T.H.A.T.
(Television History and Trivia)

from

www.hologlobepress.com
 

by

Victor Edward Swanson,
 Publisher
 
 

RULES OF USE

    The material provided on this page is a service of Victor Swanson and The Hologlobe Press.  The material may be used freely by a person, if the person does not use the material for commercial purposes.  The material may be used by persons employed in the media, such as staffers of radio stations, but persons employed in the media must announce that the material has been taken from the Web site of The Hologlobe Press, the main Internet address to which is www.hologlobepress.com.  Of course, the material is provided for fun.
 


- - - T.H.A.T., Edition No. 65 - - -

    I begin with a lesson, which will not be taught to you it seems to me by the staffers of your favorite television newscast--When a politician hurts millions of individuals through legislative actions, such as by creating a health-care system that will be eventually be strictly a government-run health-care system and by taxing the private business industry till it cannot grow, you have a politician who is most ill in the mind and even insane, since a man who hurts millions of individual must like--maybe, enjoy and love--to hurt millions of individuals, and that is a sign of insanity, and you have Barack Obama.

    Again, you have another edition of T.H.A.T., which focuses on television--what you get and what you probably did not get and should have.

    Consider some pieces of logic and quotations that probably were not covered by your favorite television newscast.  If person who is a politician wants to pass a health-care bill as soon as possible, such as in weeks, giving few people the ability to see it, that should be seen as something that is wrong and sneaky and devilish and dangerous, and that person is a bad person.  If a person who is a politician who wants to pass a health-care bill that will ultimately make the health-care system a government monopoly, and any type of monopoly is bad--that person should be seen as a bad person.  If a person who is a politician who attacks people who protest against a health-care bill that is being rushed through the legislative process and who calls such people Nazis and mobsters, that person is bad, and, in truth, is working to hurt people.
    The previous paragraph describes Barack Obama, who--again I show--has an ill mind, given that he has proven that he is willing to hurt people to get his way, which is a defective way, and other politicians exist who are also of the same mindset, though maybe not as insane.
    Here is a statement made by U.S. Representative John Conyers (Democrat related to Michigan) at a National Press Club luncheon on July 27, 2009: "...Ah, ah, I love these members that get up and say, 'Read the bill!"  What good is reading the bill, if it's a thousand pages, and then you don't have, ah, two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?...."  (By the way, John Conyers was referring to the health-care bill of the U.S. House of Representatives.)
    Around the second week in August 2009, regular citizens were protesting at "town hall" meetings hosted by Democrats of the U.S. Congress, and on Wednesday, August 12, 2009, U.S. Representative John Dingell (a Democrat who is one of the U.S. Representatives of Michigan) said what he thought the people protesting reminded him of in relation to the 1960s: "...Well, the last time I had to confront something like this was when I voted for the Civil Rights Bill and my opponent voted against it.  At that time, ah, we had a lot of Ku Klux Klan folks and white supremacists and folks in white sheets and other things running around causing trouble...."
    These are some of the people who are enemies of the United States of America, and to learn about more enemies of the United States of America, you should see my document entitled Enemies of the United States of America: Politicians Who Have Hurt You and Your Family by Voting "Yes" on Bad Federal Bills, which can be reached using this link: Enemies:

    David Brooks, who can be seen from time to time on NewsHour, which is a weeknight program on PBS, professes to be a "conservative," but I say that David Brooks is not, as is not Colin Powell, and like Colin Powell, David Brooks attacks "conservatives" or the type of people who really fight for The U.S. Constitution, and, on Sunday, August 9, 2009, David Brooks made this comment on Meet the Press: "...I hadn't seen the Rush Limbaugh thing.  That is insane.  What he's saying is insane.  But I guess I would say is the first thing is it had been conventional wisdom among the smartest people in Washington is this is such a tough issue you got to do it at a bipartisan basis, and the Obama administration for better or worse decided not to do that.  There was the thing called the Wyden-Bennett Bill that really could've launched bipartisan, so leaders of both parties could have gone out to these town meetings.  They didn't do it.  They chose more or less the Democratic plan, and now all hell is breaking loose, and we're now--and it's not just the crazies among whom we just saw some--but if you take overall poll ratings for health care, they are, people, the American public is now as skeptical as they were when Clinton care collapsed.  So there--it's not just the crazies--there's a real public concern about real issues aside from the stuff Rush...."  This answer came as a reply to a question posed  by the host (David Gregory), and the question was: How does the president take center stage again?

    Something to do: The conservative black who was beaten up around early August 2009 at a "tea party"-type event was Ken Gladney, and the event took place in Melville, Missouri, and you should look up information about Ken Gladney's experience so that you can learn more about what types of people are aligned with Barack Obama, who is a communist thug.

    Let us take a money break.  I do not care what other people make for a living, but Barack Obama does, and, for example, Barack Obama has attacked doctors for what they make, and Barack Obama has attacked people who work on Wall Street for what they make, and Barack Obama has attacked car executives for what they make (he has a "pay czar" in his administration and some forty more czars, who do not have to answer to the Legislative and Judicial Branches of the U.S. government), and one reason that Barack Obama has attacked people for what they make is--I say--he is an egomaniac and megalomaniac, who cannot have other persons having more power or making more money than he does (he has to be "king").  The edition of TV Guide for August 10-22, 2009 (page 24 through 27) presented information about actors and what pay that the actors receive, such as Keifer Sutherland (who makes about $550,000 per episode for working on 24), Tina Fey (who makes about $300,000 per episode for 30 Rock and who supports Barack Obama), David Letterman (who makes about $32,000,000 a year for his late-night talk show and who is a big supporter of Barack Obama, the communist), and Keith Obermann (who makes about $7,500,000 a year for his MSNBC talk show and who is a big, big supporter of Barack Obama).  I wonder what the people listed in the article, which was entitled "Who Make$ What," think of Barack Obama's tax policies--Tax the rich.  (Barack Obama seems to think that taxing the rich will make everyone else (the non-rich) better and seems to think that the tax money can support the tremendous mess that is his proposed health-care plan.   The so-called "rich" have not anywhere enough to cover the health-care mess of trillions of dollars.  But Barack Obama is a crap of a man.)  Hide your money, stars!  Barack is coming!  (Were not the Jewish actors and performers attacked by Adolph Hitler in the 1930s in Germany?)

    Announcement (again): Since national broadcast television networks do a poor job of covering information about many important topics, I will try to take up the work of filling in some of the holes.  I urge you to see www.saveourhealthcarenow.com and www.noperformancetax.org, because they have important information about the country.  The former has information about the health-care industry in the United States of America, and you should and must see it, and you are urged to sign the petition that exists there, and the latter has information about a proposed tax system related to radio stations and music, and the latter will show you what nonsense that U.S. Representative John Conyers (a Democrat of Michigan) is trying to push on the country.

    On Tuesday, August 25, 2009, a well-known killer died, and that killer was U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy, who had let a woman die in a vehicle that he had driven in to water near Chappaquiddick Island, Massachusetts, in 1969 and who had talked down the U.S. military effort  in Vietnam in the 1960s-1970s and the U.S. military effort in Iraq in the early 2000s, which I can argue well led to the death of American soldiers, and Edward Kennedy (who was also known for his "waitress sandwich" behavior, which you can look up on the Internet or see in a story in Gentlemen's Quarterly in 1990 that was written by Michael Kelly), was involved in working to hurt U.S. security in the 1980s, and I show this information--since your favorite television newscast probably did not and probably never will--so that you are well aware of what Edward Kennedy was (and how bad and dangerous many television media outlets in the country are, and I show the information by repeating how Mark Levin delivered the information on The Mark Levin Show (a nationally syndicated radio program) on Thursday, August 27, 2009 (and you should see I provide the information as a way to promote your listening to The Mark Levin Show, either on radio or through the Internet).  Some of the opening lines are text by Steve Gilbert of Sweetness & Light (sweetness-light.com), which originally posted the information focusing on a KGB letter on December 31, 2006, which was written by V. Chebrikov to Y.V. Andropov.  And here is what Mark Levin delivered (and he did not read the letter exactly at a few spots, but I put all the material in quotations, and you will see Mark Levin made some asides while reading the letter, and I made some slight adjustments in punctuation because of how Mark Levin read and spoke):
    "...the details of Ted Kennedy's offer to the Soviet Union that was first posted on sweetnessoflife, as I recall, back in December '06.  'This letter,' as he [Steve Gilbert of Sweetness & Life] writes, 'which details Senator Edward Kennedy's offer to help the Soviet Union defeat Reagan's [U.S. President Ronald Reagan's] efforts to build up the nuclear deterrent in Europe was unearthed by a Times of London reporter in the 1990s after the KGB files were opened.  It got little or no attention until the publication of Paul Kengor's book The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism.  But even then the actual text of the letter has gotten short shrift.'  And you won't find this on MSLSD [Mark Levin's description of MSNBC] because Media Matters writes their scripts and Media Matters won't talk about it.  And you won't find it on ABC and NBC and CBS and CNN and MSLSD either.  Why?  Because that's not media--their appendages of the Democrat Party.  So I'll read it to you and we will link to it on marklevinshow.com.  The letter at the top says 'Special Importance.  Committee State Security of the U.S.S.R.  Five, fourteen, 1983. Moscow.  By Comrade Y.V. Andropov [It should have been V. Chebrikov, which Mark Levin misunderstood].  Regarding Senator Kennedy's request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party, Comrade Y.V. Andropov.  On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy's close friend and trusted confident J. Tunney was in Moscow.'  Now, Tunney was a former Senator from California.  He was a one-termer, I believe.  'The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message through' confidant to [Mark Levin misspoke] 'confidential contacts, to the Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.  Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, were [is] very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations.  Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous.  The main reason for this is Reagan's belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.'  By the way, you won't hear this on the Ron Reagan show [the son of Ronald Reagan] on Air America.  'According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President's refusal to engage any modification on his politics.  He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement in the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity.  For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline.  The White House has portrayed this in the media as the "success of Reaganomics."  Naturally, not everything in the province of  economics has gone according to Reagan's plan.  A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the northeastern states.'  I wonder if they had Paul Krugman.  'Foresee certain hidden tendencies that may [many] bring about a new economic crisis in the United States.  This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign in 1984, which would benefit the Democratic Party.  Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.  The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations.  These issues, according to the senator.'  That would be Senator Ted Kennedy.  'Will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.  The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States.  The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth.'  What the hell does that mean?  He's willing to accept 'preparations' for whom?  'In political and influential circles in the country, including within Congress, the resistance to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.  However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak.  Reagan's adversaries are divided and the presentations that they make are still fully effective.  Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda.  In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the US and the USSR are non constructive,   Reagan will.'  I'm just reading as written.  'Grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic.'  Broken English.  'At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted.  Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans to not read serious newspapers or periodicals.'  Teubbbbs (Mark Levin flapped his lips).  Unlike Pravda, TAS, I guess.  'Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following.'  Now, listen to this!  Kennedy is advising the top communist of the world in the Soviet Union!  Kennedy advises!  'It would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people.  In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov.   Number one.  Kennedy asks [Y.V.] Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year.  The main purpose of the meeting, according the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the US.'  So Kennedy wants to advises the communist dictator in the Soviet Union of what to say when he meets with Reagan at these public appearances.  'He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England's Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand, in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.  If his proposals will be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.  Kennedy thinks the benefits of the meeting with [Y.V.] Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for instance Mark Hatfield.'  Yeah, Hatfield of Oregon.  May he rest in peace, the jerk!  'Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA.  In March of '82, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the US and the USSR and published a book on the theme as well.'  By the way, if we had done that, ladies and gentlemen, the Soviet Union would not have fallen, and hundreds of millions of people would still be imprisoned behind the Iron Curtain.  'Number two.  Kennedy believes that, in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with [Y.V.] Andropov in the USA.  A direct appeal by the Secretary General to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country.  The senator is convinced this would.'  Excuse me (it seemed Mark Levin had to clear his throat).  'Receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method, of mass media and information.'  Kennedy knew our media very well.  They worked for him.  And there's more!  And there's more!  But can you imagine--can you imagine, when Reagan is trying to topple the Soviet Union, he's trying to strengthen the coallesion the coalition to do that, that we have Kennedy going around his back to the Soviets and to others, advising them on P.R. strategy and substantive strategy to counter the President of the United States.  This is the same Kennedy who undermined the war effort in Vietnam and who the communist, there, slaughtering millions of people--Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, elsewhere--took great solace in what Kennedy was doing and saying, and his sidekick John Kerry.  The same Kennedy who during the Iraq War made every effort to undermine our efforts there.  These were the policies, these were the activities, among many others of Ted Kennedy.  You won't hear this on MSNBC.  You won't hear it from most of the morning back benchers, who lecture us with their fourteen listeners--'Oh, I'm just so glad, these screaming right-wingers kept this under their hats, you know, because we at MSNBC, we don't like this sort of thing.'  No, they scream like hell all the time!  But this in part is what Kennedy did.  Also in 1965, when Medicare and Medicaid were being debated during the Great Society, when the Democrats controlled everything, Kennedy was also the driving force, inserting language in a new immigration bill that instituted 'chain migration.'  He insisted then--'It won't change the demographs of America.  It won't change the ethnicity of America.  It won't change America in any way.  But it's the fair thing to do.  We cannot keep having these Europeans come in front of the line, Germans, Irish, British, so forth.  No.  No.  We've got to be fair.  Everybody can come in.'  Nobody really noticed.  Nobody really paid attention.  Because then, as now, so much legislation was being passed so fast, with all kinds of technical amendments and sort forth, that nobody had any idea what he was doing.  The guy that spoke out, by the way, was William Miller, who'd been the vice presidential candidate--congressman from New York--with Barry Goldwater's campaign...."

    Now, let me add a bit more text of the Soviet Union letter, and this material follows up on the sentence that ends with "...mass media and information."  Here is the more; "If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for an interview.  Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Rule and television columnists Walter Cronkite and Barbara Walters could visit Moscow.  The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.  Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized.  They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military terms...."  The letter is signed at the end: "President of the committee.  V. Chebrikov."

    By the way, after Edward Kennedy died, many television media news entities did a lot of reports about Edward (Teddy) Kennedy, avoiding the much that was bad about Edward Kennedy, and here is a reminder of how bad many in the television media are today, and what you have is a statement made by Chris Matthews on Today (on NBC-TV) on Wednesday, August 26, 2009: "...He wanted to be his brother's brother, and then he turned that torch over last year to Barack Obama.  And the great thing about the Kennedys is they always grew as a family.  They tended to get better as they got older.  This family got better.  The Kennedy commitment to end Civil Rights was almost accidental.  It began because of history--'63 and Martin Luther King's march.  By Bobby, it became passion.  By Teddy, it became real.  And then Teddy turns it over to the first African-American and says, 'You've got the ball.'  Amazing history!  Barack's now the last brother."

    On Friday, August 28, 2009, Rush Limbaugh presented material from a recent BBC radio program heard in Washington, D.C., in which Ed Klein (The New York Times) talked about Edward Kennedy making jokes at his own expense: "...I don't know if you know this or not.  But one of his favorite topics of humor was indeed Chappaqueddick itself.  And he would ask people--Have you heard any new jokes about Chappaqueddick?  That is just the most 'mazing thing.  It, not that he didn't feel remorse about the death of Mary Jo Kopechne, but that he still always saw, ah, the other side of everything and the ridiculous side...."

    Public Service Announcement: If you wish to avoid giving a donation to nonprofit groups that support "manmade global warming" legislation or "manmade climate-change" legislation, such as the very bad American Clean Energy and Security Act (which is also known as the Waxman-Markey Bill), give to something better--consider making donations to the Heritage Foundation and the Landmark Legal Foundation, which are organizations that support The U.S. Constitution and are working to defeat Barack Obama's plans to take over the country.   (You should see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached through this link: Carbon.)

    Announcement for the novice: To get useful news, go to Fox News Channel, WorldNetDaily.com, "The Drudge Report," and CNS News (which is on the Internet and which was launched on June 16, 1998), since the entities do not blindly support Barack Obama, as do CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV (to learn about bad journalism, you might tune in to CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV from time to time to see how they differ from the Fox News Channel and those mentioned with it in presenting political stories and events, and you should discover CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV avoid covering things that make Barack Obama look bad or show his true nature, which could harm you).  If you are unclear of my intentions, I say in different words that you should boycott CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV and hope they lose more ratings and advertising revenues, since they are expendable, and it is time for you to find the guts to be mean and heartless and cancel them--since they are hurting you.

    On August 25, 2009, John McCain (who is a U.S. Senator related to Arizona) was at a town hall forum in Sun City, Arizona, and he showed he yet has to understand how dangerous Barack Obama is (John McCain had not understood the dangerousness of Barack Obama in 2008 and had not fought sternly Barack Obama in any of the presidential debates as John McCain should have), and to see dialogue from the meeting, you should see the "John McCain" section of my document entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America, a link to which exists at the end of this document.

     Advertisement (a sustainer): Once again, I present an advertisement, which is a free advertisement, and what it leads to is something that is not necessarily free, since freedom does have a price.  Mark R. Levin of The Mark Levin Show (a nationally syndicated radio show) had his latest book released in March 2009, and it is called Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto, and the focus of the book is on the individual, such as you, who is losing rights in the country because of government policies, especially those that have been pushed through by left-leaning politicians--Barack Obama, Democrats, Marxists, and such.  The book is a best-seller, though the main media outlets have not given Mark R. Levin any publicity, as they do to so many other books.  Get the book!

    Public Service Announcement: Rules for Radicals, which is a book put together by Saul Alinsky (a communist) about 35 years ago, is a book that Barack Obama is very familiar with and follows, and so you wonder what you can do in relation to Barack Obama, I say, "Well, see my document entitled Rules of a Radical Destroyer: The Barack Obama Case, which can be reached though this link: Radical."

    It seems to me the health-care debate in the country is going to be even more heated in the days to come, and protesters of the health-care bills will probably continue to be called "angry mobs," "right-wing radicals" (though really it is "left-wing" people who are really radicals, since they dislike The U.S. Constitution, are socialists or communists, et cetera), and un-American, even by Barack Obama.  The episode entitled "A Change of Mind" of the 1960s television series entitled The Prisoner (which featured Patrick McGoohan as Number 6) dealt with a medical issue--social conversion.  And from the episode of The Prisoner entitled "A Change of Mind," there is this dialogue presented by an announcer over the Village announcement system; "Your attention please.  Here is an important announcement.  Number 6 has been declared Unmutual until further notice.  Any unsocial incident involving Number 6 should be reported immediately to the Appeals Sub-committee.  Thank you for your attention."  I again urge you to buy the box set of The Prisoner and watch it and show all the episodes to children.

    Let me remind you of some text that I presented in the previous edition of T.H.A.T.  "My research has convinced me that Barack Obama's wish to switch to a federal-government-run health-care system would be a bad idea, since such systems are failing in such countries as Canada and England (to see the problems with the health-care system in the U.K., you should see the many real newspaper articles and such that are available through liberty-page.com (I talked about the topic more fully in Michigan Travel Tips #60, which can be reached at this link: Travel #60)).  To date, I have yet to see a good and long and detailed television program about the health-care system in the U.K. presented on MSNBC, CNN. NBC-TV, CBS-TV, or ABC-TV, which would really show how the government-run health-care system in the U.K. is falling apart and how individuals, especially the elderly, are being treated terribly."

    Reminder: Since late 2008, I have put within editions of Michigan Travel Tips information about "green technology," "global warming" stuff, and "climate change" stuff, and to get to the catalog for all the Michigan Travel Tips publications, use this link: Travel.

    In the previous edition of T.H.A.T., I noted that, "on August 4, 2009, Barack Obama sent out a message to his close supporters in the country, such as ACORN-type people and Organizing for America-type people, to send information (to flag@whitehouse.org) about people who send out e-mail messages or have other materials on the Internet that dispute Barack Obama's proposed health-care legislation (or health-insurance legislation) that is being pushed hard through the U.S. Congress"  By Monday, August 17, 2009, the place had been shut down it seems, but, of course, the data base of reported people was probably not destroyed, and that means the information within the database could yet be used by Barack Obama.  I said in the previous edition of T.H.A.T. that "...it must be pointed out, since Barack Obama created such a list of enemies, Barack Obama has intentions of using the list for something, and that something cannot be for good and righteous reasons."

    And so we get to a television topic sort of--it is really an adult topic for guys.  On the cover of TV Guide for August 24-September 6, 2009, there is a photograph of two performers in the new Melrose Place series--Laura Leighton and Ashlee Simpson-Wentz.  The two gals are also shown in photographs within the edition of TV Guide.  To me, they look non-attractive, each being thin with no curves or breasts, and, in the next edition of T.H.A.T., I will have more on the subject of thin gals on television or over-thin gals on television.  Till you see the next edition of T.H.A.T., you should see the photograph of Katie Cassidy and a guy on page 25.  Guys, look at Katie Cassidy's thighs in the photograph.  Is that what they are trying to sell to real guys as attractive?  Ugh!  (I will go look at Ema Hayasaka's thighs instead.  Guys, check her out on the Internet.)

    And your favorite television newscast will not provide this information--for information about some "tea parties," you should see teapartyexpress.org.

     A final reminder: Remember to tell your children and grandchildren that they should never pledge to be a "servant to Obama" or a servant to any president, which was a topic in T.H.A.T. #58, and remember to tell them to not blindly "believe" in leaders, and that is a lesson in this edition of T.H.A.T., as it was in the past and will be in the future.  By the way, remember, in the "Presidential Video," which is one topic of T.H.A.T. #58, one male says, "I pledge to be of service to Barack Obama."; one female says, "I pledge to be a servant to our president."
 

Stay well!

Vic
 

    P.S. #1: The telephone number of the U.S. Congressional Switchboard is: 1-202-224-3121.  (Use it to fight against the creation of a national-health-care system, especially a system pushed through law by a defective thinker, a man who has created nothing, and a man whose history is mostly filled with tearing things down, a man who continually puts down the U.S.A.--Barack Obama.  By the way, one of the more recent events in which he put down the entire business community of the country took place on Wednesday May 13, 2009, and you should see the second entry for Wednesday, May 13, 2009, in the document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama).

    P.S. #2: Here is a logic puzzle and a special commentary piece.  Barack Obama has never released his school records, such as college or university records.  I wonder if his college or university records have medical-type reports, such as evaluations about his persona or mind.  I argue Barack Obama is insane.  Would not an insane man to get even with the medical community, such as that that might have reported in college or university reports that he has an ill mind, create a national-health-care system that would harm the medical community?  Barack Obama has already shown that he is willing to hurt millions of people, as can be seen in information provided in some of my documents.
 

copyright c. 2009
Date published: September 10, 2009

The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 20551
Ferndale, Michigan  48220-0551
The United States of America

To see the next edition of T.H.A.T.,
    click on: T.H.A.T. #66.
To see the previous edition of T.H.A.T.,
    click on: T.H.A.T. #64.
To see the catalog page for T.H.A.T. editions,
    click on: T.H.A.T..
To see information about the news business in
    the country and its failures and its betrayal of
    the American public, click on: T.H.A.T. #55.
To go to the main page of The Hologlobe Press,
    click on: www.hologlobepress.com.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled THOUGHTS AND  STATEMENTS
     ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF
    AMERICA for the individual woman and the
    individual man, which can be reached by
    hitting this link: Thoughts.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF
    LOGIC for the individual woman and the
    individual man, which can be reached by
    hitting this link: Logic.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman
    and the Individual Man in the United States of
    America, which can be reached by hitting this
    link: Lessons.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations
    of Barack Obama, which can be reached at
    this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the document
    about censorship, Fairness?: A Guide for the
    Individual Woman and the Individual Man
    in the United States of America, which can be
    reached at this link: Fairness.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure:
    The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be
    reached at this link: Health.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled  A Collection of Words--Just Words--
    That Show Dangerous People, which can be
    reached through this link: Words.

Keep in mind: T.H.A.T. documents and Michigan
    Travel Tips documents published since the middle
    of 2008 contain more quotations and statements
    of Barack Obama's that you should see.  To see
    the editions of Michigan Travel Tips, you should
    go to the catalog page, which can be reached by
    hitting this link: Travel.
 


###