(Television History and Trivia)




Victor Edward Swanson,


    The material provided on this page is a service of Victor Swanson and The Hologlobe Press.  The material may be used freely by a person, if the person does not use the material for commercial purposes.  The material may be used by persons employed in the media, such as staffers of radio stations, but persons employed in the media must announce that the material has been taken from the Web site of The Hologlobe Press, the main Internet address to which is www.hologlobepress.com.  Of course, the material is provided for fun or to teach.

- - - T.H.A.T., Edition No. 188 - - -

    Okay.  Here is another edition of Television History and Trivia.  It is loaded with information about highly rotten people or highly rotten events tied to television, but I start out the edition with some fun information.  On November 21, 2019, the third version of a classic-movies channel showed up on Channel 14.6 of the Detroit area.  The first version of the channel was kind of fun, and it was called, for instance, INS, and the second version of the channel was kind of crappy.  The new version is passable (so far).  One disadvantage of the new version, which I call "Television Drive-in" (based on the graphics shown on the screen at breaks), is it shows too much stuff about heading to the snack bar or refreshment stand to get Pepsi or hot dogs or candy.  The channel could still show that stuff--though not so much--and show some very old public-domain cartoons as filler.  On November 21, 2019, two of the movie presentations were Foreign Intrigue (featuring Robert Mitchum) and A Shriek in the Night (featuring Ginger Rogers).  I shall regularly be tuning in to "Television Drive-In" when I am in the Detroit area to see what is showing, such as a Charlie Chan movie maybe.  And that is that!

    Recent editions of Television History and Trivia have reported on some very bad television programs or events, such as several Democratic Party presidential debates, and this edition of Television History and Trivia reports on really rotten television broadcast events of the past month, and the events were hearings held by U.S. House of Representatives.  Two events, which were related to the Committee on Intelligence of the U.S. House of Representatives, took place on Wednesday, November 13, 2019 (starting at 10:00 a.m.) and on Friday, November 15, 2019. (starting at 9:00 a.m.).  It must be remembered there had been about six weeks of closed-door hearings held by the Committee on Intelligence, guided along by Chairman Adam Schiff, before the live hearings were held, and I report, here, the so-called original whistleblower related to the telephone conversation of July 25, 2019, between U.S. President Donald Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky (of Ukraine), which the so-called original whistleblower had not heard, was not interviewed during the two live hearings, so the American people did not get to hear from the so-called original whistleblower and determine what they thought about the person (who is known to be Eric Ciaramella).  U.S. Representative Adam Schiff (a Democrat related to California) opened the hearing of Wednesday, November 13, 2019, with his comments, and, by the way, during the roughly day-long event, Adam Schiff would push out the idea that U.S. President Donald Trump was guilty of bribery, and then a Representative Devin Nunes (a Republican related to California) got to present thoughts, and Representative Devin Nunes showed up a lot of the nonsense of things related to the so-called investigation of U.S. President Donald Trump.  Incidentally, during Adam Schiff's time speaking, Adam Schiff pushed out such things as Donald Trump is working for Russia, and Adam Schiff pushed out the idea that Donald Trump is impeding or obstructing the U.S. Congress from investigating Donald Trump's actions and such, and Adam Schiff brought up history related to Benjamin Franklin and Benjamin Franklin's theme about what the country was made to be--and the thought from Mr. Franklin was a democracy if you can keep it--and, yet, Adam Schiff was, has been, and is involved in anti-honorable actions or dishonorable actions (at least), if not anti-American actions and anti-United States Constitution actions, such as by lying big-time on September 26, 2019, during the testimony event on television of Joseph Maguire (the Acting Director of National Intelligence), which is part of the effort to tell the crap that U.S. President Donald Trump should be impeached, which is the theme of the communists and the socialists of the country, especially those in the U.S. Congress (at least the members of the Democratic Party) [Note: You are urged to see T.H.A.T. #186 to learn about the event of September 26, 2019, and the document can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #186 link.].  The first witness or person testifying at the hearing on Wednesday, November 13, 2019, was William Taylor, an ambassador, who had had no direct knowledge of the telephone call of July 25, 2019 [Note: By the way, William Taylor has never met U.S. President Donald Trump.], and, of course, William Taylor was supposed to be, in essence, the star witness or at least one of the star witnesses for the day, and the other main witness was George Kent, an ambassador.  When U.S. Representative Jim Jordan (a Republican related to Ohio) was able to do actual questioning, U.S. Representative Jim Jordan (a Republican related to Ohio) made it clear that there was no linkage about "security assistance dollars" (to the Ukraine) in relation to three meetings with the new president of Ukraine (Volodymyr Zelensky) by Mr. William Taylor and others, and Mr. Taylor agreed with that assessment, and Jim Jordan reported that President Volodymyr Zelensky did nothing in public to note that there was going to be an investigation of, for instance, Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden for actions in Ukraine, and U.S. Representative Jim Jordan passed along these ideas clearly in relation to Mr. Taylor's knowledge about the telephone call.  And Jim Jordan brought up the subject of Mr. Gordon Sondland (an ambassador) and some past testimony by Mr. Gorgon Sondland (an addendum, particularly "point number two" and more particularly "second sentence"), and Jim Jordan said, for instance--"...Let me read it one more time.  'Ambassador Taylor recalls that Mr. Morrison told Ambassador Taylor that I told Mr. Morrison that I conveyed this message to Mr. Yermak on September 15, 2019, in connection with Vice President Pence's visit to Warsaw and a meeting with President Zelensky.'  We got six people having four conversations in one sentence, and you just told me this is where you got your current understanding.  Which, I mean.  Even though you had three opportunities with President Zelensky for him to tell you--'You know what?  We are going to do these investigations to get the aid.'  Didn't tell you three different times!  Never makes an announcement!  Never Tweets about it.  Never does an CNN interview!  Ambassador, you weren't on the call, were you?  You didn't listen in on President Trump and President Zelensky's call.'..."  Representative Jim Jordan showed that William Taylor had no useful and direct information about anything bad done by U.S. President Donald Trump.  Also on the day, U.S. Representative John Radcliffe (a Republican related to Texas), while questioning Mr. Taylor and Mr. Kent, said--"So, ah, in this impeachment hearing today--where we impeach presidents for treason or bribery or other high crimes--where is the impeachable offense in that call?  Are either of you here today to assert there was an impeachable offense in that call?"  There were two seconds of silence.  Then, Representative John Radcliffe said: "Shout it out!  Anyone.".  Then, there were about three seconds of silence, and then Mr. Taylor began to speak, and, ultimately, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Kent could not report that there was something impeachable about the telephone call of July 25, 2019.  On Friday, November 15, 2019, Marie Yovanovitch was the first person to be interviewed, being it seems a star witness to something important, but she had had no association with the telephone call of July 25, 2019, and, in fact, she had been removed from her ambassadorship in May 2019, and she could not present any direct testimony about anything, and, in essence, her testimony was a collage of emotions focusing on her being fired by U.S. President Donald Trump.  By the way, in December 2008, the media entities, even the communistic-based entities, such as The Washington Post (Kessler, Glenn.  "Obama Gives Political Ambassadors Their Pink Slips."  The Washington Post, 3 December 2008, 10:04 a.m. EDT), reported that incoming U.S. president Barack Hussein Obama had announced that all ambassadors (which had not been appointed by Barack Hussein Obama) had to vacate their positions by January 20, 2009, and it was noted that Barack Hussein Obama was going to appoint all new ambassadors, which included those for such places as England and France.  During the testimony by Marie Yovanovitch, Marie Yovanovitch pushed out the idea that the department is currently "being hollowed out", which was useless information, given, for instance, U.S. presidents get to hire and fire ambassadors [Note: I have shown Barack Hussein Obama fired ambassadors, and, for one, the press did not put down Barack Hussein Obama for firing the ambassadors.].  During the two days of the television events, I came up with thoughts about how many media people showed their rottenness.  For instance, on Wednesday, November 13, 2019, Lester Holt of NBC News said, while on NBC-TV, that the hearing stuff was "The Constitution at work", which is a defective thought, since, for one, the hearing was not true impeachment procedure as set down in The United States Constitution, and good and smart persons understood the event was a public campaign to at least ruin the reputation of U.S. President Donald Trump so that he might lose favor in the minds of some voters and not be reelected as the U.S. president. [Note: On Wednesday, November 13, 2019, I went to the website for some of the Detroit-area television stations, and I saw misinformation, such as from Channel 4.1, (WDIV-TV), which noted--"LIVE COVERAGE: U.S. House holds first Trump impeachment hearings", though the event was not going to be a legal and true "impeachment" stuff, so, for example, WDIV-TV once again passed along crap.].  And for instance, on Friday, November 15, 2019, Chuck Todd (a hard-line socialist at least), who works for NBC News, pushed out while on NBC-TV the idea that we have a "constitutional crisis", and I report that his thoughts are bullshit, and I also was exposed to Chris Wallace (of Fox News Channel) pushing out nonsense, hinting that a person has "no pulse" if the person was not moved by the testimony given by Marie Yovanovitch, and Chris Wallace's making the statement shows he was trying to get people to be sympathetic toward Marie Yovanovitch, which--I say--is a bunch of bullshit.  I must pass along the idea that Marie Yovanovitch has been tied to U.S. Department of State" jobs for a number of years, such as years when Hillary Clinton was the U.S. Secretary of State, when Hillary Clinton was involved in what good people know were criminal actions related to computer servers, and when the "Benghazi Killings Scandal" took place, which was during the time of Barack Hussein Obama as the U.S. president.  Oh, I learned, during the hearing of Friday, November 15, 2019, Marie Yovanovitch never talked with U.S. President Donald Trump at any time in 2019, while Maria was an ambassador.  Hold it!  On Friday, November 15, 2019, I was reminded by Rush Limbaugh (of The Rush Limbaugh Program, a nationally syndicated radio show) that the President Volodymyr Zelensky had told U.S. President Donald Trump that Marie Yovanovitch was sympathetic to the previous president of Ukraine, and history shows that the previous president of Ukraine was corrupt.   The following week, there were more live interviews related to the Committee on Intelligence of the U.S. House of Representatives for the American public to see on television, and the interviews again offered no real useful information--hearsay was the norm.  On November 20, 2019, Gordon Sondland was the main witness in the morning, and Laura Cooper and Dave Hale were witnesses in the afternoon, and some information spoken by Gordon Sondland was--"I believe I just asked him [Donald Trump] an open-ended question, Mr. Chairman.  'What do you want from Ukraine?  I keep hearing all these different ideas of theories and this and that.  What do you want?'  And it was a very short abrupt conversation.  He [Donald Trump] was not in a good mood.  And he just said--'I want nothing.  I want nothing.  I want no quid pro quo.  Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.'  Something to that affect.".  In essence, the material from Gordon Sondland--which was not to the benefit of Adam Schiff and his associates--helped show up as baseless the idea that Donald Trump had done something bad in relation to the Ukraine, and, for instance, such other witnesses of the week as Laura Cooper, David Hale, Kurt Volker, and Tim Morrison, saying little of value, received little notice from the press that was working in collusion with the Democrats.  In essence, the five days of live interviews were a sham filled with emotions and feelings and hearsay and guesses from those interviewed, and it was five days of wasted television time.  I have to report that the hearings did not bring up the point that the Ukraine (under the previous president (Viktor Yanukovych) before Mr. Zelensky) worked against getting Donald Trump elected to the office of the presidency of the United States of America in 2016 and the previous president did try to help the Hillary Clinton campaign [Vogel, Kenneth P., and David Stern.  "Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire."  politico.com, 11 January 2017, 05:05 a.m. EST.], and that idea is tied to the idea that Donald Trump was aware in 2019 that the Ukraine may not be a real ally to the United States of America (while he was going to be the U.S. president) and might not deserve to be given U.S. aid in the form of money [Note: A U.S. president is able to block aid to a country, if it is deemed the country that might get aid is not worthy of the aid, and that is law.].  In addition, the live hearings--under control of Adam Schiff and the Democrats--did not bring up a quotation from President Zelensky (spoken in the second telephone call with U.S. President Donald Trump)--"...Her [Marie Yovanovitch's] attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous president, and she was on his side....".  And, by the way, when Adam Schiff was interviewing Marie Yovanovitch, Adam Schiff brought out the idea that U.S. President Donald Trump was then--in essence, at the moment--tweeting information that was against her, and Adam Schiff tried to push out the idea that Donald Trump was being involved in witness intimidation, and at that time or moment, Marie Yovanovitch--unable to know was was going on on the Internet--pushed out the idea that Donald Trump's action were "very intimidating".  More bad television showed up on Tuesday, December 3, 2019, and, on that day, news networks broadcast a press conference headed by U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, who announced the release of an impeachment-inquiry document that ran about 300 pages.  Adam Schiff put forth the idea that putting the document together was an "enormous task".  In addition, Adam Schiff put forth other crap, such as "...This report chronicles a scheme by the President of the United States [Donald Trump] to coerce an ally, ah, Ukraine, ah, that is at war with an adversary, Russia, into doing the plesiden, president's political dirty work.  Ah, it involves a scheme in which Donald Trump withheld official acts, a White House meeting as well as hundreds of millions of dollars of needed military assistance in order to compel that power to deliver two investigations that he believed would assist his reelection campaign....".  Stop!  Adam Schiff was once again pushing lies.  The aid in the form of money was released before the date that had been set to be the delivery date by the U.S. Congress.  In addition, no investigations had been held by President Zelensky's government before the aid in the form of money was released by the United States of America to Ukraine.  Keep in mind--A president of the United States of America has the power to not release money if it is felt the country that would receive the money would be acting against the United States of America, and the president of the United States of America has the power to get investigations set up with Ukraine by Ukraine officials because of a treaty between the United States of America and Ukraine.  Also, Adam Schiff pushed out--"...At the same time, there was something President Trump desperately wanted and believed he needed, and that was an investigation that would damage the rival that he feared apparently the most in Joe Biden, as well as a investigation into a debunked conspiracy theory that it was Ukraine--not Russia--that interfered in our last election....".  Stop!  It was more crap from Adam Schiff, who was selling the idea that the theory was a Russian narrative.  Yet, there is the Politico article of January 2017 [Vogel, Kenneth P., and David Stern.  "Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire."  politico.com, 11 January 2017, 05:05 am. EST.] to discredit Adam Schiff.  Hold it!  Remember--What was the interference in the United States of America election, given proof shows no votes were changed by Russia or Ukraine in the election in the United States of America?  To me, the interference was basically advertising (if that).  Adam Schiff also pushed out--"...That scheme, however, was discovered, ah, because--among other things--a courageous person stepped forward and blew the whistle....".  Stop!  The so-called whistleblower--Eric Ciaramella--did not hear the telephone call of July 25, 2019, the transcript of which has been released to the public and which shows nothing bad.  Why has not the whistleblower testified in public to help the American people understand what the whistleblower is?  That is it!  I stop here with the Adam Schiff sham television event of December 3, 2019, which was also used, for example, to sell the crappy idea that Donald Trump does not act with the interests of the American people at heart.  Then on December 4, 2019, the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, headed by Jerrold Nadler (a Democrat related to New York), had a hearing with four professors about impeachment, and the four professors were Noah Feldman (of Harvard Law School), Michael Gerhardt (of the University of North Carolina), Pamela Karlan (of Stanford Law School), and Jonathan Turley (of George Washington University), and the four persons had nothing in the way of fact to offer in relation to, for example, the telephone call of July 25, 2019, and they could only add opinions and feelings to, for example, theoretical situations in questions, and the event was nothing but more sham television as a rule to sell images and fluff, but Jonathan Turley did put a damper on the event, such as by sort of putting down some things, especially in relation to proving "bribery"* and "obstruction of justice"** [Note: While excluding Jonathan Turley, who is a "liberal law professor and long-time civil libertarian" ["Jonathan Turley."  Wikipedia, 4 December 2019.], for the moment, I report that three of the persons are clearly anti-United States Constitution people, being socialists or communists, and they cannot be trusted.  For instance, Wikipedia notes that Pamela Karlan is a "liberal legal scholar" and a "snarky, bisexual, Jewish woman" ["Pamela S. Karlan.  Wikipedia, 4 December 2019.], and the Harvard Law School, at which Noah Feldman so-called teaches, is a communistic-socialistic entity, where, for instance, Barack Hussein Obama spent time.  I note that the three persons are three freaks, especially Pamela Karlan.]  The United States of America is not a "communistic republic," and yet on December 4, 2019, communistic Pamela Karlan pushed out this bullshit, in relation to talking about reading all the transcripts of the live hearings--"...So I'm insulted by the suggestion that as a law professor I don't care about those facts.  But everything I read on those occasions tells me that when President Trump invited--indeed demanded--foreign involvement in our upcoming election, he struck at the very heart of what makes this a republic to which we pledge allegiance....".  Pamela Karlan pushed a lie, given she stands for and it seems to me pledges allegiance to communism and socialism and progressivism, being a "liberal," and "liberal" (in her terms) means communist and socialist and progressive.  I have to add that the event of December 4, 2019, was more "monkey trial" bits, in which, for instance, Pamela Karlan, while always speaking in an angry format, pushed forth useless historical notes and feelings and even wrong information, and the witnesses--so-called "testifying"--tried to stand up for The United States Constitution as something that they feel is great, and Noah Feldman pushed out the idea that Donald Trump abused his power, saying "...On the basis of the testimony and the evidence before the House, President Trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by corruptly abusing the office of the presidency...." [Note: The sentence structure is defective, by the way, lacking the correct subject.], and Michael Gerhardt also pushed out the idea that Donald Trump abused his office, saying, "...An, and I just, ah, wanna stress that, if this--what, if what we're talkin' about is not impeachable, then nothing is impeachable.  This is precisely the misconduct that the Framers created a constitution, included impeachment, to protect against....", and a general theme of the television event--a staged event--was Donald Trump did not put the interests of the nation first, though there were no facts presented to prove the push.  Then, on Thursday, December 5, 2019, U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi (a Democrat related to California and the head of the U.S. House of Representatives) was on television and in public, commenting about the idea that the impeachment process seems to be going so fast now--"...This has been a couple of years--two-and-a-half--since the, ah, initial investigation of the U.S., the Russian involvement in America's election, which started much of this and led to other things.  This isn't about Ukraine.  This is about Russia, who benefitted by our withholding, withholding of that military assistance.  Russia!  This is about Russia!  And sometimes people say--'Well, I don't know about Ukraine, I don't know that much about Ukraine.'  Well, our adversary is Russia!  All roads lead to Putin!'....".  Hold it!  During the time of Barack Hussein Obama as the U.S. president, Hillary Clinton was involved in the "Uranium One Scandal," which resulted in Russia getting control of some U.S. uranium, and during the time of Barack Hussein Obama as the U.S. president, Russia took over a part of Ukraine, and where was Barack Hussein Obama (a communist, like the leaders of Russia) during these times to fight against Russia if Russia is the adversary?  Nancy Pelosi pushed more crap about the impeachment theme related to Donald Trump, and Nancy Pelosi showed the history impeachment process wish by Democrats goes back way before Donald Trump could have even done anything as a president, such as way back before the famous telephone call of July 25, 2019.  Then on Monday, December 9, 2019, even more live testimony was given before the American public, pushed out by the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, and, for instance, Daniel Goldman (a "democratic counsel") was a so-called witness in the morning, and Daniel Goldman pushed out such ideas as U.S. President Donald Trump obstructed ("an unprecedented campaign of obstruction of justice" against) the U.S. Congress by not giving to the U.S. Congress (or some units of the U.S. House of Representatives) requested documents [though a U.S. president is not beholden to to outright give out such materials] and U.S. President Donald Trump is a threat to free and fair elections in the United States of America, and the morning of the day was more lies dressed up with an authoritative face, and Daniel Goldman pushed out the idea that you should look at all the evidence in context related to, for instance, Donald Trump's "month's-long scheme" to deceive, but--I note--history shows that Donald Goldman was not looking at all the evidence in context, such as the fact that a president has the right to go to court to protect the office of the U.S. president and block the U.S. Congress's work to make a U.S. president a puppet to the U.S. Congress (which is related to the separation of powers of the main branches of the United States of America).  Daniel Goldman pushed out the idea that Donald Trump did not actually want an investigation of the Bidens by President Zelensky but only wanted publicity that came from an announcement of a possible investigation of the Bidens and Donald Trump was involved in a "pressure campaign" on President Zelensky.  Generally speaking, on December 9, 2019, Daniel Goldman was used by the Democrats in at least the U.S. House of Representatives to run an overview of lies and such that had been put out by, for example, so-called witnesses at the recent live hearings conducted by the U.S. House of Representatives, such as by Marie Yovanovitch and Pamela Karlan.  The morning session, which was devoted to information from the Democrats, lasted about two hours and a half, and then there was a hiatus, and then Republicans got to pass along a rebuttal through a counsel, Stephen Castor.  Stephen Castor reported as a general thought that the Democrats have passed along evidence that is speculation or presumption or hearsay [which this document has shown is correct information], and he presented thoughts to counter the Democrats' information.  Hold it!  When the Democrats had control of presenting stuff--in the morning--they presented video of Donald Trump's talking about having Russia find Hillary Clinton's missing 30,000-or-so emails, and Donald Trump's thought about the emails--which good people know were a part of a joke--took place when Donald Trump was yet only running to be the U.S. president (particularly on July 27, 2016), so why was the video presented, since the joke has no relation to any day that Donald Trump was the U.S. president between January 2017 and December 2019?  In the afternoon of December 9, 2019, Daniel Goldman and Stephen Castor went through a question-and-answer session, and something odd happened, and it was that a man named Barry H. Berke got to do questioning while sitting next Jerrold Nadler--Barry H. Berke (a "Democratic counsel") had started out the day as a witness in the hearing, and Stephen Castor (a "Republican counsel") did not get to sit with the U.S. Representatives of the committee and ask questions of Barry H. Berke or any person in the afternoon or at any time.  By the way, U.S. Representative Zoe Lofgren (a Democrat) pushed out the idea to Daniel Goldman that U.S. President Donald Trump has not provided any information to the U.S. House of Representatives to prove his innocence, trying to give the impression Donald Trump must have no evidence or is hiding something, even though the impeachment-inquiry tactic is not following true impeachment procedures (which would, for one, allow U.S. President Donald  Trump to present his witnesses and evidence and question witnesses against him), and the Democrats pushed the crap and tried to sell the idea that Joseph Biden (as a vice president of the United States of America) pushed for the firing of a Ukraine prosecutor with backing of other governments, which--I say then--means not Joseph Biden alone but Joseph Biden (in association with U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama) and members of other countries were involved in using bribery to get rid of someone in a prosecution job in Ukraine (and that is still bribery) [Note: Why would leaders of other countries and U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden and U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama worry about a single prosecutor in Ukraine, who is not actually a leader in the Ukraine, such as as a prime minister or a president (who can be involved in setting down laws in Ukraine), and who is only involved in internal matters of Ukraine?  The argument of the Democrats that Joseph Biden was working for international interests does not make sense!  I state that a bunch of countries do not get together to get rid of a single prosecutor in a particular country.].  On the evening of December 9, 2019, the hearing ended, ending some nine hours later and ending as a "show trial" or a "monkey trial" under the leadership of Jerrold Nadler, who, early in the day, had ruled the committee or he would not follow a real rule of the U.S. House of Representatives, a rule known as "Rule XI" (or the "Minority Witness Rule"), which gave the minority party in the U.S. House of Representatives one day to present witnesses chosen by the minority party during a hearing or hearings related to a subject, and I can say--And so went "the rule of law" (under the Democrats (or communists or socialists)) out the door.  And that is where my reporting about the impeachment theme with live hearings has to be ended for this edition of Television History and Trivia.
   [Note: In the end, a good and smart person has the ask the self about the telephone call of July 25, 2019, between President Trump and President Zelensky, which at least President Trump knew had people listening in to live and which would be put in historical records (such as in transcript form)--Why would Donald Trump do an impeachable action right out in the open with people listening?  Of course, communists and socialists and progressives--the Democrats--would say that Donald Trump's action is to be expected since Donald Trump is a really, really stupid man, though I say that facts do not bear that out.  And the freaks--society killers--will continue the fake story.]
    [* = I have to talk about "bribery" here. In the case of bribery in relation to a U.S. president, bribery would be a situation in which some country gives money or something to the U.S. president, and then the U.S. president is beholden to the other country and puts the interests of the other country before the interests of the United States of America.  Nothing like that can be alleged to exist in relation to, for example, the telephone call of July 25, 2019, and the issue of Joe Biden.  "Bribery" has no place in the discussion of Donald Trump and impeachment.]
    [** = I have to talk about "obstruction of justice" or "obstruction of Congress."  Jonathan Turley pointed out that there are three equal main parts of the federal government--the Legislative Branch (with the U.S. Congress), the Executive Branch (headed by the U.S. president), and the Judicial Branch (with, for one, the U.S. Supreme Court), and he noted that a president is not required to supply the U.S. Congress with stuff, such as documents or even employees of the Executive Branch, at the will or whim of the U.S. Congress (or a committee of the U.S. Congress), and a U.S. president can go to courts (filing a case or cases) to see whether or not the U.S. president must supply the U.S. Congress with particular stuff.  Remember--The U.S. president is not an employee of the U.S. Congress.  Donald Trump did take issues to the court, and such actions (doing court actions) by Donald Trump are not impeachable offenses, and also Donald Trump in relation to the so-called "Robert Mueller investigation" provided an incredible amount of documents.  I report that a committee of the U.S. Congress or the U.S. Congress--as a unit or thing--is not a dictator that can order a U.S. president around at will.]

    The previous big block of text is enough information from me to show that the live hearings on television were a sham from the Democrats (communists and socialists and such), and I could have put more about the subject in the section, but I shall leave the other ideas to other writers, such as those who will have the resources and contacts to write long books about the subject and tell the real truth fully.  I report that I have a document on the Internet that is a reading-list document, urging you to see a number of books, such as those that show up the rottenness of the Robert Mueller investigation of Donald Trump.  That document will probably some time soon report on at least one book that will fully discuss the hearings and the crap that was being pushed through the hearings by the enemies of the good people of the United States of America, such as the non-communists and non-socialists.  The reading-list document can be reached through this link--Reading.

    Every Sunday evening, the Fox News Channels airs a television program called Life, Liberty & Levin.  On Sunday, December 8, 2019, Mark R. Levin (the host of the television show and the host of a nationally syndicated radio show entitled The Mark Levin Show) had a man named Alan Dershowitz as the guest (for one hour).  Alan Dershowitz, who is a "liberal/socialist", who is a famous lawyer, and had not voted for Donald Trump to be a U.S. president, put down the impeachment process being conducted by the U.S. House of Representatives.  I urge you to hunt down the program, such as through Twitter in relation to Mark R. Levin or Life, Liberty and Levin.

    Incidentally, on Monday, December 9, 2019, the Office of the Inspector General (of the federal government), which was headed by Michael Horowitz (a Barack Obama appointee), issued a report in relation to, for one, FISA applications with respect to the Donald Trump election campaign, and, for one, the report did not find, in essence, any political bias or motivation related to the idea of surveillance, which Mark R. Levin talked about on his radio show on the day and put down as foolishness, and on the day, some people discovered that, for one, U.S. Attorney John Durham had issued a statement on the day that he is not in agreement with the "IG Report" ("BREAKING: John Durham issues statement saying he does NOT agree with IG Report conclusions...".  The Right Scoop, 9 December 2019, 1:42 p.m..).  [Note: You are urged to listen to the podcast of the episode of The Mark Levin Show for Monday, December 9, 2019.]

    I have to report on a famous media subject here--fake news or suppressed news or slanted news.   On Wednesday, December 4, 2019, the Detroit Free Press had an article (Jansen, Bart, and Christal Hayes.  "Report: Evidence is 'overwhelming.'"  Detroit Free Press, 4 December 2019, pp. 1A and 7A.) about the release of the roughly 300-page report about impeachment and Donald Trump that had been released the previous day, and the story was front and center on the front page of the newspaper, and there was a photograph of Donald Trump sitting in a car [Note: I bet the photograph was chosen, since it sort of gives the impression Donald Trump is alone or is now an outcast.].  The article was a staged piece, implying Donald Trump is guilty of something (especially to those who only glance at the front page at a news stand or a grocery store or whatever).  One piece of text on the front page of the story noted--"'The evidence of the President's misconduct is overwhelming, and so too is the evidence of his obstruction of Congress,' the 300-page report said.".  [Note: Think back to the big paragraph of this document and the "note" stuff.]  Then, on Thursday, December 5, 2019, on page 11A, the Detroit Free Press had an article entitled "Fiery disagreements flare up as impeachment is considered" (Mascaro, Lisa, and Mary Clare Jalonick.  "Fiery disagreements flare up as impeachment is considered."  Detroit Free Press, 5 December 2019, p. 11A.), and only a third of the article was related to the hearing of the previous day, and much of the article was about whether or not U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi was going to get impeachment articles issued against Donald Trump.  Here is what the newspaper article had in relation to Mr. Feldman, Ms. Karlan, and Mr. Gerhardt of the hearing--"The three legal experts called by Democrats backed impeachment.  Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law School professor, said he considered it clear that the president's conduct met the definition of 'high crimes and misdemeanors.'  Pamela Karlan, a Stanford Law School professor and former Obama administration Justice Department official, said the president's action constituted an especially serious abuse of power 'because it undermines democracy itself.'".   Here is the material pertaining to Jonathan Turley that the article passed along--"Republican witness Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said the Democrats were bringing a 'slipshod impeachment' case against the president, but he didn't excuse the president's behavior.  'It is not wrong because President Trump is right,' Turley said.  'A case for impeachment could be made, but it cannot be made on this record.'".  So the Detroit Free Press made a big deal of the impeachment theme on one day and downplayed the theme on the next day (when, really, Jonathan Turley had blown up the impeachment theme, as I have shown in the long paragraph above).  Why did not the Detroit Free Press cover the ideas about "obstruction of justice" or "obstruction of Congress" in relation to Jonathan Turley, as I have in this document?

    In past T.H.A.T. documents, I have talked about Nolan Finley, who is, for one, an editorial writer at The Detroit News [Note: Nolan Finley's name appears in T.H.A.T. #69, T.H.A.T. #87, T.H.A.T. #99, T.H.A.T. #126, T.H.A.T. #154, and T.H.A.T. #154.].  Nolan Finley pushes out the idea, such as through television shows of the Detroit area, that he is a "Republican," but I have shown that he is a low-level thinker and an enemy of good people.  By the way, Nolan Finley had a regular radio show on 910AM Superstation of the Detroit area for two years, ending in August 2019.  On Sunday, November 17, 2019, Nolan Finley had an article in The Detroit News entitled "Let's just impeach everyone" [Finley, Nolan.  "Let's just impeach everyone."  The Detroit News, 17 November 2019, p. 30A.], and here is some material from the article (an opinion)--"...What we saw during last week's hearings confirms there are no white hats in this impeachment fight.  No one purely motivated.  And the only righteousness on display is self-righteousness.  Picking sides is a pointless exercise that serves to perpetuate the poisonous partisianship ruining our country.  We should stop pretending there's virtue on one side of this enterprise and evil on the other and accept the reality that two things can be true at once.  Donald Trump can be an immoral scoundrel who abused the power of the presidency in pressuring a foreign country to help take down a political rival.  I believe that.  And Adam Schiff can be a scheming weasel who's had the impeachment papers on his desk for three years just waiting to fill in the blanks.  I believe that, too.  I put nothing past Trump, the most dishonorable president to ever hold the office.  His moral compass is without a needle.  Even in this vulgar social media age, Trump's coarseness is unacceptable for an American president....".  Based on the paragraph about the hearings that exists in this document, based in information in T.H.A.T. #187 about Adam Schiff's actions, based on information in T.H.A.T. #186 about Adam Schiff's actions, and based on all the documents that I have on the Internet about Barack Hussein Obama that show Barack Hussein Obama's rottenness, a good and smart person can see and deduce that Nolan Finley's ideas about Donald Trump--such as Donald Trump abused his office and Donald Trump is the "most dishonorable president to every hold the office"--are full of shit.  When you see Nolan Finley in print or on television, such as as a co-host of One Detroit (of WTVS-TV, Channel 56.1, Detroit, Michigan), understand that you are seeing a highly stupid and rotten man, masquerading as something smart and great and worthwhile.  Nolan Finley is your enemy, as are socialists and communists and progressives and Shariaists.

    I have reported in the past that television can be used to identify the rotten women and men in the country, and, in fact, I say that it is easy to find rotten people on television on a daily basis, and the rotten people can be in the form of news anchors and news reporters, sports figures (such as LeBron James), musicians (such as Stevie Wonder, Bruce Springsteen,  and Jon Bon Jovi), and politicians (mostly "Democrats" and some "Republicans").  On September 26, 2019, or around that date, people were able to see the underlying nature of Michael Bloomberg, who has been a businessman, has been a mayor or New York City (New York), and hopes he can become the U.S. President, and on that date, Michael Bloomberg showed why he should never be allowed to have a government job, especially a high-level government job acquired through election.  Michael Bloomberg was on Firing Line (a weekly show tied to PBS and PBS-affiliated television stations), and he said things that should call up fear in good people.  By the way, just because a person can get rich by running businesses and can become an elected politician, it does not prove the mind of the person is not suited for being in a government job, where defective thinking can lead to hurt or death for millions.  One thing that Michael Bloomberg said on Firing Line when the main topic guided along by host Margaret Hoover had to do with the climate and climate change and the Chinese's using coal was--"...They [the Chinese leaders] are now moving plants [coal-based power plants] away from the cities.  They, the, the communist party wants to stay in power in China, and they listen to the public.  When the public says I can't breathe the air.  Xi Jinping [the head of China] is not a dictator!  He has to satisfy his constituents, or he's not going to survive...." and "...He, he has a constituency to, to, to, ah, ah, answer to...." and "...No government survives without the will of the majority of its people.  Okay?  It's, it's just, he, he has to deliver services...."  Michael Bloomberg's thoughts are those off a naive mind and a sick mind and a mind that is defective in relation to understanding what communism is.  Consider only some of the reasons Michael Bloomberg can end up being a society killer.  In communist counties, the government is a single party system, and in China, there is only the communist party, and the politicians are not responsive to the citizens, and the politicians are responsive to the ways of the party (the rules of communistic governments).  In communist countries, the people have no weapons that can be used to put down their rotten government--and that government is in the form of communism ways (enslavism ways), which involves unrestricted control over the citizens by the rulers, who can be rulers for life.  In communist countries, the rulers do not listen to the people--or the so-called citizens--and, anyway, the citizens cannot publicly criticize the government and make their real feelings known to the government, and if a citizen criticizes the government, the citizen can be put in prison, put in re-education camps, put through torture, and even killed.  In communist countries, killing of politicians who might pose a threat to politicians currently in office, such as top-level leaders, does happen, and it has happened in China, Russia, the Soviet Union, Cuba, North Korea, as history shows.  On television, particularly on Firing Line of September 26, 2019, Michael Bloomberg--who has a highly warped sense of what communism is or is trying to make people believe communism is good--was selling shit!  In addition, I state that Michael Bloomberg has the mind of a freak!
    [Note: Michael Bloomberg is not the only rotten man in the public eye who has praised communism in public on television.  For instance, I talked about Chris Cuomo (a broadcaster, such as at CNN) in T.H.A.T. #144 and his praise for Cuba and the Cuban government--a communistic entity--during the television broadcast of March 21, 2016.  To see T.H.A.T. #144, use this T.H.A.T. #144 link.]

    I have about 48 years of being involved in broadcasting, and I could say I have about 52 years if I count my time making Heathkit radio stuff, such as a short-wave radio, while listening to WKNR-AM 1300 (Dearborn, Michigan) in 1967 while at a house in Inkster, Michigan.  Over the years, I have learned that a man named Bill Moyers has been a supporter of socialists and communists for years.  Bill Moyers for decades was the featured newscaster for PBS, the socialistic/communistic-based television network.  On November 11, 2019, Bill Moyers was a guest on a television show called Reliable Sources on CNN (the so-called news network), which is a network the supports socialists and communists and big-time liars.  The host speaking to Bill Moyers was Brian Stelter.  For one, Bill Moyers said, answering a question about his possibly fearing for the country at a time of an impeachment hearing on television--"For the first time in my long life--and I was born in the Depression, lived through World War II, ah, had been a part of politics and government for all these years--now, yes, for the first time, because I--you know, a society, a democracy can die of too many lies.  And we're getting close to that terminal moment unless we reverse the obsession with lies that are being fed around the country....".  Hold it!  Notice Bill Moyers does not present words about who's presenting lies, such as CNN people or Michael Bloomberg [as noted in the previous paragraph] or Adam Schiff (the latter of whom had pushed out super big lies at a broadcast of a U.S. House of Representatives hearing on September 26, 2019, which I had talked about in T.H.A.T. #186).  So who is Bill Moyers talking about and trying to lie about?  Later, Bill Moyers said--"...Do facts matter anymore?  I think they do.  Ah, I think they've mattered in the Watergate hearings, in the Clinton hearings, and I think they'll matter this time too.  I listened this morning to Donald Trump's rally in Louisiana.  It was astonishing.  He shouted at his audience, and they responded.  They believed everything he said.....".  Hold it!  I have to very long documents on the Internet that show quotes and nonsense spoken by Barack Hussein Obama, and when there was an audience, I could see they believed everything Barack Hussein Obama said, but I proved he passed around crap.  Bill Moyers also said--"I'm hoping, if only ten percent of those people come and watch the hearings in toto, they will see it's not a witch hunt, and they will begin to doubt their master, and they will being to break off and maybe become a citizen again, instead of a partisan...."  Hold it!  Notice how Bill Moyers put down the Donald Trump supporters--calling them non-citizens or non-Americans really.  Remember--Work to put Donald Trump out of office began at least from the day that he took on the office of the president of the United States of America, and the country got some two years of the "Donald Trump Dossier" (a fake document, pushed forth on the country by, for instance, Hillary Clinton) and the days of the Robert Mueller investigation, which was a sham, and now there is the impeachment over a telephone call that was nothing, yet Bill Moyers worked to sell his crap in Reliable Sources.  And once more, Americans got to see a horrid person on television, this time being Bill Moyers.

    Here is a reminder about socialists and communists and their ways of life for people.  Walls were built by Russia to keep East Germans in.  North Korea has walls to keep people from escaping.  Cuba does not allow people (so-called citizens) to leave, and people have to flee in rickety boats and such.  If communism is so great, why do people try to flee it?

    I have information in this paragraph that can go in the crap department of history files.  On Tuesday, November  26, 2019, I happened--just happened--to see the opening to the CBS Evenings News with Norah O'Donnell.  The first story was about winter storms, and during the story, there was this text at the bottom of the screen--"Back-to-back storms threaten 250 million people".  Since CBS News supports the idea that man is killing the planet in relation to climate change and man's using fossil fuels, I have to point out that CBS seemed to be selling the idea that the weather is getting worse in the world, and it is now threatening 250-million persons, or 250-million persons are to be in doom.  Bullshit!  The weather is no such threat.  Snowstorms have to come at man for centuries and centuries, and the storms have killed few.  CBS News was selling crap. [Note: Al Roker of the Today show as been doing the same type of nonsense for decades.]
    [Note: By the way, I was away from Detroit on Wednesday, November 13, 2019, when a new record low--since temperature records were started to be kept officially--was set in Detroit, beating the previous record of 12 degrees of 1911, and so goes manmade global warming, and I could talk about the snowfall records, and I may some day.]

    Since I published the previous edition of Television History and Trivia, there was a fifth debate of the candidates of the Democratic Party for the nomination for the U.S. presidency, and the debate was filled with more crap, like that which I have talked about in recent editions of Television History and Trivia tied to the other debates, and since I  have already shown up the rottenness that the other debates have exhibited, I have decided to pass on talking about the fifth debate--it was more from evil minds.

    Face the Nation is a weekly CBS-TV show, and on Sunday, December 1, 2019, I caught a portion of the show, and the portion was loaded with idiocy.  For example, one portion had an interview with a so-called presidential-historian whose current book in publication is The American Story, and that person was David Rubenstein.  One thought pushed out by David Rubenstein noted that a president should learn about what we have done right and what he have done wrong as a country, but David Rubenstein made no comment about, for example, what was wrong.  It was an interview of fluff, and nothing useful was presented.  And then, there was sort of a round-table discuss of fluff and nonsense with, for example, Ruth Marcus (the writer of Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover (a book) and a writer at The Washington Post, the communistic entity), Michael Duffy (of The Washington Post, a communistic entity), and Susan Page (of USA Today), who pushed out how the witnesses of the previous two weeks of the live impeachment-inquiry hearings were useful, and another guest was John Meacham, another so-called presidential historian (whose current book in publication is The Soul of America) who pushed out the nonsense that "impeachment" can be anything that the U.S. House of Representatives defines it to be (a theme taken from the long-dead U.S. President Gerald Ford), and that idea is bullshit, since the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Congress does not have the ultimate power to define impeachable actions, which, if allowed, could be anything in the universe, from chewing gum to putting down a communistic leader.  Of the portion of Face the Nation that I saw, people worked--through stealth--to put down U.S. president Donald Trump, and that was the main goal

    By the way, I caught John Meacham on an episode of Washington Week of PBS on Friday, November 29, 2019, and he pushed out the goofy Gerald Ford theme about how "impeachment" reasons can be anything the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Congress wants them to be, and that is a false idea, as documents of history (such as those related to the founding of this country, The Federalist Papers) show, and the episode of Washington Week was used to attack--though not in a heavy-handed nature--U.S. President Donald Trump, and another person interviewed on the program was Maggie Haberman of the communistic network known as CNN, and Maggie Haberman pushed out nonsense about, for example, Donald Trump's not doing self-examination about himself, such as in relation to his behavior, and Donald Trump's working to get the Republican Party to bend to his will, which she hinted was bad (and which I note is not bad, since many upper-level members of the Republican Party have been supporting the ways of the Democratic Party, such as communism, and not taking on the rotten people of the Democratic Party by backing U.S. President Donald Trump).

    [Note: I could spend hours showing up the rottenness of what was said by people on the episode of Face the Nation and the episode of Washington Week that I caught, since there is more that could be covered.]

    Hold it!  On Tuesday, December 3, 2019, I happened upon Channel 6.3 (broadcast) of WCMU-TV in the eight o'clock hour in the evening, and the channel was showing a program called Carol Burnett; A Celebration.  The program had pledge breaks, and then it was at a pledge break, and the break sort of sold crap, or at least David Rubinsohn, one of the hosts at the time, was sort of selling crap.  He mentioned, for example, how programming on PBS is "quality" programming and "safe" programming.  "Safe"--It sounded like crap to me, given I know the network pushes out socialistic and communistic themes in much programming, such as PBS NewsHour and Amanpour and Company on each weekday, and the network pushes out defective programs about climate change and about U.S. President Donald Trump.  I report--PBS is not a place for "safe" programming.  I announce that to counter David Rubinsohn's idea.  Normally, Channel 6.3 is the Create channel, but it was pledge time for the station.

    And I have this section as a "for-the-record" section.  On Sunday, December 8, 2019, U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler (a "Democrat") was on the weekly television series called Meet the Press (of NBC-TV).  One theme that Jerrold Nadler pushed forth was that seventy-percent of the people of America think U.S. President Donald Trump did some type action that was "very wrong". And I report that that is more crap from Jerrold Nadler, which I have knocked down through this document and others that I have existing on the Internet at the home of The Hologlobe Press.  [Note: We shall see what the next national election really shows about the American public, though many in the American public already have bought the lies and crap from the Democrats and many people in the main media of several years now.]

    Yes, television can show off crappy and rotten people.  On December 8, 2019, I saw another political commercial for Michigan featuring a woman called "Lori" on a Fox TV affiliate in Michigan.  Lori voted for Donald Trump to be president, but now she is disappointed with the decision, and in the commercial, Lori pushed out the crap that Donald Trump is responsible for her health-care premiums increasing a lot.  However, I can report that Donald Trump has done nothing, such as sign a bill from the U.S. Congress into law, to make health-care premiums go up, but the country still has the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (a communistic law, designed to lead to complete government control of health care in the country, which is a hideous thing to have and which is tied to Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic Party).  So the commercial is more lies from the Democrats or, in this case, the AB Foundation, which paid for the advertisement.  A ending theme of the commercial was--"Lori's community is being left behind.".  Such crap the commercial--which was aimed at electing someone else as U.S. president--was and is.  [Note: Another commercial has been running around this time with Lori, who lives in Romeo, Michigan, and the other commercial pushes the idea that U.S. President Donald Trump has done nothing directly to help for Romeo, Michigan, get better, and these commercials are running, by the way, around the federal government reported the national economy is going great.  What is the local government of Romeo like?  What type of persons are running it?  Do the operators have the mind-set of socialists?  Blame first goes to the operators of Romeo and not Donald Trump!]

   Announcement for the novice again (reworked in May 2017): To get useful television-delivered news or Internet-delivered news, WorldNetDaily.com, "The Drudge Report," and CNS News (which is on the Internet and which was launched on June 16, 1998), since the entities do not blindly support Barack Obama-type people (communists and Shariaists), as do CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV (Note: To learn about bad journalism, you might tune in to CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV from time to time to see how they differ from the better places mentioned).  I note that Fox News Channel is evolving into a rotten channel, becoming like those that I have put down in this paragraph.  If you are unclear of my intentions, I say in different words that you should boycott CNN, MSNBC, NBC-TV, CBS-TV, and ABC-TV and even now much of what is on the Fox News Channel and hope they lose more ratings and advertising revenues, since they are expendable, and it is time for you to find the guts to be mean and heartless and cancel them--since they are hurting you.  [Note: Everyone in the Democratic Party in the country is rotten, and the Republican Party establishment has shown itself to be socialistic and communistic within the last few years, and only a few of the rotten people are U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell, Jeb Bush, and Chris Christie.]

    It is time for that famous feature of Television History and Trivia documents--Looking at the Movies.  Lately, you have been given a lot of hearsay evidence and useless evidence and non-evidence in relation to the impeachment hearings or inquiries, so I stay in the "evidence" mode and present "secret" evidence here, and I will not tell you what the "secret" evidence is.  Actually, "Secret Evidence" is a movie that was released in movie theaters to the public in January 1941, only a few months before the United States of America would get directly involved with World War II, such as by taking on the socialistic Adoph Hitler of Germany, who would kill millions of Jewish people, such as by gasing them with poison gas.  "Secret Evidence" showed up on Channel 2, WJBK-TV, on Sunday May 22, 1949, at 9:00 p.m.. The movie features such performers as Marjorie Reynolds, Charles Quigley, Ward Taggart, Howard Masters, and Bob White.  I have to report that, it seems, Marjorie Reynolds' career started out in 1923 and ran to 1978, and she worked in films and television, and her last film was The Silent Witness of 1962.  The storyline of "Secret Evidence" will go unsaid, since I do not want give away any secrets.  To see "Secret Evidence", go to YouTube, and make it a presentation of Looking at the Movies, maybe at three in the morning.  By the way, it is a type of movie that would fit well on Television Drive-in.

    Announcement: Recently, I have added some new documents to the collection of my documents at the website for The Hologlobe Press.  One of the documents is entitled A Document that Dispels Myths and Nonsense of Science-Fiction Books, Movies, and Television Shows (A Logic Puzzle), which can be reached through this Myths link.  Another document is And So You Think You're Going to the Moon, Mars, or the Stars..., which can be reached by using this Moon link.  And yet another of the documents is entitled And the Stupid Women Shall Lead--and Lead Ever Good Individual into Shit, Driven on by Communism, Feminism, and Defective Female Beliefs and Little-Girl Thinking, which can be reached through this Stupid Women link.

    Here is stuff for the "what-the-heck-went-wrong?" file.  The Moodys Christmas made a debut on Fox TV on Wednesday, December 4, 2019--two half-hour epsides--but the short-flight series was not listed in TV Guide.  For the week of Monday, December 2, 2019, there were five episodes of Making It on ABC-TV, but they were not listed in TV Guide.  On Friday, December 6, 2019, a college football game aired on ABC-TV, but it was not listed in TV Guide.  Boy, did something go wrong or what?

    And here is a little television history note.  On November 25, 2019, I turned on a television set, and when the screen lighted up, Today (of NBC-TV) was running on the screen, and Al Roker, Craig Melvin, Sheinelle Jones were interviewing Michael Eric Dyson, a professor of sociology at Georgetown University, who was pushing people to buy his twenty-first book.  In essence, right then, Michael Eric Dyson pushed out the crap that Colin Kaepernick was a good guy and was chastised about two years ago for protesting against police brutality in the United States of America, and Michael Eric Dyson pushed out the idea that, in essence, Colin Kaepernick was yet being unfairly treated.  Hold it!  Go back and see Television History and Trivia #162 (which can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #162 link)--it shows Colin Kaepernick was a supporter of highly rotten people, such as the communistic Fidel Castro of Cuba, a killer.  I report that Michael Eric Dyson, a race baiter (as history shows), was selling crap and lying about what Colin Kaepernick is and what good people understand Colin Kaepernick to be.

    Remember: The Prisoner with Patrick McGoohan was a television show that was produced across the pond and shown on CBS-TV in the late 1960s, and I urge you to find The Prisoner on DVD, maybe from a library, and watch it, and you should show it--all the episodes--to teenagers, or buy it as a present for teenagers.

Stay well!


    P.S.: You are urged to see my document entitled One of "The Rules of Man"--A Rule About Health Care that No Politician May Supersede with Law, which can be reached through this Rule1 link.  I have deduced that all the Democrats and most Republicans support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and have no intention of killing it, though it should be killed for violating, for one, "The Rules of Man."  For example, Republicans Jeb Bush and Chris Christie support the rotten law, and that is one reason that I define them as stupid men and not men who are good enough--in this day and age--to be the U.S. President.  I note that the "mandate"--which forces everyone to buy government-approved health-care insurance--violates one of "The Rules of Man," and it is a rule that is attacked in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.  Anyone who supports the "mandate" is not a good enough person or a smart enough person to be the U.S. president--the mandate is "enslavism," and the "mandate" allows government people--who are often and usually bad people, as history shows--decide what health care a person can get, and that is bad.

copyright c. 2019
Date published: December 10, 2019

The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan  49721
The United States of America

To see the next edition of T.H.A.T.,
    click on: T.H.A.T. #189.
To see the previous edition of T.H.A.T.,
    click on: T.H.A.T. #187.
To see the catalog page for T.H.A.T. editions,
    click on: T.H.A.T..
To see information about the news business in
    the country and its failures and its betrayal of
    the American public, click on: T.H.A.T. #55.
To go to the main page of The Hologlobe Press,
    click on: www.hologlobepress.com.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled Never Forget These Media Darlings ? --
    A Guide for the Individual in the United
    States of America, which can reached by
    using this link: Media.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled Film and Television Production
    Tax Credits: The Bad Side of the Issue,
    which can be reached through this link:
    Tax Credits.
For further reading, you should see the document
    AMERICA for the individual woman and the
    individual man, which can be reached by
    hitting this link: Thoughts.
For further reading, you should see the document
    LOGIC for the individual woman and the
    individual man, which can be reached by
    hitting this link: Logic.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled Political Lessons for the Individual Woman
    and the Individual Man in the United States of
    America, which can be reached by hitting this
    link: Lessons.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations
    of Barack Obama, which can be reached at
    this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the document
    about censorship, Fairness?: A Guide for the
    Individual Woman and the Individual Man
    in the United States of America, which can be
    reached at this link: Fairness.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure:
    The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be
    reached at this link: Health.
For further reading, you should see the document
    entitled  A Collection of Words--Just Words--
    That Show Dangerous People, which can be
    reached through this link: Words.

Keep in mind: T.H.A.T. documents and Michigan
    Travel Tips documents published since the middle
    of 2008 contain more quotations and statements
    of Barack Obama's that you should see.  To see
    the editions of Michigan Travel Tips, you should
    go to the catalog page, which can be reached by
    hitting this link: Travel.