my deeply held belief that, in the year 2009, more than at any time in human history, the interests of nations and peoples are shared...."  [Examine this set of words for yourself, since I will only do it for "myself."]
    "...In their actions to date, the governments of North Korea and Iran threaten to take us down this dangerous slope.  We respect their rights as members of the community of nations.  I've said before and I will repeat--I am committed to diplomacy that opens a path to greater prosperity and more secure peace for both nations if they live up to their obligations...."  [Hurray for Barack Obama, since he was going to conduct more and more and more and more diplomacy.]
     "...The danger posed by climate change cannot be denied.  Our responsibility to meet it must not be deferred.  If we continue down our current course, every member of this Assembly will see irreversible changes within their borders.  Our efforts to end conflicts will be eclipsed by wars over refugees and resources...."  [Do you think Barack Obama has frightened everyone in the world yet?]
    [That should be enough for you.]

    Friday, September 25, 2009 (at a press conference about Iran during "Pittsburgh Summit 2009"):
    "...As the international community knows, this is not the first time that Iran has concealed information about its nuclear program.  Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear power that meets the energy needs of its people, but the size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program.  Iran is breaking the rules that all nations must follow, endangering the global non-proliferation regime, denying its own people access to the opportunity they deserve and threatening the stability and security of the region and the world...."  [It was on September 24, 2009, that information about a "secret" nuclear facility in Iran became public knowledge or international public knowledge, and this set of words was only a small portion of all the words that Barack Obama used to make it seem he was going to get tough with Iran or used to urge the international community to get tough with Iran.  It is noted that the United States of America has known about the "secret" facility for many, many months, and I remind you that Barack Obama spoke before the United Nations about two day previously, saying nothing about the topic of Iran's "secret" nuclear facility.  Remember: In the 1990s, the United Nations made a number of resolutions about and against Iraq, and that was all useless!  By the way, "Pittsburgh Summit 2009" was a G-20-type summit.]

    Friday, October 2, 2009 (in Copenhagen, working to get an Olympics in Chicago, Illinois):
    "...There is nothing that I would like more than to step a few blocks from my family's home with Michelle and our two girls and welcome the world back into our neighborhood.  At the beginning of this new century, the nation that has been shaped by people from around the world wants a chance to inspire it once more...."  [The Olympics is about athletes from around the world, and people do not care if Barack Obama and his family would have the chance to, in essence, step outside of their home and be at the Olympics.  Barack Obama thinks everything is about him, and that is to be expected from a megalomaniac, which I believe he is.]

    Friday, October 9, 2009 (comments about being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize):
    "...I am both surprised and deeply humbled by the decision of the Noble committee.  Let me be clear, I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.  To be honest, ah, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize...."  [I heard the actual announcement, and people at the announcement site gasped when Barack Obama's name was announced, showing they could not believe what they had heard.  Oh, ask yourself, what does "...as an affirmation of an American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people of all nations" mean?]
    "...Throughout history, the Nobel Peace Prize has not just been used to honor specific achievement, it's also been used as a means to give momentum to a set of causes, and that is why I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st Century.  These challenges can't be met by any one leader or any one nation, that's why my administration's worked to establish a new era of engagement in which all nations must take responsibility for the world we seek...."  [What type of world does Barack Obama seek?  Is it a communist-controlled world?  Is it a Marxist-controlled world?  It is a world headed by Barack Obama?]

    Thursday, October 15, 2009 (in San Francisco, California):
    "... I want everybody to know who are standing in the way of progress.  I'm not tired!  [There was cheering.]  I'm just getting started!  [There was more cheering.]  You can throw whatever you want at me!  [There was more cheering.]  Keep it comin'!  We're gonna get this done!  We're gonna get health care done!  [There was cheering.]  We're gonna get clean energy done!  We're gonna get climate change done!  We're gonna fix our schools!  We are gonna to deal with the problems internationally that I was elected to deal with!  We are at a rare moment!  We've been given the opportunity to remake our world for the better...."  [Notice how Barack Obama believes he was elected to change the world or to fix the problems of the world.  Barack Obama is not working to be the President of the United States of America; he is working to be king of the world.  What are the problems, as he sees them in his mind?  Notice all the crap that he wants to do--from "cap-and-trade" legislation to "climate-change" legislation, all of which will be bad for the United States of America and the world.  And you are urged to see the document entitled World Tyranny: Warnings about the Insane Who are Trying to Create a Communist World Country, which can be reached by using this link: World.]

    Saturday, October 17, 2009 (weekly radio address):
    "This is the unsustainable path we're on.  It is the path the insurers want to keep us on.  In fact, the insurance industry is rolling out the big guns and breaking out their massive war chests to martial their forces for one last fight to save the status quo.  They're filling the airwaves with the deceptive and dishonest ads.  They're flooding Capital Hill with lobbyists and campaign contributions.  And they're funding studies designed to mislead the American people.  Of course, like clockwork, we've seen folks on cable television who know better, waving these industry-funded studies in the air.  We've seen industry insiders and their apologists citing these studies as proof of claims that just aren't true.  It's smoke and mirrors.  It's bogus.  And it's all too familiar...."  [Price Waterhouse recently released a study that showed a proposed health-care law was going to cost Americans more in health payments than was announced by Barack Obama's administration or associates.  In this quotation, Barack Obama did not give proof about why the studies were false and wrong--he simply ran off the mouth.]
    "...Every time we get close to passing reform, the insurance companies produce these phony studies as a prescription and say, 'Take one of these, and call us in a decade!'  Well, not this time!  The fact is the insurance industry is making this last-ditch effort to stop reform, even as costs continue to rise and our health-care dollars continue to be poured into their profits, bonuses, and administrative costs that do nothing to make us healthier.  It often actually goes toward figuring out to avoid covering people.  And they're earning these profits and bonuses while enjoying a privileged exception from our anti-trust laws, a matter that Congress is rightfully reviewing...."  [And what the two paragraphs show is Barack Obama is attacking another industry of the country.  Barack Obama has already attacked the automobile companies and taken over auto companies, and Barack Obama is directly attacked the doctors of the country, and Barack Obama has done more.  This Barack Obama is a deadly man!]

    Tuesday, October 20, 2009 (a DNC fund-raiser in New York City, New York, with rich people):
    "...Sometimes, Democrats can be their own worst enemies!  Democrats are an opinionated bunch!  You know, the other side, they just kind sometimes do what their told!  Democrats, ya all, thinkin' for yourselves!  I like that..., but it's time for us to make sure we finish the job here.  We are this close, and we got to be unified...."
    "...This is such a rare moment in our history.  Now's not the time to start gettin' disillusioned or that's not the time to start speaking out this is too hard.  We've got this opportunity to change our world for the better...."
    "...I don't know about you, I just want to let you know, just gettin' started!  I'm not tired!  I don't know about you, but I'm not tired!  All these folks who are throwing stuff at us, just gettin' all crazy.  You know, I'm just getting started!  I feel refreshed!  I feel energized!  And it's because of you!  So if you're willin' to get keep on goin', if you're willin' to keep on marchin', then I guarantee you, we are going succeed!...."
    [Through these three sets of words, you can see Barack Obama did another campaign speech or another rah-rah speech, which contained nothing, and I hope you noticed how he speech pattern was more like a gutter-speech pattern.]

    Wednesday, October 21, 2009 (an interview on NBC):
    "...Five years ago, six years ago, though, we were having a lot of negotiations, because Michelle was trying to figure out--'Okay, when the kids get sick, why is it that she's the one who has to take time off from her job ta go pick them up from school as opposed to me?'  What I've tried to do was, ah, learn to be thoughtful enough, ah, and introspective enough that, ah, I wasn't always having to be told that things were unfair, and then once in a while, I'd actually voluntarily say, 'You know what, let me relieve of this burden on you.'  There's no doubt that our family, like a lot of families out there, ah, were ones in which, ah, the men, ah, are still little obtuse about this stuff...."  [Such silliness this is, but it helps you understand his shallow mind.]

    Friday, October 23, 2009 (at MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts):
    "...An economy in which we all share opportunity is an economy in which we all share crisis.  We face threats to our security that seeks, ah."  He stalled and sort of cleared his throat twice.  "Wa, wa, there are threats to our security that are based on those who would seek to exploit the very interconnectedness and openness that's so essential to our prosperity...."  [And the teleprompter seemed to die again, and Barack Obama fell apart and blurted out more nonsense.]

    Monday, October 26, 2009 (at the Naval Air Station in Jacksonville, Florida):
    "...I will never hesitate to use force to protect and American people or our vital interests.  I also promise you this, and this is very important as we consider our next steps in Afghanistan--I will never rush a solemn decision of sending you into harm's way.  I won't risk your lives unless it is absolutely necessary, and if it is necessary, we will back you up to the hilt, because you deserve the strategy, the clear mission, and the defined goals as well as the equipment and support that you need to get the job done.  We are not goin' to have a situation in which you are not fully supported back here at home.  That is a promise that I will also make to you...."  [Yes, Barack Obama will always make that promise to you, but it does not mean he will keep the promise--only make it over and over and over.  And here is one of the big problem with the talk from Barack Obama this time--American soldiers are in harm's way, and Barack Obama has been stalling and has been delaying his decision about sending more troops into Afghanistan--reinforcements that generals have been asking for.]

    Tuesday, October 27, 2009 (at the DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center, belonging to Florida Power and Light, in Arcadia, Florida):
    "...It's expected to save consumers more than twenty-billion dollars over the next decade on their utility bills, and I know nobody minds seein' their utility bills cut.  I'm sorry, Lou [or, maybe, Lew], but they really don't mind that.  It'll make our grid more secure and more reliable, saving us some of the one-hundred-and-fifty-billion dollars we lose each year during power outages...."  [This statement was made, but it is nonsense, given Barack Obama has said in the past that he is going to increase energy costs significantly, and, remember, Barack Obama is pushing the idea of "cap-and-trade" legislation, which will increase the cost of energy in the country--in his efforts to save the planet from humans, especially those in the United States of America, using fossil fuels.]
    "...Smart meters will allow you to actually monitor how much energy your family is using by the month, by the week, by the day, or even by the hour...."  [For decades, people have been able to determine how much electricity that they use by looking at their electric meters, and they can calculate how much money is being spent, such as by multiplying the number of units used by the unit cost.  "Smart meters" will allow government to more closely determine how much electric energy a customer is using, and the government will be able to determine if a customer is using too much as determined by the government, and the government can limit the amount of energy used and can penalize a customer for using too much, such as through a tax of some type.]
    "...So coupled with other technologies, this is going to help you manage your electricity use and your budget at the same time, allowing you to conserve electricity during times when prices are highest, like hot summer days...."  [What did he say?  So, when you need the electricity on hot summer days--to run air conditioners--you can turn off the electricity to save money.  Great idea, ha!]
    "...Now, I have to be honest with you, though, the closer we get to this energy future, the harder the opposition is goin' to fight, ah, or we're goin' to hear from special interests and lobbyists in Washington whose interests are contrary to the interests of the American people...." [There is that "I have to be honest with you" nonsense of his.  Who are the special interests in his mind and his statement?  To me, it looks as if he was talking about consumers--who are going to want enough energy to do things and to live.  He could not be talking about power companies, who want to sell their services and serve the public as they have since the late 1800s--and have done well since the 1800s.  And what is this "energy future" that is in his defective mind?  Try to answer that.  It seems to me it will be a future with less energy, especially if he shuts down coal-based power plants, as he has stated that he wants to do, and not allow companies to make more nuclear-power-based power plants.]

    Thursday, October 29, 2009 (a press conference):
    "...I am gratified that our economy grew in the third quarter of this year.  Ah, we've come a long way since the first three months of 2009, when our economy shrunk by an alarming six-point-four precent.  In fact, the three-point-five percent growth in the third quarter is the largest three-month gain we have seen in two years, and this is obviously welcome news and an affirmation that this recession is abating and the steps we've taken have made a difference...."  [Barack Obama was referring to GDP (which is Gross Domestic Product), but it was not the private sector that grew really--it was federal government spending that spurred GDP growth, such as by giving money to people to buy cars (the rebates given out were taxed as income, though, which caught people who got the rebates by surprise).  By the way, Barack Obama was talking about a 3.5 percent increase in GDP--as it was announced to the public--but, on November 24, 2009, it was announced that the GDP figure for the third quarter was revised down from 3.5 percent to 2.8 percent, and, on December 22, 2009, the GDP number was downgraded yet again by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (of the federal government) to 2.2 percent (Mutikani, Lucia.  "U.S. GDP revised down to 2.8 pct."  Reuters, 24 November 2009.; McMaken, Ryan.  "GDP rises 2.2 percent in third quarter."  Examiner.com, 22 December 2009.).]

    Monday, November 2, 2009: (at a meeting with his economic advisors):
    "...The need for us to make up a whole lot of job loss is going to require, I think, some bold innovative action upon our part and on Congress's part and on the private sector's part...."  [There have already be stimulus plans, and, yet, Barack Obama said that he wants to take some 'bold innovative action.'  Barack Obama has tried the bold innovative action, and his action has caused deep federal debt.  The spending more great amounts of money by the federal government--money that come from the people of the country or that are borrowed--will not save the day.  (I say that, of course, Barack Obama is not really working to save the day--he is purposely trying to hurt the country.)]
    "...It's also gonna required that we look at new models for where future job growth is gonna come from, because one of the, I think, key understandings coming out of this past financial crisis is that a lot of our growth was debt driven--credit cards maxed out, home equity loans being taken out to finance, ah, a lot of purchases.  Businesses are gonna to be more cautious in terms of how they approach taking on a lot of debt.  The government is gonna have to get serious about reducing our debt levels...."  [Barack Obama passed on more nonsense.  For example, for the recently finished fiscal year for the federal government, the federal government ended up with a 1,420-billion-dollar deficit (or a 1.42-trillion-dollar deficit).  Barack Obama--in what he signed on for or passed--was instrumental in creating that deficit.]
    "...How do you get what I call a post-bubble growth model, ah, one that is sustainable?  That's what, ah, we're gonna to be discussing here today.  Ah, as I said, we got experts from, ah, a wide range of business sectors, and what we're gonna talk about is--Are there mechanisms that we can, ah, start putting in place where, ah, we see the kind of growth that used to characterize the U.S. economy--export-driven growth, manufacturing growth, and growth that pays high wages and provides, ah, a high living standards for a broad-based middle class?...."   [This is more nonsense thought and flap-doodle.]
    "...We're also in an era of fiscal constraint, which means that we gotta start planning for creative new approaches to, ah, financing, ah, these projects.  So those are the discussions we're going to be having, ah, not just today but, ah, in the weeks and months to come.  This is my administration's overriding hopes, having, ah, brought the economy back from the brink.  The question is--How are we gonna make sure that people are getting back to work, ah, and able to support their families?  It's not going to happen over night, but we will not rest until, ah, we are succeeding in generating new jobs that this economy needs...."  [Barack Obama has not brought back from the brink the private sector, since it was federal government spending that was the reason for the recently announced GDP increase.]
    "...If somebody can show me, ah, a strategy that's gonna work, ah, then we are happy to consider it...."  [This statement is another one of his standard sayings, in which he hints he is willing to listen and then never does (he has not given Republicans much input into creating federal bills, such as the Democratic Party released health-care bills known as HR 3200 and HR 3962.]
    "...I want to end by adding this.  We anticipate that we're gonna to continue to see some job losses in the weeks and months to come...."  [Yeah!  Barack Obama passed on more good news for individuals in the country.  But Barack Obama says that he is doing all the right things.  Ha!]

    Friday, November 6, 2009 (a statement to the press):
    "...Now, ah, I would also like to announce that I just signed into law a bill that would help grow our economy, save and create new jobs, and provide relief to struggling families and businesses.  The need for such a measure was made clear by the jobs report that we received this morning.  Although we lost fewer jobs than we did last month, our unemployment rate climbed to over ten percent, a sobering number that underscores the economic challenges that lie ahead...."  [On this date, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the federal government announced that the general unemployment rate was now 10.2 percent, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the "U6" employment rate became 17.5 percent (see my document entitled Detroit and Death: A View of a Future United States of America for more information about the unemployment rate, and the document can be reached by using this link: Detroit).  Barack Obama was and is still lying about his policies, since he has enacted no law that as "saved" or "created" any new jobs where it matters--in the private sector--given that more jobs were lost again in October 2009 (about 190,000 jobs); for instance, much of the spending related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (which became law on February 17, 2009) does not happen till 2010.  I remind you here that, around the time Barack Obama was pushing the U.S. Congress to enact the American Recovery and Reinvestment bill, Barack Obama was saying that the unemployment rate would not go beyond eight percent, and, in essence, he was saying that the country was doomed if the bill was not passed--quickly.  Oh, on Sunday, February 15, 2009, Dave Axelrod, who was and is a close advisor to Barack Obama, was on This Week with George Stephanopoulos and said, "...Well, that's our hope.  That's are hope.  There's no doubt that without it [the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act], that's what, that's where we were looking--double-digit unemployment--and that's what we're trying to forestall.  We want to turn this thing around, and we think that this will, will happen.  That's why the President had such a sense of urgency...."]
    "...When we first came into office, our immediate goal was to stop the free fall that caused our economy to shrink at an alarming rate.  We've succeeded in achieving that goal as our economy grew last quarter for the first time in a year.  But history tells just that job growth always lags behind economic growth, which is why we have to continue to pursue measures that will create new jobs...."  [For information about the recent increase in the Gross Domestic Product that was reported, you should see the entry for October 29, 2009.  Do you believe the economy of the U.S. can be improving when the general jobless rate in the U.S. is continuing to go higher?  Since the increase in the GDP figure was not because of improvement in the private sector, it seems you should not see an increase in jobs soon, since the growth in the private sector has not happened yet.  But, then again, Barack Obama can put more people in government jobs--as, for example, "paper pushers"--in the days to come so that it looks as if the economy is improving--though the private-sector economy is not improving.]

    Monday, November 9, 2009 (the 20th Anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall):
    "...Even as we celebrate these values, even as we mark his date, we know the freedom is never finished.  In a Berlin under seige, President Kennedy said, 'Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free.'  Few would have preceived on that day that a united Germany would be led by a woman from Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent, but human destiny is what human beings make of it...."  [This set of sentences was part of a video clip introduced by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, when she gave a speech at the site of where the "Brandenburg Gate" once existed.  Barack Obama's message did not say anything about U.S. President Ronald Reagan or Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher (of England) or even Russia, but the message did refer to Barack Obama.  Why did Barack Obama put himself in the message?  What did Barack Obama have to do with the Berlin Wall coming down?  The Germans of that past time surely were never even thinking about him or someone like him becoming the U.S. President, having other matters in mind.]

    Tuesday, November 10, 2009 (at Fort Hood, Texas):
    "...This is a time of war, and these Americans did not die on a foreign field of battle.  They were killed here on American soil in the heart of this great state and the heart of this great American community.  This is a fact that makes the tragedy even more painful, even more incomprehensible.  It may be hard to comprehend the twisted logic that led to this tragedy, but this much we do know--no faith justifies these murderous and craven acts, no just and loving God looks upon them with favor.  For what he has done, we know that the killer will be met with justice in this world and the next...."  [Barack Obama spoke more garbage.  It is publicly known that the man--Major Nidal Malik Hasan--who shot and ended up killing about a dozen persons and injuring about another three dozen persons at Fort Hood recently (November 5, 20909) is a follower of radical Islam.  And, yes, there are Imams in the world who preach a version Islam that seeks to destroy of the United States of America and other countries of the West.  By the way, it must be remembered, in early 2009, Barack Obama made it clear acts of "terrorism" would be called "manmade disasters" from now on, but I say that the shooter was a "terrorist" and the work done was an act of "terrorism" related to a deadly and dangerous sect of Islam.]
    "...The stories of those at Fort Hood reaffirm the core values that we are fighting for and the strength that we must draw upon.  Theirs are the tails of American men and women answering an extraordinary call--the call to serve their comrades, their communities, and their country.  In an age of selfishness, they embody responsibility.  In an era of division, they call upon us to come together.  In a time of cynicism, they remind us of who we are as Americans...."  [What did Barack Obama mean by "In an age of selfishness" and "In an era of division" and "In a time of cynicism"?  Barack Obama spoke nonsense.  Although it could be argued well by me that Barack Obama is attacking the people of the United States of America, since Americans do think about themselves (and family members and friends and people in need) instead of thinking about Barack Obama's "commune" or Barack Obama's community or Barack Obama's village.  It is an era of division, because people of America recognize Barack Obama is a communist, a socialist, and a Marxist and has an ill mind, and Barack Obama is working to kill the United States of America, so the people are fighting back.  I will let you think about what he meant by "In a time of cynicism" because, to me, it is a vague set of words that is not worth writing about here.]

    Thursday, November 12, 2009 (before heading to Japan):
    "...Over the past ten months, we've taken a number of bold steps to break the back of this recession.  As a result, the economy is now growing again for the first time in more than a year and faster than at anytime in the past two years.  But even though we've slowed the loss of jobs--and today's report on the continued decline in unemployment claims is a hopeful sign--the economic growth that we've seen has not yet led to the job growth that we desperately need...."  [Barack Obama lied--the private sector is not growing.]
    "...We all know that there are limits to what government can and should do, even during such difficult times.  But we have an obligation to consider every additional responsible step that we can to encourage and accelerate job creation in this country.  And that's why, in December, we'll be holding a forum at the White House on jobs and economic growth.  We'll gather CEOs and small business owners, economists and financial experts, as well as representatives from labor unions and nonprofit groups to talk about how we can work together to create jobs and get this economy moving again...."  [All Barack Obama is doing is gathering people together to talk, and it will all be useless, since Barack Obama does not listen to good ideas, because Barack Obama has his ideas--socialist idea, communistic ideas, et cetera, and through Barack Obama's actions, Barack Obama has shown his goal is to change the country, even if it hurts people, as it has already, but that is the way of an insane man.]
    "...It's important that we don't make any ill-considered decisions, even with the best of intentions, particularly at a time when our resources are so limited.  But it's just as important that we are open to any demonstratively good idea to supplement the steps we've already taken to put America back to work.  That's what this forum is about...."  [It seems to me, everytime Barack Obama speaks, he has to follow some statement with a "but" statement--he wavers on everything thought he offers, so no thought is ever concrete.]

    Friday, November 13, 2009 (a press conference in Japan):
    "...We share, I think, a vision of a world without nuclear weapons.  Ah, we recognized, though, that this is a distant goal, and we have to take specific steps in the interim to meet this goal.  It will take time.  If will not be reached through even in our own lifetimes....Obviously, Japan, ah, has unique perspective, ah, on the issue of nuclear weapons as a consequence of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I'm sure, helps to motivate the Prime Minister's deep interest in the issue.  I certainly would be honored and it would be meaningful to me to visit those two cities in the future.  I don't have immediate travel plans, ah, but it's something that, ah, would be meaningful to me...."  [This set of words was part of an answer to a complex-question or multi-question, a part of which wondered if Barack Obama thought the atomic-bomb attacks on Japan at the end of World War II were justified, and he avoided giving an answer, and a followup question tried to get Barack Obama to give an answer about whether he thought the atomic-bomb attacks were justified, and, in essence, he brushed aside the second attempt to get him to answer.]

    Tuesday, November 17, 2009 (in China):
    "...It's very important for the United States not to assume that what is good for us is automatically good for somebody else.  We have to have some modesty about our attitudes toward other countries.  We think it's important nevertheless to be true to our ideals and our values.  And we, when we do so, though, we will always do so with the humility and understanding we are not perfect and that we still have much progress to make.  Ah, if you talk to women in America, they will tell you that there are still men who have a lot of old-fashioned ideas about the role of women in society...."  [Barack Obama made this statement to students at a university.  First, Barack Obama put down the United States of America in another country again.  Second, the women in China really know not what freedom American women have--American women are not oppressed, especially not oppressed as women are in some Islam-based societies of the Middle East--and the women in China have no reference point about how women are treated in America, but they do have their experiences about how women are treated in China, and that means, through Barack Obama's speech, the women in China might think most women in America live in some type of oppression.  Third, what did Barack Obama mean by the words "old-fashioned ideas"?  Barack Obama did not say what the old-fashioned ideas were, so listeners could come up with their own conclusions, which would mostly likely be false.]

    Wednesday, November 18, 2009 (speaking to Fox News):
    "...There may be some, ah, tax provisions that can encourage businesses to hire sooner rather than sitting on the sidelines, so we're taking a look at those.  Ah, I, I think it is important , though, to recognize that, if we keep on adding to the debt, even in the midst of this recovery, that some point, ah, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession...."  [I see that Barack Obama was and is a trying to state that, if a double-dip recession occurs, it will have been the "people" who were the cause, because they lost confidence in the U.S. economy.  Barack Obama lied again, since the economy is not improving, as this document shows in some recent entries.  Barack Obama has caused the big debt, and Barack Obama yet wants to--it appears to me--pass super-big bills that will add much, much more to the debt., and some of those bills are a national-health-care bill and a cap-and-trade bill.  What a collage of nonsense that Barack Obama spouted.]

    Monday, November 23, 2009 (at the launching of the Educate to Innovate campaign):
    "...We live in a world of unprecedented perils but also unparalleled potential.  Our medical system holds the promise of unlocking new cures, but it's attached to a health-care system that's bankrupting families and businesses and our government.  The sources of energy that power our economy are also endangering our planet...."  [Over the previous four days or so, the big story was that a hacker had captured about 1,000 emails and more than 2,000 other electronic documents related to the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University, Norwich, the United Kingdom, and posted them on a server in Russia, and the documents show evidence that main pro-manmade-global-warming scientists have been working to put down the thoughts of skeptics to the manmade-global-warming idea and lying about manmade global warming.  Again, Barack Obama showed that he is probably a liar--probably well aware he knows manmade global warming is a hoax.  (Johnson, Keith, and Jeffrey Ball.  "Climate Emails Stoke Debate."  The Wall Street Journal, 22 November 2009.  (http://www.wsj.com....); Eilperin, Juliet.  "Hackers steal electronic date from top climate research center." The Washington Post, 21 November 2009.  (http://www.washingtonpost.com....); Hickman, Leo, and James Randerson.  "Climate sceptics claim leaked emails are evidence of collusion among scientists."  The Guardian (The U.K.), 20 November 2009, 18:5 GMT.  (http://www.guardian.com....))]

    Tuesday, December 1, 2009 (a Presidential Address to the Nation at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York):
    "...When I took office, we had just over 32,000 Americans serving in Afghanistan, compared to 160,000 in Iraq at the peak of the war.  Commanders in Afghanistan repeated asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive, and that's why shortly after taking office, I approved a long-standing request for more troops...."  [U.S. General Stanley McChrystal asked for reinforcements in August 2009, and it was not till now that Barack Obama gave his agreement for more troops.]
    "...This review is now complete.  As Commander-in-Chief, I have determined that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan.  After eighteen months, our troops will begin to come home...."  [U.S. General Stanley McChrystal had asked for a number of troops in a range of from 80,000 to 40,000 troops, the latter of which was the stated minimum, and so Barack Obama chose to give the expert--U.S. General Stanley McChrystal--less than the minimum asked for, and Barack Obama gave the rough date on which troops would start to leave Afghanistan, giving the enemy, for example, an idea of how they could back off a bit till the U.S. troops were gone.]
    "...Years of debate over Iraq and terrorism have left our unity on national security issues in tatters and created a highly polarized and partisan backdrop for descent...."  [Here, I say, "So what!"  Since Barack Obama is a dangerous man, I want descent against him and work to block him and his policies.]
    "...First, we will pursue a military strategy that will break the Taliban's momentum and increase Afghanistan's capacity over the next eighteen months.  The 30,000 additional troops that I'm announcing tonight will deploy in the first part of 2010, the fastest possible pace, so that they can target the insurgency and secure key population centers...."  [Yes, Barack Obama stalled for about three months in making a decision about the number of troops, and, now, we learned that Barack Obama is going to rush, rush, rush to get the extra troops on the battlefield--next year, sometime.]
    "...Finally, there are those who oppose identifying a time frame for our transition to Afghan responsibility.  Indeed, some call for a more dramatic and open-ended escalation of our war effort, one that would commit us to a nation-building project of up to a decade.  I reject this course, because it sets goals that are beyond what can be achieved at a reasonable cost and what we need to achieve to secure our interests...."  [What does Barack Obama think is a reasonable cost, given that he has worked on or is working on domestic policies that are adding trillions of dollars to the debt of the country?]
    "...Our new approach in Afghanistan is likely to cost us roughly 30-billion dollars for the military this year, and I'll work closely with Congress to address these costs as we work to bring down our deficit...."   [Barack Obama lied again, since Barack Obama has done nothing yet or has proposed nothing yet to reduce the deficit in any meaningful amount, and, in fact, Barack Obama has increased the debt three or four times over that of George W Bush's.]
    "...Now let me be clear.  None of this will be easy.  The struggle against violent extremism will not be finished quick, and it extends well beyond Afghanistan and Pakistan...."  [Yes, Barack Obama did say that the work "will not be finished quick," yet Barack Obama did set a time table for the U.S. to get out of Afghanistan.]
    "...This vast and diverse citizenry will not always agree on every issue or should we.  But I also know we as a country cannot sustain our leadership nor navigate the momentous challenges of our time if we allow ourselves to be split asunder by the same rancor and cynicism and partisanship that has in recent times poisoned our national discourse...."  [This boring and laborious speech for the audience--and maybe for Barack Obama--is trying to promote to the American public that the American public should not rebel against him and should follow him.]

    Thursday, December 3, 2009 (a "Jobs Summit" in Washington, D.C.):
    "...Despite the progress we've made, many businesses are still skittish about hiring.  Some are still digging themselves out of loses they incurred over the past year.  Many have figured out how to squeeze more productivity out of fewer workers.  And that cost cutting has become embedded in their operations and in their culture.  That may result in good profits, but it's not translating into hiring, and so that's the question that we have to ask ourselves today--'How do we get businesses to start hiring again?'...."  [Here, Barack Obama attacked every business person in the country.  Barack Obama said that business owners are purposely not hiring so that they can avoid using profits to pay workers, and Barack Obama said that businesses are forcing their workers to work harder.  Barack Obama is spurring on hatred through lies, because, for one, business owners are not hiring because they know how communists and the like hate private business and work to hurt private businesses through taxes, and, today, business owners know Barack Obama is proposing taxes that will take away more money that businesses have taken in from customers--called revenues--that can be used to hire and hold on to employees or stay in businesss!]
    "...I want to be clear.  While I believe that government has a critical role in creating the conditions for economic growth, ultimately, true economic recovery is only going to come from the private sector.  We don't have enough public dollars to fill the hole of private dollars that was created as a consequence of the crisis...." [This set of words can be hard to understand; that is, a person cannot really understand what is meant, especially the portion "enough public dollars to fill the hole of private dollar that was created as a consequence of the crisis."   The government gets its "public dollars" from the private section--especially taxes on businesses and taxes on individuals.  However, the federal government can indiscriminately print "dollars" and press out coins continually moment upon moment.  When a government simply prints money or press out money continually, going beyond, for instance, the process of replacing worn-out money (bills and such), it creates inflation or hyper-inflation, which is bad, since the value of a particular piece of money loses value or buying power.  Remember: The "crisis" was caused by the federal government and government-related entities, especially Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae.  What is the "hole" to be filled?  Is it a hole that had money that businesses used to pay employees?  Can you clearly understand what Barack Obama said.]
    "...I need everybody here to bring their 'A' game here today.  I, I'm going to be asking some tough questions.  I will be listening for some good answers.  And I don't want to just brainstorm at thirty-thousand feet, I want details, ah, in our discussion today.  I'm looking for specific recommendations that can be implemented that will spur on job growth as quickly as possible.  I want to be clear, ah, we won't overcome our unemployment challenge in just a few hours this afternoon, ah, I assure you there is extraordinary skepticism that, ah, any discussions like this could actually produce results.  I'm well aware of that.  Ah, I don't mind skepticism.  If I listened to the skeptics, I wouldn't be here.  But I am confident that we'll make progress...."  [Many media people associated with such entities as CNN, NBC News, MSNBC, and PBS have noted that Barack Obama is a genius or brilliant or very smart.  Given that knowledge, a person should ask--Why did Barack Obama have to hold a "job summit?"  Since businesses have been operating in the country since the 1700s, millions of people in the country should know how to create jobs, and, certainly, one way is to make profits so that more workers can be hired and so that businesses can try to grow, if they wish to grow (not all business people want their businesses to grow to be the biggest business in the world), and another way in which a business can end up hiring more people is when more citizens in the community ask for what the business has and the business has money by which to hire more people (if more citizens do not ask for what the business has, because the government has taken more taxes from them so that they have less to spend, the business cannot expand and hire more employees.]

    [Note: Bob Schieffer of Face the Nation, a weekly show on CBS-TV, made several comments on the air during a discussion show after Barack Obama spoke on Tuesday, December 1, 2009.  On comment that he made was: "...The President always makes a very eloquent speech, but we'll look back on this and say, 'This was the defining moment of the Obama presidency.  This was the night when Barack Obama took full ownership of the war in Afghanistan.'  What the comment on this speech is going to be all about is 'Is the tragedy itself--how do you on the one hand say, "We need to send these troops over there, it's critical, this is in our national security interest to do this", but then say, ah,  "But we're only going to keep them there for eighteen months, we're gonna to start to withdraw them."?'  I just don't understand, ah, the logic of how that works...."   Another comment, Bob Schieffer made was: "...I don't understand how you can set a deadline.  This is not a football game where there's a clock, where the time runs out.  To win this war, you have to defeat the enemy.  How can you say in the beginning, ah, that we're going to do that, when, when we don't know what's going to happen?"  I note these comments, knowing that, generally speaking, Bob Schieffer and other main media types support all the Barack Obama, who is a communist, does, but this time, Bob Schieffer does make a useful comment.]

    Tuesday, December 7, 2009 (at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.):
    "...One of the central goals of this administration is restoring fiscal responsibility.  The deficit had been building dramatically over the precious eight years.  Folks passed tax cuts and expansive entitlement programs without paying for any of it, even as health-care costs kept rising year after year.  These budget-busting tax cuts and spending programs were approved by many of the same people who are now waxing political about fiscal responsibility while opposing our efforts to reduce deficits by getting health-care costs under control...."    [Well, let me see.  Barack Obama in the past year or so--roughly his first year as the President--has tripled the deficit of the country.  Now, notice the idea of "budget-busting tax cuts" in his statement.  To him, income tax cuts are "budget-busters," and the statement hints to the idea that Barack Obama does not like income tax cuts because the government loses money, and the statement also shows that he thinks a government should not cut back on spending, but people should pay more.  Barack Obama is attacking the income tax cuts that were enacted during the U.S. President George W. Bush administration, and the time period for those tax cuts are going to run out soon, and Barack Obama hinted through this statement that he is not going to renew them, which means everyone gets an income tax increase soon.]
    "...Our economy is growing for the first time in a year.  In the swing from contraction to expansion, since the beginning of the year, is the largest in three decades...."  [The statement is a lie, since there has been no real big expansion of the private sector.]
    "...Finally, we're no longer seeing the severe deterioration in the job market that we once were.  In fact, we learned on Friday that the unemployment rate fell slightly last month...."  [Barack Obama said that there was no "severe deterioration in the job market," but Barack Obama said that "unemployment fell slightly last month.  Last month was November, when many stores picked up part-time employees (or "seasonal workers") for the holiday period, which runs from about Thanksgiving to Christmas.  How many long-term jobs were opened up and filled has yet to be determined.]
    "...This is welcome news, and news made possible in part by the up to 1.6 million jobs that the Recovery Act has already created and saved according to the Congressional Budget Office...."  [Barack Obama lied.  Ask yourself--How did Barack Obama determine that he saved any jobs?  Did Barack Obama make a survey of every business in the country to prove that jobs were saved?  The country has millions and millions of employers.  He could not and did not make a survey.   How can you determine what a "save job" is and how many jobs were "saved"?]
    "...We held a jobs forum at the White House that brought together small-business owners, CEOs, union members, economists, folks from non-profits, and state and local officials to talk about job creation.  And I've asked people to lead forums in their own communities, sending the results to me, so we are hearing as many voices as possible as we refine our proposals.  We've already heard a number of good ideas, and I know we'll learn of many more...."  [I have not heard of anyone being asked to hold local forums where I have been or have no heard about anyone running local forums about how to create jobs.  Businesses create jobs as they have for decades and centuries--they create jobs when people are needed to create more products or offer services or when businesses have money taken in from customers that allow businesses to create more jobs.  Anyway, people are too busy working to hold forums in their communities and too busy doing other things to hold forums.  Such "forums" are a waste of time, especially given the fact that Barack Obama has shown himself to be a man who does not listen to anyone who promotes capitalism in the country.  His statement was more flap doodle.]
    "...Launched hastily under the last administration, the TARP program was flawed, and we have worked hard to correct those flaws and manage it properly.  TARP is expected cost the taxpayers at least two-hundred-billion dollars less than what was anticipated just this past summer, and the assistance to banks once thought to cost taxpayers untold billions is on track to actually reap billions in profits for the tax-paying public...."  [I see many problems with this statement, and I hope you see them, since I will not point them all out.  I do note that I am sitting patiently for the "profit" check from Barack Obama.  Maybe, it will come tomorrow.  Maybe, it will come the next day.  Maybe, it will come next week.  Maybe, it will come next month.  Oh, well.]
    "...Even before this particular crisis, much of our growth had been fueled by unattainable consumer debt and reckless financial speculation.  But we ignored the fundamental challenges that hold the key to our economic prosperity.  We cannot simply go back to the way things used to be.  We can't go back to an economy that yielded cycle after cycle of speculative booms and painful busts...."  [Businesses cycles have occurred for decades--there are booms, such as when new products (like personal computers) become available, and there are busts, such as when the federal government adversely affects the marketplace, such as by setting up laws that force companies to pay more taxes or to give housing loans to people who will very likely not pay them back.]
    "...Now, every night, I read letters and emails sent to me from people across America.  The toughest letters are in children's handwriting, kids who can't just be kids because they're worried about moms having their hours cut or dad losing their job or a family without health insurance.  These folks aren't looking for a handout.  They're not looking for a bailout.  All they're looking for is a chance to make their own way, to work, to succeed, using their talents and skills.  And they're looking for folks in Washington to have a seriousness of purpose that matches the reality of their struggle...."  [I note that all the quotations and statements offered in this document can be found in audio form, such as through the Internet.  Of all the statements and quotations presented in this document, this piece is the hardest to show fully for the rottenness that it is without presenting it in audio form.  You have to hear the tone of Barack Obama's voice as he says it.  The statement made me gag when I first heard it.  Yet, even without hearing it, you should understand--Such garbage this man, Barack Obama, is!]

    [Note: On Thursday, December 10, 2009, Barack Obama was in Oslo, Norway, to get a peace prize--that Nobel thing--and he made a speech.  So what!  I decided to skip the nonsense of the day.  You will not miss what he said.]

    Tuesday, December 15, 2009 (another speech about health care):
    "...We just had a very productive session about the final stages of health-care reform in the Senate, and from the discussions we had, it's clear that we are on the precipice of an achievement that has eluded Congresses and presidents for generations, an achievement that will touch the lives of nearly every American.  There are still some differences that have to be worked on.  Ah, this is not a role call.  Ah, this was a broad-based discussion about how we move forward...."  (I could attack much of this, but I will only look at some pieces.  Barack Obama said that he is going to give health care to all Americans, so why did he say "nearly all" in the first sentence?  Well, I guess he had heard that none of the bills that have been in the U.S. Congress cover everyone.  Next, I say--What is "broad-based" to him?  It is U.S. Senator Harry Reid, who is the head of the majority party in the U.S. Senate--which is the Democratic Party--who sets the general agenda about how a bill goes through the U.S. Senate, and, certainly, Republicans have no input now.  You should look at a big dictionary, such as Webster's Third New International Dictionary, to see what "reform" and "precipice" can mean.  I wonder if reform means to Barack Obama to "...cause to abandon an evil manner of living...." as is noted in Webster's Third New International Dictionary as one definition, and I wonder if "precipice" to Barack Obama means "...on the brink of disaster....", resulting in this thought--We are on the brink of disaster of an achievement that has eluded....]
    "...This plan will strengthen Medicare and extend the life of that program...."  [Since Barack Obama has been shown to be a perpetual liar, he cannot be believed here, especially since it can be shown that about $500 billion is going to be cut from the Medicare program if the national-health-care bill is passed--it is in the bill.]
    "...Whatever ideas are, ah, whatever ideas exist in terms of bending the cost curve and starting to reduce costs for families, businesses, and government, those elements are in this bill...."  [There are no "elements" that reduce the costs or "bend" the cost curve in the ways that should be done, such by having tort reform provisions.  Barack Obama lied again.  The national-health-care bill is billions, billions and and billions and billions....  Oh, yes, the bill is going to cut back on Medicare.]
    "...These aren't small changes.  These are big changes.  They represent the most significant reform of our health-care system since the passage of Medicare...."   [What did Barack Obama mean by "reform" in this sentence.]
    "...Now, a lot of the critics of this entire process fail to note what happens if nothing gets done, and the American people have to be very clear about this.  If we don't get this done, your premiums are guaranteed to go up.  If this does not get done, more employers are going to drop coverage because they can't afford it.  If this does not get done, it is guaranteed that Medicare and Medicaid will blow a hole through our budget.  Those things are guaranteed...."  [Okay, in life and time, the prices of things go up.  If you see my document called Michigan Travel Tips #67, which can be reached at this Travel #67 link, you will see evidence about a man named Don Weber, and it shows that he spent about 35 cents for a breakfast, a lunch, and a dinner in November 1922, and, today, it a breakfast or a lunch or a dinner can cost more than a few dollars (get a $2.99 special), and so goes inflation over time.  Recently, the prices have been going up because, for one, big court cases have given out big rewards in malpractice cases.  In addition, because of malpractice cases, doctors have had to take up practicing defensive medicine, in which they do extra tests so that they cannot be sued for maybe not doing--in the eyes of judges and jurors, looking in hindsight--something.  I say that, sometimes, it is better to do nothing than to do what is bad or wrong!]
    "...I am absolutely confident that if the American people knows what's in this bill and if the Senate knows what's in this bill that this is going to pass...."  [Note: Around this time, numerous surveys showed the Americans do not want the national-health-care system that is being proposed.]

    Wednesday, December 16, 2009 (on World News with Charles Gibson):
    "...If we don't pass it, here's the guarantee that--the people who are watching tonight--your premiums will go up, your employers are gonna to bloat up more costs on you, potentially they're gonna drop you coverage 'cause they just can't afford an increase of 25, 30 percent in terms of the cost of providing health care to employees each an every year, and the federal government will go bankrupt, because Medicare and Medicaid are on a trajectory that are unsustainable, and this actually provides us the best chance of starting to bend the cost curve on the government expenditures of Medicare and Medicaid...."  [The topic was the health-care bill, which was in the U.S. Senate.  Barack Obama used scare tactics here and passed on lies.  First, Barack Obama did not note when prices would go up 25 percent or 30 percent.  Will that happen in fifty years or one-hundred years?  You should see the previous entry (December 15, 2009) for my talk about inflation.  Notice how Barack Obama was worried about the federal government going bankrupt, but, on December 17, 2009, at the Climate Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, U.S. Secretary Hillary Clinton made a statement that the Barack Obama administration was willing to provide to the climate-change fund up to $1,000 billion (or one-trillion dollars) by 2020.  And the country is already bankrupt, and because of all the great amount of spending that the Barack Obama administration has done since January 20, 2009, a big change inflation is very likely to happen soon, and it will not be good!]
    "...The opposition party, ah, has made a political decision that we are going to say 'no' to everything.  We're gonna not be at the table.  We're gonna just not get involved...."  [The Democrats in the US. Congress have for the most part kept Republicans out of the process of crafting federal bills, such as all the health-care bills that have been made public, and, in fact, the Democrats in the U.S. Congress have crafted bills behind closed doors.]

    Thursday, December 18, 2009 (at the U.N. Climate Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark):
    "...We come here in Copenhagen, because climate change poses a great and growing danger to our people.  All of you would not be here unless you like me were convinced that this danger is real.  This is not fiction; it is science.  Unchecked, climate change will pose unacceptable risks to our security, our economies, and our planet.  This much we know...."  [Barack Obama keeps pushing the climate-change lie, despite the evidence that has showed up to prove the lie--the Climate-gate scandal--and, by the way, on the previous day, four inches of snow had fallen at Copenhagen (it is rare when there is that amount of snow at Copenhagen).]
    "...The question then before us is no longer the nature of the challenge, the question is our capacity to meet it.  For while the reality of climate change is not in doubt, I have to be honest, as the world watches us today, I think our ability to take collective action is in doubt right now, and it hangs in the balance.  I believe we can act boldly and decisively in the face of a common threat.  That's why I come here today--not to talk but to act...."  [Barack Obama did more lip flapping!]
    "...We know the fault lines, because we've been imprisoned by them for years.  These international discussions have essentially taken place for almost two decades, and we have very little to show for it other than an increase acceleration of the climate-change phenomenon...."  [I am glad nothing has been done, because it is good for the good people of the world.]
    "...The time for talk is over...."  [And I say, "Then, shut up, Baracky Obamee!   Don't think that I am not keeping score, Baracky Obamee!"]

    Monday, December 21, 2009 (a press conference about the health-care bill):
    "...The Congressional Budget Office now reports that this bill will reduce our deficit by a hundred-and-thirty-two-billion dollars over the first decade and by as much as one-point-three-trillion dollars in the decade after that.  So, I just want to be clear for all those who are, ah, continually carping about how this is somehow a big spending government bill.  This cuts our deficit by hundred-and-thirty-two-billion dollars the first ten years and by over a trillion in the second.  That argument that opponents are making against this bill does not hold water...."  [Remember this lie!]
    "...When my administration walked through the door, the country faced a growing economic downturn as well as a deepening fiscal hole.  Washington had passed massive tax cuts for the wealthy and an expensive new entitlement program without paying for any of it.  Health-care costs continued to rise year after year, and little effort was made to cut wasteful spending.  As a result, over the previous eight years, the nek, the national debt doubled--doubled.  As I've said, in the long run, we can't continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if waste doesn't matter, as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money.  That's what we've seen time and time again...." [And that is yet more crap from the mind of Barack Obama.]

    [Note: On Thursday, January  7, 2010, Barack Obama spoke to the nation in the afternoon about national security; on December 25, 2009, there had been an attempted bombing of an airliner over the Detroit area of Michigan.]

    Friday, January 8, 2010 (a press conference):
    "...The jobs numbers that were released by the Labor Department this morning are a reminder that the road to recovery is never straight, and that we have to continue to work every single day to get our economy moving again.  For most Americans and for me, that means jobs.  It means whether we are putting people back to work.  And jobs loses for the last quarter of 2009 were one-tenth of what we were experiencing in the first quarter.  In fact, in November, we saw the first gain in jobs in nearly two year.  Ah, last month, however, we slipped back, losing more jobs than we gained, though the overall trend of job loss is still pointing in the right direction...."  [Keep this statement in mind, and let us see what happens in reality in the months to come.]

    Wednesday, January 13, 2010 (a press conference):
    "...I have directed my administration to respond with a swift, coordinated, and aggressive effort to save lives.  The people of Haiti will have the full support of the United States in the urge effort to rescue those trapped beneath the rubble and to deliver the humanitarian relief, the food, water, and medicine that Haitians will need in the coming days...."  [This statement was made about twenty-four hours after a really big earthquake hit Haiti, and I say that he got a real "crisis," which he can now exploit, showing himself as a compassionate leader and a savior.]

    Thursday, January 14, 2010 (a press conference):
    "...Banks owe their continued existence to the American people.  Folks who have not been made whole and who continue to face real hardship in this recession.  We want our money back!  And we're gonna get it!  And that's why I'm proposing a Financial Responsibility Fee to be imposed on major financial firms until the American people are fully compensated for the extraordinary assistance they provided to Wall Street...."  [Notice how he wants you to think all the banks in the country owe their existence to the American people, and that is nonsense, since many banks did not need TARP money, such as many, many local banks.  Now, here we go.  In 2008, some big banking firms were forced to take TARP money, even when they said that they did not need it and did not want it.  Financial firms have paid back or paid back much of the money from TARP.  Remember: The underlying problem with the financial crisis that really hit home in 2008 was caused by the federal government, as I show in my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, which can be reached by using this Logic link.  If you look on the Internet, you will find stories that note when financial institutions paid back TARP money, but I do not list the stories here.  By the way, I heard anger in Barack Obama's voice, but I could not portray that anger through the text, of course.  (Walsh, Fiona.  "How Paulson forced bail-out on the banks."  The Guardian (the United Kingdom), 15 October 2008, 07:37 BST; Weisanthal, Joe.  "Documents Reveal How Paulson Forced Banks to Take TARP Cash."  The Business Insider, 13 May 2009, 8:25 p.m.)]
    "...Our goal is not to punish Wall Street firms, but rather to prevent the abuse and excess that nearly caused the collapse of many of these firms in the financial system itself.  We cannot go back to business as usual, and when we see reports of firms once again engaging in risky bets to reap quick rewards, when we see a return to compensation practices that seem not to reflect what the country's been through, all that looks like business as usual to me...."  [Here, Barack Obama ran through more cliché talk and lies, and you should see Barack Obama is trying to make you think the enemy is the financial industry and he is going to save the day on your behalf.]
    "...We're already hearing the human cry from Wall Street suggesting that this proposed fee is not only unwelcome but unfair, that by some twisted logic it is more appropriate for the American people to bare the cost of the bailout, rather than the industry that benefited from it, even though these executives are out there givin' themselves huge bonuses.  What I'd say to these executives is this--Instead of sending a phalanx of lobbyists to fight this proposal or employing an army of lawyers and accountants to help evade the fee, I suggest you might want to consider meeting your responsibility...."  [Barack Obama spoke--the thug spoke.  Do you hear the tactics of a thug should in the three sets of quoted material?  You should!  Do you hear his attempt to coerce bankers and such?  You should!  And do you hear the tactics of a communist and a Marxist and, really, a Fascist who wants to control the banking business?  I hope you do!  Barack Obama showed again he is dangerous for the country.]

    Sunday, January 17, 2010 (on the campaign trail for a Democratic U.S. Senate candidate (Martha Coakey) in Boston, Massachusetts):
    "...I've heard about some of the ads that, dah, Martha's opponent's running.  He's drivin' his truck around the commonwealth.  Ah, and, dah, and he says that he'll, you know, that he gets ya, that he fights for ya, that he'll be an independent voice.  And, he, he, I don't know him, he may be a perfectly nice guy.  I, I don't know his record.  Ah, but, I, I, I, I don't know whether he's been fightin' for you up until now...."  [This set of words from Barack Obama came not from a script on a teleprompter.  Go back and read the words aloud.  Notice the sentence pattern.  Notice how the speech is sloppy, and some of the words were not pronounced fully or correctly, and you should see the stuttering he did.  In jest, I say, "Does he not sound as if he were a true genius?]

    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 (interviewed by George Stephanopoulos of Good Morning America of ABC-TV):
    "...The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office.  People are angry and and they're frustrated, not just because what's happened in the last year or two years but what's happened over the last eight years...."  [On Tuesday, January 19, 2010, a man named Scott Brown, who was calling himself a Republican and had announced that he would not vote for the health-care bill being debated in the U.S. Senate, was elected to be a U.S. Senator related to Massachusetts, taking up the seat that had been held by Edward Kennedy, and this was a statement that Barack Obama made about the election.  Scott Brown won because he had run as a man who was opposed to what Barack Obama and high-ranking Democrats in the U.S. Congress were trying to push on the country, and that is fact.  Yet, notice how Barack Obama tried to suggest that people were angry because of former U.S. President George W. Bush.]

    Friday, January 22, 2010 (at a town-hall meeting in Elyria, Ohio):
    "...I walked into office a year ago, in the middle of a raging economic storm that was wrecking devastation on your town and communities everywhere.  We had to take some very difficult steps to deal with that mess, to stave off an even greater economic catastrophe.  We had to stabilize the financial system, which, given the role of the big banks in creating this mess, was a pretty tough pill to swallow.  I knew it would be unpopular and rightly so.  But I also knew that we had to do it because, if they went down, your local banks would have gone down, and, if the financial system went down, it would have taken the entire economy and millions more families and businesses with it.  So we would have been looking at a second Great Depression...."   [Notice how Barack Obama lied by saying that the big banks caused the mess, but Barack Obama did not talk about how Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were instrumental in the creating the mess.  Notice how Barack Obama gave no proof that the financial system of the country was surely going to crash, and Barack Obama never has.  Notice how Barack Obama put out the biggest possible scenario of catastrophe so that he could make you think he is justified in doing what he has done and is doing.]
    "...I want to make this absolutely clear.  I did not run for president to turn away from these challenges.  I didn't run to kick these challenges down the road.  I ran to confront them once and for all.  I ran for this office to rebuild our economy so it works not just for the fortunate few but for everybody who's willing to work hard...."  [This set of sentences shows three big problems with Barack Obama.  First, the town-hall meeting was supposed to be about "jobs," but he talked a lot about himself.  Second, for decades and decades and decades, the economy of this country has worked for most people--it has not worked for only a "few," as Barack Obama suggested--so Barack Obama passed along crap.  In fact, I ask, "Who are the "few" that Barack Obama is talking about?  Look around!  Most people have jobs and can pay bills.  There are houses all over the place, and there are cars all over the place, and there are businesses all over the place.  Anyway, in Barack Obama's mind, what is considered the proper "working" state for the economy, and what form would he change it into?]
    "...I want you to understand.  This is not about me!"  There was crowd noise.  "This is not about me!  This is about you!  This is not about me, this is about you!  I didn't take this up to boost my poll numbers.  You know the way to boost your poll numbers is not do anything.  That's how you do it!  You don't offend anybody!  I'd have real high poll numbers!  All of Washington would be saying, 'What a genius.'..."  [I say in jest, "The genius has talked about himself again."]
    "...So long as I have, ah, some breath in me, so long as I have the privilege of serving as your President, I will not stop fighting for you.  I will take my lumps.  But I won't stop fighting to bring back jobs here.  I won't stop fighting for an economy where hard work is rewarded.  I won't stop fighting to make sure there's accountability in our financial system.  I'm not going to stop fighting until we have jobs for everybody...."  [Does this not sound as if Barack Obama is at a union meeting and is trying to rally dumb workers, people who would be taken in by such nonsense?  I can almost see the scene of a movie here--maybe one with Sylvester Stallone around by a bunch of guys with shovels held high in the air.  Then, I note that there has been accountability in the financial system for decades and decades and decades--(1) operators of companies get fired for doing poorly, (2) companies have to follow state laws and federal laws related to many subjects, such as accounting practices, (3) companies that issue stock have stockholders who can vote on policies, (4) stockholders of companies that have stockholders can press to have executives fired, et cetera.  Also, it is impossible for everyone in a country to be employed, because, for example, people change jobs and businesses have hard times, especially the hard times caused by government, such as an increase in taxes.]
    "...We're having a fight right now, 'cause I want to charge Wall Street a modest fee to repay taxpayers in full for saving their skins in a time of need.  We want our money back!  We want our money back!  And we're going get your money back, every dime, each and every dime!..."  [For the most part, companies--banks, for example--that took TARP money or were forced to take TARP money have paid back the money and interest on the money, so what is the reason for the "modest fee" that Barack Obama wants to charge them?  What is a "modest fee" in Barack Obama's mind?  If a modest fee is charged banks, that can mean the banks will have less revenue with which to use to pay as interest on savings accounts or money market accounts, so Barack Obama is hurting investors in banks, such as, maybe, you, but that is the way of the Marxist or the communist!  Oh, if Barack Obama gets the money back, how and when is he going to get your share to you?]
    "...Now, I'm not going to walk away just because it's hard.  We are going to keep on working to get this done with Democrats--I hope with Republicans--anybody who is willing to step up...."  [Here, Barack Obama was talking about his hoped-for a national-health-care system, and Barack Obama was sending out a message something like--Come on and step up and join my communism/Marxism push, and yes, be willing to join by communism/Marxism push and be thought of as a person who was willing to step up.]
    "...We just went through a decade where we were told that it didn't matter--we'll just, you, you just keep on importing, buying stuff from other countries, you just take out a home-equitity loan and max out your credit card, and everything's going to be Okay, and it looked for a lot of people like--'Well, the economy seems to be growin'--but it was all built on a house of cards.  That's what we now know...."  [I will let you examine this piece of whatever for yourself.]

    Monday, January 25, 2010:
    "...Now, we all know what that American Dream is.  It's the idea that, in America, we can make our lives what we will.  It's the idea that, if you work hard can live up to your responsibilities, you can get ahead and enjoy some of the basic guarantees in life--a good job that pays a good wage, health care that will be there when you get sick, a secure retirement, even if  you're not rich, an education that will give our kids a better life than we had...."  [There is not much that I can say about this set of sentences, but I have to say that I think Barack Obama simply said this as filler material, what he might consider a collection of clichés.  Oh, I wonder if Barack Obama is aware that Americans who pursue the American Dream, except for some people employed in government, do not do that by looking for government to provide the American Dream.  However, I can argue well that Barack Obama seeks his American Dream, which I think is a distorted American Dream, through the federal government by making an oppression federal government.]
    "...Unfortunately, the middle class has been under assault for a long time.  Too many Americans have known their own painful recessions, long before any economists declared that were was a recession.  We've just come through what was one of most difficult decades the middle class has ever faced, a decade in which median income fell and our economy lost about as many jobs as it gained...."  [Haiti, Cuba, and Saudi Arabia are only a few of the many countries--bad countries--in the world that are set up as societies truly made up of "classes"--(1) the rich rulers and (2) all others, who are often basically poor.  The United States of America is not a country in which people are born in a certain level of society and stay there.  In addition, I ask, "Who does Barack Obama think is the middle class in the United States of America?"  For example, people do all types of jobs, and people can take up completely new types of work from one day to the next, and sons and daughters are not locked into taking up the types of jobs held by their parents, and, yet, today, people in the United States of America are able remove from office people who they think are bad politicians, who then can be considered no longer in what Barack Obama might call the "ruling class."   And Barack Obama lied--there has not been a ten-year-long recession in the country, but there has been at least a several-year-long recession in Michigan.]
    "...Creating good sustainable jobs is the single most important thing we can do to rebuild the middle class, and I won't rest until we're doing just that.  But we also need to reverse the overall erosion in middle-class security so that when this economy does come back, working Americans are free to purpose their dreams again...." [This set of sentences has a bunch of problems.  A government cannot create sustainable jobs, except, maybe, government jobs, but even in that case, a person can be fired (one way in which could be for having the wrong political affiliation).  No one can guarantee any job will last!  The world changes, and jobs can disappear (for example, one is making the Underwood TM-Five typewriter anymore, and no one is making the car known as the Packard, and no on is making tube checkers for home use, and on one is making 8088 IBM computers).  Jobs can last for years and years, though.  How do you reverse erosion before the economy picks up?     Who are the "we" that he talked about?  He was probably thinking of "me."   And Americans are not waiting for the economy to improve before they begin to pursue their dreams again, since people are always pursuing their dreams.]
    "...Hopefully some of these steps will re-establish some of the security that's slipped away in recent years, because, in the end, that's how Joe [Vice President Joseph Biden] and I measure progress, not by how the markets are doing but by how the American people are doing.  It's about whether they see some progress in their own lives.  So we're gonna keep fighting to rebuild our economy so that hard work is once again rewarded, wages and incomes are once again rising, and the middle class is once again growing...." [Try these thoughts.  I say in jest, "Yes, sometime back, the idea that people do not get rewarded for working hard became commonplace, and, now, in America, people are no longer rewarded for working hard."  You might ask, based on what Barack Obama said: "How can Barack Obama guarantee your hard work will be rewarded?"  I can prove the federal government is hurting the economy and the private sector, and since the federal government is hurting the economy and the private sector, you should see Barack Obama's "fight to rebuild our economy" does not mean he is going to fight to improve the economy but fight to "rebuild" it into what it has never been, such as a Marxist-based economic system, in which the government controls or owns everything.]

    Wednesdsay, January 27, 2010 (a State of the Union speech, give in the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives):
    "...For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough.  Some are frustrated.  Some are angry.  They don't understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded but hard work on Main Street isn't or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems.  They're tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness...."  [This set of words was one of the early sets of words spoken by Barack Obama this night, and it is the first of thirty-three sets of words that show evidence of how Barack Obama lies, how Barack Obama attacks America, such as the U.S. Supreme Court, et cetera.  I could have put in more than thirty-three sets of words, but there comes a time when a person has to say, "That is enough garbage to go through."  So, what does this first set of words show?  It shows, for one, another attack on Wall Street and the business community of the country.  It also shows Barack Obama's attempt to say that people on Main Street do not get rewarded for their hard work, and that is a lie.]
    "...And what the American people hope, what they deserve is for all of us--Democrats and Republicans--to work through our differences, to overcome the weight of our politics...."  [Today, the Democratic Party is filled with and run by Marxists, hard-left socialists, and communists, such as Barack Obama, and if people, such as the conservatives in the Republican Party, do not fight against the Democrats, the country will be hurt for decades to come through the political ideologies, such as communism, that have hurt millions of people all over the world and that the Democrats want to install in this country.]
    "...In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency, that embodies their strength...."  ["Decency"--keep this word in mind.  See my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which shows the quality of the people whom Barack Obama has surrounded himself with and does surround himself with, and some of those people are tax cheats and sexual deviants.  Yet, Barack Obama brought out the idea of decency.  To see the document that I have referred to, use this link: Crud.]
    "...Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis.  It was not easy to do.  And if there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans and everybody in between is that we all hated the bank bailout.  I hated it.  I hated it.  I hated it.  You hated it.  It was about a popular as a root canal...."  [Barack Obama got a laugh with this statement.  Let me make note about a root canal, which may be or is probably unknown to Barack Obama.  A root canal is only difficult for a patient when the tooth that is being worked on is already infected and there is pain.  I had a root canal done, and it was not painful, and, by the way, a portion of the tiny drill broke off during the procedure, and it yet remains in the tooth.  The joke did not work well with me, and one reason for that is I know the banks were not the root cause of the economic crisis--Freddie Mac and Franny Mae were.]
    "...And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today.  More businesses would certainly have closed.  More homes would have surely been lost.  So I supported the last administration's efforts to create the financial rescue program, and when we took over, we made it more transparent and more accountable, and, as a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we recovered most of the money, we spent on the banks--most but not all.  To recover the rest, I proposed a fee on the biggest banks.  Now, I know Wall Street isn't keen on this idea, but if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need...."  [Well, most of the banks that had ties to TARP money repaid the TARP money and the required interest.  I do believe others that have to pay back TARP money and pay the required interest will as scheduled, so if the federal government imposes a tax on them, they still have to pay the TARP money and the interest and they will also have pay more--the tax.  It seems very likely to me that action will reduce the return on investments that investors in those banks will get.  What proof does Barack Obama have that the actions of the federal government in 2008 stopped the unemployment figure from being double today.  When Barack Obama was trying to pass the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in early 2009, Barack Obama said that the unemployment rate would not go higher than eight percent if it were passed, but once the defective act was passed, the unemployment rate went above ten percent, and the general unemployment rate is yet around ten percent.]
    "...That's why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than eighteen-million Americans, made health insurance sixty-five-percent cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA, and passed twenty-five different tax cuts.  Now, let me repeat.  We cut tax.  We cut taxes for ninety-five percent of working families, we cut taxes for small businesses, we cut taxes for first-time home buyers, we cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children, we cut taxes for eight-million Americans paying for college...."  [Ugh!]
    "...And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person--not a single dime...."  [This statement is wrong.  For one, some people working in the financial industry had their income taxes raised, but I will not turn push the idea about "income taxes."  I have to note that Barack Obama has being working to push through legislation, such as a national-health-care bill and cap-and-trade bill, that would raise so many other fees on Americans.]
    "...Now, because of the steps we took, there are about two-million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed.  Two-hundred-thousand work in construction and clean energy.  Three-hundred thousand are teachers and other education workers.  Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, first responders.  And we're on track to add another one-and-a-half-million jobs to this total by the end of the year...."  [It has been shown that, in 2009, employment increased in government but not in the private sector.  Notice, how Barack Obama only pointed to government-related people in the set of words.  So far, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has been used to support or prop up states, such as California and Michigan, that could not control their budgets and are, in essence, bankrupt, or the act has been used to keep bad state politicians in power, and the act has not really been used to help the private-sector of the economy.]
    "...Economists on the left and the right say this bill has helped save jobs and avert disaster, but you don't have to take their word for it, talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act, talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created...."  [I could talk a while about this one, but I will only leave you with this thought.  By presenting a few examples of increased employment, did Barack Obama really tell the truth about how the Recovery Act (the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) is working?  There could be ten cases or one-hundred cases or a million cases that counter his argument.  Since the unemployment rate, basically, rose continually from the date that the act was made law in February 2009 to the end of 2009, you should wonder how Barack Obama can make any statement like that which he made.]
    "...And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again...."  [Barack Obama lied here.]
    "...Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America's businesses...."  [Wow!  I am shocked!  Barack Obama actually said this.  But does he believe it or does he care?]
    "...When you talk to small businesses in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania, or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that, even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they're mostly lending to bigger companies.  Financing remains difficult for small-business owners across the country, even those that are making a profit.  So, tonight, I'm proposing that we take thirty-billion dollars of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat...."  [Yell out in horror here!  If community banks get involved in this program, the federal government will have some control in them.  Barack Obama has shown that he is a type of man who wants government to control or own the banks in a country.  If businesses get involved with this money, would the federal government--Barack Obama--have some control of them? Look at what happened to General Motors and Chrysler in 2009.  And a business that does not pay back such a loan or cannot pay back such as loan could end up being owned by someone beholden to Barack Obama.  Look at what happened to General Motors and Chrysler.]
    "...I'm also proposing a new small-business tax credit, one that will go to over one-million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages...."  [A business hires someone when it has enough money to hire the someone, and, most often, to hire a full-time employee, a company will have to spend (in wages, health care, workers' compensation insurance, whatever, et cetera) anywhere from $10,000 to $50,000 or more.  If the tax credit is $3,000 or $4,000 for one employee (which are figures that have been proposed in the past) in relation to one year, but the cost to have an employee could cost a company $10,000 or $20,000 or $30,000 or more a year, a company will not hire anyone till the company has enough revenue to cover the cost of having the employee.]
    "...But the truth is these steps won't make up for the seven-million jobs that we've lost over the last two years.  The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth and finally address the problems that America's families have confronted for years.  We can't afford another so-called economic expansion like the one from the last decade, what some call the "Lost Decade," where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion, where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health-care tuition reached record highs, where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation...." [An expansion is an expansion!  No expansion is no expansion!  So, is Barack Obama putting down the expansion?  I have heard the Democrats note that the U.S. President George W. Bush years were a time of recession all the time, but, here, Barack Obama said that there was expansion.  Something does not make sense.  Also, what is Barack Obama's "new foundation"?  Maybe, Barack Obama's new foundation is a structure in which the government owns and controls all businesses.  By the way, I have not heard anyone say that the last decade was the "Lost Decade," but I have heard about how the 1990s are thought of as the "Lost Decade" for Japan.]
    "...It's time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.  Now one place to start is serious financial reform.  Look.  I am not interested in punishing banks, I'm interested in protecting our economy.  A strong health financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs, it channels the savings of families as investments that raise incomes.  But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.  We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions.  We can't allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy...."   [Here was more crap from Barack Obama.  Since the 1700s, businesses, such as banks, have taken risks with the money that was tied to them, such as that related to savings accounts.  For example, one type of risk has been the lending money to a man who had the idea for a new business, which may to well or may not, and another type of risk has been lending millions to a business to buy another business, which might be failing, and yet another type of risk has been lending millions to build a subdivision of one-thousand homes.  How does Barack Obama know what type of risk can affect an entire economy and how can he set limits?]
    "...and that means building a new generation of safe clean nuclear power plants in this country.  It means making tough decisions about opening offshore areas for oil and gas development.  It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies.  And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America...."  [At this point, the cap-and-trade bill does not promoted coal technologies and nuclear power plants.  Research about Barack Obama shows that he does not support coal technology or nuclear-power technology--he supports windmills and solar cells.  Here, Barack Obama passed along crap!]
    "...I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change, but, but here's the thing, even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future, because the nation that leads the clean-energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy, and America must be that nation...."  [You are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which shows information about "Climate-gate" and which can be reached by using this link: Carbon.  Since manmade climate change or manmade global warming is a hoax, the potential for a country to be a big deal while leading the way in clean energy industries is defective and not likely.  Who are going to be the buyers--countries--of the products and services.  You are urged to see my document entitled The Power and the Power Killers: Energy in the United States of America, which shows how the wind-turbine-farm idea is going to be a failure and which can be reached by using this link: Power.]
    "...So tonight we set a new goal, we will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two-million jobs America...."  [The private-sector economy is stalled (if not dying) because of  government policies, so how are we going to meet that goal?  I guess Barack Obama is going to "will it" in someway or "will it" like a God might]
    "...That's why I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway for the children of so many working families.  To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that go to banks for student loans.  Instead, let's take that money and give families a ten-thousand-dollar tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants.  And let's tell another one-million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only ten percent of their income on student loans and all of their debt will be forgiven after twenty years and forgiven after ten years if they choose a career in public service, because, in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they choose to go to college...."  [This is a scary piece of thought, and I could talk about a number of topics, but I will only talk about the worst.  Notice how Barack Obama set up the idea that people would not have to pay back loans.  And, beyond that, people who go into the public sector--the government--would get a better deal than those who do into the private sector.  Welcome to the communist state!]
    "...And, and it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health-insurance reform...."   [It is publicly known that a majority of the people in the country do not want the health-care bills that Barack Obama has been pushing for about a year, but Barack Obama is still pushing for his reform.]
    "...Now, let's clear a few things up.  I didn't choose to tackle issue to get some legislative victory under my belt, and by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn't take on health care because it was good politics...."  [Ugh!]
    "...It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses.  And according to the Congressional Budget Office--the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official score keeper for Congress--our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as one-trillion dollars over the next decade...."  [This lie about a national-health-care system would take a while to show up, but keep in mind, Barack Obama is trying to create another "entitled program," sort of like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and entitled programs never meet the predictions about them, and, in fact, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid can be considered bankrupt.]
    "...There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health-care experts, who know our system best, consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo.  But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know.  Let me know!  Let me know!.  I eager to see it...."  [Here is publicly known fact: To date, Republicans have been all but locked out of the construction process of the health-care bills and, in fact, they have even been physically locked out the process much of the time.  Barack Obama does not listen to the ideas of others!  This set of words is more crap from the defective mind of Barack Obama.]
    "...So let me start the discussion on government spending by setting the record straight.  At the beginning of the last decade, the year 2000, America had a budget surplus of over two-hundred-billion dollars.  By, by the time I took office, we had a one-year deficit of over one-trillion dollars and projected deficits of eight-trillion dollars over the next decade.  Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription-drug program.  On top of that, the effects of a recession put a three-trillion-dollar hole in our budget.  All this was before I walked in the door.  Now, now.  Just statin' the facts!  Now, if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit.  But we took office amid a crisis, and our efforts to prevent a second Depression have added another one-trillion dollars to our national debt.  That too is a fact!  I'm absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do...."  [And it is a fact that, in essence, Barack Obama has tripled the debt and is not done, having about three more years to spend money!]
    "...So, tonight, I'm proposing specific steps to pay for the trillion dollars that it took to rescue the economy last year.  Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years.  Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected.  But all other discretionary government programs will.  Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't...."  [Three big budget killers each year are Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, and Barack Obama is not working to take care of them, such as by weeding out the corruption (certainly, over the years, you have heard about fraud incidents related to this "entitlement' programs).  Ask yourself: What is a spending freeze?  You are strongly urged to see my document entitled THOUGHTS AND STATEMENTS ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the individual woman and the individual man, since it talks about "zero-line budgeting" and "baseline budgeting" under the section known as "Thought Number Four," and it can be reached by using this link: Thought.]
    "...We will continue to go through the budget line by line, page by page to eliminate programs that we can't afford and don't work.  We've already identified twenty-billion dollars in savings for next year.  To help working families, we'll extend our middle-class tax cuts.  But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, for investment fund managers, and for those making over two-hundred-fifty-thousand dollars year.  We just can't afford it!...."  [We have heard this before, some of it for over a year. Wow!  You should ask: Barack Obama has "identified," but has Barack Obama removed?  By the way, he has spent trillions of dollars that he should not have, and he is working to save twenty-billiion dollars.  Just great!  I say that, in Barack Obama's mind, it is still--attack those executives--and I say that Barack Obama is so jealous of such executives that he has to knock them down in his mind all the time to make himself look better in his mind and make him look better than the executives in the minds of the people or his people or the little people.  Sick, is it not?  A sign of a really ill mind, it is not?]
    "Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we'll still face the massive deficit we have when I took office.  More importantly, the cost of Medicare Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket.  That's why I've called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad.  This can't be one of those Washington gimmicks that let's us pretend we solve a problem.  The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline.  Now, yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill the created this commission.  So, I'll issue an Executive Order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem onto another generation of Americans...."  [Such nonsense this idea is.  Since the 1700s, the U.S. Congress and the U.S. President have had the responsibility to create bills and acts and deal with the budgets; for instance, the U.S. Congress has committees that are supposed to deal with money, and the U.S. President can veto bills with too much spending.  Now, Barack Obama wants some type of board to exist, though, as a matter of law, it will still be up the U.S. Congress and the U.S. President to sign "yes" or "no" to spending and to bills.  Really, the proposed committee will do nothing, unless Barack Obama can make the committee "the entity" under his control that decides all spending and he can get rid of the U.S. Congress, at least in relation to matters on spending.]
    "...That's why we've excluded lobbyists from policy making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.  But we can't stop there.  It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or we Congress.  It's a time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office.  With all due deference to separation of powers, last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections.  I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests or worse by foreign entities.  They should be decided by the American people, and I urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems...."  [Let me show two things that happened at the same time.  At one point during the speech, Barack Obama was saying: "...including foreign corporations, to spend without limit...."  Meanwhile, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were sitting, in essence, in front of Barack Obama, and U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was sitting at the far left of the group of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices (as seen by television viewers), and Samuel Alito nodded his head "no" and mouthed some words, two of which were: "..not true."]
    "...As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibility leaving Iraq to its people.  As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I'm doing as President.  We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August.  We will support, we will support the Iraqi government, we will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and we will continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity.  But make no mistake--This war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home...."  [I put this here to simply note that he gave a firm date.  Now, let us see what happens in real life.]
    "...Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and around the world, they have to know that we, that, tha, tha they have our respect, our gratitude, our full support...."  [This set of words was truly telling.  Barack Obama was using a teleprompter, and he made few mistakes, most of which were very, very small.  Since I have done broadcasting on the airwaves of Michigan for about thirty-two years, I can detect errors, even very slight errors, when someone is announcing or talking.  When trying to say this set of words, Barack Obama made a clear error--a big error.  It sounded as if Barack Obama were trying to say something that he did not believe, and Barack Obama's defective mind caused him to stumble.]
    "...This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are.  It's the right thing to do..."  [I make no comment here; I simply note that it was said.]
    "...Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers.  Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country.  They take pride in their labor and are generous in spirit.  These aren't Republican values or Democratic values that they're living by, business values or labor values, they're American values.  Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions--our corporations, our media, and, yes, our govenment--still reflect these same values.  Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women, doing important work that helps our country prosper.  But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people's doubts grow...."  [Here was another attack on the banker and business owner and what is made by such a person, and here was another attempt to fuel some type of class hatred.  So, are you smart enough to get such a complex job as a bank president job and, to do well in the job, which will allow you to keep the job and not be fired?  I do not believe Barack Obama is smart enough to do such work!]
    "...We don't quit!  I don't quit!  Let's seize this moment to start anew, to carry the dream forward and to strengthen our union once more...."  [Yes, no matter how defective the ideas, the defective mind of Barack Obama will press on.  Barack Obama does not quit!  And we thank you for the warning that tells us that we have to continue to fight against you and we have to push you deeper into the ground.]

    Friday, January 29, 2009 (in Baltimore, Maryland, for "Republican House Retreat");
    "...I want us to have a constructive debate.  The only thing I don't want--and here I am listening to the American people and I think don't want either--is for Washington ta continue being so Washington-like.  I know folks, ah, when we're in, in town there, ah, spending a lot of time reading the polls and looking at focus groups and interpreting which party has the upper hand in November and in 2012 and so on, and so on, so on.  That their obsession.  And I'm not a pundit, I'm just a President, so take it for what it's worth...."  [Barack Obama went to this event without his teleprompter.  If you examine this section, you will find flubs, and you will find that, when he does not have a teleprompter, he does not speak so smoothly after all, and, in fact, you will find rambling.  What I could not show through this section, though, is how Barack Obama stalled and hesitated between some words.  By the way, much of this section presents ideas related to health-care legislation, and, to date, Barack Obama has for the most part used no ideas of the Republicans--Barack Obama does not listen to anyone who does not follow his political ideology.]
    "...We've seen party-line votes that--I just going to be honest--ah, were disappointing.  Let's start with our efforts to jump start the economy last winter.  We were losing seven-hundred-thousand jobs a month, our financial system teetered on the brink of collapse, and the threat of a second Great Depression loomed large.  I didn't understand then, ah, and I still don't understand, ah, why, ah, we got opposition in this caucus.  As I recall, the opposition was declared even before we had a chance to actually meet and exchange ideas.  The latest GDP numbers show that our economy is growing by almost six percent.  That's the most since 2003.  This turn around is the biggest in nearly three decades.  And it didn't happen by accident...."   [In late 2008 and early 2009, Barack Obama's actual policies were not to blame, but his announced intentions did hurt the economy, and those announced proposed policies--those that might be offered up by a Marxist or a hard-left socialist--scared the business community, and the stock markets went down, and business operators began hiring freezes or laid off people, fearing trouble for their businesses in the near future, and that caused businesses to cut back on expenses, such as the cost of employees.  By the way, the GDP number for the fourth quarter is what Barack Obama was referring to, and that number had been announced hours earlier as 5.7 percent (Rugaber, Christopher S.  "Economic growth my slow as spending stalls." Detroit Free Press, 30 January 2010, p. 9A.).  The GDP figure is defective, but I will not explain why here.  You should see the entry for October 29, 2009, which shows how GDP figures can be downgraded later.  Anyway, November and December are holiday months, and they do not really reflect what a year did or a coming year will be; remember, by the way, people are hired for temporary holiday jobs in November and December.  Sometime in the future, this entry will be adjusted when new information about the GDP is released.]
    "...We had lost six-hundred-fifty-thousand jobs in December.  Ah I'm assuming, ah, you're not faulting my policies for that  We had lost--it turns out--seven-hundered-thousand jobs in January, the month I was sworn in.  I'm assuming they [?] wasn't my administration policies that accounted for that.  We lost another six-hundred-and-fifty-thousand jobs the subsequent month, before any of my policies has gone into effect.  So I'm assuming that wasn't as consequence of our policies.  That doesn't reflect the failure of the Recovery Act...."  [It has been publicly shown that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (February 17, 2009) has been a failure, creating very few jobs in the private sector, but it was not really designed to increase employment in the private sector, and much of the money has gone to states so that they could shore up their deficits--temporarily.  Read the response to the previous quoted material, since it pertains to this quotation, too.]
    "...The notion that I would somehow resist doing something that caught, cost half as much but would produce twice as many jobs.  Why would I resist that?  I, I wouldn't, I mean if that's, that's my point.  Is, is, is that, eh, I am not an ideologue.  I'm not.  It doesn't make sense if somebody could tell me, 'You could do this cheaper, and it increased results.'  Then, I want to say, 'Great!'  The problem is I couldn't find credible economists who would backup the claims that you just made...."  [This statement, which was related to the health-care legislation, is crap.  There are a lot of credible economists, such as the nationally syndicated writer known as Thomas Soales.  Of course, Thomas Soales is not a communist or a socialist or a Marxist or a black radical, as is Barack Obama.  Thomas Soales is simply a regular American, who, I have found, likes the country and The U.S. Constitution.  I could say more about his nonsense, but I shall not.  Oh, yes, Barack Obama is an "idealog!"  He lied in saying that he is not.  If you think about it--Why did Barack Obama have to bring up the subject about his being or not being an ideologue, if he were not?  It seems to me Barack Obama was trying to convince the group that he was not an ideologue, as he might try to convince a bunch of dummies, who were very likely to believe him.]
    "...What you may consider across-the-board tax cuts could be, for example, greater tax cuts for people who are makin' a million dollars.  I may not agree to a tax cut for Warren Buffett.  You may be calling for across-the-board tax cut for the banking industry, right now.  I may not agree to that...."  [Here is a fact, U.S. President Ronald Reagan did across-the-board tax cuts in the 1980s, and U.S. President George W. Bush did across-the-board tax cuts about a decade ago.   Barack Obama likes to tax the rich--you know, anyone making $250,000 [gross income] a year, such as a business grossing $250,000 (such as a plumbing business, a roofing business, a car-repair shop, or a hardware store.]
    "...Now some of you went after this bill, you'd think that this thing was some Bolshevik plot.  Now, I, I mean that's how you guys, that's how you guys presented it.  The way these issues are being presented by the Republicans is that this is some wild-eyed plot to impose huge government in every aspect of our lives, what happens is you guys then don't have a lot of room to negotiate with me.  If you voted with the administration on something, [you] are politically vulnerable in your own base, you've given yourselves very little room to work in a bipartisan fashion, because what you've been telling your constituents is, 'His guy's doing all kinds of crazy stuff that's going to destroy America'...."  [The Bolsheviks were those statists--dictators, communists, Marxists, et cetera--who set up that wonderful--I say "Ha!" to that "wonderful"--Russia of 1917, and yes, it is clearly evident that Barack Obama's policies involve communism, Marxism, socialism, fascism, and other defective political ideologies.  Now, that you have that comment from me, examine Barack Obama's words and try to determine his purpose in saying it.]

    Monday, February 1, 2010 (a public statement about his proposed budget):
    "...Ten years ago, we had a budget surplus of more than two-hundred-billion dollars with projected surpluses stretching out toward the horizon.  In over the course of the past ten years, the previous administration and previous Congresses created an expensive new drug program, past massive tax cuts for the wealthy, and funded two wars without paying for any of it, all of which was compounded by recession and by rising health-care costs.  As a result, when I first walked through the door, the deficit stood at one-point-three-trillion dollars with projected deficits of eight-trillion over the next decade...."  [I obtained this clip from The Rush Limbaugh Show, a nationally syndicated radio show, while far from home.   On the same day, I heard Rush Limbaugh report that the deficit amount for the last year of the U.S. President George Bush administration was four-hundred-fifty-four-point-eight-billion dollars (or 454.8-billion dollars) and that the Barack Obama adminstration raised the federal deficit over the next year or at the end of the first year of the Barack Obama administation to one-point-four-two-trillion dollars (or 1.42-trillion dollars or 1,420-billion dollars).  Notice the difference between 454.8 billion and 1,420 billion.  When you divide 1,420 by by 454.8, you get: 3.1360424.   The deficit is now three times higher--at least.  On Friday, January 29, 2010, Barack Obama attended a gathering of Republicans from the U.S. House of Representatives, and one of the Republicans, there, was Jeb Hensarling (who was and is associated with Texas), who did not get on well with Barack Obama, and Jef Hensarling appeared on MSNBC on Monday, February 1, 2010, and made comments about Friday, such as: "...Well, either the President misunderstood the point or he just hasn't been well informed.  If you look at the twelve years when Republicans controlled the Congress, the average annual deficit was about one-hundred-and-four billion.  I, I'm not proud of that number.  That's too high.  But in the three years that Democrats have controlled Congress, the average annual deficit is now one-point-one-trillion.  Do the math!  What used to be an annual deficit under Republicans has become a monthly deficit under Democrats.  And so when the President says, 'I inherited a big deficit.'  I agree, but he inherited it from Democratic Congress, and only Congress can spend the money.  That's the point I was making.  Facts are facts...."  That quotation I obtained from The Rush Limbaugh Show.  Now, keep the "massive tax cuts" part of Barack Obama's statement in mind, and now read the next quoted material.]
    "...I proposed a fee on big banks to pay back taxpayers for bailout.  We're reforming the way contracts are awarded to save taxpayers billions of dollars.  And while we extend middle-class tax cuts in this budget, we will not continue costly tax cuts for oil companies, investment-fund managers, and those making over two-hundred-five-thousand a year.  We just can't afford it...."  [Notice how Barack Obama believes "tax cuts" are "costly."  The money that the federal government has comes from citizens and the companies that citizens run and operate.  Barack Obama believes keeping money out of the hands of the government is "costly."   I shall say no more about that so that you can think about the idea.]
    "...We simply cannot continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if waste doesn't matter, as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money, as if we can ignore this challenge for another generation.  We can't!  In order to meet this challenge, I welcome any idea from Democrats and Republicans.  What I will not welcome, what I reject, is the same old grandstanding when the cameras are on and the same irresponsible budget policies when the cameras are off.  It's time to hold Washington to the same standards families and businesses hold themselves.  It's time to save what we can, to spend what we must, and live within our means once again...."  [In the recent past, Barack Obama has passed along the idea that government has to cut back on spending, and it has all been a sham.  Here, Barack Obama continued to lie and promote the sham.  In addition, Barack Obama introduced the idea of "grandstanding."  Every day, Barack Obama is making a speech somewhere.  Look back at all the entries that make up this document, and I have miss many, many speeches.  What Barack Obama has done over the last year or so is grandstand about everything!  No Republican has done anything in the way of grandstanding as Barack Obama has, and no Republican can since, in essence, Barack Obama can control and manipulate so much of the main media of the country.]

    Wednesday, February 3, 2010:
    "...Part of the reason people are feelin' anxious, right now, it's not just because of this current crisis--they've been goin' through this for ten years.  If our response ends up being, you know, ah, because we don't want to stir things up here--we're just gonna do the same thing that was being done before, then I, I, I don't know what differentiates us from the other guys.  Blanche is exactly right.  We've got to be non-ideological about our approach to these things.  We got to make sure that our party understands that like it or not we have to have a financial system that is healthy and functioning, so we can't be demonizing, ah, every bank out there.  We've got to be the party of business--small business and large business--because they produce jobs...."  [This set of words is one for the history books.  The statement is counter to everything Barack Obama believes.  Barack Obama has shown he does not wants to be the party of business--Barack Obama has not really done anything for the private sector of the country since January 20, 2009, and, in fact, it can be shown Barack Obama has purposely worked to hurt the private sector.  Look over the line that contains the "like it or not" block of words.  When you analyze the line, you get--Barack Obama seems to present the idea that the Democratic Party and he have to put up with "a financial system that is healthy and functioning," though it is not what they really want.  And who are the "other guys" that Barack Obama talked about?  If those other guys are the American people and "conservative politicians" who believe in The U.S. Constitution and who fight to protect it, then those other guys are, yes, different from him.]

    Sunday, February 7, 2010 (interviewed by Katie Couric live during Super Bowl XLIV Today):
    "Well, what I've been doing is consulting closely with the leaders in the House and the leaders in the Senate on the Democratic side, and I want to consult closely with, ah, our Republican colleagues, so they're going to be coming in, ah, to the White House next week, and what I want to do is ask them is to put their ideas on the table and then after the recess, which will be a few weeks away, I want to come back and have a, ah, large meeting--Republicans and Democrats--to go through systematically all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward.  Ah, but part of the reason that people need to understand we can't back off on this, ah, the major insurer, one of the major insurers in California just announced that, in the individual market, they're increasing their premiums by thirty-nine percent.  That's a portrait of the future if don't do something now.  It's gonna keep on beatin' down families, small businesses, ah, large businesess--it's going to be a huge drain on the economy.  We're going to have to do something about it, and I think we can."  [For the first time ever, a U.S. President used a Super Bowl pre-game show to promote his political agenda, and CBS-TV was a party to it, and Barack Obama did it in an interview with Katie Couric, and the opening topic was health-care legislation and not the Super Bowl game that was to be played in a few hours.  The quoted material, here, was Barack Obama's answer to the first question raised by Katie Couric.  And during the interview, Barack Obama once again passed along flap doodle.]
    "Well, eh, ah, I think that what I want to do is to look at the Republican ideas that are out there, ah, and I would want to be very specific--How do you guys want ta lower costs, how do you guys intend ta reform the insurance markets so people with pre-existing conditions, for example, can get health care, how do you want to make sure that the thirty-million people who don't have health insurance can get it, what are your ideas specifically?  And if we can go step by step through a series of, ah, these issues and arrive at some agreements, then procedurally, there's no reason why we can't do it a lot faster than the process took last year."  [This was the response to the second question from Katie Couric.  Did you find the lies?  For example, an analysis of history shows Barack Obama does not listen to Republicans.]
    "No, ah, because keep in mind, jobs were my number-one priority last year.  That's why we passed the Recovery Act to make sure that not only do we put three-hundred-billion dollars worth of tax cuts in to people's pockets so that there was demand and businesses had customers.  That's why we provided over two-hundred-billiion dollars in assistance to states so they wouldn't have to lay off teachers and cops and firefighters, and that all supported, ah, maintaining the jobs that we had.  Ah, that's why we moved forward on infrastructure and clean energy and a lot of jobs, ah, creation, ah, and it, having taken those steps very quickly at the front end--at the beginning of the year--it was important for us also to start looking at these issues that middle-class families have been struggling with for decades now.  And do I wish we could have done it faster, that it hadn't been so painfully slow through the legislative process?  Absolutely!  Ah, but it was the right thing to do then.  It continues to be the right thing."  [This was the response to the third question from Katie Couric.  Did you see the lies?  How many private-sector jobs were created?  Somewhere around six-million jobs or seven-million jobs were lost.]
    "...I'd say that we are seeing the corner turn on the economy growing again.  Last year at this time, the economy had contracted, had shrunk by six percent.  We know now that, last quarter, it had grown by six percent....."  [This portion of quoted material came from later in the interview.  Barack Obama's "six percent" figure of growth is defective.  The figure refers to GDP.  It was reported on Friday, January 29, 2010, that the GDP figure for the fourth quarter of 2009 was 5.7 percent (Rugaber, Christopher S.  "Economic growth may slow as spending stalls."  Detroit Free Press, 20 January 2010, p. 9A.).  It is very likely the GDP figure will be downgraded in the near future.  You should see the entry for October 29, 2009, which talks about the previous GDP and shows how it got downgraded over time.  In the future, I will update this section to show revised figures.]
    "....And my hope is that, for folks who are unemployed, they're gonna start seeing, ah, concrete improvement in their own lives in the next few months...."   [Keep Barack Obama's statement in mind!  Right now, though, I say that I see there will be short-term employment opportunities for some people in the near future--for those who take part in the census count.  Boy, that commercial for the census that I saw during the pre-game show for the Super Bowl and the commercial for the census that I saw during the Super Bowl seemed useless and a waste of money (the federal government spent big money for the commercials).  By the way, the lead actor in both commercials was Ed Begley, Jr., who is a big manmade-global-warming proponent and has a television show (Living with Ed) on the Planet Green network, and Barack Obama is pushing to get cap-and-trade rules or strict environmental rules established in the country, which will hurt the country, and that is the way of evil men today.]

    Tuesday, February 9, 2010 (in front of the press once more):
    "...The small businesses I talk to--and I've been talking to a lot of them as, as I've been traveling, ah, around the country--their biggest problem is right now they can't get credit out of their banks, so they're uncertain about that, and they're still uncertain about orders...do they just have enough customers to justify them doing more?  It's looking better at this point, ah, but that's not the rational for people saying, 'I'm not hiring!'  Let me, let me put it this way.  Most small businesses right now they've got enough customers to make a profit, and [if] they can get the bank loans required to boost their payroll, boost their inventory, and to sell to those customers, they will do so...."  [On this day, Barack Obama was in front of the press again, and he made a number of comments that could fit in this section, but I choose to only list this comment, because, in my mind, it could qualify as the dumbest comment or the most dangerous comment from a U.S. President of the twenty-first century.  Let us examine it.  A company does not borrow money to hire more people.  When a company is getting a demand for its product or service and when the company has not enough employees to produce enough product or service for customers, the company will hire people, and, ultimately, a company hires more people because revenue increases and allows the company to hire people.  A company may borrow money once or twice or from time to time to pay currently existing employees, if, for some reason, the company is cash poor for some reason at the time employees must be paid (the company may get involved in "commercial paper" in such a case, and it can involve investors buying the paper for short-term gains).  It is customers--a lack of them or not a lack of them--that drives what a business operator will do in relation to hiring employees and keeping employees.  An operator of a business does not decide, "I will go out and get a loan so that I can hire more employees."  A company may get a loan so that the company can, for example, build a building or buy a piece of machinery.  By the way, a company does not have to get a loan to build up an inventory; for example, a store may take on new product through a consignment idea, in which the producer of the product will not get paid till the product is sold, and, really, the producer of the product will get a percentage of the purchase price of the product.  It is possible for a company to make a profit and yet not have enough profit that can be used to hire more people; for example, if the profit in one business quarter is $10.00, but the cost of having and keeping an employee for a business quarter is $1,000, then the company cannot hire an employee, but that $10.00 could be used to pay a debt that will come in the next quarter (when, maybe, the revenue from customers may be lower than it was in previous quarter).  Barack Obama's mind is filled with a lot of nonsense thought.  A problem comes to me here!  Either when Barack Obama made this comment, Barack Obama showed his stupidity about how economics works, or when Barack Obama made this comment, Barack Obama purposely made the statement to simply make it or to lie to people in the audience who know little about business (knowing really what happens).  In either case, Barack Obama is a dangerous man and an evil man, and it is clear that Barack Obama is working to make the business community look bad in the eyes of at least some people so that Barack Obama can push the idea that his political ideas are right and that the government should take over businesses--those evil entities that are purposely causing unemployment and make more profits.  You had better understand that "those evil entities that are purposely causing unemployment and trying to make more profits" is said in jest or as a joke.]

    [Note: On Wednesday, February 17, 2010, during The Rush Limbaugh Program (a nationally syndicated radio show) Rush Limbaugh talked about Adolph Hitler's "big lie" theory, which was written about in Adolph Hitler's book entitled Mein Kampf (volume one of two volumes), and Rush Limbaugh read a portion of the book, particularly text in chapter ten ("Causes of the Collapse") of volume one.  Here is what Rush Limbaugh read (I have left out Rush Limbaugh's asides), and, of course, it is an English version: "...All this was inspired by the principle, which is quite true in itself, that in the big lie, there was always a certain force of credibility, because the broad masses of the nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and, thus, in the primitive simplicity of their minds, they more readily fall victim to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale lies.  It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths and they would not believe that others could have the impetus to distort the truth so infamously, even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will no doubt waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation, other than it is a lie...."  A person can deduce Barack Obama could be using the "big lie" theory, believing people could not possibly believe that he is lying so much and so greatly and believing some of what he says will be believed by the people or almost all passed on will be believed by the people someday.]

    Wednesday, February 17, 2010:
    "...I want to begin by recalling where we were one year ago. Millions of jobs had already been lost to the recession before I was sworn into office.  Another eight-hundred thousand would be lost in the month of January.  We'd later learn that our economy had shrunk by an astounding 6.4 percent in the first quarter of 2009.  And economists across the political spectrum warned that if dramatic action was not taken to break the back of the recession, the United States could spiral into another depression.  That was the backdrop against which I signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in Denver with Blake alongside..."  [One year previous, Barack Obama had signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and, on this day, Barack Obama tried to persuade people of the benefits that had been gained from the bill so far, and it was another day in which Barack Obama spoke lie upon lie upon lie.]
    "...One year later, it is largely thanks to the Recovery Act, the second depression is no longer a possibility...."  [To date, most of the money that has been used from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has been used to cover the shortfalls in the budgets of states, most of which have done nothing to really take care of their budget deficits, such as by cutting spending, and will in the near future run out of that government money that is keeping them afloat.]
    "...We see some polling where about twice as many people think we've raised taxes as lower taxes.  Ninety-five percent of ya got a tax cut...."   [Whose poll was the focus here? There was that nonsense "ninety-five percent" tax-cut thing again.  Ugh!.]
    "...We knew that, even before the crisis hit, we'd come through what some people are calling the 'lost decade,' a period where there was barely any job growth and where the income of the average American household declined...."  [To date, it is really only Barack Obama who has been calling the previous decade the "lost decade,"  as far as I can tell.  It does seem very likely to me that other Democrats--politicans and pundits--will start using the term regularly to support Barack Obama.  For now, I say that, today, the general unemployment rate is around ten percent, which is about double what it was during the U.S. George W. Bush presidency.]
    "...Yesterday, I announced loan guarantees to break ground on America's first new nuclear power plant in nearly three decades--a plant that will create thousands of construction jobs and eight-hundred permanent jobs in years to come...."  [This statement bothers me, as it should you.  Barack Obama has not promoted nuclear power in the past.  Notice that Barack Obama talked about "loan guarantees."  When Barack Obama talks about loan guarantees, I think it will have something to do with the government's taking interest in or control of nuclear power plants--nationalizing them in some way.  Barack Obama is a type of man who wants government to own or control all businesses.  Oh, if construction on the plant is ever start, it will create jobs, and if the plant is ever built, there will be regular jobs for some people.  Incidentally, it can take many years to build a nuclear power plant, so do not hold your breath.]

    On Thursday, February 18, 2010 (the announcement of the creation of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which will be an entity made up of sixteen persons):
    "...Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles are taking on the impossible.  They're going to try to restore reason to the fiscal debate and come up with answers as the co-chairs of the new National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.  I'm asking them to produce clear recommendations on how to cover the costs of all federal programs by 2015 and to meaningfully improve our long-term fiscal picture...."  [Remember: It is the U.S. President and the members of the U.S. Congress who have the job of determining the spending that is done by the federal government, as it has been for decades and decades and decades, and there has been no reason for such as entity as the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform to exist in the past, and the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform--by now existing--is just another thing that will use money.  You should ask yourself: What is the real reason for creating this entity?  One reason for creating the entity that comes to my mind is to give the public, especially the stupid, the impression that something is being done to fix the country.  It could be argued well by me that Barack Obama created the commission so that the commisson will use money, having shown he is purposely working to hurt the country financially by spending, spending, spending.  Let me play a game here.  If you have sixteen persons who are being paid $100,000 a year, then you are spending $1,600,000, and when you have such sixteen person doing their work, then there are support people to pay for, and there are offices to pay for, and there are telephones to pay for, and there can be transportation to pay for, et cetera.  It must be remembered that, on September 16, 2008, Barack Obama made this statement while in Golden, Colorado: "...This morning, instead of offering up concrete plans to solve these issues, Senator McCain offered up the oldest Washington stunt in the book.  He passed the buck to a commission to study the problem.  Here's the thing.  This isn't 'nine-eleven.'  We know how we got into this mess.  What we need now is leadership that gets us out...."]

    On Thursday, February 25, 2010 (at the Barack Obama Six-Hour-Long [as scheduled] Televised Health-Care Summit):
    "...I can certainly remember Malia comin' into the kitchen one day and saying, 'I can't breathe, daddy.'  And us havin' to rush her to the emergency room because she had asthma.  Or Sasha when she was a baby getting meningitis and havin' to get a spinal tap and, ah, being on antibiotics for three days and us not knowin' whether or not she was goin' emerge okay.  In each of those instances, I remember thinking while sitting in the emergency room, 'What would [have] happened if I didn't have reliable health care?'...."  [It is federal law that no one in need of emergency care can be refused care at a hospital.  Even if Barack Obama would have had no money at the time of the two instances that he mentioned, the children would have received care.  And it seems to me Barack Obama's daughters were treated well when they were ill, since they are both alive and well today.]
    "...I've looked very carefully at John Boehner's plan that he put forward.  Ah, I've looked at Tom Coburn and Senator Byrd's plan, ah, that's been put out there.  Paul Ryan has discussed, ah, some of the issues surrounding Medicare.  I've look at those very carefully...."  [So, between February 2, 2010, and February 25, 2010, there had been changes with Barack Obama--he said that he has seen other plans such as that from U.S. Representative John Boehner (a Republican related to Ohio).  On February 2, 2010, Barack Obama said, "...What I've done is I've said to the Republicans, "Show me what you've got.  You've been sittin' on the sidelines, criticizing what we're proposing...."  However, I note that the Republicans have had ideas about health-care available online for months.]

    Wednesday, March 3, 2010 (a public appearance to push the U.S. Congress to pass a health-care bill, hinting that the U.S. Congress should do so by using, for one, the "budget reconciliation" process of the U.S. Senate):
    "...At one end of the spectrum, there are some who suggested that scrapping our system of private insurance and replacing it with a government-run health-care system, and though many other countries have such a system, in America, it would be neither practical or realistic...."  [To date, the health-care bills in the U.S. Congress that have had Barack Obama's support--the ones from the Democrats--have been designed to kill private-sector health-care insurance companies, and that is widely known and has been widely reported through radio talk shows and the Internet.]
    "...On the other end of the spectrum, there are those--and this includes most Republicans in Congress--who believe the answer is to loosen regulations on the insurance industry...."  [One of the regulations that the Republicans want to loosen is the one in which each insurance company based in one particular state is not allowed to sell insurance in any of the other states, and the barrier that blocks insurance companies from selling insurance in more than one state is why some states only have a couple insurance companies from which people can get insurance and why competition in the insurance industry is poor.  What "regulations" was Barack Obama talking about?  Barack Obama did not mention any regulations that the Republicans want to remove or loosen--he simply spouted words.]
    "...Essentially, my proposal would change three things about the current health-care system.  First, it would end the worst practices of insurance companies--no longer would they be able to deny your coverage because of pre-existing conditions, no longer would they be able to drop your coverage because you got sick...."  [I have yet to hear or see news reports that show it is common practice for insurance companies to drop people from coverage because the people get sick!  If such a problem existed, the "liberals" in the main media would have done stories about such a common practice--over and over and over again.]

    Monday, March 8, 2010 (a speech in Pennsylvania):
    "...Every decision, every debate, no matter how important it is with the same question--What does this mean for the next election?  What does it mean for your poll numbers?  Is this good for the Democrats or good for the Republicans?  Who won the news cycle?  That's just how Washington is!  They can't help it.  They are obsessed with the sport of politics...."  [I shall let you go back through this document and count the number of quotations that this document contains, and the total figure that you end up with will certainly be far below the number that the total could have been, since I left a lot of quotations out of this document.  Almost every day, Barack Obama is in front of the cameras, and I say that Barack Obama is "obsessed with the sport of politics."  In fact, I could argue well that Barack Obama is simply "obsessed" with hurting the country, doing it as if it were a kid's game.]
    "...[our] cost-cutting measures mirror most of the proposals in the current Senate bill, which reduces most people's premiums and brings down our deficit by up to one-trillion dollars over the next decade because we're spending our health-care dollars more wisely...."  [Barack Obama lied again.]

    Wednesday, March 10, 2010 (in the St. Louis area of Missouri):
    "...And, by the way, I don't recall any of these Republicans tryin' to do anything about insurance companies' abuses during all the years they were in charge....I don't remember them doin' anything about folks who needed some help when the government was running surpluses.  So, I get offense with some of these folks that--it's just never goin' be the right time...."  [If you hear this sets of words in audio from, you will hear how Barack Obama worked to sound like a somewhat uneducated person who does pronounce all the words properly or like a person who is talking in black lingo.  What is important in this set of words is that Barack Obama attacked the insurance companies again, trying to convince people that insurance companies have been getting away with abuses for ages.  Health-insurance companies are highly, highly regulated, and they have been for decades.  Ask yourself: What "abuses" was Barack Obama talking about?  Also ask yourself: What "abuses" have insurance companies been getting away with?]

    Monday, March 15, 2010 (in Cleveland, Ohio):
    "...How many people are gettin' insurance through their job right now?  Raise your hands!  Ah, well, a lot of those folks, through employer, it is estimated would see premiums fall by as much as three-thousand percent, which means they could give you a raise...."  [Barack Obama only had a crowd of about two-hundred persons when he passed along an impossibility--"three-thousand percent."]

    Wednesday, March 17, 2010 (an interview with Bret Baier for the Fox News Channel):
    "...I don't spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or the Senate.  What I, what I, what I...what I can tell you is, what I can tell you is, if that the vote that's taken in the House will be a vote for health-care reform, and if people vote 'yes,' whatever form that takes, it is going to be a vote for health-care reform.  And I don't think we should pretend otherwise, and if....  Bret, let me finish.  And if they don't, if they vote against it, then they're going to be voting against health-care reform, and they're going to be voting in favor of the status quo, so Washington is very concerned about these procedural issues in Congress--this is always an issue that's, whether Republicans are in charge or Democrats [are] in charge...."  [Note: The first two sets of three dots are where the reporter was attempting to interrupt Barack Obama.  Now, the main duty of the U.S. President is to uphold the laws and rules of The U.S. Constitution.  Around this time, Democrats were proposing that they would pass health-care legislation by using a "deeming" rule (informally called the "Slaughter Solution") in the U.S. House of Representatives (and you should see "Special Note #36" in my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this Health link, to learn about the "Slaughter Rule").  The idea that was was proposed was a violation of The U.S. Constitution.]
    "...I am not....  What I am saying is that whatever they end up voting on--and I hope it's going to be sometime this week--that it is going to be a vote for or against my health-care proposal, and that's what matters...."  [Note: The first set of three dots is where the reporter was trying to interrupt Barack Obama.  This statement by Barack Obama was related to the subject of the "deem and pass" rule being proposed in the U.S. House of Representatives or the "Slaughter Solution."  To Barack Obama, the rules in The U.S. Constitution do not matter it seems, since Barack Obama did not discount the "Slaughter Solution."]
    "...We, we will--by the time the vote has taken place, not only I will know what's in it, you'll know what's in it because it's going to be posted...."  [Basically, Barack Obama noted that, after the bill is passed, everyone will then know what is in the bill.]
    "...I get forty-thousand, ah, letters or emails a day....  No, listen, I've got exactly the same emails that I could show you that talk about--Why haven't we done something to make sure that I, a small-business person, am getting as good as a deal as members of Congress are gettin' and don't have my insurance rates jacked up forty percent, why is it that I, a mother with a child with a pre-existing condition, still can't get insurance?  So, the issue that I'm concerned about is whether or not we're fixing a broken system...."  [The first set of three dots is where the two men were talking at the same time.  Regular people cannot get the same deal as the members of Congress can and the members of Congress are exempt from the health-care bill!  Oh, the question dealt with an email question in which a person wondered, for example, if the health-care bill was so great, why has the Democratic leadership had to use bribery to get Congress members to vote "yes."   Barack Obama did not answer the question.]

    Friday, March 19, 2010 (at George Mason University in Virginia):
    "...If this vote fails, the insurance industry will continue to run amuck.  They will continue to deny people coverage.  They will continue to deny people care.  They will continue to jack up premiums forty or fifty or sixty percent as they have in the last few weeks without any accountability whatsoever.  They know this, and that's why their lobbyists are stalking the halls of Congress as we peak and pouring million of dollars into negative ads, and that's why they are doing everything they can to kill this bill.  So, the only question left is this--Are we going to let the special interest win once again or are we goin' to make this vote a victory for the American people?...."  [Ugh!]
    "...We have heard every crazy thing about this bill.  You remember!  First, we heard this was a government take over of health care.  Then, then, we heard that this was gonna kill granny.  Then we heard, well, illegal immigrants are gonna be gettin' a main benefits of this....   There, there has bee--they have thrown every argument at this legislative effort, but when it, it turns out at the end of the day what we're talking about is commonsense reform...."   [Ugh!]

    Saturday March 20, 2010 (before the Democratic Caucus in the House of Representatives):
    "...We are no bound to win, but we are bound to be true.  We are not found to succeed, but we are bound to let whatever light we have shine...."  [Ugh!]

    Tuesday, March 23, 2010 (at the signing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010):
    "...This legislation will also lower costs for families and for businesses and for the federal government, reducing our deficit by over one-trillion dollars in the next two decades...."  [On this day, Barack Obama signed into law a Marxist-type health-care bill into law, which would create a Marxist-type health-care system for the country, which, in a few years, would have the federal government running the health-care system of the country as a monopoly, and, again, at the signing ceremony, Barack Obama lied some more.  Taxes are going up almost immediately on everyone because of the new law.  In January 2011, it is very likely that health-insurance companies will have to raise rates on many persons, since the new federal law has rules that will lead to health-insurance companies being forced to raise rates beyond that related to inflation (at the beginning of a year, the costs of policies usually go up, such as to reflect the effects of inflation, but in the future, insurance companies will be required, for one, to take on more risk or more risky clients, which will increase costs to companies).]
    "...That our generation is able to succeed in passing this reform is a testament to the persistence and the character of the American people, who championed this cause, who mobilized, who organized, who believed--the people who loved this country can change it...."  [Who was Barack Obama talking about by mentioning "the American people" in this statement?   On this day, surveys or polls were showing that about sixty percent of the American people did not want this federal act (or this federal law).  I wonder--How many of the forty percent even know what the rules of the federal act are?  It seems very likely to me many of the forty percent cannot tell anyone else what the act is about and what rules are in the act.  Remember: A lof of people protested against this act when it was yet a bill, such as on the previous Saturday, when somewhere around thirty-thousand persons protested at the Capitol in Washington, D.C.]
    "...We are done...."

    Thursday, March 25, 2010 (in Iowa City, Iowa):
    "...There's been plenty of fear mongering, plenty of over-heated rhetoric.  If you turn on the news, you'll the same folks are still shouting about there's going to be an end to the world because this bill passed.  I'm not exaggerating!  Leaders of the Republican Party, they called the passage of this bill 'armageddon'!   'Armageddon'!  'End of freedom as we know it'!  So, after I signed the bill, I looked around to see if there were any asteroids falling or sudden cracks opening up in the Earth!  Turned out it was a nice day!  Birds were chirpin'.  Folks were strollin' down the mall.  People still had their doctors...."   [This collection of words is not the way of a U.S. President, this collection of words is the rhetoric of an insane man.  A sane man knows that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 will lead to failure of the country in the future, such as by killing jobs, and it will certainly lead to the killing of people of all ages, from unborn babies to senior citizens.  Barack Obama's argument that the world has not falled apart right since the signing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is nonsense thought, and for Barack Obama to make people to think the world is okay and will be okay since the world has not fallen since after the signing of the bill into law is nonsense and deceives the ignorant and naive, and Barack Obama's using such a statement shows the evilness of Barack Obama's mind.]

    Monday, March 29, 2010 [an interview with Matt Lauer of NBC-TV at the White House]:
    "Eh, eh know I think that, ah, it is a loose amalgam of forces.  There's a part of the tea-party movement that did actually exist before I was elected.  Um, we saw some of it leading up to my election.  Ah, there's some folks who just we're sure whether I was born in the United States, whether I was a socialist.  Right?  So, so there's that segment of it, which I think is just dug in ideologically, and that strain has existed in American politics for a long time.  Then, I think that there's a, a broader, ah, circle, ah, around that core group of people who are legitimately concerned about the deficit, who are, ah, ah, legitimately concerned that the federal government, ah, may be taking on too much.  And, last year, a bunch of the emergency measures that we had to take in terms of, ah, dealing with the bank crisis, ah, bailing out the auto industry, ah, fed that sense that things were out of control.  And I think those are folks who have legitimate concerns.  And so I wouldn't paint in broad brush and say that, you know, everybody who's involved or, or have gone to a tea-party rally or meeting, ah, are somehow on the fringe, some of them I think, ah, have some, ah, main-stream legitimate concerns, and, you know, my hope is that, as we move forward and we're tackling things like the deficit and imposing a freeze on domestic spending and taking steps, ah, that show we're sincere about, ah, dealing with our long-term problems that some of that group will dissipate.  There's still gonna be a group at their core that, um, question my legitimacy, ah, or question the Democratic Party generally or question, ah, people who they consider, ah, to be against them in someway, and, and that group we're probably not going to convince."  [I got this piece of interview when it was presented on Today on Tuesday, March 30, 2010, and there is a lot that I could comment on, but I will only cover one topic.  Barack Obama was asked about the tea-party movement.  Notice how Barack Obama worked to convince Matt Lauer and the viewer that, to Barack Obama, few of those that are a part of the tea-party movement think that he is a socialist.  Of course, for example, Barack Obama has been involved in nationalizing banks, which is the way of the socialist, and nationalizing car companies, which is the way of the socialist.  Tomorrow, on March 30, 2010, Barack Obama would sign the Health Care and Education Affordable Reconciliation Act of 2010, which would slightly amend the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and which would nationalize the entire student-loan industry of the country (putting the federal government completely in control of the student-loan industry), which is the way of the socialist, the communist, the Marxist, the dictator, et cetera.]
    "...When you actually look at the bill itself, it incorporates all sorts of Republican ideas.  Ah, I mean a lot of commentators have said, ya know, this is sort of similar to the bill that Mitt Romney, the Republican governor and now presidential candidate, passed in a Massachusetts.  A lot of the ideas in terms of 'exchange'--just being able ta pool, ah, and improve the purchasing power of individuals, ah, in the insurance market, that originated from Heritage Foundation...."  [Barack Obama lied big time through this statement.  The Heritage Foundation did not endorse the 'exchange' idea.  In fact, the Heritage Foundation, which is a "conservative" group that was founded in 1973 that is highly anti-Obama, worked hard to put down the all the proposed national-hearth care bills.  Upon learning about Barack Obama's statement about the Heritage Foundation, on March 30, 2010, the Heritage Foundation issued a press release that refuted Barack Obama's remarks related to The Heritage Foundation, and here is a portion of the press release, which was release to the public and to members of the Heritage Foundation: "...Specifically, President Obama told NBC's Today show host Matt Lauer that a centerpiece of his health care package, 'in terms of the exchange, just being able to pool and improve the purchasing power of individuals in the insurance market-that originated from The Heritage Foundation.'  But the President knows fully well-or he ought to before he speaks-that the exchange we and most others support are very different from those in his package.  True exchanges are simply a market mechanism to enable families to choose their health insurance.  President Obama's exchanges, by contrast, are a vehicle to introduce sweeping regulation and federal standardization on health insurance...."]

    Thursday, April 1, 2010 (a speech in Virginia):
    "...Every single day since I signed the reform law, there's been another poll or headline th' said--Nation still divided on health-care reform, polls haven't changed yet!  Well, yeah!  It just happened last week!  It, it's only been a week."  (There was a lot of applause, which stalled him.)  "Can you imagine if, if some of these, ah, reporters were working on a farm and...it, it, it planted some seeds, and they came out next day and they looked.  Nothing's happened.  There's no crop!
We're gonna starve!  Oh, no!  It's a disaster!  It's been a week, folks.  Ha.  So, before we find if people like health-care reform, we should wait to see what happens when we actually put into place...."  [This time, Barack Obama was clearly glib.  Barack Obama spoke as more like a child and like a what a person might expect from a U.S. President.  This statement made by Barack Obama shows that he is no serious thinker.  This statement by Barack Obama is the thinking of a child or a defective adult.  In the entry for March 29, 2010, I present part of a press release issued by the Heritage Foundation on March 30, 2010, and here is another portion of that press release: "...The President's health care law is only eight days old, and already it has cost our economy billions of dollars.  Late last week, AT&T alone took a $1 billion charge because of the impact of the bill, and the consulting firm Towers Watson told the Wall Street Journal that the total hit this year will reach nearly $14 billion.  It is sad, given the present state of our economy, that the President's party in Congress has reacted not by trying to find ways to spare the jobs that will be lost because of this law.  Instead, they are trying to intimidate companies that take such charges with threats that they will be hauled in before the Energy and Commerce Committee...."]

    Friday, April 2, 2010 (at Celgard LLC in Charlotte, North Carolina):
    "...I don't want government any more than is necessary.  But there's some things that Bob or any CEO can invest in.  Bob's not going to build the roads to get to Celgard.  No company is going to make investments for a public good...."  [Barack Obama attacked what businesses have done for decades.  Businesses have been involved in building roads; for example, a company that is putting up a big store can be involved in paying for the construction of a road that will allow people to get to the store.  Business have been involved in making parking decks, and businesses have been involved in building buildings that get use by businesses, such as, in Detroit, the famous Fisher Building.  Businesses have been involved in making roads and streets and houses for subdivisions, such as in the boom days of the 1950s.  In essence, businesses create products and services that people pay for, and those people then pay taxes, some of which go to the creation of roads.  To me, Barack Obama thinks businesses do not do anything for the public god or ever do anything for the public good, or Barack Obama is trying to make you think businesses do nothing for the public good.  See, Barack Obama's mind is filled with crap.  By the way, "public good" is what you would expect a Marxist or a communist or socialist to push in dialogue or speech, as in "for the public good."]
    "...Today is an encouraging day.  We learned that the economy actually produced a substantial number of jobs instead of losing a substantial number of jobs.  We are beginning to turn the corner.  This month, more Americans woke up, got dressed, and headed to work in an office or factory or storefront.  More folks are feeling the sense of pride and satisfaction that comes with a hard-earned and well-deserved paycheck...."  [On this day, the unemployment figures and employment figures were released by the government, and it was reported that there was an increase in the employment figure since the last report--most of those who gained jobs were those who got into part-time jobs, such as as census workers, who will be out of work in a few months, since the census jobs will disappear.]
    "...Some of my colleagues on the Republican side, what they'll say is--You got to drill even more.  Just remember this statistic--We account for two percent of the world's oil reserves, but we use twenty percent of the world's oil.  We use twenty percent, we only got two percent.  We can't drill our way out of the problem...."  [First, I am unaware how accurate the "two percent" figure is (Remember: Barack Obama is a perpetual liar).  So, forget that figure, since it is unnecessary to know at the moment.  The United States of America has control or has rights to a lot of oil, which could last for decades.  Since the 1970s, the Democrat Party has been instrumental is blocking companies in the United States of America from getting oil from lands or waters that are a part of the United States of America.  Companies around the world produce oil, and they produce the oil to sell, such as to the United States of America.  If the United States of America did not buy oil from other countries, another country would.  One reason that the United States of America uses twenty percent of the oil of the world on a yearly basis is so many other countries are not developed, having been blocked from being developed by, for instance, communist governments or Marxist governments or dictators, such as Fidel Castro of Cuba, which is a dead country.  By the way, if countries in the Middle East did not sell oil, they would not, in essence, have any industry and no other real way to gain money and grow.]
    "...We yet don't have the technological breakthroughs that can completely replace fossil fuels, so, for the next ten years, next twenty years, we're still gonna be usin' oil, we're still gonna be usin' coal, we're still gonna be using natural gas, we're still gonna usin' the traditional sources ta fuel our cars, ta heat our homes, ah, run our big power plants, et cetera...."  [Oh, really, Barack baby?]

    Friday, April 2, 2010 (in Charlotte, North Carolina):
    "..Well, well, let's talk about that...."  [A woman named Doris wondered if it was wise to add more taxes to the American public through the health-care acts in this time of a depressed economy, and the quotation that I provide in this section makes up only a small portion of what turned out to be an answer that lasted seventeen minutes and twelve seconds, and, during the long period of time, Barack Obama did not really answer what was a really short question, and I am not going to waste time showing Barack Obama's roughly seventeen-minute answer, but I do note the day on which Barack Obama gave the famous roughly seventeen-minute answer.]

    Friday, April 9, 2010 (commenting about a nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court):
    "...And so I will move quickly ta name a nominee, as I did with Justice Sotomayor.  Once again, I view the process of selecting a Supreme Court nominee as among, ah, my most serious responsibilities as President.  And while we cannot replace Justice Stevens's experience or wisdom, I will seek someone in the coming weeks with sim, similar qualities--an independent mind, a record of excellence and intrigety, a fierce dedication to the rule of law, and a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people.  It will also be someone who, like Justice Stevens, knows, in a democracy, powerful interests must not be allowed to drown the voices of ordinary citizens...."  [Barack Obama was responding to the topic that Justice John Paul Stevens of the U.S. Supreme Court was going to resign this summer.  It must be remembered that Justice John Paul Stevens will go down in history as a defective justice; for one, in 2007, he ruled, in essence, in favor of allowing the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate carbon dioxide in the country, such as the production of carbon dioxide, since carbon dioxide was deemed to be harmful to the environment, which it is not.  Now, because of the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision informally referred to, the communists and the like who are members of the federal government can control the entry industrial industry of the country through cap-and-trade ideas, such as those issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, and that will help kill the United States of America.  Now, it must be remembered the court cases should be logic puzzles in which the rule of law is followed, and, for example, when two opposing parties come before the court, the court is supposed to be impartial and make logical decisions and make decisions based on, for example, the ways of The U.S. Constitution, and the court is not supposed to rule in favor of one over the other because of feelings--as an example, I say that the court is not supposed to rule in favor the what can be called the little guy over the big guy simply to rule in favor of the little guy over the big guy (Remember: The so-called little guy can be defective or a crook or dishonorable and wish to extort something from the big guy, who can be honest and, actually, be in the right).  The size of a person or entity should not be considered by a judge when ruling on right or wrong, but Barack Obama supposedly wants a judge to take size into consideration, but it must be remembered Barack Obama hates businesses, especially big businesses.]

    Tuesday, April 13, 2010 (the final day of the nuclear-arms summit in Washington, D.C.):
    "...I think the work that we've done in recent days around nuclear security and nuclear disarmament are intrinsically good.  So many of the challenges that we face internationally can't be solved by one nation alone.  It is a vital national security interest of the United States to reduce these conflicts, ah, because whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower and when conflict break out one way or another, we get pulled into them, and that ends up costing us, ah, significantly in terms of both blood and treasure...."  [So, it seems Barack Obama does not like the United States of America being a dominant military superpower.  Notice his "...like it or not...." part.  And who are the "we" in his statement?  Are the "we" some of the people  in the country who want us to disarm, but Barack Obama cannot yet accomplish disarmament and cannot please those people in the country who support disarmament?  By the way, the nuclear-arms summit was a two-day event, which had started on Monday, April 12, 2010, and, really, nothing was accomplished during the summit (superficial stuff, such as about storing some nuclear material of other countries in the United States of America, was announced)  and, by the way, the press was not allowed at the event, probably because if the press were there, they would have really discovered nothing was useful was accomplished.  The summit was another PR show for Barack Obama--something that made it appear to the stupid that Barack Obama was doing something.]

    Thursday, April 15, 2010 (in Miami, Florida, at a fund-raising event hosted by Emilio and Gloria Estefan, the latter of whom is a famous singer):
    "...I should just point out that one-third of the Recovery Act went to tax cuts, tax cuts that strengthened the cornerstone of the American Dream...."  [I begin by letting you know you should  have no doubt that Emilio and Gloria Estefan promote Marxism, communism, socialism, and all that is Barack Obama!  Oh, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was supposed to be a jobs-creating act, but it was not, because the purpose that was stated was a lie.  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act sent money states to keep them afloat, allowing them to delay fixing their fiscal problems.  In essence, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act put the country in deeper debt, and it was and is nothing more than a slush fund for the Democratic Party and Barack Obama.]
    "...In all, we've passed twenty-five different tax cuts last year, and one thing we haven't done is raise income taxes on families making less than two-hundred-fifty-thousand dollars a year--another promised that we've kept.  So, so I've been a little amused over the last couples of days where people have been having these rallies about taxes, taxes.  You would think they would be saying, 'Thank you!'  That's what you'd think...."   [Once again, the liar spoke.  The people who have been protesting over the last number of months have known that they have been given--if not income tax increases--all other types of tax increases.  It is a fact, for example, Barack Obama has set down all types of increasing taxes through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.  Notice Barack Obama mocked the tea-party people, and notice how Barack Obama seemed to think people should be coming to his feet in gratitude.  Unfortunately for you snd me, my presentation of text in this case is unable to show his chuckling and working to draw laughter from the audience at the expense of the tea-party people.]
    "...some of my Republican friends who were warning that after health care pass--this was going to be Armageddon.  So, I went to NASA today, and, and I asked some of the guys, I said, 'Are asteroids comin' or?'   They told me, 'America's going to be okay.'...."  [Such crap this is from Barack Obama's defective mind!]
    "...And for those, ah, ah, those Republicans and dah folks who, who are on the, on the repeal platform, my attitude is--Go for it.  ...I'll have at fight.  We'll have that argument.  We'll take that argument across the country.  If they wanna let kids, if they want to let kids, ah, be barred from gettin' insurance because of pre-existing conditions, we can have that discussion.  Are they really willing to look that senior in the eye and say, 'We're not gonna help you afford that medicine?'...."  [Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009, which is the subject of the quotation, on March 23, 2010, and it is a mess and a bad piece of legislation that people--a lot of American citizens--want to have repealed.  The people who put the act together made errors that show their defectiveness--for example, the act was passed without taking care of or addressing the pre-existing conditions issue for children.  They failed!  Yet, Barack Obama attempted to push the idea through this quotation that Republicans would repeal such an issue and Barack Obama could fight them on it and win, though the issue as a provision does not exist in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009.]

    Wednesday, April 21, 2010 (a television interview with John Harwood of CNBC):
    "...It is something that has worked for some countries, and it is something that would be novel, ah, for the United States, and before, you know, I started saying, 'This makes sense or that makes sense,' I want to get a better picture of what our options are, and my first priority is to figure out how can we reduce wasteful spending so that, you know, we have a baseline of the core services that we need and the government should provide, and then we decide--How do we pay for that?--as oppose to figurin' out--How much money can we raise?--and then, ah, not have to make some tough choices on the spending side...."  [The topic was a "value-added tax" and could it come, and Barack Obama came up with this defective statement.  I know a value-added tax would increase the taxes on everyone, especially the poor and middle class, and a value-added tax is a defective tax, which will hurt the economy and hinder the making of things in this country.  In truth, Barack Obama's pushing for a value-added tax is pushing to put more industries and jobs of the U.S. in other countries.]

    Thursday, April 22, 2010 (at The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, New York City, New York):
    "...I believe in the power of the 'free market.'  I believe in a strong financial sector that helps people to raise capital and get loans and invest their savings, part of what has made America what it is.  But the free market was never meant to be a free license to take whatever you can get however you can get it...."  [The 'free market' has never been something in which you take 'whatever you can get however you can get it.'  For one, the 'free market' as it has been in the United States of America for a long time is regulated by laws, such as state laws and such federal laws as the Truth and Lending Act, and, in the 'free market,' business people and customers in the millions negotiate deals and contacts in the millions every day, and customers can buy or not buy, and businesses cannot get away with whatever, because if they try to do whatever, which Barack Obama seems to hint is unethical all the time, customers would not buy, killing the businesses.  I sort of think Barack Obama thinks the marketplace is "free" when government controls the entire marketplace so that everyone is free to do business--only in a way that the government wants.]
    "...Too often in the years leading up to this crisis, some--and let me be clear--not all but some on Wall Street forgot that behind every dollar traded or leveraged, there's a family looking to buy a house or pay for an education, open a business, save for retirement...."   [Wrong!  The economic crisis was precipitated by federal-government law or rules.  In the case of trading stocks and bonds on Wall Street, prices are set by the market forces, and people decide to buy or not buy, and there is a risk to any investment, and if a person dealing in the stock market gains money, some other loses money.  Generally speaking, when a person makes a stock-market action, such as if I were to buy stock in typerwriter-making company, the action does not affect some other person's world of buying a house or paying for an education or setting up a business or saving for retirement.  Really, Barack Obama's two ideas--"behind every dollar traded or leveraged" and "there's a family looking to buy a house or pay for an education, open a business, save for retirement"--are unrelated.]
    "...The system as it stands is what led to a series of massive costly taxpayer bailouts, and it's only with reform that we can avoid a similar outcome in the future.  In other words, a vote for reform is a vote to put a stop to taxpayer-funded bailouts, and that's the truth...."  [Liar!  Remember: Barack Obama is a perpetual liar, as is shown in this document.  It is very unlikely the federal government would not get involved in bailouts in the future.  In any case, the financial reform that Barack Obama is really pushing for is that in which the federal government controls the entire financial industry of the country and can at a whim take over financial institutions, which you can learn about by reading my document entitled Barack Obama's Banks: Congress, Give Me the Power, and I Will Control All of Them, which can be reached by using this link: Banks.]
    "...Markets operated in the shadows of our economy, invisible to regulators, invisible to the public, so reckless practices were rampant, risks accrued until they threatened our entire financial system.  That's why these reforms are designed to respect legitimate activities but prevent reckless risk-taking...."  [Barack Obama passed along a lot of crap in this statement.  What is "reckless risk-taking" to Barack Obama?  What are "legitimate activities" for Barack Obama?  In life, an individual who does anything must determine what risks are involved, and one person may have a higher tolerance for risk than another person has, or one person is very likely to have a different tolerance for risk than another person has, and some people rarely take a risk, and those people achieve nothing.]
    "...These Wall Street reforms will give shareholders new power in the financial system.  They will get what we call 'a say on pay,' a voice with respect to the salaries and bonuses awarded the top executives. Americans don't begrudge anybody for success when that success is earned. When we read in the past and sometimes in the present about the enormous executive bonuses at firms, even as they're relying on assistance from taxpayers or they're taking huge risks that threaten the system as a whole or their company's doing badly, it offends our fundamental values...."  [Ugh!  Oh, if Barack Obama gets to the power to take over any financial institution at a whim, whatever new powers that shareholders will supposedly ended up with through a financial-reform act will be trumped all the time by the federal government, because the federal government is not going to give up control to shareholders, wanting all the power.  Anyway, in companies with shareholders who can propose things to adopt and who can vote on proposals, shareholders can affect the pay of executives, and the marketplace affects the pay of executives and all people who work.]
    Note: April 22, 2010--this day was the day in which new rules about renovating and rebuilding houses built before 1978 went into effect (supposedly the rules were set up because of existing lead paint in buildings).  For example, contractors or workers who work on houses have spend money and attend a one-day course (the Remodelers, Renovators, and Painters Course) to get certified in relation to new the EPA rules.  For any violation, a contractor or worker can be fined up to $37,500.  Of course, the rules increase the costs of renovating and rebuilding houses to homeowners, since costs get passed on to customers.

    Friday, April 23, 2010 (a statement to the press about new immigration rules for police in Arizona):
    "...Indeed, our failure to act responsibly at the federal level will only open the door to irresponsibility by others.  That includes, for example, the recent efforts in Arizona, which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe.  In fact, I've instructed members of my administration to closely monitor the situation and the civil rights and other implications of this legislation, but if we continue to fail to act at a federal level, we will see misguided efforts opening up around the country.  As a nation, as a people, we can choose a different future, a future that keeps faith with our history, with our heritage, and with hope that America has always inspired in hearts of over the world...."  [In Arizona, U.S. citizens, which include police officers, plumbers, ranchers, et cetera, are having trouble with illegal aliens from Mexico and with gangs involved in the illegal-drug trade, and the citizens want to fight back and get their state under control; by the way, recently, the citizens of Arizona have been having trouble with big-time crimes, such as the killing of a rancher (a man named Robert Krentz) in March 2010, and politicians, police officers, and others have been calling for U.S. troops to be stationed at the border between Mexico and at least Arizona.  It has been widely known that Barack Obama and the Democrats in the U.S. Congress want to pass immigration reform soon or "quickly," which will allow illegal aliens in this country to become, in essence, instant citizens of the country (Barack Obama and his associates have already given illegal aliens--through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010--medical care, and now illegal aliens from anywhere can come in to the country and get free medical care, which is going to help destroy the United States of America.  Through the set of words from Barack Obama that make up this section, you can see Barack Obama cares more about illegal aliens, especially those from Mexico and Latin America, than the real citizens of the United States of America (or, simply, the United States of America).   He has not sent troops to the border between the United States of America and Mexico to protect the people of the United States of America.  By the way, the United States of America has had immigration laws going back to the early decades of this country--you cannot let just anybody in, as Barack Obama wants to do, because, for one, you will economically destroy the country or you will bankrupt the country (other people of countries have rules about who can and who cannot come in to their countries).  It is also clear Barack Obama cares more for illegal aliens than for true U.S. citizens (such as those born here or those who are naturalized citizens) through a statement that he made in Georgia during a speech on July 8, 2008, a part of which was "...you need to make sure your children can speak Spanish...." (Note: See the section called "P.S. #4:" below).  If you look at the material spoken by Barack Obama in this section, you will see that Barack Obama cares more for the "civil rights" of illegal aliens (the persons who are in the country illegally) than the true citizens of the country, and you can see that Barack Obama sees the people in Arizona as "misguided."  On this day--April 23, 2010--the State of Arizona passed a law in which police were given more powers to deal with illegal aliens, and I say, "That is the way it should be."  Illegal aliens are, in essence, citizens of other countries who are violating the laws of the United States of America.  Incidentally, go to some other country--there, you will discover you have no United States of America rights anymore and you are subject to all the laws of that country and all the defective ways of that country.  In addition, Barack Obama said that "...we can choose a different future...."  What is a "different future" to Barack Obama?  I want, as you should, a future in which people from other countries who are illegally in this country are dealt with under the laws of the United States of America.  It seems to me Barack Obama will never define what a "different future" really means, because you would probably dislike it.  It does seem to me his "different future" isn one in which the United States of America has open borders--which allow anyone to come in at anytime and to get free stuff.  Remember: Since the 1800s, the United States of America has had various immigration laws that it has enforced and used to allow only some people into the country, such as those without bad diseases or those who have no bad criminal backgrounds.]
    Note: Be sure to see the entry for Tuesday, April 27, 2010.

    Monday, April 26, 2010 (video message for the entity known as Organizing for America, a highly left-wing activitist group focusing on Barack Obama):
    "...This year, we're gonna reconnect with voters like Claudia Schultz*.  At twenty-nine years old, Claudia had never been involved in the political process because she didn't think one person could make a difference, but, in 2008, Claudia joined millions of other supporters like you and made her first-ever trip to the polls.  In 2010, it will be up to each of you to ask folks like Claudia to stay involved and to explain why this year the stakes are higher than ever.  It will be up to each of you to make sure that the young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 stand together once again.  It will be up to each of you to keep our nation moving forward and to keep building a fairer and stronger and more just America...."  [You should see through Barack Obama's saying 'more just America' that Barack Obama has little respect for the United States of America.  To Barack Obama, the United States of America must be such a terrible place.  *Note: I may have the spelling of this woman incorrect.]

    Tuesday, April 27, 2010 (at a town-hall meeting in Ottumawa, Iowa):
    "...But, now, suddenly, if you don't have your papers, and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you're going to be harassed.  That's something that could potentially happen.  I, I, that's not the right way to go...."  [The subject in Barack Obama's mind was Hispanic Americans and the new immigration law enacted in Arizona, which was not scheduled to go into effect until the summer of 2010.  What Barack Obama did through this statement was "race bait."  Yes, a U.S. President was purposely working to stir up racial hate or make people of Spanish descent become angry!  The new law in Arizona is designed to give police more powers to deal with illegal aliens in Arizona, but the law does not allow police in Arizona to approach people solely on race and do anything that can be thought of as "racial profiling," but Barack Obama--the such a piece of garbage of a man--put forth the argument that Hispanic Americans now are going to be treated as criminals or now have to worry that the police are going to harass them, and that is not true.  By the way, "Hispanic Americans" are citizens of the United States of America, and such individuals have nothing to worry about, since they can prove they are citizens of the country, having, for example, mostly likely, a valid license to drive or a voter-registration card.  It must be remembered the citizens of Arizona--one the states of the United States of America--is getting no help from Barack Obama with the problems of illegal aliens, such as drug smugglers and killers, and the citizens of Arizona are trying to protect themselves from such persons as the drug smugglers and killers who have brought their drug wars and other crimes to Arizona.]
    Note: Be sure to see the entry for Friday, April 23, 2010.

    Friday, April 30, 2010 (a press event in the Rose Garden of the Capitol in Washington, D.C., focusing on the oil-rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico):
    "...I have dispatched the Secretaries of Interior and Homeland Security, as well as the administrator of the EPA, my assistant for Energy and Climate Change Policy, and, ah, the NOAA administrator to the Gulf Coast to ensure that we continue to do everything necessary to respond to this event, and I expect their reports from the ground today.  As I said yesterday, BP is ultimately responsible under the law for paying the cost of response and clean-up operations, but we are fully prepared to meet our responsibilities to any and all affected communities, and that's why we've been working closely with state and local authorities since the day of the explosion.  I've ordered Secretary Salazar to conduct a thorough review of this incident and report back to me in thirty days on what if any additional precautions and technologies should be required to prevent accidents like this from happening again...."  [Ugh!  On April 20, 2010, an oil rig blew up in the Gulf of Mexico, somewhere near Louisiana, and, on April 30, 2010, Barack Obama held his second press event about the incident (he had made a statement on Thursday, April 29, 2010), and only at this time did it really seem Barack Obama was getting involved and mobilizing anybody.  By the way, the Energy and Climate Change Policy position is one of the many, many "czar" positions in the Obama administration, each of which is an unelected position and a position involving no U.S. Congress confirmation process, and each person in a "czar" position gets paid something or other to do something or other.  On Friday, April 30, 2010, news entities reported that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was sending attorneys of the U.S. Department of Justice to the area of the oil-rig explosion (Vicini, James, and Jeremy Pelofsky.  "UPDATE 1-US Justice Dept sends team to monitor oil spill."  Reuters, 30 April 2010.);  up to this point, there had been no news stories about Barack Obama's having called for a big mobilization of Navy or U.S. Coast Guard ships or whatever to help out in the area of the destroyed oil rig.  Commentary: I have to say this--I am aware Barack Obama wants to damage the United States of America, and I would not be surprised if Barack Obama, since the explosion, had been stalling on do anything about the incident so that oil would actually get to U.S. beaches in the Gulf of Mexico and damage beaches and Barack Obama could use the disaster to put more holds on the drilling of oil in waters associated with the United States of America (I know Barack Obama is a defective man and evil man).]

    Saturday, May 1, 2010 (at the Commencement Event for the Class of 2010 of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan):
    "...Now, some of this contentiousness can be attributed to the incredibly difficult moment in which we find ourselves as a nation.  The fact is, when you leave here today, you will search for work in an economy that is still emerging from the worst crisis since the Great Depression.  You live in a century where the speed with which jobs and industries move across the global that's forcing America to compete like never before.  You'll raise your children at a time when threats like terrorism and climate change aren't confined within the borders of any one country...."   [Generally speaking, the entire event, which had such speakers as Jennifer Granholm (the governor of Michigan) and the president of the university, was a socialism-themed event, especially as shown by the speech given by a dean of the university, Dean McDonald, and much of the event focused on Barack Obama, who gave another indoctrination speech, as I will be show through all the examples of statements from his speech presented in this section, and there were lies, as can be seen by Barack Obama's pushing the lie of "climate change" as a threat through this set of sentences from Barack Obama.]
    "...If you enter the arena [of politics], you should expect to get roughed up.  Moreover, democracy in a nation of more than three-hundred-million people is inherently difficult.  It's always been noisy and messy, contentious, complicated.  We've been fighting about the proper size and role of government since the days the framers gathered in Philadelphia  We've battled over the meaning of individual freedom and equality since the Bills of Rights was drafted...."  [We have not "battled over the meaning of individual freedom and equality."  It is, for example, the Bills of Rights that define rights of the individual and define freedoms.   There should be no battle now about "individual freedom and equality."  The battle should be to preserve "individual freedom and equality" as presented in, for example, The U.S. Constitution, which lately has been trampled on by Barack Obama, such as by enacting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.]
    "...The truth is the debate we've had for decades now between more government and less government, it's doesn't really fit the times in which we live.  We know too much government can stifle competition and deprive us of choice and burden us with debt.  But we've also clearly seen the dangers of too little government, like when a lack of accountability on Wall Street nearly leads to the collapse of our entire economy...."  [And the crowd like willing sheep gave a long applause, though what they had heard about "too little government" was a lie, given that the federal government was instrumental in causing the economic collapse of 2008.]
    "...So, Class of 2010, what we should be asking is not whether we need big government of a small government, but how we can create a smarter and better government...."  [We do not need to create "a smarter and better government,"  as Barack Obama promotes.  The basis for the federal government is well designed through The U.S. Constitution.  But is is clear, through statements made by Barack Obama in the past, that Barack Obama does not like the former of government that the United States of America has.  What is "a smarter and better government" to Barack Obama?  It does seems that Barack Obama sees himself as a really smart man, so it looks as if "a smarter and better government" to him is him.]
    "...Government shouldn't try to dictate your lives, but it should give you the tools you need to succeed...."  [Okay.  Think!  What "tools" should the government give to people?  What are the "tools" that you need to succeed?  Government cannot determine what you need to succeed, because, for one, what a person hopes to be may not be what really would lead to a person's achieving success (and, anyway, what is success for one person may not be success for another person).  The government cannot predict how well you will do in life and when you will succeed (if you ever succeed).  Yet, if you buy Barack Obama's argument, you think you have to wait for the government to give you the "tools."  In life, you have to learn what tools you need and get them or find them.  Each person is very likely to have a slightly different collection of "tools" or skills, and, generally speaking, a person has to develop skills or tools through practice and work and trial and error.]
    "...You can disagree with a certain policy without demonizing the person who espouses it.  You can question somebody's views and their judgment without questioning their motives or their patriotism.  Throwing around phrases like 'socialist,' 'Soviet-style takeover,' and 'fascist' and 'right-wing nut,' that may grab headlines, but it also has the effect of comparing our government, our political opponents to authoritarian, even murderous regimes.  Now, we've seen this kind of politics in the past.  It's been practiced by both fringes of the ideological spectrum--by the left and the right--since our nation's birth, but it's starting to creep into the center of our discourse.  And the problem with it is not the hurt feelings and the bruised egos of the public officials who are criticized.  Remember, they've signed up for it.  Michelle always reminds me of that.   The problem is that this kind of vilification and over-the-top rhetoric closes the door to the possibility of compromise.  It undermines democratic deliberation.  It prevents learning, since, after all, why should be listen to a fascist or a socialist or a right-wing nut or a left-wing nut.  It makes it nearly impossible for people who have legitimate but bridgeable differences to sit down at the same table and hash things out.  It robs us of a rational and serious debate--the one we need to have about the very real and very big challenges facing this nation...."  [Two persons can disagree on all types of matters, but in some matters, there should be no compromising.  A person may compromise on the color or type of car to buy, and a person may compromise on what to have for dinner, but, a person should not compromise and give into the ways of socialism, communism, fascism, and such.  History shows that socialism, communism, fascism, and such are bad for the individual, and they are variations of totalitarianism!  Here, Barack Obama, who is most certainly a communist and more, worked to make the audience think about forgetting socialism, communism, fascism, and such as bad so that the audience will be more receptive to persons who push such ideas and be willing to compromise with such persons.  You cannot compromise with a crazy person or a crazy man, and you cannot give up freedom to compromise with those who promote socialism, communism, fascism, and the like.  The United States of America is not based on socialism, communism, fascism, and such, so why would you want to compromise your better principles for those of the socialist, the communist, the fascist, and such.  Keep in mind: You do not avoid calling a person what the person is, and if  the person is, for example, a communist, which is not a good person, should be called a communist, and, remember, the "right-wing nut" as hinted at by Barack Obama is the "conservative," the person who upholds the ways of The U.S. Constitution.]
    "...If, if electoral politics isn't your thing, continue the tradition so many of you started here at Michigan and find a way to serve your community and country--an act that will help you stay connected to your fellow citizens and improve the lives of those around you...."  [By the way, Barack Obama's idea of serving the community is to work for the "common good," that theme promoted by the Marxist (such as the communist) and defined and set daily by the Marxist politician.]

    Tuesday, May 4, 2010:
    "...It has failed because ordinary citizens were vigilant and reported suspicious activity to authorities.  It failed because these authorities--local, state, and federal--acted quickly and did what they're trained to do...."  [Barack Obama was referring to the terrorist's attempt to set off a bomb in Times Square in New York City, New York, on Saturday, May 1, 2010, which failed because the terrorist failed.]
    "...I've said, since the very beginning of my administration, we can't just rebuild the economy to where it was, we're gonna have to rebuild it stronger than before.  We got to rebuild it on a new foundation of lasting growth!  We have to tackle structural problems from education to energy, from our financial system to our health-care system, from our trade imbalance to our fiscal imbalance...."  [No government can build an economy that will always have "lasting growth."  Again, Barack Obama simply ran off the mouth!  And, anyway, no government entity is smart enough to control the business done by millions and millions of persons on a daily basis and make things work out well.]
    "...Government can build the infrastructure that allows products and services to reach cus, ah, customers.  Government can create incentives and clean energy, for example, and promote innovation and exports.  This things are public goods that no business, no individual is gonna provide on their own...."  [This set of words from Barack Obama is more crap.  For more than two-hundred years, individuals and businesses have created things and whatever without the help of government, and, in fact, government has been rarely involved; the individuals and businesses have seen opportunities to fix problems, deal with life, make life better, et cetera, and the individuals and businesses--which have to do something in life, because that is the way of life--create and build.  Again, Barack Obama put down individuals who create businesses and put down private businesses in general, but that is the way of a man with hate in his mind for the United States of America, which is not a haven for communists to easily work to hurt other persons and control other persons.]

    Wednesday, May 5, 2010 (on the Spanish-type holiday called "Cinco de Mayo"):
    "...The answer isn't to undermine fundamental principles that define us as a nation.  We can't start singling out people because of who they look like or how they talk or how they dress.  We can't turn law-abiding Americans citizens and law-abiding immigrants into subjects suspicion and abuse.  We can't divide the American people that way.  That's not the answer, that's not who we are as the United States of America...."  [The subject is really the new immigration-type law enacted in Arizona, which is a law that helps police in Arizona deal with illegal aliens.  America is made up of people of all types of races.  The new law in Arizona is not one that is specific to a certain race of people; it is a law related to illegal aliens, who are people who are in the country illegally (they are violating laws in the United States of America about being in the country, which are, in essence, like laws about illegal aliens that all countries have).  Here, Barack Obama was trying to suggest the new law is designed to go after certain types of people, and what was implied is Spanish-type persons, hoping, it seems to me, to rile up Spanish-type people in the country, especially in Arizona.  The new law in Arizona is not designed to allow abuse of "law-abiding American citizens and law-abiding immigrants."  It can be argued well by me that Barack Obama purposely did "racing baiting" by speaking these words.]

    Friday, May 7, 2010 (the day that unemployment statistics were released):
    "...From the first days of this administration, amidst the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, I've said that the truest measure of progress would be whether or not we were creating jobs.  Today, I'm happy to report that we received encouraging news. In April, the economy added two-hundred-and-ninty-thousand jobs, with the vast majority--approximately two-hundred-thirty-thousand--coming from the private section.  This is the largest monthly increase in four years, and we created a hundred-twenty-one-thousand more jobs in February and March than previously estimated, which means we've now seen job growth for four months in a row.  These numbers are particularly heartening when you consider where we were a year ago with an economy in free fall..."  [This section has four main blocks of material from Barack Obama, and when you study this section, keep in mind that general unemployment rate went up, going up a bit to 9.9 percent, and the "U6" unemployment rate went up a bit, going to 17.1 percent, so, really, it was the general unemployment rate that when up and the full-feature unemployment rate that went up (the latter of which takes into account, for example, people who work part time and are looking for full-time employment), and both figures showed increases even though a tens of thousands people became employed with the government to do census work.]
    "...I should also note the unemployment rate ticked up slightly from 9.7 to 9.9.  Given the strength of these jobs numbers, this may seem contradictory, but this increase is largely a reflection of the fact that workers who had dropped out of the work force entirely are now seeing jobs again--and are now seeking jobs again--ah, encouraged by better prospects...."
    "...I want to speak to the unusual market activity that took place yesterday on Wall Street.  The regulatory authorities are evaluating this closely with a concern for protecting investors and preventing this from happening again, and they will make findings of their review public along with recommendations for appropriate action.  I also spoke this morning with German Chancellor Merkel regarding economic and financial developments in Europe.  We agreed on the importance of a strong policy response by the affected countries and a strong financial response from the international community.  I made clear that the United States supports these efforts and will continue to cooperate...."  [Note: On May 6, 2010, the Dow Jones Industrial Average went down, achieving at one point a drop of 998 points and going down 700 points during one fifteen-minute period, and, at the end of the day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average went down 347.90 points over the closing figure of the previous day.]
    "...So, yes, we've got a ways to go, ah, but we've also come a very long way, and we can see that the difficult and at times unpopular steps that we've taken over the past year are making a difference...."  [I very, very, very informally ask--What'd dat guy say?]

    Sunday, May 9, 2010 (at Hampton University, Hampton, Virginia, for a commencement speech):
    "...You are coming of age in a twenty-four-seven media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don't always rank that high on the truth meter.  And with iPods and IPads and Xboxes and PlayStations--none of which I know how to work--information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than a means of epancipation [emancipation].  So, all of this is not only putting pressure on you, it's putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy...."  [I note to begin with that Xboxes and PlayStations are not information devices--they are game machines, and they can be discounted as sources of information.  You have before you a very, very long document that displays what I will call here countless lies uttered by Barack Obama, yet Barack Obama, here, talked about a "truth meter."  Truthful and useful information is not a form of entertainment, and truthful and useful information does not put new pressure on, for example, "our democracy."]
    "...With so many voices clamoring for attention on blogs, and on cable, on talk radio, it can be difficult, at times, to sift through it all, to know what to believe, ta figure out who's tellin' the truth and who's not.  Let's face it, even some of the craziest claims can quickly gra, gain traction.  I've had some experience, ah, in that regard...."  [Knowing what I do about Detroit, Michigan, and how Detroit has evolved into a "Dead City" since the 1970s, I will say that Barack Obama came to this university so that he could work to keep black men and black women misinformed and enslaved to him.  Within the past year or so, the Barack Obama administration has attacked and even urged people to stop paying attention to such entities or persons as Rush Limbaugh and the Fox News Channel.  Yes, Barack Obama was trying to put down his opponents in the media so that the students might avoid them and listen more to him.]

    Friday, May 14, 2010 (the topic was the oil-rig leak in the Gulf of Mexico):
    "...Let me tell you it is in anger and frustration that I share as President, and I'm not going to rest or be satisfied until the leak is stopped at the source, the oil in the Gulf is contained and cleaned up, and the people of the Gulf are able to go back to their lives and their livelihoods...."  [Hurray!  (I said that word in jest.)  Barack Obama is taking up the fight, and Barack Obama will not rest.  Yet it must be remembered that, after the oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, it took him about eight days to even talk about the oil-rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico (and, by the way, I have yet to hear Barack Obama talk about the men who died in the disaster, and several weeks after the oil-rig explosion took place, a big flood--if not a "historic" flood--hit western Tennessee, and Barack Obama had little to say about it publicly.]
    "...I know BP is committed to pay for the response effort, and we will hold them to their obligation.  I have to say, though, that I did not appreciate, ah, what I consider to be a ridiculous spectacle, ah, during the Congressional hearings into this matter.  Yet, executives of BP and Transocean and Halliburton falling over each other to point the finger of blame at somebody else.  The American people could not have been impressed with that display.  And I certainly wasn't!...."  [On May 11, 2010, executives of British Petroleum (or BP), Transocean, and Halliburton appeared at a U.S. Senate hearing.  Here, you can see that the dictator--Barack Obama--was not pleased with what had happened at the hearing, which I say was nothing more than a media show.  It seems very unlikely to me that the Barack Obama administration was not involved in making sure the executives were sort of put on trial in the hearing before the public.  Ask yourself--What was accomplished by having the hearing?  Incidentally, on May 14, 2010, the oil leak was not yet stopped. Ask yourself--Would it have not been better for the executives to be working on the problem than be in a U.S. Senate hearing on this date?]
    "...And for that, there is enough responsibility to go around, and all parties should be willing to accept it.  That includes, by the way, the federal government.  For too long--for a decade or more--there's been a cozy relationship between the oil companies and the federal agency that permits them to drill.  Seems as if permits were too often issued based on little more than assurances of safety from the oil companies.  That cannot and will not happen anymore...."  [For many years, the oil industry--such as the oil-drilling segment of the industry--has been highly regulated, and there have been few disasters, considering how much oil drilling is going on and has been going on, as you can discover by doing research.  You should see Barack Obama implied that the oil industry has been poorly regulated over the last decade or so, which was mostly during the time of the U.S. President George Bush administration, one member of whom was Dick Cheney (who was the U.S. Vice President), who, during one period of his life, worked for Halliburton.]
    "...The oil companies share it.  The manufacturers of this equipment share it.  The agencies in the federal government in charge of oversight share that responsibility.  I will not tolerate more finger pointing or irresponsibility!...."   [Yes, here, through this set of words, Barack Obama showed that he was putting his foot down and would not 'tolerate' any more finger pointing and irresponsibility.  I ask in jest--Are you not impressed?]

    Wednesday, May 19, 2010 (a press conference in the Rose Garden of the White House with the President of Mexico, Felipe Calderon):
    "...We also discussed a new law in Arizona, which is a misdirected effort, a misdirected expression of frustration over our broken immigration system and which has raised concerns in both of our countries.  Illegal immigration is down and up, and we will continue to do what's necessary to secure our shared border.  And I want everyone--American and Mexican--to know my administration is taking a very close at the Arizona law.  We're examining any implications, especially or civil rights, because, in the United States of America, no law-abiding person, be they an American citizen a legal immigrant or a visitor or tourist from Mexico, should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like...."  [The law to which Barack Obama referred is the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act, which had been signed into law in Arizona on April 23,  2010.  It is a law that, in essence, restates federal law, which, for one, the Barack Obama administration has not been enforcing well over the last year at least.  Here, besides lying about what the law is, Barack Obama orally attacked the citizens of Arizona, even though the citizens are having great problems with illegal aliens, such as drug smugglers, as the citizens have been for well over a decade. (You are urged to see my document entitled Illegal Aliens and Immigration: The Focus is Protecting the Home--The United States of America, which can be reached by using this link: Illegal.)]
    "...A fair reading of the language of the statute indicates that it gives the possibility of individuals who are deemed suspicious of being illegal aliens from being harassed or arrested, and the judgments that are going to be made in applying this law are troublesome...."  [Ask yourself--To Barack Obama, what is a "fair reading" of something?  To Barack Obama, a law that blocks illegal immigrants from coming in to the country and staying in the country must indeed be "troublesome."  And, oh, yes, Barack Obama lied again, such as by saying the law has been designed allow police to possibly harass people.]
    "...To fix our broken immigration system, I reaffirmed my deep commitment to working with Congress in a bipartisan way to pass comprehensive immigration reform.  Comprehensive reform means accountability for everybody--government that is accountable for securing the border, businesses being held accountable when they exploit workers, people who break the law by breaching our borders being held accountable by paying taxes...."  [Notice how Barack Obama pushed the idea of not sending illegal aliens out of the country or putting them in jail, as happens in Mexico, but forcing them to pay taxes, and it seems to me Barack Obama would allow illegal aliens to stay in the country and allow illegal aliens to keep entering the country unchecked!]
    "...The second thing we got to do is we've got to make sure businesses are following the rules and are not actively recruiting undocumented workers so that they don't have ta abide by overtime laws, they don't have to abide by minimum-wage laws, they don't have to abide by worker-safety laws, and otherwise undercut basic worker protections that exist, ah, and they have to be held accountable and responsible...."  [Federal law in the United States of America requires people from other countries--foreigners of whatever kind--who are in the United States of America to carry "papers" or I.D. papers, and since April 23, 2010, I have heard some prominent people imply it is so horrible that people from other countries have to carry "papers."   If the government does not press the issue that foreigners must carry "papers, how can businesses prove who people are and whether or not people are illegal aliens?  Remember: Illegal aliens are lawbreakers.]

    Friday, May 21, 2010 (at the signing of another piece of paper, another order, another something--this time about fuel-efficiency standards):
    "...We know that our dependence on foreign oil endangers our security and economy.  We know that climate change poses a threat to our way of life.  In fact, we're already seeing some of the profound and costly impacts.  And the disaster in the Gulf only underscores that, even as we pursue domestic production to reduce our reliance on imported oil, our long-term security depends on the development of alternative soarches of fuel and new transportation technologies...."  [I use "soarches" because it sounded like that.  It seems Barack Obama wanted to say the word "sources."  Barack Obama goofed!  Oh, what Barack Obama said was a set of useless words.]
    "...Today, we're supporting the development of advance battery technologies.  We're doubling the capacity to generate renewable electricity.  We're building a stronger, smarter electric grid, which will be essential ta powering the millions of plug-in hybrids and, ah, cars and trucks that we hope to see on the roads...."  [Here, what we were given is just empty words, but if you want to see A Collection of Words--Just Words--That Show Dangerous People, use this link: Words.]

    On Monday, May 24, 2010 (on graduating day for at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York):
    "...We have to shape an international order that can meet the challenges of our generation.  We will be steadfast and strengthening those old alliances that have served us so well, including those who will serve by your side in Afghanistan and around the globe.  As influence extends to more countries and capitals, we also have to build more partnerships and shape stronger international standards and institutions.  This engagement is not an end in itself.  The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times, countering violent extremism and insurgence, stopping the spread of nuclear weapons, securing nuclear materials, combating and changing climate, and sustaining global growth, helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick, preventing conflict, and healing wounds...."  [Yes, Barack Obama did say this nonsense to the graduating class at the United States Military Academy, even though Barack Obama has been giving at least one ally the cold shoulder--Israel.  Ask yourself--What is the new "international order" that rests in Barack Obama's mind?  And in jest I say, "It seems Barack Obama is going to send the troops out to fight global warming, and, maybe, he will give the troops hand-held fans to fan the air and cool it down."]

    On Tuesday, May 25, 2010 (at a fund-raiser in San Francisco for U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, a Democrat):
    "...Nobody, ah, is more upset than me, because, ultimately, like any President, when this happens on your watch, then every day you are thinking--How does this get solved?...."  [Barack Obama was referring to the oil-rig disaster of the Gulf of Mexico, which had started on April 20, 2010, and, so far, Barack Obama has not really done much in relation to the incident.]

    On Wednesday, May 26, 2010 (a solar-panel manufacturing plant in California):
    "...Earlier today, I spoke ta Energy Secretary Steve Chu, who as you know is a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, and he's been on the scene in the Gulf, deeply involved in our efforts to bring this crisis to an end, and we discussed today's attempt to stop the leak.  If it's successful--and there're no guarantees--it should greatly reduce or eliminate the flow of oil now streaming in to the Gulf from the sea floor...."  [Wow!  Barack Obama sent a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, who is not normally involved in plugging holes, especially a hole that is in deep water, to the Gulf of Mexico.  Oh, Barack Obama has a Nobel Prize.  Wow!  I say in jest, "We have two Nobel Prize-winning geniuses working on the problem, and I am so impressed!"  Oh, what does Barack Obama know about capping an oil leak?]
    "...My administration is intensively engaged with scientists and engineers ta explore all alternative options, and we're going to bring every resource necessary to put a stop to this thing.  A lot  of damage has been done already--livelihoods destroyed, landscapes scarred, wildlife affected, lives have been lost.  Our thoughts and prayers are very much with people along the Gulf Coast.  Let me reiterate--we will not rest until this well is shut, and the cleanup is complete...."  [Liar!]
    "...Even as we are dealing with this immediate crisis, we've got to remember that the risks our dependence on oil holds holds for our environment and our coast communities is not the only cost involved in our dependence on these fossils fuels.  Around the world, from China to Germany, our competitors are waging a historic effort to lead in developing new energy technologies.  They're factories like this being built in China.  Factories like this being built in Germany...."  [By the way, on this day, workers who had been building a new plant close by were given the day off without pay, as was noted in a television reported done by a reporter of KRON-TV, and they were told to take the day off for security reasons related to Barack Obama.]

    Thursday, May 27, 2010 (a press conference):
    "...When I woke up this morning, ah, and I'm shavin', and Malia knocks on my bathroom door and she peaks in her head, and she says, ah, ah, 'Did ya plug the hole yet, daddy?...."  [This may or may not be a lie--I bet on a lie--but it surely is something that can make a listener gag!]
    "...The day that the rig collapsed and fell to the bottom of the ocean, I had my team in the oval office that first day.  Those who think that we were either slow on our response or lacked urgency don't know the facts.  This has been our highest priority since this crisis occurred.  We understood from day one the potential enormity of this crisis and acted accordingly.  People are gonna be frustrated until it stops. And I understand that.  If you're livin' on the coasts, and you see this sludge comin' at you, you're going to be continually upset, and from your perspective, the response is going to be continually inadequate until it actually stops.  That's entirely appropriate...." [So, the team got together on the first day, but it took about eight days before Barack Obama made any good public comment on the event.  Oh, I guess to Barack Obama thought that this event was so important that he felt it unnecessary to talk about the very bad flooding that hit Tennessee, such as at Nashville, a few days after the oil-rig had exploded.]
    "...The American people should know that, from the moment that this disaster began, the federal government has been in charge of the response effort...."  [Do you believe what Barack Obama said?]
    "...This notion that somehow the federal government is sitting on the sidelines and for the last three or four or five weeks, we've just been letting BP make a whole bunch of decisions is simply not true.  What is true is that, when it comes to stopping the leak down below, the federal government does not possess superior technology to BP.  We had a meeting down in the situation in which I specifically asked Bob Gates and Mike Mullen what assets do we have to potential help that BP or oil companies around the world do not have.  We do not have superior technology when it comes to dealing with particular crisis.  Now, one of the legitimate questions that I think to be asked is--Should the federal government have such a capacity?...."  [Yes, the federal government may not have superior technology to stop the leak, but it does have the ability to mobilize people and equipment to deal with the oil that has escaped and is, for example, on the surface of the water, and the federal government can find ways to bring in equipment from other nations to help out.]
    "...Let's take the example of Governor Jindal's barrier islands idea.  When I met with him when I was down there two weeks ago, I said, 'I will make sure that our team immediately reviews this idea.'   The Army Corps of Engineers is looking at the feasibility of it, and if they think, if they tell me that this is the best approach to dealing with this problem, then we're goin' move quickly to execute.  If they have a disagreement with Governor Jindal's experts as to whether this would be effective or not, whether it was going to be cost effective given the other things that need to be done.  Then, we'll sit down a try to figure that out.  And that's essentially what's happened, which is why today you saw an announcement where from the Army Corps perspective, there were some areas where this might work, but there's some areas where it would be counter productive and not a good use of resources...."    [This answer was in response to a question that had been asked by Jake Tapper of ABC News), who, for one, noted that Barack Obama said that everything that can be done is being done, but some people say that the federal government has been at least lax.  The "Jindal" referred to by Barack Obama is Bobby Jindal, who is the governor of Louisiana.  Notice that Barack Obama mentioned "cost effective" in his statement.  When the goal is to stop oil from getting to shores of the Gulf of Mexico, what is not cost effective?  And Barack Obama hinted that at some places Bobby Jindal's plan to set up island barriers would be useful.  Why not use Bobby Jindal's plan where it would be useful, instead of doing nothing?]
    "...With respect to Ms. Birnbaum, I found out about her resignation today.  Ken Salazar has been in testimony, ah, throughout the day, so I don't know the circumstances in which this occurred...."  [This statement is related to news that Elizabeth Birnbaum of MMS resigned.]
    "...We did.  Part of the problem we've got is--let's take that example of boom--ah, the way the plans have been developed, and I'm not an expert on this, but this as it's.been explained to me, ah, pre-deploying boom would have been the right thing to do, making sure that there is boom right there in the region at various spots where you could anticipate if there was a spill of this size, the boom would be right there ready to grab.  Un, unfortunately, that what's always the case. When it comes to prior to this accident happening, I think there was a lack of anticipating what the worst-case scenarios would, ah, would be, and that's a problem...."  [Here is a fact of life--No person can plan for every potential disaster or every worst-cast scenarios.]
    "...There will be an official response shortly on the Sestak issue, ah, which I hope will answer your questions.  You will get it from my administration, and it, it will be coming out--when I  ay shortly, I mean shortly, I don't mean weeks or months.  I can assure the public that nothing improper took place, but, as I said, there will be a response, ah, shortly on that issue...."  [Note: I put this material here, but I do not comment on the material here.  You are urged to see my document entitled The Joe Sestak Incident Discussed by Mark R. Levin on May 28, 2010 (with material from Larry Kane, which can be reached by using this link: Sestak.]
    "...With the respect to the metaphor that was used, you know, I think Ken Salazar would probably be the first one to admit that he has been frustrated, angry, and occasionally emotion about this issue, like a lot of people have, and there are a lot of folks out there who see what's happening and are angry at BP or frustrated that it hasn't stopped, and so, you know, I'll let Ken answer for himself.  I would say that, you know, we don't need to use language like that...."  [On May 24, 2010, Ken Salazar (the head of the U.S. Department of the Interior) said: "...We will keep our boot on their neck until the job gets done...."  The quotation means that the federal government will keep its boot on the neck of British Petroleum, which is the owner of the oil-rig setup that had exploded on April 20, 2010, and the "boot" idea--which was at least the second time that Ken Salazar had used the idea--is what a person might expect a thug, a Nazi soldier, or a communist "storm trooper" to say.  (You are urged to see the "Ken Salazar" section of my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which can be reached by using this link: Crud.)]
    "...The fact that oil companies now have to go a mile under water and then drill another three miles below that in order to hit oil tells us something about the direction of the oil industry.  Extraction is more expensive, and it is gonna inherently be more risky, and so that's part of the reason you never heard me say, 'Drill, baby, drill,' because we can't drill our way out of the problem...."  [Barack Obama really showed his head is filled with mud by presenting us with this statement.  (Let me leave oil shale out of the discussion here.)  To get oil, people have had to drill since the 1800s, and they have had to drill deep--sometimes many miles down--because that is what it takes and has always taken.  On this day, Barack Obama announced that he was blocking the issuing of any new oil-drilling permits and halting all exploration drilling off the coasts of Alaska and Virginia and for thirty-three wells that exist in the Gulf of Mexico, and that will put many persons out of work for about six months.  In jest I say, "Yes, Barack Obama has come to save the day."  Now, thousands of more persons will be put out of work.  And you should clearly understand--Other countries or entities based in other countries are not stopping their work.  I say in jest, "Yes, Barack Obama is looking out for the interests of the United States of America.]
    "...I continue to believe what I said at that time, which was that domestic oil production is an important part of our overall energy mix.  Where I was wrong was in my belief that the oil companies had their act together when it came to worst-case scenarios.  Now that wasn't, ah, based on just my blind, ah, ah, acceptance on their statements.  Oil drilling has been goin' on in the Gulf, including deep water, for quite some time, ah, and the record of, ah, accidents like this, we hadn't seen before...."  [Yes, Barack Obama said that he is pro-oil.  Yet, because of a problem with one oil rig--of the thousands that exist in the world--Barack Obama is going to block the ability of people of the United States of America from searching and exploring to find more oil.  I disbelieve that Barack Obama is pro-oil for the United States of America, and that statement is made because I have come to understand what Barack Obama is and what he is doing.]

    Tuesday, June 1, 2010 (an appearance before press people had the oil-rig disaster as a topic):
    "...And we will absolutely continue to hold BP and any other responsible parties accountable for financial loses born by the people in the region...."  [See!  I say in jest, "Barack Obama is yet working hard on the oil leak!"  He took another hard-line stance.]
    "...But our responsibility doesn't end there.  We have an obligation to investigate what went wrong and to determine what reforms are needed so we never have experience a crisis like this again...."  [I say in jest, "Yes, the all-mighty Barack Obama will be able to stop all future accidents and disasters."]
    "...If the laws on our books are insufficient to prevent such a spill, the laws much changed."  [Let me change the subject slightly.  Have you ever watched a NASCAR race?  Guys and gals--engineers and mechanics--do a lot of work to try to stop parts of race cars from breaking down under use; for example, they test steel parts before using them, such as by using X-rays to look for flaws.  So, it seems to me, if Barack Obama would create a law that would stop any breakdowns from happening to NASCAR race cars, no NASCAR race car would ever break down again.  Hurray!  Oh, I say seriously, "Accidents happen, and you cannot stop all."]

    Wednesday, June 2, 2010 (at Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsuburg, Pennsylvania):
    "...We have to build a new and stronger foundation for growth and prosperity, and that's exactly what we've been doing the last sixteen months.  It's a foundation based on investments in our people and their future, investments in the skills and education we need to compete, investments in a twenty-first century infrastructure for America from high-speed railroads to high-speed Internet, investments in research and technology, like clean energy that can lead to new jobs and new exports and new industries.  New foundations are also based on reforms that will make our economy stronger and our businesses more competitive, reforms that will make health care cheaper, the financial system more secure, and our government less burdened with debt   [To Barack Obama, "a new and stronger foundation" is what he--a communist and black radical--thinks "a new and stronger foundation" is, and that is an economic system completely controlled by government, particularly in this case, probably him.  Much can be said about what Barack Obama presented in this quotation, but I cover only a couple points.  Notice how that Barack Obama said: "...like clean energy that can lead to new jobs and new exports and new industries...."  How can Barack Obama predict what will be created--he has neither a crystal ball nor a sound mind that can allow him to predict what will happen and be created in the future.  Anyway, Barack Obama's history shows that Barack Obama has actually created nothing in the past, from a paper clip to a car or from a hair style to new type of wrench.  And once again, Barack Obama lied about health care getting cheaper, and I hope you noticed his lie.]
    "...They said no to tax cuts for small businesses, no to tax credits, no to investments in clean energy, they said no to protecting patients from insurance companies and consumers from big banks.  Before I was even inaugurated, the Congressional leaders of the other party got together and made a calculation that if I failed, they'd win.  Before we even had a health-care bill, a Republican Senator actually said, 'If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo, it will break him.'  So those we're very helpful signs...."  [The "they" in this nonsense statement are the "Republicans."  I am glad the Republicans--at least the good ones--have done what they could to block Barack Obama and are working to block Barack Obama.  Barack Obama is crap, and I say that there is a time in life when a person has to say "no" or do nothing till a piece of crap of a man can be moved out of the way.]
    "...America does not stand still--we move forward.  And that's why I've said that, as we emerge from this recession, we can't afford to return to the pre-crisis status quo.  We can't go back to an economy that was too dependent on bubbles and debt and financial speculation...."  [Here was Barack Obama's attack on capitalism and push for a hard-line controlled socialistic or communistic economic system.]
    "...For much of the last ten years, we've tried it their way.  They gave us tax cuts that weren't paid for to millionaires who didn't need it...."  [Barack Obama lied again.  During the U.S. President George W. Bush administration, the tax cuts that were enacted were over all levels of income.  But it must be made clear that taxes are going to be raised on everyone because of Barack Obama's actions since January 20, 2010, such as through the new taxes that exist in the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010, which is the recently enacted health-care act.]
    "...We consume more than twenty percent of the world's oil, but have less than two percent of the world's oil reserves, so without a major change in our energy policy, our dependence on oil means that we will continue to send billions of dollars of our hard-earned wealth to other countries every month, including countries in dangerous and unstable regions.  In other words, our continued dependence on fossil fuels will jeopardize our national security, it will smother our planet, and it will continue to put our economy and our environment at risk...."  [Once again, Barack Obama brings up the "20 percent"/two percent" thought, which is defective thought.  I will work with Barack Obama's "20 percent" and "two percent," though they may not be correct.  First, the United States of America uses "20 percent," because it is a country that does things and makes things (crude oil is involved in the processes to make gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel, plastics, cosmetics, various types of oils (from sewing-machine oil to 10W30 oil), et cetera), and some countries, such as North Korea and Cuba, do nothing, because the people are unable to do anything, being blocked by the rules of their governments, such a communistic dictatorships.  Second, the United States of America may--may--have only two percent of the oil reserves (which, as presented by Barack Obama, probably does not include oil in shale), but that two percent, which is the supposedly a minimum known amount, will last for decades and decades.  Third, one reason that the United States of America gets oil from other countries is the Democratic Party has been instrumental in blocking the ability of U.S.-based companies from getting oil from U.S-associated lands and waters.  Note: Look at the tenth quotation under the section listed as "May 27, 2010," which shows information about how Barack Obama has blocked some new drilling operations.  Fourth, how does using oil put the environment at risk?  I have shown that the manmade-global-warming idea is a hoax. (You are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which shows information about "Climate-gate" and which can be reached by using this link: Carbon).]

    Thursday, June 3, 2010 (on Larry King Live):
    "...I had a situation room meeting about a week-and-a-half ago, ah, where we got the report that this could be a more severe than normal hurricane season.  And I asked, 'Well, how, how does, ah a potential oil spill interact with a hurricane?'  Ah, and, ah, it turns out that eh--now these are all estimations and probabilities--it turns out that a big powerful hurricane ironically is probably, ah...less, ah, damaging with respect to the oil spill, ah, because it just disperses everything and the oil breaks up and, and degrades more quickly.  Ah, it's, it's those tropical storms and tides that would just wash stuff in to the marshes that would really be an ecological disaster...."  [On Thursday, June 3, 2010, and Friday, June 4, 2010, I was thinking of not listing anything from the recorded interview with Larry King that had been shown during Larry King Live on CNN on June 3, 2010, but then on Saturday June 5, 2010, I heard Barack Obama was going to appear on Today in an interview with Matt Lauer on Tuesday, June 8, 2010.  Barack Obama seems to love to be before the press so that he can push his propaganda on the public and not do real work in Washington, D.C., as a worthwhile President would do.  Almost every day, Barack Obama is speaking before cameras somewhere.   Here, what I present of Barack Obama's interview with Larry King is useless information, but the text is something you can learn from.  Read Barack Obama's statement--which was not aided by a teleprompter--and notice how well Barack Obama does not speak (when not aided a teleprompter).  Barack Obama is basically nothing more than a average speaker or a mediocre speaker.  I have shown you more of the evidence.]

    Monday, June 7, 2010 (at Kalamazoo Central High School, Kalamazoo, Michigan):
    "...Don't make excuses.  Take responsibility not just for your successes, take responsibility where you fall short as well...."  [Again, Barack Obama preached before graduating students, and, yes, this set of words was said, but the words do not make up anything that Barack Obama follows, and the words were just more words from a defective mind.]

    Tuesday, June 8, 2010 (an interview with Matt Lauer on Today):
    "...I was down there a month ago before most of these talkin' heads were even paying attention to the Gulf.  A month ago, I was meeting with fishermen down there, standin' in the rain, talkin' about what a potential crisis this could be.  And I don't sit around just talking to experts because this is a college, ah, seminar.  We talked to these folks, because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose ass to kick!...."  [On this day, Barack Obama was in an informal interview with Matt Lauer and not an interview conducted in a hostile situation, and, yet, Barack Obama talked as you would expect a "street thug" to talk or a "gutter man" to talk.  By the way, Barack Obama did indeed drop some "g"s when speaking, which is what, for example, a "street thug" might do.  What Barack Obama showed through this statement, which was related to the oil-rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, is that he likes to play a man who can kick "ass."  By the way, Barack Obama noted that he went to the area a month ago to talk to fishermen.  What do fishermen know about capping an oil leak?]

    Tuesday, June 8, 2010 (during a teleconference with students in Maryland):
    "...Beginning this week, tens of thousands of seniors who fall into the doughnut hole, like Fran*, will receive a two-hundred-fifty-dollar rebate check to help you cover the cost of your prescriptions.  That will happen immediately.  That's starting now...."  [Two-hunded-fifty dollars is not much for a particular person, but it probably sounded good to naive students, who, in this case, happened to be seniors who would be able to vote in the coming elections, and what Barack Obama was doing was again buying votes with the money of other people--the citizens of the country.  Yes, Barack Obama would spend more money to buy votes, though, in essence, the country is broke.  I wonder how many of the students who heard Barack Obama's statement wondered where the money was coming from and realized spending the money was really just putting the country farther into debt, which they would have to pay back over the years to come, and it would not surprise me students probably thought--though it would be wrong--Barack Obama was working to help them and others, making Barack Obama a good guy in their eyes.  *  = Note: "Fran" may be incorrect, but that is what the word sounded like to me.]

    Monday, June 14, 2010 (in Alabama during the fourth visit to the Gulf of Mexico in relation to the oil-rig disaster that had started on April 20, 2010):
    "...Now, everybody here has had experiences dealing with disasters.  As we were flying over from Mississippi, ah, via helicopter, you can see the footprints of buildings that had been decimated from Katrina, but, in some ways, what we're dealing with here is unique because it's not actually one catastrophic event.  It's an ongoing assault whose movements are constantly changing.  That's what makes this crisis so challenging, and it means that it has to be constantly watched, it has to be tracked, ah, where, constantly having to redeploy resources, ah, to make sure that they're having maximum impact...."  [It must be remembered the Barack Obama administration had been involved--almost from the first day of the oil-rig disaster--in blocking equipment for fighting oil leaks from coming to the U.S.  from other countries, such as France, Canada, and the Netherlands, which had made an offer to provide help about three days after the oil-rig explosion had taken place.  If more equipment could have been set up in near the leak area sooner, the oil slicks would probably not have spread out as far as they had up to this date.  Now, Barack Obama is busy--fighting the good fight--as he noted by touching on such themes as "constantly watched" and "redeploy resources" regularly.]
    "...After seeing an initial oil-collection plan from BP, we went back to them and said, 'They need to move faster and more aggressively.'  And they have now come back with a plan to accelerate steps to contain over 50,000 barrels a day by the end of June, two weeks earlier than they had originally suggested...."  [It takes time to do things, and I say in jest--"Yes, I am sure BP purposely has been delaying action as much as possible, though they are losing money and more every moment--in lost time, lost oil, lost image, lost money."  And I also say in jest, "But Barack Obama got in there and gave the order to hurry up!"]
    "...Now I can't promise folks here in Theodore or across the Gulf Coast that the oil will be cleaned up over night--it will not be....."  [I say in jest, "No kidding!"]
    "...It's gonna take time for things to return to normal.  There's gonna be, ah, harmful effects on, ah, any local businesses, and it's gonna to be painful, ah, for a lot of folks.  Folks are gonna be frustrated.  Some folks are going to be angry.  But I promise you this that things are gonna return to normal.  This region that's known a lot of hardship will bounce back just like it's bounced back before...."  [Yes, the "ruler" gave his reassurances, and I say in jest, "And all will be better because of  Barack Obama."  Oh, I used the term "ruler," because I do believe Barack Obama does not see himself as a "representative" of anyone and does see himself as a "ruler."  Keep in mind: A "ruler" is higher in stature than a "representative" is, as in "a representative of the people," since a "representative" is like a pawn to others or is subservient to others or is at least somewhat beholden to the wishes of others, and a "ruler" is a ruler and is beholden to no one else.  Rulers are more powerful than representatives are.]
    "....But keep in mind we've got to do this across four states, and what that means is that, at any given time...the priority might be, we just want to get some stuff out twenty miles before it starts coming in closer, which means you're not going to see necessarily a lot of skimmers close in because every resource that we have is being deployed further out...."  [Ask yourself--"Has Barack Obama allowed every resource available to be used?   Look at the first quoted material for this section  Also, see my document entitled Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind, which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document.]
    Note: June 14, 2010--this is another "Flag Day."  I wonder if Barack Obama talked about "Flag Day" at some point on this day.  I do not have any text from him to present to you.

    Monday, June 14, 2010 (in Mississippi):
    "...Ah, we also talked about claims to make sure that people here in Mississippi, ah, but throughout the region are, ah, gonna be adequately compensated for the damages and the loses that they're experiencing right now.  I'm going to be meeting with the chairman of, ah, and other officials from BP on Wednesday, and so we're gathering up facts--stories--right now, ah, so that we have an absolute...."  [From this statement, you should ask yourself--The oil-rig disaster is yet ongoing, so why is the President of the United States of America wasting time gathering up and working on compensation stuff, right now?  That is not the job of the President of the United States of America!  Also, it is not the duty of anyone in the White House associated with the President.  I say in jest, "Yes, the Barack Obama is so worried about those who are being put out and is so eager to make sure they get compensated."]

    Tuesday, June 15, 2010 (a speech from the Oval Office of the White House):
    "...Because there's never been a leak this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology.  That's why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge--a team lead by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation's Secretary of Energy.  Scientists...national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice.  As a result of these efforts, we've directed BP to mobile additional equipment and technology.  And in the coming weeks and days, these efforts should capture up to ninety percent of the oil leaking out of the well.  This is until the company finishes drilling relief well later in the summer that's expect to stop the leak completely.  Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced.  And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it's not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days.  The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled in to the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years.  But make no mistake--we will fight this spill with everything we've got for as long as it takes.  We will make BP pay for the damage the company has caused...."   [For about seventeen minutes, Barack Obama spoke, and it was a presentation loaded with lies and deceptive thoughts, and this section presents thirteen main parts (as I define them), and here you have my first presentation   Stopping the leak may have "tested the limits of human technology," but containing the leak has not involved using all resources.  In my document entitled Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind, which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document, you will see evidence that shows the Barack Obama administration--particularly Barack Obama--has blocked foreign entities from helping contain the oil leak, and that is a fact, and that shows not every resource and tool has been and is being used to contain the leak.  Steven Chu has no expertise in filling holes in an oil pipeline--he is a physicist.  And people in academia are people who, generally speaking, have never done anything in real life--they always have had their heads in books and have been busy formulating possible ideas, which they do not put into practice usually through their own hands.  (Incidentally, in the 1950s, my father worked for a gas company, such as a surveyor in Wisconsin, helping to bring natural gas to Wisconsin and Michigan, and he had several cartoon published in a trade Gas-related magazine involving "pipeliners," and he later did draftsmen work related to, for one, water piping for General Motors factories, and if he were still alive, he would probably have a better idea about how to plug a pipeline leak than Dr. Steven Chu would.)  Oh, when did Barack Obama give the order to BP to get more equipment and technology?]
    "...From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental clean-up effort in our nation's history--an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost forty years of experience responding to disasters.  We now have nearly thirty-thousand personnel who are working across four states to contain and clean up the oil.  Thousands of ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf, and I've authorized the deployment of over seventeen-thousand National Guard members along the Coast.  These service men and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore.  They're ready to help clean the beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims.  And I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible...."  [So, the oil-rig disaster began on April 20, 2010, and only now, Barack Obama is urging governors to activate National Guard members.  Oh, yes, the National Guard members are going to be involved in "processing claims," which, it seems to me, Barack Obama thinks is a most-important thing for them to be doing right now, but I say that it would be better for the National Guard members to be involved in containing the oil, then there would be fewer claims to process.  (Note: By the way, earlier in the day, when Barack Obama was in Pensacola, Florida, Barack Obama said: "...All told, we've authorized the deployment of seventeen-thousand-five-hundred National Guardsmen to respond to this crisis.  So far, only about sixteen-hundred have been activated...."  Why are only sixteen-hundred on duty?  The crisis is in about the sixth week, and would it not be prudent to have at least seventeen-thousand-five-hundred National Guardsmen on duty, right now?   And if you have sixteen-hundred persons working, they do not work all the day, so some are working while some are resting, so, maybe, only eight-hundred of a possible seventeen-thousand-plus are on duty now.)]
    "...As the cleanup continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our Coastal states may need. Now, a mobilization of this speed and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise.  I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip.  So, something isn't working, we want to hear about it.  If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them..."   [What "speed" has Barack Obama been involved with?  He did not publicly comment on the oil-rig disaster till about eight days after the disaster had started.  I say in jest, "Yes, Barack Obama will be willing to listen to you, as he has promised in the past to listen to others and the ideas of others!" ]
    "...Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of this company's recklessness.  And this fund will not be controlled by BP.  In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent third party...."   [There has been no proof given--such as in court--that BP did something that was "reckless."   Barack Obama has no authority to order a company to set aside money in an escrow account handled by someone else.  How much money is it that BP is supposed to set aside?  What is a "fair and timely manner"?  I say in jest, "Yes, Barack Obama gets lucky and gets to play the thug and dictator and put demands on BP."]
    "...The oil spill represents just the latest blow to a place that's already suffered multiple economic disasters and decades of environmental degradation that has lead to disappearing wetlands and habitats...."   [What does Barack Obama mean by "decades of environmental degradation"?  Does Barack Obama mean that what people have done by living have in some way hurt the environment?  I say in jest, "Yes, we just can't have people living in the environment."  What proof does Barack Obama have the the environment has been hurt?  The environment has no feelings and it is always changing.  And so it goes for dirt and rocks and plants.  By the way, along a Great Lake, I have seen waves kill trees--the waves washed out the roots of the trees and killed them.]
    "...Earlier, I ask Ray Mavas, the Secretary of the Navy, who's also a former governor of Mississippi and a son of the Gulf Coast, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast restoration plan as soon as possible.  The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists, and other Gulf residents, and BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region...."  [Yes, all those people are going to come together and develop a master plan.  It will be a collage of people and millions of ideas.  What a mess it will be.  You should see what a mess it is to create a master plan related to zoning for a simple little township.  What is going to happen is thousands and thousands of people will do their thing as individuals or as members of a community or town and slowly do what they can for themselves.  But, really, all the Barack Obama is really concerned about--it seems to me--is having BP pay!   By the way, it seems very likely to me BP will never be able to pay--shut down by too many defective demands.]
    "...A few months ago, I approved a proposal to consider new limited offshore drilling under the assurance that it would be absolutely safe, that the proper technology will be in place, and the necessary precautions would be taken.  That obviously was not the case in the Deepwa, ah, Deepwater Horizon rig.  And I want to know why.  The American people deserve to know why.  The families I met with last week who lost their loved ones in the explosion--these families deserve to know why.  And, so, I've established a national commission to understand the causes of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and environmental standards we need to put in place.  Already, I've issued a six-month moratorium on deep-water drilling.  I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deep-water drilling to continue...."  [Nothing can be made "absolutely safe."  But Barack Obama can use the pretext of "absolutely safe" to stop or delay anything he wants now--particularly drilling for oil in waters associated with the United States of America.  I say in jest, "Hurray!  Barack Obama has created another government commission."  Some weeks and weeks ago, Barack Obama created a commission that was going to come up with ideas about how the government could lower the national debt, and it is commonly known the commission is a sham--designed to recommend more taxes and not less spending.  I wonder what this new commission will do to harm the oil industry of the country (being a commission behold to Barack Obama).  Why do I--who have analyzed what Barack Obama has done since January 20, 2009--believe the new commission will find a reason to restrict or cancel deep-water drilling in waters associated with the United States of America?]
    "...Now, one place where we've already begun to take action is at the agency in charge of regulating drilling and issuing permits, known as the Minerals Management Service.  For the last decade, this agency has become emblematic of a failed philosophy that views all regulation with hostility, a philosophy that says corporations should be allowed to play by their own rules and police themselves.  At this agency, industry insiders were put in charge of industry oversight.  Oil companies showered regulators with gifts and favors and were essentially allowed to conduct their own safety inspections and write their own regulations.  When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst corruption at this agency.  It is now clear that the problem, there, ran much deeper and the pace of reform was just too slow, so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency...."  [This set of words from Barack Obama is truly high-level crap.  This set of words was put forth to attack specifically the U.S. George W. Bush administration and put the blame on the leak on the U.S. George W. Bush administration.  However, before the oil rig blew up in the Gulf of Mexico, the Barack Obama administration had given the oil rig, in essence, an okay award.  The Minerals Management Service has been made the "fall guy."  I say in jest, "Yes, Barack Obama is going to rid the Minerals Management Service of all the corruption and all the corrupt people--people who are tied to the U.S. George W. Bush administration.  Hurray!"  However, you should see my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--Like Minds Get Together" which shows all the tax cheats, Marxists, crooks, and such who are linked to Barack Obama today, and that document can be reached by using this link: Crud.  I also say in jest, "Yes, have trust in a liar."]
    "...But a larger lesson is that, no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk.  After all, oil is a finite resource.  We consume more than twenty percent of the world's oil, but have less than two percent of the world's oil reserves, and that's part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean because we're running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water. For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily assessable oil were numbered.  For decades, we've talked and talked about the need to end America's century-long addiction to fossil fuels, and for decades, we have failed to act with a sense of urgency that this challenge requires.  Time and again, the path forward has been blocked, not only by oil-industry lobbyists but also by a lack of political courage and candor.  The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight...."   [This set of words of filled with nonsense.  Again, Barack Obama brought up the "twenty percent/two percent" theme, which is nonsense, and you should see the entries for April 2, 2010, and June 2, 2010, especially the latter entry.  Why is drilling for oil today more risky than it was in years past?  Drilling for oil is work and involves risk--risk of finding no oil, risk of injury to oil-rig workers, risk of bad weather.  Since "oil is a finite resource," Barack Obama wants us to stop drilling for oil it seems (though other countries are going to continue to drill for oil, such as in the Gulf of Mexico).  America has no addiction to fossil fuels!  Wind power is not an element or a chemical or a molecule that can be used to make clothing, gas, makeup products, and many things that are made form oil.  Oil is used because it has to be used.  And solar power is not an element or a chemical or a molecule that can be used to make things.  Oil has to be used, since there is nothing that can replace oil.  One reason deep-water drilling takes place is the Democrat Party has been instrumental in the last several decades in blocking the ability of companies to drill in shallow water and nearer to coasts and in lands associated with the United States of America that have oil.  Remember: If we do not have oil, the country can produce nothing, and that kills industries, jobs, businesses, and the country.  You should see: Barack Obama is an evil and ill man!]
    "...The time to embrace a clean-energy future is now!  Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America's innovation and cease control of our own destiny.  This is not some distant vision for America...."  [Every day in this country, individuals are involved in innovation, like in no other country.  We never stopped being innovative.  And, in the past, the innovation was not directed by government as a rule; it was directed by individuals who knew what was in their minds and worked with their minds and tried things.  No government can dictate the creation a new energy or energy source!  And Americans have been ceasing control of their own destiny for decades--without help from the government.  A government cannot set a destiny for a people unless that government is a tyrannical and oppressive government!]
    "...Transition away from fossil fuels is gonna take some time.  But over the last year and a half, we've already taken unprecedented action to jump start the clean-energy industry.  As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines.  People are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels.  Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy efficient.  Scientists and researchers are discovering clean-energy technologies that some day will lead to entire new industries...."  [This statement is Barack Obama's idea for a "green" world--that without oil.  Oh, did you know parts in wind turbines need oil so that the parts do not break down from friction?  Such a rosy picture Barack Obama paints.  Such predictions from a man who has done nothing and created nothing!  Such foolishness it all is--Barack Obama's mind.  Actually, when you try to relate "oil" with the statements presented in this paragraph, which is what he tried to do, you should see how laughable Barack Obama is; for example, try to connect the ideas of reducing the dependence on "oil" with "installing energy-efficient windows," which, by the way, could be made from oil--vinyl.  Oh, what clean-energy job do you hope to have in the future?  Will you be cleaning up as a janitor?]
    "...You know, when I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence.  Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive climate and energy bill--a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America's businesses  [Liar!  Liar!  Liar!  The bill is a tax-increasing bill for everyone in the country, and the bill is designed to put coal-based businesses, oil-based businesses, and carbon-associated business out of business over time.  And when the businesses are gone and when such businesses only exist in other countries, what will this country produce?  Remember: Barack Obama is--at least--a communist--and he does not like businesses because they make "profit."  You are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this link: Carbon. ]
    "...And, yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom.  Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is the capacity to shape our destiny, our determination to fight for the America we want for our children, even if we're unsure exactly what that looks like, even if we don't yet precisely know how we're gonna get there, we know we'll get there...."  [Ugh!]
    Note: Okay, I have done enough with this defective speech; however, I could spend hours more showing why this speech is crud.

    Wednesday, June 16, 2010 (a statement to the press after meeting with officials of BP):
    "...I think today was a good start, ah, and it should provide some assurance to, ah, some of the small business owners and individuals down in the Gulf who are, [I] was visiting with, ah, that BP is going to meet its responsibilities...."  [The next two parts of this section will show whether or not "today was a good start"--for the country.]
    "...This discussion today was essential.  Currently, under federal law, there is a seventy-five-million-dollar cap on how much oil companies, ah, could under certain circumstances be required to pay for economic damages resulting from a spill such as this.  That amount obviously would be insufficient.  Ah, that's why I'm pleased to announce that BP has agreed to set aside twenty-billion dollars to pay claims for damages resulting from this spill.  Ah, this twenty-billion dollars, ah, will provide substantial assurance the claims people and businesses have will be honored.  It's also important to emphasize this is not a cap.  Ah, the people of the Gulf have my commitment that BP will meet its obligations to them...."  [In essence, on this day, Barack Obama took or in some way extorted twenty-billion dollars from BP, and that was done even thought Barack Obama has no legal power to require BP to make twenty-billion dollars available to some type of fund, and it also means Barack Obama circumvented normal court processes--arbitration processes and other legal processes--that would be involved in people's asking for reimbursement on claims of damage, and that is bad for the country.]
    "...Another important element is that this twenty-billion dollar, ah, fund will not be controlled by either BP or by the government.  It will be put in a escrow account, administered by an impartial independent third party...."  [Okay, I will not comment directly on this set of words, but I will comment on it indirectly by using a question asked by an anchor on MSNBC on June 16, 2010, and the answer to the question from U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (a Democrat related to Minnesota).  The anchor said, "I know you, like the White House, would like to see BP pony up twenty-billion dollars.  I have a specific question for you.  On what legal basis can the com, can the government demand that BP set aside this money?  What's the specific legal authority for this?"  Senator Amy Klobuchar answered, "Well, first of all, if we have to pass a statue to create that authority, we will...."  Yes, Barack Obama has already used his power as the President to get money from BP, and U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar has showed that Barack Obama has no legal power get BP to give up the money and has showed that she would be willing to--after the fact--create a statue.  Note: At this point, I know not who will be watching over the fund, but history will show sooner or later whether or not the who who is required to watch over the fund actually distributed the money to where it should go or used money in the fund for corrupt purposes, but I do know what Barack Obama did on this day is bad for the country.]
    Note: It must be remembered that, in early 2009, Barack Obama was involved in Chrysler bankruptcy case and was instrumental in not allowing secured bond holders to get what was really due them (and you should see my documents entitled Madness in a President and Other Matters in a Defective Mind and Frank Beckmann of WJR-AM Interviews Tom Lauria, an Attorney in Chrysler Mess, which give evidence that Barack Obama used coercion to get the investment groups or hedge funds (which can also be considered "bond holders" in this case) to accept less than what was truly due them in the bankruptcy mess related to Chrysler, and the links to those documents exist at the end of this document).

    Friday, June 18, 2010 (at a road construction site in Ohio):
    "...Ultimately, that's the purpose of the Recovery Act--not just to jump start the economy and get us out of the hole right now but to make the investments that will spur growth and spread prosperity and pay dividends to our communities for generations to come.  Ah, since I was here last year, we've begun to see progress all across the country.  Businesses are beginning to hire again...."  [Notice that Barack Obama used the word "investments."  Government does not make investments, as most people know "investments" to be.  Government can take money from businesses and people and can spend the money on things, but spending the money that is taken is is not spent as an investment, such as to make a business bigger or to hire more employees.]
    "...Along with investments in health care and education, clean energy, and a twenty-first century  financial system that protects consumers and our economy, rebuilding our infrastructure is one of the keys to our future prosperity.  If we're gonna rebuild America's economy, then we gotta to rebuild American period....'  [Ask yourself--What does Barack Obama mean by "rebuild America period."  What is it that Barack Obama wishes to create?  What vision of structure for America does Barack Obama have in mind?  It seems to me, if you rebuild America, you take it away from a government based on The U.S. Constitution and you make it a communist country or a dictatorship or something else that is a failed form of government, and failed forms of government, like communistic governments, are commonplace around the world.  Of course, maybe, Barack Obama's mind can only think about rebuilding all the roads in the country, and that is his idea of rebuilding America.]
    "...For our economy to thrive in this new century, we've got to act with that same sense of purpose and that same spirit of innovation.  That's why the recovery is just beginning and just the beginning of the investments we're gonna have to make for years on our infrastructure...."  [Yes, you should see from this statement that Barack Obama seems to have plans to spend more and more and more--it is just the beginning in his mind of some, it seems to me, grand world--and that means he will have to tax and tax and tax to get at least some of the money that he hopes to spend in the future.]

    Monday, June 21, 2010 (a video statement to his "troops" of Organizing for America):
    "...If we refuse to heed the warnings of this disaster, we will have missed our best chance to help build the clean-energy future America needs.  But if we seize this moment, we can rebuild our economy on a new foundation...."  [I put this statement in to show you that Barack Obama is using the oil-rig disaster of the Gulf of Mexico, which had started on April 20, 2010, to push his "troops" along in their efforts to fight for cap-and-trade and other climate-related nonsense, and since the manmade-climate-change idea is a hoax, which is well known publicly, it shows that Barack Obama is an evil man, purposely working to hurt the United States of America with lies.]

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010 (announced the "Patients Bill of Rights"):
    "...Today, I'm announcing that the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury are issuing new regulations under the Affordable Care Act that will put an end to some of the worst practices in the insurance industry and put in place the strongest consumer protections in our history.  Finally, what amounts to a true Patient's Bill of Rights is long over due...."  [Yes, Barack Obama was trying to convince people that, before this day, patients had no rights in this country in relation to medical care and that there no federal laws or state laws that protected patients.  Yes, once again, Barack Obama attacked the insurance industry.  Yes, Barack Obams was trying to convince you that the federal government cares for you and cares about you.  Ha!]
    "...I've got some folks on the other side of the aisle that say none of this should happen, ah, and, in fact, have said they're gonna run on a platform of repeal.  They want to go back to the system we had before.  Would you?  Would you want to go back to discriminating against children with pre-existing conditions.  Would you want to go back dropping coverage for people when they get sick?  Would you want to reinstate lifetime limits on benefits?...."  [Ugh!  Yes, Barack Obama was trying to convince you that everything of the past was bad, terrible, horrible....  Yes, Barack Obama was trying to get you to not vote for anybody who might return you to that time of the past, that sickening time before the Patients Protection and Affordable Health Care Act existed.]

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010 (an announcement about General Stanley McChrystal):
        "...Today, I accepted General Stanley McChrystal's resignation as commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.  I did so with considerable regret, but also with certainty that it was the right for our mission in Afghanistan, for our military, and for our country.  I'm also pleased to nominate General David Petraeus to take command in Afghanistan, which will allow us to maintain the momentum and leadership that we need to succeed...."  [Oh, Barack Obama passed along a piece of news.]
    "...I don't make this decision based on any difference in policy with General McChrystal, as we are in full agreement of strategy.  Nor do I make this decision out of any sense of personal insult. Stan McChrystal has always shown great courtesy and carried out my order faithfully...."  [Well, it is good to known from Barack Obama that General McChrystal "carried out my order faithfully."]
    "...As difficult as it is to lose General McChrystal, I believe that it is the right decision for our national security.  The conduct represented in the recently published article does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general.  It undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system, and it erodes the trust that is necessary for our team to work together to achieve our objectives in Afghanistan...." [You should see the entry known as "69" in my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this link: History, since it gives some background information about this General Stanley McChrystal incident.]
    "...It is my duty to ensure that no diversion complicates the vital mission they are carrying out.  That includes adherence to a strict code of conduct.  Our democracy depends upon institutions that are stronger than individuals.  That includes strict adherence to the military chain of command and respect for civilian control over that chain of command.  I've just told my national security team that now is the time for all of us to come together.  Doing so is not an option but an obligation.  I welcome debate among my team but I don't tolerate division.  All of us have personal interests.  All of us have opinions.  Our politics often fuels conflict.  But we have to renew our sense of common purpose and meet our responsibility to one another and to our troops, who are in harm's way, and our country...."  [Oh, the hint at "division" in this statement related to an article published recently in Rolling Stone that was entitled "The Runaway General," which the informed or the evil say has evidence that, in essence, General Stanley McChrystal was disrespecting Barack Obama, which is wrong.]
    "...General Petraeus fully participated in our review last fall, and he both supported and helped designed the strategy that we have in place.  And his current post at Central Command, he has worked closely with our forces in Afghanistan, he has worked closely with Congress, he has worked closely with the Afghan and Pakistan governments and with all our partners in the region.  He has my full confidence...."  [Does Barack Obama have full confidence in General David Petreaus?  To find out, you should see the entry known as "69" in my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this link: History, since it gives some background information about this General Stanley McChrystal incident.]

    Thursday, June 24, 2010 (a press conference with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev):
    "...Ah, we said in Pittsburgh in the G20 that it was important for us to rebalance in part because the U.S. economy for a long period of time was the engine of world economy.  We were sucking in imports from all across the world financed by huge amounts of consumer debt.  Ah, because of the financial crisis, but also because, ah, that, that was fundamentally unsustainable, ah, the United States is not gonna be able to serve in that same capacity to that same extent...."  [What you have here is Barack Obama's putting down the United States of America for getting things from other places, helping the economies of those other places, and what you have here is Barack Obama's warning that he is going to cause at least a worldwide recession because the United States of America is not going to buy as many products--purposely because of him--from other places in the world.  By the way, Barack Obama did not note that companies in the United States of America have exported things to other places in the world for decades.  I could argue well that, when people in the United States of America do not or cannot buy as many products from other places in the world as they used to, other places in the world will have recessions or the world could have a worldwide depression.]
    "...The generation that stood together as allies in the Second World War--the Great Patriotic War--in which the Russian people suffered and sacrificed so much...."

    Thursday, June 24, 2010 (commenting on the passing of a bill--the Disclose Act--in the U.S. House of Representatives):
    "...I congratulate the House of Representatives on today's passage of the Disclose Act, a critical piece of legislation to control the flood of special interest money into our elections.  The Disclose Act would establish the strongest-ever disclosure requirements for election-related spending by special interests, including Wall Street and big oil companies, and it would restrict spending by foreign-controlled corporations.  It would give the American public the right so see exactly who is spending money in an attempt to influence campaigns for public office.  The House bill is not perfect.  I would have preferred that it include no exemptions.  But it mandates unprecedented transparency in campaign spending, and it ensures that corporations who spend money on American elections are accountable first and foremost to the American people.  I urge the Senate to act swiftly on its version of the bill, and I look forward to working with both chambers on prompt enactment of final legislation."  [On this day, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill informally entitled the "Disclose Act," and what is presented in the quoted material in this section is Barack Obama's comments about the bill.  You must see my document entitled Fairness?: A Guide for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America, because it has a long section that shows that the Disclose Act is a bad bill, since it limits free speech and is like a bill that a person could expect to be passed in a country that is changing from a free country to a communist country, and to reach the document, you can use this link: Fairness.  By the way, BP, which is an oil-related company, is based in England, and over the years, BP has given campaign money to Barack Obama (Lovely, Erica.  "Obama biggest recipient of BP cash."  Politico, 5 May 2010, 5:37 p.m. EDT.).]

    Friday, June 25, 2010 (outside the White House):
    "...We'll put in place the toughest consumer financial protections in our history, while creating an independent agency to enforce the law.  Through this agency, we'll combine under one roof the consumer protection functions that currently are divided among half a dozen different agencies.  Now, there will be one agency, whose sole job will be to look out for you...."   [What is "independent" about an independent govenment agency?  A government body is no "third party."  A government agency--in this day and age with Barack Obama--is a hostile agency--hostile to businesses of all types and hostile to the individual and all individuals.]

    Saturday, June 26, 2010, and Sunday, June 7, 2010 (at the "G20" Summit" in Toronto, Ontario, Canada):
    "...A long and durable recovery also requires countries not having an undue advantage...."  [I had a number of audio cuts of Barack Obama at the "G20," but I only focus on a couple, this one of which gets the most focus, though the final one presented in this section gets a lot of focus.  Notice this set of words--"undue advantage."  Man has been on the planet for many centuries, and if I start from the year "0" A.D., I can say that people have been developing and operating countries for two centuries, and countries have come and gone, and if I only look at the last two-hundred years, I can say that countries have come and gone and that some countries have done better than other countries and some countries do better than others do.  Look at Africa!  Man has been in Africa for decades and centuries, and, basically, what Africa has is a lot of defective countries, some of which are tribal societies, with grass huts and such, and enslave their people to harsh conditions, and some are truly, truly poor countries.  The poor conditions in Africa were not caused by the United States of America!  In the quoted material of this section, you can see that Barack Obama thinks the United States of America has some type of "undue advantage."  What is that 'undue advantage' in his mind?  For nearly thirty years, while doing radio work, I reported on tourist attractions in Michigan and, even for a part of that time, tourist attractions in the northern half of Wisconsin, and I learned history about how, for example, Michigan grew.  For example, voyageurs came from Europe and traded with the Indians and trapped and hunted, and people set up communities, which began as nothing more than dirt and log homes, and one of the first commercial ventures in the Straits of Mackinac area was an 1600s mill (which, today, is a tourist attraction called Historic Mill Creek), and miners worked underground in iron mines and copper minds in the 1800s, and all people had hard times, but the people did thing, being allowed to do things because they were not blocked from doing things by government, which has happened and is happening in countries in Africa, especially those with tribal ways and dictators, and when I go to some restaurants in the northern parts of Michigan, I am regularly reminded of the past times in Michigan by old photographs on the walls of businesses, such as a pasty shop in Mackinaw City.  And now I think about the set of words used by Barack Obama--"undue advantage."  Where does "undue advantage" come from?  It comes from nowhere.  People in the United States of America started with nothing and did things, and what has happened and been done over the last thirty plus decades has led to what the United States of America is today.  Barack Obama does not like that the United States of America is what it is and has what it has, so it seems he has to level the playing field, such as by economically draining or economically shrinking the United States of America.  Barack Obama has a truly sick mind, as is show by this simple little quotation that I present.  Also, what the United States of America is is a standard setter or an entity that gives a standard for other peoples to look toward and try to follow, especially peoples in bad countries, and the United States of America shows people that there is something better in life than what their political leaders, such as dictators, allow them to have.  Think about this--If Barack Obama does not like a country having an 'undue advantage,' what would he do to stop a country from having his idea of an 'undue advantage' and how far would he go to kill the 'undue advantge'?]
   "...After years of taking on too much debt, Americans cannot and will not borrow and buy the world's way to lasting prosperity.  No nation should assume its past prosperity is simply paved with exports to the United States....'  [In this presented material, Barack Obama put down American people for taking on debt.  I say that the matter of a person's taking on debt is for that person to decide, and the person has to suffer the bad consequences of taking on too much debt if that should happen.  Then, I come to Barack Obama.  This man--through laws that he has signed since January 20, 2010--has put the United States of America, which is the people of the country, in super- deep debt, and I had no say so in not putting the country in deep, deep debt, and that angers me.]
    "...You know, one of the interesting things that's, ah, happened over the last eighteen months as President is, for some reason, people keep on being surprised when I do what I said that I was gonna do.   So, I say I'm gonna reform our health-care system, and people think, 'Well, gosh, that's not smart politics.  'Maybe we should hold off.'..."  [Okay, I have given you this part as the first setup material to the final quoted material in this section.]
    "...Or I say, 'We're gonna move forward on don't-ask-don't-tell.'  Ah, somehow people, ah, say, you know, 'Well, why a you doing that?  Ah, I'm not sure that's good politics.'  I'm doin' it, because I said I was going to do it, and I think it's the right thing to do...."  [Okay, I have given you this part as the second material to the final quoted material in this section.]
    "...And...people should learn that lesson about me because, next year, when I start presenting, ah, some very difficult choices to the country, ah, you know, I hope some of these folks who are hollerin' about deficits and debt, ah, step up, 'cause I'm callin' their bluff...."   [The two previous parts of quoted material from Barack Obama had been said right before he said what is shown here.  Barack Obama has put the United States of America in super-deep debt.  One way to cut back federal debt is to cut back in spending, but Barack Obama will not do that.  Another way to cut back federal debt--the debt of the federal government--is to bring in more revenue to the federal government, and, in essence, that can only be done by raising taxes on companies and people.  So, in Barack Obama's mind the 'difficult choices' will involve raising taxes and creating new taxes, such as "cap-and-trade" taxes and "value-added" taxes, both of which--I say--will hurt the country and should never have to be created.  Barack Obama has put forth through this quotation and the previous two quotations that he was going to do something to reduce the federal deficit, and the people who oppose him in reducing the federal debt--which will come about through more taxes--are the bad people, and American citizens should look at the people who oppose Barack Obama as very bad, bad people indeed.  I say in jest, 'Yes, you should look on the people who oppose Barack Obama's plans and work to increase taxes as bad, bad, bad people.'   Do you see how sick Barack Obama's thinking is and how sick Barack Obama's mind is?]

    Wednesday, June 30, 2010 (in Racine, Wisconsin):
    "...As we speak--right now--we're on the verge of passing the most comprehensive financial reform since the Great Depression, a reform that will prevent a crisis like this from happening again.  But I have to tell, ya, you would think this would be a bipartisan issue, don't you?  I mean you'd think everybody would say, 'All right, what, what we we're doin', that, that didn't work.  We really gotta tighten things up a little bit.'  But right now most of our friends on, in the other party are, are planning to vote against this reform...."  [I will only point out a few problems here.  Barack Obama called his enemies "friends," but they are not "friends" to Barack Obama, but he wanted the audience to think he is sort of a friendly with those other guys.  Yes, I say in jest, "Barack Obama is a nice guy."  How can Barack Obama assure anyone that no economic crisis will ever happen again?  Remember: Instrumental in creating the 2008 economic crisis was the Democratic Party--Barack Obama's poiltical party--which had pushed and passed bad laws on the country.  Why must passing the "reform" be a "bipartisan issue" if the "reform" being pushed is bad?  You should see Barack Obama hopes you will hate those other guys since they are planning to vote "no."  But, of course, you know not what is in the legislation, so how do you know if it is good or bad?  (I bet Barack Obama has no idea what is in the "reform" legislation.)  I have evidence that the "reform" legislation being pushed is bad, very bad--for example, it does not address the problems that are Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which were at the center of the 2008 crash.]
    "...So the job of the Recovery Act was to essentially step in and say, 'You know, what?  This is an emergency, so we're gonna plug that hole in demand in the economy temporarily so that everybody kind of settles down...."  [I bet the idiots in the audience on this day thought this statement was so profound, though it was nonsense.]
    "...Every economist who's looked at it has said that the Recovery did it's job...."  [Liar!  Much of the money that has been spent of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 went to states to shore up states economically, which had over spent and were in debt crisis.  And it has been publicly reported and proven that the act it not stimulate the creation in the private sector of the country.  Liar, Barack Obama!]

    Thursday, July 1, 2010 (at American University School of International Service, Washington, D.C.):
    "...Our Constitution was barely dry when, amidst conflict, Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts, which placed harsh restrictions on those suspected of having foreign allegiances.  A century ago, immigrants from Ireland, Italy, Poland, other European countries were routinely subjected to rank discrimination and ugly stereotypes.  Chinese immigrants were held in detention and deported from Angel Island in the San Francisco Bay.  They didn't even get to come in.  The politics of who is and who is not allowed to enter this country and on what terms has always been contentious, and that remains true today...."  [Barack Obama passed along some general history, which I will call fairly correct.  Then, Barack Obama said, "...that remains true today."  That statement is a big lie, but he wanted to tie past events to current events.  He tried to use the logic that goes something like--these happened so this still happens.  He used a deceptive measure to pull in the ignorant and naive into believing him.  What he did was at least unethical.]
    "...Now the majority of Americans are skeptical of a blanket amnesty.  They are also skeptical that it is possible to round up and deport eleven-million people.  They know it's not possible.  It would tear at the very fabric of this nation, because immigrants who are here illegally are now intricately woven into that fabric.  Many have children who are American citizens.  Even if it was possible, a program of mass deportations would disrupt our economy and communities in ways that most Americans would find intolerable...."  [Barack Obama passed along a lot of nonsense in this set of words.  It is not necessary for a country--such as this country--to deport eleven-million people, which would include physically finding them and handling them.  All that a country has to do is make laws that cut off free stuff to illegal aliens and stop illegal aliens from working in this country, and also all this country has to do is enforce laws that already exist.  Then, many, many illegal aliens will leave, unable to get free things and free medical care and unable to get jobs.  Also, there is a problem with the current U.S. law--a law exists that allows a baby born in this country to illegal aliens to become an American citizen.  That is nonsense, and that law should be destroyed.  Next, since mass deportation does not need to be done, there would be no big disruptions of our economy and communities.  And, anyway, if a big deportation program were to take place, it would not take place all of a sudden on one day--it would be done over a period of time, such as months and months.  What Barack Obama did is present a false idea, which some people might call a "straw-man argument."]
    "...Contrary to some of the reports that you see, crime along the border is down, and statistics collected by Customs and Border Protection reflect a significant reduction in the number of people trying to cross the border illegally, so the bottom line is this--the southern border is more secure today than at any time in the last twenty years...."  [What Barack Obama said this time was B.S.  You are urged to see my documents entitled Illegal Aliens and Immigration: The Focus is Protecting the Home--the United States of America, which can be reached through this Illegal link, and "La Raza": Yet Another Enemy in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this La Raza link, because they have some information about how parts of Arizona are under the control of Mexican drug smugglers and other defective people around this time.]
    "...We can create a pathway for legal status that is fair, reflective of our values, and works...."  [The country has immigration laws.  The problem is people are entering and staying in the country illegally.  I guess, in Barack Obama's mind, he has another thing to work on of America that he thinks is unfair.  It seems to me there is no limit to the things of this country that he thinks are unfair.   have yet to hear him say something in America is good.]
    "...A young woman named Emma Lazarus, who's own family fled persecution from Europe generations earlier took up the cause of these new immigrants.  Although she was a poet, she spent much of her time advocating for better health and housing for the newcomers.  Inspired by what she saw and hear, she wrote down her thoughts and donated a piece of work to help pay for the construction of a new statue, the Statue of Liberty, which actually was funded in part by small donations from people across America...."   [Emma Lazarus was not involving in raising money for the Statue of Liberty.  The Statue of Liberty was funded and created by the French--the people of France.  And it was a gift for the first anniversary of The Declaration of Independence.  Emma Lazarus donated a poem that was used to raise money for the pedestal for the Statue of Liberty.  Well, that enough of that.  Let me show something else.  Barack Obama said, "..advocating for better health care and housing...."  Yes, I say in jest, "Barack Obama can be likened to Emma Lazarus, since Barack Obama has pushed for better health care and better housing."  Incidentally, Emma Lazarus' work that is important to the discussion here is "The New Colossus," which was written in 1883, and the Statue of Liberty was dedicated in 1886.]
    "...Years before the statue was built, years before it would be seen by throngs of immigrants training their necks skyward at the end of a long a brutal voyage, years before it would come to symbolize everything that we cherish, she imagined what it could mean.  She imagined the sight of a giant statue at the entry point of a great nation, but, unlike the great monuments of the past, this would not signal an empire.  Instead, it would signal one's arrival to a place or opportunity and refuge...." [I could say much about this, but let me only present one thing.  Notice--Does it not seem that Barack Obama is making it seem that Emma Lazarus was instrument in creating the Statue of Liberty?  She was not.]
    "...States like Arizona have decided to take matters into their own hands.  And given the levels of frustration across the country, this is understandable.  But it is also ill-conceived.  And it's not just that the law Arizona passed is divisive, although it has fanned the flames of an already contentious debate, laws like Arizona's put huge pressures on local law enforcement to enforce rules that ultimately are unenforceable, it puts pressure on already hard-strapped state and local budgets, it makes it difficult for people here illegally to report crimes, driving a wedge between communities and law enforcement, making the streets more dangerous, making jobs of our police officers more difficult.  These laws also have the potential of violating the rights of innocent American citizens and legal residents, making them subject ta possible stops or questioning because of what they look like or how they sound...."   [To Barack Obama, Arizona is a rough entity, supposedly going against the federal government--or at least that is what is is trying to convince people of, but the law to which Barack Obama refers--the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act of 2010--is nothing more than a restating of federal law, which Barack Obama has shown he wishes not to uphold.  What frustration is Barack Obama referring to?  I do not know.  Barack Obama said, "...driving a wedge between communities and law enforcement...."  That is nonsense.  Communities create their law-enforcement entitles, and communities are not disrupted by laws the get rid of illegal aliens.  Oh, think about this--Maybe, we should not make any law, since, as Barack Obama tried to persuade you into believing, laws make the streets "more dangerous" and make "jobs of our police officers more difficult."  Oh, think about this--If illegal aliens were not in the country, you would not have to worry whether or not they have difficulty reporting crimes.  That is all that I will cover for now.  That is enough!]

    Friday, July 2, 2010 (at Andrews Air Force Base):
    "...All told, our economy has created nearly 600,000 pivate-sector jobs this year...."   [The number is not good, considering how big the country is, and, in fact, it regular times, I would expect to have some 400,000 a month created if not more.]
    "...Now, make no mistake, we are headed in the right direction, but, as I was reminded on a trip to Racine, Wisconsin, earlier this week, we're not headed there fast enough for a lot of Americans.  We're not headed there fast enough for me either.  The recession dug us a whole of about eight-million-jobs deep.  And we continue to fight head winds from volatile global markets.  That's why we're continuing a relentless effort across multiple fronts to keep this recovery moving...."  [What does "volatile global markets" have to do with creating jobs in the United States of America? Barack Obama attempted to put the blame on something other than the economic policies that he is pushing.  Generally speaking, what happens in Turkey or Greece or Brazil or some other country does not affect the ability of companies in this country, such as a restaurant or hotel, from adding jobs or creating jobs.]
    "...The Departments of Commerce and Agriculture will invest in sixty-six new projects across America that will finally bring reliable broadband Internet service to communities that currently have little or no access.  In the short there, we expect these projects to create about five-thousand construction and installation jobs around the country...."  [What is "expected" and what will happen can be two different things.  So, if this happens as Barack Obama expects, that is only five-thousand jobs, which, when you divide 5,000 by 50 (for fifty states), gives you one-hundred jobs a state.  The country is trying to make up for the roughly eight-million jobs that have been lost because of the economic crash.  How many six-month periods would needed to make up the roughly 7,995,000 that are left to go?]
    "...To every American who's looking for work, I promise you we are gonna keep on doing everything that we can.  I will do everything in my power to help our economy create jobs and opportunity for all people...."   [Here was yet another promise from the "ruler"--Barack Obama.]

    Friday, July 2, 2010: (in West Virginia, for the funeral of U.S. Senator Robert Byrd):
    "...As I reflect on his full sweep of ninety-two years, it seems to me that his life bent toward justice like The Constitution he tuck in his pocket, like our nation itself, Robert Byrd possessed the quintessential American quality.  That is a capacity to change...."  ["Capacity to change"--this set of words makes me think--knowing that they came from Barack Obama, who is at least a communist and black radical--he is trying to make the listener think that his type of change is good and should be embraced and a person should not resist the change that Barack Obama is pushing because the person would not be like Robert Byrd, who, as Barack Obama noted, had a "capacity to change."]
    "...Our lives are marked by sins and well as virtues, failures and well as successes, weakness as well a strength.  We know there are things he said, things he did that he came to regret.  I remember talkin' about that first time I visited with him.  He said, 'There are things that I regretted in my youth. You may know them.'  And I said, 'None of us are absence some regrets, Senator.  That's why we enjoy and seek the grace of God.'...."  [Ugh!]

    Sunday, July 4, 2010 (at the South Lawn of the White House):
    "...We celebrate the principles that are timeless--tenets first declared by men of property and wealth, but which gave rise to what Lincoln called 'a new birth of freedom in America.'  Civil rights, and voting rights, workers' rights, and women's right, and the rights of every American...."  [Notice: Barack Obama, who hates businesses and the ability of most individuals in a country to have property (which covers more than only land), as you can expect from a communist, which Barack Obama is, attacked the founders by trying to show the men happened to have property and wealth, though it was not as if others in the communities of the colonies did not and though some of the people involved in the creation of this country were not wealthy or lost wealth and put their lives on the line by opposing the British--their opposing the King of England made them people who the British at the time had to capture and imprison or kill.]

    Tuesday, July 6, 2010 (a meeting with the press with Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu of Israel near him):
    "...As Prime Minister Netayahu indicated in his speech, ah, the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable.  Ah, it encompasses our national-security interests, our strategic interests, ah, but, most importantly, the bond of two democracies who share a common set of values...." [So much could be said about this nonsense and lie.  I note only one.  Barack Obama is a communist, a black radical, and a Muslim, and his values are not what the Israelis have for values--the Israelis are not trying to make their country based on Sharia or communism, as Barack Obama is trying to do with the United States of America.]

    Wednesday, July 7, 2010 (at the White House):
    "...Some might argue that government has no roll to play at all in our economy.  Everybody in this room understands the free market depends on a government that sets clear rules that ensure fair and honest competition, that lives within its means, that invests in certain things that the private sector can't on its own.  In the absence of sound oversight, responsible businesses forced to compete against unscrupulous and underhanded businesses are unencumbered by any restrictions on activities that might harm the environment or take advantage of middle-class families or threaten to bring down the entire financial system...."  [Barack Obama misused "free market" in this discussion.  The "free market" may be affected by laws to some extent, but the "free market" is not a market in which the government tells businesses what to do, what to make, what to pay people, et cetera, which is the market that Barack Obama, as at least a communist, wants.  Barack Obama put forth the idea that some businesses of a number of businesses of the same type have an advantage for because they are "unencumbered," which has to refer to laws.  Generally speaking, the businesses of the same type are affected by the same laws; for example, one hardware store in an area of a number hardware stores is not excluded from the laws that the others must abide by.  And notice that what Barack Obama did was put down businesses and worked to show that government, for one, is going to protect the middle-class family, which is nonsense.]
    "...As I told other leaders at the G20, after years of taking on too much debt, Americans will no longer borrow and buy the world's way to lasting prosperity.  We alone cannot be the engines of economic growth.  Furthermore, a strong and durable recovery requires that countries not have an undue advantage...."  [Once again, Barack Obama passed along these defective themes.  Ugh!]
    "...Growth won't come from an economy where prosperity is based on fleeting bubbles, of consumption, of debt.  We can't rely on paper gains.  We've seen where that led us, and we're not going back.  If we want to once again approach full employment and fuel real economic growth, then we need an end to the policies that got us here.  We need to lay a new and stronger foundation on which businesses can thrive and create jobs and rising incomes...."  [To me, Barack Obama's "we're not going back" means we are not going back to a system in which businesses decide what to do and we--his "we"--are going to a system in which the government tells business what to do.  I wonder what type of "new foundation" did Barack Obama refer to?  I have never heard, such as in economics class at university, that the United States economy has always been based on "fleeting bubbles," but I know the economy has been based on a countless number of businesses all trying to do things to survive and make money, which, each day, involves millions and millions of decisions, and I know some businesses fail, as has happened since the country was founded and some businesses succeed.]

    Wednesday, July 7, 2010 (on Israeli TV):
    "...Well, you know, it's, it's interesting.  This, this is a thing that, ah, actually surfaced even before I was elected President, and, ah, some of the talk that was circulating, ah, within the Jewish-American community.  Um...ironically, ah, you know, I've got a Chief of Staff named Rahm Israel Emanuel.  My top political advisor is somebody who's, ah...a descendent of Holocaust survivors.  Ah...you know...my closeness to the Jewish-American community was probably what propelled me to, ah, the U.S. Senate, and, ah, my, not just knowledge, but sympathy and identification with the Jewish experience, um, is rooted in part, because of the historic connection between the African-American freedom movement here in the United States and, ah, the, the civil-rights efforts of Jewish-Americans and some of the same impulses that led to the creation of, ah, Israel, ah, and so I think where this, what this arises from, ah, some of the ...see that the fact that my middle name is Hussein and that creates suspicion.  Some of it may have to do with the fact that I have actively reached out to the Muslim community...."  [Barack Obama was asked for his views about how Israelis do not seem to see him having a special connection with Israel.  Notice how sloppy his response was.  In the end, you should ask yourself--What the hell did he say?]
    "...Well, eh, you know, some of this has been greatly overstated.  Ah, ah, I mean, the, the last time that the Prime Minister came here, ah, we had a terrific meeting.   Ah, he was so good that it spilled over, and the reports that came out that somehow I snubbed the Prime Minster, ah, when, in fact, what had happened was, ah, the Prime Minister was interested and eager enough in working out some issues that he wanted to convene with his team, ah, and then I came back and we then had this meeting...."  [I am aware that the Prime Minister Benjamin Netayahu of Israel was not treated well in the meeting that had taken place before this recent July meeting did, but I will not talk about the issue.  "Terrific"--this word stood out in my mind when I began to put this text version together.  In the 1980s, I studied the book entitled Modern American Usage (by Wilson Follett), and in that book, I learned that "terrific" once had a meaning that meant bad and not good.  Keep that old definition of "terrific" in mind.]

    Thursday, July 8, 2010 (at Smith Electric Vehicles in Kansas City, Missouri):
    "...Ultimately, government doesn't create all the jobs, government can't guarantee growth by itself, but what government can do lay the foundation for small businesses to expand and to thrive, for entrepreneurs to open up shop and test out new productions, for workers to get the training that the need, and for families to achieve some measure of economic security, and that roll is especially important in tough economic times, and that's why, when my administration began, we immediately cut taxes--that's right--ah, and you wouldn't from listening to folks, but we cut taxes for working families and for small-business owners all across American to help them weather the storm...."   [Liar!  Government cannot "lay the foundation" unless that foundation is one in which it reduces taxes so that, for one, entrepreneurs and small-business owners have money--spare money--that they can use to try things, which may or may not work (not everything works).  In the statement, Barack Obama said that "we"--his administration--reduced taxes, and he did for some in a minimal way, especially given that fact that, in 2011, a lot of new taxes are scheduled to hit everyone, and some new taxes--and I call those "really evil taxes"--could be "cap-and-trade taxes," "wealth taxes," and "value-added taxes."   In truth, in good times and bad times, government is not the driving force in creating jobs, except government jobs (which create nothing)!]
    "...There's some people who argue that we should abandon some of these efforts.  Some people make a political calculation that's better to say 'no' to everything than to lean a hand to clean up the mess that we've been in.  I mean, this is been a difficult time for America lately.  Two years of brutal recession.  A decade of economic insecurity.   And there are going to be some hard days ahead.  That's the truth!  It's going to take a while for use to dig ourselves out of this hole...."  [Were you paying attention?  Barack Obama hinted that the recession is still going on, but in the recent past, people on his side of the aisle have been saying the recession was done.  And what was the "decade of economic insecurity" in Barack Obama's mind?  That decade was certainly not most of the ten years before Barack Obama took office (except in Michigan, which had a recession going on for some time before the national crash of 2008 took place).]
    "...The policies that led to this economic disaster were pretty straightforward.  We cut taxes for billionaires and millionaires who don't need the tax cuts, didn't even ask for them...."  [Cutting taxes for billionaires and millionaires--which happened in the early years of the U.S. President George W. Bush administration--did not cause the economic disaster of 2008.  Barack Obama lied big time in this statement.  Government policies that had been pushed into law and practice by mostly members of the Democratic Party since the 1970s, especially those related to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, were instrumental in the economic crash.]
    "...So the same folks--of the other party--whose policies gave us this economic crisis are now lookin' for another chance...."  [Liar!]

    Thursday, July 15, 2010 (in Holland, Michigan):
    "...Just a few years ago, American businesses manufactured only two percent of the world's advanced batteries for electric and hybrid vehicles, but because of what's happening at places like this, in just five years, we'll have up to forty percent of the world's capacity.  For years, you've been hearing about manufacturing jobs disappearing overseas, you are leading the way in showing how manufacturing jobs are coming right back here to the United States of America...."  [This day was the day on which the financial-reform bill went through the final passage stage in the U.S. Congress, and Barack Obama was at a battery factory in Holland, Michigan.  So, why would Barack Obama be happy with the "forty percent" idea of his statement?  A lot of new big power plants are going to have to be created to turn this country into a country in which the electric car will be the dominate type of vehicle on the roads, or a lot fewer vehicles will be on the roads and a lot fewer people will have vehicles, which is the idea that Marxists wish for for the country because people will do less traveling in the country, and when people are kept from being easily mobile, they can be controlled better by government, especially when that government is made up of communists (enslavers).  But, really, being proud of the "forty percent" should be seen as nonsense, since other countries are not rushing to be battery producers for vehicles, knowing battery cars will not work in the long run, one reason of which is because the countries have poor electricity systems and another reason of which is citizens could not afford the electric vehicles.]
    "...Because of a grant to this company, a grant that's leveraging more than a hundred-and-fifty-million private dollars, as many as three-hundred people will be put to work doing construction and another three-hundred will eventually be hired to operate this plant when it's fully up and running, and this is gonna lead to growth in local businesses, like parts suppliers and restaurants...."  [Generally speaking, it took $150,000,000.000--a "grant"--to create up to three-hundred jobs at a battery plant, and, yet, battery cars are in the long run going to be a failure, because it is going to take the building of many more big electricity-generating systems to charge up all the vehicles that will potentially become the commonplace vehicles on the roads, and it is clear wind-turbine systems and solar-power systems can never be built in enough quantity to allow the country to become a country filled mostly with electric cars, and for more information on the subject of electric cars, you should see my document entitled The Power and the Power Killers: Energy in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this Powerlink, and you will see that document shows that the electric car is a "dead issue."]

    Thursday, July 15, 2010 (commenting on the passing of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in the U.S. Congress on this day):
    "...What members of both parties realize is that we can't allow a financial crisis like this one, ah, that we just went through to happen again.  This reform will prevent that from happening...."  [Well, the dictator gave his views.   It seems very unlikely Barack Obama had read the roughly 2,300-page bill before making the statement.  So, is his statement nonsense?  Here is what U.S. Senator Chris Dodd (a Democrat related to Connecticut), who was a co-sponsor of the bill--the informal name of which is the "Dodd-Frank Bill"--had to say about the bill on the floor of the U.S. Senate on July 15, 2010: "...Ah, it is not a perfect bill.  I'll be the first to admit that.  We don't know ultimately how well the ideas we've incorporated here will achieve the results we all desire.  It'll take the next economic crisis--as certainly it will come--to determine whether or not the provisions of this bill will actually provide this generation or the next generation of regulators with the tools necessary to minimize the effects of that crisis when it happens...."  Do you see the problem?]

    Friday, July 16, 2010 (talking about the latest attempt to cap the oil-rig leak in the Gulf of Mexico):
    "...We are making steady progress.  I think the American people should, ah, should take some heart in the fact that we're making on this front.  The key here right now is for us to make decisions based on science, based on what's best for the people of the Gulf, not based on PR, not based on politics.  We won't be done until we actually know that we've killed the well and that we have a permanent solution in place.  We're moving in that direction, ah, but I don't want us to get too far ahead of ourselves...."  [I have nothing to about the quotations in this section, since they are "fluff" and "filler," but I note them as having been said.]
    "...Well, I think it's important, ah, that we don't ahead of ourselves.  You know, one of the problems with having, ah, this camera down there is that, when the oil stops gushing, everybody feels like we're done.  And we're not.  Ah, the new cap is containing the oil, right now.  But scientists are doing a number of tests.  What they want to make sure of is that, by putting this cap on, the oil isn't seeping out elsewhere in ways that could it be even more cat, catastrophic.  And that involves measuring pressures while this cap is on...."
    "...Well, I would expect that, sometime in the next several weeks, I'll be back down.  What we're trying to do, right now, is to make sure that, ah, the technical folks on the ground are making the best possible decisions to shut this well down as quickly as possible, that we're standing up funds so that people are compensated quickly...."

    Monday, July 19, 2010 (at the White House):
    "...For a long time, there's been a tradition under both Democratic and Republican Presidents to offer relief to the unemployed.  That was certainly the case under my predecessor when Republican Senators voted several times to extend emergency unemployment benefits.  But, right now, these benefits--benefits that are often a person's sole source of income while they are looking for work--are in jeopardy...."   [On this day, Barack Obama was at the White House and surrounded by some--it seems--unemployed persons (I know nothing about how much work these unemployed persons have done to get a job).  ]
    "...A majority of Senators have tried--not once, not twice, but three times--to extend emergency relief on a temporary basis. Each time, the partisan minority in the Senate has used parliamentary maneuvers to block a vote, denying millions of people who are out of work much needed relief...."  [Here, Barack Obama attacked the Republicans for not joining with him, though the Republicans were pushing the idea of not spending more money but of cutting something else to free up money for the unemployment funds.]
    [***Update, update, update: I have to put in an aside here, putting it in on Thursday, July 29, 2010, and this aside is about a woman who will be mentioned in the next quoted material.  On July 28, 2010 and July 29, 2010, a news entity called Newsplex.com gave information in an Internet story that noted that Leslie Macko was tied to a petit larceny conviction in July 2007 and worked for ACAC Fitness and Wellness Center from July 2007 to April 2010, a month after she had been convicted of prescription drug fraud, and Newsplex.com noted that White House Press Spokesman Robert Gates had to admit on the afternoon of Thursday, July 29, 2010, that the White House would not have had Leslie Macko standing with Barack Obama on July 19, 2010, had it been known that Leslie Macko has a criminal past (Jaglois, Jessica.  "UPDATE: White House Reacts to Guest's Criminal Past."  Newsplex.com, 29 July 2010, 7:21 p.m.).]
    "...We need to pass it for men like Jim Chukalas, who's with me here today.  Jim worked as a parts manager at a Honda dealership until about two years ago.   He posted resumes everywhere.  He's gone door to door looking for jobs.  And he hasn't got a single interview.  He's trying to be strong for his two kids, but not that he's exhausted his unemployment benefits, that's getting harder to do.  We need to pass it for women like Leslie Macko, who lost her job at a fitness center last year and has been looking for work ever since.  Because she's eligible for only a few more weeks of unemployment, she's doing what she never thought she'd have to do--not at this point, anyway--she's turning to her father for financial suport.  We need to pass for Americans like Denise Gibson, who was laid off from a real-estate agency earlier this year.  Denise has been interviewing for jobs, but so far nothing's turned up...."  [So, Barack Obama showed off several persons who are having a hard time finding a job--in day and age when Barack Obama has been doing things to block businesses from creating jobs and has been working to kill jobs, such as by putting a moratorium on deepwater oil drilling and by working to ruin businesses along the Gulf of Mexico by allowing leaked oil from a damaged oil rig to get to the beaches (and you are urged to see my document entitled The Oil-Rig Disaster of April 20, 2010: Evidence that Shows Barack Obama Purposely Wanted to Hurt the Beaches, which can be reached by using this link: Oil Rig).  Yes, some have been out of work for quite a while.  Since Barack Obama got in the office of the U.S. Presidency, job creation in the private sector has been, in essence, stalled, and that is because, for one, businesses know taxes are going up in 2011, when, for example, income taxes are going up for all individuals, since what are called the "Bush tax cuts" will expire.  Really, Barack Obama does not want the private sector to create jobs but does want the federal government to give people unemployment benefits--which it seems he wants to happen for many, many years and which would be bad for the country.]
    "...And I have to say, after years of championing policies that turned a record surplus into a massive deficit, the same people who didn't have any problems spending hundreds of billions of dollars on tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans are now saying, 'We shouldn't offer relief to middle-class Americans, like Jim or Leslie or Denise, who really....'"  [Ugh!]

    Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (signing the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009):
    "...Finally, because of this law, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street's mistakes.  There will be no more tax-funded bailouts, period!  If a large financial institution should ever fail, this reform gives us the ability to wind it down without endangering the broader economy, and there will be new rules to make clear that no firm is somehow protected because it is too big to fail so we don't have another AIG...." [Federal laws were instrumental in the crash of 2008, or it can be said that the federal government was instrumental in the crash, and, really, Democrats were much more involved than Republicans were in creating and keeping the federal laws that caused the economic crash.]
    "...This reform will help foster innovation...."  [This statement really has me at a loss.  Laws do not foster innovation--people foster innovation.  However, in Barack Obama's mind, maybe laws do foster innovation when those laws change a country from, for instance, a capitalistic country to a communist country, the latter of which has a far different economic system than a capitalistic country has, and so Barack Obama is involved in innovation--changing the country from a capitalistic country to some other type of country, such as a communist country.  "Is not innovation fun?"--I ask that question in jest, knowing, for example, that the new federal act does not do anything to change the bad business practices of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which were instrumental in the 2008 economic crash, and knowing, for instance, that the new act allows the federal government to continue using bailouts, which can allow the federal government to become more involved in owning or controlling businesses, which happens in communist countries or fascist countries (Remember: The federal government is already a partial owner in General Motors and Chrysler).  And this new federal act gives the federal government the ability to take over businesses that do not request bailouts or wish to be involved in bailouts.]

    Thursday, July 22, 2010 (at the signing of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act):
    "...When government doesn't work like it should, it has a real affect on people's lives, on small-business owners who need loans, on young people who want to go to college, on the men and women who serve this country and are trying to get the benefits that they've earned, and when we continue to spend as if deficits don't matter, that means our kids and our grand kids may wind up saddled with debts that they'll never be able to repay...."  [Barack Obama has been instrumental in spending more money than any man in history in about two years, and Barack Obama has added several trillion dollars to the national debt since he came into the office of the Presidency of the United States of America, and, yet, Barack Obama made this statement.]
    "...We've drafted a budget for next year that freezes all discretionary spending outside of national security for three years, a budget, by the way, that would reduce this spending--non-defense discretionary spending--to its lowest level as a share of the economy in fifty years.  This isn't talked about a lot, so I'm gonna repeat it.  Our budget would take non-security defense, er, er, er, non-defense spending to its lowest level since JFK, lowest levels as a percent to the economy since JFK...."  [Yes, Barack Obama promoted the idea that discretionary spending is being frozen, which will probably  be shown to be a lie in truth in the future, but Barack Obama said nothing about non-discretionary spending, such as spending related to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the new health-care act, et cetera--all the big social programs that are bankrupting the country because of mismanagement and fraud and whatever.]

    Friday, July 23, 2010 (at the White House in the Roosevelt Room):
    "...I want to talk about, dah, the progress that we made this week on three fronts, as we work to repair the damage to our economy from this recession and build a stronger foundation for the future.  So taken together, we made enormous progress on Wall Street reform, on making sure that we're eliminating waste and abuse in government, and in providing immediate assistance to people who are out there lookin' for work...."  [The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, which was made a law on July 2, 2010, is yet another piece of bad law that is tied to Barack Obama that must be completely repealed as soon as possible, as far as I am concerned, and yet Barack Obama praises, in essence, himself for having made it a law.  I urge you to learn more about the federal act by seeing my document entitled The So-Called "Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009": Deception, Lies, and the Government Takeover, which can be reached by using this link: Protection?.]
    "...But, ultimately, our goal is to make sure people who are looking for work can find a job.  And that's why it's so important for the Senate to pass the additional steps that I've asked for to cut taxes and expand lending for America's small businesses, our most important engine for hiring and for growth.  And a small-business jobs bill that contains these measures may come up for a final vote in the Senate in the next few days..."  [Okay!  I looked at some Web sites to double-check this quotation, and I found the Los Angeles Times had an articled entitled "Text: Obama on Wall Street, economic reform and the Senate's 'partisan minority'" (Text: Obama on Wall Street, economic reform and the Senate's 'partisan minority'"  Los Angeles Times, 23 July 2010, 12:31 p.m.) on the Internet, and with the text provided, the article had a photograph of Barack Obama.  In the photograph--in the background behind Barack Obama--was a painting of Theodore Roosevelt, which was out of focus, but, to me, the photograph was a highly staged presentation, which was attempting to tie Barack Obama to Theodore Roosevelt in spirit (both riding heroically off to victory) and make Barack Obama look good, though Barack Obama did look a bit haggard.  Such "uck" it all was!  Now, I add this thought--On Friday, July 23, 2010, Mark Levin, the host of the nationally syndicated radio show entitled The Mark Levin Show, noted that he has had telephone calls recently from people involved with small businesses--either running them or trying to start them--who have noted how difficult it can be to qualify for small-business loans programs that have already be made possible during the time of the Barack Obama administration, and I report, as Mark Levin hinted, that you should be aware that, even though Barack Obama announces that he is going to work to "expand lending for America's small businesses," it does not mean many small businesses will be able to qualify for the loans, and you will never know how many people really do have the qualifications and get loans under whatever new programs are created because that information will surely not be readily available to you or will surely not be reported by the media in the future.]

    Thursday, July 29, 2010 (on The View, a weekday show on ABC-TV):
    "...Well, actually, ah, ah, Elisabeth, what's, what's happened is that we've gained private-sector jobs for the last five months.  So, we were losing jobs when I was sworn in, as I said--750,000 jobs per month.  We've now gained jobs for five consecutive months in the private sector, so I know that's not satisfying and it's not good enough...."   [This was a response to Elisabeth Hasselbeck, who had asked, roughly--"How can you continue and your administration say that you are saving jobs when, in fact, people are losing jobs?"  I will not comment on Barack Obama's statement.  I want you to go to the "Monday, July 19, 2010" entry.  I want to make sure you see the "Update, Update, Update" part.]
    "...Well, well, it, it makes a difference, though, if your job was one of the ones that's saved.  This was not a matter of the jobs for those people, it's also the services that would have been lost, kids who would not have had teachers in the classroom...."  [How does a person know whether or not the person is in a "saved" job?]
    "...If the, if the world saw me as African-American, ah--and that wasn't something that I needed to run away from--that's something that I could go ahead an embrace.  And the interesting thing about the African-American experience in this country is that we are sort of a mongrel people.  I mean we're all kind of mixed up.  Ah, and, now, that's actually true for, ah, white America as well, but we just know more about it.  Ah, and, and, and so, I'm less interested in, in how we label ourselves.  I'm more interested in how we treat each other, and if we're treating each other right, then I can be African-American, I can be multi-racial, I can be you-name-it.  Ah, what matters is--Am I showing people respect, am I carrying for one, ah, for, for other people?...."  [When I first heard this statement, I thought Barack Obama sees the United States of America as having a "white America" and a "mongrel" America and probably other types of America, and Barack Obama sees at least some blacks are mongrels or dogs--just animals--though he puts himself in the category.  In fact, to me, Barack Obama seems to have a low opinion of humans and does not value humans much, even himself, which is why he is willing to hurt other humans (as I show in a sentence that is coming up).  When I heard the line "all kind of mixed up," I thought to myself Barack Obama is all kind of mixed up in the head, since the overall statement is odd.  After hearing his statement, I wondered--What U.S. President of the past has ever talked such nonsense?  In addition, Barack Obama has already shown that he is a racist by, for example, having been in the church of Reverend Jeremiah Wright's for about twenty years, where Reverend Jeremiah Wright showed that he was a racist and a "whites" hater, and having chosen Sonia Sotomayor (another racist and supporter of "La Raza") to be a judge on the U.S. Supreme Court.  And history shows that Barack Obama does not treat people well, and good examples of that are his coercion of the bondholders related to the Chrysler bankruptcy in early 2009, his non-response to the bad flooding in Nashville (Tennessee) in May 2009, and his wish to defeat the immigration-related law of Arizona by taking Arizona to court, though people--Americans--are being hurt by criminals and bad people coming in to Arizona from Mexico.]

    Friday, July 30, 2010 (in Hamtramck, Michigan, at a Chrysler plant):
    "...Now, we, we, basically, had three options when I was confronting what was happening in the U.S. auto industry.  Option number one was to keep on doing what the previous administration had been doing, which was, basically, give about a billion dollars a month to auto industry but not really ask for any kind of change that would get it on the right track.  Option two was to do nothing, and, as I said, we would have lost another million jobs.  But, more importantly, we would have lost what has been the heart and soul of American manufacturing, what has built the middle class, not just here in Detroit but all throughout the Midwest, what has made us proud and has been a symbol of our economic power...."  [Where did Barack Obama get the idea that "another million jobs" would be lost?  If the federal government would have done nothing and if General Motors and Chrysler would have gone bankrupt, it was very unlikely General Motors and Chrysler would not have existed at all and all the jobs of the two companies would have disappeared.  A lot of companies go through bankruptcy and do not disappear, though some jobs sometimes do disappear.  Okay, I will pass along rough statistics from Wikipedia, which I found on July 30, 2010--generally speaking, the total number of employees for General Motors in 2009 was about 204,000, and the total number of employees for Chrysler in 2008 was 58,000.  Let me see: 204,000 plus 58,000 is 262,000.  I ask again, though in a slightly different way--What method and factors were use to come up with "another million jobs"?  As a side note I say, remember: Barack Obama did close down a bunch of automobile dealerships, which were not even owned by two auto makers, and killed a bunch of jobs.  ("Chrysler." Wikipedia.com, 29 July 2010; "General Motors."  Wikipedia.com, 30 July 2010.)]

    Monday, August 2, 2010 (recorded on Friday, July 30, 2010, and shown on The Early Show on CBS-TV on this date):
    "...And we wanna work with Arizona.  I understand the frustration of the people in Arizona, but what we can't do is demagogue the issue...."  [Barack Obama is a demogogue!  This entire document shows that Barack Obama is a demogogue.  Yet, Barack Obama talked about demagoguing the issue (which was the immigration issue).]
    "...And what we can't do is allow a patchwork of fifty different states or cities or localities where anybody who wants to make a name for themselves, ah, suddenly says, 'I'm gonna be anti-immigrant and I'm gonna try to see if I can solve the problem myself.'  This is a national problem...."  [This set of words really show the garbage that Barack Obama is.  Arizona created a law--Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act--earlier in the year, because the Barack Obama administration had not enforcing immigration law, and the Arizona law was nothing but a mirror image of the federal law, and then the Barack Obama administration challenge the law of Arizona in court.  Barack Obama implied that the people in Arizona, such as the governor of Arizona, are "anti-immigrant."  Barack Obama's statement--is that not the way of a defective man and racist, promoting racism without any proof and without backing up the statement?]

    Monday, August 2, 2010 (in Atlanta, Georgia, for a Disabled American Veterans 89th National Convention):
    "...Our nation has had vigorous debates over the Iraq war.  There are patriots who supported going to war and patriots who opposed it, but there has never been any daylight between us when it comes to supporting the more than one-million Americans in uniform that served in Iraq, far more than any conflict since Vietnam...."  [Yes, Barack Obama gave another speech.  Yawn!]
    "...As a candidate for President, I pledged to bring the war in Iraq to a responsible end.  Surely, after taking office, I announced our new strategy for Iraq and for a transition to full Iraqi responsibility, and I made it clear that, by August 31, 2010, America's combat mission in Iraq would end, and that is exactly what we are doing, as promised and on schedule...."  [More, yawn!  Yet, I wonder--What did the guys and the gals in the audience think?  Were the guys and gals those who understand Barack Obama has betrayed the U.S. soldiers in the Middle East, such as, in late 2009, by delaying the decision to send more troops to the Middle East and choosing to send much less than the requested number of troops to the Middle East.]

    Wednesday, August 4, 2010 (at the AFL-CIO Executive Council Meeting):
    "...We learned over night that efforts to stop the well, ah, through what's called a 'static kill' appear to be working and that a report today by our scientists show that the vast majority of the spilled oil has been dispersed or removed from the water, so the long battle to stop the leak and contain the oil is finally close to coming to an end...."  [I will not break apart what was said, but I will note that you should find an audio version of this statement so that you can hear how flat Barack Obama's delivery was, as if Barack Obama was disappointed about what had happened.]

    Thursday, August 5, 2010 (at a Ford Motor Company plant in Chicago, Illinois):
    "...Now, Ford was in better financial shape and was able to weather the storm without federal assistance...."  [I heard this statement for the first time on The Rush Limbaugh Program, a nationally syndicated radio show, on this day, and Rush Limbaugh reported that the cut was taken from the television coverage of the speech by MSNBC.  When Barack Obama finished the word "assistance," the crowd around him cheered (for about seven seconds).  Right then, MSNBC cut away from covering the event.]
    "...That's, that's a testament to the hard work you all do in Detroit that this company made, but I don't have to tell ya, and your CEO will, you know, has said this publicly, if your competitors had gone down, they would have taken down a whole bunch of the suppliers that you depend on.  The, the brand of American autos would have diminished.  That would have had severe consequences for Ford.  And that's the challenge we faced when I took office--an industry that was on the brink...." [This quotation is what was said right after the clapping ended after the quotation noted in the previous paragraph of this section had been said.  During this part, there was no clapping or cheering from the audience.  What Barack Obama said was nonsense.  For one, if the other auto companies would have shut down completely, which would not have happened in normal bankruptcy proceedings, Ford Motor Company would have probably grown bigger and hired more people, and that is all that I will say here, since the entry for July 30, 2010, provides more thoughts from me that could be place here.]
    "...And to all those naysayers in Washington--what we call the just-say-no crowd--who said that investing in you would guarantee failure, who said that we should just walk away from this industry, who said that standing by America's auto makers was quote 'the worst investment you could make', who tried to block us at every turn, I wish they were standing here today and saw what I see.  I wish they could see the pride you take in building these great cars--American-made cars.  And my message to them is--Don't bet against the American worker, don't lose faith in the American people, don't lose faith in American industry.  We are coming back! ..."  [Here, Barack Obama sounded as if he was giving a campaign speech in which he was rallying the troops.  In my mind I heard, "Yes!  Follow me!  Follow me, my followers!  I will take care of you!  Vote for me!"   Yet, I well understand Barack Obama wants the people to be slaves and be enslaved.  The liar was on parade again!]

    Thursday, August 5, 2010 (at a fund-raising event Alexi Giannoulias (a Democrat), a candidate for the U.S. Senate in relation to Illinois):
    "...They haven't come out with a single solitary idea that is different from the policies that held sway for eight years before Democrats took over--not a single policy difference that's discernible from George W. Bush, not one.  So what they're really betting on is amnesia.  They're betting that you didn't notice that the recession started under their watch...."  [Ugh!  It was just another speech.  However, keep in mind Barack Obama is using old ideas--failed communistic, socialistic, and thug ideas--to hurt this country.]

    Monday, August 9, 2010 (at a Democratic National Committee fund-raising event):
   "...Right now, all around this country, ah, there are groups with harmless-sounding names like Americans for Prosperity who are running millions of dollars of ads against Democratic cong, candidates--all around the country.  And they don't have to say who exactly the Americans for Prosperity are.  You don't know if it's a foreign-controlled corporation.  You don't know if it's a big oil company or a big bank.  You don't know if it's a insurance company that wants to see some of the provisions of health-reform repealed because it's good for their bottom line, even if it's not good for the American people.  A Supreme Court decision allowed this to happen..."  [Barack Obama--showing himself here to be a Marxist and communist and radical--covered a lot of ground in this statement filled with what I call "crap."  American Center for Prosperity is an nonprofit organization that is conservative based and is made up of citizens of the United States of America who uphold values and ways of The U.S. Constitution, and it was founded in 2004, and it is an organization that is involved in opposing Barack Obama and the Barack Obama administration.  Notice how Barack Obama worked to persuade people that the Americans for Prosperity could be associated closely with a foreign entity, an oil company, a bank, or an insurance company, all of which Barack Obama has attacked through legislation and speeches, such as this speech, hinting that, for example, banks, oil companies, and insurance companies are bad.  Barack Obama referred to a decision by U.S. Supreme Court, and that decision was related to the case known as Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (January 21, 2010), which I talk about in my document entitled Fairness?: A Guide for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man, and it was a case that came down to--really--the idea of whether or not the federal government could ban, for example, some books and DVDs (but Barack Obama and other Democrats have tried since January 21, 2010, to hide that fact and  have tried to persuade everyone that it was a decision that allowed companies to spend money on elections and make the individual's vote useless, which is nonsense).  In the quotation, Barack Obama put down the U.S. Supreme Court--or at least the justices who voted, in essence, against him in the decision to which I refer, and Barack Obama tried to make listeners believe the U.S. Supreme Court decision was keeping people from knowing who is really--supposedly--behind the entity known as the Americans for Prosperity.  Barack Obama has his own special organization--Organizating for America, which was founded in January 2009.  Who is really behind that?  Notice how both "Americans for Prosperity" and "Organizing for America" both seem to promote "America," since each has "America" in the name, but, really, Organizing for America is a left-wing entity or a communist-based entity or a Marxist-based entity or et cetera, and the entity does not promote as good the United States of America as it was founded or The U.S. Constitution as it was set up.  I could argue well that Barack Obama's speech was a speech that is supposed to inspire hate against those who stand for The U.S. Constitution and the United States of America as it was founded.]
    "...They don't want you to know who the Americans for Prosperity are...."  [Ugh!]

    Tuesday, August 10, 2010 (in the Rose Garden of the White House):
    "...We do nothing, these educators won't be returning to the classroom this fall, and that won't just deprive them of a pay check, it will deprive children and parents who are counting on them to provide a decent education.  It means the students in Illinois and West Virginia who count on Rachel and Shannon, ah, are going to be, ah, not getting the education that they deserve.  It will deprive countless cities and towns of the law-enforcement officials and first responders who risk their lives to keep us out of harms way...."  [This statement was made before the U.S. House of Representatives would pass on this day a "jobs bills," which, for one, was supposed to supply money to schools districts around the country to save the jobs of teachers, and before Barack Obama would sign the bill into law.].
    "...It will cost us jobs at a time when we need to be creating jobs.  Another words, it will take us backwards at a time when we need to keep this country movin' forward.  This proposal is fully paid for, in part by closing tax loopholes that encourage corporations to shift American jobs overseas.  It will not add to our deficit, and the money will only go towards saving the jobs of teachers and other essential professionals...."  [This statement was made before Barack Obama would sign the jobs bill that would finally pass completely through the U.S. Congress on this day.  In 2009, the "stimulus act"--the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009--had a feature in which money (about eighty-seven billion) went to public schools to hire more teachers and raise the pay of teachers, and it was done at a time when it was clear that a number of states, such as Michigan and California, had governments that had overspent and could be thought of as out of money.  On this date, some state governments and local governments in the country were still in trouble because of overspending.  What this jobs bill was was at least a way in which to get teachers to support Barack Obama for having provided them with money and maybe saving their jobs.  Of course, the action was helping to delay bad state governments and bad local governments from getting their financial systems in order.  Incidentally, on this day, USA Today published an article entitled "Federal workers earning double their private counterparts" that noted that, in 2009, the total average pay and all benefits for federal workers was $123,049 and the average pay and all benefits for private-sector workers was $61,051, information of which had come from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.]

Friday, August 13, 2010 (in the State Dining Room of the White House):
    "...But let me be clear.  As a citizen and as President, I believe that Muslims have the right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country.  That includes, that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan in accordance with local laws and ordinances.  This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.  The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country.  That they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are.  The writ of the founders must endure..."  [In my document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and Barack Obama, I talk about the mosque that, around this date, people were working to build in New York City, New York, near where the towers for the World Trade Center stood till they were destroyed on September 11, 2010 (by Islamic Radicals).  People were opposing the building of a mosque so close to where the towers were, since the people understood who Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf--the man behind the making of the mosque--is and what he stands for.  People were not opposing the building of mosques--they were opposing where this particular mosque was being proposed to be put.  All over the country, communities have rules and regulations related to zoning about where all types of buildings can be built, such as from houses to factories and from churches to mosques.  People cannot just put up buildings anywhere--zoning laws exist.  In addition, people who opposed having the mosque built where the towers once stood were not stopping people from practicing a religion--in this case Islam.  So, when you look at what Barack Obama said in the quoted material, you can see that Barack Obama tried to give the impression that Muslims who wish to build the mosque are being discriminated against, and that shows more of what Barack Obama is, a man who wishes to promote religious disharmony and maybe even a religious war.]

Saturday, August 14, 2010:
    "...Well, ya, you know, my intention, ah, was simply let people know, ah, what I thought, which was that, in this country, we treat everybody equally in accordance with the law, ah, regardless of race, regardless of religion.  Ah, I was not commenting--and I will not comment--on the wisdom making a decision, ah, to put a mosque there, and I was commenting very specifically on the right that people have, ah, that dates back to our founding.  That's what our country's about, and I think it's very important that, you know, as, as difficult some of these issues are, that we st, stay focused, dah, on who we are as a people and, and what our values are all about...."  [I say in jest, "Here is another smooth comment and well-said statement from Barack Obama!  Ha!  Now, study this comment and the comment of Barack Obama's that was given on August 13, 2010 (which I have listed in the "Friday, August 13, 2010" section).  You should see that the comment of Saturday is one in which Barack Obama is trying to cover for his previous comment that I list, which shows he supports the mosque.]

Monday, August 16, 2010 (at a fundraising event for Tom Barrett (a Democrat), the mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who is running to be the governor of Wisconsin):
    "...We didn't get to this point by accident.  We got here after nearly ten years of an economic agenda in Washington that was pretty easy to sum up--You cut taxes for millionaires and billionaires, you cut rules for special interest, you cut working folks loose to fend for themselves.  If you're out of a job--tough luck, you're on your own.  Don't have enough money for college--tough luck, you're on your own.  You don't have health insurance--too bad, you're on your own.  That was a philosophy of the last decade--you are on your own...."  [Here is a rule of life--You are on our own, really.  The previous presidential administration--the George W. Bush administration--did not for a bunch of years purposely work to have you fend for yourself or did not subconsciously or consciously work to have you fend for yourself.  Your life really comes down to you doing for yourself--if you wish to be more than a slave.  You should see Barack Obama thinks you should not believe that you should do for yourself or that you should be doing for yourself because you have to do things to get somewhere or get things, and what Barack Obama did here was work to make you think you should accept him--the all powerful federal government--as the provider of what you will have in life and what you will be in life, and Barack Obama was making a promise, focusing of what the government should be giving you, but promises from a defective man, as I have shown Barack Obama to be by showing many of his lies, are not worth much.  Government cannot give everything to everyone--it is impossible--and, certainly, no other man can give you what your life will have and be or give you everything that you think that you should have.  Let me make it clear--Barack Obama's promise is that he will give you a job, and he will give you money for college, and he will give you health-care insurance, et cetera.  And here is another rule of life--You do not get everything in life or you cannot have everything, meaning some things you will not get no matter how hard you try to get them.]
    "...You remember when I was running, we had a little slogan--'Yes we can!'  These guys' slogan is 'No we can't--no on closing loopholes for companies that ship jobs overseas, no on the tax cuts for small businesses, no on the clean-energy jobs, no on the railroad and highway projects.'...."  [Such a collection of nonsense this statement is, but I will only focus on one theme by asking a question--What are the "loopholes" that Barack Obama is talking about?  If a company moves out of the country, it moves, and that is the way life can go.  By the way, a company that moves may have moved because of government policies that made the managers of the company see that they can do better in another country, and if a company moves to another country, jobs are lost in this country.  It seems to me Barack Obama was hinting that companies that leave are able to get involved in various types of tax "loopholes" for having moved, but, really and ultimately, that is nonsense, since, for one, if a company moves, it is not that the company will be avoiding the days of having to pay taxes--other countries impose taxes on businesses--and if Barack Obama closes whatever "loopholes" he is talking about, I would not be surprised if companies will work to do less business in this country.]

Tuesday, August 17, 2010:
    "...And, and at the end, there, wrapped up in a big bow for me when I arrived was a one-point-three-trillion-dollar deficit...."  [Again Barack Obama pushed the idea that he inherited a big deficit, hoping people will forget that he has increased the deficit many times over since he took the office of the President of the United States of America, which is now, in essence, bankrupt so much more than when he took office.]

Tuesday, August 31, 2010 (a speech from the Oval Office):
    "...Thank you...."  [On this day, Barack Obama, who had openly spoke out against the "surge" by the U.S. military in Iraq about three years earlier, made a speech from the Oval Office of the White House, and the main topic was that U.S. combat troops were no longer in Iraq, having been moved out about two weeks previously.  Barack Obama sat in a chair before a desk, and behind him were such things as photographs of his family and the U.S. flag, and he was sitting before windows, beyond which was the dark of evening, and since Barack Obama was sitting before the windows and had dark hair, his hair seemed to disappear and only his face and ears showed.  During the speech, Barack Obama barely moved; for example, his hands only moved a couple times.  Barack Obama said little that I can comment on--he did announce to the enemy when the U.S. military would start to leave Afghanistan, which would be in about a year.  The "thank you" that I reported for this section was directed at the audience at the end of the speech and not at the military, and the "thank you" is all that I present of a boring speech, which was Barack Obama's second speech from the Oval Office.  By the way, in 2007, U.S. Senator Barack Obama publicly said, for example: "...I am not persuaded that twenty-thousand additional troops in Iraq, ah, is gonna solve the sectarian violence, there.  In fact, I think it'll do the reverse.  I think it takes pressure off the Iraqis to arrive at the sort of a political accommodation that every observer believes is the ultimate solution, ah, to the problems we face there.  So, ah, I am gonna actively oppose the President's proposal [the 'surge']...."]

    Monday, September 6, 2010 (doing yet another speech, this time in Milwaukee, Wisconsin):
    "...Some of you remember I stood right here with you two years ago, when I was still a candidate for this office.  And during that campaign, we talked about how, for years, the values of hard work and responsibility that has built this country has been getting short shrift and how it was slowly hollowing out our Middle Class.  ...Everybody who has a chair, go ahead and sit down...."  [I say, "Everybody, get ready for more nonsense and filler."]
    "...I'm goin' be talkin' for a while...."   [I say, "And so what else is new?"]
    "...Milwaukee, it was folks like you that built this city.  It was folks like you that built this state.  It was folks like you who forged that Middle Class all across the nation.  It was working men and women who made the Twentieth Century--the American Century.  It was the Labor Movement that helped secure so much of what we take for granted today--the forty-hour work week, the minimum wage, family leave, health insurance, Social Security, Medicare, retirement plans...."  [It was all people who did work--even the so-called rich--who made the country what is, but Barack Obama does not like the so-called rich, which is why they get no mention.  Today, Social Security and Medicare are poorly run by the government, as they have been for decades, and both are, in essence, bankrupt.  In addition, retirement programs were not created by the Labor Movement specifically, since retirement programs have existed, such as as pensions, for a long, long time.]
    "...We did it by investing in the people who built this country from the ground up--the workers, Middle Class families, small-business owners...."   [Around the time that Barack Obama said this set of words his subject was building America, and here I only cover this one sentence.  Who is the "we" in the statement?  Government did not "invest" in people to make the country work and grow.  For example, Mill Creek, which is part of museum complex in Michigan today, was created in the 1600s as one of the first businesses in the mid-northern region of the continent and on land that would become a part of Michigan many decades later (and it was founded by businessmen), and the businesses that have come and gone since the 1600s--especially since the late 1700s when the country was founded--were not spurred on by government.  Again I ask, "Who is the 'we' in the statement?"  Barack Obama was trying to teach "idiots," often young people or naive young people, that government "invested" money in some way to created and develop the country from the 1700s to today.]
    "...I want America to have the best infrastructure in the world.  We used to have the best infrastructure in the world.  We can have it again...."  [This statement was made made by Barack Obama while he was promoting his idea of spending money to build, for example, roads and runways.  What is the source that Barack Obama has used to base his statement that the America no longer has the "best infrastructure in the world"?   I guess everybody in the country is going to become a road worker!  And who will do the other jobs, if the jobs exist?]
    "...Over the next six yeeks--over the next six years--we are going to rebuild one-hundred-and-fifty-thousand miles of our roads.  That's enough to circle the world six times...."  [I say, "So?"  Road work goes on all the time, as it has for year and decades.  I worked at AAA Michigan for 27 years and reported on road projects all the time in Michigan.]
    "...We gonna restore a hundred-fifty miles of runways...."  [Yes, he used "a hundred-fifty miles of runways."]
    "...We're gonna advance the next generation air-traffic control systems to reduce travel time and delays for American travelers...."  [Okay!  How will redoing air-traffic control systems make traveling faster?  Planes run and fly at certain speeds, and the weather can really mess up the launch schedules and landing schedules!  Air-traffic guys and gals can only deal with planes as the planes come.]
    "...This is a plan that will be fully paid for.  It will not add to deficit over time...."  [Barack Obama passed out a big lie here.  The country is already broke.  Barack Obama says that his plan to spend more money--billions of dollars--will not add to the "deficit over time."  Barack Obama is full of crap!  By the way, the entire theme of the speech was to promote the passing of another "jobs bill."]
    "...Now, anybody who thinks that we can move this economy forward with just a few folks at the the top doin' well, hopefulling that it's gonna trickle down to working people who are running faster and faster, you'll never see it.  If that's what you're waiting for, you should stop waiting, 'cause it's never happened in our history.  That's not how America was built.  It's wasn't built with a bunch of folks at the top doin' well and everybody else scramblin'.  We didn't become the most prosperous country in the world just by rewarding greed and recklessness.  We didn't come this far by letting the special interests run wild...."  [I will not comment on this truly embarrassing set of words, but I will note that, when I saw the video of this section of speech, I was struck by how stupid-looking the people standing behind him--who had been cheering for him--seemed to be.  Incidentally, the event was the "AFL-CIO Labor Fest."]

    Thursday, September 9, 2010 (on Good Morning, America):
    "...What, eh, what every economist that I've talked to has said is that, if you're gonna spend, say ninety-five-billion dollars, even just for two years before these tax cuts, probably the least efficient way that actually given the economy a boost is to provide that ninety-five-billion dollars to millionaires and billionaires.  I mean if, if, if Warren Buffett gets a tax break, that's not gonna change his spending patterns...."   [How many economists has Barack Obama talked with?  Has he talked with one economist?  Has he talked with two economists?  What is the number?  Why types of "economists" has he talked with?  Since Barack Obama is at least a communist, did he only talk with "economists" who promote the communist way?  Did he talk with bad economists or with those who are not good economists?   Why did Barack Obama mention millionaires and billionaires?  Why did Barack Obama, whose family made $5,505,509.00 in 2009, bring up the idea of Warren Buffett?  What do Warren Buffett's spending patterns have to do with anything related to you?  Do you even understand what Barack Obama said?  (Stolberg, Sheryl Gay.  "Obamas Report Earnings of $5.5 Million in 2009." The New York Times, 15 April 2010.)]

    Friday, September 10, 2010 (at a question-and-answer Press Conference):
    "...Ah.  No.  As, as, as I said, ah, Jacob [Jake Tapper], the, I haven't read the entire study...."  [On this day, Barack Obama held his first news conference in more than three months, and it was a long drawn-out affair, during which Barack Obama rambled often, showing signs of a man with an incoherent-thinking mind, and Barack Obama stuttered often, not being able to read from teleprompters, which Barack Obama is well known for doing.  And, by the way, Barack Obama even used the wrong name for a reporter.]
    "...Ah, but, ah, you know, if, if, if what the reports true, what they're saying is as a consequence of us getting thirty-million addition people health care, at the margins that's gonna increase our cost.  We knew that.  We didn't think that we were gonna cover thirty-million people for free...."  [Yes, here is an example of Barack Obama's stuttering.]
    "...These proposals include a more generous permanent extension of the tax credit that goes to companies for all the research and inevad, and innovation that they do here in America...."  [There was another "Oops" moment from the man that Democrats and the many in the main media have exclaimed is one of the smartest men and best speakers ever.]
    "...We also announced a six-year plan to rebuild America's roads and railrays [railways] and runways...."  [Here was yet another "Oops" incident.]
    "...I could not agree more.  I understand there in, there's an election comin' up....  [This was another "Oops" moment that my representation does not do justice to.]
    "...But, today, I'm happy to announce Austan Goolsbee as her replacement...."  [No, this was not an "Oops" moment--Austan Goolsbee's last name is pronounced as "Ghouls-bee."]
    "...But then the long-term trend in terms of how much the average family is gonna pay for health insurance is going to be improved as a consequence of health care...."  [Of course, during this event, Barack Obama told lies, and this statement is one example.]
    "...Ninety-seven percent of Americans make less than two-hundred-fifty-thousand dollars a year--two-hundred-fifty-thousand a year or less.  And I'm saying we can give those families--nine-seven percent--permanent tax relief.  And, by the way, fer those who make more than two-hundred-fifty-thousand dollars, they'd still get tax relief on the first two-hundred-fifty-thousand dollars, they just wouldn't get it for income above that.  Now, that seems like a commonsense thing to do...."  [Barack Obama also said things that should never be forgotten, and this set of words is one.]
    "...If, if, if, if you want the same kind of skewed policies that led us to this crisis, then, ah, you know, the Republicans are ready to offer that...."  [It was an "Oops" moment combined with nonsense.]
    "...I'll have further remarks tomorrow, but, for now, let me just note, ah, that tomorrow's a national day of service and remembrance, and I hope each of us finds a way to serve our fellow citizens, not only to reaffirm our deepest values as America's but to rekindle that spirit of unity and common purpose, ah, that we felt in the days that followed that September morning...."  [A "day of national service" is what a communist would talk about--a day to volunteer and work for the government--but tomorrow is not a "day of national service"--it is the anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attack on the United States of America.]
    "...And, and, well, the, eh, and so, um, you know, there is no doubt...."  [Smooth, smooth, very smooth--that was what Barack Obama was not on this day.]

    [Note: It must be remembered, in January 2007, Joseph Biden (now the Vice President of the United States of America) made this statement about Barack Obama: "...I mean, you've got the first sort of mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and, and, and clean and a nice-looking guy.  I mean, that's a story book, man..."]

    Wednesday, September 15, 2010 (at an annual awards dinner of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute):
    "...Long before America was even an idea, this land of plenty was home to many peoples--the British and French, to Dutch and Spanish, to Mexican, to countless Indian tribes.  We all shared the same land.  We didn't always get along...."  [Here is a bit of history to keep in mind: In the 1500s, Spanish-based people who came to what is now considered Mexico wiped out and killed a lot of Indian-type peoples, such as Aztecs, through war, and, during the period, the Spaniards brought diseases, such as smallpox, that killed people, and Mexicans came out of the citizens of Spain who came to what would become Mexico, which became a recognized country in 1821.  I have presented the history note because--it seems to me--Barack Obama was playing to Mexicans through the speech, which I cannot show though a text version of his spoken words--Barack Obama emphasized "Mexican" and got applause when he did.  You must remember Barack Obama seems to support the "La Raza" movement, which you can learn about by reading my document entitled "La Raza": Yet Another Enemy in the United States of America, which can be reached through this "La Raza" link.  The "La Raza" movement is made up of people who want to take control of parts of the Western United States of America and make those parts a part of Mexico, based on the idea that the United States of America took away land from Mexico that they feel belongs to them, and big promoters of the "La Raza"-movement idea are communists.  Remember: Mexicans or Spaniards took way the land from others, such as Axtecs, and those others had taken away the land from animals and bugs, and the animals and bugs had taken way the land from....]
    "...It was faith and fidelity to shared values that we all hold so dear.  'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights--Life and Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.'...."  [The quotation from The Declaration of Independence is: "...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these re Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness....'"]

    Monday, September 20, 2010 (a town-hall event on CNBC):
    "...It's very important that everybody understand this.  What the Republicans are proposing is that we, in addition to that, provide tax relief to primarily millionaires and billionaires.  It would cost us seven-hundred-billion dollars to do it.  On average, millionaires would get a check of a hundred-thousand dollars.  And, by the way, I would be helped by this, so I just want to be clear,  you know, I'm speaking against my own financial interests.  This is a, it is an irresponsible thing for us to do...."  [Here, I will only direct your eyes to the word "cost."  Marxists believe that everything of and in a country belongs to the government, and, for example, that means what you create--even if created by yourself alone--belongs to the government.  So if the government is letting you keep a little more of the money that you make by working for a company, that money that you are getting to keep is being given up by the government, and that money that is being given up by the government--according to the Marxists--belongs to the government, and when money is given up by the government, it hurts the government.  Giving up money is "costly" for a government in the eyes of the Marxists, and Marxists say that a government's giving up money is done at a "cost."  Notice that Barack Obama hinted that giving up $700-million would be costly to the government and would be "irresponsible."]

    Thursday, September 23, 2010 (at a fund-raising event):
    "...Because of last year's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United, they are now, they are now allowed to spend as much as they want, unlimited amounts of money, and they don't have to reveal who's paying for these ads.  That's what they're doing.  Millions of dollars being spent by, by groups with, you know, harmless-sounding names--Americans for Prosperity, the Committee for Truth in Politics, or Moms for Motherhood.  I made that last one up.  But they pose as non-for-profit social-welfare and trade groups.  Every single one of them, virtually, is guided by seasoned Republican political operatives.  None of them will disclose who is paying for these ads.  They're spending tens of millions of dollars against Democratic candidates without telling the American people where the flood of money is coming from.  You don't know if it's coming from big oil or insurance companies...."  [Barack Obama passed along a lot of crap through this statement.  First, there are limits on how much money individuals can give to entities, which might use the money for political advertising.  Second, Barack Obama--a U.S. President--actually orally attacked entities that support The U.S. Constitution, such as the Americans for Prosperity.  Third, Barack Obama attacked oil companies and insurance companies once again, hoping you will hate those two main types of entities and let him take control of them and dissolve them.  By the way, it is yet unclear where all the money that Barack Obama used during his Presidential election campaign had come from, which could have been, for instance, foreign entities.]

    Tuesday, September 28, 2010 (in Alburquerque, New Mexico)::
    "..I'm, I'm a Christian, ah, by choice.  Ah, you know, my family didn't frankly, they weren't, ah, folks who went to church every, every week.  Ah, my mother was one of the most spiritual people I knew, but she didn't, ah, raise me in the church.  Ah, so, I came to, to, ah, my Christian faith later in life, and it was because of the, the the precepts of Jesus Christ spoke to me in terms of the kind of life that I would want to live, being my brother's and sister's keeper, treating others as they would treat me...."  [The story of Kane and Abel is the story that is related to the idea of what Barack Obama says as "my brother's and sister's keeper," but Barack Obama misuses the idea, and in the case of the story, Kane killed Abel in the story, and the story had nothing to do with Jesus Christ.  That is all that I will say about this statement  (research the story for yourself).  And I present no comments about the next three quoted pieces of material.  Look at the next three.  Do what you will with them, while remembering Barack Obama is a perpetual liar and a spinner of yarns.]
    "...And I think also understanding that, you know, Jesus Christ dying for my sins spoke to the humility we all have to have as human beings--that we're sinful and we're flawed and we make mistakes, ah, and that, dah, we achieve salvation through the grace of God, but what we can do, ah, as, as flawed as we are is still seek out in other people and do our best to help them find their, their own grace, and so that's, ah, that's what I strive to do and that's what I pray to do everyday.  I think my public service, eh, is part of that effort ta, ta express my Christian faith...."
    "...I'm also somebody who deeps believes that part of the bedrock strength of this country is that it embraces people of many faiths and of no faith, that this is a country this is still predominantly Christian, but we have Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, agnostics, Buddhists, and that their own path to grace is one that we have to revere and respect as much as our own, and that's part of what makes this country what it is...."
    "...I appreciate that.  You're exactly right.  We were founded on freedom of religion.  That's, that's how this country got started.  That's why people came here, 'cause there were a bunch of other folks who said you can't worship the way you want, and we have ta constantly I think reaffirm that tradition, even when it sometimes makes us uncomfortable...."

    Tuesday, September 28, 2010 (in Wisconsin):
    "...In every instance, progress took time.  In every instance, progress took sacrifice, progress took faith. You know, the, the slaves sitting around a fire singin' freedom songs, they weren't sure when slavery would end, but they understood it was gonna end.  When women were out there marchin' for the right to vote, they weren't when it was gonna happen, but they kept on goin'.  When workers were organizing for the right to organizing and were being intimidated, they weren't sure when change was gonna come, but they knew it was gonna come...."  [Notice the informal speech pattern that Barack Obama used, which happened to be at a DNC rally, trying to present himself as more like what he might call a worker or more like "them."]
    "...Change, change is gonna come!  Change is gonna come for this generation, if we work for it, if we fight for it, if we believe in it.  The biggest mistake we can make right now is to let disappointment or frustration lead to apathy and indifference.  That is how the other side wins!  And I want everybody to be clear.  Make no mistake, if the other side does win, they'll ...the next two years fighting for the very same policies that led to this recession in the first place...."  [Although I present this material to you in text form, you should be able to see, while reading the material, an image in your mind of Barack Obama's talking like some sort of Reverend Jeremiah Wright-like preacher (Reverend Jeremiah Wright is a radical preacher who preaches, for example, Black Liberation Theology and hate of the United States of America).  In your mind, you should be able to see Barack Obama working hard to stir up the crowd, as a rabble-rouser would.  In your mind, you should see Barack Obama is not acting like a President or talking like a President.  And you should see in your mind more lies wrapped around his head like a fog.  Remember: To see what really was the underlying cause of the recession, you should see my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, which can be reached by using this link: Logic.]

    Wednesday, September 29, 2010 (in Des Moines, Iowa):
    "...But I also have make sure that we are paying our bills and that we're not adding, putting off debt for the future generation...."  [Between January 20, 2009, and September 29, 2010, as the U.S. President, Barack Obama signed more pieces of legislation--big pieces of legislation--to create more new debt than any previous President between roughly 1776 and 2009 had.  That is fact!  This is fact--Barack Obama is a lying about what he is making sure gets done.]
    "...In the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003, we lopped off taxes and we did not pay for it, and that is the single largest contributor to the debt and deficit...."  [I do hope you notice Barack Obama not only lied by making this statement but also talked like a Marxist--using "did not pay for it."  Tax cuts are not "costs" that have to be paid for.  Taxes cuts are only loss of tax revenue for the government.  To a man--particularly a politician--who thinks he owns everything in a country, which is the way of the Marxist, tax cuts are a loss of money to him.]

    Wednesday, September 29, 2010 (at the Southampton Recreation Association in Richmond, Virginia):
    "...Ah, last week, the Republicans put forward, ah, what they called a 'Pledge to America,' which purported to say we're gonna cut your taxes and we're also going to control spending and somehow balance the budget.  But when you actually looked at the numbers, it was hard to figure out how they all added up.  I'm, I'm not a math teacher.  Ah, but I, I know a little bit about math.  So when you add it all up, um, essentially the proposal would drastically expand the deficit, instead of shrinking it...."  [If you reduce the revenue taken in through taxes by the government and, at the same time, cut back on the amount of spending by the goverment, you do not increase the deficit--if you reduce the amount of spending by a greater amount than you reduce the cutting back on tax revenue.  ]

    Thursday, September 30, 2010 (at a Democratic National Committee event in Washington, D.C.):
    "...So that's the progress that we've made.  As a testimony to you, that's the progress that we've worked so hard for in 2008.  So, we're not done.  We're not close to being finished, but for the hole we're climbing out of is a deep one, deeper than the last three recessions combined...."  [Eh!  I am well aware Barack Obama has been enacting laws that are keeping the recession active.  Everything Barack Obama is doing is being done on purpose!]
    "...They have these innocuous names, like, ah, Americans for Prosperity or Americans for Apple Pie.  Moms for motherhood...."  [The topic was so-called special-interest groups.  Here, Barack Obama again attacked publicly the real entity known as the "Americans for Prosperity," which is made up of "conservatives" and "non-enslavers" (who are not communists or socialists, as Barack Obama is).  But here Barack Obama made up the entity called "Americans for Apple Pie."  Barack Obama was making a joke.  To me, Barack Obama's using "Americans for Apple Pie" shows that Barack Obama dislikes "America" and that idea of "American Apple Pie."  Yes, Barack Obama made up "Moms for motherhood," too.]

    Saturday, October 2, 2010 (on the White House YouTube channel):
    "...My administration has made a historic commitment to promote clean-energy technology.  This will mean hundreds of thousands of new American jobs by 2012--jobs for contractors to install energy-saving windows and insulation, jobs for factory workers to build high-tech vehicle batteries, electric cars, and high-bred trucks, jobs for engineers and construction crews to create wind farms and solar plants that are gonna double the renewable energy we can generate in this country.  These are the jobs building the future...."  [So, on this day, Barack Obama promised that hundreds of thousands of jobs were going to be created in relation to clean energy by 2012.  On Friday, October 8, 2010, the federal government would release more data about employment in the country, and it would note that the there was a net loss of jobs in the country for September 2010 of at least 18,000 (which would not take into account census jobs that were eliminated), that the private sector gained about 64,000 jobs in September 2010, that the U6 (or what I call full-unemployment rate) is at 17.1 (it was 16.1 a year ago), and that 14.8 million persons are out of work.  The way I look at it, Barack Obama may--may--see a hundreds of thousands of jobs create in the clean-energy sector by 2010, but a lot of people are going to be out of work for a lot longer given what jobs are being created in the other fields of the private sector and given what jobs are being lost in the public sector (at least 76,000 in September 2010) these days. (Meteor Blades.  "Crunch: Another rotten jobs report, U6 surges to 17.1%."  Daily Kos, 8 October 2010, 06:07:01 a.m. PDT.)]

    Monday, October 4, 2010 (at the White House Summit on Community Colleges):
    "...That's why I so strongly disagree with the economic plan that was released last week by the Republican leaders in Congress, which would actually cut education by twenty percent.  It would reduce or, or eliminate financial aid for eight-million college students, and it would leave community colleges without the resources they need to meet the goals we've talked about today.  Instead, this money would help pay for a seven-hundred-billion-dollar tax cut that only two-percent of the wealthiest Americans would ever see, an average of a hundred-thousand for every millionaire and billionaire in the country, and that just doesn't make sense--not for students, not for our economy....."  [About ten years ago, I read a book about "Normal Schools," which were schools of the 1800s and 1900s that were, in essence, that taught young men and young women to be teachers in elementary schools and such of the periods, and I thought about such schools when I heard this statement from Barack Obama (the book was A History of the Michigan State Normal School by Daniel Putnam, and it was published in 1899).  Communities started up schools in the 1700s and 1800s and later, and, over the years, community colleges were created by communities or evolved out of smaller schools, and some of the Normal Schools became universities, such as Eastern Michigan University (which is located in Michigan).  Community colleges are colleges operated by the communities in which they exist.  It now looks as if Barack Obama is working to get control of community colleges; this year, the federal government--through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act--took control of the student-loan system in the country.  And, of course, Barack Obama spoke "crap" on this day, as can be seen through the quotation presented by me.]

    Wednesday, October 6, 2010 (on Michael Baisden's syndicated radio show):
    "...ah, to take back the House, maybe take back the Senate.  And if they're successful doing that, they've already said they're gonna back to the same policies that, dah, were in place during the Bush administration, and that means that we are gonna have, ah, just hand-to-hand combat up here on Capitol Hill.  We're not gonna be able to keep on making progress..."  [Consider two points.  Here, Barack Obama tried to convince people hat only Democrats are really working to make progress in the country or for the country, and that is nonsense.  Here, Barack Obama talked like a thug, noting that there is going to be "hand-to-hand combat," and since Barack Obama likes to use coercion, this statement shows more of his nature--his gutter nature.]

    Thursday, October 7, 2010 (in Maryland):
    "...Government should do for the people what they cannot do better for themselves...."  [I ask--What is is that Barack Obama thinks people can do better for themselves?]
    "...And, by the way, thanks to a recent Supreme Court decision, they are being helped this year like we've never seen before by special-interest groups that are spending unlimited amounts of money on attack ads, and then they don't disclose whose behind them.  Because of the Supreme Court law, they don't have to disclose who's behind it.  It could be the oil companies.  It could be the insurance industry.  It could be Wall Street.  You don't know!...."  [I ask--Have I not heard such nonsense from Barack Obama in the past?]

    Friday, October 8, 2010:
    "...This morning, we learned that in the month of September, our economy gained sixty-four-thousand jobs in the private sectors--in July and August, private-sector jobs numbers were revised upwards.  So we've now seen nine straight months of private-sector job growth, in all more than eight-hundred-and-fifty-thousand private-sector jobs gained this year, which is in sharp contrast to the almost eight-hundred-thousand jobs that we were losing, ah, when I first took office...."  [Okay!  Go back to the entry for Saturday, October 2, 2010, and read the statistics, and then come back here.  What I did not note in the entry for Saturday, October 2, 2010, is that the July--refigured--nonfarm-unemployment statistic went from minus 54,000 to minus 66,000 and that the August unemployment figure went from minus 54,000 to minus 57,000.]
    "...I should point out that these continuing layoffs by state and local governments of teachers and police officers and firefighters and alike would have been even worse without the federal help that we provided to states over the last twenty months, help that the Republicans in Congress have consistently opposed.  I think the Republican position doesn't make much sense, especially since the weakness in public-sector employment is a drag on the private sector as well.  So we need to continue to explore ways that we can help states and local governments maintain workers who provide vital services...."  [Yes, the federal government--in essence, Barack Obama--did send money to states and local governments, which was only short-term-available money, and, for the most part, those entities did not really work to cut spending, so they should be looking for more federally distributed money to keep them afloat, and that means those entities' bloated structures are still a drag on the country--producing nothing but more defective laws, wasted paper, and unneeded agency projects and such.]
    "...And I believe that, instead of siting still, we should invest in rebuilding America's roads and railways and runways.  Too many American workers have been out of work for months, even years, and that doesn't do anybody any good when there's so much of America to rebuild...."  [Wow!  Barack Obama is back on the "roads" again.  Wow!  So what!]

    Sunday, October 10, 2010 (in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for an election-related rally):
    "...See what they're counting on, what they're counting on is you're gonna stay home.  They're counting on your silence.  They're counting on your amnesia.  They're counting on your apathy.  They're counting on young people stayin' home and union members stayin' home and black folks stayin' home...."  [Basically, Barack Obama yelled out these words, working to rile up the audience, and, basically, Barack Obama did not sound like a U.S. President, he sounded like a getto street thug trying to charge up his gang into committing a beating or running a riot.]

    Tuesday, October 12, 2010 (a town-hall meeting Web cast):
    "...What's happening in this election is unprecedented, because what we're seeing--partly as a consequence of a Supreme Court called Citizens United--is the ability of special interests to mobilize millions of dollars from donors who are undisclosed to run negative ads at levels that are outspending in some cases the candidates themselves or the parties.  We don't know if it's being paid for by oil companies who don't like some of our environmental positions.  We don't know if they're being run by banks who are frustrated by some our financial positions.  We don't know if they're being funded by foreign corporations.  Because they're not disclosed...."  [Around Sunday, October 10, 2010, the Democratic Party--headed by Barack Obama--was attacking the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, making an accusation--and providing no proof--that it possibly had been and was taking foreign money and using that money in ad campaigns against Democrats who are running for office; for example, on Sunday, October 10, 2010, the host of Face the Nation played a commercial from the Democratic National Committee that implied that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce was taking foreign money and using it in ads (and this was done while the guest was David Axelrod, a Senior Advisor to Barack Obama).  What you have in this quotation from Barack Obama is a man making unfounded and unsubstantiated accusations publicly against some entities--those that are not anti-The U.S. Constitution--and what you have a a U.S. President lying and attacking the all business people in the country--from operators of dress shops, who can be members of chambers of commerce or the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to operators of fudge shops, et cetera.  Such an angry evil little boy Barack Obama is.]

    Tuesday, October 12, 2010 (at George Washington University):
    "...So we have made some huge changes over the last twenty months, and we can make more, but we're not there yet, we're not where we need to be yet, and this election is gonna help determine whether we can continue on this path so that America finally takes on these tough challenges...."  [Okay, let us look at this statement in a different way.  "So we have made some huge changes over the last twenty months"--to me, Barack Obama was saying that he has made huge changes, making changes that, for example, are bankrupting the country and turning the country into some type of communist-like entity.  "We can make more"--yes, Barack Obama and his associates can make more changes that will hurt the country and kill the country as it was founded and move the country more toward being the socialist-type country or worse.  "We're not there yet, we're not where we need to be yet"--it means we have not yet created that new country of socialism and communism and enslavism.  "This election is gonna help determine whether we can continue on this path"--with this, Barack Obama was saying: My minions and followers--communists and socialists and deviants alike--you have to work harder to get people to the poles and vote for the Democrats (communists and the like) or we cannot make a Marxist country or we will have to wait longer for the Marxist country to appear fully and be developed fully.]
    "...And one of the most frustrating things is the ads that the names of these groups are all really innocuous sounding.  Right?  There's Americans for Prosperity and, ah, you know, Moms for Motherhood and--I, I made that one up, but you get the idea...."  [Eh!]

    Thursday, October 14, 2010 (on a televised town-hall meeting in Washington, D.C., on, for example, MTV):
    "...I think there are a lot of people who are in the 'tea party' who have very real and sincere concerns about spending that's out of control or generally philosophically believe that the government should be less involved, ah, in certain aspects of American life rather than more involved, and they have every right, ah, and obligation as citizens to be involved and engaged in this process.  Ah, I do think that what has happened is on, layered on top of some of that, ah, general frustration that is expressed itself through the 'tea party,' there is an awful lot of corporation money that's pouring into these elections right now.  I mean, you got tens of millions of dollars in what are called third-party expenditures that are being spent basically on negative ads--I mean about eighty-six, ninety percent of them are negative ads, and you guys have probably seen 'em more than I do because I don't watch that much TV--but if you're in a battleground state right now, you are being bombarded with negative ads every single day and nobody knows who's paying for these ads.  They've got these names like Americans for Prosperity...." [Here, Barack Obama gave away his belief of what government should be, and Barack Obama attacked corporations and special interests--only those that he does not like--again.  Barack Obama talked about the 'tea-party' movement and hinted at the idea that some 'tea-party' people have a belief that the government should be less involved in certain aspects of American life, but when you look over the first two lines of the text, you can get the feeling Barack Obama is against that idea--Barack Obama does not have the belief that some "sincere" tea-party people have, and, here, Barack Obama, who made his remarks for impressionable young persons, was hinting at the idea that those 'tea-party' people are misguided and need to see the light--his light.  In addition, in this piece of quoted material, Barack Obama put down "corporate money" again and tried to show how evil it is that users of that money are--supposedly--not disclosing who is behind the ads (of course, Barack Obama did not mention who was behind all the money that he got to run for the office of the U.S. President around 2008, much of which in relation to where it came is still unknown and unreported to the public).  And, yes, Barack Obama pushed the idea that those corporations are behind all those negative ads and that ads tied to people that he supports--other Democrats (or, really,  communists and the like)--are not involved in negative ads, and Barack Obama was working to get his audience to discard those negative ads--for one, since they are backed by corporate money.]

    Wednesday, October 20, 2010 (at a campaign rally in Portland, Oregon, for John Kitzhaber (a Democrat), who is running for the position of governor of Oregon):
    "...Don't let 'em tell ya that change isn't possible, 'cause here's what I know, if our parents, if our grandparents, if our great-grandparents listened to the cynics fifty years ago or hundred years ago or two-hundred years ago, we wouldn't be here tonight.  Think about it!  Those Thirteen Colonies wouldn't had the courage ta start a revolution...."  [I say, "What the heck was he talking about?  What was his audience supposed to think about?  He mentioned--"cynics."  Who were the cynics and what were the cynics putting down during their various times?  What were the subjects and the topics at the different times--fifty years ago, one-hundred years ago, and two-hundred years ago?  What was the basis of Barack Obama's presentation?  He simply said words and made no sense.]

    Thursday, October 21, 2010 (in Seattle, Washington, and on the campaign trail for Democrats):
    "...You know, I, I think that one of the challenges we had two years ago was we had to move so fast--we were in such emergency mode--that it was very difficult for us ta spend a lot of time doin' victory laps and advertising exactly what we were doing because we had to move on to the next thing, and, ah, eh, eh, I, I take some responsibility for that.  I mean our attitude was we just had to get the policy right, and we did not always think about making sure we were advertising properly what was going on.  Ah, but I think that we had the opportunity now, ah, that the economy is more stabilized ta be as clear as possible to folks about what we've done...."  [Here are more lies, since, for example, Barack Obama did not have to advertise to make clear what things he was doing--all bad--because I knew what he was doing was bad, as did, probably, millions and millions a millions of persons.  Oh, yes, Barack Obama, here, showed that he takes some of the blame for not making it clear what he was doing.  I say sarcastically, "Big crap."  Barack Obama did not want to advertising, so what is he taking the blame for and what can he take blame for, given he purposely did not say anything or lied?]
    "...In the long term, what I've said, when people start seeing its impact on, on folks and I think as more and more people see that the traditional health care that they got through their employer is being threatened by higher premiums and higher deductible and is less reliable than it might have, ah, been before, ah, I think that, you know,  we're gonna look back twenty years from now and say this was absolutely the right thing to do...."  [Here, Barack Obama was trying to calm "folks" (as he might say) through a prediction that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 will be looked at as great in twenty years.  It was a prediction based on no fact, or it was a statement presented with no supporting facts, and it can be said that the prediction is a lie, since smarter men and women than Barack Obama is have already shown in good detail that that federal act is going to harm the country.  (I have already heard of big problems that the act is already causing, which I cannot present them here; you can look them up in news stories.)  To ignorant people, Barack Obama's authoritative presentation probably was convincing and believable.  Believe me, believe me--Barack Obama  was and is hoping.  I do not!  I am smarter than Barack Obama is.  And what Barack Obama was implying is wait twenty years and you will see--just wait.  However, in twenty years, it will be too late to fix all the problems in a short period of time--it will take decades and decades.]

    Monday, October 25, 2010 (on Univision radio):
    "...I am President, I am not king.  I can't do these things just by myself.  If Latinos sit out the election, instead of saying we're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are importance to us--if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election--then I think it's gonna be harder, and that's why I think it's so important that people focus on November 2...."  [I say that Barack Obama is a thug, and, over the last twenty months or so, he has proved it, and this statement is more proof that Obama is a thug.  In public, have you ever heard a U.S. President use the word "punish" in a presentation designed to promote a get-out-the-vote idea?  I also say, more specifically, that Barack Obama is a "punisher."  Barack Obama showed that, if "Latinos" do not join him in the fight--in the fight to punish his enemies, many people, especially "whites," in the United States of America--they will not be rewarded and they will be punished.  Yes, Barack Obama is a "race-baiter," pushing the Hispanics or Latinos to take the war to the "whites" in the United States of America, and, yes, Barack Obama is working to promote hate!  His man--Barack Obama--is an evil man who has to be opposed at all costs forever!]
    "...Many Republicans that used to support comprehensive-immigration reform, like John McCain, decided not to support it..  The problem that we have is, is that, until I can get some cooperation from the other side, then people who are anti-immigration reform can continue to block it, and that's why this election coming up is so important because we essentially have to say that those who are politicizing the issue, who are supportive of the Arizona law, who talk only about border security but aren't willing to talk about other aspects of this, who don't support the 'Dream Act,' who are out there engaging in rhetoric that is divisive and damaging, those aren't the kinds of folks who represent our core American values...."  [Eh!  Eh!  Eh!  Go suck on drywall, Barack Obama!]

    Tuesday, October 26, 2010 (on Al Sharpton's syndicated radio show):
    "...A lot of your listeners may live in places where there's early voting, and if you got early vote, take advantage of it now...."  [Al Sharpton calls himself "Reverend Al Sharpton," and what Al Sharpton is is a radical black, and what Barack Obama said on the show is not important (for this part of this section), and what is importance is that a U.S. President--in this case Barack Obama--made appearance on a show hosted by a known race-baiter, but it must be kept in mind that Barack Obama is a race-baiter and racist, so Back Obama racked up another low standard for the office of the U.S. Presidency.]
    "...And if they control Congress that means that, ah, I'm going to be fighting with them day and night just to preserve, ah, the college student loan programs that young people are already benefiting from.  Ah, and that's just one example of the kinds of choices that, dah, folks have to take really seriously in this election...."  [Okay, here we go!  College-loan programs have existed for decades.   Maybe, your parents used college loans so that they could take classes at college or university.  And those loan programs were, in essence, provided through the private sector.  Oops!  Through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, the federal government took over control of almost the entire college-loan-program system in the country.  However, persons can still--if they have the necessary collateral--get loans for colleges or universities through the private section, but few people will do that, because that way of getting loans--with collateral--had not been the common way even before the Patient Protection and Affordable Car Act of 2010 was made.  Yes, Barack Obama was trying to push the idea that Republicans would kill all college-loan programs, and that is a lie and that is more crap from the defective mind of Barack Obama!]

    Wednesday, October 27, 2010 (seen on The Daily Show on Comedy Central):
        "...Ah...."  [My presenting what the "dude"--it was Jon Stewart, the host of The Daily Show, who called him "dude"--said beyond this one word is useless.  I simply note in this section another incident in which Barack Obama appeared on television.  But do not worry, Barack Obama will be on the road again, as I note in the next section.]

    Sunday, October 31, 2010 (at an election rally in Cleveland, Ohio):
    "...We've gotta get Cleveland out to vote!  We've gotta get everybody in Ohio out to vote.  And in Ohio, you can vot early!  There is early voting just a few blocks from here, so you can go right after this rally, if you haven't voted, because if everyone who fought for change in 2008 shows up to vote in 2010, we will win this election!  I'm confident about it!...."  [In jest, I say, "Wow, how inspiring the 'community organizer' is."]

    Wednesday, November 3, 2010 (a press conference in Washington, D.C.):
    "...And yesterday's vote confirmed what I've heard from folks all across America.  People are frustrated.  They're deeply frustrated with the pace of our economic recovery, ah, and the opportunities, ah, that they hope for their children and their grandchildren.  They want jobs to come back faster.  They want paychecks to go further.  And they want the ability to give their children the same chances and opportunities that as they've had in life...."  [For nearly one hour, Barack Obama was involved in another press conference, much time of which was made up of Barack Obama's rambling and regular presentation of lies, and, in this section, I only look at statements made during the first fifteen minutes of the event, not wishing to waste too much time.  Through this set of quoted words from Barack Obama, Barack Obama tried to argue well that the people who are against the Democrats, especially him, are only frustrated by 'the pace of our economic recovery.'"  First, there is not an economic recovery yet, given that the full unemployment rate in the country is about seventeen percent.  Second, in truth, people who are against the Democrats, especially Barack Obama, are aware that Barack Obama and other Democrats have done things that are against The U.S. Constitution and are being purposely done to damage the country, given that Barack Obama and his associates are black radicals or communists or socialists....]
    "...The men and women who sent us here don't expect Washington to solve all their problems, but they do expect Washington to work for them--not against them.  They want to know their tax dollars are being spent wisely--not wasted--and that we're not gonna leave our children a legacy of debt.  And they want to know that their voices aren't being drowned out by a sea of lobbyists and special interests and partisan bickering...."  [First, the federal government under Barack Obama is indeed working against the people of the country, since many in the government, especially Barack Obama, are working to strengthen the government--make it more communist or Marxist.  Second, over the last nearly two years, Barack Obama has not spent money wisely, and yet he made this statement about spending money wisely.  Third, I ask this--How does "partisan bickering" drown out the voices of the people?]
    "...Now none of the challenges we face lend themselves to simple solutions or bumper-sticker slogans, nor are the answers found in any one particular philosophy or ideology.   As I've said before, no person, no party has a monopoly on wisdom.  And that's why I'm eager to hear good ideas wherever they come from, whoever proposes them, and that's why I believe it's important to have an honest and civil debate about the choices that we face....."  [First, Barack Obama has shown over the nearly last two years that he does not listen to people who are not socialists or communists or black radicals or whatever.  Second, I say and can argue well that a person who believes in communism and such other defective ideologies is not wise, and I say that communists and such have no wisdom at all.   Third, I say that Barack Obama is an ignorant man.]
    "...I do believe there is hope for civility.  I do believe there's hope for progress...."  [During the week of Monday, November 1,  2010, one series of reports on Today, a weekday program broadcast by NBC-TV, which is a highly left-wing entity, focused on civility (or whether or not civility is dead in the country), and what left-wing people want non-left-wing people to do is be civil--not fight back against them, not fight for individual freedom, not fight against "enslavism," which is practiced and promoted by people who are like Barack Obama.]
    "...I don't think there's anybody in America who thinks that we got an energy policy that works the way it needs to, ah, that, you know, that thinks we shouldn't be working on energy independence, and that gives opportunities for Democrats and Republicans to come together and think about, ah, whether it's natural gas or energy efficiency or how we can build electric cars in this country, how do we move forward on that agenda?...."  [Boy, I could really destroy this piece of  thought, but  I only look at one point.  Let us say that cars weighs 3,500 pounds.  If that is the car we have in mind, a certain amount of energy--whether it comes from gas or electricity--is needed to move the car a given distance, such as two-hundred miles.  How does making electric cars and putting them on the roads save energy?  Electric cars use energy, or electric cars can move because they used electricity, which is produced in some manner.  Notice Barack Obama talked about natural gas, but natural gas is a byproduct of drilling for oil, and on this day, Barack Obama still had an oil drilling moratorium in place for areas related to waters of country.  Barack Obama did not talk about nuclear power or coal power, which will be needed to make electricity to move electric cars, and if the country does not have more nuclear power or coal power, there will not be power to move electric cars.]
    "...But, ah, what is absolutely true is that with all that stuff coming at folks fast and furious--a recovery package, ah, what we had to do with respect to the banks, what we had to do with respect to the auto companies--I, I think people started looking at all this and it felt as if government, ah, was getting much more intrusive into people's lives than they were accustomed to.  Now, ah, the reason was it was an emergency situation, but I think it's understandable that folks said to themselves, 'You know, maybe this is the agenda as opposed to a response to an emergency.'  Ah, and that's something that I think, you know, everybody in the White House understood was a danger, ah, and we thought it was necessary, ah, but, ah, I'm sympathetic to folks who looked at it and said, 'This is looking like potential overreach.'...."  [Here, Barack Obama presented a collage of crap, and, for example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is a big piece of proof!]

    Sunday, November 7, 2010 (an interview by Steve Kroft on 60 Minutes):
    "...What I didn't affectively--I think--drive home is that we were do, taking these steps not because we of some theory that we wanted to expand government, it was because we had an emergency situation, and we wanted to make sure the economy didn't go off a clift.  Ah, I think the Republicans were able to paint my governing philosophy as a classic big-government liberal, ah, and that's not something that the American people want...."  [The interview was recorded on Thursday, November 4, 2010, and the text of Barack Obama's presented here is as it was presented by CBS-TV, which did not broadcast the entire interview and which may have done editing that removed some material from Barack Obama.  This section presents only some of the total number of pieces that I could present.  In this set of words from Barack Obama, you should be able to see at least one lie.  Barack Obama hinted here that, in essence, the Republicans were "painting" a picture or lying about through statements that Barack Obama was a big-government liberal.  But it is true--Barack Obama is a big -government liberal and worse, as can be shown by looking at how much he has added to the debt of the country.]
    "...Exactly, I, I think it's fair to say, ah, it hasn't changed me in terms of my ideals...."  [Here, the theme was Washington has a tendency to change people who go there, and Barack Obama pushed the idea that his "ideals"--which are Marxist and worse--have not changed, and I say that it is true that Barack Obama will continue to be a Marxist and worse.]
    "...Ah, and, ah, you know, when you're campaigning, I think you're, you're liberated to, to say things without thinking about--'Okay, how am I goin' to practically implement this?'...."  [Here, you should be able to see that Barack Obama thinks that, during the campaign season, a politician can just run off the mouth, saying anything, even if it will not work and the politician has no idea how to make it work or whether or not it could ever work.]
    "...These things are hard to.  Ah, you know, this is, ah, ah, a big country, ah, and democracy is an inherently messing business, and Congress is an institution that has a whole lot of traditions--some of them that aren't, ah, you know, all that healthy.   Ah, and there are a lot of special interests who've got a lot of power.  It's a hard long slog, ah, to push up against that.  Ah, but I think you make a good point, Steve, which is that, ah, you now have, ah, a lot of Republicans who ran as outsiders who are coming in, ah, and my hope is that, ah, we may be in a position now where the two sides meet and agree on some things that need to be changed...."  [Here, Barack Obama talked about the messiness of democracy and the unhealthy traditions of Congress, and that shows to me that he would like to remove the messiness and the unhealthy traditions, such as by making the government more like a dictatorship--where one man can set down rules and laws without being blocked by the ways that now exist in the country that are supposed to block and stop dictators.]
    "...Not for the people who are out of work.  Ah, I think that, ah, the way to think about it is the dangers of a second big recession, ah, are now much reduced.  The danger of us tipping into a Great Depression--ah, I think most economists would say, ah, isn't, dah, is not there on the horizon.  Ah, what is a danger is that we stay stuck in a new normal where unemployment rates stay high, people who have jobs, ah, see their incomes go up, businesses make big profits but they've learned to do more with less, ah, and so they don't hire, and as, as consequence we keep on seeing growth that is just too slow to bring back the eight-million jobs that were lost.  That is a danger, so, ah, so that's something I spend a lot of time thinking about...."  [Here, Barack Obama hinted that what he has done has blocked a second big recession and a Great Depression.  Forget those ideas for now.  Notice Barack Obama tried to convince the audience that he is working so hard to come up ways  to make the "new normal" not a reality.  However, in my eyes and in the eyes of most economists probably he has not done anything that will stop the "new normal" from becoming a reality.  Oh, did you see how I used a Barack Obama tactic?  Look over my "however" sentence.  Study it!]
    "...I do get discouraged.  I mean there are times when I thought the economy would, ah, have, have gotten better by now...."  [Eh!  Barack Obama is a liar or an idiot, based on this statement that he made.  I am--for example--one person who was nothing that hints the economy was going to get better for the time period between January 20, 2010, and the present.  And now the country is "monetizing" the debt!  Look up "QE2" (or "quantitative easing two" of the money supply), and read by document entitled The Economic Crash of Countries is Because of Liberalism--It is not because of Capitalism or Conservatism, which can be reached by using this link: Crash.]
    "...Some of this is going to be just a matter of the economy healing.  There are some things we can do to accelerate growth.   ...We've got a couple of trillion-dollars worth of infrastructure improvements that need to be made around the country.  I mean there are construction crews all across the country that are dying for work, and companies are willin' to take a very small profit in order to get work done, and so, ah, for us to say--now's the time for us ta, ta rebuild this country, ah, and equip ourselves for the twenty-first century.  That's, ah, that's somethin' that could make a real difference....."  [Barack Obama has talked about the topic of  road-construction jobs many times in the past.  So, let me see.  It looks as if Barack Obama is going to turn unemployed accountants, unemployed dress makers, unemployed eyeglass makers, unemployed bank cashiers, unemployed bicycle makers, unemployed plumbers, unemployed house makers, unemployed grocery store tellers, unemployed traffic managers, unemployed underwriters, et cetera in to road-construction workers.  I say in jest, "I guess we all gonna be workin' on the Barack Obama's road-construction chain gang."  Who the heck is going to do the other work?]
    "...Ah, I think both Democrats and Republicans agree that, ah, for people makin' $250,000 a year or less, the last thing we want right now is to see their taxes go up--not only would be bad for them but it would be bad for the economy as a whole.  Ah, for folks who are makin' more than $250,000 a year--you and me, Steve--ah...the question is--Can we afford to borrow seven-hundred-billion dollars?"  Here, Steve Kroft interrupt him by saying, "That's what it is?"  "That's how much it would cost over the course of ten years to give us an extra tax break.  Look, I, you know, sometimes I think, ah, ah, this debate gets framed, ah, as if, ah, I, I think rich people--folks who are doin' well--ah, should be punished.  Part, part of what America's all about is goin' out there and gettin' rich, and, you know, if you make a good product, you make, provide a good service, God bless ya.  I want you to do well.  That, and then you can plow that money back into creating jobs and, and, and building your businesses.  Ah, that's terrific.  Ah, what I, what I don't think makes sense is for us to borrow seven-hundred-billion dollars to pay for that.  And we don't have the money!  I mean everybody's already talkin' about our debt and our deficit.  Why would we want to add to it?...."  [This part of the section is the big piece of nonsense.  The theme was the tax rates that were supposed to soon expire, which had been set, in essence, ten years ago--tax rates that had been lowered for everyone ten years ago.  You do know--if the tax rates remain the same for years to come, the federal government is still overspending in relation to what revenues it takes in--the federal government should have been basing its spending pattern over the last two years on what it was taking in.  So, what Barack Obama is proposing is increasing taxes for people who make--in "gross"--$250,000 a year or more.  Yet, Barack Obama hinted that, if those who make more than $250,000 a year were to have their tax rates left the same, the federal government would have to "borrow" seven-hundred-billion dollars.  What nonsense thought is that?  There is much more in the messy statement that I could talk about, but I have decide to skip it.  Understand the one topic that I have brought up.]
    "...Well, the truth is that the way this thing works out it's folks who are millionaires and billionaires who get the biggest breaks, and it turns out that actually the people who are most likely to us that money and spend that money, ah, are actually people of more modest means, ah, and it what we're concerned about is--How we can grow the economy?--ah, there are more efficient ways ta recirculate dollars out there and get people to spend...."  [Ask yourself--"What are the 'more efficient ways ta recirculate dollars out there and get people to spend'?"]

    Sunday, November 7, 2010 (at St. Xavier's College in Mumbai, India):
    "...Well, you know, eh, eh.  The phrase Jihad has a lot of meanings within Islam, um, and is subject to a lot different interpretations.  But I will say that, first, Islam is one of the world's great religions, and, ah, more than a billion people who practice Islam--the overwhelming majority--ah, view their obligations to their religion as ones that reaffirm peace and justice and fairness and tolerance.  Ah, I think all of us recognize that this great religion in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted to justify violence toward innocent people that is never justified.  Ah, and so I think one of the challenges that we face is--How do we, ah, isolate those who have these distorted notions, ah, of religious war and reaffirm those who see faiths of all sorts whether you are a Hindu or a Muslim or a Christian or a Jew or, ah, any other religion or you, eh, don't practice a religion that we can all treat each other with respect and mutual dignity, and that some of the universal principles that Gandhi referred to, ah, that those are what we're living up to, ah, as we, ah, live in a nation, eh, or nations that have very diverse religious beliefs?  Ah, and, and that's a major challenge's a major challenge here in India, but it's a challenge obviously around the world.  And young people like yourselves can make a huge impact, ah, in, in, in reaffirming that you can be a, a strong observer of your faith, ah, without putting somebody else down or visiting violence on somebody else...."      [Basically, the question posed to him--posed to him by a young woman--that resulted in this answer was: What is your take or opinion on Jihad?  I transcribed the text from a video, and it took it about two-minutes and twenty-nine seconds for Barack Obama to say what I have presented.  (Read it allowed, and see how long it takes you to read it.)  In Barack Obama's answer, Barack Obama never did tie Jihadists to extremists, and Barack Obama never did really talk about Jihadists.  Barack Obama skirted the question.  I say in jest, "Yes, Barack Obama did not want to get those Jihadists angry with him for talking about them as the killers that they are."]
    "...For most of my lifetime--I'm, I'll turn fifty next year--ah, for most of my lifetime, the United States was such a dominant economy power, we were such a large market--you know, our industry, our technology, our manufacturing was so significant that we always met, eh, the rest of the world economically on our terms.  Now, because of the incredible rise of India and China and Brazil and other countries--you know, the United States remains the largest economy and, and the largest market--but there's real competition out there, and that's, eh, potentially healthy.  It makes--you know, Michelle was saying earlier, 'I like tough questions 'cause it keeps me on my toes.'--well, this will keep America on its toes...."  [Okay!  I hope you were alert for this mess from Barack Obama.  Ask yourself--What did Barack Obama mean by the idea of meeting 'the rest of the world on our terms'?  It sounds to me that Barack Obama thought that the United States was--you know (as he might say)--a bully in relation to economic matters with other countries in the past, which Barack Obama, today, does not like.]

    Tuesday, November 9, 2010 (at a press conference in Jakarta, Indonesia):
    "...But this kind of activity is never helpful when it comes to peace negotiations.  And I'm concerned that we're not seeing each side make the extra effort involved to get a breakthrough that could finally create a framework for a secure Israel living side by side in peach with a sovereign Palestine...."  [This answer came as a response to a question about plans that had been announced
on Monday, November 8, 2010, by Israel to proceed with the building of new housing in East Jerusalem, a place that Palestinians--especially terrorist types--want to become the homeland for Palestinians, even though history shows that Jews have had ties to the land for thousands of years (there were times when the land was taken way by wars, and, by the way, Israel regained the land in the Six Days War of 1967, which was a war between (1) Israel and (2) Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.  Through the quotation, you can see, in essence, Barack Obama is not backing Jews but is backing Arabs.  By the way, it would be on Wednesday, November 10, 2010, that the Barack Obama administration announced--announced through Secretary of State Hillary Clinton--that the United States of America was giving an extra $150 million to the Palestinian National Authority (or Palestinian Authority), which was having a budget shortfall.  Yes, the United States of America was, in essence, broke and in deep debt, but the Barack Obama administration announced it would give an extra $150 million to the Palestinian National Authority--which had been set up in 1994 by the "Oslo Accords" related the Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (a terrorist group) to govern parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip--to keep the Palestinian National Authority financially solvent (the federal budget for 2010 for the United States of America already had set up $600 million for the Palestinian Authority).]

    Tuesday, November 9, 2010 (at the University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia):
    "...Indonesia is a part of me...." [This is the English version of his statement made in Indonesian (the language).]

    Friday, November 12, 2010 (in Seoul, South Korea, after the G20 meetings):
    "...Ah, the United States obviously, ah, has a special role to play on the international stage, ah, regardless of who is president.  Ah, we are a very large, very wealthy, very powerful country.  Ah, ah, we have had outsized influence over world affairs for a century now.  And you are now seeing a situation in which a whole host of other countries are doing very well and coming into their own, and naturally they're going to be more assertive in terms of their interests and ideas. And that's a healthy thing...."  [Notice the "outsized" idea, which makes me think Obama dislikes the fact that the U.S. has had a big influence in the world, which has included, for example, helping to end World War I and World War II and displacing Saddam Hussein, and it seems to me Barack Obama is happy, for example, China is becoming more powerful (while he is hurting the U.S.)   I think, in essence, Barack Obama is happy a communist country is getting a chance to lead the way.]
    "...Eh, eh, that is the wrong interpretation, because I haven't had a conversation with, ah, with Republican and Democratic leaders.  Here's the right interpretation.  I want to make sure that taxes don't go up for middle-class families starting on January 1.  That's my number-one priority for those families and for our economy.  I also believe that it would be fiscally irresponsible for us to permanently extend the high-income tax cuts.  I think that would be a mistake, particularly when we've got, ah, our Republican, ah, friends saying that they're number-one priority is makin' sure that we deal with our debt and our deficit...."  [What Barack Obama is pushing for is increased taxes for the those he considers "rich," such as those who make "$250,001" in gross profits or more in a year.  If I have to use the word set known as "middle class," I guess I can ask--Do you know persons who can be considered "middle class" can make more than $250,000 in gross profits in a year?  Gross profits is a figure that does not include the costs of supplies, employees, rent, et cetera.  By the way, the question that would lead to the quoted material was about David Axelrod's recent statement that the Barack Obama administration had a compromise position to extend the Bush tax cuts (which had been put in place about ten years ago).]

    Thursday, November 18, 2010 (a speech about General Motors):
    "...American workers are back at the assembly line manufacturing the high-quality, fuel-efficient American-made cars of tomorrow, capable of going toe to toe with any other manufacturer in the world...."  [It was on this day that General Motors made a stock offering--an Initial Public Offering (or IPO).  For decades, General Motors has been going toe to toe with all other manufacturers.  Notice Barack Obama said that "American workers are back," hinting that American workers were gone or something, when they were not.]
    "...Just two years ago, this seemed impossible.  In fact, there were plenty of doubters and naysayers who said it couldn't be done, who were prepared to throw in the towel and read the American auto industry last rites...."  [So, in essence, on the day of filing for bankruptcy in 2009 (the filing of which was effective June 8, 2009), General Motors was owned by stockholders, bondholders, and secured creditors, and after the company existed bankruptcy (on July 10, 2009), the owners were the U.S. Treasury, the Canada Development Investment Corporation, the Government of Ontario, old GM bondholders, the United Auto Workers (a union), and the Canadian Auto Workers (a union), and, really, the U.S. government had about 61 percent of the company, and the UAW (retiree health-care trust) had 17.5 percent of the company, and the Canadian government had 11.7 percent, and the bondholders of the old company had 9.8 percent.  The IPO reduced the U.S. government stake in the company down to about 36 percent.  The Shanghai Automotive Industry Group--of China--bought about $500 million of the new stock, which is about one-percent of the stock available, and since SAIC is owned by the China--the government or the country--a part of GM is owned by China now.  So a lot of GM is still owned by leftists or leftist entities.]
    "...Independent estimates suggested, however, had, ah, had we taken that step, had we given up, we would have lot more one-million jobs across all fifty states.  It would have also resulted in economic chaos...."  [This is unsubstantiated nonsense.  It was very likely, if General Motors would have gone through the regular bankruptcy process--and not the Barack Obama controlled bankruptcy process--the company would have still been operating through the bankruptcy process (as happens with many companies that go through bankruptcy) and would still be operating today, and some jobs would probably have been lost, but there would not have economic chaos.  And companies would still be producing cars in the U.S.]

    Friday, November 26, 2010 (on a special with Barbara Walters on ABC-TV):
    "...And so no matter how much good stuff we've done, people still are lookin' at 9.6 percent unemployment, ah, and that's frustrating for people.  Ah, I don't make any excuses...."  [So, ABC-TV aired A Thanksgiving Visit with President and Mrs. Obama: A Barbara Walters Special on this day at 10:00 p.m. Eastern time; it had not been listed in television-program-listings publications that I saw, such as the famous TV Guide.  The program seemed to be a somewhat last-minute production, the purpose of which was to show Barack Obama in a good light--at home, in a way, with the wife, Michelle, and Barbara Walters interviewed both Barack Obama and Michelle Obama.  It was fluff, but Barack Obama and Michelle did show some things that you should know about.  I say, in relation to the quoted material for this paragraph, that Barack Obama has not done any "good stuff."]
    "...The economy is now stabilized.  Our focus has to be on issues like education, issues like investing in research and development, issues like infrastructure development...."  [It is not the job of the federal government to "invest" on "research and development."  Companies do "research and development," and it is all types of companies and they try to make all types of things.  What "research and development" was Barack Obama thinking about?  Also, the economy is not "stabilized."  The housing market is a mess.  For instance, new home sales dropped eight-point-one percent in October 2010, and it was the fourth drop in the last six months, and the medium price of a home dropped to become the lowest level since October 2003, and I recently learned a house right next door to where I had lived from about 1977 to 2006 in Dearborn, Michigan, sold for about fifty percent less than what the house that I had lived in when it was sold about four years ago--and the two houses are structured exactly the same (having been built by the same man) ("Sold in your area." Detroit Free Press, 21 November 2010, p. 5G.; Crutsinger, Martin.  "New home sales drop 8% during October."  Detroit Free Press, 25 November 2010, p. 5B.).]
    "...Well, we've actually taken a whole series of steps to reform the education system that are unprecedented, ah, and have gotten compliments from Republicans, including people like Newt Gingrich, so, ah, that's one area where we can make a difference right away.  We're gonna have to do something about the deficit and the debt, um, and the problem is that historically--at least lately--there's been a lot of rhetoric on all sides that pretends that somehow we can have somethin' for nothin', ah, that we can, you know, fund all our important programs and maintain our safety net, make sure Social Security and Medicare are safe, have a Defense Department that gets everything it wants, and we don't en, end up having to pay for it, and that's gonna be an area where I think, ah, we got to have an honest conversation...."   [There is so much to say about this piece of crap o statement, but I will only look at a few points.  First, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 cuts the budget of Medicare by $500,000,000,000 (or five-hundred-billion dollars), and yet Barack Obama is concerned about making "Medicare" safe.   So, Barack Obama talked crap about Medicare.  "We're gonna have to do something about the deficit and the debt"--Barack Obama was a big contributor to increasing the deficit and debt, more than any past President in history, and now it looks as if he is going to raise more taxes to pay for his overspending and defective ideas about government spending.  That is more crap.  I have yet to learn what the "series of steps to reform the education system" have been that are good--Barack Obama was instrumental in taking over--"nationalizing"--the student-loan program of the country this year, which is bad and is crap.]
    "...I am confident that, if we're investing in our infrastructure, if we are investing in research and development that continues to make us an innovation leader for the future, ah, that we are gonna do great.  I'm very, ah, very confident that our best days are still ahead of us...."  [Ugh!]
    "...I'm going to be meeting with the Republican leadership, ah, next week, and I'm looking forward to hearing what their ideas are.  We need to get this resolved, ah, and, ah, I, you know, expect that I don't end up getting everything I want.  I think hopefully they come to the table understanding they're not gonna get everything they want...."  [History shows that Barack Obama has not listened to anything that the Republican have said in the past roughly two years.]
    [Note: During the program, Michelle Obama made this statement: "You know I think that it's important for him to finish what he's started.  I mean a thing that doesn't get talked about and that is that any ambivalence that I felt was all personal.  It was all the sacrifice that this life requires of one family.  But, um, if I had ta pick the man that I'd want to be in politics, the kind of person that we seek out in this country, somebody who's honest and sincere and smart as a whip, um, and he would be the person that I would pick...."  This entire document is filled with proof that Barack Obama is a perpetual liar, and such is the way of "enslavers" or "enslavists," such as communists, and Barack Obama is one of them.  Here, I show that Michelle Obama is also a liar, since she made the push through the statement presented here that Barack Obama is "honest," and I have shown otherwise through this document.  You are urged to see my document entitled Conservatives and The United States Constitution Versus Enslavers and Enslavism (Communism, Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can be reached by using this link: Enslavism.]

    Tuesday, November 30, 2010 (statements made after a meeting with Republicans):
    "...I appointed my Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, and my Budget Director, Jack Lew, to work with representatives of both parties to break through this log jam.  I've asked the leaders to appoint members to help in this negotiation process.  They agreed to do that.  Ah, that process is beginning right away, and we expect, ah, to get some answers back over the next couple of days about how we can accomplish, ah, our key goal, which is to make sure the economy continues to grow, and we are putting people back to work.  Ah, and we also want to make sure that we're giving the Middle Class the peace of mind of knowing that their taxes will not be raised come January 1....."  (On Tuesday, November 30, 2010, Barack Obama had a special meeting with ranking Republicans of the U.S. Congress, and one purpose--presented to the public--was they were trying to come up with an answer to the "Bush tax cuts" (circa 2001 and 2003) ending at the end of the year.  Around this time, Democrats were saying that the Republicans were for giving the "rich" tax breaks.  But, really, Republicans were working to keep the tax levels equal for all levels, while the Democrats were working to raise taxes on people--though maybe not for all people--by letting the "Bush tax cuts" run out, which would cause tax rates to rise.  Notice Barack Obama was so concerned about the "Middle Class."  What is the "Middle Class" to Barack Obama?  Do you really think Barack Obama--a perpetual liar--is concerned about the "peace of mind" of others?]
    "...There are real philosophical differences, and although the atmosphere in the, today's meeting was extremely civil, ah, there's no doubt that those differences are gonna to remain, no matter how many meetings we have.  Ah, and the truth is there's always gonna be a political incentive against working together, ah, particularly in the current hyper-partisian climate.  There are always those who argue that the best strategy is simply to try to defeat your opposition instead of working with them,   And, and, frankly, even the notion of bipartisinship itself has gotten caught up in this mentality, but I think there was recognition today that's a game that we can't afford...."  [I hope for no bipartisanship for the next two years, and I hope for Republicans to block and stall on everything Barack Obama wishes to do, since Barack is a liar and is an evil man--though he smiles so nicely for people--and Barack Obama has a truly defective mind.]

    Thursday, December 2, 2010 (a Blair House in Washington, D.C.):
    "...I'm actually optimistic that, ah, before the end of the year, ah, we are gonna have, come to some disagreements on some critical issues.  Obviously, issue number one is making sure that on January 1, Middle Class families, ah, aren't seeing their taxes go up as a consequence of the expiration of some of the Bush tax cuts that are currently in place and some of the tax cuts that we put in place over the last two years.  Ah, and so that's gonna be an important discussion, ah, over the next several days.  In the end, people are gonna recognize that...."  (Hold it!  Forget that nonsense.  In essence, while Barack Obama was putting out this nonsense--or at least on the same day--the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, which had already been passed by the U.S. Senate, and the U.S. House of Representatives sent the finished bill on to Barack Obama to be signed, and the law now gives the federal government even more power to control every food that is sold at public schools.  Welcome to "enslavism--the world of Barack and Michelle Obama!  You are urged to see my document entitled Conservatives and The United States Constitution Versus Enslavers and Enslavism (Communism, Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can be reached by using this link: Enslavism.]

    Monday, December 6, 2010 (at Forsyth Tech Community College, Winston Salem, North Carolina):
    "...Republicans want to make permanent the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.  I have argued that we can't afford it right now, but, but what I've also said we got to find consensus here, because a Middle Class tax hike would be very tough not only on working families, it would also be a drag on our economy at this moment.  So I believe we should keep in place tax cuts for workers and small businesses that are set to expire.... " [The main topic of the entire speech--not only this quoted material--was related to the debate of extending the existing tax rates or not, which had been set up in 2001 and 2003.  Let me talk about the word "worker."  Anybody who has a job could be called a "worker," because a person who might be called a "worker" does "work."  A person who owns a business and has employees is a person who works, often, for example, in the case of small businesses, working many hours a day, such as ten or twelve hours--dealing with employees and overseeing bookkeeping and more (while employees do their jobs for set hours, such as eight hours, and go home).  Marxists, such as Barack Obama, always use "worker," and they keep the definition confined to people who can be better called "employees," working to keep, for example, employees and employers in different categories and hinting to the naive and ignorant that employers do not work.  "Worker" is a word that has a lower stature than "employee" does, and Barack Obama thinks of many people as simply "workers," like worker bees, faceless and expendable.]
    "...We are the home of the world's best universities, the best research facilities, the most brilliant scientists, the brightest minds, some of the hard-working most entrepreneurial people on earth--right here in America.  It's in our DNA.  Think about it.  People came from all over the world to live here in the United States.  That's been our history.  And those were the go-getters, the risk-takers who came here.  The folks who didn't want to take risks, they stayed back home...."  [I am unclear about why Barack Obama would bring this up, given the main topic was related to extending the current tax rates, but I shall bring up one thought.  Not all the risk-takers or go-getters in this country came from other countries, and, in fact, most go-getters or risk-takers were born here.  I argue the idea that risk-takers and go-getters exist all over the world, and people come to this country to get away from countries in which they cannot be risk-takers or go-getters.  Americans are not the only people with what might be referred to as risk-taker DNA or go-getter DNA, but people in other countries are burdened by the governments under which they live or the rulers under which they must live.  Risk-taking and go-getting can be suppressed, as is done in communist countries.]
    "...So fifty-years later, our generation's Sputnik moment is back.  This is our moment.  If the recession has taught us anything, it's that we cannot go back to an economy that driven by too much spending, too much borrowing, runnin' up credit cards, takin' out a lot of home equity loans, paper profits that are built on financial speculation.  We got ta rebuild on a new and stronger foundation for economic growth.  We need to do what America has always been known for--builiding, innovating, educating, making things.  We don't want to be a nation that simply buys and consumes products from other countries.  We want to create and sell products all over the world that are stamped with three simple words--'Made in America'...."  ["Sputnik"--this was a satellite launched into orbit by the Soviet Union on October 4, 1957, and it was never an American moment.  In addition, Barack Obama made an error in the "Sputnik" statement in another way--you cannot say that "our generation's Sputnik moment is back",  you should say that "our generation's Sputnik moment is here."  The remainder of what Barack Obama said was simply filler.]

    Monday, December 6, 2010 (during a speech about an agreement in the U.S. Congress between Republican Party leaders and Democratic Party about taxes):
    "...Now, there's no doubt that the differences between the parties are real and they are profound.  Ever since I started running for this office, I've said that we should only extend the tax cuts for the Middle Class.  These are the Americans who've taken the biggest hit, not only from this recession but from nearly a decade of costs that have gone up while their pay checks have not.  It would be a grave injustice to let taxes increase for these Americans right now, and it would deal a serious blow to our economic recovery.  Now, the Republicans have a different view.  Ah, they believe that we should also make permanent the tax cuts for the wealthiest two percent of Americans.  I completely disagree with this!  A permanent extension of these tax cuts would cost us seven-hundred-billion dollars at a time when we need to start focusing on bringing down our deficit.  And economists from all across the political spectrum agree that giving tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires does very little to actually grow our economy.  This is where the debate has stood for the last couple of weeks.  And what is abundantly clear to everyone in this town is that Republicans will block a permanent tax cut for the Middle Class, unless they also get a permanent tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, regardless of the cost or impact in the deficit...."   [I hope you had fun reading this nonsense from Barack "The Liar" Obama.  Tax cuts do not cause deficits; overspending causes deficits, and anyway, the debate is not about tax cuts but about keeping the tax rates the same.  Barack Obama has the distinction of being the biggest spender in world history, and yet now Barack Obama is going 'to start focusing on bringing down our deficit.'  When Barack Obama came into office, the country had the current tax rates, and, generally speaking, Barack Obama was aware how much revenue the federal government had, and yet Barack Obama spent more than what the government had.  By the way, what economists and how many economists did Barack Obama have in mind?]
    "...At the same time, I'm not about to add seven-hundred-billion dollars to our deficit by allowing a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans...."  [There is that nonsense idea again!]
    "...Because if Republicans truly believe we shouldn't raise taxes on anyone while our economy is still recovering from the recession, then surely we shouldn't cut taxes for wealthy people while letting them rise on parents and students and small businesses...."  [Barack Obama slipped in this defective idea in his speech.  At no time, was anyone saying that the so-called wealthy should not get tax cuts and parents, students, and small businesses should get tax cuts.  Barack Obama was being deceptive.]
    "...For the next two years, every American family will keep their tax cuts--not just the Bush tax cuts, but those that have been put in place over the last couple of years that are helping parents and students and other folks manage their bills.  In exchange for a temporary extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, we will be able to protect key tax cuts for working families--the Earned Income Tax Credit that helps families climb out of poverty, the Child Tax Credit that makes sure families don't see their taxes, ah, jump up, ah, a thousand dollars for every child, and the American Opportunity Tax Credit that ensures over eight-million students and their families don't suddenly see the cost of college shooting up...."    [I could cover many things here, but I will only cover one.  Barack Obama put forth the idea that people can thank Barack Obama for protecting them against the Republicans, who would like to do damage to the Earned Income Credit, the Child Tax Credit, and the American Opportunity Tax Credit and keep people in poverty.  However, for example, the Earned Income Tax Credit does not help "families climb out of poverty"--not really--since if the Earned Income Tax Credit were to be adjusted (and it probably would not have been in this case), it would be adjusted so minimally that the people who are involved with the Earned Income Tax Credit provision would stay about the same.]
    "...Under this agreement, unemployment insurance will also be extended for another thirteen months, which will be welcome relief for two-million Americans, who are facing the prospect of having this life line yanked away from them right in the middle of the holiday season...."  [So instead of enacting policies that would allow the economy to improve and allow businesses to create more jobs, Barack Obama is helping to keep the unemployment-benefits period long and helping to make sure people can be lax about finding work or complainingeven more about lack of jobs.]
    "...This agreement would also mean a two-percent employee payroll tax cut for workers next year, a tax cut that economists across the political spectrum agree is one of the most powerful things we can do to create jobs and boost economic growth...."  [I am baffled--How does cutting employee payroll tax by two percent become "one of the most power powerful things we can do to create jobs and boost economic growth"?  That is nonsense!]
    "...In exchange, the Republicans have asked for more generous treatment of the estate tax than I think is wise or warranted, but we have insisted that that will be temporary...."  [Yes, for now Barack Obama cannot claim assets and wealth from families when a person of that family dies.  Barack Obama did nothing to help families gain assets and wealth, such as old dishes or antique furniture, which in some way has already been taxed over the years.  It is good Barack Obama has been blocked at least a little!]
    "...In fact, there are things in here that I don't like, namely the extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and the wealthiest estates.  But these tax cuts will expire in two years, and I'm confident that as we make tough choices about bringing our deficit down, as I engage in a conversation with the American people about the hard choices we're gonna have to make to sec, secure our future and our children's future and our grandchildren's future, it will become apparent that we cannot afford to extend those tax cuts any longer...."  [The "enslaver" is disappointed.  I say, "Good!"  Barack Obama deserves more disappointments, especially since it is very likely Barack Obama is going to work to spend more and more and more.]

    Tuesday, December 7, 2010 (at a Presidential News Conference):
    "...Now, I know there are some who would have preferred a protracted political fight, even if it had meant higher taxes for all Americans, even it it had meant an end to unemployment insurance for those who are desperately looking for work.  And I understand a desire for a fight.  I'm sympathetic to that.  I'm as opposed to the high-end tax cuts today as I've been for years.  In the long run, we simply can't afford them.  And when they expire in two years, I will fight to end them, just as I suspect the Republican Party may fight to end the Middle Class tax cuts that I've championed and that they've opposed.  So we're gonna keep on having this debate.  We're gonna keep on having this battle.  But in the meantime, I'm not here to play games with the American people or the health of our economy...."  [For about an hour, this press conference went on.  This quoted material comes for the statement portion of the program, which was followed by a question-and-answer session, much of which was boring and filled with nonsense.  In this quoted material, there is nonsense, such as "we can't afford them."  The big point that you must be aware of as nonsense is--"...I suspect the Republican Party may fight to end the Middle Class tax cuts...."   The Republican Party has not championed getting rid of Middle Class tax cuts in the recent past or the past; for example, around 2001-2003, it was the Republican Party that was instrumental in getting tax cuts for all Americans.   Here, through the quoted material, Barack Obama lied and passed on misinformation.  By the way, notice how Barack Obama passed along the idea--to his left-wing people--that he will continue to fight for socialism and wealth redistribution.]
    "...Or alternatively what I can do is I can say, ah, that I am going to stick to my position that those folks get relief, that people get help for unemployment insurance, and I will continue fight before the American to make the point that the Republican position is wrong!  Now, ah, eh, if there was not collateral damage, if this was just a matter of my politics or being able to persuade the American people to my side, then I would just stick to my guns, because the fact of the matter is the American people already agree with me.  I mean there are polls showing right now that the American people for the most part think it's a bad idea to provide tax cuts to the wealth.  But the issue is not me persuading the American people--they're already there.  The issue is how do I persuade the Republicans in the Senate who are currently blocking that position.  I have not been able to budge them...."  [Okay, did you see problems in this set of quoted words?  Ask yourself--What polls show that the American people "already agree with" him (Barack Obama)?  Remember: The fight has had nothing to do with cutting taxes!  The issue has been to keep the current tax rates the same or raise the tax rates--to help cover his overspending.  Barack Obama purposely confused the issue.  Did the polls to which Barack Obama hinted ask people if they want to increase taxes?  Remember: The plan was to increase taxes on, for example, small businsses that have $250,000 plus in gross income, and people who operate such businesses are in what might be called the Middle Class.  Barack Obama lied again.]
    "...Well, ah, let me say this.  On the Republican Party side, this is their holy grail--these tax cuts for the wealthy.  This is, ah, seems their central economic doctrine, and so unless we had sixty votes in the Senate at any given time, it would be very hard or us to move this forward.  I have said that I would have like to have seen a vote   Before the election, I thought this was a strong position for us to take into the election ta crystalize, ah, the position of the two parties, because I think the Democrats have better ideas.  I think, ah, our proposal to make sure that the Middle Class is held harmless but that we don't make these Bush tax cuts permanent for wealthy individuals 'cause it was gonna cost, ah, the country at time when we've got these, ah, looming deficits, that that was the better position to take, and the American people were persuaded by that, but the fact of the matter is I haven't persuade he Republican Party...."  [Eh!  What evidence does Barack Obama have to show the "American people were persuaded by that"?  Notice "looming deficits" were mentioned.  "Looming deficits" is nonsense.  We already have the big deficits, and they are going up everyday because of Barack Obama and Barack Obama's policies.  Oh, in essence, the Democrats of today are hardline communists and socialists and such, and many have shown that they wish to do harm to the country.]
    "...So what this package does is provide an additional boost that is substantially more significant than I think most economic forecasters, ah, had expected.  And, in fact, you have already seen some just, ah, over the last twenty-four hours suggest that, ah, we may see faster growth and more job growth as a consequence of this package.  I think the payroll tax holiday will have in impact.  Unemployment insurance probably has the biggest impact in terms of making sure that, ah, the, ah, recovery that we have continues and perhaps at a faster pace.  Overall, every economist I've talked to suggest that this will help economic growth and this will help, ah, ah, job growth over the next several months...."
    "...I've, I've said before that I felt the Middle Class tax cuts were being held hostage to the high-end tax cuts.  Ah, I think it's tempting not to negotiate with hostage takers, ah, unless the hostage gets harmed, then, ah, people will, ah, question the wisdom of that strategy.  In this case, the hostage was the American people, and I was not willing to see them get harmed...."  [Barack Obama likened Republicans to "hostage takers."  I know no U.S. President of the past who has put the "hostage-taker" label on any Republicans or Democrats in a press conference.  I say in jest, "Is not Barack Obama so wonderfully presidential?":]
    "...Now, I could have enjoyed the battle with Republicans over the next month or two, ah, because as I said--the American people are on our side.  This, this is not a situation in which I have failed to persuade the American people of the rightness of our position.  I know the polls.  The polls are on our side on this.  We weren't operating from a position of political weakness with respect to public opinion...."  [Here is more crap from Barack Obama.  The election was held on November 2, 2010, and Republicans made a lot wins, but no big change comes to the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate till January 2010, and that means Democrats still control the U.S. Congress.  Yet, Barack Obama could not get some Democrats to go along with him this time  There was weakness in that Barack Obama had a weakened position, having lost some Democrats to push his position through the U.S. Congress.]
    "...I will be happy to see the Republicans test, ah, whether or not, ah, I'm itchin' for a fight on a whole range of issues.  Ah, I suspect they will find I am, ah, and I think the American people will be on my side on a whole bunch of these fights...."  [To date, I have not been on Barack Obama's side on any issues, since I am not a stupid American, and I will probably not be on Barack Obama's side in the future.]
    "...Here, here, here's my expectation, ah, and I'll take John Boehner at his word, that nobody--Democrat or Republican--ah, is willing to see the full faith and credit of the United States government, ah, collapse, but that wouldn't not be a good thing to happen, ah, and so I think that there will be, you know, significant discussions about the debt-limit vote.  That's something that nobody likes to vote on.  Ah, but, you know, once, ah, John Boehner's sworn in as, ah, Speaker then he's gonna have responsibilities to govern.  Ah, you, you can't just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower...."  [Terrorists have "bombs."  So John Boehner is a terrorist?  Barack Obama has started his demonizing of John Boehner in the eyes of Americans.]
    "...With respect ta the bottom line in terms of what my core principles are.  Yeah!  Well, ah, look, I have a whole bunch of lines in the sand.  Not, not, not, ah, not makin' tax, ah, cuts for the wealthy permanent, that was a line in the sand.  Making sure that the things that most impact Middle Class families and low-income families, that those were preserved, that was a line in the sand.  I would not have agreed to a deal, which, by the way, some in Congress were talking about, of just a two-year extension on the Bush tax cuts and one year of unemployment insurance but meanwhile all the other provisions of Earned Income Tax Credit or, ah, you know, other important breaks for Middle Class families, like the college-tax credit, that those have gone away, just because they had Obama's name detached to 'em instead of Bush's names attached to them.  Ah, eh, you know, so this, so this notion that somehow, um, you know, we are willing to compromise too much, ah, reminds me of the debate that we had during health care.  Th, this is the public-option debate all over again.  So I pass a signature piece of legislation, where we finally get health care for all Americans, something that Democrats had been fighting for for a hundred years, but because there was a provision in there that they didn't get that would have affected maybe a couple of million people, even though we got health insurance for thirty-million people and the potential for lower premiums for a hundred-million people, that somehow that was a sign of weakness and compromise.  Now, if, if that is the standard by which we are measuring, ah, success or core principles, then let's face it--we will never get anything done.  People will have the satisfaction of having a purist position and no victories for the America people, and we will be able to feel good about yourself and sanctimonious about how pure our intentions are and how tough we are, and in the meantime, the American people are still saying to themselves, not able to get health insurance because of preexisting condition or not being able to pay their bills 'cause their unemployment insurance ran out.  That can't be the measure of, of how we think about our public service!  That can't be the measure of what it means to be a Democrat!  This is a big diverse country.  Not everybody agrees with us.  I know that shocks people!  You know, The New York Times editorial page does not permeate across all of America, neither does The Wall Street Journal editorial page.  Most Americans, they're just tryin' ta figure out how, how ta go about  their lives, and, and, and how can we make sure that our elected officials are lookin' out for us?  And that means because it's a big diverse country and people have a lot of complicated, ah positions, it means that, in order to get stuff done, we're gonna compromise.  This is why F.D.R., when he started Social Security, it only affected widows and orphans.  You did not qualify!  Eh, eh, and yet now it is something that really helps a lot of people.  When Medicare was started, it was a small program--it grew.  Under, under the criteria that you just set out, each of those were betrayals of some abstract ideal.  This country was founded on compromise.  I couldn't go through the front door at this country's founding!  And, you know, if we were really thinking about ideal positions, we wouldn't have a Union.  So, my job is to make sure that, ah, we have a North Star out there--What is helping the American people live out there lives?  You know--What is giving them more opportunity?  What is growing the economy?  What is making us more competitive?  And any given juncture, there are gonna be times where, ah, my preferred option, what I am absolutely positive is right, I can't get done.  And so then my question is--Does it make sense for me to tackle a little bit this way or tackle a little bit that way?-- because I'm keeping my eye on the long term and the long fight, not the my day-to-day news cycle, but where am I gonna over the long term.  And I don't think there's a single Democrat out there, who they look at where we started when I came into office and look at where we are now, would say that we have not moved in the direction that I promised...."  [This set of words is from the final section in Barack Obama's answer to a question asked by a reporter for The Wall Street Journal, and while Barack Obama was answering, it was evident that Barack Obama was perturbed and even angry, and he passed along more lies and gave what sounded a bit like a lecture, certainly aimed at Democrats--Marxists and such.  There will not be health care for all Americans--it is publicly know now that there will be rationing.  Since Social Security was started, it has become mismanaged and, basically, bankrupt.  Medicare did grow, and it grew to the point where it is trillions in debt.  Barack Obama noted that there is a potential for premiums for health-care to go down, but it has already become public knowledge the premiums are going up and will do up, and even though a person has "health-care insurance," it does not mean the person will get actual "care."  Barack Obama noted that "he couldn't go through the front door at this country's founding," and he really lied big time on that, and evidence exists on the twenty-dollar bills, which show men involved making the document for the Continental Congress in the 1700s, one of whom was a man with dark skin (John Hanson). (I say that Barack Obama has hate on for "whites" and, in essence, the hate goes back to the founding of the country!)  Besides telling lies, Barack Obama used the time to try to persuade the "left"--espeically the hardline "left"--that he is still working to put Marxist policies in place--he is still devoted to the cause.  By the way, a Marxist, like Barack Obama, is not really working for the good of "the American people" or working to provide victories for "the American people," since that is not the nature of a Marxist (and you are urged to see my document entitled Conservatives and The United States Constitution Versus Enslavers and Enslavism (Communism, Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can be reached by using this link: Enslavism.)]

    Thursday, December 9, 2010:
    "...Every economist that I've talked to or that I've read over the last couple of days acknowledges that this agreement would boost economic growth in the coming years and have the potential to create millions of jobs...."  [Okay, here, Barack Obama talked about "millions of jobs," but notice what Barack Obama would say the next day, shown to you in the first paragraph of the next entry "Friday, December 10, 2010").]

    Friday, December 10, 2010 (an interview on NPR on Morning Edition):
    "... Nobody--Democrat or Republican--wants to see people's paychecks smaller on January 1, because Congress didn't act.   They're also gonna understand that the single most-important thing we can do for all of our constituencies is to make sure that the recovery that is taking place right now gets stronger.  In the last forty-eight hours, a range of independent economists--both left and right--have concluded that this package would in fact increase potential economic growth by as much as one percent and could end up meaning, ah, an additional million-and-a-half jobs, and that I think has got to be the highest priority...." [See the entry for "Thursday, December 9, 2010" of this document]
    "...There are going to be discussions between both House and Senate leadership about all the final elements of the package.  Keep in mind we didn't actually write a bill!  Ah, we put forward a framework.  I'm confident that the framework is going to look like the one that we put forward...."  [Keep this one in mind for reference, since it seems to hint that Barack Obama proposed the main idea of the tax bill that is being worked on, and it seems to hint Barack Obama wanted the original idea of the bill, but I cannot say for sure, since everything tied to him is often vague r a lie.]
    "...It doesn't!  Which is why I was opposed to it.  And I'm still opposed to it!  I've said repeatedly that I think they're not a smart thing to do, particularly because we got to borrow money essentially to pay for 'em.  The problem is that this is the single issue that the Republicans are willing scotch the entire deal for.  Either I allow the recovery that we're on to be endangered or we make a compromise now--understanding for the next two years this is going to be a central battle as part of a larger discussion about do we reform our tax code so that it's fair and how do we make sure that we actually are dealing with the deficit and debt in an intelligent way...."  [This answer was related to the query about whether or not keeping the same tax rates for the rich creates one single job.  Of course, I say that keeping the same tax rates--if that is all that is involved--does not kill a job.  Of course, raising taxes on the so-called rich--whom, to Barack Obama today, are those persons or businesses that gross at least $250,000 in a year--can kill jobs in the private sector.]

    Monday, December 13, 2010 (during the signing of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act):
    "...they played a huge role in makin' this happen--Senator Harry Reid, ah, the Majority Leader in the Senate, Senator, ah, Mike McConnell, the ranking Republican, who helped facilitate the smooth passage of this bill...."  [I say as a put down to a stupid man, "Hey, genius, it's 'Mitch McConnell'!"]

    Monday, December 13, 2010 (on WFLA-TV, Tampa, Florida):
    "...This tax package does a couple of things immediately for, ah, economic growth in Florida.  Number one, ah, for those folks who are looking for work right now, it extends their unemployment benefits.  Two-million people across the country would lose their unemployment benefits at the end of this month if we did not, ah, move forward on this tax agreement, and economics say that not only is that good for those families, it's good for the entire economy.  It's probably the biggest boost that we can give an economy, because those folks are most likely to spend the money...."  [Ugh!  The focus was on an unemployment/tax-rate bill was being considered in the U.S. Congress, and it was be scheduled to lead to at least two-hundred-billion dollars in more spending--really, this bill was an attempt by Democrats to spend many billions more this year (the bill had spending provisions in it that had nothing to do with unemployment or taxes).  By the way, tomorrow would be the day that an Omnibus Bill, which would be made up of about 2,000 pages, would be put forth in the U.S. Senate--it would be another massive spending bill (one-point-one-trillion dollars or 1,100-billion dollars) and it would be a bill that had no input from Republicans.]
    "...That's the nature of these things.  You know, when Social Security was passed, there were all kinds of lawsuits.  When the Civil Rights Act was passed and the Voting Rights Law was passed, there were all kinds of lawsuits...."  [This statement was made in reference to the judgment that had been set down recently by Judge Henry Hudson, a federal judge in Virginia, against a portion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and more on this issue can be learned by reading my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, particularly "Special Note #59," which can be reached by using this link: Health.]
    "...We are absolutely confident that the basic, eh, ah, issue that this judge identified, which is that, ah, we say, in order to make that sure insurance companies have to provide care to people with pre-existing conditions, we got to make sure that everybody has some kind of insurance, the same way they have car insurance, but that's some, ah, but that's something that make sense to most people.  Ah...think about it, ah, when it comes to car insurance, we wouldn't say that, ah, you can wait until you get into a car wreck and then you can go to the insurance company say, 'Yeah, I wanna buy some insurance for my car.'  Well, if that's, if you can't do that for car insurance, why can you do it for health insurance?  How can you wait until you get sick and then go and say, 'I want to buy some insurance.'?  Um, that isn't fair...."  [One reason people have to have car insurance is to pay for damages that a person--as a driver--might do to another person or another person's property.  If you do not drive, you do not have to have car insurance.  Medicare and Medicaid are health-care systems run by the government, and they do not provide to people all the operations or all the medicines that the people might deem as things they need--some people are denied stuff--and that happens with the Veterans medical program, too.  Insurance is a contract situation in which a person pays money (a premium or premiums) to an entity that will do what is required by the contract if some prescribed event or thing happens, such as pay for hospital bills if the person who has paid the premium or premiums gets ill and is cared for in a hospital.  In essence, Barack Obama's health-care act (really the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010) will make it possible when it becomes active for a person to not buy health-care insurance and pay a penalty to the government--a nominal fee--for not having health-care insurance and, if the person gets sick, to go to an insurance company and buy insurance--which the insurance company must provide because of government law.  In life, in relation to a given person, no other person or entity can provide preparations for all problems that the person will experience--obviously, some problems are beyond what another person can take care of for anyone, and, anyway, the other person also has problems--and, no other person or entity should be forced--by government--to make up for all the troubles that person can have in life, some of which are caused by nature--nature bigger than any man by far.  Remember: No man created nature, being a part of nature, and no man created what pre-existing conditions that another many might have.  A health-insurance insurance company can only cover some problems--it unable to cover all (to cover all would go beyond the ways of nature and reality).  Sometimes, all the money in the world cannot fix something.  There is a limit on how much an insurance company can pay out in year and stay in business, since if the insurance company takes in a given amount in premiums in a year and must pay out more than that given amount as coverage, the company will die and disappear.  Insurance companies have deductibles and co-pays set up in contracts since medical care can be expensive, and insurance companies cannot cover all costs, and that means a person has to cover some things for the self when the problems are small.  Generally speaking, insurance exists as something to cover big events and big problems.  Car insurance involves much less money than health-care insurance does, and often if people have small accidents with vehicles, they do not even file claims, deciding to pay for damages out of pocket.  Car insurance is only used, if it is used, when something happens, but health-care insurance can be used regularly, such as for regular checkups every year.  That is it--I quit!   I could talk much more about the differences between car insurance and health-care insurance, but I stop now and note--Barack Obama's trying to equate car insurance with health-care insurance is nonsense, or Barack Obama's trying to say that car insurance and health-care insurance are the same is nonsense.]

    Wednesday, December 15, 2010 (statements before the press):
    "...I am absolutely convinced that this tax-cut plan--although not perfect--will help grow our economy and create jobs in the private sector, and it will help lift up Middle Class families who will no longer need to worry about a New Year's Eve tax hike.  It will offer emergency relief to help tide folks over until they find another job.  And it includes tax cuts to make college more affordable, help parents provide for their children, and help businesses large and small expand and hire...."  [I can say, "There is much that I could say about this, but I will only cover one topic."  Barack Obama had a particular bill in mind as the main topic, and the bill that was a bill in the U.S. Congress that was designed to keep tax rates the same, to deal with unemployment-benefits extension, and spend billions more on all sorts of things (and the bill was a different bill than a 1.1-trillion-dollar "omnibus" bill that was being worked on, too).  The bill was not a bill that will "help businesses large and small expand and hire."  The reason that I can say the previous sentence is actual tax cuts for businesses was not being proposed, so things were going to stay the same for businesses in relation to tax rates!  Ask yourself--How is the bill going to spur business expansion--if everything is going to stay the same and the bill has the government spending about a couple hundred-billion dollars more, which increases the federal government debt?]
    "...And for me the most important questions about an economic idea is not whether it's good short-term politics or meets somebody's litmus test, it's whether it will help spur businesses, jobs, and growth.  That's why I've set a goal of doubling U.S. exports in the next five years to create more jobs selling more products abroad...."  [Notice Barack Obama seems to be worried about U.S.-based businesses' ability to make and sell products overseas and not to make and sell products in this country.  The United States is a big market, and businesses should make and sell products--all types of products--to people in this country first, since it means products do not have to be made in other countries and shipped here.  Increasing the number of jobs related to making products for other countries will not do much to spur the growth of the economy of this country--not really.  And just because Barack Obama has a five-year goal and talks about it does not mean that the goal will be met or really be reached for.]
    "...This morning I hope to elicit ideas from these business leaders that will help us not only climb out of recession but cease the promise of this moment--ideas about tax reform, ideas about a balanced approach to regulation that will promote rather than undermine growth, ideas that will help encourage businesses to invest in America and American jobs at a time when they're holding nearly two-trillion dollars on their books...."  [Ask yourself--Why did Barack Obama bring up the idea of "two-trilliion dollars on their books"?  What does "two-trillion dollars on their books" mean?  It seems to me Barack Obama was trying to give the impression that businesses have a lot of money that they sitting on and are not spending purposely.  It seems to me Barack Obama was trying to tell idiot Americans and such that businesses are purposely working to not invest in America and American jobs and you should hate them.  If a business has money saved up, the business will only invest it if it looks as if the investment idea will probably not fail, and at the moment, businesses are holding on to some money so that they will not lose it in the economic environment that has been set up and is being set up by the policies of Barack Obama and the Democrats in the U.S. Congress.  In addition, businesses always have savings in case bad times come in the near future, and businesses always have savings so that they do not always have to borrow money to do things (when a business borrows money, it has to pay a fee for borrowing the money, and that is not good). Also, where did Barack Obama--the perpetual liar--get the figure of "two-trillion dollars" for his presentation?]
    "...We know some of what we need to do to out compete other countries in the twenty-first century--we need to offer our children the best education in the world, we need to spur innovation and new industries, like clean energy that will create the jobs of tomorrow, we need to update America's crumbling infrastructure, its roads and bridges, update high-speed rail and high-speed Internet to connect every community, and we need to redouble our commitment to physical discipline and address our long-term deficit challenges...."  [Here you have more flap doodle from Barack Obama, and it was like other statements that you can find elsewhere in this document.]

    Thursday, December 16, 2010 (at Tribal Nations Conference (2010) in Washington, D.C.):
    "...We've heard time and again from tribal leaders that one of the keys to unlocking economic growth on reservations is investments in roads and high-speed rail and, and, and, ah, ah, high-speed Internet and the infrastructure that will better connect your communities to the broader economy.  That's essential for drawing capital and creating jobs on tribal lands...."  [What a bunch of crap this statement is.  For example, how will high-speed rail help tribal nations have better economies?  It will not!  What tribal nations need is a government structure that supports the individual and capitalism.   Tribal ways, like those in Africa, are for ant societies and the past.]
    "...And we're working with you to increase the size of tribal homelands in order to help you develop your economies.  I also want to note that I support legislation to make clear, in the wake of a recent Supreme Court decision, that the Secretary of Interior can take land into trust for all federally recognized tribes...."  [Think hard about this statement.  Barack Obama has people around him who support the "La Raza" idea, and you are urged to see my document entitled "La Raza": Yet Another Enemy in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this La Raza link, and, basically, the idea involves work to break apart the United States of America so that much of the western region of the country can be given to people who want to join the region with Mexico.  Ask yourself--What does Barack Obama's statement really mean?]
    "...We're also breaking down bureaucratic barriers that have presented tribal nations from developing clean energy, like wind and solar power...."  [I wonder how many tribal leaders bought this piece of crap of a statement.  Wind power and solar power will not make tribal nations economic forces; wind power and solar power will make the tribal nations just get buy.  I urge you to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached through this Carbon link, and my document entitled The Power and the Power Killers: Energy in the United States of America, which can be reached through this Power link.  Let me use a cliché here, though it may not fit--I wonder if the tribal leaders and other Native Americans have figured out that Barack Obama speaks with a "forked tongue."  I bet many do not understand the nature of the man--Barack Obama.]

    Friday, December 17, 2010 (signing the Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2010):
    "...Tax rates for every American were poised to automatically increase on January First.  If that had come to pass, the average Middle Class family would have had to pay an extra $3,000 in taxes next year.  That wouldn't have been just a blow just to them, it would have been a blow to our economy, just as we're climbing out of a devastating recession...."  [Okay, Barack Obama passed along this.  Now look at the next piece.]
    "...In fact, not only will Middle Class Americans avoid a tax increase, tens of millions of Americans will start the new year off right by opening their first paycheck to see that it's actually larger than the one they get right now...."  [Okay, what can you make of this?  Now, think about the $3,000 figure of the previous paragraph.  If you divide $3,000 by 26 weeks (which comes from the idea of getting 26 paychecks in a year), you have $115.  No, $115 should not be in your mind as the amount that the "first paycheck" will see as an increase for the "tens of millions of Americans" to whom Barack Obama referred, since that was a figure related the idea of income-tax increase, which is not happening.  I have no idea how much of an increase Barack Obama was referring to, but it surely must be less than $115, since the Social Security tax (for only one year) is being moved from roughly six percent to four percent.  Remember: The new law keeps income tax rates the same.  Yes, the new bill lowers the Social Security tax, so people will see a slight increase in their paychecks.  But since Barack Obama mentioned $3,000, as I show in the previous paragraph, you might infer an average $3,000 increase over a year is coming to people.  That is wrong!  Barack Obama ran hype!  If a person makes $40,000 in a year and the person gets to keep an extra two percent for one year, then the person gets to keep $800 extra, which is equal to twenty-six weeks of about $31 dollars.  Of course, other problems come up now--if a person has more take home pay, there is more money that might have to be paid in, for example, state income tax, if the person lives in a state that has an income tax, and city income tax, if the person lives in a city with an income tax, so, in truth, that $31 dollars really will not be $31 dollars (it will be less).  If a person makes $20,000 in a year, the person's paycheck gain is about $15.50 or less every two weeks (which is about $7.75 or less every week).  Of course, there is a problem with the Social Security tax going down--people put less into Social Security--and that comes a a time when Social Security is taking in less in revenue than it pays out, which means Social Security is bankrupt.  Of course, the theory with Social Security is--the less you put into it (for your future), the less you will get in the future.  So, in theory, the reduction in the Social Security tax will hurt you when you get older.  Again, Barack Obama by signing a law--in this case, the Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2010--hurt what he might call "the little people," and the number of persons is in the millions.  Barack Obama created more crap for the future!]

    Wednesday, December 22, 2010 (signing the Don't Ask Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010):
    "...For a long time, your service has demanded a particular kind of sacrifice.  You've been asked to carry the added burden of secrecy and isolation, and all the while, you've put your lives on the line for the freedoms of citizenship that are not fully granted to you...." [I disagree with Barack Obama's statement about "the freedoms of citizenship" and those freedoms not being fully granted.]
    "...No longer will tens of thousands of Americans in uniform be asked to live a lie...."  [Eh!]

    Friday, January 7, 2011 (at Thompson Creek Manufacturing, Landover, Maryland):
    "...That promise is at the heart of who we are as a people, and it's at the heart of our economic might.  It's what helps give an entrepreneur the courage to start a business or a company the confidence to expand.  It's what leads to new products and new ideas and technologies that have not only have made us the world's largest economy but also the most innovative economy in the world.  Making it possible for businesses to succeed is how we ensure that our economy succeeds and all our people succeed--it's how we create jobs.  And that's what's guided my administration for the past two years.  Government can't guarantee Thompson Creek or any business will be successful.  But government can knock down barriers, like a lack of affordable credit or high costs for investment or high cost for hiring--we can do something about that.  Government can remove obstacles in your path...."  [This set of words from Barack Obama is loaded with crap, and the biggest piece of crap is: "...But government can knock down barriers, like a lack of affordable credit or high costs for investment or high cost for hiring--we can do something about that."   For example, what is Barack Obama's nonsense about reducing the "high costs of investment"?  How can the federal government reduce the cost of investment?  And what did Barack Obama mean anyway?  If you invest your money in something, you invest what you decide to invest.  If a company is investing money to develop a product, the company uses what money that it takes to get the thing created, and the amount of work and time can be more than originally predicted.  Also, I say in jest, "Did Barack Obama's idea about reducing the high cost of investment mean he wants companies to spend less on investments?"  Barack Obama did dummy talk!  Think about how the government can reduce the high cost of hiring.  What does it mean to reduce the high costs for investment?  Businesses hire people when they have a need for more employees or more people to help provide a product or a service--requested by customers.]
   "...And that's why we cut taxes for small businesses over the last two years.  For example, with a tax break for hiring unemployed workers, Thompson Creek was able to grow its workforce from two-hundred employees to nearly three-hundred employees in just one year, and it took advantage of the tax credits that we put into place.  We also passed a tax credit for products like energy-saving windows, and that led to a fifty-five-percent boost in the sales at this firm...."  [One reason Thompson Creek did better is the federal government corrupted the consumer market by, in essence, giving people money to buy new windows, as part of the federal government's work to--supposedly--make some homes more air tight and use less energy.  So when is the federal government going to give the popcorn-selling stores help by giving tax breaks to people who buy aready-popped popcorn?  So when is the federal government going to give people who like to buy Playboy magazine tax breaks so that they can more easily buy Playboy magazines?  So when is the federal government going to give bald actors tax breaks on hairpieces so that those bald actors can buy more hairpieces?  So when is the federal government going to give tax breaks to people who like to buy Victoria's Secrets garments so that Victoria's Secrets can sell more of those--you know--ah, lacy things?  So when is the federal government going to help those guys and gals who operate those machines containing stuffed animals and stuffed toys that people can get by operating a job stick and a hanging claw-like thing so that maybe the price will go down from twenty-five cents a play to twenty cents a play and so that there will be more economy activity and there will be more of those machines in the grocery stores, maybe with long lines of customers?  Et cetera!]
    "...So incentives like these are helping companies across America, and the jobs numbers released this morning reflect that growth.  The economy added more than a hundred-thousand jobs last month, and the unemployment rate fell sharply.  And we know these numbers can bounce around from month to month.  But the trend is clear.  We saw twelve straight months of private sector job growth.  That's the first time that's been true since 2006...."  [Well, yes, a little over 100,000 jobs were added in December 2010, information that was reported on this day by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (of the federal government), but what the country needs to be doing is creating more than 400,000 every month.  By the way, around January 5, 2011, a company known as Automatic Data Processing was predicting that about 300,000 had been created in December 2010, and, on January 5, 2010, some news entities reported that jobs-increase prediction, which probably made people think things are better than they really are.  On January 7, 2010, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the regular unemployment rate was 9.4 percent for December 2010 and the "U6" unemployment rate (or what I call the "full unemployment rate") was 16.7 percent.  From January 2000 through August 2008, the regular unemployment rate was in a range of from 4.0 percent to 6.1 percent, and from September 2008 through April 2009, the regular unemployment rate was in a range of from 6.2 percent to 8.9 percent, and from May 2009 through December 2010, the regular unemployment rate for every month was more than 9.0 percent and sometimes reached 9.7 percent--meaning there were 20 months where the unemployment rate was more than 9.0.  In addition, from May 2009 through December 2010, the U6 unemployment rate had a range of from 16.4 percent to 17.3 percent.  One reason the unemployment rate went down in December 2010 from that of November 2010 (which was 9.7 percent) was some more people stopped looking for work (Rugaber, Christopher S.  "103K new jobs in Dec. point to slow, steady growth."  Jacksonville.com (The Florida-Times Union), 7 January 2010, 10:24 a.m.).]
    "...We also see more optimistic economic forecasts for the year ahead, in part due to the package of tax cuts I signed last month, including a payroll tax cut for workers and a series of tax cuts to encourage investment and innovation and hiring.  And I fought for that package because, even though our economy is recovering, we've still got a lot to do...."  [This statement is a big lie, since, in late 2010, the Democrats in the U.S. Congress--whom Barack Obama was in league with, of course--were pushing to increase taxes on small businesses by raising the income tax rates on small businesses that had "gross" income of more than about $250,000 in a year.]

    Wednesday, January 12, 2011 (a speech in Tucson, Arizona):
    "...Thank you very much.  Thank you.  Please, please be seated...."  [On Saturday, January 8, 2011, a man named Jared Loughner shot and killed and shot and injured a number of persons in Tucson, Arizona, and Wednesday, January 12, 2011, Barack Obama spoke at a special service for the killed and injured.  The quoted material is a part of Barack Obama's opening sequence of his speech.  While Barack Obama said these words, the crowd was loud--yelling and applauding.]
    "...Right after we went to visit, a few minutes after we left her room and some of her colleagues from Congress were in the room, Gabby opened her eyes for the first time.  Gabby opener her eyes for the first time!  Gabby opened her eyes.  Gabby opened her eyes...."  [I have no comments to make about this set of words, since I put them here as only a reminder for me.]

    Wednesday, January 19, 2011 (a press conference with the president of China):
    "...I absolutely believe that, ah, China's peaceful rise is good for the world and is good for America...."  [Yes, Barack Obama implied that the rise of a peaceful China--or peaceful communism--is good for the world and good for America.  Such nonsense Barack Obama said.  Communism--it is not peaceful.  Communism is oppressive and hurtful to individuals!  By the way, I urge you to see the entry called "88. A "State Dinner for a dictator" in my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which shows that Lang Lang (a pianist) played an anti-U.S. song or pro-communist-soldier song at the "State Dinner" for President Hu Jintao of China on this date and which can be reached by using this link: History.]

    Thursday, January 20, 2011 (at a GE plant in Schenectady, New York):
    "...It's a great thing that the economy is growing, but it's not growing fast enough yet to make up for the damage that was done by the recession.  The past two years were about pulling our economy back from the brink, and next two years--our job now is putting our economy into overdrive, our job is to do everything we can to ensure businesses can take root and folks can find good jobs and America's leading the global competition that will determine our success in the twenty-first century...."  [This passage I shall say is the serious piece of the two pieces that I present in this section--the next piece is a comedy piece.  For now, I will say that Barack Obama announced that he had made Jeffrey Immelt (the CEO of GE) the head of a new entity--the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.  Such nonsense that is, especially when you read the next part of this section.]
    "...We're gonna back to Thomas Edison's principles.  We're gonna build stuff and invent stuff.  Now, nobody understands this better than Jeff Immelt.  He understands what it takes for America to complete in the global economy...."   [So, what is funny, you ask?  In the 1800s, a number of men--working independently--helped advance the creation of the useful incandescent light bulb, some of whom were Jean Eugene Robert-Houdin, Joseph Swan, James Bowman Lindsay, and Thomas Edison, the last of whom came up with a truly worthwhile light bulb and would create electric companies.  On December 19, 2007, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 became law, and one thing spelled out in the law is that light bulbs had to be more energy efficient, which resulted in a phase out for the selling of incandescent light bulbs in the country--100-watt bulbs would become passé in January 2012 and 40-watt bulbs would become passé in January 2014.  In addition, in 2007, California passé legislation that was aimed at ending the selling of incandescent light bulbs in California, and on January 1, 2011, 100-watt incandescent light bulbs made before January 1, 2011, could not be sold in California.  Basically, the killing of the incandescent light bulb in the United States of America can be pinned on socialists and environmentalists, who have pushed the idea that those incandescent light bulbs are helping to kill the plant.  Well, while governments are banning incandescent light bulbs--under pressure from communists, nuts, and such--Barack Obama is praising Thomas Edison, and Barack Obama is going to inspire inventors and inventions--or he thinks he has the power to inspire inventors and inventions.  It took some 70 years to create a useful light bulb, and government did not push the development, and, really, governments can determine what the next innovation will be.  And then we get to Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of GE.  In 2009, GE, which is mostly known for making electric equipment and electricity creation, was able receive government bailout money because it owned two small banks in Utah. Do you find any of this funny?  By the way, CFLs are some of the replacements for incandescent light bulbs, and CFLs have mercury in them , and that is bad, and some people are bothered adversely by CFLs or florescent lights, getting headaches when near ones that are on.  Maybe, you will find this funny.  One purpose of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness (or the CJC) is to advise Barack Obama and other politicians on getting people back to work. Yes, the CJC, which was created by a Marxist (Barack Obama), is going to tell Barack Obama--who dislikes private-sector entities--how to create jobs and get Americans back to work.  You may now laugh, if you wish!]

    Tuesday, January 25, 2011 (another "State of the Union" speech):
    "...We need to take responsibility for our deficit and reform our government...."  [On this day, the seating arrangement in House was not as usual, where Republicans sit in one area and Democrats sit in another area.  This time, it was like a get-together event where the Republicans and the Democrats were scattered about, set up to sort of show at time of unity, and it was sort of related to the shooting incident of January 8, 2011, when U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords (a Democrat related to Arizona) and several others were shot and injured and several other persons were shot and killed.  I have determined that the set up, pushed along by Democrats, was done so that Republicans would be less inspired to show dislike for Barack Obama in the House, being surrounded by Democrats, and the audience--the television audience--would see less disapproval from Republicans than what might otherwise come or detect less disapproval by Republicans to what Barack Obama said than what might otherwise be possible (and that could make Barack Obama look better).  The statement presented in the quotation marks of this part of this section is not something that can be analyzed for much--on the face.  The statement is something that has to be remembered for future use, since, to date, Barack Obama has spent more money than any past U.S. President in U.S. history and has increased the debt more in the same amount of time--two years--than any past U.S. President.  In addition, it must be remembered that Barack Obama created a "debt commission" in 2010, which was supposed to advise him on how to cut the deficit, and the whole idea or ploy, which ended with a report near the end of 2010, went nowhere--it  was simply a show.  Ask yourself--Who are the "we" in Barack Obama's "We need to take responsibility for our deficit"?]
    "...Now, by itself, this simple recognition won't usher in a new era of cooperation.  What comes of this moment is up to us.  What comes of this moment will be determined not by whether we can sit together tonight but whether we can work together tomorrow.  I believe we can, and I believe we must.   That's what the people who've sent us here expect of us.  With their votes, they've determined that governing will now be a shared responsibility between parties.  New laws will only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans.  We will move forward together or not at all, for the challenges we face are bigger than party and bigger than politics...."  [Between January 20, 2009, and January 2011, in the U.S. Congress, the Democrats did not work with the Republicans, and that fact is well documented--the Democrats, for example, even locked the Republicans out of discussions, such as by changing locks on doors, and the Democrats pushed socialistic rules and laws through the U.S. Congress.  The national election of November 2010 was not an election in which voters showed that they wanted the guys and gals in the U.S. Congress to work together; the national election was a time when a large number of citizens voted to put people in the U.S. Congress  who would fight against and block what the Democrats (now, basically, communists and socialists today) do, having been fooled in the past by what the Democrats of today are.  To save the country of becoming, in essence, a dictatorship in which a few will determine the lives of the others through rules and laws, the Republicans must not get involved in a "new era of cooperation."  "Coooperation" benefits Barack Obama and not the good people of the United States of America.]
    "...And we are poised for progress.  Two years after the worst recession most of us have ever known, the stock market has come roaring back, corporate profits are up, the economy is growing again.  But we have never measured progress by these yardsticks alone...."  [This statement, which is a lie or deceptive, is a hard one to disprove to the naive, because it would involve a discussion "QE2" and the idea that few jobs are being created in the private sector, so I simply note it so that in the future it can be looked at again for what really happens between this date and January 2013.  I can say that there will be short-terms gains, but I can say that Barack Obama is going to propose tax increases around the time of the elections of the fall of 2012, and if those tax increases are put in place, they will help stall the economy, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has tax increases in it, such as on medical equipment.  Today, many people are having trouble paying their monthly mortgage-loan payments.  The federal government is hiring more and more people every day, and the government's putting more people in government jobs does not improve the economy.  A lot of problems, caused by the govenment, still exist!]
    "...A half a century ago when the Soviets beat us into space with the launch of a satellite called Sputnik, we had no idea how we would beat them to the moon.  The science wasn't even there yet.  NASA didn't exist.  But after investing in better research and education, we didn't just surpass the Soviets, we unleashed a wave of innovation that created new industries and millions of new jobs.  This is our generation's Sputnik moment..."  [Barack Obama has sort of changed the mission of NASA, and now NASA is supposed to be more "social."  The goal of NASA used to be to explore space.  In 2010, Americans learned of a statement made by the Administrator of NASA, Charles Bolden, and it was said to Al Jazeera (the Arab news organization): "...When I became the NASA Administrator -- or before I became the NASA Administrator -- he [Barack Obama] charged me with three things.  One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science...." (Powers, Doug.  "The Left Stuff: NASA's Muslim Outreach."  Michelle Malkin, 6 July 2010, 0:03 a.m.).  Really, it should be said that it is is our generation's "sputtering" moment.  You are urged to see the section called "61. A speech to a lot of NASA workers ? at the Kennedy Space Center" of my document called A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this link: History.]
    "...Two years ago, I said that we needed to reach a level of research and development we haven't seen since the space race, and in a few weeks, I will be sending a budget to Congress that helps us meet that goal.  We'll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean-energy technology...."  [Yes, Barack Obama worked to get people take up the cause of spending more money on new projects.]
    "...We need to get behind this innovation, and to help pay for it, I'm asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies.  I don't if, ah, I don't know if you've noticed,  but they're doing just fine on their own.  So instead of subsidizing yesterday's energy, let's invest in tomorrow's.  Now clean-energy breakthroughs will only translate into clean-energy jobs if businesses know there will a market for what they're selling.  So tonight I challenge you to join me in setting a new goal--by 2035, eighty-percent of America's electricity will come from clean-energy sources.  Some folks want wind and solar.  Others want nuclear, clean coal, and natural gas.  To meet this goal, we will need them all...."  [Oh, boy, what nonsense!  The Barack Obama administration has put in place restrictions on drilling for oil in many waters associated with the United States of America, and one thing that that has done is kill jobs in the oil industry and kill revenues for companies that get revenues from people who work in the oil industry, such as at waitress in restaurants.  On January 13, 2011, the Barack Obama administration--specifically the Environmental Protection Agency--pulled an existing coal mining permit for a mine in Logan County, West Virginia.  It can take decades to put nuclear power plants on line, because of all the government-imposed steps related to regulation that exist; the last nuclear power plant to come on line in the country came on line in 1996, which is fifteen years ago.  The year 2035 is about twenty-four years away.  If there is going to be enough electricity available in 2035 and if eighty percent of all that electricity is going be tied to "clean-energy" generation, the Barack Obama administration has to issue construction permits for dozens and dozens of nuclear plants today, if not yesterday.  I show in my document entitled The Power and the Power Killers: Energy in the United States of America that solar power and wind power are defective means for providing the majority of the electricity required to sustain a country and allow a country to improve or grow, and to reach the document, you can use this link: Power.  If what the Barack Obama administration has done in relation to energy over the last two years is any indication, Barack Obama's statement is flap doodle, and it was also a time when Barack Obama attacked oil companies, the way of Marxists.  It is well understood that people like Barack Obama like to have the government control and own the oil companies of a country or nationalize oil companies so that they have more control over the citizens--how and when and where citizens can travel.  It seems Barack Obama covered the topic of tax breaks or subsidies to the oil industry.  The farm industry is one industry has gets government subsidies, and it is not the only other industry.  If Barack Obama was talking about shutting down subsidies to oil companies, Barack Obama should have been talking about stopping all subsidies used in the country, especially those in which the federal government gives big tax breaks or, in essence, pays people some money if they buy electric cars.]
    "...Already, we're seeing the promise of renewable energy.  Robert and Gary Allen are brothers who run a small Michigan roofing company.  After September 11 [2001], they volunteered their best roofers to help repair the Pentagon, but half of their factory went unused, and the recession hit them hard.  Today, with the help of a government loan, that empty space is being used to manufacture so, solar shingles that are being sold all across country.  In Robert's words, 'We reinvented ourselves.'..."  [What Gary and Robert Allen did was get into a type of business the promoted by government, not the way of true entrepreneurism, or what Gary and Robert did was become pawns in the government's push to manipulate the energy system of the country.  What Barack Obama did here was promote the idea that, if you take up what I am pushing, you can get a loan.]
    "...When a child walks into a class room, it should be a place of high expectations and high performance, but too many schools don't meet this test.  That's why instead of just pouring money into a system that's not working, we launched a competition called "Race to the Top."  To all fifty states, we said--If you show us the most innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement, we'll show you the money.  "Race to the Top" is the most-meanfuling reform of our public schools in a generation...."  ["Race to the Top"--it is another one of those federal programs--social programs--that looks good on paper to socialists and such.  In the quotation, I hear--"If you do what we say--what Barack Obama says--we will give you money or if you teach what we want taught, you will get money!"  It is the federal government giving dictates in exchange for money.]
    "...Of course, the education race doesn't end with a high-school diploma.  To compete, higher education must be within the reach of every American.  That's why, that's why we've ended the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that went to banks and used the savings to make college affordable for millions of students...."  [Here, Barack Obama attacked banks, which had been involved in lending money for students loans, and what Barack Obama did not say is that, while the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (March 2010) was passed, the federal government nationalized the student-loan industry in the country, and it can now lead to the federal government's deciding who gets student loans and who do not and deciding what careers students will be able to enter in relation
    "...One last point about education.  Today, there are hundreds of thousands of students excelling in our schools who are not American citizens.  Some are children of undocumented workers, who had nothing to do with the actions of their parents.  They grew up as Americans and pledged allegiance to our flag, and yet they live everyday with the threat of deportation...."  [This is a load of crap.  Barack Obama used the term "undocumented workers."  Really, "undocumented workers" are "illegal aliens" or citizens of foreign countries and law breakers, and people who are not citizens of this country deserve nothing.  Sometimes, the sins of parents pass on to their children, and that is the way of life.  Let me be clear--The children of illegal aliens did not grow up as Americans, since the children--being born to citizens of other countries--are citizens of other countries!  In addition, children, such as the children of illegal aliens, do not pledge allegiance to our flag at schools as happened in schools in the 1960s, the 1950s, the 1940s, and farther back in time.  The children of illegal aliens have made to clear pledge of allegiance to the United States of America!]
    "...Now I strongly believe that we should take on once and for all the issue of illegal immigration, and I am prepared to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, enforce our  laws, and address the millions of undocumented workers who are now living in the shadows...."  [I cover only two points here.  Notice Barack Obama talked about "undocumented workers."  "Undocumented workers" are illegal aliens, and "undocumented workers" are people who are breaking the laws of the United States of America, and "undocumented workers" are citizens of other countries.  Also, Barack Obama has balked at truly defending our border with Mexico, and one example is Barack Obama has not in earnest sent troops to southern Arizona to push back drug smugglers who, in essence, have control of some U.S. land, such as part of a national park (and Barack Obama has taken Arizona to court to block Arizona's work to combat the problem of illegal aliens).]
    "...To attract new businesses to our shores, we need the fastest most reliable ways to move people, goods, and information--from high-speed rail to high-speed Internet.  Our infracture used to be the best.  But our lead has slipped.  South Korean homes now have greater Internet access than we do.  Countries in Europe and Russia invest more in the roads and railways than we do.  China is building faster trains and newer airports.  Meanwhile, when our own engineers rated our infrastructure, they gave us a 'D.'...."   [First, new businesses can be created without having high-speed rail.  Lack of high-speed rail is not stopping people from creating new businesses.  Second, Barack Obama seems to think new business will only be created in the U.S. by people of other countries.  Third, there is high-speed Internet systems in the country, and because every citizen in the country does not have high-speed Internet is not something that blocks the creation of new businesses.  Fourth, I ask--Who were the engineers who rated our infracture and what were the criteria.  Fifth, Barack Obama compared the road infrastructure of the U.S. with that of what other country.  By the way, Michigan has roads all over the place, and you can get everywhere, and if you leave the big cities in China and go to the rural areas, and you will find a lot of bad roads or dirt roads.]
    "...Within twenty-five years, our goal is to give eighty-percent Americans access to high-speed rail.  This could allow you to go places in half the time it takes to travel by car.  For some trips, it will be faster than flying, without the pat down...."   [Barack Obama had a good time making a joke here, but Barack Obama passed along nonsense.  First, Amtrak has been a losing deal for decades, and it is not because it is not a high-speed rail system.  The country is big, bigger than any country in Europe is, and, to make it clear, I report that the topic is land mass.  You cannot make enough high-speed or low-speed rail systems in the country to make it possible for people to get around the country conveniently--there are too many places scattered all over the place, and the places cannot be tied together through rail systems.  When the country was younger, such as in the 1800s, and when there are a few main population centers, trail systems for passengers had value and were useful, allowing people to travel across the country.  Then more and more cities sprang up all over the place, and, today, people go in too many directions and at all different times.  The United States of America is not  Europe.  Let me show you what Detroit is doing.  In the early 1900s, for example, Detroit had a mass transit system along Woodward Avenue, and people sort of lived along and close to Woodward Avenue and used the transit system to get to jobs the downtown area.  Detroit has been losing population since the 1950s, going from about 1.5 million to about 900,000, and there is no reason to say that the population will grow more in the next few decades (creating a rail system does not grow a city--when people come to a city to live, they grow the city, and then rail system may be needed).  Detroiters want a mass transit system set up along Woodward Avenue between downtown Detroit and Eight Mile Road, but people are no longer concentrated along Woodward Avenue, and many people live in suburbs of Detroit, and, today, when people who want to get to downtown Detroit, mostly to see sports events or entertainment shows, they use all types of directions and routes, and if such a rail system would exist, the people would not find the Woodward Rail system convenient or helpful or useful.  In addition, a mass transit system set up in a dead city--Detroit--that offers no reason for people to move to it, is a bad idea and would be a waste of money.  Barack Obama's plan for high-speed rail systems all over the country would also be a waste of money, being inconvenient.  What Barack Obama is doing is trying to create a need for something that is not needed, and it can be said that Barack Obama is pushing for the construction of a luxury item, which will have to be subsidized forever, as Amtrak is, and that is bad for the country, and I can say that Barack Obama is pushing a romantic dream.  Incidentally, Barack Obama used "eighty percent" in this set of quoted words, and it was the second time that he used "eighty percent."  Why is "eighty percent" special for Barack Obama?]
    "...For example, over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries.  Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all, but all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world.  It makes no sense, and it has to change.  So, tonight, I'm asking Democrats and Republicans to simplify the system--get rid of the loopholes, level the playing field, and use the savings to lower the corporate tax rate for the first time in twenty-five years without adding to our deficit...."  [The federal government sets the tax code.  How do lobbyists "rig" the tax code?  And what is his nonsense about "use the savings..."?  I cannot figure what Barack Obama was talking about because he spoke nonsense.]
    "...To reduce barriers to growth and investment, I've ordered a review of government regulations.  When we find rules that put an unnecessary burden on businesses, we will fix them...."  [Since January 2009, the budget for the Environmental Protection Agency (or the EPA), which makes rules and regulations, has had a budget increase of 125 percent, and to me, the only reason for the increase in the budget is so that the EPA can make and enforce more rules and regulations.  Oh, here is some information about useless regulations from the EPA, which, I believe, is purposing working to hurt the country.  In 2010, people, especially farmers, were hearing how the EPA was working on rules to force farmers to spend money to, for example, install extra milk storage tanks on their properties and to set up emergency spill plans related to milk, and the EPA was doing that under the guise that milk has animal fat or oil in it, and if milk is spilled, it could hurt the environment, and, for example, The Holland Sentinel (in Michigan) was one newspaper that reported on the EPA idea in 2010 (Daining, Peter.  "Outcry from farmers over spilled milk rule."  The Holland Sentinel, 19 June 2010, 05:30 a.m.).  I say that the rules are evil and nonsense, and it is more evidence how bad the EPA under the control of the Barack Obama administration is.  By the way, on February 1, 2011, Thomas Sowell would make reference to the milk rule for a national audience by writing in his piece for WorldNetDaily entitled "Spilled milk?  EPA to the rescue!" (Sowell, Thomas.  "Spilled Milk?  EPA to the rescue!"  WorldNetDaily, 1 February 2011, 1:00 a.m. Eastern.).  I bet Barack Obama was lying about his plans of reviewing government regulations.   What do you think?]
    "...And that's why we passed reform that finally prevents the health-insurance industry from exploiting patients...."  [This statement is crap.  The health-insurance industry did not exploit patients.  Anyway, for years and decades, the country has had a count system to deal with problems in which an insurance company may or may not have violated an insurance contract.]
    "...Now I have heard rumors that a few of you still have concerns about our new health-care law.  So let me be the first to say that anything can be improved.  If you have ideas about how to improve this law by making care better or more affordable, I am eager to work with you.  We can start right now by correcting a flaw in the legislation that has placed an unnecessary bookkeeping burden on small businesses.  What I'm not willing to do, what I'm not willing to do is go back to the days when insurance companies could deny someone coverage because of a pre-existing condition...."  [While the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was being made, Barack Obama and the Democrats did not take suggestions from the Republicans.  Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is bad for many reasons, Barack Obama only hinted that the law might have some flaws, and Barack Obama hinted he might work to repair flaws it might have.  What Barack Obama is willing to do is correct some little flaws, as long as the main body of the law, which is bad, is left untouched--he is willing to compromise on little things to protect the big mess.]
    "...Now the final critical step in winning the future is to make sure we aren't buried under a mountain of debt.  We are living with a legacy of deficit spending that began almost a decade ago, and in the wake of the financial crisis, some of that was necessary to keep credit flowing, save jobs, and put money in people's pockets.  But now that the worst of the recession is over, we have to confront the fact that our government spends more than it takes in.  That is not sustainable.  Every day families sacrifice to live within their means.  They deserve a government that does the same.  So, tonight, I'm proposing that, starting this year, we freeze annual domestic spending for the next five years.  Now, this would reduce the deficit by more than four-hundred-billion dollars over the next decade and will bring discretionary spending to the lowest share of our economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president...."  [Ugh!]
    "...Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine.  It may make ya feel like you're flying high a first, but, dah, it won't take long before you feel the impact...."  [Ask yourself--What are "investments in innovation" and why would it be bad to cut them?  First, companies use their money to make investments in new businesses and new products and new services and try to use the money wisely, avoiding wasting money.  It is not up to the federal government to control where money for investing in new technology and things should go, but, yes, the government, such as through unversity grants for research, is at least somewhat involved in the innovation process, but the country will suvive if the we must reduce money that goes to universities for research.  I guess Barack Obama suggested, if the federal government cuts back on giving away money for research projects, some of which are truly nonense (as I have learned), the country will fall apart.  Then again, maybe, Barack Obama suggested that, if we stop giving tax breaks--or giving money--to those involved in making or buying solar panels and wind turbines, the country will be in a mess.  It is all nonsense!]
    "...The health-insurance law we passed last year will slow these rising costs, which is part of the reason that nonpartisan economists have said that repealing the health-care law would add a quarter of a trillion dollars to our deficit...."  [It is publicly known that the health-care law, which has not really taken effect and will not take affect till after the November 2012 elections, is going to add trillions to the deficit, but Barack Obama pushed the issue that repealing the law will add a quarter of a trillion dollars to the deficit.  Who is the source of that quarter-trillion-dollar figure and how was that figure arrived at?  I do not trust what was said.]
    "...And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply can't afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest two-percent of Americans.  Before we take money away from our schools or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax breaks.  It's not a matter of punishing their success, it's about promoting America's success...."  [Yes, the Marxist--Barack Obama--got that old line about taxing the rich into the discussion.  In Barack Obama's mind the government can afford to over-spend but the government cannot afford to let people keep the money that they made through work.   Ask yourself--How does keeping the tax rates the same result in the taxing away of money from, for example, schools.  And ask yourself--If the tax rate for a person remains the same and does not change, how does that cause money to be taken away from a school?  If the tax rate for a person remains the same, a school is not affected--the person is not taking money away from a school.  Barack Obama's thought makes no sense.  Remember: Barack Obama--a Marxist--is a person who likes the idea of punishing the so-called "rich," and Barack Obama, through the speech, tied to convince the audience that he is not trying to "punish their success," but his work to convince did not work and does not work because his logic fails.]
    "...If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it!  I will veto it...."  [I say in jest, "Yeah, right!"  I also ask--What is an "earmark" to Barack Obama?  His statement is a hollow statement.]
    "...Of course, some countries don't have this problem.  If a central government wants a railroad, they build a railroad, no matter how many homes get bulldozed.  If they don't want a bad story in the newspaper, it doesn't get written.  And yet as contentious and frustrating and messy as our democracy can sometimes be, I know there isn't a person here who would trade places with any  other nation on Earth.  We may have differences in policy, but we all believe in the rights enshrined in our constitution.  We may have different opinions, but we believe in the same promise--this is a place where you can make it if you try.  We may have different backgrounds, but we believe in the same dream that says--this is a country where anything is possible, no matter who you are, no matter where you come from...."  [When I heard this statement, I had several ideas come to mind.  What Barack Obama did was compare a dictatorship with the United States of America.  Why would any U.S. President do it, especially in the way the Barack Obama did.  To me, it was as if Barack Obama had to bring up the idea of how a dictatorship can work better, irritated he cannot do what is done in a dictatorship.  It was as if his subconscious was in control.  It was as if he were somewhat lamenting he could not act like a dictator and, for example, simply order the creation of a railroad   By the way, often democracy as done in the U.S. Congress is messy today since many people in it are socialists and communists--who are anti-The United States Constitution.  Barack Obama has shown through at least one public statement that he feels The United States Constitution is "flawed."  Here, Barack Obama noted that "we have differences in policy."  Think about that statement.  Republicans, generally speaking, are anti-dictatorship and anti-tyrany and pro-The United States Constitution, and if person is not like that, then what is the person?  (Note: Some Republicans are Republicans in name only and are really Democrats.)  Since Barack Obama dislikes the policies of the Republicans, then what he is?  If two persons disagree with each other, one will have to be right and one will have to be wrong.  The main theme of the Republican Party--"conservatism," which is the foundation and main principle of the country--is right and good for the individual, and if Barack Obama considers the Republican Party wrong, then what is Barack Obama?  Barack Obama's statement was a mess and was not believable and showed off some of his dislike with what his life is, confined by democracy.]
    "...And, tonight, more than two-centuries later, it's because of our people that our future is hopeful, our journey goes forward, and the state of our union is strong!"  [This line was, in essence, the closing line to the speech, if you do not count, for instance, the bye-bye stuff, and the statement does not ring true, given, for example, the full employment rate (the "U6") is around seventeen percent and gasoline prices seem to be heading for amounts around $4.00 a gallon or more than $4.00 a gallon in at least some parts of the country.]
    Note: I say that much of the speech was filler and platitudes and rah-rah stuff (without substance), and while listening to the speech, I remembered how, earlier in the day, I typed up information into A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction that noted how, on January 19, 2011, during the "State Dinner" for the President of China, Lang Lang (a pianist) played an anti-U.S. song from a Chinese movie of 1956 about the Korean War.

    Friday, January 28, 2011 (makes a statement about the troubles in Egypt):
    "...As the situation continues to unfold, our first concern is preventing injury or loss of life, so I want to be very clear in calling upon Egyptian authorities to refrain from any violence against peaceful protesters.  The people of Egypt, ah, have rights that are universal.  That includes the right to peaceful assembly and association, the right to free speech, and the ability to determine their own destiny.  These are human rights, and the United States will stand up for them everywhere.  I also call upon the Egyptian government to reverse the actions that they've taken to interfere with access to the Internet, to cell-phone service, and to social networks that do so much to connect people in the twenty-first century...."  [Over the last several days, there have been riots in Egypt, and a few persons have been killed, and, by the way, over the last few months, there have been problems in Tunisia and the Ivory Coast.  I make no review of what was said in Barack Obama's public statement, but I simply note he made a speech.  I do note that, in 2009, Barack Obama did not back the protesters in Iraq, who were angry with the events of an election and protesting against the tyrannical goverment--hard-line Sharia supporters--and I say that Barack Obama cannot be trusted, and, in fact, I say that Barack Obama is more likely to promote a more radical government in Egypt than what is in Egypt now, hoping for a Sharia-based government entity like that in Iran, especially since he has supported and made friends with hard-line dictators around the world over the last two years.  Hold it!  I have changed my mind.  I have to make a comment about the event.  It seems Barack Obama is very concerned with the Internet, cell-phone service, and, especially, social networks, all the things that mean much to naive young Americans, especially with social-networking stuff, which they seem to be involved with from morning to night and, maybe, late at night.  Barack Obama covered that social-network stuff and such early in the public statement, and it seems to me it was done to catch the attention of young Americans, who, I can say in jest, would die if they lost their social-networking stuff.  However, maybe, Barack Obama wanted to stop the blocking of information between families and such in the country and between the country and other places in the world.  What is really going on in Egypt is unclear, and maybe Barack Obama should have waited before making a public statement.  Yes, it is unclear whom should be supported and what type of revolution is going on and who is doing what.  This revolt in Egypt is not like that in Iran in 2009.]

    Tuesday, February 1, 2011 (makes a statement about Hosni Mubarak's announcement (earlier in the day) to not run for president of Egypt again in September 2011):
    "...the beginning of a new chapter in the history of a great country and a long-time partner of the United States...."  [The Muslim Brotherhood, which has ties to Hamas and al-Qaida, is a violent Islamic group or a terrorist entity pushing to have Sharia instituted all over the world, and on January 31, 2011, a represented of the Barack Obama administration met with Essam El-Erian (a leader in the Muslim Brotherhood) at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and, later in the day, the Barack Obama administration announced it could support having the Muslim Brotherhood involved in a new government in Egypt if the Muslim Brotherhood, for one, would promote democracy for Egypt (you are urged to see my document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and Barack Obama, which can be reached by using this link: Sharia).]
    "...Second, we stand for universal values, including the rights of the Egyptian people to freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, and the freedom to access information...."  [Okay.]
    "...Now, it is not the role of any other country to determine Egypt's leaders.  Only the Egyptian people can do that.  What is clear and what I indicated to President Mubarak is my belief that an orderly transition must be meaningful, it must be peaceful, and it must begin now.  Furthermore, the process must include a broad spectrum of Egyptian voices and opposition parties.  It should lead to elections that are free and fair.  And it should result in a government that's not only grounded in democratic principles but is also responsive to the aspirations of the Egyptian people...."  [The Barack Obama administration met with a terrorist group--the Muslim Brotherhood--that is working to install Sharia in all the countries of the Middle East and in other countries around the world, and yet Barack Obama said that "...it is not the role of any other country to determine Egypt's leaders...."]

    Thursday, February 3, 2011 (at Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania):
    "...But our homes and our businesses use forty percent of the energy.  They contribute to forty percent of the carbon pollution that we produce, and that is contributing to climate change.  It costs us billions dollars in energy bills.  They waste huge amounts of energy.  So the good news is we can change all that...."  [The Pied Piper of crap--Barack Obama--was out on another trip--maybe a mind trip--to pull in the ignorant and get them to follow him--a man with no science credentials, a man who is a perpetual liar, and man who hates the United States of America.  I say in jest, "Yes, let us all go back to the caves, since they have more insulation than manmade houses have."   And I say in jest, "Be aware Barack Obama will still want to tax those sticks you use to run a fire in that cave!"]

    Friday, February 4, 2011 (at a press conference at the White House with Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada):
    "...Ah, first, we continue to be crystal clear that we oppose violence as a response to this crisis.  In recent days, we have seen violence and harassment erupt on the streets of Egypt that violates human rights, universal values, and international norms.  So, we are sending a strong and unequivocal message--attacks on reporters are unacceptable, attacks on human-rights activists are unacceptable, attacks on peaceful protesters are unacceptable.  The Egyptian government has a responsibility to protect the rights of its people.  Thes, those demonstrating also have a responsibility to do so peacefully...."  [On Thursday, February 3, 2011, a big story that I heard regularly at top of the each hour during the day in ABC Radio newscasts was how reporters had been and were being harassed in Egypt, while trying to do their work, and it was as if the story of being harassed was more important than other matters.  Then, on this day, Barack Obama made this statement during a press conference that focused on events in Egypt and on talks between Canada and the United States of America about trade and such.  The press conference ended in the three o'clock hour in the after noon on this day, then in the top of the hour newscast for the four o'clock hour of the afternoon, the ABC Radio newscast played a portion of the text that I present in this paragraph, such as "..attacks on reporters...."  Yes, the bad media members wanted papa--Barack Obama--to give them support, and he did, and then the bad media played Barack Obama's call for peace upon them.]
    "...I have also said, ah, in light of what's happened over the last two weeks, ah, going back, ah, to the old ways, ah, is not gonna work.  Suppression's not gonna work.  Engaging in violence is not gonna work.  An, attempting to shut down information flow is not gonna work.  In order for Egypt to have a bright future--which I believe it can have--the only thing that will work is moving a ordering transition process that begins right now, that engages all the parties, that leads to democratic practices, fair and free elections and rep, representative government that is responsive, ah, to the grievances, ah, to the Egyptian people...."  [Yes, Barack Obama shows his support for this idea--Hosni Mubarak should leave now.  I say, "Yes, the Muslim Brotherhood is going to make big gains in Egypt."  The world is fundamentally changing during the days of the Barack Obama administration.]

    Sunday, February 6, 2011 (an interview with Bill O'Reilly (of Fox News Channel) for Super Bowl XLV pre-game show on Fox TV, which ran about 15 minutes):
    "...I think the Muslim Brotherhood is one faction in Egypt.  They don't have majority support in Egypt.  They are...but they are well organized, and there are strains of their ideology that are anti-U.S.  There's no doubt about it.  But here's the thing that we have to understand.  There are a whole bunch of, ah, secular folks in Egypt.  There are a whole bunch of, ah, educators and, ah, civil society in Egypt that wants to come to the fore as well, and so it's important for us not to say that are only two options are either the Muslim Brotherhood or a suppress Egyptian people...." [The men who created The United States Constitution and the United States of America were not men who had "enslavism" in mind for a form of government--they had wanted and they created a government that is based on "the individual" and not "an individual" (or a particular individual, such as a king).  In addition, the men who created the United States of America were not trying to make positions in government for themselves, such as create jobs for themselves or seats in government for themselves.  The Muslim Brotherhood is an entity that supports "enslavism"--particularly Sharia--and it is a terrorist entity, and the Muslim Brotherhood is working to gain power--and not power for the citizens of Egypt.  If the Muslim Brotherhood is involved in any way in creating a new government for Egypt, the attempt at creating a good government for Egypt will fail, since the Muslim Brotherhood will undermine the work to make a good government, making sure it has power within the government.  It is not good that all possible types of people are involved in creating a government--at least a government for the people and by the people--since some people should never be involved in creating a government.  Crappy people create crappy political systems, and that is why most countries in history have had crappy governments.  Commentary: "For the record," I say that, if the Muslim Brotherhood is involved in making a government for Egypt, Egypt is a lost cause or is done for in the long run, since you cannot compromise with crap.]
    "..What I want is a representative government in Egypt, and I have confidence that, if Egypt moves in an orderly transition process, that we'll have a government in Egypt that we can work with together as a partner...."  [Eh!]
    "...Well, I think the judge in Florida is wrong.  Keep in mind that we've had twelve judges that said that, that just threw this case out...."  [It was on Monday, January 31, 2011, U.S. District Court Judge Roger Vinson--working a case in which 26 states had been fighting the federal government--ruled that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is null and void, being unconstitutional, and I have seen the ruling, and I know the judgment is correct, and you are urged to see my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this link: Health).  Here, Barack Obama tried to compare the case involving Judge Roger Vinson with proposed cases.  Whatever potential cases had been thrown out have no bearing on the judgment made by Judge Roger Vinson, since every case is difference or the circumstances of each case is different from all others.  Here, I do show that Barack Obama disagrees with judgment that I know is good, and I know Barack Obama cannot defend his position well--Barack Obama's thoughts would be nonsense logic.]
    "...What we said was--If you got health care, you keep it...."  [Liar!]
    "...No!...."   [This was the response to Bill O'Reilly's wondering if Barack Obama was going to move to the "center," which would be to move away from his "leftist"-style or "leftist" political ideology, which is "enslavism."

    Monday, February 7, 2011 (at a meeting of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington, D.C.):
    "...I want to be clear--even as we make America the best place on earth to do business, businesses have a responsibility to America.  I understand the challenges you face.  I understand you are under incredible pressure to cut costs and keep your margins up.  I understand the significance of your obligations to your shareholders and the pressures that are created by quarterly reports.  I get it...."  [Of this mess, I will only note one of the defects.  Businesses in America have always had a responsibility to America, since they are made up of people who live in America and want a better life for themselves, their children, and others, and that has been the way for decades and decades and decades.  A politician need not tell any business in the country about working for the interests of Americans.  Barack Obama ran off more flap doodle or another flap-doodle lecture--and, really, it was another attack in which he showed how he feels businesses do not do good for America. Yes, Barack Obama showed he thinks businesses are uncaring entities, though they are made up of people who have families and friends and wish to do better for them.  Think about this--Businesses are not in business to do bad, because they would go out of business, but Barack Obama thinks the purpose of businesses is to do bad.  Barack Obama surely does have an odd mind--a defective mind.]
    "...As we work with you to make America a better place to do business, ask yourselves what you can do for America.  Ask yourselves what you can do to hire American workers, to support the American economy, and to invest in this nation.  [Of this mess, I will only talk about one of the defects.  What was Barack Obama's nonsense about "...ask yourselves what you can do to hire American workers...."?  American businesses hire people when there is a need for more employees--when customers ask for more services or products.  American businesses do not hire to simply hire.  Incidentally, Barack Obama sort of took a famous 1960s statement by John F. Kennedy--that one about asking not what you can do for the country--and adapted it or, in essence, stole it.]

    Thursday, February 10, 2011 (at Northern Michigan University in Marquette, Michigan):
    "...We are following today's events in Egypt very closely, ah, and we'll have more to say as this plays out.  But what is absolutely clear is that we are witnessing history unfold.  It's a moment of transformation that's taking place because the people of Egypt are calling for change.  They've turned out in extraordinary numbers representing all ages and all walks of life, but it's young people who've been at the forefront--the new generation, your generation who want their voices to be heard.  And so going forward, we want those young people and we want all Egyptians to know America will continue to do everything we can to support an orderly and genuine trans, transition to democracy in Egypt...."  [This statement can make a person wonder.  Here, for one, it seems possible to me Barack Obama tried to make the students at the university feel like the students who were protesting in Egypt at the time, and, for instance, that might give the students at the university the impression that, if Barack Obama were not around and if they wanted a voice in government, they might consider protesting to get a voice in government, which had been done by radical students in the 1960s.  Then again, maybe Barack Obama was promoting the idea that students at the university should keep pushing for his agenda to be enacted and rebel against what the nation was founded as.  I noticed, up to this date, the protesting in Egypt was confined to, in essence, Cairo, which might seem to indicate people--Egyptians--all over Egypt were not fully supportive of the protesting, and it could indicate radicals from other countries, such as those associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, were taking part and helping to guide the protests and were centering their protesting operations in Cairo (it would be hard for the radicals to set up operations in many cities, which would spread out their personnel, and, anyway, maybe they thought they only needed to make a big noise in one city to create changes).  Really, the young people who were protesting at this time in Egypt had nothing in common with the young people at the university, except maybe their minds were easily manipulated by charlatans like Barack Obama.  Truly, it is yet unclear who was behind the protesting or was guiding the protesting--since what was in the minds of the leaders--whoefer they were--was unknown.  I note that I heard no person or set of persons proclaim loudly that they were leaders of the protests, and the media members did not clearly indicate who was running the protests.  By the way, around December 2009, Jodie Evans, Bernadine Dohrn, and Bill Ayers were in Egypt and involved in protests related to the "Free Gaza" movement; Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers are close friends of Barack Obama's, and both--U.S. citizens--were involved in terrorism acts in the United States of America around the late 1960s and early 1970s, and Jodie Evans is a friend of Barack Obama's, and, for one, Jodie Evans was involved in Barack Obama's presidential fundraising campaign of 2008.  I wonder if Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers passed along their rules about protesting to people in Egypt, such as radicals, when they were in Egypt in December 2009.  You are urged to see the "William Ayers" section of "The Second List" part of my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which can be reached by using this link: Crud.]

    Friday, February 11, 2011 (at the White House):
    "...Good afternoon, everybody.  There are very few moments in our lives where we have the privilege to witness history taking place.  This is one of those moments.  This is one of those times...."  [These were the opening few lines for a press conference that focused on Hosni Mubarak's resignation as the leader of Egypt, which has happened a few hours previously.]
    "...The people of Egypt have spoken, their voices have been heard, and Egypt will never be the same...."  [This statement makes me wonder--Did the people of Egypt really speak or did people from Egypt, some of whom were Muslim Brotherhood members, and radicals from other countries speak?]
    "...I'm sure there will be difficult days ahead, and many questions remain unanswered.  But I am confident the people of Egypt can find the answers and do so peacefully, constructively, and in the spirit of unity that has defined these last few weeks--for Egyptians have made it clear that nothing less than genuine democracy will carry the day...."  [The Muslim Brotherhood does not work for democracy, and it looks as if the Muslim Brotherhood will be involved in creating a new government for Egypt.]
    "...Above all, this transition must bring all the Egypt's voices to the table...."  [Here, Barack Obama was talking about the transition to a new government, but when people who do not support democracy get to put together a constitution or a structure for a government, you ultimately do not get a democracy--at least, not in the long run.]
    "...I'm also confident that the same ingenuity and entrepreneurial spirit that the young people in Egypt have shown in recent days can be harnessed to create new opportunity, jobs, and businesses that allow the extraordinary potential of this generation to take flight...."  [Okay, what the heck was he talking about?  I cannot figure it out.  Barack Obama is anti-capitalism.  Well, let me make fun of Barack Obama here and use my imagination.  Maybe, Barack Obama was talking about the people who made protest signs (in English) that stated--maybe--"Mubarak go home!" and who sold the signs and made money.  Maybe, Barack Obama was talking about the people who made anti-Mubarak T-shirts and sold the T-shirts and made money.  Maybe, Barack Obama was talking about the lunch-cart vendors who made money by selling food to the protesters.  Maybe, Barack Obama was talking about the people who were operating the coin-operated portable toilets and made pounds and pounds of coins.  Do you see my jokes?  Have you come up with a reason why Barack Obama would talk about the "ingenuity and entrepreneurial spirit" of the last few days?]
    "...Thank you."  [Yes, that is it, and it is very likely Egypt will be more anti-U.S. and anti-Israel in the future, which, it seems to me, Barack Obama wanted.]

    Monday, February 14, 2011 (at press conference about submitting to the U.S. Congress a proposed budget for fiscal year 2012):
    "...I'll be talking about the need to invest in education in places like Parkville so that every American is equipped to compete with any worker anywhere in the world.  These investments are an essential part of the budget my administration is sending to Congress, because I'm convinced that if we out build and out innovate and out educate as well as out hustle the rest of the world, the jobs and industries of our time will take root here in the United States, our people will prosper, and our country will succeed.  But I'm also convinced that the only way we can make these investments in our future is if our government starts living within its means, we start taking responsibility for our deficits.  That's why, ah, when I was sworn in as President, I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term.  The budget I'm proposing today meets that pledge and puts us on a path to pay for what we spend by the middle of the decade.  We do this part by eliminating waste and cutting whatever spending we can do without.   Ah, as I start, ah, as a start, I've called for a freeze on annual domestic spending over the next five years.  This freeze would cut the deficit by more than four-hundred-billion dollars over the next decade, bringing this kind of spending--domestic discretionary spending--to its lowest share of our economy since Dwight Ousen, Eisenhower was President...."  [On this day, Barack Obama presented a sham, and to learn more, you should see the section called "90. Submits a Fiscal Year 2012 Budget to the U.S. Congress" of my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this link: History).  I could talk about Barack Obama's statement, but I will not, and I will only simply use it to note the speech.  However, I want to talk about the word "convinced."  How did Barack Obama get convinced?  Who convinced him?  What convinced him?  In the past, Barack Obama has noted that he was or is "convinced."  I always wonder when Barack Obama uses the word "convinced"--What or who convinced him?  And I say that knowing his general knowledge about so many subjects, especially economics, is weak.]

    Tuesday, February 15, 2011 (at a press conference in Washington, D.C., at the White House):
    "...Just like every family in America, the federal government has to do two things at once--it has to live within its means, while still investing in the future.  If you're a family tryin' to cut back, you might skip going out to dinner, you might put off a vacation, but you wouldn't wanna sacrifice saving for your kids' college education or making key repairs in your house, so you cut back on what you can't afford to focus on what you can't do without.  And that's what we've done with this year's budget...."  [On February 14, 2011, Barack Obama presented his proposed fiscal budget 2011 to the U.S. Congress, and it--if passed--would set deficit spending for 2012 at about $1,600,000,000,000 (or 1.6-trillion dollars), even though the proposed budget also contained about 1.6-trillion dollars in increased taxes, and you can learn more about the proposed budget by seeing my document entitled The 2012 Dysfunctional Budget from Barack Obama: More Evidence He is Working to Kill the Economy, which can be reached by using this link: Economy.]
    "...I recognize that there are gonna be plenty of arguments in the months to come, and everybody's gonna have to give a little bit.  But when it comes to difficult choices about our budget and our priorities, we have found common ground before.  Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill came together to save Social Security.  Bill Clinton and the Republican Congress eventually found a way to settle their differences and balance the budget.  And many Democrats and Republicans in Congress today came together in December to pass a tax cut that has made American's pay checks a little bigger this year and will spur on additional economic growth this year.  So, I believe we can find this common ground...."  [Barack Obama lied again.  Barack Obama does not work to find common ground, he works to get as much as he can that is bad for the country.  ]
    "...Ah, well, I continue to believe I'm right.  So, we're gonna try again.  Ah, I think what's different is everybody says now that they're really serious about the deficit.  Well, if you're really serious about the deficit--not just spending--but you serious about the deficit overall, then part of what you have to look at is unjustifiable spending through the tax code, through tax breaks that do not make us more competitive, do not create jobs here in the United States of America...."  [This set of words shows the evilness and defectiveness of Barack Obama.  For one, here, Barack Obama showed he thinks all money in the country belongs to the government, because, in essence, to him, the government owns the people and what the people make and what the people supposedly have.  Barack Obama as a politician creates nothing, but Barack Obama thinks he owns what you make and what you have and believes he can do what he wants with the your stuff and move around or spread it around as he likes and wishes.  Think about this--Barack Obama noted that, by lowering taxes on the people, the government is giving up what it owns, though it does not own it.  In addition, Altought Barack Obama did not use the words "other countries," Barack Obama hinted that, by lowering taxes, the country becomes less competitive with other countries, and that idea is giant nonsense.]
    "...And that's why I'm eager to find excessive spending wherever we find it--in domestic spending, but also in defense spending, health-care spending, and spending that is embedded in the tax code...."  [Yes, there is that "tax code" thing again, which was the main subject of the previous paragraph, and my presenting this paragraph wit another quotation shows you his "tax code" thing was not a one-time thing.]
    "...On Iraq, we were clear then, and we are clear now that what has been true in Egypt should be true in Iran, which is that people should be able to express their opinions and their grievances and seek a more responsive government.  What's been different is the Iranian government's response, which is ta shoot people and beat people and arrest people.  America cannot ultimately, ah, dictate what happens inside of Iran, anymore than it could inside of Egypt.  Ultimately, these are sovereign countries that are gonna have ta make their own decisions...."   [Within the past day or so, there had been protests in Iran, and the Iranian government killed people who were protesting, and, here, Barack Obama showed he was not going to scold the Iranian rulers, which is not surprising, since,  in the past, Barack Obama has supported the rulers in Iran, as if they were friends.]
    "...We have sent a strong message ta our allies in the region, saying--Let's look at Egypt's example, as opposed to Iran's example.  Ah, you know, ah, I find it ironic that you've got, ah, the Iranian regime pretending to celebrate what happened in Egypt, but, in fact, they have acted in direct contrast to what happened in Egypt by gunning down and beating, ah, people who were trying to express themselves peaceful in Iran.  Ah, and I also think that, dah, an important lesson, and, and I mentioned this, ah, last week, ah, that we can draw from this is real change in these societies is not gonna happen because of terrorism.  It's not gonna happen because, ah, you go around killing innocents.  It's gonna happen because people come together, ah, and, ah, apply moral force to a situation.  Ah, that's what garners international support. That's what garners in, internal support.  Ah, that's how you bring about lasting change...."  [I shall not comment on the substance this time.  I want you to look at the speech pattern.  It shows Barack Obama's sloppiness when he does not use a teleprompter.  Also, notice that I used "gonna" in my text version of his statement.  When some people talk, they combine "going" and :"to" into "gonna," and it is bad speech and a bad use of English.  I have simply reported what Barack Obama did.]
    "...over the next decade and bring annual domestic spending to its lower shi*, share of the economy since Dwight Eisenhower...."  [Yes, Barack Obama surely did speak shi* at this press conference.]

    Thursday, February 17, 2011:
    "...On the other hand, ah, some of what I've heard comin' where, ah, you're just making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain generally, ah, seems like more an assault on unions...."  [In Wisconsin, over the last few days, teachers--Marxists and such--were protesting because the governor of Wisconsin--Scott Walker (a Republican)--was working to get a bill passed to, for instance, get teachers to from now on pitch in to the pot for covering the costs their health care, to set up a defined-contribution plan for teachers hired after July 2011, and to make it so that collective bargains would be set up only for wages--no teachers were being layoff or fired, even though the state had a big budget deficit (somewhere around four-billion dollars).  So that no vote could go forth in the Senate of Wisconsin on, for example, February 17, 2011, the Democrats in the Senate of Wisconsin got on a bus and left Wisconsin, and they ended up in Illinois, such as at the Best Western Clock Tower Resort in Rockford, Illinois, for a short while.  Yes, while the economy of the country is stalled and the unemployment rate is high, teachers in Wisconsin were protesting against that the idea that they might have to cut back a little, though the public, which pays for the teachers, was cutting back on things, even losing jobs and losing homes.  Because of teachers were protesting and not working, at least one school district got shut down around this time.  Once again, Barack Obama showed he is full of crap, since such a local matter should not receive any comment from a U.S. President--it is not the job of a U.S. President to take sides and, for example, support a union or unions.  In addition, by the way, some protesters, such as on the previous day, were comparing the governor of Wisconsin to Hosni Mubarak, who had resigned as president of Egypt only a few days  previously (Hosni Mubarak had been like a dictator for thirty years), and an often-repeated statement from the crowd was: "Kill the bill!".  On February 16, 2011, Wisconsin State Representative Cory Mason, who on the following day would be on the run, said, "...When a Washington Post columnist compares your government to the deposed dictator of Egypt, you've gone too far!....", and Maureen Look-Ainsworth (who had been a teacher of the year in Wisconsin recently) said, "...Although Governor Walker does not have a college education, I bet he wants to have a college education.  I would bet that he would want his children to do well and be excited about school and excel.  He just doesn't wanna have the responsibility of paying for the quality education...."  You will see that I used "wanna" in the previous paragraph, which is a non-standard word and is a defective English word (a combining of "want" and "to"), but Maureen Look-Ainsworth used it.  Yes, this overall event of history showed off more of the bad of the National Education Association, particularly the management, the members of whom acted like good hard-line liberals, and they were given backing by Barack Obama, a communist.  You should see the "91. Takes a Public Stand a Local Labor Issue in Wisconsin" section of my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this link: History, and you should see the section about Scott Walker in the document entitled Patriots of the U.S.A. and the Counter-Counter Revolution, which can be reached by using this link: Patriots.]

    Tuesday, February 22, 2011 (in Cleveland, Ohio):
    "...I've spent, ah, the last month, ah, since the State of the Union sharing my vision for an America that remains the best place on Earth to do business, an America that competes aggressively for every job and every industry that's out there, an America that wins the future.  A part of that means making sure that government lives within its means, just like you do...."  [Think!  Barack Obama has added several trillions to the national debt in the last two years and his proposal for the 2012 fiscal year for the federal government includes a deficit of about sixteen-hundred-billion dollars.  Since February 15, 2011, a big new story around the country has been the protesting going on in Wisconsin about the push by the governor of Wisconsin to balance the budget of Wisconsin, and since that day, Barack Obama has showed he is working against the governor of Wisconsin, such as by publicly supporting the strikers.  See the previous entry of this document for more information and links to other documents with more information about the protesting and the budget fight in Wisconsin.]
    "...We spent the day in break-out sessions taking about five areas of obstacle and opportunity for America's small business.  We had, ah, a terrific discussion.  The groups that I participated in, ah, were remarkable and had great ideas.  I know the members of the cabinet, ah, had fun, which is why we're goin' do it again.  Over the next several months, what we're going to be doing is teaming up with mayors and governors and small-business owners to host a series of these jobs forums across the country...."  [Yes, Barack Obama is promising that there will be more forums and that people will be able to make public their "great ideas" and such.  Let me look at that promise in another way.  If people talk and pass along their ideas about what they think will be good for the country, then Barack Obama will have information about what he should not do--he can do everything that is opposite of what is wanted.]

    Wednesday, February 23, 2011 (comments about Libya at the White House):
    "...First, we are doing everything we can to protect American citizens.  That is my highest priority.  In Libya, we've urged our people to leave the country, and the State Department is assisting those in need of support...."  [Barack Obama had U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at his side when he spoke about Libya, and during the entire event, he never mentioned the name "Muammar al-Gaddafi," the dictator of Libya and killer, who had been the head of Libya since September 1, 1969.  When riots were going on Egypt recently, Barack Obama publicly urged the president of Egypt--Hosni Mubarak--to step down.  On this day, Barack Obama did not urge Muammar al-Gaddafi to step down.]
    "...As I said last week, we strongly condemn the use of violence in Libya.  The American people extend our deepest condolences to the families and loved ones of all who've been killed and injured.  Suffering and bloodshed is outrageous, and it is unacceptable.  So are threats or orders to shoot peaceful protesters and further punish the people of Libya.  These actions violate international norms and every standard of common decency.  This violence must stop...." [Think about this.  Barack Obama in this statement did not clearly define who might be threatening or giving orders to people to shoot other people. Barack Obama just could not make himself say "Muammar al-Gaddafi," but that is not surprising since history shows Barack Obama just cannot bring himself to criticize or condemn brothers in arms--dictators--by name.]
    "...In a volatile situation like this one, it is imperative that the nations and peoples of the world speak with one voice, and that, that has been our focus.  Yesterday, a unanimous U.N. Security Council sent a clear message that it condemns violence in Libya, supports accountability for the perpetrators, and stands with the Libya people...."  [Barack Obama talked about "perpetrators" here, and again Barack Obama did not give a clear indication who the "perpetrators" are in his mind.]

    Monday, February 28, 2011 (at the National Governors Association meeting):
    "...So, a few weeks ago, Oregon Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat, and Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown, a Republican, and Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu, they proposed legislation that would accelerate that provision, so it would allow states to apply for such a waver by 2014, instead of 2017.  I think that's a reasonable proposal.  I support it.  It will give you flexibility more quickly while still guaranteeing the American people reform.  If your state can create a plan that covers as many people as affordably and comprehensively as the Affordable Care Act does without increasing the deficit, you can implement that plan, and we'll work with you to do it...."  [This statement is loaded with crap.  Basically, Barack Obama is promoting the idea of allowing states to create state-run health-care systems much sooner--going from 2014 to 2017--as long as the systems meet the requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.  Barack Obama is not promoting any compromise here; he is simply pushing more of the crap in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.  I must add this thought or prediction from Mark R. Levin, which he had passed along on his national syndicated radio show (The Mark Levin Show) on February 28, 2011--once some more states enact state-run health-care systems, some people will start up court cases that are designed to push for a national health-care system, using the idea that people are not being treated equally in health care thoughout the country or the people of all the states do not have the same health-care options available to them.  That idea about the court cases could lead to the creation of crap--a federal government-run health-care system pushed along bad judges in the court system, such as in the U.S. Supreme Court.]

    Monday, February 28, 2011 (at the White House):
    "...I don't think it does anybody any good when public employees are denigrated or vilified or their rights are infringed upon.  We need to attract the best and the brightest to public service.  These times demand it.  We aren't gonna attract the best teachers for our kids, for example, if they only make a fraction of what other professionals make.  You're not gonna convince the bravest Americans to put their lives on the line as police officers or firefighters if we don't properly reward that bravery...."  [Barack Obama passed--no football--a lot of garbage on in this statement, only some of which I will comment on.  Today, teachers are not getting "a fraction of what other professionals make."  Some teachers, as is known about those in Wisconsin because of the protesting and reporting going on in Wisconsin, can make good pay and benefits, well over $100,000.00 in total.  Anyway, you should ask yourself--"What 'professionals' did Barack Obama have in mind?  Different professions have different pay scales and different educational requirements and different skill requirements.  Gosh, those teachers just do not make what those "professional" football players make.  I say in jest--"Ahhhhhh!  We've got to fix the problem.  We need to pay all teachers $35 million a year."  Incidentally, in recent years, it looks as if the country has not been hiring the best teachers, or students and American would be smarter.  Maybe, teachers should be paid less.]
    "...So, yes, we need a conversation about pensions and Medicare and Medicaid and other promises that we've made as a nation, an those will be tough conversations but necessary conversations.  As we make these decisions about our budget--going forward though--I believe everyone should be at the table, and that a concept of shared sacrifice should prevail.  If all the pains borne by only one group, whether it's workers or seniors or the poor, while the wealthiest among us get to keep or get more tax breaks, we're not doin' the right thing.  I think that's something the Democrats and Republicans should be able to agree on...."  [This statement is a type that is purposely used to incite hatred amongst peoples--it is "class warfare" talk.  That is the way of the communist--Rile up the poor and such and make them push for reform from the government.  Here, Barack Obama was working to rile up people and was hoping those people will push for him to attack others through laws.  Yes, in other words, a thug was trying to gather up a gang behind him.]

    Friday, March 11, 2011 (a press conference at the White House):
    "...But over the past year as the economy's picked up steam and global demand for oil has increased, prices have increased again.  Turmoil in North African and the Middle East has added uncertainty to the mix, and loss production in Libya has tightened supply...."    [On this day--earlier--an earthquake struck Japan, and this press conference opened with Barack Obama's making statements about Japan, and then Barack Obama did some reading and talking, and then Barack Obama did a question-and-answer session, in which Barack Obama offered answers in a highly labored and boring manner.  This was a statement during his reading-and-speaking session, and this statement was one piece of crap that came out of the mouth of Barack Obama.  Libya only produces two percent of the oil supply for the world each year, and eighty-five percent of that two percent goes to Europe.  The loss of oil production in Libya means nothing to the United States of America.]
    "...Here at home, everybody should know that, should the situation demand it, we're are prepared to tap the significant stockpile of oil that we have in the 'Strategic Petroleum Reserve...."  [The Strategic Petroleum Reserve has a thirty-day supply.]
    "...Now, the hard true is that, as long as our economy depends on foreign oil, we'll always be subject ta price spikes, so we've got to get moving on a comprehensive strategy that pursues both more energy production and more energy conservation.  We need to increase our access to secure energy supplies in the near term, and we've got to make our economy more energy efficient and energy apendant, independent over the long run.  Sss, let me be more specific.  First, we need to continue to boost domestic production of oil and gas.  Last year, American oil production reached its highest level since 2003.  Let me repeat that.  Ah, our oil production reached its highest level in seven years.  Oil production from federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico reached an all-time high.  For the first time in more than a decade, imports accounted for less than half of what we consumed.  So any notion that my administration has shut down oil production might make for a good political sound bite, but it doesn't match up with reality. We are encouraging offshore exploration and production.  We're just doin' it responsibly...."  [Okay.  Look alive.  In mid-2010, the Barack Obama shut down or blocked oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico from operating, so how could there have been an "all-time high" in production in the Gulf of Mexico?  Something does ring true--Barack Obama.]
    "...And we've approved more than thirty-five new offshore drilling permits that meet these new safety and environmental standards...."  [Oh.]
    "...There is more we can do however.  For example, right now, the industry holds leases on tens of millions of acres, both offshore and on land, where they aren't producing a thing.  So, I've directed the Interior Department to determine just how many of these leases are going undeveloped and report back to me within two weeks so that we can encourage companies to develop the leases they hold and produce American energy.  People deserve to know that the energy they depend on is being developed in a timely manner..."    [Yes, here, Barack Obama worked to make the oil companies look bad and worked to make it look as if the oil companies have been the problem that oil areas are not being developed.]
    "...Even if we started drilling new wells tomorrow, that oil isn't coming on line over night, and it, and even if we tap every single reserve available to us, we can't escape the fact that we only control two percent of the world's oil but we consume over a quarter of the world's oil...."  [Here is that "two percent/quarter" idea that Barack Obama has brought up in some form in the past.  How much oil is used in the world has no bearing on how much we use, and just because we use more oil than many other countries do has no bearing on drilling for oil, and, for one, it simply means a lot of countries do not do anything with oil, which is why they have no manufacturing to speak of and they do not have many things that make life better and safer.  Oh, I do not believe the "two percent" figure anyway--it is at the very least misleading.]
    "...So beyond increased domestic production, if we want to secure our long-term prosperity and protect the American people from more severe oil shocks in the future, the way to do it is to gradually reduce demand and then do everything we can ta break our dependence on oil...."  [What does Barack Obama mean in his idea "dependence on oil"?  The country uses nuclear energy and coal energy and more, so the country is not "dependent" on oil, but the country cannot stop using oil, since oil is needed to make a countless number of products.  The world will not stop using oil.]
    "...And in this sta, this year's State of the Union Address, I set a goal for America--By 2035, eighty percent of our electricity will come from a broad array of clean energy sources, from renewables like wind and solar and homegrown biofuels along with natural gas, clean coal, and nuclear power...."  [You are urge to see my document entitled Michigan Travel Tips #83, which can be reached by using this Travel #83 link, my document entitled T.H.A.T. #83, which can be reached by using this T.H.A.T. #83 link, and my document entitled The Power and the Power Killers: Energy in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this Power link.  When you read those documents, you will wonder how the country is going to do well with millions of wind turbines sticking up out of the ground.  How unsightly millions of wind turbines would be set up around the country near all the cities.  Keep Palm Springs, California, in mind.  To date, Barack Obama has done almost nothing to make it worthwhile for nuclear-power-plant makers to do their work, and, in the past, Barack Obama has actually put down the use of coal in the country and has hurt the coal industry.]
    "...Ah, the Republicans in the House passed a budget, ah, that has now been rejected in the Senate.  They are not going to get a hundred percent of what they want.  Ah, the Democrats have put forward spending cuts, many of them pretty painful, that give Republicans already half of what they were seekin' because they're the right thing to do.  Many of those cuts are ones that were already embodied in the budget for 2012.  Now that's been rejected as well.  Now, here's what you know that both sides are gonna have to sit down and compromise on prudent cuts somewhere between what the Republicans were seeking that's not been rejected and what the Democrats, ah, had agreed to that has also been rejected...."  [The budget theme, here, is related to the 2011 budget, which is estimated to have a one-point-five-trillion dollar deficit.  So the Democrats in the U.S. Congress had proposed a handful of billions in cuts, and the Republicans in the U.S. Congress proposed two handfuls of cuts.  Now, the two groups in the U.S. Congress are going to compromise, and what you can say is that there will be very little removed from the one-point-five-trillion budget deficit.  And Barack Obama's budget proposal for 2012 has an estimated one-point-six-trillion dollar deficit.  There should be many, many billions cut for 2011 and for 2012!]
    "...Last point I'll make on the budget--ah, the Republican budget that passed out of the House, ah, included a whole range of what are called 'riders.'  Ah, these aren't really budget items.  Ah, these are political statements.  And I want, eh, eh, I've, I've said again directly to Speaker Boehner that we're happy to discuss, ah, any of these riders but my general view is, ah, let's not, ah, try to sneak political agendas into a budget debate.  You know, if, if, ah, Republicans are interested in social issues that they want to promote, ah, they should put a bill on the floor of the House and promote it, have and up or down vote, send it over to the Senate, but don't try ta, ah, use, ah, the budget, ah, as a way ta, ah, promote an political or ideological agenda.  I think that's the American people's view as well...."  [Here is where Barack Obama let a lot of crap slip out between his lips.  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was supposed to be an authorization bill, but the Democrats (Barack Obama and in the Democrats in the U.S. Congress) who pushed it into law had put appropriations in it that were automatic spending features.  That was at least unethical.  You are urged to see "Special Note 75," "Special Note 76," "Special Note #78," and "Special Note #79" of my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this link: Health," to learn more.  Barack Obama not only speaks out of both sides of this mouth but also he speaks crap out of both sides of his mouth.]
    Note: No questions were asked about the events going on in Wisconsin, such as the work by Governor Scott Walker to get control of spending in the state and balance the budget, so it seems the press members in the press room--controlled Democrats (Marxists and communists, of course)--purposely avoided the subject.

    Thursday, March 17, 2011 (comments about Japan from the White House)
    "Good afternoon, everyone.  For the last several days, the American people have been both heartbroken and deeply concerned about the developments in Japan.  We've seen an earthquake and tsunami render unimaginable, ah, an unimaginable toll of death and destruction on one of our closest friends and allies in the world...."  [On March 11, 2011, a earthquake took place a little off the coast of Japan in the Pacific Ocean.  On March 11, 2011, Barack Obama made some comments about the event, but it was not till March 17, 2011, that Barack Obama made a long speech about the event.  Barack Obama talked, and I listened, and the speech was simply a collection of words, and I felt there was nothing to really comment about.  All I do with this section is note that Barack Obama spoke on this day about Japan.  By the way, Barack Obama took no questions from the press on any subject or answered any questions from the press (while Barack Obama walked away, at least one reporter yelled out a question, which was about Libya).]

    Friday, March 18, 2011 (comments about Libya):
    "...I also want to be clear about what we will not be doing.  The United States is not going to deploy ground troops into Libya, and we are not going to use force to go beyond a well-defined goal--specifically the protection of civilians in Libya.  In the coming weeks, we will continue to help the Libyan people with humanitarian and economic assistance so that they can fulfill their aspirations peacefully...."  [On March 17, 2011, the United Nations Security Council voted of a "no-fly zone" for Muammar Qaddafi's forces in Libya (at the time, Muammar Qaddafi was the leader in Libya), and on March 18, 2011, Barack Obama commented on Libya and what the United States of America is doing and going to do, and I have nothing to say about the speech other than Barack Obama made the speech--it was, in essence, stock stuff from a politician.]

    Saturday, March 19, 2011 (in Brasilia, Brazil):
    "...I have told her [President Dilma Rouseff of Brazil] that the United States wants to be a major customer...."  [On Saturday, March 19, 2011, Barack Obama arrived in Brazil for a two-day visit.  Barack Obama, of course, was going to meet with the President of Brazil, a woman named Dilma Rousseff, who had gained the office through election--as the candidate for the "Workers' Party"--on January 1, 2011, and who is a Marxist, who had fought in Brazil as a Marxist gorilla fighter against an existing government, and who had been the "Energy Minister" in Brazil at one time (starting in 2002).  The statement that I report for this section is about oil, and it notes that he is willing to say that the United States of America will buy oil from Brazil, which, it seems to me, will become more Marxist in tone in the years to come, which, it seems to me, will suit Barack Obama, who is a communist and radical.   By the way, Barack Obama has been blocking the drilling for oil in water or land related to the United States of America.  You are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this Carbon link, and my document entitled The Oil-Rig Disaster of April 20, 2010: Evidence that Shows Barack Obama Purposely Wanted to Hurt the Beaches, which can be reached by using this link: Oil Rig.]

    Monday, March 21, 2011 (in Chile, which is a country in South America):
    "...Ah, I think it's also important to note that, ah, the way that the U.S. took leadership and managed this process ensures international legitimacy and ensures that our partners--members of the international coalition--are, ah, bearing burden of, ah, ah, following through on the mission as well, because, as you know, there's been in a past, there have been times where the United States acted unilaterally or did not have full international support, ah, and as a consequence, ah, typically, it was the United States military that ended up bearing the entire burden...."  [Here is an example of the elegance--I say in jest--that Barack Obama has when speaking and putting down the United States of America for having, in the past, taken on bad people without the backing of the world community, which, I say, is made up of mostly communists, dictators, socialists, and other enslavists who are not supportive of the United States of America.  Yes, Barack Obama tried to show that, in relation to the military action being taken in Libya, he has taken a backseat to the action, and that, in the future, he cannot be blamed for whatever happens that goes wrong.  Yes, Barack Obama even put in a bit of apology on behalf of the United States of America, his feeling, it seems, he had to apologize for the times when the United States of America acted alone in military actions in the past.]

    Monday, March 28, 2011 (a 7:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time talk to the Nation about Libya from Fort McNair in Washington, D.C.):
    "...Tonight, we are fulfilling that pledge--our most effective alliance, NATO, has taken command of the enforcement of arms embargo and the no-fly zone.  Last night, NATO decided to take on the additional responsibility of protecting Libyan civilians.  This transfer from the United States to NATO will take place on Wednesday.  Going forward, the lead in enforcing the no-fly zone and protecting civilians on the ground will transition to our allies and partners, and I am fully confident that our coalition will keep the pressure on Gaddafi's remaining forces.  In that effort, the United States will play a supporting role, including intelligence, logistical support, search-and-rescue assistance, and capabilities to jam regime communication...."  [Okay.]
    "...Moreover, America has an important strategic interest in preventing Gaddafi from overrunning those who oppose him.  A massacre would have driven thousands of additional refu, refugees across Libya's borders, putting enormous strains on the peaceful yet fragile transitions in Tunisia and Egypt.  The democratic impulses that dawning across the region will be eclipsed by the darkest form of dictatorship, as repressive leaders concluded that violence is the best strategy to clean house...."  [Okay.  "Democratic impulses"--this was in Barack Obama's mind.  However, On Thursday, March 24, 2011, a story published by The New York Times noted that, really, the Muslim Brotherhood is highly involved in the development of the new government in Egypt right now (Blackman, Michael.  "Islamist Group Is Rising Force in a New Egypt."  The New York Times, 24 March 2011.).  (You should see my document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and Barack Obama, which can be reached by using this link: Sharia.)]
    "...There will be times, though, when our safety is not directly threatened, but our interests and our values are.  Sometimes, the course of history poses challenges our common humanity and our common security, responding to natural disasters, for example, or preventing genocide and keeping the peace, ensuring regional security, and maintaining the flow of commerce...."  [Okay.  And what has been going on in the Congo for years?  And what has been going on in the Sudan for years.  And what has been going on in...?"]
   "...As we have in Libya, our task instead is to mobilize the international community for collective action, because contrary to the claims of some, American leadership is not simply a matter of going it alone and bearing all of the burden ourselves...."  [Okay.  It bothered me with I heard "...international community for collective action...."  These are the regular words used by Marxists, especially "collective."]
    "...Yes, this change will make the world more complicated for a time.  Progress will be uneven, and change will come differently for different countries.  There are places like Egypt where this change will inspire us and raise our hopes.  And then there will be places like Iran where change is fiercely suppressed...."  [Okay.  Given what I know about what is happening in Egypt, I am not inspired.  The Muslim Brotherhood is not inspiring to me.  Anyway, I wonder about the meaning of one of the sentences.  Barack Obama said, "...There are places like Egypt where change will inspire us and raise our hopes...."  If it is known the Muslim Brotherhood will in the end controlling Egypt, was Barack Obama's "us" referring to people like the Muslim Brotherhood.  Who was Barack Obama talking about?]
    "...I believe that this movement of change cannot be turned back and that we must stand along those who believe in the same core principles that have guided us through many storms--our opposition to violence directed at one's own people, our support for a set of universal rights, including the freedom of people to express themselves and chose their leaders, our support for governments that are ultimately responsive to the aspirations of the people...."  [Okay.  "Change"--what change was Barack Obama talking about?  We have no clear idea what change is coming to Libya, but I have no evidence that a worthwhile country is going to be created, and it seems very likely to me no good country will be created.]

    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 (an energy-policy speech at Georgetown University):
    "...We have been down this road before.  Remember, it was just three years ago that gas prices topped four dollars a gallon.  I remember, because I was in the middle of a presidential campaign.  Working folks certainly remember, because it hit a lot of people pretty hard.  And because we were at the height of political season, you had all kinds of slogans and gimmicks and outraged politicians waving their three-point plans for two dollar a gallon gas.  You remember that--'Drill, baby, drill.'  None of it was really gonna do anything to solve the problem...."  [This is more mush for mush-minds from Barack Obama!]
    "...Here's the bottom line.  There are no quick fixes.  Anybody who tells you otherwise isn't telling you the truth.  And we will keep on being a victim to shifts in the oil market until we finally get serious about a long-term policy for a secure affordable energy future...."  [Hey, idiot--Barack Obama-- if you look at any product or thing that can be sold, the price will go up and down over time, and you cannot stop the shifts in prices related to any product--unless a dictator sets prices all the time, which is a bad idea.  And in the matter of "quick fixes," it is fact that, over the last two years, Barack Obama has helped block fixes--ways to do more drilling.]
    "...America holds only about two percent of the world's proven oil reserves, and even if we drilled every drop of oil out of every one of those reserves, it still wouldn't be enough to meet our long-term needs...."  [Ugh!  Crap!  And more crap!]

    Wednesday, April 6, 2011 (in Pennsylvania):
    "...When government shuts down, it means that that small-business owner who's waiting, ah, to get a loan, suddenly nobody's there to process it--he may not get that loan, and that business may not open, and whoever he was planning to hire, suddenly he may not have that job that he was counting on.  It may turn out that somebody was trying to get a mortgage can't have their paperwork process by HFA--now the person who was going to sell the house what they were counting on, they can't get.  And folks who were plannin' on vacation to Yellow Stone--well, it turns out National Parks, suddenly you're closed, you're out of luck, you may have to figure out how you can get your money back...."  [These are not words that a good President would speak.  These are words from a ghetto-type man or a slum-type man, who regularly works to push hysteria.  The set of words has a number of grammar problems; for example, there is a mismatch of subject and pronoun in the second sentence (notice "the person" and "they").  And Barack Obama was at the very least misleading, especially in noting that, if the federal government shuts down, as it does on vacation days and holiday breaks, a small-business owner cannot get a loan from a financial institution, such as the bank that might be located down the street from you and is not owned by the federal government.  The set of quoted material was all crap from the "king" of crap--Barack Obama.]
    "...Eh, eh, eh, eh, I mean the fact is that you have to make compromises as a family.  That's what we are--the American family.  So Democrats and Republicans need to get together, work through their differences, keep the government running so we can focus on keeping this economy growing...."  [What is Barack Obama supposed to be doing while the Democrats and Republicans are trying to work out their differences?  Is it not the U.S. President who should be involved?  Well, may he was involved--He acted by, in essence, issuing an order for the Democrats and Republicans to work out their issues.]
    "...So now you're startin' to see demand go back up, and the prices are goin' back up.  You add on top of that what's happening in the Middle East, and it makes folks nervous, and so these folks start saying--You know what?  I'm goin' to bid a higher price on oil, on a barrel of oil now, 'cause I'm thinkin' it's goin' up, up a little further in case something happens, ah, on the world oil markets, and that pushes prices up just a little bit more...."  [I say in jest, "Such a smooth and intelligent speaker Barack Obama is when he is ad-libbing."  Look at what was said by Barack Obama.  Read the material aloud.  Study the material.  Are the words those that you would expect from an intelligent man or a smart man or a man who is the U.S. President?]
    "...But I know some of these big guys.  They're all still drivin' their big SUVs.  You know, they got their big monster trucks and everything.  You're one of them?  Well, now, here's my point.  You know, if, if you're complainin' about the price of gas, and you're only gettin' eight miles a gallon.  [He chuckled here.]  You know.  [He chuckled some more.]  Well, I, I, you may have a big family, but it's...that big.  [He chuckled even more.]  So, I mean, you have ten kids, you say?  Ten kids?  Well, you definitely need a hybrid van then...."  [This state was disturbing to me in many ways.  It is unfortunate I am unable to provide the actual audio of the statement here.  First, Barack Obama sounded like a ghetto-type man and a thug surrounded by a bunch of his street-gang associates.  Notice the words used, some of which I have presented in chopped off form, because that is how Barack Obama spoke them.  Second, Barack Obama thought it was all funny.  However, his policies of blocking the ability of companies to drill for oil in, for example, the Gulf of Mexico are adding to the cost of gasoline in the country, since the country has to import more oil than it should have to.  Third, I and a friend of mine heard the audio together for the first time, and we both looked at each other in astonishment while hearing it--Barack Obama sounded as if he was on drugs.  Find this statement on the Internet in audio form and listen to it!]

    Wednesday, April 6, 2011 (at the gala for the National Action Network in New York City, New York):
    "...I said that we were facing extraordinary challenges in this country, but that what was stopping us from solving them wasn't a lack of policies, it was a lack of plans, what was stopping us was a broken politics--a broken politics in Washington, a politics that was all about the next election instead of the next generation.  It was all about what we disagreed about instead of what we had in common.  The politics that made us cynical about our ability to change this country.  And I said that, if you stand with me and believe in what we can do together, if you do what civil-rights groups like the National Action Network have always done--if you put your shoulder to the wheel of history that we can move this country towards the promise of a better day.  I told you at the time I, I wasn't a perfect person, I wouldn't be a perfect President, but I could commit to is always telling you the truth, even when it was hard, and I would spend each and every day thinking about you...."  [The truth is the National Action Network is an entity headed up by a black radical--Reverend Al Sharpton, who pushes socialistic causes and crap.  So, Barack Obama went to speak to those who showed, one of whom was Earvin "Magic" Johnson, who had been a big-name professional basketball player years ago.  What else did Earvin "Magic" Johnson hear from Barack Obama at this gathering?   The other quoted material in this section will give you a general idea.  Incidentally, since Barack Obama is a black radical and communist and Earvin "Magic" Johnson was at the event, it must mean that Earvin "Magic" Johnson is a socialist or communist and supports what Barack Obama has done--and Barack Obama has done bad to the country.]
    "...And I want you to know, so long as there are Americans who can't find work, I will be fighting for jobs, and so long as the gap between the wealthiest few and everybody else keeps on growing, I will be fighting for opportunity, and I know you'll be right there along side with me.  We are gonna keep fighting till every family gets a shot at the 'America Dream.'  That's our North Star.  That's the first thing I think about when I wake up in the morning, that's the last thing I think about when I go to bed at night...."  [I wonder what Earvin "Magic" Johnson made of this set of words.  Most certainly, the piece that was "...till every family gets a shot at the 'American Dream'" was crap.  Everyone in the United States of America has the 'American Dream" open to them, but, in some cities, such as Detroit, where blacks have been told for at least three decades by other blacks to not learn English but to learn "black English" and to believe in and follow communistic leaders, such as John Conyers, blacks have been blocked from achieving the 'American Dream'--kept ignorant about life and the world.]
    "...What's also true is that, even before the recession hit, too many communities were marked with by structural inequalities in health and education and employment that made it profoundly difficult for too many people to get ahead.  You understood that.  I understood that.  That's part of the reason I ran for president, 'cause I've seen the frustration and the wounded pride in the eyes of folks who, who've lost their jobs or a father who has to go home and, and, and, and tell his kids that we might not have enough this month, we might be losing our apartment this month.  I've heard the stories of struggling families who are doing everything right and still at the end of the month don't quite have enough to pay the bills...."  [Barack Obama talked like a Marxist or "enslavist" here, pushing lies and doing pandering, using sets of words that no U.S. President has ever said, and I wonder if Earvin "Magic" Johnson thought about the words.]
    "...With the help of folks at the grassroots, we passed historic health-insurance reform that will not only extend coverage to thirty-million more Americans and give Americans more affordable choices but will narrow the cruel health disparities between African-Americans of different backgrounds...."  [I watched a video of the entire roughly twenty-two-minute speech on Thursday, April 7, 2011, and when I watched the video, I was not able to see the people in the audience.  Barack Obama did call out "Magic" by name.  I bet that most of the audience was black, as is Earvin "Magic" Johnson.  I wonder if Earvin "Magic" Johnson realized Barack Obama just lied to all his people--all the blacks in the audience--with this set of words.  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 will not only hurt whites but also it will hurt blacks.  Barack Obama just lied to the blacks, though earlier in the speech Barack Obama had said: "...but I could commit to is always telling you the truth, even when it was hard..."]
    "...That's why we ended a system where we were subsidizing banks in the student-loan program.  They were taking billions of dollars out of the student-loan program.  We said why don't we give that to the students directly.  That would make sense.  So we made college more affordable for millions of students.  Millions of students across the country are now getting student loans that they weren't gettin' before and more loans than they were getting before.  That's why we're making it easier to repay student loans, so kids don't graduate like Michelle and I did with massive loan payments each month.  It was more than our mortgage for ten years.  One of the things I try to remember, I, I, I try to remind people when they say your, your President now, you're out of touch.  I say, 'Listen, it was only a few years ago I was still paying off my student loan.  And it's true, I don't pump gas now, but I remember what it was like pumpin' gas....."  [Attached to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a the law that made the student-loan program a monopoly under the control of the federal government.  Now, the federal government can, if it wishes, approve or deny you higher education if you do not follow the political ways of the people in power at the time, and the federal government can determine, if it wishes, whether or not you can enter a certain field of study, and the federal government can even spend more and more money to supposedly educate people and then not require some people from paying the money back, which is another scheme to "spread the wealth" around, the way of communists and other evil people.  Yes, that is what really happened, Earvin "Magic" Johnson."]
    "...And if you're as committed as I am to continuing to change this country for the better, if you feel the same determination that I do to tackle the problems that we've haven't yet met, if you're still willing to believe in what we can do together, I am absolutely confident we will do what you've been doin' for the last twenty years.  We will build an America where the ideals of justice and equality and opportunity are alive and well and we will reclaim the 'American Dream' in our times...."  [And near the end the speech, Barack Obama said these words.  For twenty-years, the National Action Network has done crap, pushing socialism on the black community, and the National Action Network has helped kill the black community.  Look at Detroit!  Barack Obama has shown is hand in working to hurt the country and make it socialistic or communistic or a place where the people are enslaved--probably especially whites, given that Barack Obama has shown he is a racist--and Barack Obama really talked crap by saying: "...We will build an America where the ideals of justice and equality and opportunity are alive and well and we will reclaim the 'American Dream' in our times...."  What is Barack Obama going to "reclaim"? And Earvin "Magic" Johnson was, there, to hear it all.]

    Tuesday, April 12, 2011 (at the launch of Michelle Obama and Jill Biden's "Joining Forces" initiative to support and honor the military and military families):
    "...As part of a landmark presidential study directive, for the first time ever, the well being of our military families is now a national priority, not just a Defense Department priority, not just a VA priority, it is a federal-government priority.  Today, my administration is working to implement nearly fifty specific commitments to improve the lives of military families, everything from protecting families from financial scams to improving education for military kids and spouses to stepping up our fight to end homelessness among veterans....."  [What a collection of crap this is from Barack Obama.  For one, about five days previously, Barack Obama threatened to veto (or not sign) a short-term budget bill, and within the bill, though, was a funding provision that would have funded at least the military till the end fiscal year, which is September 30, 2011 (Taylor, Andrew.  "Obama threatens to veto GOP budget extension plan."  Bloomberg Business Week, 7 April 2011, 1:06 p.m. ET.). And there is more crap in his statement, such as that which shows Barack Obama is once again showing his disdain for business and this work to make you hate private business, since--as pushed by him indirectly--they are always doing those "financial scams" on people, but Barack Obama is here to save the day.  Really, "Joining Forces" is a PR campaign to make Barack Obama look good.]

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011 (presented a speech on Fiscal Policy at George Washington University, Washington, D.C.):
    "Thank you!  Thank you.  Thank you very much.  Thank you...."  [On this day, a man who defective people call "historic" gave a speech at George Washington University, and the man showed that he is the most horrific and evil man in American political history, if not the most evil man in American history, and I watched this evil man speak while watching the event live at the Web site for the White House.  While I watched the speech, the lies and misleading statements mounted in number till, to me, I was loathing the idea of having to make comments about the speech, realizing I could use up hours and hours of time explaining why the thoughts presented were, in essence, rotten and rubbish, and  watched this corrupt mind--this corrupt man--blather on, knowing full well this mind has purposely been attacking me (and well as all Americans) and this speech was more of the same crap.  Really, the speech could be summed up as Barack Obama's push to say that no real cuts in government can happen without hurting the economy of the country, that rich people get to much freebie stuff from the government, that the George W. Bush administration put the country in deep debt, et cetera (all the Marxist regular lies and falsehoods).  I only in this section talk about some of the crap that I could talk about.]
    "...Ah, it is wonderful to be back at G.W.  Ah, I want you to know that, dah, one of the reasons that I worked so hard with Democrats and Republicans to keep the government open was so that I could show up here today...."  [This statement is garbage.]
    "...Everybody pays, but the wealthier born a little more.  This is not because we begrudge those who have done well.  We rightly celebrate their success.  Instead, it's a basic reflection of our belief that those who've benefited most from our way of life can afford to give back a little bit more...."  [The speech showed Barack Obama's use of The Communist Manifesto, which pushes the radical person to pit most people--the so-called middle-class people and poor people--against those who might be defined as wealthy or rich, who is hard to define and, by the Marxist, is never defined clearly or at the same rate from day to day, and that push is done to pit most people against the so-called rich so that those most of the people will urge the pusher to hurt the so-called rich and become or remain their leaders (though what happens is the pusher becomes the so-called rich and the ruler).  Barack Obama is using class warfare--pitting people against other people--to allow him to become and stay the ruler by making people believe he is working for the middle-class people or the poor people, though he is really praying on the middle-class people and the poor people and using them for his own gains--and only his gains or those of very close associates.  And how does our way of life officially benefit some people more than others, as if our way of life only only allows a few to benefit and does not allow most to benefit--on purpose?  Really, Barack Obama was attacking as bad how it is possible for some people to make more than others do, though it comes about through such ways as work or through chance of life (such as by happening to be in the right place and time in history, such as to create a personal computer).]
    "...As a result of these bipartian efforts, America's finances were in great shape by the year 2000.  We went from deficit to surplus...."  [Liar!  The federal government had trillions in unfunded liabilities in 2000.  Since 2000, the total amount of unfunded liabilities has increased every year, and Barack Obama has added to the problems by not doing anything worthwhile about them.]
    "...We increased spending dramatically for two wars and an expensive prescription drug program, but we didn't pay for any of this new spending.  Instead, we made the problem worse with trillions of dollars of unpaid for tax cuts, taxes that went to every millionaire and billionaire in the country, tax cuts that will force us to borrow as average of five-hundred-billion dollars every year or the next decade...."  [The problem with this statement I address more in the paragraph that is coming up about "Tax Expenditures."  Here, I note that Barack Obama was referring to what are informally called the "Bush tax cuts" of the first decade of the twenty-first century, in which everyone in the a country was given a tax cut.  So, here, Barack Obama lied about those tax cuts.  Anyway, tax cut is not at a "paid" thing or "unpaid" thing!]
    "...To give you an idea of how much damage this caused to our nation's checkbook, consider this--In the last decade, if we had simply found a way to pay for the tax cuts and the prescription drug benefit, our deficit would currently be at low historical levels in the coming years...."  [Study his set of words.  It is a lie and does make sense.  Think about this idea--How can you find a way to pay for tax cuts and what is the way in which you "pay" for tax cuts?  Barack Obama spoke crap!]
    "...We have to live with our means.  We have to reduce our deficit.  And we have to get back on a path that will allow us to pay down our debt...."  [Barack Obama is the single most bigggest spender in America history, and yet Barack Obama said this.]
    "...Now ultimately all this rising debt will cost of jobs and damage our economy.  It will prevent us from making the investments we need to win the future.  We won't be able to afford good schools, new research, or the repair of roads, all the things that create new jobs and businesses...."[I only cover one of the problems presented in this quoted material.  How do repairs to roads create new jobs and businesses?  When businesses are able to grow and hire people--not restricted by government rules and regulations--community leaders discover roads have to be built or improved and the community leaders work get the roads built or improved, using, for example, money taken in in local property taxes.  You do not first build roads to create jobs, except to create jobs for road builders, which does not necessarily lead to jobs created by other businesses, if the roads are roads to nowhere or will not get used because the community does not grow.]
    "...We can solve this problem.  We came together as Democrats and Republicans to meet this problem before.  We can do it again.  But that starts by being honest about what's causing our deficit...."  [Barack Obama said this, but nowhere in the speech did Barack Obama honestly say what was "causing our deficit," which involves him.]
    "...Now, to their credit, ah, one vision has been presented and championed by Republicans in the House of Representatives and embraced by several of the party's presidential candidates.  It's a plan that aims to reduce our deficit by four-trillion dollars over the next ten years and one that addresses the challenge of Medicare and Medicaid in the years after that.  These are both worthy goals.  They're worthy goals for us to achieve.  But the way this plan achieves those goals would lead to a fundamentally different America than the one we've known--certainly in my lifetime.  In fact, I think it would be fundamentally different than what we've known throughout our history...."   [Liar!  Lair!  Liar!  Evidence and facts show that Barack Obama is working to fundamentally change the country from what it was founded as to something that has yet to be clearly defined, but it does looks as if his fundamental change involves a move to socialism and communism--and a dictatorship-like society.  By the way, Barack Obama was referring to U.S. Representatives Paul Ryan's proposed budget plan for the 2012 fiscal year for the federal government.]
    "...It's a vision that says up to fifty-milliion American have to lose their health insurance in order for us to reduce the deficit...."  [This is clearly a piece of crap from a man with a mind filled with crap, given it is clear that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which was championed by and signed into law by Barack Obama, is going to hurt health care in American and make health care more expensive!]
    "...We don't have to choose between a future of spiraling debt and one where we forfeit our investment in our people and our country.  To meet our fiscal challenge, we will need to make reforms.  We will all need to make sacrifices!...."  [Yes, the communist spoke this.  Why should I have to make a sacrifice, given that he--Barack Obama--is causing the crap that is hitting it me?  Barack Obama is the problem, he is the crap creator!  Do not give me this communist crap that I have to "sacrifice"!  Do not give me this communist crap that we "all need to make sacrifices" while he makes a new communistic or socialistic country.  Go suck on drywall, Barack Obama!]
    "...So, today, I'm proposing a more balanced approach to achieve four-trillion dollars in deficit reduction over twelve years...."  [Eh!]
    "...The second step is in our approach to find additional savings in our defense budget...."  [One reason the socialists and communists, like Barack Obama, in the federal government always work to find ways to cut the military budget is to make the U.S. less likely to fight back against communist leaders and socialist leaders of other countries, especially those who might attack us, and that is done because the socialists and communists, like Barack Obama, in our federal government believe in the tyrannical ways of socialists and communists of other countries--they are brothers in crap.]
    "...But we're gonna have to conduct a fundamental review of America's missions, capabilities, and our role in a changing world...."  [The theme here was the military.  What is the changing world in Barack Obama's mind?  Well, the Muslim Brotherhood--a radical Islamic group--is taking over Egypt, and it seems very like that radicals are going to take over Libya, and Iran has defective Islam leaders, and Turkey seems to be becoming more run by Islamic radicals everyday, and other country in northern Africa and the Middle East are a mess, and Barack Obama has already shown that he does not support Israel, and that means the radicals have two years in which to get Israel in a war and destroy it.  What will Barack Obama do if Israel--once an ally to the United States of America and now probably suspect of Barack Obama--gets drawn into a Middle East war, the intent of Israel's enemies is to finally wipe Israel off the map.  Meanwhile, countries in South America are becoming more radical; for example, the new president of Brazil, though a woman, was once a Marxist gorilla fighter.  Gangs and thugs from Mexico are threatening more and more the safety of Americans in the southwestern region of the United States of America, and Barack Obama is blocking the ability of Americans in the southwestern region to protect themselves--by, for instance, not really increasing the troops and such at the United States of America/Mexico border.  And that is only the beginning of Barack Obama's vision of the world it seems.].
    "...The third step in our approach is to further reduce health-care spending in our budget...."  [Oh.  How do you reduce health-care spending?  Think about that question.]
    "...Our approach lowers the government's health-care bills by reducing the cost of health care itself...."  [Oh.]
    "...We will change the way we pay for health care--not by the procedure or the number of days spent in the hospital but with new incentives for doctors and hospitals to prevent injuries and improve results....."  [This statement was one in which Barack Obama noted how the government will reduce the cost of health care, but it, like the others, was crap.  Ask yourself--How can a doctor "prevent injuries?"  Injuries happen in life, and doctors can do nothing to prevent injuries.  In Barack Obama's mind, does that mean, if a doctor does not prevent an injury, the doctor gets paid less?  Such crap the statement shows up in Barack Obama.]
    "...And we will slow the growth of Medicare cost by strengthening an independent commission of doctors, nurses, medical experts, and consumers who will look at all the evidence and recommend the best ways to reduce unnecessary spending while protecting access to the services that seniors need...."  [Barack Obama said in another way---adding "consumers" to the mix--what has been said by other persons--there will be panels to decide when you die or there will be "death panels" and more of your say so about when you die will be taken away from you.]
    "...But let me be absolutely clear--I will preserve these health-care programs as a promise we make to each other in this society...."  [This document shows piles of evidence that Barack Obama is a perpetual liar, and now you have this quoted material in your mind.  The quoted material should gag you.  The quoted material is another lie.]
    "...The fourth step in our approach is ta reduce spending in our tax code--so called, 'Tax Expenditures."  In December, I agreed to extend the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans because it was the only way I could prevent a tax hike on middle-class Americans.  But we cannot afford one-trillion-dollars worth of tax cuts for every millionaire and billionaire in our society.  We can't afford it!  And I refuse to renew them again...."  [I could spend hours showing why this is nonsense thought and why it is the result of the thinking process of an evil mind.  Consider this start--you live in a family where everybody makes money working, and then each day, you give up fifty percent of what you earn to the head of the family to pay for whatever the head of the family wishes, some of which may or may not benefit you, and then what happens is the head of the family decides to spend more than what was given to pay for whatever until the family in debt to others, and then, instead of cutting back on spending on the whatever, the head of the family asks for more from you and the others, asking, for example, for more of the fifty percent of the money that you are able to use for things related to you, and you give up some more money, maybe now totaling sixty percent of what you earn, but the head of the family continues to spend beyond what the head of the family takes in from you and the others, and then the head of the family comes back to you to say that you have to pay out seventy-five percent of what you earn to the head of the family, and the cycle continues on till each member of the family has no money to spend on the self, which is what a Barack Obama-type person is not averse to, because a Barack Obama-type person believes nothing that you make belongs to you, given that a Barack Obama-type person believes that everything you earn really belongs to the government, and what is not taken from you in taxes is really money owned by the government that the government--being kind and benelovent--is letting you use, and I say that that is all nonsense.  And then we come to Barack Obama's "Tax Expenditures."  "Tax Expenditures"--this set of words as presented to you by Barack Obama is what he would always defend as what government--owning everything--gives up to the people as the money that the people get to have for their personal use (but the money really belongs to him or the government).  The use of such a concept shows the user has an evil and defective mind, and the mind is trying to contend that money you have worked for by using the energy of your life and time that is a part of your life is really something the belongs to the government and the federal government has paid out to you as a citizen and a member of the whole community or the collective.  "Tax Expenditures"--this concept goes against the rules of nature and the ways of life and the United States of America, and it shows the evilness of the user--Barack Hussein Obama, quite an insane man.]
    "...And while I agree with the goals of many of these deductions, from hone, homeownership ta charitable giving, we can't ignore that fact that they provide millionaires as average tax break of seventy-five-thousand dollars but do nothing for the typical middle-class family that doesn't itemize.  So my budget calls for limiting itemized deductions for the wealthiest two percent of Americans, a reform that would reduce the deficit by three-hundred-and-twenty-billion dollars over ten years...."  [Look out, all homeowners!  Barack Obama has more crap in mind!  Look out, look out, the communist insane man is in the office of the U.S. President is not done!]
    "...But just to hold Washington and to hold me accountable and make sure that the debt burden continues to decline, my plan includes a debt 'Fail Safe.'  If by 2014, our debt is not projected to fall as a share of the economy, if we haven't hit our targets, if Congess has failed to act, then my plan will require us to come together and make up the additional savings with more spending cuts and more spending reductions in the tax code...."  [Did you hear the words "spending reductions in the tax code"?  What that means is Barack Obama--if he is still the U.S. President, which he hopes he will still be--will take back or reduce more of those "Tax Expenditures" or will increase taxes on people and businesses.  What are the odds that the "targets" will not be meant?]
    [Note: While I watched the presentation, the television director from time to time put up shots on the screen of the audience in the room in which Barack Obama spoke, and these politicians and reporters and whatever all looked dead and stupid.]

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 (in Washington, D.C., talking about "Deficit Commission" meeting):
    "...Yesterday, I laid out a plan to cut four-trillion dollars from our deficit.  It is a balanced plan that asks for shared sacrifice in order to provide shared opportunity for all Americans.  It is important that we put everything on the table.  These gentlemen, ah, share the view that we can't exempt anybody from these efforts, that it's not appropriate for us ta ask for sacrifices from everybody except for the two percent of the Americans who are doing best...." [Who has been asking for the "two percent" to whom Barack Obama referred to be exempt from anything?  For example, if he George W. Bush tax cuts of the first decade of this century are removed, everyone gets a tax increase.  If you study this text from Barack Obama, you can see he is actually showing that tax increases are coming for at least those who are not in that "two-percent" category.  In addition, I ask--How can anyone link "shared sacrifice" with "shared opportunity"?  The linking does not make sense.  Basically, Barack Obama spoke nonsense and presented confused thoughts and lied.]

    Thursday, April 14, 2011 (a fund-raiser for Barack Obama in Chicago, Illinois):
    "...And that's, ah, ah, you know, what the budget debate was all about--was can we transport issues, ah, that have very little to do with the budget and have everything to do with a particular agenda and we can use the budget as a way to chip away?  So, you know, they had a provision on repealing health care.  They had a provision on basically repealing the EPA.  They had a provision on, ah, you, you know, making sure, dah, that we didn't do anything, ahd, on climate change.  And I, I remember at one point in the negotiations, ah, one of Boehner's staff people pipes up and says--'You don't understand, Mr. President, you know, ah, we, we, we lost on, you know, ah, on health care.  We've lost on the EPA.  We've given that up.  We gotta have something for, ah, to, to sell to our caucus.'  And I said to them, I said--'Let me tell you something.  I spent a year and a half getting health care passed.  I had ta take that issue across the country, and I paid significant political costs to get it done.  The notion that I'm gonna let you guys undo that in a six-month spending bill.'  I said--'You wanna, you wanna repeal health care, go at it!  We'll have that debate!  You're not gonna be able to do that by nickel and diming me in the budget.  You think we're stupid?'  And, and that, dah, it, it, but that is gonna, we're gonna see this again, we're gonna see this on, on the debt-limit vote.  Eh, this is gonna be the strategy goin' forward, trying to do things that they can't do legislatively through un, under the guise of cutting spending.  I mean on health care, ah, cutting, cutting, ah, eliminating the health-care bill will cost us a trillion dollars.  It would add a trillion dollars to the deficit.  So wh, when Paul Ryan says his priority is to make sure that we're, you know, ah, he's just being America's accountant and you know tryin' ta, you know, be responsible.  This, this is the same guy who voted two wars that were unpaid for, voted for the Bush tax cuts there were unpaid for, voted for, ah, the Prescription Drug Bill that costs as much as my health-care bill but wasn't paid for...."  [On April 14, 2011, Barack Obama was in Chicago, Illinois, and Barack Obama talked with reporters at one point, and then most of the reporters left, but a CBS News reporter--Mark Knoller--ended up getting audio of Barack Obama talking while Barack Obama believed he was not being recorded and while he was talking with some of those who had showed up for the event, and the quoted material in this section was that which I was able to get by listening to The Mark Levin Show (a nationally syndicated radio show) on Friday, April 5, 2011, a day on which other radio talk-show hosts aired a shorter version of what Mark Levin played, and now I show up some of the lies presented by Barack Obama.  By the way, Barack Obama referred to the short-term budget proposal related to the 2011 fiscal year for the federal budget.  First, all issues have to do with the budget when the issues involve spending.  Second, Barack Obama's Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 had everything to do with changing the health-care system of the country into a completely government-controlled health-care system (a government monopoly)--it was a political agenda--and the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 spends more money not less money.  Third, there was no provision to completely repeal health care, but there was a provision to cut spending money that had been earmarked--unethically if not illegally--to implement provisions of the Patient Provision and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the act contained an automatic spending provision, when the act should have had no automatic spending contained within it, which would have been in keeping with tradition for a bill/act that establishes a program).  Fourth, there was no provision to eliminate the EPA, but there was a provision to block the EPA for instituting cap-and-trade rules without supervision of the U.S. Congress (if the EPA pushes through cap-and-trade rules, it can control the industry of the country).  Fifth, I ask--What political costs did Barack Obama take?  Sixth, Barack Obama said that he went around the country to sell the health-care bill to the public, but, as some of my documents on the Internet show, Barack Obama lied about the provisions and the meaning and what would be the ultimate results of health-care bills that were proposed.  Seventh, the idea of killing spending on something through a budget bill is doing something "legislatively," and it is a legal way of doing business for the U.S. Congress.  Eighth, killing or repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act of 2010 act would not cost "us" a "trillion dollars."  Ninth, tax cuts are not something that are paid for or not paid for, and you are urged to see the "Tax Expenditures" paragraph--at least--in the entry for April 13, 2011.  Yes, once again--even when talking off the record--Barack Obama lied and spoke crap.]

    Tuesday, April 19, 2011 (at the Annandale Campus of Northern Virginia Community College, Annandale, Virginia):
    "...I'll tell you what I'm not gonna do.  We're not gonna reduce the deficit by sacrificing investments in our infrastructure.  We're not gonna allow our roads and our bridges to grow more and more congested while places like China are building new roads and new airports, thousands of mile of high-speed rail...."  [Well, let me have a little fun with a defective man's thoughts.  Barack Obama said: "...We're not gonna allow our roads and our bridges to grow more and more congested..."  I guess that is why Barack Obama is working to get rid of cars that use gas so that there will be fewer and fewer cars on the roads and less congestion.]
    "...What would happen under this proposal is you'd get a set amount of money.  You could then go out on the private marketplace and buy insurance, but if the voucher that you were gettin' was for six- or seven-thousand dollars and the insurance company said it's gonna cost ya twelve-thousand dollars, well, you're gonna have to make up that difference. So, you're health-care costs keep on goin' up and up and up, the voucher doesn't, each year more and more costs comin' out of pocket.  Now, I think that is the wrong way to go.  That would fundamentally change Medicare as we know it, and I'm not, I'm not gonna sign up for that...."  [Oh, Barack Obama has already fundamentally changed Medicare, since "Obamacare" kills $500 billion in funding for Medicare.]
    "...We're not quit to we've found every single dime of waste and misspent money.  We don't have enough money to waste it right now.  I promise you that.  We're gonna check under the cushions.  You name it!...."  [I jest I say, "Yes, Barack Obama is going to look--in his zeal to tax you out of all that wasted "tax expenditures"--under your cushions, and he will be take all the old popcorn and paper clips, too."]
    "...This is probably my most-important message today.  I'm gonna need your help.  I can't afford to have all of ya as bystanders in this debate.  I want everybody to be in the game.  I want you to hold me accountable.  I want you to hold all of Washington accountable...."  [What was Barack Obama asking for?  At the very least, Barack Obama might have been hoping to get those in the audience to push his nonsense.  But how does Barack Obama's audience hold him accountable?  It seems his most-important message was vague.]
    "...There are powerful lobbyists and special interests in Washington, and they're gonna wanna reduce the deficit on your backs, and if you are not heard, that's exactly what's gonna happen...."  [Barack Obama's deficits of the past two years--an incredible increase in the nation's debt--is on the backs of all already, and Barack Obama is not done spending, given his proposed budget for the federal government for the 2012 fiscal year is estimated to be one-point-six-trillion dollars, and Barack Obama has already hinted that he is going to raise taxes on all the citizens of this country in various ways.]
   "...If you're drivin' out of necessity fifty miles a day to work, and you can't afford to buy some fancy new hybrid car so you're stuck with the old beater that is gettin' you eight miles a gallon, that's pretty frustrating.   Now, I wish I could tell you that there was some easy simply solution to this.  Now, one solution is making sure we're increasing production of U.S. oil, and we have actually continually increased U.S. production, so U.S. production is as high as it's ever been.  The problem is we only have about two to three percent of the world's oil reserves, and we use twenty-five percent of the world's oil, so when you say we should be using traditional sources, the problem is we've got finite sources when it comes to oil, and that means we've get to find some replacements...."  [And this statement is all crap, filled with lies and misinformation and nonsense.  Oh, what U.S. President of the past has ever put together such set of words as "...If you're drivin' out of necessity fifty miles a day to work, and you can't afford to buy some fancy new hybrid car so you're stuck with the old beater that is gettin' you eight miles a gallon...." for an audience?  That statement was the talk of a ghetto-man, right down to the incomplete pronunciation of words, which, I know, was purposely done by Barack Obama to make him seem more like his audience--sloppy speaking students at a community college, who are used to using slang and sloppy sentences.  By the way, Barack Obama, some of those "old beaters" can be very reliable, having fewer parts that can break down than the new cars of today have and offering mileage well above twenty miles a gallon, and maybe the owners of those "old beaters" like them very much and you have just insulted their "babies."]
    "...If we keep on spending more than we take in, it's gonna cause serious damage to our economy...."  [I say in jest or maybe not, "Barack Obama can say to himself, 'I cannot stop spending or I cannot reduce spending, so I have to take in more taxes for you.'"]
    "...And we've also got to end tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans....."  [There was material tied to this statement that I could have presented here, but I decided that I shall end my analysis of Barack Obama's speech from Barack Obama with my talking about only this statement.  Barack Obama said that "...we've also got to end tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans...."?  Who are the wealthiest Americans in the mind of Barack Obama?  Lately, they have been defined by "enslavists"--like Barack Obama--as those who make $250,000 in gross pay--not $250,000 in net pay--a year, and that hits people who run small businesses, such as stand-alone muffler shops, or businesses that are bigger than what are called small businesses.  I say in jest with a bit of truth of what Barack Obama would, it seems, like to do: "Yes, we just can't let any of those wealthiest Americans have any tax cuts!"]
    [Note: Barack Obama did not mention in the speech the significance of Standard & Poor's announcement of the previous day that noted that the entity has downgraded the outlook of the long-term financial health of the federal government from "stable" to "negative," meaning it is possible that, within the next two years, the entity could take away the good rating related to paying off obligations that the federal government has and has had for many years, and that is not a good thing and that is a warning, and that announcement from Standard & Poor's is a warning that should be taken seriously by everyone in the country, and the announcement from Standard & Poor's shows that it is displeased with the fiscal policies of the Barack Obama administration.]

    Tuesday, April 19, 2011 (at an Easter prayer breakfast):
    "...I wanted to host this breakfast for a simple reason, because as busy as we are, as many tasks as pile up during this season, ah, we are reminded that there are something about the Resurrection, something about the resurrection of our savior Jesus Christ that puts everything else in perspective...."  [What the heck is this?]

    Wednesday, April 20, 2011 (a Facebook Town Hall meeting):
    "...The Republican budget that was put forward I would say is fairly radical.  I wouldn't call it particularly courageous.  Ah, I do think Mr. Ryan is sincere.  Ah, I think he's a patriot.  I think he wa, he wants to solve a real problem with this long-term deficit, but I think that what he and the other Republicans in the House of Representatives also want to do is change our social compact in a pretty fundamental way...."  ["Altruism"--this word is defined by, for example, The Random House Dictionary (August 1990) as "unselfish concern for the welfare of others."  I have heard it said for years that socialists and communists are concerned with the welfare of the poor and such, but history shows that countries with socialists or communists as leaders have citizens that are oppressed and the leaders af in no way "altruistic," and, in fact, some countries based on communism or socialism have truly the poorest people of the world, and it is proof that socialism and communism are not compatible with "altruism."  I can prove that Barack Obama is a thug, a liar, a communist, and a supporter of "enslavism."  An "enslavist" is not "altruistic."  If you want to find a "altruistic" person, you have to find, for example, a "conservative," who upholds the ways of The United States Constitution, which is a document that was designed to block "enslavists" or non-altruistic persons from enslaving the citizens of this country.  By the way, Barack Obama has publicly stated that he feels The United States Constitutionis flawed.  A "conservative" is not a "radical."  Notice how Barack Obama used the word "radical" in his statement, though Barack Obama, who is not a "conservative," is and can be defined as a radical.  And then I come to Barack Obama's use of "social compact in a pretty fundamental way."  Remember: Barack Obama has said publicly that he--he--wants to change the country "fundamentally."  To date, Barack Obama has made fundamental changes to the United States of America, such as by giving the country the seeds of a communistic-type health-care system through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.  Barack Obama is not looking out for you or looking out for your welfare and life--alatruism does not exist in Barack Obama.  Oh, you should wonder--What is Barack Obama's "social compact" and what does "social compact" mean to a radical or a communist or a socialist?]
    "...But we don't have ta radically change Medicare.  So, yes, I think it's fair to say that, ah, their vision is radical.  No, I don't think it's particularly courageous...."   [Who is Barack Obama to say "I think it is fair to say," given he is a liar?  Anyway, what is "fair" to Barack Obama, a radical?  Who is he to determine what is "fair"?]
     "..But the last point I'll make is this--Nothing is easier than solving a problem on the backs of people who are poor or people who are powerless or don't have lobbyists or don't have clout...."  [This set of words was said right after the set f words that is presented in the previous paragraph.  Barack Obama--this radical--has been instrumental in having the federal government spend so much money between January 20, 2009, and this date that there is already heavy debt on the backs of citizens yet to be born--all types of citizens yet to be born.  Barack Obama's statement that is looked at in this paragraph was directed at the "Republicans," but it does not fit the "Republicans"--it fits Barack Obama, a radical.  Incidentally, Barack Obama's statement was, of course, a lie.]
    "...No matter how successful I am, no matter how much I've taken from this country, I wasn't born wealthy.  I was raised by a single mom and my grandparents.  I went to college on scholarships.  There was time when my mom was tryin' to get a Ph.D. where for a short time, she had to take food stamps.  My grandparents relied on Medicare and Social Security.  Their notion is--despite the fact that I've benefited from all these investments, somehow I now have no obligation to people who are less fortune than me...."  [Okay, get ready for what others will not say.  Barack Obama's mother was as socialist and a "radical."  Sometimes, good people who are trying to get a Ph.D. have to take a hiatus from trying to get a Ph.D. because of money problems, and they do not take food stamps.  Yet, Barack Obama's mother's while going after a higher-education degree took food stamps and kept working for her Ph.D. (at least as Barack Obama has told the story).  It shows more of what Barack Obama's mother was--a leech on society.  And then you have to think about this set of Barack Obama's words--"...no matter how much I've taken from the country...."  Yes, Barack Obama, like his mother, took from the country, and now that Barack Obama is the U.S. President, he is taking more and having a good time, such as by regularly having parties at the White House, and, yes, Barack Obama, like his mother, is crap.  (Note: If my topic for this section were changed, I could discuss why Medicare ad Social Security are not "investments," and I might also talk about how Barack Obama thinks that Barack Obama's mother's taking food stamps was an "investment.")]
    "...It's, it's a good question, and I'll be honest with you, this is probably the biggest drag on the economy, right now.  The challenge we still have--as your question properly points out--is that, a lot of people who bought a first home when credit was easy, now are finding that credit is tough.  And we've got to strike a balance.  Frankly, there's some folks who are probably better off renting...."  [This statement was made in relation to a question about what Barack Obama could do about helping the housing market so that people can get their first home easier, and, basically, Barack Obama told the person who had asked the question to rent and to not try to buy a house.]

    Thursday, April 21, 2011 (in Reno, Nevada):
    "...Last month, I asked my Attorney General ta look into any cases of price gouging, so we can make sure nobody's bein' taken advantage at the pump.  Today, I'm gonna go a step further.  The Attorney General is putting together a team whose job it is ta root out any cases of fraud or manipulation in the oil markets that might affect gas prices, and that includes the role of traders and speculators...."  [Since the 1970s, at least, the Democrats have tried to find price gouging done by the oil companies, who, when they are private companies are enemies of communists and such, like Barack Obama, who want to own and control those entities so that they have control over all the citizens, and no big incidents have been found and then have been reported as stories by the "liberal" press, but since the 1970s, I have heard of one case or two cases in which a single gas station operator seemed to be doing price gouging, and I have always said "So what?" to that, given consumers can simply not buy from such a guy.  I say in jest, "But now Barack Obama is going to tackle the problem and find those gougers to save you from those bad people, if it takes all the energy he has."  Such crap Barack Obama spoke and pushed forth on his audience members, giving the impression he is fighting for them and he is going to protect them like their daddy, which might persuade them to vote for him in the next election.]
    "...I say that not because I wanna punish success.  I'm, I, I'm rooting for everybody to get rich.  But I believe we can't ask everybody to sacrific and then tell the wealthiest among us--'Well, you can just relax and can go count your money and don't worry about it.  We're, we're not gonna ask anything of you.'...."  ["Mr. Magoo" was a really popular cartoon series on television in the 1960s, and Mr Magoo was highly nearsighted and rich, and, yes, Mr. Magoo was busy doing things other than working--he was doing the typical rich-guy thing, lounging around and playing golf and playing tennis and going to football games, and that is the way of the rich guy, and, yes, that is a fact of life in the cartoon world.]

    Wednesday, April 27, 2011 (a statement about his birth):
    "...Ah, as many of you've been briefed, ah, we provided additional information today about, ah, the site of my birth.  Now, this issue has been goin' on for two, two-and-a-half years, now.  I think it started during the campaign...."  [Yawn!]
    "...We've posted the, ahhhhhhhhhhhh, certification that is given by the state of Hawaii on the Internet...."  [So?]
    "...And when I gave a speech about my budget and how I felt that we needed to invest in education and infrastructure and, ah, making sure that we had a strong safety net for our seniors, ah, even as we were closing the deficit...."  [Crap!]
    "...And I'm confident that the American people and America's political leaders can come together in a bipartisan way and solve these problems.  We already have!  But we're not gonna be able to do it if we are distracted.  We're not gonna be able to do it if we spend time vilifying each other.  We're not gonna be able to do it if we just make stuff up and pretend that facts are not facts...."  [As this document shows, Barack Obama discount facts and avoid facts and hides facts and does not listen to facts, and yet Barack Obama made this statement.]

    Thursday, April 28, 2011 (Barack Obama visited Alabama):
    "...We're going to do everything we can to help these communities rebuild...."  [Barack Obama visited areas of the southern United States of America where there had recently been a lot of tornados, and Barack Obama made comments, and here is one statement that you should keep in mind.]

    Sunday, May 1, 2011 (a statement about the death of Osama bin Laden from the White House):
    "Good evening.  Tonight, I can report to the American people and the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children...."   [On Sunday, May 1, 2011, in around the start of ten o'clock hour in the evening, it was announced by the White House that Barack Obama was going to make an important public statement at 10:30 p.m.   Some news networks and television networks broken into programming, especially very late in the ten o'clock hour, and Barack Obama finally showed up at about 11:35 p.m., making it another speaking event at which Barack Obama arrived late.  It was basically a lifeless speech, and it was another speech in which he read from a teleprompter.  And although Barack Obama used a teleprompter, Barack Obama uncharactistically--while using a teleprompter--made a number of speaking flubs--"...to protect our nation and ta preding--and bring...." and "...so 'is demise should be...." and "...I know that it has at times sprayed....".]
    [Note: Over the period from May 1, 2011, to at least May 6, 2011, a lot of conflicting information about the finding and killing of Osama bin Laden was passed along to the public from the Barack Obama administration, politicians, and reporters, and it was unknown to the public what really happened, and I feel as if I will never know a good true story about the events, especially since Barack Obama is a perpetual liar.  I note, here, that, in essence, the federal government was working to get Osama bin Laden fro 2001, the year of the attack on, for one, the World Trade Center, and May 1, 2011, and U.S. President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2009 and Barack Obama from 2009 to May 6, 2011, had a lot of time to think about what to do if Osama bin Laden was found and could be gotten to--either captured or killed.  It was publicly reported during the week of Sunday, May 1, 2011, that Barack Obama had taken sixteen hours to think over the final decision to get Osama bin Laden ("Obama took SIXTEEN HOURS to make up his mind about Bin Laden mission."  MailOnline (of The Daily Mail in the United Kingdom), 3 May 2011, 7:20 p.m.).  I ask myself--In relation to the sixteen hours, why did Barack Obama have to use sixteen hours to make a final decision?  If I were a U.S. President and if I would have had the problem of deciding  whether or not to "go," I would have not had to spend sixteen hours to make a final decision, having had weeks and weeks and months and months to deliberate about such a time.  It makes me think Barack Obama was hoping Osama bin Laden would get away before the attack would take place or Barack Obama has a hard time dealing with the idea that he must possibly "take down" a man who hates the United States, as he does.]

    Friday, May 6, 2011 (at Allison Transmission in Indianapolis, Indiana):
    "...In fact, last year, American oil production reached its highest level since 2003, so I want everybody to remember that, if people ask--'cause sometimes I get letters from constituents who say--Why aren't we just drillin' more here?--we're actually producing more oil here then ever, but the challenge is we've only got about two to three percent of the world's oil reserves and we use twenty-five percent of the world's oil...."  [Barack Obama was on the road again--spreading his crap--misleading information--about oil.]

    Sunday, May 8, 2011 (yet another appearance on 60 Minutes):
    "...Had he [Osama bin Laden] not be there, then there would have been some significant consequences...."  [I only present one sentence of the interview, only wishing to note that Barack Obama was once again on television, particularly once again on 60 Minutes.]

    Tuesday, May 10, 2011 (in El Paso, Texas):
    "...we have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible.  They wanted more agents at the border.  Well, we now have more boots on the ground on the southwest border than at any time in our history.  The border patrol has two, ah, ah, has twenty-thousand agents.  The border patrol has twenty-thousand agents, more than twice as many as there were in 2004.  It's a built up that began under President Bush and that we've continued.  And I had a chance to meet some of these outstanding agents and actually saw of them on horseback, who looked pretty tough.  So, we put the, we put the agents here.  Then they wanted a fence.  Well, the fence is, the fence is now basically complete...."  [Wrong!  The fence was supposed to be a double-layer-type fence (like two rows of fence), and it is not.  Only about thirty-six miles of the thing exists as a double-layer fence, and since Barack Obama became the U.S. President, only about four miles of that thirty-six miles can be attributed to his watch--that information about the fence is from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.  Again, Barack Obama-the propagandist--lied.  ("Obama Claims Border Fence 'Basically Complete' But It's Only 5% Finished." Fox Nation, 10 May 2011; DeMint, Jim (U.S. Senator related to North Carolina).  "Speeches and Summits Won't Secure the Border." National Review Online, 10 May 2011, 4:36 p.m.)]
    "...So, so here's the point--I, I want everybody to listen carefully to this--we have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement.  All the stuff they asked for, we've done!  But even though we've answered these concerns, I've got to say I, I suspect there's still gonna be some who are tryin' to move the goal posts on us one more time.  You know, they said we needed to triple the border patrol.  Or now they're gonna say we need to quadruple the border patrol.  Or they'll want a higher fence.   Maybe, they'll need a moat.  Maybe, they'll want alligators in the moat.  They'll never be satisfied...."  [Barack Obama lied about--at least--the fence, and, here, Barack Obama mocked the Republicans or worked to put down the Republicans.]
    "...One way to strength the middle class in America is to reform the immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody else.  I want incomes for middle-class families to rise again.  I want prosperity in this country to be widely shared.  I want everybody to be able ta to reach that American dream, and that's why immigration reform is an economic imperative...."  [There is a big logic problem with this statement.  How does giving citizenship to illegal aliens, which is what Barack Obama wants to do, improve the economy?  Once the illegals get citizenship, other illegals just keep coming across the border.]
    [Note: Around this time, people in the middle part of the country were dealing with flooding from, for one, the Mississippi River, but Barack Obama felt it was more important to push his defective wishes for immigration reform in a speech and not spend time going to places where flooding was a big concern and talking about the flooding, but that is the way of Barack Obama, who, in the past, showed no concern for people dealing with flooding, such as in western Tennessee.]

    Thursday, May 12, 2011 (a "Town Hall" meeting for about an hour on The Early Show):
    "...So, so part of what's happened also is some structural changes in the economy, where it used to be that there was broad-based shared prosperity...."  [Again, Barack Obama was on CBS-TV, and he would be again on the forthcoming Sunday (on Fact the Nation), when it seems portions of this total event would get broadcast, and on this Thursday, May 12,  2011, Barack Obama answered, in essence, only six questions from viewers or the audience (in fact, he answered five questions from the studio audience and one from an Internet person), and he went on an on with clichés and lies and misinformation, and, of course, he ran off Marxist themes.  What the heck is "broad-based shared prosperity"?  What does "broad-based shared prosperity" mean?  I say that it is nonsense, and it is tied to Barack Obama's "shared sacrifice" theme, which he regularly promotes in speeches, and by using the set of words, Barack Obama was trying to push the idea that in the past--whenever that was--everybody was sharing in prosperity in the country and now not everyone is.  Now, I can say that Barack Obama used the set of words in his overall tactic to put the blame on reduced jobs in the country on businesses--not any government policies tied to Barack Obama--and on what the Republicans had supposedly allow businesses to get away with more and more under the U.S. President George W. Bush administration.  Barack Obama passed along crap!]
    "...But frankly the most important thing we can do is have a long-term energy policy.  So let me give you one example.  We increased our fuel-efficiency standards on cars, ah, for the first time in thirty years.  We just did it administratively last year.  That's gonna save us one-point-eight-billion barrels of oil.  And it's gonna save the average consumer about three-thousand dollars during the life of your car if and when you guys buy a new car.  It's just gonna have better gas mileage...."  [One of the things that you should see in this set of words is the prediction of "three-thousand dollars during the life of your car."  Barack Obama cannot prove that figure, but Barack Obama used it to make a person feel good--in that Barack Obama is doing something for the person, saving the person three-thousand dollars.  It is nothing more than an unfounded prediction, given that so many variables in the world can change over the life of a vehicle.  What is the life of a vehicle?  I know some people who keep vehicles for ten years or fifteen years and such.  If you keep a vehicle for ten years and if you use Barack Obama's $3,000, then you save $300 a year.  Barack Obama pushed nothing more than a feel-good moment here]
    "...I think the challenge has been that, ah, in some of these negotiations to try to reduce the deficit--I think the feeling, ah, particularly on the part of, ah, some folks on the other side of the aisle has been that we want to just cut and cut and cut, ah, and that somehow is going to create economic growth...."  [I say that cutting government spending does such things as reduce government debt and puts more money in the hands of consumers and businesses, and that can lead to increased growth in the economy--unless government regulations are also blocking the creation of jobs, which happens when socialistic or communist economic policies--like those of Barack Obama--are followed.]
    "...The reason that unemployment rate is still as high as it is in part is because there have been huge layoffs of government workers at the federal level, at the state level, at the local level.  Teachers, police officers, firefighters, social workers--they have really taken it, ah, in the chin over the last several months...."  [Liar!  And, basically, local governments and state governments that have reduced the number of employees is tied to their being overstaffed in relation to the money that they had available.  Oh, has the federal government gotten smaller lately?]
    "...In fact, most of the government services that people get are ones they really like--Social Security, Veterans Affairs, our military...."  [I have nothing to say about this, but I want you to see how it links to what else he said on this day, something that is presented five paragraphs down]
    "...Ah, and I think the key is to recognize that some of the jobs that left aren't gonna be comin' back, but we got to be creating new industries and new jobs...."  [Since the 1700s, individuals--through work and imagination--have created new things for the world, and the creation of those new things have led to new jobs for people in the country.  Government cannot order that new things be created, cannot order that new industries be created, and cannot even predict what and when new things and industries will be created.  What "new industries and new jobs" did Barack Obama have in mind when he made the statement?  Barack Obama knows not what "new" will be created and when it will be created!  Maybe, nothing really new--like the typewriter or the television or the computer--will be created for some decades to come.  A country should not give up on certain industries and let them be done in other countries only, especially since it is not known what will show up in the future, if anything.  Barack Obama simply was running off the mouth here about something he has no control over and you have no control over, unless you actual work to create something new that can lead to a new industry (and you might fail).]
    "...When I talk to CEOs, ah, the issue here is not uncertainty.  And the issue here they got to start placing their bets on America.  Ah, it is time for companies to step up.  Ah, when we were in the middle of a recession, our whole job was to make sure the economy was still growing and we stabilized the financial system.  And we did that!  And American taxpayers contributed to that process of stabilizing the economies.  Businesses have benefited from that, and they're makin' a lot of money, ah, and now's the time for them to start betting on American workers and American products...."  [Here, Barack Obama showed he really is a piece of crap--here, Barack Obama scolded and attacked businesses for not stepping up and offering people jobs.  Well, businesses only create jobs when there is a need to, such as when customers clamor for more products or services form the businesses.  Barack Obama--over the past two years or so--has enacted government policies or helped to, which are anti-business, and they are hindering businesses from being able to create more jobs or wishing to.  Yes, here, Barack Obama worked to make businesses the enemies in the minds of people watching him or listening to him, but it is he who is the enemy of the United States of America.  By the way, you are urged to see T.H.A.T. #85, which gives some evidence of what Harry Alford--the head of the National Black Chamber of Commerce and a member of the board of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce--thinks of Barack Obama, which is not something good, and that document can be reached by using this link: T.H.A.T. #85.]
    "...But the bigger point is, if we were there for you when you got into trouble, then you got to be there for the American people when they're havin' a tough time, and that's why in addition to the short-term long modifications, we wanna see if we can get longer-term loan modifications, ah, and in some cases principle reduction, which will be good for the, ah, the person who owns, owns the home but it will also be good for the banks in the long term...."  ["Principle reduction"--this is big trouble from Barack Obama and the federal government.  If you buy a house over a contracted period of time, you buy it for an amount (the "principle") and an interest fee, and when you sell the house, you receive a payment, which the buyer gives you, and that payment is probably money taken out as a loan from a financial institution of some type.  If Barack Obama or the federal government  reduces the "principle" amount in a contract, he or it is screwing around with lives and the values of property and taking way values from people to give to others, the latter of whom happen to be people who contracted as buyers to buy houses at stated prices, and when Barack Obama or the federal government reduces the "principle" of something, the financial institution who can be called the owner of that "principle" loses values or money, and when financial institutions lose money in such ways, they have to cut jobs, and when Barack Obama or the federal government reduces the "principle" amounts of properties, it adversely affects the values of all houses in the marketplace and screws up the marketplace.  Also, when Barack Obama or the federal government gets involved in determining the amounts of "principle," he or it is setting prices, and when Barack Obama or the federal government begins to set the price of one product--setting a precedent--he or it will very likely begin to set the prices and values of other products, and that should never happen in a free country or this country.  The federal government should not determine the price of any product!  Oh, incidentally, what if the federal government starts setting the rules for "principle" on houses and what if you own a house and want to sell it, could not the federal government tell you how much you can charge for it?]
    "...We can't keep on living beyond our means, and our government has to make sure that is, ah, only spending what it's also taking in...."  [Here, Barack Obama gave one of his flap-doodle statements, which actually is tied to the idea of not spending less but taxing more, but that is the way of a man who believes the government owns everything in the country.]
    "...What we've said is--let's look at all the spending we're doin' and making sure we're doin' it, ah, we're, we're doin' what we should be doin' and stop doin' things that aren't benefiting the American people.  And we think we can identify two-trillion dollars worth of cuts in spending, including defense spending, ah, which, has grown very, very rapidly over the last decade...."  [I say in jest, "Yes, we like having the military, which Barack Obama talked about, so let us cut spending for the military first."]
    "...I've also said is--Let's get a trillion dollars in revenue from those of us who can afford to pay a little bit more, because I think the concept of 'shared sacrifice' is something that most Americans believe in...."  [This is big crap from crap-head Barack Obama.  Since the 1960s, I have watched the communists and Marxists and black radicals kill Detroit, which is now a dead city, and I owe Detroit nothing, and I do not accept that I must be a part of the "shared sacrifice" for related to other defective people, as I would not take part in the "shared sacrifice" of a neighbor guy who lives down the street and has purposely screwed up his life by not doing anything and by thinking the government should provide him stuff as some sort of "right."  Barack Obama has put the country in deeper debt--proposely--and I say that it has been done purposely to kill the country and hurt millions of persons, so I say to Barack Obama--"Barack, baby, stick your 'shared sacrifice' up your butt!"]
    "...Now, the health-care reform act that I passed last year started on the road of reducing health-care costs, and, in fact, it's estimated that we'll save about a trillion dollars once we implement that plan fully...."  [The big liar pushed crap again, since it has been shown publicly that the health-care act in causing medical-care costs to rise.]
    "...What the Republican proposal is is to basically just say--we're only going to pay this much, we're gonna create a voucher system for Medicare, here's the amount of money you get, and then if health-care costs keep on goin' up, that's your problem.  And it's estimated that that's gonna cause an additional six-thousand dollars for the average Medicare beneficiary--six-thousand dollars per person...."  [It is publicly known that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was put together by Barack Obama and the Democrats in the U.S. Congress by taking half the budget away from Medicare (about 500-billon dollars), and I wonder--What does that $6,000 mean?  Is it $6,000 over a year or two years or ten years or twenty years?  Who determined that $6,000?  What the crap was Barack Obama talking about?]

    Tuesday, May 17, 2011 (Booker T. Washington High School):
    "...We live in a new world now...."  [Through this quote, I simple note that Barack Obama was out making another speech--which seems to be his main function in life--this time, a commensment address.]

    Thursday, May 19, 2011 (at the State Department):
    "...So while the core issues of the conflict must be negotiated, the basis of those negotiations is clear--a viable Paalis, Palestine, a secure Israel.  The United States believes that negotiations should result in two states with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine.  We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.  The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves and reach their full potential in a sovereign and contiguous state...."  [On this day, the Prime Minister of Israel--Benjamin Netanyahu--was heading to the United States of America to take part in meetings, such as with Barack Obama, and with other persons the next day, and Barack Obama made a speech, which contained this quoted material, that, in essence, was done to put pressure on Israel to give up land to enemies of Israel, and the speech did not go over well with Benjamin Netanyahu, and Benjamin Netanyahu would say publicly on Friday, May 20, 2011 said: "...We cannot go back to the 1967 lines, because these, these lines are indefensible, because they don't take into account, ah, certain changes that have taken place on the ground, demographic changes that have taken place over the last forty-four years.  Remember that, before 1967, Israel was all of nine-miles wide--half the width of the Washington beltway, ah, and these were not the boundaries of peace, they were the boundaries of repeated wars because the attack on Israel was so attractive....", and it looked as if Barack Obama was not pleased by the statement made by Benjamin Netanyahu]
    "...Failure to speak to the broader aspirations of ordinary people will only feed the suspicion that has fester for years that the United States pursues our interests at their expense.  Given that this mistrust runs both ways--Americans have been seared by hostage taking and violent rhetoric and terrorist attacks that have killed thousands of our citizens--a failure to change our approach threatens a deepening spiral of division between the United States and the Arab world, and that's way two years ago in Cairo, we began to broaden our engagement based upon mutual interests and mutual respect...."  [This set of words is the last set that I will present from the speech--a speech that was designed to undercut Israel--in this document, but besides undercutting Israel, the speech put down the United States of America.  A country pursues interests that are in the best interest of it.  Here, Barack Obama showed that he believes the United States of America has always worked in ways that were at the expense of other nations, and I say that that is more crap from Barack Obama and shows Barack Obama thinks the United States of America is a bad country.  Over the decades, the United States of America has helped many countries in the world, such as in times when those countries were under attack from bad people or when bad weather hit.  Of course, the United States of America has hurt countries that has attacked it.  Also, it sounds to me as if Barack Obama thinks we are the villains and we now have to compromise--"change our approach" and give in to bad people--and give up something, or it looks to me as if Barack Obama was pushing the idea that--Yes, America is going to have to change and will change (because I am going to change it).  "Mutual respect"--this term bothers me.  A man does not deserve "respect" unless the man earns it, and a country does not deserve "respect" unless it earns it, and "respect" is given in relation to being, for example, good or honorable.  What does "mutual respect" mean to Barack Obama?  Barack Obama is an "enslavist" and supports people who are "enslavists," such as the leaders of Iran and the leaders of Cuba, so if Barack Obama mentions "mutual respect," it must mean he respects enslavists for what they are and they can respect him for his being like them.  I wonder--Does the Benjamin Netanyahu/Barack Obama relationship fit in that "mutual respect" idea?]

    Friday, May 20, 2011 (in Washington, D.C.)
    "...Obvious, there are some differences between us--the precise formulations and language--ah, and that's gonna happen between friends...."  [This statement that was made by Barack Obama about the relationship between Benjamin Netanyahu and Barack Obama surely does seem like crap to me, given that Barack Obama, by undercutting Benjamin Netanyahu, is probably not "friends" with Benjamin Netanyahu, and the feeling is probably "mutual" in Benjamin Netanyahu's mind.]

    Sunday, May 22, 2011 (at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference (or the AIPAC Policy Conference) in Washington, D.C.):
    "...Let me repeat what I actually said on Thursday, not what I was reported to have said.  I said that the United States believes that negotiations should result in two states with permanent Palestinian borders with Israel, Jordan, and Egypt and permanent Israeli borders with Palestine.  The border of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 line with mutually agreed swaps so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.  The Palestinian people must have the right to govern themselves and reach their potential in a sovereign and contiguous state...."  [I have no comment about this quoted material at this time, but I urge you to see the entry for Thursday, May 19, 2011.]
   "...You know, it was my reference to the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps that received the lion's share of the attention, including just now.  Since my position has been misre, misrepresented several times, let me reaffirm what 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps means.  By definition, it means that the parties themselves--Israelis and Palestinians--will negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967.  That what mutually agreed upon swaps means.  It is a well-known formula for all who have worked on this issues for a generation...."  [Since I am not an expert about Israeli history, I make no comment about this quoted material, but I report that a man named Tom Marr, while substitute hosting the nationally syndicated radio show called The Mark Levin Show, noted on Monday May 23, 2011, that the border issue really comes down to the 1949 lines, and for you to understand the border issue properly, you will have to do good research, and, anyway, I have no time to present a discussion of the border issue here.]
    [Note: On June 4, 2008, Barack Obama made this statement at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference: "...Any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel's identity as a Jewish state with secure recognized defensable borders, and Jersulam will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided...."  You are urged to see the "Samantha Power" entry in my document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which shows at least one of Barack Obama's close advisor is anti-Israel and which can be reached by using this link: Crud.]

    Tuesday, May 24, 2011 (at Buckingham Palace in London, England, during a toast to the Queen Elizabeth):
    "...Ladies and gentlemen, please stand with me and raise your glasses, as I propose a toast.  To her majesty the Queen.  The vitality of the special relationship between our peoples, and in the words of Shakespeare--To this blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.  To the Queen...."  [Okay, what do we have here?  At the word "vitality," an orchestra began to play.  It seems normally, toasts to the Queen are supposed to be short statements, and it seems, a person giving a toast will usually end with something like "To her majesty the Queen," which is a normal cue for the orchestra to begin playing.  I think Barack Obama made a error--either unknowingly or purposely.  The matter does not matter, since I have another topic to bring up.  The toast was a "flat" presentation, and when I heard the last words of the toast (as I listed here), I immediately thought of a final statement made by Basil Rathbone (as Sherlock Holmes) in the 1943-released film entitled Sherlock Holmes and the Secret Weapon, and it is a statement that I remember from time to time, because--even though the movie may not be the best in the Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce series of films about Sherlock Holmes--the film is likable and Basil Rathbone did a good job saying: "Yes, this fortress built by nature for herself, this blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.":  I urge you to go to YouTube and see the movie entitled Sherlock Holmes and the Secret Weapon, and when you get done seeing the movie, you should have a good feeling within you about the movie, which does not happen with so many movies and television shows today.  Oh, the music played by the orchestra during the event attended by Barack Obama was the national anthem of England.]

    Wednesday, May 25, 2011 (Barack Obama at a press event with the Prime Minister of England, David Cameron):
    "...This is going to be a constant process of trying some things, making adjustments.  There are gonna be opportunities for us to make investments.  There are gonna be other areas where we think those were good ideas at the time--programs that were started with the best of intentions--and it turns our they're not working as well as they should.  If a program's not working well, we should get rid of it and put that money into programs that are working well.  It means that we got to make sure that we take a balance approach and that there's a mix of cuts but also thinking about how do we generate revenue so that there's a match between money going out and money coming in...."  [This statement is garbage, a part of which is Marxism, and I tell you to ask yourself--What does it mean?  Oh, you should hear in your head--more taxes but no reduced spending.  And you should focus on that "investment" thing again--something that I have talked about in the past.  And I say in jest: "Yes, what Barack Obama does is done with 'the best of intentions.'"]

    Wednesday, May 25, 2011 (a speech at Westminster Hall, London, England):
    "...In this century, our joint leadership will require building new partnerships, adapting to new circumstances, and remaking ourselves to meet the demands of the new era.  That begins with our economic leadership...."  [I present this quotation so that you can wonder what is really meant by the words, given the speaker--Barack Obama--is a socialist or communist and such.  What is the "new era"?  It seems to me it is a "new era" of socialism/communism in the United States of America, which is what I am well aware Barack Obama has been pushing for as the main structure for the United States of America.  The United States of America has had partnerships with countries--mostly good countries and some not-so-good countries--for years and year, so you should wonder what are the "new partnerships" hinted at by Barack Obama?  Well, he has been making friends with the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East, such as in Egypt, and with other radicals in bad countries around the world.  What are the "new circumstances"?  It seems to me it is, for one, a more radical Islamic way for countries in the Middle East, such as Egypt.]

    Tuesday, June 7, 2011 (a press event with German Chancellor Angela Merkel):
    "...The overall trend that we've seen over the last fifteen months--two-million, over two-million jobs created over the last fifteen months, ah, eeh, you know, a rebounding of the manufacturing sector in the United States, ah, that's exemplified by, ah, the recovery of the Big Three auto makers here--ah, all indicates that, ah, we have set a path that will lead us to long-term economic growth...."  [This document shows time and time again how Barack Obama lies, so how can any prediction about the future that he gives be taken seriously?  In addition, what is the target date related to "long-term economic growth" or over what period of time is involved?  Barack Obama is vague in all matters, as you can see when you look at what he has said in speeches and such.  So you have to wonder if long-term economic growth that is clearly evident is tied to sixth months, one year, two years, three years, four years, five years, six years, seven years, eight years, et cetera.  When does the long-term economic growth officially begin or what will be the start date?  Right now, the economy is not really growing; for example, the housing market--related to housing prices--is still falling, so people, such as retires are losing equity that they have built up in their houses and they hoped to use for retirement, and the general unemployment rate went up a little last month (it is a little above nine percent), and the federal debt has continually increased and is increasing every month, and, by the way, General Motors and Chrysler have yet to pay back the American public completely the loans that they were given to stay alive.  Where is Barack Obama's real proof that "we have set a path that will lead us to long-term economic growth"?]

    Monday, June 13, 2011 (in Durham, North Carolina):
    "...Shovel, shovel ready was not as, ah, shovel ready as we expected...."  [When the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was being pushed by Barack Obama for passage and passed into law by Barack Obama in 2009, Barack Obama was saying and said the law was going to help put people back to work with "shovel ready" jobs.  It turned out to be a lot of crap.  Here, at Durham, Barack Obama sort of joked about the "shovel ready" idea.  And I say in jest, "Yes, it was all so funny, Mr. President--your sham of a law and your scam wrapped up in a law."]

    Tuesday, June 14, 2011 (an interview shown on Today on NBC-TV):
    "...We are now in a process where the economy is growing again, and we created two-million jobs over the last fifteen months, but it's not a fast as it needs to be to make up for all the jobs that were lost.  The other thing that happened, though--and this goes to the point you were just making--is there are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers.  You, you see it when you go to a bank and, dah, you use an ATM--you don't go to a bank teller.  Or you go to the airport, and you're using a kiosk instead of, ah, checking in at the gate...."   [Most certainly, this statement shows how highly defective and evil is the mind of Barack Obama, working to pass along a lie and deception.  For one, ATMs have existed since the 1970s, and because these machines exist, people have jobs--people design and build ATMs, and people transport and install ATM machines, and people fill ATM machines with money, and people repair ATM machines, and people create and build and install ATM network systems and computer systems, et cetera.  Barack Obama's mind is crap, and I would tell that to him while standing right in front of him and looking him in the eye, and, in fact, the word that I would actually used is "sh...."  And since you may be too stupid to understand my thoughts, I say that, the unemployment rate shot up only about three-years ago, and so it is not because ATMs exist that the unemployment rate shot up and job growth in the country is bad.  Oh, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported around this time that, since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was made a law, there has been a net loss of jobs in the country--the number is about 1.9-million jobs lost (141.7-million jobs in February 2009 minus 139-million jobs in May 2011  (Cover, Matt.  "1.9 Million Fewer Americans Have Jobs Today Than When Obama Signed Stimulus."  CNSNews.com, 14 June 2011.).  Yes, Barack Obama lied again!]
    "...So all these have created changes in the economy, and what we have to do now--and that's what this 'Jobs Council' is all about--is identifying where jobs of the future are going to be...."  [This statement was made by Barack Obama right after Barack Obama had said the statement that I present in the previous paragraph, and this statement is more crap.  Government or some "Jobs Council" cannot determine where "the jobs of the future are going to be" and that is for many reasons; for example, in the 1800s, government could not and did not predict that the manual typewriter would be invented and become commonplace in the country, and in late 1960s, the government could not and did not predict the personal-computer age would take off in the 1970s, and government cannot predict what next big development might be.  Barack Obama's mind is in the clouds or the wind of the windmills that he is pushing on the country.]

    Wednesday, June 22, 2011 (an address to the nation about the war effort and troops in Afghanistan):
    "...Good evening!...."  [That is how another speech--this speech--from Barack Obama began, and, this time, although Barack Obama was in the White House, Barack Obama was not flanked or backed up by any American flag, and that is odd.  The speech was routine, having, for example, a lot of Obama platitudes and clichés.  As I expected, Barack Obama did mention that he killed Osama bin Laden, and I felt it was said as part of a theme to show Americans that American troops are not needed as much in Afghanistan any more, since Osama bin Laden-- a leader of a terrorist enemy--is now gone.]
    "...For this reason in one of the most difficult decisions that I've made a President, I ordered an additional 30,000 American troops into Afghanistan...."  [It took him a long time--a number of months--to make the decision about adding troops, as if he were stalling.]
    "...As a result, starting next month, we will be able to remove ten-thousand of our troops from Afghanistan by the end of this year, and we will bring home a total of thirty-three-thousand troops by next summer, fully recovering the surge I announced at West Point.  After this initial reduction, our troops will continue coming home at a steady pace, as Afghan security forces move into the lead.   Our mission will change from combat to support.  By 2014, this process of transition will be complete...."  [Okay, I note it.   Now I ask--What are we doing in Libya?  And I say, "Yes, Barack Obama is getting the 30,000 out a little before the election of November 2012, and it sounds like a political tactic that he can exploit in ads and such."]
    "...We stand not for empire but for self-determination...."  [It has been said that Barack Obama believes America has been imperialistic, and then we got this statement about "empire."]
    "...Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war--at a time of rising debt and hard economic times....."  [Okay, I have to use Barack Obama's number.  A trillion (or 1,000 billion) divided by ten is 100 billion, which means the military expense of war--as an average--was 100-billion dollars a year for ten years.  Yet, over the last two years or so, Barack Obama has increased the national debt by about five-trillion dollars (or 5,000-billion dollars), and, mostly, Democrats were responsible for the economic crash of 2008 and the hard economic times--and that is fact.  Oh, I have not added in the increase in the debt related to unfunded liabilities, such as Social Security, which is now paying out more than it takes in, and Barack Obama has made no proposals to fix the problem with the debt related to unfunded liabilities.]

    Thursday, June 23, 2011 (at one of several events in New York on this day, many of which were simply fundraisers for him):
    "...I had the great honor of seeing some of you, because, ah, a comrade of yours--Jared Monti--who was the first person who I was able to award the Medal of Honor who actually came back, ah, and wasn't, dah, receiving it posthumously...."  [I say in jest, "Yes, Genius Barack Obama was in top form."  On September 17, 2009, Barack Obama said at the White House when, for one, giving out a Medal of Honor related to Jared Monti: "...And then as the artillery that Jared had called in came down, and enemy fire slowed, then stop.  The patrol had defeated the attack.  They had held on, but not without a price.  By the end of the night, Jared and three others, including the soldier he died trying to save, had given their lives...."  Oops!  On June 23, 2011, Barack Obama goofed!  (By the way, the 2009 quotation of Barack Obama was yet available from Freedom's Lighthouse (freeedomslighthouse.net/) on June 24, 2011.)]

    Wednesday, June 29, 2011 (a press conference in Washington, D.C.):
    "...If we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, if we choose a tax break for corporate jet owners, if we choose to ke, keep tax breaks for oil and gas companies that are makin' hundreds of billions of dollars, then that means we gotta cut some kids off from getting a college scholarship, that means we gotta stop funding certain grants for medical research, that means that food safety is compromised...."  [Well, Barack Obama did another press conference in which he passed along crap and used scare tactics.  During the press conference, Barack Obama attacked "corporate jet owners"--they were a big enemy today, as they had been in the past (by the way, in February 2009, Barack Obama's "Stimulus" act had tax breaks to buy such jets), which had come after Barack Obama had attacked orally auto executives for using jets to get to Washington, D.C., and hurt the jet-making industry.]
    "...The revenue we're talking about isn't coming out of the pockets of middle-class families that are strugglin', it's comin' out of folks who are doing extraordinary well and are enjoying the lowest tax rates since before I was born.  They're lower than they been since the 1950s.  And you can afford it.  You'll still be able to ride on your corporate jet, you're just gonna have to pay a little more...."  [During the press conference, Barack Obama talked like a street thug, dropping letters of words and using nonstandard words, and this "quoted" material is one example, which, for example, also brings out the idea of "corporate jets" again.]
    "...If we do not have those revenues, then the kinds of cuts that would be required might compromise the National Weather Service...."  [What jackass man brings up the idea that the National Weather Service will be hurt if Barack Obama does not get tax breaks (what he called "revenues") tossed out?  On this date, before any tax breaks happen, the National Weather Service is doing what it does, and if the tax breaks do not get tossed out, the National Weather Service continues to do the same--because things remain the same.  Barack Obama is the jackass!]
    "...The question now is--Are we gonna step up and get this done?  And, ye, ye, you know, ah, Malia and Sasha, ah, generally, finish their homework a day ahead of time.  Malia thirteen.  Sasha's ten...."  [Malia was born on July 4, 1998.  On June 14, 2011, Michelle Obama said: "...Barack has a memory like a steel trap.  It's a gift.  He will never forget your story...."  Oops, Barack!]

    Tuesday, July 5, 2011 (at a press briefing at the White House):
    "...To get there, I believe we need a balanced approach.  We need to take on spending in domestic programs, in defense programs, in entitlement programs, and we need to take on spending in the tax code, spending on certain tax breaks and deductions for the wealthiest of Americans.  This will require both parties to get out of our comfort zones, and both parties to agree on real compromise...."  [The theme was the debt-limit negotiations going on in the U.S. Congress, and of the number of themes that I could take up here, I choose only two.  Notice how Barack Obama suggested they must take on "spending in the tax code."  This statement is another from Barack Obama that shows he thinks your being able to keep money or businesses being able to keep money is a burden on the government, though the government did not create what resulted in the money.  Yes, the government's not being able to take in money from people and businesses--tax people more--is a burden, since, as Barack Obama tries to push on you, that money is being given away by the government, which the government cannot afford to do now.  Barack Obama's idea on compromise is crap!  If you have two possibilities--keep spending more money than you have or reduce spending--there is no compromise point or no middle ground, because the only good choice is to stop spending beyond the upper limit on what is available to spend.]

    Wednesday, July 6, 2011 (a "twitter" event--a "townhall"--in Washington, D.C.):
    "...And the reason I thought this was, ah, ah, an important question is, as all of you know, ah, we are going through a spirited debate in Washington, but it's important to get the whole country involved in making a determination about what are the programs that can help us grow, can create jobs, can improve our education system, maintain, ah, our clean air and clean water, ah, and one of those things that are waste that we shouldn't be, ah, investing in, because they're not helping us grow or create jobs or creating news businesses, ah, and, ah, that debate is going to be heating up over the next couple of weeks, so I'd love to hear from the American people, see, ah, see, ah, what thoughts they have   [The question that Barack Obama was supposed to answer was: "In order to reduce the deficit, what costs would you cut and what investments would you keep?"  I could talk about the questioner's defective use of ":investments"--and the idea of government making "investments" as defined by Barack Obama is defective--will not be explained here fully.  The main point that you should notice is Barack Obama never answered the question, such as by specifically noting something that can be cut., and simply ran off a bunch of words.]
    "....Never in our history has the United States defaulted on its debt.  The debt ceiling should not be something that is used as a gun against the heads of, ah, the American people to extract tax breaks for corporate jet owners, for oil and gas companies that are making billions of dollars because the price of ga, ah, oh, ah, gasoline has gone up so high.  Ah, I mean I'm happy to have those debates.  I think the American people are on my side on this.  What we need to do is have a balanced approach where everything's on the table...."  [This part is loaded with nonsense.  The federal government is always taking in enough money every day, such as through taxes and royalties, to pay out on debt obligations, such as ten-year bonds or U.S. Savings Bonds, that come due.  Really, the "debt ceiling," which puts a limit on how much debt that the federal government can have and, in turn, also puts an upper limit on the amount of money that the federal government can further borrow (given that the upper limit blocks any borrowing of money at points greater than what the upper limit is) can also be considered a "deficit-spending ceiling," which is the upper limit or upper barrier on the amount of spending that can be done by the federal government, and that means, for one, if the government lacks money on hand that can be used to spend, it cannot borrow money that would put the deficit figure beyond that limit and must cut back on spending on things to not go over the limit.  What Barack Obama is trying to do is get the limit set higher so that the federal government can spend more and more money beyond what it takes in and, if need be, borrow more and more money, making the debt burden higher and higher.]
    "...This is something that we shouldn't be toying with.  What Dexter's question referred to was there are some people who say that under The Constitution, ah, it's unconstitutional for Congress not to, ah, allow Treasury to pay its bills, ah, and are suggesting that this should be challenged under The Constitution.  Ah, I don't think we should even get to the constitutional issue.  Congress has a responsibility to make sure we pay our bills.  Ah, we've always paid them in the past.  The notion that the U.S. is going to default on its debt, ah, is just responsible...."    [The question was: "Mr. President, will you issue an Executive Order to raise the debt ceiling pursuant to Section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment?"  Okay, here we go!  The United States Constitution defines what the Executive Branch (the U.S. President) can do and what the Legislative Branch (the U.S. Congress) can do, and it is the U.S. Congress--as noted in "Article One"--that determines what gets spent by passing bills, though each bill must be signed into law by the U.S. President to make the spending officially sanctioned, and the U.S. President cannot simply make an Executive Order (like a dictate of a dictator) to make it possible for the federal government to now spend more money by raising the "debt ceiling" or the "deficit-spending ceiling" from one figure to a higher figure.  Barack Obama once again passed along crap, since the Fourteenth Amendment has no bearing on the deficit-spending ceiling, which is the subject of the question, and Barack Obama did not note that he has not the power to make such an Executive Order.]

    Thursday, July 7, 2011 (a press event):
    "...I want to emphasis that nothing is agreed to until everything's agreed to.  And the parties are still far apart on a wide range of issues, ah, but again I thought that all the leaders came in a spirit of, ah, compromise, in a spirit of wanting to solve problems on behalf of the American people.  Everybody acknowledged that, ah, the issue of our debt and our deficit is something that needs to be tackled now...."  [The topic is the debt ceiling or the deficit-spending ceiling, and Barack Obama passed along more crap, especially--"...I thought that all the leaders came in a spirit of, ah, compromise, in a spirit of wanting to solve problems on behalf of  the American people....", since that is not what the Democrats in the U.S. Congress have been showing for at least the last two years, a big example of which is the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2011, which is highly opposed by many citizens.]

    Monday, July 11, 2011 (a press conference at the White House):
    "...First of all, all of us agree we should use this opportunity, ah, to do something meaningful on debt and deficits, and the reports that have been out there have been largely accurate, ah, that Speaker Boehner, ah, and myself had been in a series of conversations about doing the biggest deal possible so that we could actually resolve our debt and deficit challenge for a long stretch of time...."   [The Web site for the White House this called the event--"President Obama Speaks on the Status of Efforts to Find a Balanced Approach to Deficit Reduction."  "Balanced Reduction"--this term makes me puke.  Barack Obama has overspent, and it is time to cut back on spending, given there are most certainly things that do not need to be spent money on now.  To Barack Obama, though, a "balanced approach" is to take in more taxes (what he calls "revenues") so that he can keep spending money and can spend even more money so that the deficit can grow bigger--since if he takes in more money, he is not going to stop spending.   This event was loaded with clichés, lies and misinformation, and attacks on people, or it was simply more crap from a little man and an evil man.  By the way, a good speaker says "...Speaker Boehner and I...." and not "Speaker Boehner and myself...."   Using "myself" is wrong.]
    "...And it is possible for us to construct a package that would be balanced, would share sacrifice, would involve both parties taking on their sacred cows, would involve some meaningful changes to Medicare and Social Security and Medicaid that would preserve the integrity of the programs and keep our sacred trust with our seniors but make sure those programs were there for not just this generation but for the next generation, that it is possible for us to bring in revenues in a way that does not impede our current recovery, ah, but is fair and balanced...."  [We got "balanced" and his idea of "shared sacrifice" (spreading out the misery that is caused by him) and, of course, "revenues"--right here, he hit all crap themes together.]
    "...Nobody has talked about increasing taxes.  Nobody has talked about increases, increasing taxes next year.  What was have talked about is that, starting in 2013, that we have gotten rid of some of these egregious loopholes that are benefiting corporate jet owners or oil companies at a time where there makin' billions of dollars of profits, what we have said as, as part of a broader package, we should have revenues, and the best place to get those revenues are from folks like me who have been extraordinarily fortunate and that millionaires and billionaires can afford to pay a little bit more, goin' back to the Bush tax rates...."  [Okay, what a mess this set of words is.  Barack Obama said that "Nobody has talked about increasing taxes...", but then Barack Obama said that "...What we have said as, as part of a broader package, we should have revenues...." which in his context is "taxes" on millionaires and billionaires.   Incidentally, Barack Obama's use of "loopholes" is crap.  Tax laws are tax laws, and there are no such things as "loopholes" that people are able to use--companies simply follow the laws or get taken to court by the IRS.  Yes, Barack Obama was trying to make you think people are getting away with not paying taxes through some type of illegal means--loopholes.  That is nonsense!  In addition, the Bush tax cuts are in place right now, so what was Barack Obama saying about "the Bush tax rates"?]
    "...I have bent over backwards to work with the Republicans to try to come up with a formulation that doesn't require them to vote, ah, sometime in the next month to increase taxes...."  [I say in jest, "Right, Barack Obama has bent over backwards to work with the Republicans."]
    "...And so if, in fact, ah, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are sincere--and I believe they are, that they don't wanna see the U.S. government default--then they're gonna have to compromise just like Democrats are gonna have to compromise, just like I have shown myself willing to compromise...."  [Here, we have "compromise" crap and other crap.  Over the last two years plus, Barack Obama has not been a compromiser.  And if the "debt ceiling" is not raised, which is a big topic of the talks in the U.S. Congress right now, the country will not go in default--the government will simply have to cut back on spending.]
    "...Well, le', le', let me, let me distinguish between professional politicians and, ah, the, the public at large.  Ah, you know, the public is not paying close attention to the ins and outs of how, ah,a Treasury auction goes--ah, they shouldn't.  They're worryin' about their family, they're worrying about their jobs, they're, they're worrying about, ah, their neighborhood.  Ah, they've got a lot of other things on their plate.  We're paid to worry about it!...."  [Yes, maybe the public does not have to pay attention daily to Treasury auctions, but the public is not--as Barack Obama hinted at--completely "stupid," or as I say--"Professional politicians are not better than the general public is," evidence of which can be found in how messed up politicians--especially communists in the federal government--have made the economy through nonsense polices and regulations, especially over the last two years or so.  Did you hear that Barack Obama officially put down the public through the statement?   Barack Obama did!]
    "...Now, I will say that some of the professional politicians no better, and for them to say that we shouldn't be raising, ah, the debt ceiling is irresponsible.  They know better!...."  [The professional politicians to whom Barack Obama referred are Republicans, especially "conservatives."  Barack Obama put people down here.  And Barack Obama is wrong about their being irresponsible, since the country will not fall apart if the debt ceiling is no raised.]
    "...Ah, and, se, this, this is not something that, dah, ah, eh, eh, you know, I, I am, am, ah, makin' up...."  [I say in jest, "Here was one of Barack Obama's smooth moments."  Read it aloud.  Barack Obama's brain stalled.  He was not on the teleprompter here.]
    "..If you're a progressive who cares about the integrity of Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid and believes that it is a part of what makes our country great that we look after, ah, our seniors and we look after the most vulnerable, then we have an obligation to make sure we, ah, ah, make those changes that are required to make it sustainable over the long run...."  [Here, Barack Obama passed along crap and communism (or Marxism).  A "progressive" is a socialist or a communist or the like, all of whom I define a "enslavists" or "enslavist's supporters."  And Barack Obama pushed the idea--the lie--that only "progressives" are concerned about seniors, which is a lie.  Conservatives take care of seniors and think about seniors, since they have relatives and family members who are seniors.  In addition, Barack Obama and the Democrats through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 have set up rules in which Medicare will be cut by $500-billion, if the law is not made void soon.  Barack Obama lied!  By the way, this year Social Security is paying out more than it is taking in.]
    "...Social Security is not the source of our deficit problems...."  [It is one of the problems, and Barack Obama lied!]
    "...That's what the revenue debate's about.  It's not because I wanna raise revenues for the ri, for the sake of raising revenues or I've got some grand ambition to create, dah, ah, a bigger government...." [Barack Obama could not get the statement out smoothly.  I do not believe his statement.  Over the last two years, Barack Obama has been increasing the size of the federal government, and some departments, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, have had big increases in budgets.  In addition, since Barack Obama is pushing to raise the "debt ceiling," it is obvious Barack Obama is working to get the ability to have the federal government to spend more money and get bigger.]
    "...Ah, we've got, ah, eh,  the potential to create an infrastructure bank that could put construction workers to work, right now, rebuilding our roads and our bridges and our, ah, ah, our, our vital infrastructure all across the country....."  [This is worrisome stuff!  For decades, the country has been building and rebuilding roads--involving the federal government, state governments, local governments, and businesses.  Why does a special bank system need to be create?  I say that, to Barack Obama, the reason to create the bank is to get the federal government more in control of the banking system of the country, where it would have the ability to pass out money to entities it wants to pass it out to in relation to work and contracts--entities that support his way of government.  That is bad!]
    "...As along as that package was sufficiently progressive so that, ah, we weren't balancing the budget on the backs on middle-class families and working-class families, and we we're letting hedge-fund manager or, ah, authors of best sellin' books off the hook...."  [During the press conference, I looked up the "Best Sellers" lists of The New York Times ("Best Sellers."  The New York Times, 11 July 2011.).  In essence, what Barack Obama did was attack the writers on the "Best Sellers" lists, even liberals, such as Tina Fey (a executive producer and actor on 30 Rock), whose book (listed under "Combined Print & E-book Nonfiction") is Bossypants.  Well, one of the books that Barack Obama (a bossy man and dictator-like man), in essence, attacked was Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon (which I list in my document that gives suggestions of books to read, which can be reached by using his Reading link), which shows that mostly Democrats were responsible for the economic crash of around 2008, and, by the way, one of the authors of the book is a writer for The New York Times, a highly liberal publication--socialistic and communistic.  Yes, you have to laugh a bit at Barack Obama because of this statement from him, and then you have to realize what else was said.  Barack Obama pushed the idea that balancing the budget in some ways--the Republican ways, such as by holding back on taxing the "rich" more and more--is done on the backs of "middle-class families" and "working-class families," and that is a nonsense thought.]
    [Note: I stop here, though I could attack more presented at the event by Barack Obama.]

    Tuesday, July 12, 2011 (an interview for CBS Evening News with Scott Pelley):
    "...I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 2, if we haven't resolved this issue, because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it...."  [The main topic here was Social Security checks doing out or not and raising the debt ceiling.  This statement shows the nature of an evil man--Barack Obama.  First, Barack Obama lied--there is enough money in the coffers to send out the Social Security checks for August 3, 2011.  Second, the federal government can cut other areas of spending, such as cut back on sending money to other countries for a short while or cut back on giving money to entities that are like ACORN-type groups.  Third, Barack Obama has pushed the country in deeper and deeper debt (somewhere around five-thousand-billion dollars) since January 20, 2009, and, here, Barack Obama was pushing the idea that what is going to be cut first if the debt ceiling is not raised is Social Security checks to senior citizens, but--I note--if Barack Obama gets the ability to spend more and more money, which can happen by raising the debt ceiling, the new debt ceiling will be reached again in the near future, and then there will be another push to raise the debt ceiling--and then the country will have an even more disastrous economic picture, and Social Security will be even more in the hole (this year, Social Security pays out more than it takes in).  Yes, this statement from Barack Obama shows the nature of an evil man--using senior citizens to fight against and rally against the Republicans so that he can beat the Republicans and hurt all senior citizens and their children and grandchildren by sticking them with extreme debt.]
    [Note: An entity called Social Security Institute published an article called "Obama Threatens to Starve Grandma?" (under "Beltway Confidential" heading) on July 12, 2011, and it was written by Mark Tapscott, and it showed that the federal government would not default on its debts if the debt ceiling was not raised.  The article noted that the federal government takes in about $200-billion a month, and to default, the government would have to not be able to pay interest on the "debt," (related to such things as Treasury Bonds, Treasury Bills, and U.S. Savings Bonds), which, as the articled noted, was about $29-billion a month.  You can see the federal government has enough money--cash--each month to pay the interest on the debt.  In addition, the federal government would have enough money to send out Social Security checks (about $49.2-billion), pay for Medicare and Medicaid (about $50-billion), pay active military service personnel (about $2.9-billion), and cover veterans (about $2.9-billion), and there would be about $39-billion left.  I have talked about the necessary items, which, you can see, need not be affected by not raising the debt ceiling, but the federal government might have to cut back on paying out for other things and giving away money to other things, not-so-necessary things, such as to ACORN-like entities and foreign countries (as some type of defective idea of aid).]

    Friday, July 15, 2011 (a press conference at the White House):
    "...We have a chance to stabilize America's finances, ah, for a decade, for fifteen years or twenty years, if we're willing to seize the moment...."  [So, Barack Obama held another press conference.  He brought out the same old nonsense--millionaires and billionaires, oil companies, jet owners, "shared sacrifice," "corporate loopholes,": et cetera--and, here, Barack Obama pushed a big lie about stabilizing "America's finances," since putting the government in more debt, which Barack Obama wants to do, as shown by his wish to raise the "debt ceiling," does not stabilize the finances of the country.  Barack Obama spoke crap!]
    "...Ah, this is not some abstract issue.  Ah, these are obligations that the United States has taken on in the past, ah, that Congress has run up the credit card, and we now have an obligation to pay our bills...."  [This statement was a tactical move from Barack Obama.  Can you detect the goal?  Yes, Barack Obama put the blame for running up the credit card on Congress.  It takes a U.S. President to make a bill from the U.S. Congress a law through signature, and since January 20, 2011, Barack Obama has put his signature to 5,000-billion dollars in more debt for the federal government, and that is unprecedented for the amount of time in world history--it is a historic disaster.]
    "...You have eighty percent of the American people who support a balanced approach.  Eighty percent of the American people support an approach that includes revenues and includes cuts, so the notion that somehow the American people aren't sold is not the problem.  The problem is members of Congress, ah, are dug in ideologically, ah, into various positions because, ah, ah, they, they boxed themselves in with previous statements, and, you know, this, this is not a, a matter of, ah, the American people knowing what the right thing to do is, this is a matter of Congress doin' the right thing and reflecting, ah, the will of the American people, and if we do that, we will have solved this problem...."  [There is no evidence, such as from an poll or survey, that "eighty percent of the American people" want Barack Obama to have his "balanced approach."  Barack Obama did a big, big, big, big lie!  Notice Barack Obama talked about "Congress doin' the right thing and reflecting, ah, the will of the American people...." but Barack Obama lied about what the wish of the American people was at the time.]
    [Note: I urge you to see P.S. #17, which exists later in the document.]

    Friday, July 22, 2011 (another press conference in Washington, D.C.):
    "...This was an extraordinarily fair deal.  If it was unbalanced, it was unbalanced, ah, in the direction of not enough revenue...." [This event was held in the evening, and the press room had a number of empty seats, and those of the press who attended were not first-string members.  The topic was some ideas about dealing with the debt ceiling and government spending presented by, it seems, Barack Obama or the Barack Obama administration, and, here, he was calling his deal a fair deal.  Notice how Barack Obama tied the idea of "balance" to taxes, and how he was trying to persuade listeners that he was actually proposing a plan that was in his mind "unbalanced," not having enough taxes, and yet, you are supposed to see Barack Obama as the good guy who could not get enough tax increases accepted in the U.S. Congress.]
    "...In the interest of bi, being serious about deficit reduction, I was willing to take a lot of heat from my party, and I spoke to Democratic leaders yesterday, and although they didn't sign off on a plan, they were willing to engage in serious negotiations, despi, despite a lot of heat from a lot of interest groups around the country in order to make sure that we actually dealt with this problem...."  [Here, Barack Obama tried to make it seem he was working for you, and, here, Barack Obama was working to make you feel sorry for him since he had to take a lot of heat--whatever that is--from his party.]
    "...Because the fact of the matter is the vast majority of the American people believe we should have a balanced approach...."  [To most Americans, who are basing their beliefs on lies from Barack Obama, what does "balanced approach" mean to them?"]
    "....If you do not have any revenues, as the most recent, ah, Republican plan, ah that's been put forth in both the House and the Senate proposed, if you have no revenues at all, what that means is more of a burden on seniors, more drastic cuts to education, more drastic cuts to research, a bigger burden on services that are going to middle-class families all across the country, and it essentially asks nothing of corporate jet owners, it asks nothing of oil and gas companies, it asks nothing from folks like me, who've done extremely well and can afford to do a little bit more...."   [This statement is "B.S." and lies!]
    "...In other words, if you don't have revenues, the entire thing ends up being tilted on the backs of the poor and middle-class families...."  [This statement is "B.S," and for Barack Obama as a U.S. President to say such a set of words makes me think of Barack Obama as punk.]
    "So, ah, here's what we're gonna do.  Ah, we have now run out of time!  I told Speaker Boehner, I've told, ah, Democratic-leader Nancy Pelosi, ah, I've told Harry Reid, and I've told Mitch McConnell, I want them here at eleven o'clock tomorrow.  We have run out of time, and they are going to have to explain to me how it is that we're gonna avoid default!...."  [This is more "B.S."  Barack Obama made it seem, here, he is putting his foot down--like a leader--and is demanding a solution.  And, then you have to realize, not raising the debt ceiling, which is the main topic of the discussions, will not cause the country to default on outstanding debt that is due right away.  Barack Obama was posturing and blowing smoke here.]
    "...Because the fact of the matter is that's what the American people are lookin' for--some compromise, some willingness to put partisanship aside, some willingness ta ignore talk radio or ignore activists in our respective bases and do the right thing...."  [This more "B.S."  Ask yourself--Are these the words of a good U.S. President?"  Also ask--"What is the 'right thing" in Barack Obama's defective mind?"]
    "...Now in terms of where we go next, here's the one thing that we've got to do--at minimum, we've gotta increase the debt ceiling.  At minimum!...."  [Wrong!  The country does not have to--have to--increase the debt ceiling.  I say that, if we increase the debt ceiling, Barack Obama--an evil man--wins, because Barack Obama gets to keep adding to the federal debt.]
    "...Republican-leader McConnell in the Senate put forward that said, ah, he's gonna give me the responsibility to raise the debt ceiling.  That way people in Congress can vote against it!  But at least it gets done.  I'm willing to take the responsibility.  That's my job....."  [I say that McConnell's proposed plan was crap, since it was giving more power, which is the ability to raise the debt ceiling, to a bad man--Barack Obama, who is working like a dictator.  Mitch McConnell screwed up with his plan.  Yes, Barack Obama would have loved the plan to go through.]
    "...I'm getting letters from people who write me and say--At the end of every month, I have to skip meals.  Senior citizens on Social Security who are just hanging on by a thread.  Folks, you know,  who have severe disabilities who are desperate every single month to try to figure out how they're gonna make ends meet...."  [Here, Barack Obama--a U.S. President--was fear mongering, trying to scare people into believing, for example, Social Security checks might not go out and people would be hurt.  What crap Barack Obama is.  Of course, if the economy was not purposely being hurt by the policies of Barack Obama, maybe Barack Obama would not get as many such letters.  Actually, at a given moment, some people will have hard time and will write a U.S. President, believing the U.S. President can help them directly.]
    "...I think this whole episode has indicated the degree to which at least a Democratic President has been willing to make some tough compromises...."  [This statement--promoting himself--is "B.S."  Where is the proof of his compromising?  In addition, if Barack Obama proposes crap, why would anyone opposed to the crap want to compromise in relation to the crap?]

    Monday, July 25, 2011 (an appearance at the National Council of La Raza Annual Conference):
    "...It may sound good to save a lot of money over the next five years, but not if we sacrifice our future for the next fifty, and that's why people from both parties have said that the best way to take on our deficit is with a balanced approach, one where the wealthiest Americans and big corporations pay their fair share too...."  [This event was scheduled to run from July 23, 2011, to July 26, 2011, and to learn what La Raza is about, you are strongly urged to see my document entitled "La Raza": Yet Another Enemy in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this link: La Raza.  Like La Raza, Barack Obama is working to dismantle the United States of America, and although La Raza and Barack Obama are working to break down the United States of America and hurt the country, Barack Obama spoke at least some nonsense to those at this event on July 25, 2011.  This comment within quotations marks is one example.  Oh, ask yourself--"What is 'fair share' in Barack Obama's mind?"]
    "...Before we stop funding energy research, we should ask oil companies and corporate jet owners ta give up special tax breaks that other folks don't get..."  [Consider only some points of nonsense.  First, once again, Barack Obama brought up "corporate jet owners," which he has been taking about since at least June 29, 2011 (look at the entries between June 29, 2011, and this entry).  Second, for decades and decades and decades, oil companies have used countless amounts of money to do research and develop on getting oil, and it has not been the federal government that has been the driving force in doing the research and development, and, really, it has not been the federal government that has been instrumental in doing research and development in any areas related to energy since the country was founded.]
    "...Before we ask college students to pay more to go to college, we should ask hedge-fund managers to stop paying taxes that are lower in, in, in terms of rates than their secretaries...."  [I say--"What the heck is this crap from Barack Obama?"  Hedge-fund managers pay personal income taxes, and they are very likely to pay more taxes than their secretaries pay, and that comes down to so many reasons related to life and business and economics, such as a person with more experience and in a tougher job than another person gets paid more.  Through this set of words, Barack Obama tried to make two types of people hate hedge-fund managers--secretaries and college student.  The country has as a U.S. President a man who pushes hatred for others!]
    "...But we can't close our deficits by cutting spending...."   [I first saw the speech from Barack Obama at this event in replay form, and the replay form, like the live form, died right at the moment these words in quotations were presented (something went wrong with the feed).  I note, in other words, that what Barack Obama said is that we cannot stop spending--we have to continue spending--even though it increases the budget deficit.  Barack Obama showed he wishes not to cut government spending and he wishes to take in more taxes ("revenues").]

    Monday, July 25, 2011 (an address to the nation from the White House):
    "Good evening!...."  [Once again, Barack Obama--an insane man--came to the American people on television and radio and the Internet.  Right from the start, Barack Obama noted that he inherited a bad economy when he took office, so I can say that what he did was start off by trying to persuade the public he is not at fault for the economic problems.  An important part of the presentation for Barack Obama was to teach and persuade the ignorant and others that, in essence, they should compromise with a devil or with a man who wishes to kill a country or a man who wishes to hurt millions of persons--who is Barack Obama--and the word Barack Obama pushed was "balanced," which means to him--compromise with me so that I can spend more and more and more.]
    "...For the last decade, we've spent more money than we take in.  In the year 2000, the government had a budget surplus, but instead of using it to pay off our debt, the money was spent on trillions of dollars of new tax cuts, while two wars and an expensive prescription-drug program were simply added to our nation's credit card.  As a result, the deficit was on track to top one-trillion dollars the year I took office...."  [You should see, here, Barack Obama was putting the blame for the economic problems on the past and people of the past, hinting that he has done nothing bad, though he had added about 5,000-billion dollars--related to only discretionary spending--to the national debt since January 20, 2011.]
    "...The first approach says--Let's live within our means by making serious historic cuts in government spending, let's cut domestic spending to the lowest level it's been since Dwight Eisenhower was president, let's cut defense spending at the Pentagon by hundreds of billions of dollars, let's cut out waste and fraud in health-care programs like Medicare, and at the same time, let's make modest adjustments so that Medicare is still there for future generations.  Finally, let's ask the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations give up some of their breaks in the tax code and special deductions.  This balanced approach asks everyone to give a little without requiring anyone to sacrifice too much...."  [Ugh!  These are the words of an "enslavist."  His thoughts were set on attacking the weatlthy--those who can be seen better than he is--and lying and proposing "sacrifice" for everyone except for him, though he has caused a lot of the problems.]
    "...The only reason this balanced approach isn't on the way to becoming law right now is because a significant number of Republicans in Congress are insisting on a different approach--a cuts-only approach, an approach that doesn't ask the wealthiest Americans or biggest corporations to contribute at all, and because nothing is asked of those at the top of the income scale, such an approach would close the deficit only with more severe cuts to programs we all care about, cuts that place a greater burden on working families...."  [This is first degree crap.  For one, so-called weathy Americans and corporations do pay taxes.  Yes, Barack Obama wants you to get involved in getting the Republicans to support raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires, such as people who own and run small businesses, such as little stores, and make $250,000 in gross income a year (and in this speech, Barack Obama did prove that his millionaires and billionaires are really people who earn $250,000 or more gross income in a year).  And Barack Obama wants you to support his being able to spend more and more and more.]
    "...The debate is about how it should be done.  Most Americans regardless of political party don't understand how we can ask a senior citizen to pay more for her Medicare before we ask a corporate jet owner or the oil companies to give up tax breaks that other companies don't get...."  [And the crap just keeps on comin'!]
    "...How can we ask a student to pay more for college, before we ask hedge-fund managers to stop paying taxes at a lower rate than their secretaries...."  [It does seem we have heard this nonsense statement before--today!]
    "...And keep in mind that, under a balanced approach, that ninety-eight percent of Americans who make under $250,000 will see no tax increases at all--none...."  [Ugh!  It is back!  It is that old crap statement about $250,000.]
    "...So, we're left with a stalemate.  Now, what makes today's stalemate so dangerous is that it has been tied to something known as the 'debt ceiling,' a term that most people outside of Washington have probably never heard of before.  Understand, raising the debt ceiling does not allow Congress to spend more money, it simply gives our country the ability to pay the bills that Congress has already racked up.  [Barack Obama lied and passed along misinformation.  For one, when the "debt ceiling" is not raised, it blocks the federal government from taking on more debt by forcing the federal government to stopping spending on something, such as on a "road to nonwhere."  Yes, in essence, raising the debt ceiling does allow Congress to officially spend more, because Congress can finish spending on that which it knew would put it over the debt limit and would have been blocked from spending under the old debt limit.]
    "...And we have to do it [raise the debt ceiling] by next Tuesday, August 2, or else we won't be able to pay all of our bills.  Unfortunately, for the past several weeks, Republican House members have essentially said that the only way they'll vote to prevent America's first ever default is if the rest of us agree to their deep spending cuts-only approach...."  [This statement has crap and lies.  First, the country will not go into default if the debt ceiling is not raised by August 2, since the country will be able to pay off on maturing debt obligations, such as U.S. Savings Bonds (it only means some unnecessary programs--one of which is not Social Security--will run out of money or will have to do with less money.  Some Republican House members are doing the right thing--working to keep Barack Obama from putting the country in even more debt and allowing the country to take more money from the citizens of the United States of America and leaving them with less to live on and survive on.]
    "...If that happens and we default, we would not have enough money to pay all of our bills--bills that include monthly Social Security checks, Veterans benefits, and the government contracts we've signed with thousands of businesses.  For the first time in history, our country's AAA credit rating would be downgraded, leaving investors around the world to wonder whether the United States is still a good bet...."  [Here are more lies and falsehoods.  The country will not default if the date for raising the debt ceiling (August 2, 2011, it seems) is not met!  I say that investors would be more jittery if the country raised the debt ceiling and added more debt to the deficit by spending more, since those investors would see people living beyond their means and adding to the problem.]
    "...Interest rates would skyrocket on credit cards, on mortgages, and on car loans, which amounts to a huge tax hike on the American people...."  [Here, Barack Obama was deceptive and distorted the meaning of words.  Only a government entity can impose a "tax" or a "tax hike" in this country.  Businesses, such as credit-card companies, do not impose "tax hikes" on customers!]
    "...Based on what we've seen these past few weeks, we know what to expect six months from now.  The House of Representatives will once again refuse to prevent default unless the rest of us accept a cuts-only approach.  Again they will refuse to ask the wealthiest Americans to give up their tax cuts or deductions.  Again they will demand harsh cuts to programs like Medicare.  And once again the economy will be held captive unless they get their way...."  [Note: the "them" referred to is the opposition to Barack Obama in the House of Representatives--mostly Republicans (especially "conservatives").  Here, Barack Obama showed his evilness.  First, in essence, it was the members of the Democratic Party--headed by Barack Obama--who spearheaded a 500-billion dollar cut in Medicare through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and it was not the members of the Republican party.  So, Barack Obama lied!  Second, if the government does not get to raise the debt ceiling, to tax people and businesses more, and to get the ability to spend more money, the economy will not be held captive, since the private economy will be better off, having more money to work with.  So, Barack Obama lied again!]
    "...This is no way to run the greatest country on Earth.  It's a dangerous game that we've never played before, and we can't afford to play it now, not when the jobs and livelihoods of so many families are at stake.  We can't allow the American people to become collateral damage to Washington's political warfare...."  [During the speech, Barack Obama was really trying to make the Republicans enemies, even though it has been his Marxist/communistic political ideas of economics that are making American citizens collateral damage, and this quoted material is one example of his work!]
    "...The American people may have voted for divided government, but they didn't vote for a dysfunctional government, so I'm asking you to make your voice heard.  If you want a balanced approach to reducing the deficit, let your member of Congress know....."  [Here, Barack Obama was urging people to push the Republicans to work with Barack Obama and not fight Barack Obama, and Barack Obama wanted people to act, though they would be acting on false premises and lies.]
    [Note: I could analyze for you much more of the speech than what I have presented in this section, but I got tired of wasting my time--I have proved my point about this defective speech and this highly defective man.]

    Tuesday, August 2, 2011 (a press event related to the Budget Control Act of 2011):
    "...And I want to the American people for keeping up the pressure on their elected officials to put politics aside and work together for the good of the country...." [On Monday, August 1, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 as a bill was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, and on Tuesday, August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 as a bill was passed by the U.S. Senate, and after the bill was passed through the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama gave a speech before the press--another speech that was like a Marxist's campaign speech--at the White House.]
    "...This compromise guarantees more than two-trillion dollars in deficit reduction....."  [Liar!]
    "...Yet, it also allows us to keep making key investments in things like education and research that lead to new jobs...."  [Liar!]
    "...This is, however, just the first step.  This compromise requires that both parties work together on a larger plan to cut the deficit, which is important for the long-term health of our economy...."  [I say in jest--"Like it's going to happen."]
    "...You can't close the deficit with just spending cuts, we'll need a balanced approach, where everything's on the table...."  [This statement means Barack Obama will keep spending, and you can expect to have to cut back more, because various new taxes and increases in taxes are coming, and Barack Obama will keep spending, and you can expect to have to cut back more, because various increases in taxes and various new taxes are coming, et cetera.]
    "...It also means reforming our tax code so that the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations pay their fair share...."  [Yes, more taxes are coming.  Ask yourself--"To Barack Obama, where does the definition of "wealthiest Americans" begin or what dollar amountis the starating point?"  Ask yourself--"To Barack Obama, where does the definition of "biggest corporations" begin?"]
    "...And it means getting rid of taxpayer subsidies to oil and gas companies, tax loopholes that help billionaires pay a lower tax rate than teachers and nurses...."  [Crap!]
    "...I said it before, I will say it again--We can't balance the budget on the backs of the very people who have bore the biggest brunt of this recession...."  [B.S.!]
    "...Everyone's gonna have to chip in!...."  [Barack Obama gets to keep spending, and you get to pay for his purposeful destructive behavior, which is aimed at hurting everyone else, which includes you!]
    "...And in the coming months, I'll continue also to fight for what the American people care most about--new jobs, higher wages, and faster economy growth...."  [And the lies just keep on coming!]
    "...We also need to give more opportunities to all those construction workers out there who lost their jobs when the housing boom went bust.  We could put them to work right now by giving loans to private companies that want to repair our roads and our bridges and our airports...."  [Instrumental in the last housing boom was the Democrats and the federal government, and Barack Obama has already had the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which was supposed to kick up a lot of "shovel-ready jobs" and which was a sham piece of legislation.  ]
    "...An infrastructure bank would help us put them together...."  [Here, the topic was roads and bridges and the like, and, again, Barack Obama publicly pushed the idea of creating a new federal-government-controlled bank, which I say is a very bad idea.  For years, the country has done well without having a federal-government-controlled bank--roads and bridges and the like have been built and rebuilt.  To me, Barack Obama's only reason to create a federal-government-controlled bank is to have the federal government in more control of the banking system of the country.  Yes, that is bad, bad, bad, especially when the federal government is controlled by "enslavists," such as Marxists and communists like Barack Obama!]

    Wednesday, August 3, 2011 (at a birthday-party event for Barack Obama in Chicago, which Barack Obama used to give a campaign speech):
    "...It's been a long tough journey, but we have made some incredible strides together.  Yes, we have!  But, but the thing that we all have to remember is that, ah, as much good as we've done, prec