Objectives and Tactics:
Principles for Improving the
United States of America
Victor Edward Swanson,
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
The United States of America
copyright c. 2011
February 9, 2011
I have been saying to myself for a number of decades that the next better country than what the United States of America is will be created in space--on some planet that is countless light years away--and that is not to say that the United States of America is not a great country, but it is very unlikely that a country that is better than the United States of America is will be created on Earth, and I have many reasons to say that. One reason that the next better country will be created in space is too many countries of the world today are set up with governments made up of people who are not willing to give up power to create another better country than what the United States of America is because they would lose power and they might not be able to pass power on to relatives--to continue the line of power. Another reason that the next better country will be created in space is the first people to go up in space will very likely be individuals who are escaping the tyrannical ways of the places on Earth where they were raised or where they lived, and they will put into practice lessons learned through the history of the United States of America, and, by the time people really do go into space, the people will be smarter in the ways of nature and life than most of the people living today, and they will probably subscribe to "The Rules of Man," which are the universal rules of man.
For now, it is obvious to a thinking person that the United States of America needs to be improved. Ways of life that are contrary to "The Rules of Man," one way of which is having a strong centralized government, as wished for by, for example, the communist, have been and are being imposed on the United States of America, such as by a man with a highly defective mind, Barack Obama, and these ways of life that are contrary to "The Rules of Man" have to be discounted and discarded for the United States of America to get better. Ways in which the United States of America can be improved are what I present in this document, and the ways are presented as pieces of thought that must touch the deepest parts of your mind and become ingrained in the long-term memory structure of the brain so that you will regularly recall the ways and think about the ways.
This is a draft document, and it is very likely to be changed in form in the future. I made this draft document available, though it could have been made more complex before posting it, so that as soon as possible I could get a person who might not regularly think about the subjects that exist in the document would think about the subjects. I also note that parts of this document could disappear and maybe reappear from one version to the next, since changes in proposed legislation or a change in actual legislation could affect what should be made available and what can no longer exist in the document.
Now, examine the "improvement topics," which are accompanied by asides:
Number One: Make it possible to recall U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives in every state.
Currently, the members of the U.S. Senate and the U.S House of Representatives related to a particular state are put into office through a vote by people of the state, and it should be made standard in the country that U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives of a given state can be recalled by the people of the given state. If recall were made standard throughout the country, it would not be as if the people of a state could recall the U.S. Senators or the U.S. Representatives related to any of the other states. One reason to have recall possible is a person can lie about what the person is before getting into office as a U.S. Senator or a U.S. Representative, as Barack Obama did, and then once the person gets into office (based on lies), that person can do damage or do things that are against The U.S. Constitution, and when such a person does show a willingness to do damage to the country, the public should be able to remove the person from office and not have to wait for what could be, in the case of a U.S. Senator, up to nearly six years for an election to remove the person. The election of November 2008 shows that the press can be highly biased in the work that it does and will either suppress information about a candidate or present lies to cover up the real nature of a candidate, and the public must be able to remove a candidate who has been misrepresented to them by the press. Remember: In 2008, for example, many members of the press, such as the staffers at NBC-TV and MSNBC, promoted as good for the country a communist/socialist/Marxist/ man on the American public--Barack Hussein Obama. (You should see my document entitled Never Forget These Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the Individual in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this Media link, and my document entitled A Necessary Mission for Your Life and Freedom: Take on the Enemies in the Media, which can be reached by using this Mission link.)
Here is a fact-of-life aside. When a person is growing up and is living as an adult, the person will very likely meet up with or know bullies, as I have, and that means bullies do exist with the borders of the United States of America. When a person is growing up and is living as an adult, the person will very likely meet up with or learn about bad people in the country, such as tax cheats and thieves and rapists, and that shows that bad people exist in the country. When a person is learning about politicians, the person has to expect that some politicians can actually be truly bad people, since some politicians can get through life and into political office by lying about who they are and what they are--bad people exist in the world, even within the borders of the United States of America. (You are urged to see such documents of mine as THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together"; Madness in a President and Other Matters of a Defective Mind; The Status of Barack Obama: A Little Logic Puzzle; The Evil and Sick Mind of Barack Obama: A Look at His Insidious and Treacherous Ways (Attacking Real Scientists, the U.S. Military, and More); and Enemies of the United States of America: Politicians Who Have Hurt You and Your Family by Voting "Yes" on Bad Federal Bills, the links to which exist at the end of this document.)
Number Two: Restrict the length of time during which members of the U.S. Supreme Court may serve.
As a man or a woman ages, it is possible that the brain or the main or the woman can break down; for instance, a person can become be affected by Alzheimer's Disease, or a person can succumb to some other disease that affects the mind and the body like a stroke. Currently, once a person is appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the highest-level court in the country, the person stays in the position till the person dies or the person decides to resign; a person can be at least somewhat ill in the mind and yet remain a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court. There must be a way to remove from the position as judge a person who can be deemed unfit to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Let me present ideas. Maybe after a person has served for 18 years, the person must pass a vote-of confidence election; at the first presidential election day after the person has served 18 years, the people of the country should vote either to uphold the person in office or to retire the person. Maybe a person should only be allowed to serve for no more than twenty-five years (if people becomes justices in their fifties, the people would be in their seventies when they would be forced to step down). (If I were making the rules, I would not allow a person to become a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court till the person were at least fifty years of age). Besides having one of the two potential rules presented, maybe, the U.S. Congress should be able to remove a justice on a two-thirds vote of no confidence. No matter what idea gets adopted as the way in which to remove a person from the U.S. Supreme Court, such a rule should exist, since some individuals are not willing to leave office willingly, though, for example, they are surely mentally impaired, and such a rule should exist since people can lie about who they are and what they are and end up in jobs where they can purposely damage the country. (The nature of some men is not always good, and some men do wish to do bad to other men, as Barack Obama has shown he is willing to do.)
Here is a fact-of-life aside. The solar system for the Earth has existed for billions of years, and Sol has existed for billions of years, and the Earth has existed for billions of years. Earth is a planet. Earth is a thing. Earth is not a living thing. Earth has no feelings or emotions. Earth does not grow old and die like a human does. You cannot hurt Earth. Earth is made of sand, stone, rock, water, oil, shale, coal, dirt, et cetera, and it will always be made up of those things for lifetimes of many generations of humans to come, and the arrangement of those things will change in the future, such as through the actions of ocean waves and volcanoes and the movement of the plates of the crust and though the work of ants (who make holes), beavers (who tear down trees and make dams on rivers), moles (who make tunnels), squirrels (who make holes), woodpeckers (who make holes in trees, which can lead to the tree falling), and humans (who move rock and dirt and sand). On Earth are living things--plants and animals--and over the last billion of years at least, the types of plants and animals have come and gone, and, in the future, the types of plants and animals will come and go. In the future--the far, far off future--Earth will no longer exist, maybe because Sol will collapse before spreading outward to engulf at least the inner planets of the solar system. Till the Earth disappears, the surface of it will change--man will move materials, mountains will get pushed up higher, lakes will wash away shorelines and build up shorelines, et cetera.
Number Three: Dismantle or the Environmental Protection Agency of the federal government or highly restrict the work of the Environmental Protection Agency.
The way in which the Environmental Protection Agency is set up, it has the power to affect and control the business sector of the country through issued rules or issued day-to-day rules, and if ill-minded bureaucrats have control or gain control of the Environmental Protection Agency, the agency can greatly affect what business can and cannot be done in the country, and that is not good. To make it clear, I note that the Environmental Protection Agency can more easily do what the U.S. Congress might, since the U.S. Congress has to create legislation that gets voted on--and either pass it or not pass it. Actually, the Environmental Protection Agency has already shown that it is hostile toward the private sector of the country, as is shown by the willingness of the management of it to enact cap-and-trade-type rules that are like those that have been proposed in the American Clean Energy and Security Act. If a state wishes to have a state version of the Environmental Protection Agency, it could set it up, but then that particular entity will only be able to affect the state, such as the economy, in which it exists, and if the national EPA cannot be completely removed, then, at the very least, a federal act should be enacted to highly restrict what rules the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can impose on the country on a day-to-day basis.
Number Four: Rein in the U.S. Department of the Interior.
This department--one of the departments of the Executive Branch--has been and is able to block what lands and waters and when lands and waters can be used for the drilling of oil in the country, and because of, for example, rulings in 2009 and early 2010, such as those announced by Ken Salazar (the head of the department), oil-related businesses in the United States of America have a hard time setting up and operating drilling rigs in the country, and oil refiners based in the United States of America are forced to get oil from other countries to meet the oil demand of the country, and that leads to money having to be sent to foreign countries, such as those that wish to do harm to the United States of America, and that hurts the country economically. I say that the hindrances to the drilling for oil in the U.S. have been put in place purposely by Democrats, such as Marxist Democrats, to hurt the United States of America--to increase the price of gasoline in the country so that people in the country will think that the oil companies are purposely working to keep gasoline prices high and make big profits--and I say that it is really done today so that Barack Obama will have an excuse to take control of the oil companies--nationalize them--as, for example, a new dictator or a new leader in a communist country might do. Legislation must be created to reduce the hold that the U.S. Department of the Interior has on the oil industry in the country, and the legislation must reduce the hardships put on the oil industry so that the oil industry can provide what is needed by the citizens of the country--oil--oil taken from the lands and waters of the United States of America. (Also, although I have made no special section about coal, I say that federal agencies or departments involved in suppressing the coal industry in the country have to be reined in, too.)
Here is a fact-of-life aside. The structure of the United States of America is based on The U.S. Constitution, and, for one, that document defines what rights the citizen of the country has within the country, and some of those rights exist under "The Bill of Rights" section, and many or most people of all the other countries of the world know what their countries are about--often suppression of the citizen--and know not what the United States of America is really about, and because those people do not know what the United States of America really is, knowing only what is taught them by their defective politicians and believing the United States of America is just a bigger version of their defective country, what they think about the United States of America can be useless thought, especially when it is bad, since they are basing their decisions on incorrect information. In addition, since other countries have political structures that are counter to the structure of the United States of America, those countries should not have influence on how the United States of America works and what rules exist in the United States of America--today, there are federal-type judges in this country who believe they should be able to site laws of other lands in their process of making decisions in court cases and making case law in this land, and that is defective thought and dangerous thought, which can lead to the country becoming like the defective countries elsewhere in the world.
Number Five: Stay out of the International Criminal Court.
Mostly, the world is made up of countries that are communistic, socialistic, dictator based, et cetera, and the political ideologists of such countries are counter to the ways of the United States of America and are opposed to the rights of the individual as given to the individual in the United States of America by, for example, "The Bill of Rights" of The U.S. Constitution. As the world stands today, the International Criminal Court is not an entity that the United States of America should be tied to, since the International Criminal Court is made up of too many people who hold values that are defective and tyrannical in nature--oppressive to the individual citizen. By the way, let me note that the U.S. Congress--an entity within the country--became through the election of November 2008 filled with too many people who held values that were counter to the values of people who uphold The U.S. Constitution. The main purpose of the International Criminal Court is to try people for possible war crimes, and it seems Barack Obama sees the International Criminal Court as a court that can be used to punish former high-ranking politicians of the United States of America, such as former U.S. President George W. Bush and former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. (You are urged to see my document entitled Justice for All?: The Rules are Changing Under Barack Obama, which has information about the International Criminal Court and Executive Order Number 12425 and which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document.)
Number Six: Never get embroiled in international treaties related to climate and cancel any such treaties.
By mid-November 2009, it was clear that the manmade-global-warming idea or the manmade-global-climate-change idea was and is a fraud, and it was evident that cap-and-trade legislation proposed by Barack Obama and a proposed international climate-change treaty associated with the United Nations had as a main purpose to hurt the economy of the United States of America, and, in fact, the proposed international climate-change treaty was designed to set up a new international communist government that would make U.S. law, such as The U.S. Constitution, subservient to the laws of the proposed treaty and the new international government. Because of that, the United States of America should not be involved in any international treaty related to the idea of climate change. Remember: The United Nations is an entity that is mostly made up of communists, dictators, Marxists, enslavers, et cetera, and much of the information that is released or issued by entities of the United Nations, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (or the IPCC), cannot be trusted. (You are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this link: Carbon.)
Here is a fact-of-life aside. On Tuesday, January 12, 2010, in the morning, the country known as Haiti had about nine-million persons, about eighty percent of whom were considered poor, and in the evening of that day, the country had a lot of new dead persons and a had lot of new useless buildings because a big earthquake had hit the country a few hours previously. Before the earthquake would hit, the country was already a dead country, which had been ruled by dictators and enslavers for decades, people who followed polices the promoted the centralized control of everything. Not far away from Haiti is another dead country--Cuba--which has followed the ways of a highly centralized governmental structure, headed by a dictator (just another communist), for decades. Haiti and Cuba are countries in which a few minds have worked to control the ways of millions of people as much as possible, and they have done that out of, for example, jealousy (the dictators are highly jealous of any persons who might be deemed as better than they are in any way) and illness in the mind, such as that in which they perceive themselves as having greater mental capacity than others have.
The United States of America is made up of about 300-million persons--300-million minds--and no government panel or committee or board, which is made up of a few minds, can really guide the day-to-day workings of the entire country or the many, many parts of the country well, and because the United States of America is not based on a structure in which few minds set the day-to-day policies of many, as happens in communists countries and dictatorship countries or highly centralized-government countries, that has allowed the United States of America to prosper in many fields of industry and many fields of study of the mind.
Consider some thoughts. In the United States of America, individuals have been free to think of ways to do things and build things, spurred on by their seeing what is around them in the world; if a person sees something that could be done or should be done, the person is, for the most part, free to do it, and the doing of something could be from trying to create a new invention to developing a new plant (what gets done is not determined by a centralized government--a few minds). In a country with a highly centralized government, most people are blocked from doing things, and that reduces the variety of things that get done, and often politics determine what gets done and when things get done, and things often only get done when the things will benefits the ideas of politics, and when a government entity based at one place, such as the capital of this country, is involved in determining whether or not something is attempted and done in other places, the entity has to set priorities about what does and does not get done and the impetus to do something for a particular place can be low, since the pressure to do something for the particular place has a hard time reaching the government entity, and also, the level of risk to make any attempt to do something is dependent on what the members of the government entity are and know, and the members are very unlikely to attempt anything in which failure is highly likely, since their risk level is usually low, knowing failure could result in their losing their jobs, and that means the striving to do great is reduced and create the exceptionable is reduced.
And the United States of America is made up of about 300-million persons--300-million minds--and no government panel or committee or board, which is made up of a few minds, has enough mind power to control the complexity of a society with such a number of minds and make the country become better through trial and error and failure and success, and no one mind, especially that of a mind filled with the ways communism and Marxism and like ideologies, such as that of Barack Obama, is smart enough to direct the actions of so many persons efficiently or effectively or successfully.
Number Seven: Keep the government out of the ownership of the banks and other financial institutions.
When a government is involved in the banking and investment business, a political ideology can ultimately be the basis of whether or not a business transaction does or does not get done--no matter how good or bad the idea of the business transaction--and when a government controls who does and does not get loans, a person's getting a loan can depend on whether or not the person seeking the loan holds political values that are like those who can give out loans, and if the beliefs of the people who can give out loans believe in ways that are counter to the ways of The U.S. Constitution--and one of such person is Barack Obama--then the people who uphold the ways of The U.S. Constitution can be blocked from getting loans that could improving their lives, such as their homes or their businesses.
Number Eight: Disallow the federal government from having an ownership stake in any business and extract the federal government from the ownership of any business.
In 2008-2009, people in the federal government--mostly members of the Democratic Party--pushed the federal government into ownership of businesses, such as two big automobile companies, one of which was General Motor Corporation. Currently, the federal government holds stakes in what were once private-sector businesses, such as automobile-manufacturing companies. The federal government should not be allowed to gain ownership in any business, even if the business is on the brink of failure, and the federal government should be made to divest interests or stakes in any business in which it has a stake or interest, because political ideologies and not economic reasons can be used to determine whether or not something is created, done, or built, which leads to the public getting what is not wanted and what is not considered useful, forced to take what is created, done, or built by those tied closely to government, and when a government gets its hold in an industry it can, having unlimited funds available (such as money taken in as taxes from the private sector), lose money and can put any private-sector competition to it in that industry out of business--businesses have make profit to survive and governments can simply pull in more taxes or print money to keep going--and, ultimately, when such a situation exist, it leads to the government becoming a monopoly, in which choices become and are limited and in which the quality of products and services decreases, since the government has no incentive to do better under the force of competition.
Here is a fact-of-life aside. When the federal government is involved in setting the polices in the development of anything, from medicines to automobiles, few minds are involved in the process of doing the developing and making the final decisions, but when the private sector is involved in setting the policies in the development of anything, many, many minds can be involved and many, many different entities working independently can be involved, and the better minds will usually win out, winning in the battle of competition. When the federal government becomes a monopoly in a field or industry, the government need not worry about always setting aside money for research and development to make a product better so that it can compete with competitors who are working to better their products and make things better all the time, and, in an attempt to save money, the government will reduce the amount of money put toward research and development, and that slows down the development of the country.
Number Nine: Restrict the federal government from ever being able to break up a business.
In December 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill known as the Consumer Protection Agency Act (and it has yet to be passed by the U.S. Senate and signed into law by a U.S. President), and one of the provisions of the bill is a provision that allows the federal government to break up a business when the federal government believes that it should, and the provision can pertain to any business--from the biggest to the smallest. The idea of having the federal government in a position to break up a business at will--for any reason--is not a good idea, because, for one, if a company is doing well but the owners of the company have different political beliefs from those of the political party in power, the federal government can purposely punish the company for political reasons and even give assets of the company to persons who hold the beliefs of the political party in power. (In essence, the Democrat Party in the United States of America caused the break up of, for one, General Motors Corporation in 2009 and can gave parts of it to foreign entities, such as China.)
Number Ten: Block the federal government from financing or supporting any media entity, such as a newspaper or a magazine or a television station.
Generally speaking, the country has existed with the government not having ownership stakes in newspapers, magazines, radio stations, television stations, radio networks, television networks, et cetera, and that has allowed such entities to complete in the marketplace for customers, and that has led to at least some of the entities working to tell the truth to keep customers and stay in business. Ever since country was founded media entities have come and gone. It was commonplace in the 1700s and 1800s for newspapers or magazines to be started up and then be shut down because of lack of revenue, as I learned in the 1990s when I read such books by Frank Luther Mott as the five books that make up his multiple-volume work informally entitled A History of American Magazines and the book entitled American Journalism: A History: 1690-1960, and since the 1800s, magazines and newspapers have come and gone, and, around 2008-2009, a number of newspapers around the country died (one of the reasons is the entities had been pushing such ideologies as communism on readers, and readers gave up on the entities), and, in the future, it is very likely that newspapers and magazines will come and go, and since 1920, radio stations and other broadcast-related entities have come and gone, and it is very likely that radio stations and other broadcast-related entities will come and go. In essence, the federal government should never have an ownership stake in any media venture, such as a newspaper, a magazine, a radio station, a television station, a radio network, a television network, et cetera; however, I do say that the government may run a network that shows proceedings of the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, congressional committees, and federal courts. If a newspaper company, a magazine company, a radio station, a television station, a radio network, or television network, or such an entity is having financial difficulty, the government should not be allowed to bail it out, and the entity should either go into bankruptcy or be shut down, and, certainly, the biggest reason that the federal government should not be allowed to own any such entity is the federal government--when controlled by defective politicians with dangerous political ideas in mind--can use the controlled media entity, using taxpayer money, to promote ideas and only ideas that fit with the model of the political ideas upheld by those defective politicians. Anyway, things die, and media entities should die when it is necessary, such as when they are so busy pushing communist ideas on customers and customers reject the ideas and entities. Yes, currently, the federal government is involved in public radio and public television in the country, such as PBS and National Public Radio, and I say that the federal government should be moved out of such radio business and the television business, since the federal government is able to and does push political ideas, such as the hoax of manmade global warming, which is being pushed by Barack Obama, on Americans through such entities.
Here is a fact-of-life aside. I believe in evolution. Although the complete history of the line of man from millions of years ago to today is still unclear, it is evident branches of man have started up and then disappeared, reasons for which are not fully clear and known, and that is the way of nature and man, but it seems very like to me that political ideas or religious ideas upheld by some of the branches of men helped lead to their demise. Places in Africa still have people who practice the way of witch doctors, which is nonsense, and Africa has societies that are stalled, stuck in tribal ways, as they have been for decades and decades and decades, and Cuba and North Korea have followed the ways of communism for a long time, and both countries are depressed wastelands. There is ignorance in the world, the height of which are communism and Marxism, and, sometimes, ignorance has to be shunned or blocked from expanding out, and, sometimes, ignorance has to be left to itself and allowed fade away and die, since there comes a time with people have to be left to themselves, given their unwilling to listen and learn that they ways are the reason for their downfall and are leading to their distinction. Even today, societies exist are on the path of devolution and extinction. (Oh, another strict way of life is life based on Sharia Law, and, ultimately, societies based on Sharia will stall and fail.)
Number Eleven: Control the borders and block the idea of open borders.
When a family has a house or a home, that family protects the borders and defends the borders from those who might wish to take from the family or harm the family; for example, in a family with a good resident father, one of the main jobs of that father is protect the borders from intruders, through secured locks and doors and windows, and, if necessary, through the use of weapons, which has been the way of man for centuries. The United States of America is like a house or a home, or it is one of the houses or homes of the world, and the borders should be defended against intruders, such as illegal aliens, in order that there be better order in a house or a home--no good house or home can be sustained by accepting all comers, some of whom surely are rejects, deviants, castoffs, radicals, and lowlifes of other places, bred in houses and homes (countries) that can be based on defective philosophies of life and politics and instilled in ways that are counter to the ways of the United States of America, which is constructed around The U.S. Constitution, a document based on "the individual" and not "an individual," the latter of which pertains to, for example, a dictatorship. Persons who promote open borders--whereby anyone may come into the country--are bad for the country, and the idea of allowing anyone to enter the country is a bad idea. The borders of the U.S. must be better defended from people who enter the country illegally, and the idea of open borders must be rejected for all days to come so that the numbers of rejects, deviants, castoffs, radicals, and lowlifes of other places can be kept where they were bred--defective countries.
Number Twelve: Treat illegal aliens as foreigners--foreigners who should receive no special privileges.
For decades, laws have existed in this country that show how people born in other countries can become legal citizens of the country, and, for decades, many people who were born in other countries have followed those rules and worked hard to become citizens of this country. Without rules in a society, you have a lawless society, and without standards for becoming a citizen, a society gets diminished and down graded by allowing persons not beholden to the ways of this country, such as the ways of The U.S. Constitution, to enter the country. In at least parts of the United States of America, an illegal alien can obtain a driver's licenses, and illegal aliens can receive other privileges that should only be afforded to legal citizens of the country, such as benefits related to medical care, and it is not good that non-citizens have privileges above those of citizens and have privileges afforded to them over naturalized citizens who have worked for the rights afforded citizens. It is not the duty of the United States of America to support the world and rescue all the people of the world, who have to fight for themselves to at least some degree in their own countries to make the world better, so people who enter this country illegally should be blocked from staying in this country and should be sent back to their countries, which is the way other countries of the world operate.
Here is a fact-or-life aside. Over the last couple decades at least, politicians, especially those associated with the Democratic Party, have advocated open borders for the country because jobs exist in the country that citizens of this country will not do. I say that is nonsense thought, since, if jobs exist that need to be filled, the jobs will sooner or later get filled, because employers will find ways to attract employees.
Number Thirteen: Make sure every voter who is taking part in the voting process is fully verified.
Every voter should be issued a voter-identification certificate (with a photograph of the voter), after meeting the national qualifications for being a voter, such as being a true citizen of the United States of America and not being a person convicted of a felonious offense, and every voter must show proof of eligibility to vote at the time of voting, and there are no exceptions, and voting rules should exist that note that a person who fails to heed all the rules about voting is not allowed to vote at the time of voting, and there should be no exceptions to the rules--for example, a person's claiming ignorance of the voting rule about showing full proof of eligibility at the time of voting cannot lead to giving that person the ability to vote or the person's claiming proof was left at home cannot lead to giving the person the ability to vote. A person may have the right to vote, but if the person's mind is too defective to follow the rules or if the person's mind is befuddled, which leads to an error on that person's part, such as the error of leaving proof of eligibility to vote at home, the person has made the self ineligible to vote.
Number Fourteen: Repair the primary process.
In the United States of America, in the process to nominate candidates for the U.S. presidency, most of the states use the primary voting system and about a dozen use the caucus voting system. The caucus voting system, which requires people to show up for caucus meetings to make votes and can involve coercion by thuggish people and bad people on good people should be eliminated in the country. The tea-party movement should be involved in working to get the caucus voting system replaced by the primary voting system wherever possible.
Here is a fact-of-life aside. When a government entity or politician is allowed to be involved in deciding whether or not something is made, the religion of that government, which would be only one type, can be a deterrent whether or not something is made, and that is bad. For example, Islamic rules do not allow the eating of pork, so, if Islamic rules were adopted into government philosophy of this country, it could kill the pork industry in a country. (Remember: The idea of not eating pork has connection to days--ages ago--when it was unknown what trichinosis was in connection to pork, which could lead to illness in people who ate improperly cooked pork.) Religion in Europe some hundreds of years of ago helped hold back the development of science, as Galileo Galilei discovered around the early 1600s, when he had to be on house arrest for about a decade for his beliefs in science, and that shows what can happen in a country that has a particular political ideology as the predominate philosophy and that is not based on the individual--in a country with one guiding religious belief tied to the government, people not beholden to the religious belief can be hindered from getting the chance to develop things and do things, and that is a waste of minds, maybe millions of minds.
Number Fifteen: Stop the adoption of Sharia Law into daily life and daily business life.
Sharia Law is Islamic Law, and it is law that is based on one religion that is highly restrictive on the individual, and it is practiced in, for example, Saudi Arabia, and since the United States of America is not based on the ways of one religion, if Sharia Law were adopted in the United States of America, the country would no longer be based on having every individual equal under the law (for example, in Sharia Law, the female is subservient in value to the male). Sharia-Compliant Finance is a way of business in which business transactions are subject to the ways of the Qu'ran (or the Koran), and Shariah-Compliant Finance involves Sharia Supervising Boards (made up of clerics versed in Sharia Law), and such boards can determine what business venture does and does not get started or finance. (You are urged to see my document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and Barack Obama, which can be reached by using this link: Sharia.)
Number Sixteen: Get the U.S. out of agreements and keep the U.S. out of agreements with other countries that hurt the manufacturing industry and the defensive capability in the U.S.
A country to survive must have the tools of industry in existence to fight a war, if war should show up in a short period of time; in the mid 1900s, the U.S. was a country with machines shops and factories galore, and when World War II started for the U.S. in 1941, the country has the established factories and shops that could be converted to creating weapons. Since the 1980s at least, people in this country have been content to push the country into becoming a leader in information technology and let the machining industry fade away and go to other countries, and since the late 1990s, tool men, such as broaching machine repairers, have seen jobs and work disappear in this country. The U.S. must be taken out of and must stay out of international agreements that reduce and hinder the development of the factory and machine-shop industry in the country. For a country to be well rounded, it must excel in all types of study and business and have in existence all types of businesses and industries. If factories and machine shops are driven into nearly nonexistence, what is driven into nonexistence are persons with the knowledge to operate factories and machine shops who would be needed in the time of war and an abundant supply of drill presses, broaching machines, stamping machines, welding machines, et cetera that could be used in time of war. Bad politicians have been pushing through rules and laws that have led to factories and machine shops moving to other countries, and that is bad! Remember: Many men like to work with and enjoy working with materials, and when factory jobs and machine-shop jobs disappear, men have fewer opportunities to do with they like to do in life, and that stirs discontent in men and frustration in men, which is bad, since the can lead to mischief by men, and, anyway, it is up to the people of other countries to foster the development of their industries for their people or allow private industries to develop jobs and businesses, which does not happen in communist countries, where free enterprise is suppressed by high taxes and numerous laws and rules that put down initiative.
Here is a fact-of-life aside. Remember this rule of life: Sometimes, people have to be left behind. There is that old saying that hints that the meek will inherit the Earth, and, today, those meek are those who subscribe to being ruled and controlled as sheep under the ways of socialism and communism and like ideologies, and, by the way, certainly, such people will exist in the future. Today, about twenty percent of the people in the United States of America consider themselves "liberal," which might be more fully and clearly defined as "progressive," "socialist," or "Marxist," and those who believe in such ideologies are not men and women who stand up as independent individuals, and such people can drag down a society into a slave state. Since their minds cannot be changed, you have to leave them behind--to wallow in their disappointments and to curse their inability to get free cash or what they feel they deserve in life or feel they have a right to receive--as you work to stop those who promote hard what the meek are willing to accept and work stop those who have worked and are purposely working to destroy the financial structure of the country, only some of whom are John Dingell (a U.S. Representative related to Michigan), Nancy Pelosi (a U.S. Representative related to California), Harry Reid (a U.S. Senator related to Nebraska), and Barack Hussein Obama. (You are urged to see my documents entitled Enemies of the United States of America: Politicians Who Have Hurt You and Your Family by Voting "Yes" on Bad Federal Bills and The Enemies List: Killers of the United States of America, the links to which exist at the end of this document.)
Number Seventeen: Break up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into many units and sell the units to private-sector entities.
In late 2008, the federal government took control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which had been pseudo-government entities for a lot of years, and two entities are involved in the mortgage-loan business and mortgage-loan-based investment business. These two entities are the biggest entities involved in making mortgage loans available in the country. I say that both entities should be broken up--such as into a dozen parts--and sold off to the private sector of the country, since the federal government should not be involved in determining who may and who may not be allowed to get loans. For one, if the federal government does not like the political affiliation of a loan applicant, the government could deny the loan to the applicant. Also, when the government is involved in the mortgage-loan business, the government when controlled by one particular political party is very likely to make loans available, the government will very likely make bad loans or risky loans available in order to get votes (risky loans or bad loans are those that are very likely to go into default). If you look at the history of the United States of America, you will find that many people, even in the first half of the 1900s, were renters and not homeowners, and it is not necessary that everyone be a homeowner, especially if a person does not have enough income, and even today, not all persons should be given a loan for a home because of their personalities or ways of life (like that of showing a history of not paying bills). (You are urged to see my document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, which gives information about how the Democratic Party and Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae were instrumental in the cause of the economic crash of 2008, and the document can be reached by using the link at the end of this document.)
Here is a fact-of-life aside. No politician or a government entity can, in most cases, evaluate the potential intelligence of a person and then translate what is believed by the politician or government entity into a useful decision about the person. Minds are complex and can change and develop from day to day and from year to year, and events that take place--either directly indirectly to a mind--can vary the speed at which the mind may or may not develop and take up higher and higher levels of thought. No government bureaucrat or employee can make a prediction about what will do well for a career of any person, because the variables that can be involved are uncountable and can be considered infinite in number and are not fully known, since the variables exist over what can be decades to decades to come. And in the end, an important driving force in a person can be what the person likes or learns to like to do, if given the chance to experience many things and given a chance to choose from the things known (a when a centralized government keeps low the possibilities available, which happens in such countries as Cuba and Haiti, people have fewer option from which to choose).
Number Eighteen: Get rid of the Department of Education of the federal government.
There is no reason for a Department of Education in the federal government; the Department of Education in the federal government was created in 1976 and started operating in 1980. One reason that the U.S. Department of Education should be shut down is, when the federal government is involved in determining educational policies, it can be involved in political indoctrination of students throughout the nation, or when a bad administration is in power in the federal government, a lot of damage can be done to students through what political policies are pushed (by the way, during at least the first year in the office of the U.S. Presidency for Barack Obama, people were pushing on students all over the nation the idea that Barack Obama and his policies were good, such as through Channel One, information about which can be found in my document entitled T.H.A.T. #69, which can be reached by using this link: T.H.A.T. #69). The upper level of hierarchy for education related to a particular state should be no higher than the state level, then the citizens in the state have more control over what is done in the public schools of the state and, if the policy adopted in one state is defective or somewhat defective, only students in that state may be affected (if a national policy turns out to be defective, students in all the states can be affected adversely). Also, there is no reason to funnel money in the form of taxes from the states to a national entity to run educational polices. Education should be as much as possible a local issue or state issue.
Note: You are urged to see the section called "Forced Learning of Arabic" my document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and Barack Obama to learn how the U.S. Department of Education under the control of Barack Obama has been working to force the Arabic language and culture on students--such as through a mandatory program for students in Mansfield, Texas--and the document can be reached by using this link: Sharia.
Number Nineteen: Disallow the government from controlling the student-loan business.
In September 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill--the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act--that would drastically change the student-loan industry in the country--by giving the U.S. government a monopoly over the issuing of loans for education in the country, and the U.S. Senate now has the bill. When a government is involved in controlling the issuing of student loans, the prevailing political ideology of the ranking politicians of the moment can determine who and who does not get a loan, and when a government is involved in controlling the issuing of student loans, the government can determine to what line of study a loan can and cannot be applied, which means the government can determine what type of work a particular person may take up. The federal government should not be involved in determining who and who does not get student loans. In a country in which the government does not control who and who does not get loans, number entities, such as numbers different banks, can exist, giving a person who is searching for a loan a number of possible places at which to apply for loans and giving the person who is searching for a loan a better chance of getting a loan, since there is competition in the marketplace, and if the government does not own or control the banking industry, politics is kept out of the loan process, and loans are based on whether or not the issuer of loans is willing to take on the risk of issuing loans.
Here is a fact-or-life aside. Life is complex and is always changing, or what I want you to understand is progress in business and the makeup of things keeps advancing, such as through technical advancements, and, generally speaking, fields of study are advancing all the time in the United States of America because millions of minds are involved in continually doing things, and because change is always happening, it is hard to predict what will be the future. Government cannot keep up with and cannot know what is required to succeed in a field and what will be required to succeed in a field in the future, especially if the field does not exist and a person must yet create it.
Number Twenty: Get rid of busing to move students from bad schools to better schools and simply make all schools better, especially the bad schools.
When I was growing up and going to grade school, I walked or ran between home and school, and even though some of the schools were a little more than a mile and a half way, there was no reason to be driven in a bus to school, even on really cold days--since I got dressed in a way to be protected from the cold--and, yes, there were days when I could used a bicycle. Today, when I travel in rural areas of Michigan, buses are used to get children to and from schools, and the buses are necessary because children can live many miles away from grade school, but buses are also used in urban areas to move students to and from school, even children who live less than a mile from school. In the mid-1900s, politicians, especially Democrats, pushed to get children bused to school, and it was done--Democrats let it be known publicly--to get children who were in bad schools to better schools, and, of course, work was not done to improve bad schools and money was not used to make schools better but to buy buses and fuel to move children around. (Today, the illiteracy rate for adults in Detroit, Michigan, is around fifty percent, and you can learn more about the death of Detroit by seeing my document entitled Detroit and Death: A View of a Future United States of America, which can be reached by using this link: Detroit). In essence, forced busing has caused children to be fatter than children of the past were, since they do not move as much as children did in the past, such as when I was growing up in the 1960s, and forced busing has put off work to fix bad schools, and forced busing has wasted energy (such as diesel fuel), and forced busing has wasted the time of students, who can end up on buses for many hours a week to travel to school buildings that are far away, though other school buildings are closer. Forced busing based on accomplishing some type of equality in education by simply moving bodies to different places should be discontinued.
Here is a fact-of-life aside. Enemies must be beaten down fully and completely. One of the worst types of enemies that a society can have is the teacher who purposely works to undermine the society by preaching ways to children that, ultimately, enslave people to falsehoods and lies and the ways of enslavers, such as communists. In the process to rid schools of teachers who are enemies of the country, people must not care that removing those teachers will hurt the teachers economically or psychologically--enemies are expendable--and when a teacher who is an enemy is to be removed, any person involved in process to remove the teacher should expend no sympathetic thought about the teacher's possible difficult plight after being removed from the job. And so it goes in life!
Number Twenty-one: Purge the bad books from the public grade schools.
In early 2009, the tea-party movement began and, as the days went on, the tea-party movement grew larger and larger, as people became aware of the evilness of the main players in the Democratic Party, especially Barack Obama, and since December 2009, I have been promoting the idea that the tea-party movement get involved in pushing to make recall of U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives possible, but I also have another important job for the tea-party movement. The tea-party movement, which has gotten people organized, should be used to get people to review in their areas the books that are being used in the public schools, where books that do not promote the United States of America and even put down the United States of America are being used to indoctrinate children toward the ideas that are alien to the country, and then get those books removed from the public schools--through protests and whatever other means need to be done. Certainly, the tea-party movement should work to get citizens and patriots to remove books that push the idea that manmade global warming or manmade climate change is happening and the world is at risk because of it, the idea that capitalism is bad or that some system that is opposed to capitalism, such as a government-controlled business system, is good, and the idea that Barack Hussein Obama, known to practice the ideas of such political ideologies as communism, Marxism, and fascism, should be praised or saluted or bowed down to. Keep in mind: Business books should be about true business practices, promote capitalism, and explain all the main principles of capitalism, and science books should contain true science and logic and not pseudo science or information organized around lies and distorted facts, which manmade global warming or manmade climate change has been shown to be through the revelations of "Climate-gate," which must be widely taught to children--taught to children at as early an age as possible--to show how evil people who profess to be scientists and are not trustworthy scientists and who are based within the country and outside the country can do work to enslave and hurt people, especially children. When a government suppresses the publication or distribution of books, it is censorship and dangerous for the citizens of that country, but when people work to purge general text books of lies and political propaganda out of the schools attended by children, they are defending the country and making the lives of their children better. (To learn about "Climate-gate," you should see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this link: Carbon.)
Here is a fact-of-life aside. No person can truly know all the wishes and dreams of any other person and, certainly, all other persons, and no person can know all the skills of any other person or all other persons, and given that, no person is smart enough to be able to control well the lives of millions of people, and the person who thinks he is able to or tries to has a truly ill mind. Given that, I can say that no government entity or politician can know what is best for a particular individual or can know all the talents and skills and potential of a particular individual.
Number Twenty-two: Fight against the NEA and challenge and reduce the authority of the NEA..
The National Education Association (or the NEA) is a left-wing labor group that represents teachers, but, politically, it does not really represent the teachers of the country as a whole; for example, in 2009, the Web site for the NEA was promoting the book entitled Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, which was written by Saul Alinsky (a known communist), as something that should be read, and the values of the book are not upheld by all teachers, and the values should not be upheld by any teacher in the United States of America. The NEA can influence what materials are taught to children and even what teachers be allowed to teach children, and it is an entity that supports the Democratic Party, such as Barack Obama, a man who has been highly detrimental to the United States of America. Since the NEA is a union, it cannot be outlawed, but good people in the country must see that the NEA as an enemy of the United States of America and fight against the policies promoted by the NEA that have ties to communism, socialism, Marxism, et cetera by being aware what political policies are showing up in teachings presented in the classroom and in books, and when the bad policies are seen, the good people should work to eliminate them from curricula, and that means parents must pay closer attention to what is being taught to children than parents have in the past and must work to mute what the NEA is doing that is counter to what country is about and counter to the ways of The U.S. Constitution.
Here is a fact-of-life aside. Communist countries and like countries have governmental systems in which the ways of life for the individuals are controlled by a few. In a general sense, it means that the government--a central body of a few--can determine what line of education toward getting a career a person may follow, what job a person may apply for, what job a person may have, and what job a person may do, and it means that an individual is not free to try--try for the self, though maybe failure--to get work in a certain field and later switch to a different field or create a new field, all based on decisions and knowledge about the world as it is around the person at any given moment, which can be the problems of the world, the problems in the economy in the country or home town, the failures of others, the rules of government, the ways of the family, et cetera.
Number Twenty-three: Learn and understand the limits of the knowledge of politicians and restrict their ability to make decisions that affect you and your family.
Generally speaking, a politician knows rules of politics and may know at least some of the laws that do and do not exist at a given moment, but a politician is very unlikely to know about so many other fields of study, such as electrical engineering and mechanical engineering, so what decisions may be made by politicians about things are often flawed decisions, since the politicians of today lack enough general knowledge to make proper decisions, correct decisions, and useful decisions for the long run, and, incidentally, today, many upper-level politicians in the Barack Obama administration have no experience in the private sector as business people and are nothing more than left-wing political ideologues and academics (Barack Obama is surrounded by a team of defective people, as I show in the document entitled THE CRUD AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like Minds Get Together", which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document, and because of the type of people that Barack Obama keeps around him, he indirectly defines himself--as a defective man).
Here is a fact-of-life aside. There are two main types of toughness--toughness of body and toughness of mind--and the latter is more important than the former; for example, a man may be six-feet tall and weigh two-hundred-fifty pounds, but that does not mean the man is tough enough mentally to defeat through actions of the mind evil politicians. It will take mentally strong patriots to defeat the socialists, communists, Marxists, fascists, Islamic radicals, and black radicals that now exist within the government. (You are urged to see my document entitled Patriots of the U.S.A. and the Counter-Counter Revolution, which can be reached by using this link: Patriots.)
Number Twenty-four: Repair the damage done to the United States of America by Barack Hussein Obama.
During 2008 and 2009, some prominent Democrats and others have publicly called Barack Hussein Obama a "genius," and I say that Barack Hussein Obama is no genius, and, in fact, I call Barack Hussein Obama an enemy of the United States of America, because I have deduced Barack Hussein Obama has purposely hurt the United States of America through the actions he has taken since at least January 20, 2009 (even before January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama had done damage to the country as a U.S. Senator or as a "community-activitist" lawyer, such as in relation to the home-loan industry), and I say that doing the damage that he has done does not take great intelligence. In 2009, one of the things Barack Hussein Obama did was sign an Executive Order that allows U.S.-taxpayer funds to be used for abortions in foreign countries, and another of the things that Barack Hussein Obama did was reduce the ability of U.S. security officials, such as CIA staffers, to collect information about foreigners who wish to physically damage Americans (you should see my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this link: History). Really, it takes less effort for a man with an ill mind--like Barack Hussein Obama--to damage this country through rules and laws and orders than you might think, and that is because of the rule of life that notes that it is always harder to build up something than to tear down something, as can be seen by how much work it takes to build a house and now little work it takes to demolish a house. First, the patriots of the country will have to do hard work to get people elected who have the nerve and strength and willingness to eradicate, dismantle, and close down agencies and programs that Barack Hussein Obama has created or adjusted within the federal government, and then the elected people will have to do hard work to fulfill their obligations. Since evidence exits that Barack Hussein Obama has been purposely working to hurt the United States of America, a patriot must act on the premise that everything that Barack Hussein Obama has done and will do is going to be detrimental to the country over the long run and must be undone!
Here is a thought, which is not numbered, that sort of sums up the previous "improvement topics," and the idea is about getting the government out of the business of "risk management" for the individual and society.
Let me run through a number of statements. When a person is a baby and is learning to walk, the person will probably fall down a number of times and might knock the forehead against a coffee table. When a person takes up the idea of learning to ride a bicycle, the person will probably fall off the bicycle and get hurt--at least little--and, through the years of riding the bicycle, the person may get hurt (for example, the person may stub a toe while pedaling, bruise a leg while getting on a bicycle, or die in an accident with a car). When a person chooses to be an actor on television and be the featured performer on a television series, the person may not become a featured performer on a television series, because the person is an alcoholic, the person is no pretty enough, the person is not likable to the camera, or the person gets ill and dies before getting a chance to be a featured performer on a television series. A person may wish to be a doctor, and the person may study for years and become a doctor, and, then, the person may be get sued for a decision made while being a doctor and lose the license to be a doctor. If a person chooses to play hockey, the person could get broken bones and damaged teeth and get into fights while playing hockey. A person may wish to be a motocross star, but during a race, a piston rod can crack or the drive train could seize up, and the person could have an accident and never finish the big race. A person may choose to become a garage mechanic, and the person may become a garage mechanic, and while working one day, the person could crush a finger when a tool slips. A person can choose to go fly fishing, and the person could end up with a fishing hook in the arm, because of how the hook and line flew back. A person can invent some type of device and spend money in an attempt to make some versions of the devices and sell them, and people could find the device inconvenient or, in the long run, unlikable, and so the person's work can lead to lost of money and time. A person can decide to open up a hair salon, but the cost of running the salon over a two-year period could be higher than the amount of money taken in over the two-year period (because the number of customer drops off after the first year because of an unexpected big recession, which was caused by government policies or because taxes were raised), so the person must close down the salon or go bankrupt. You may see a potential mate, and you may spend money and time to make that potential mate your mate--your sexual partner--but what you hope for and what comes to be may not mate.
Any action taken by a person in life involves risk--the possibility that there may be failure--but if the person takes no risk, nothing is accomplished or created or developed, and, in life, a person makes the determination about how much risk is worthwhile or too much, knowing the self, such as talents and skills, health, and physical stature or nature, and no one can determine the acceptable risk for the individual, and, in life, a particular person may try and try and try for years to achieve success, which may never come, but that decision to continually try, which can involve using and expending all monetary resources and energies, can only be made well by the person.
Keep this in mind: It took forty main tries to come up with "WD-40" (the lubricant), and it took dozens and dozens to tries to come up with the right material for the filament for the first useful incandescent light bulb, and, in both cases, it was individuals who took the risk in trying to come up with the right answers.
Here are reasons why it is risky to have government involved in setting risk or defining the level of risk. Although a government entity can have nearly inexhaustible resources, the government entity will always lack the drive to succeed--spurred on by possible failure--like that of the driven individual, and that means that the possibility for success from a government entity will always be lower than the possibility for success for the individual is. In addition, the goal of government is to control, but the goal of evil politicians is to control as much as possible the daily lives of other people, because, for one, the evil politicians have to keep others from possibly becoming seen as better than they are so that the self worth of the politicians is kept high in their minds, and evil politicians have to keep others from doing things that are unlikable to the evil politicians, such as, maybe, going bowling, and evil politicians have to keep ways of others from touching them and infecting them, and evil politicians have to keep others living in ways the put the people in positions where they have to praise the evil politicians--all that is a dangerous illness of the mind, of course--and to control people, evil politicians must raise the level of risk for the individual or discourage the taking of risk by the individual or teach the individual that the person's taking risk will very likely lead to failure.
Getting the government out of risk management covers all ranges of life, but I will only note three main areas--business operation, employment, and health.
The federal government should not control what businesses do or do not make or create, because of the narrow mindedness of government, which would rely on too few choices based on the minds of too few people (bureaucrats) and which would not allow customers to have more choices from which to chose when making decisions about what is good and what is bad, or, in other words, it means that the government would not risk experimenting with various choices for customers and would not risk as much money on development as private-sector entities would, and Cuba and North Korea are good examples of countries in which centralized government control has led to lack of food, products, and a wide range of businesses (and, to make a sports comparison, I add that Cuba and North Korea are countries in which good "farm-team" systems for business operators have been unable to develop, developing out of individuals working for themselves all over the place when individuals are spurred on to do so).
A person can have many talents, and it is up to the mind of that particular person to know and choose what talents to use and develop toward getting a job or jobs and keeping a job or jobs during the lifetime, and no one can predict what talents within a person will do well or best for the person over a lifetime, so no government entity or politician should determine what career or job that a person should or should not have or should or should not attempt to gain, and, without a doubt, no government entity can eliminate the risk in employment--when a person attempts to be involved in some type of career, choosing the risk involved for the self, the person may or may not reach the goal, and that can come because of one of many factors or because of more than one factor, one of which should never be related to government intervention or manipulation of the marketplace through rules and legislation, such as that which promotes one group of people over another by lowering the standards for that one group of people over other groups.
You cannot state how long you are going to live or guess correctly how long you are going to live, and no other person or entity--except for maybe a killer--can know when you are going to die, and when you choose to have an operation, even if you are twenty years of age, there is a risk that you could die because of the operation or die for some other reason very soon after getting the operation, and that means there is a risk that the thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars that could be spent on an operation for you could be for naught because you die days later, but there is a better chance that, after having an operation, you could live for months or years or decades--and live well or live better than you would have if you had not had the operation--and, given that, I say that the federal government should not be allowed to make determinations about risk involving whether or not an operation for a particular person would be cost effective, probably based on a mathematical formula, as is done in England, and that the government should not be involved in determining how to risk money on the life of an individual, such as deciding what would be an acceptable risk or unacceptable risk of money to make a life better, no matter what the age of the individual.
Several main ways are used by government to manage risk. Government can simply outlaw something from being done, such as by disallowing people from installing certain types of windows, disallowing people from using two-cycle internal combustion engines, disallowing people from building nuclear power plants, and disallowing people from burning coal. By taxing people too much, the government reduces the resources available to individuals for attempting attempt risk on an invention and reduces the chances of success for individuals--stalled by lack of money that might be used--or by taxing people too much, government is able make risk too high for individuals to start things so that the government can control the daily lives of people and what people are able to do.
And that is the document as it exists for your eyes at the moment. From time to time in the future, you should see whether or not a newer version of the document exists at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, the main address to which is www.hologlobepress.com, and at the end of this document is a link to the Web site for The Hologlobe Press. To see more ideas about what needs to be changed in the United States of America to make the United States of America better, you should see the book entitled Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto, which was published and released in March 2009, and through permission of Mark R. Levin, who is the author of the book, "The Conservative Manifesto" portion of the book is available for free on the Internet, and I have even typed out an HTML version for you, and it is available at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, and to reach my HTML version of the "The Conservative Manifesto," you can use this link: Manifesto.
P.S.: This document has been another way in which I could promote Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto, which many persons in the main media of the country have avoided talking about since the book was published.
Note: This document was originally posted on the Internet on January 19, 2010.
Note: This document is known on the Internet as www.hologlobepress.com/tactics.htm.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Conservatism for
Children and What Conservatism Means,
which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Madness in a President
and Other Matters of a Defective Mind,
which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled Nonsense Statements
and Quotations of Barack Obama, which
can be reached by using this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled THE CRUD AROUND
BARACK OBAMA: My Rule--"Like
Minds Get Together", which can be
reached through this link: Crud.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The Status of Barack
Obama: A Little Logic Puzzle, which can
be reached by using this link: Status.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The Evil and Sick
Mind of Barack Obama: A Look at His
Insidious and Treacherous Ways
(Attacking Real Scientists, the U.S.
Military, and More), which can be reached
by using this link: Evil.
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled Enemies of the United
States of America: Politicians Who Have
Hurt You and Your Family by Voting
"Yes" on Bad Federal Bills, which can be
reached by using this link: Enemies.
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled The Enemies List:
Killers of the United States of America,
which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled A Little History of
Barack Obama Events: A Show of
Deconstruction, which can be reached by
using this link: History.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Lessons for Children
about Politics and Dangerous People,
which can be reached by using this
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The Next Elections:
What Has to be Done to Protect the
United States of America, which can
be reached by using this link: Elections.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled World Tyranny:
Warnings about the Insane Who are
Trying to Create a Communist World
Country, which can be reached by
using this link: World.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled THOUGHTS AND
PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual
woman and the individual man, which
can be reached by using this link: Logic.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Justice for All?: The
Rules are Changing Under Barack
Obama, which can be reached by using
this link: Justice.
Note: Many other documents exist at the
Web site for The Hologlobe Press that will
give you information about the bad that Barack
Obama and his associates are doing to the
United States of America, such as the Michigan
Travel Tips documents and the T.H.A.T.
documents that have been published since
the fall of 2008.
To get to the Site-Summary Page for The
Site-Summary Page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may use this link: Summary.
To get to the main page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may click on this link now: