"Diversity"--In Relation to Politics,
Diversity is for the Ignorant and the Stupid
and often Leads to Bad Government
by
Victor Edward Swanson,
publisher
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
The United States of America
copyright c. 2018
December 14, 2018
(Version 1)
(Draft version)
"Diversity"--this word is commonly used in relation to politics in the United States America. Often the word is used by stupid people and ignorant people and bad people to sell the idea that, in politics, there should be diverse thoughts in governing, but what is really meant is there should be diverse people--in relation to skin color and heritage--in control of government entities, no matter how bad the ideas of the people are, and, in other words, it means a government should be made up of all types of people--especially women, blacks, gays, et cetera--and the diverse people should be installed in government jobs simply because of their physical natures. It must be remembered that, just because the skin colors or heritages of a group of leaders is different, they can all be tied to the same political ideas of nonsense or the same bad political ideas. Since 1776, it has become well known by good men and good women of the world what are good political systems or political ideas and what are bad political systems or political ideas. Communism, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, and Sharia (which is a political system--tied to Islam--masquerading as a religion) are all bad political systems, and all are forms of enslavism, and the main goal of those political systems is to set up a country so that governments are in complete control of the societies or countries and in complete control of the lives of the citizens (those ruled over), and, really, the leaders are nothing more than people who consider themselves elites, who believe they should be the rulers because of what they think they are. The rulers heading enslavism forms of government are usually ignorant people who have been educated in limited subjects and in subjects that have no real knowledge toward running countries and societies well, such as political science and law and sociology; in essence, the rulers heading enslavism forms of government no nothing about medicine, mechanics, business and making things, et cetera, which are fields of knowledge when existing in a person will very likely help the person make decisions that would do well for the society or country, and, in fact, the rulers can care not whether they do or do not know, focused on power for them and the power structure around them. Plus, when a society or a country becomes large, having millions and millions of persons, the society or the country is too complex for a single person or a group of persons to do well for it through decisions--for instance, a single brain cannot handle to countless issues of life for millions and millions--and when a society and a country becomes large, having millions and millions of persons, the society or the country can become clogged with bureaucratic dead weight and confused operations, and, in fact, the only way for a leader or a group of leaders to get and keep control is to use violence, especially when decisions lead to failure. It must be kept in mind that many politicians, even in the United States of America, get into politics so that they do not have to make a living through working, and, usually, those persons have no real skills at doing anything else, and those persons are very likely to get into government so that they can be protected by government and use government to hurt others, and the people often get in government jobs because of, in essence, their popularity, such as their physical looks and other matters not related to thinking and knowledge. By the way, history shows that people who follow the ways of communism, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, and Sharia are not altruistic, having, for instance, empathy for others, since a person who follows the ways and promotes as good the ways of communism, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, and Sharia cannot be altruistic and have the feelings of others well in mind--it is impossible. The less control that a government has on a society, the better it is for the society, because then the minds of the citizens are more free to try things in life and think and create, unrestricted by the beliefs of the leaders, such as a king, who can be tied to tribal ways, the history of which goes back generations, and when the government has less control of the moneys of the people, the people have more resources that can be used to experiment with ideas in their heads, creating what government people are incapable of creating or dreaming about, and when a government is limited in what it can control and how much it can control, the fewer people who will hurt when the government makes defective rulings and laws. People who promote limited governments or promote having politicians limited in what they can do, especially do to the citizens, promote "anti-enslavism" forms or government, such as that which was outlined in The United States Constitution in the late 1700s, and the people can be called "anti-enslavists" and even "conservatives" [Note: "Conservative"--the definition of this word can have different meanings in other countries, and here the only meaning is that tied to the United States of America.]. The idea of "conservatism" is a political system, related to how a government should be set up, and "capitalism" is not an interchangeable word with the word "conservatism," since "capitalism" is not a political system--"capitalism" is related to economics, and "capitalism" within a "anti-enslavism" form of society is something in which the government has little say so in, for example, how businesses operate, who gets to run the businesses, and what businesses make and do not make, and the government is not involved in non-common-sense taxing practices and unrealistic taxing practices or over-taxing practices. In a good "anti-enslavism" form of the government, there is and should be little real diversity of thought in the politicians' guiding principles for the country, who are limited in what their jobs are and can be because of a constitution-type document--that is, the ways of anti-enslavism are set down in law for the most part, but with an anti-enslavism form of government, the politicians can have different skin colors and heritages, and, in other words, the minds of the politicians in an anti-enslavism form of government are, for the most part, non-diverse, and they do not have to be diverse, since the progress of the country is driven by what the citizens do and do not do, especially in relation to economics and what their goals in life are. A country with a set of politicians with a wide diversity of political ideas can lead to a collage of confusion, because rotten political ideas can muddle up what gets done and should be done. In this day and age, some people believe "diversity" leads to "democracy" or more "diversity" leads to more "democracy," but that is an idiotic idea, especially if more and more of the so-called diverse people, based on only their looks and sexual preferences, support rotten forms of government or rotten political ideas. A person who pushes for "diversity" can be considered stupid or ignorant or should be seen as a very bad person.
###
Note: This document was originally posted on the Internet on December 14, 2018.
Note: This document is known on the Internet as www.hologlobepress.com/diverse.htm.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Conservatism for
Children and What Conservatism Means,
which can be reached by using this link:
Conservatism.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Conservatives and
The United States Constitution Versus
Enslavers and Enslavism (Communism,
Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can
be reached by using this link: Enslavism.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The "Enslavers" Want
Your Retirement Plan or Pension Plan,
which can be reached by using this link:
Pension.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Nonsense Statements
and Quotations of Barack Obama, which
can be reached by using this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Madness in a President
and Other Matters of a Defective Mind,
which can be reached by using this link:
Madness.
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-
Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and
Barack Obama, which can be reached by
using this link: Sharia.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Never Forget These
Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the
Individual in the United States of
America, which can be reached by
using this link: Media.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled A Little History of
Barack Obama Events: A Show of
Deconstruction, which can be reached by
using this link: History.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Lessons for Children
about Politics and Dangerous People,
which can be reached by using this
link: Children.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The Next Elections:
What Has to be Done to Protect the
United States of America, which can
be reached by using this link: Elections.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled World Tyranny:
Warnings about the Insane Who are
Trying to Create a Communist World
Country, which can be reached by
using this link: World.Note: Many other documents exist at the
Web site for The Hologlobe Press that will
give you information about the bad that Barack
Obama and his associates are doing to the
United States of America, such as the Michigan
Travel Tips documents and the T.H.A.T.
documents that have been published since
the fall of 2008.To get to the Site-Summary Page for The
Site-Summary Page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may use this link: Summary.
To get to the main page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may click on this link now:
www.hologlobepress.com.
###