Reasons That the Democratic Party is a
Dangerous and Corrupt Entity That Must
be Crushed and Destroyed


Victor Edward Swanson,

The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan  49721
The United States of America

copyright c. 2011

October 26, 2011
(Version 8)
(Draft version)

    On June 6, 1944, Canadian soldiers, British soldiers, and American soldiers landed by sea on France on what was called "D-Day," and it was a day when, for one, American soldiers stormed "Omaha Beach" against German enemies, and when the American soldiers landed, they rushed out of the landing craft and were attacked by bullets and shrapnel, and some American soldiers got shot in the face and died, and other American soldiers had to walk right over them to get to the beach (evidence of that can be found in the many documentaries that tell the tales of the day and days that followed, the most recent documentary of which that I saw is entitled Detroit: Our Greatest Generation, which was shown on WDIV-TV, Channel 4, Detroit, Michigan, on December 16, 2009).  The American soldiers were fighting an enemy or enemies, which is the way of life--in life, good and honorable men have enemies and must fight them and, if necessary, bury them in the ground, and sometimes good and honorable men die in such battles.  Today, there is a war going on in the United States of America between (1) good and honorable men and women (2) and the men and women of the Democratic Party and all the people who have ties with and support the Democratic Party, and the biggest enemy is Barack Hussein Obama, a corrupt and evil man whose ways and ideologies are a combination of the worst of what a man can be.

    Evil is commonplace in the world.  Russia is a communist country, though it might be defined as a "semi-presidential democratic republic" (as noted in Wikipedia), which, in its current form, came about through the break down of the Soviet Union on December 26, 1991, and Russia is a place where opposition media is under pressure to be quiet, which is the way of a communist country, and Russia is a country that has had to deal with food shortages, as had the Soviet Union, and that is because of centralized control of the food-producing industry.  China (the People's Republic of China) is a communist county, which came to be a communist country through a civil war, and this country has been controlled by the communist party of the country since October 1, 1949, and since then the government of China has killed millions of persons of the country (somewhere between 30 million and 50 million persons or so).  Cuba, which exists about ninety miles south of Florida (of the United States of America) is a communist country, and it really began to fall apart in 1959, and soon after 1959, the government seized private property and nationalized the public utilities, and since the mid-1960s, the power in the country has been Fidel Castro, and, today, Cuba imports about eighty percent of the food that is needed, and that is one result of centralized government control of people.  In essence, Cyprus and Nepal are communist countries; Cyprus has been since 2001, and Nepal since 2008.  North Korea has been a communist country since 1959, and North Korea is a place where, when a person is flying high above the surface of the Earth near where North Korea is, there is little evidence of development as a civilization as indicated by light emitted from cities and towns when compared with South Korea, and North Korea is a place where citizens have had a hard time getting food over the last ten years (at least), because, for one, the government--a government of centralized control of daily life--uses money for military purposes instead of for food for the citizens.  Iran is a Radical Islamic state, becoming that on April 1, 1979, and it is operated by Radical Muslim clerics, the head of which is known as a "supreme leader"; there is an elected president who is the highest state authority of the country, but, really, the control comes from behind the scenes, and the strict Islamic law makes women subservient to men.  Venezuela is headed by dictator, Hugh Chavez (Hugo Chavez Frias), and he has taken over industries and shut down media outlets critical of him.  Zimbabwe is an economic mess because of its political policies, basically the policies of a dictator, Robert Mugabe (who is at least a hard-line socialist); there is strict censorship in the country (for instance, foreign broadcast entities cannot exist in the country and newspapers from the West are banned), and the country has been in decline under Robert Mugabe since the early 1990s.  Saudi Arabia is controlled by a Radical Islamic family.  A number of countries in the world are heavily socialistic, and some of those are Syria, Libya, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh, and many other countries of the world have taken on or are taking on socialistic policies and themes, such as England and Canada, both of which have defective the health-care systems because they are run by the government (in both countries because of mathematical-based systems that determine whether or not care is given, senior citizens can be denied care, though they might actually live better or well for years and, for instance, live for many more decades, and cancer is one of the diseases that can lead to no care).

    Yes, those communists, socialists, Marxists, et cetera in the world are doing so well (I say in jest).  Despite what many of the people in the main media might try to persuade you to believe, the countries listed in the opening paragraph of this document are countries in which the people are enslaved.   Most of the countries are countries that are devolving or are being deconstructed, and some are already at the point are falling apart.  Because of ideologies, some countries have had to buy or steal technology to advance at least a little, and China is one country that is known for stealing technology, such as software technology and military technology.

    By the way, the reason drugs are cheaper in Canada than in the United States of America is the Canadian government keeps the prices down, and so companies in the United States of  America, where most drugs of the world are developed, have to charge more in the United States of America to recoup the costs of developing drugs (and it take years or a decade to get a drug into use, and one big obstacle is the federal government and its regulations), and it must be remembered many drugs that are available in the United States of America are not available in Canada, since the Canadian government and the governments of the provinces of Canada block many drugs from being available to keep costs down.

    Now, we look at the Democratic Party in the United States of America.  Barack Obama--the current head of the Democratic Party by being the U.S. President--has done things that would be done by such entities as Marxist, communists, Radical Islamists, and dictators, such as get control in banks and auto makers, and that is not the way of the United States of America as it was founded; for example, Barack Obama has taken control of American car companies, allowed foreigners to get some control of American car companies, and put in socialists and such in high-level jobs at American car companies.  The Democratic Party has passed by very expensive federal bills since January 20, 2009, and, for the most part, have pushed through the federal bills without allowing people to really see them, and some of those bills have been the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2009, and the Democratic Party has been pushing through the U.S. Congress--with little input from the Republican Party--national-health-care bills in the process to create one national-health-care act, and the Democratic Party has been using unethical means to push through the health-care bills, such as telling lies about what is in the bills to keep the American public purposely uninformed.  Truly, the Democratic Party is overspending in a great degree, and what is it doing is not good for the country, as it would not be good for a family if it were done by the family--families die through overspending.  Barack Obama has grabbed the census department and set it up under the Executive Branch, and that is a sign of a man working to be a dictator, and federal bills have existed for months in the U.S. Congress that propose to put the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (or MedPAC), which is currently an independent agency, under the control of the Executive Branch, and should MedPAC be put under the Executive Branch, Barack Obama could act more like a dictator, since he would have more power and the Legislative Branch would have less, and Barack Obama has created several dozens "czar" positions in the Executive Branch, who are not beholden to the Legislative Branch on a daily basis, and, already, it looks as if Barack Obama is pushing the Environmental Protection Agency to make rules like those that might be made by a cap-and-trade bill or cap-and-trade act, making Barack Obama more like dictator in things, particularly in things dealing with energy in the country.  Since the start of 2009 at least, members of the Democratic Party and members of the Federal Communications Commission have sent signals that they are willing to put pressure on radio stations to curtail offering information that is in opposition to the Democratic Party, especially its leader--Barack Obama--and their attacks will be directed at the conservatives and conservative-like radio talk-show hosts.  The Democratic Party, such as Al Gore, Jr., is in pushing the idea of manmade global warming so that they can tax citizens of the United States of America and make citizens poorer--all in the name of reducing carbon emissions so that they can redistribute wealth--and Barack Obama has been pushing for an international climate-change treaty that will lead to billions of dollars that are from the citizens being given to people outside the country, such as Third World countries or dictators, (or maybe to banking accounts that have ties to Barack Obama and his associates, such as Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, and Al Gore, Jr.).  The U.S. Congress--controlled by the Democrat Party--has partially pass a federal bill that would put he issuing of college loans under the direct control of the federal government, which would lead to the federal government deciding what classes a person may or may not take or what career a person may or may not take up.  The Democratic Party  is well infiltrated into the media of the country, such as CNN, NBC-TV, MSNBC, PBS, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and Detroit Free Press, and it is reached the point where many media outlets cannot be trusted for any news that is politically themed, such as news about politicians, news about proposed federal bills, and news about climate change.

    Incidentally, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reported in an article entitled "Russian Free-Press Advocate Moves to Georgia" (which was dated November 13, 2009) that Oleg Panifilov was leaving Russia for the country known as Georgia, and here is a quotation from the man: "The main reason for my moving to Georgia is the situation in Russia.  It's impossible to live in a country where the authorities lie to you, where media lies to you, and people are afraid of them...."  (You are urged to see such documents of mine as Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama, Political Lessons for the Individual Woman and the Individual Man in the United States of America, A Fallacy of Communism and Marxism: All Things Being Equal, A Collection of Words--Just Words--That Show Dangerous People, and Never Forget These Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the Individual in the United States of America, the links to which exist at the end of this document).

    And now I must report a fact about the Democratic Party and Barack Obama.  On December 21, 2009, and on days near December 21, 2009, the U.S. Senate was doing work to pass a national-health-care bill, and, on December 21, 2009, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (a Republican related to South Carolina) made a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate that stated a terrible thing that the Democratic Party and Barack Obama were trying to do--trying to sneak a new rule into existence, which would make it impossible to repeal or change provisions in the health-care bill in the future, and that is something that has not be done with a bill or law before (but it is the type of thing that a dictator would do, or a communist would do, or a Marxist would do, et cetera).  Here is a part of Jim DeMint's speech, and it should never be forgotten: "...There is one provision that I found particularly troubling, and it's under a Section C entitled 'Limitation on Changes to this Subsection.'  And I quote, 'It shall not be in order of the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection.'  This is not legislation!  This is not law!  It's a pretty big deal.  We well be passing a new law, and, at the same time, creating a Senate rule that makes it out of order to amend or even repeal the law...."  To make such a rule would be harmful to the country, since it would set a precedent, in which a law could be made and could never repealed, no matter how horrible the law was, and that shows how dangerous and evil the Democratic Party and Barack Obama are.

    I can argue well that the term "Democratic Party" has no connection to the meaning in the word "democracy," since this political party upholds beliefs that are not democratic and are not based on the rights of the individual as presented in, for one, The U.S. Constitution, which sets up the general rules of the United States of America.  People who are members of the Democratic Party or consider themselves Democrats use such labels to identify themselves as "Democrats," "liberals," and "progressives," and no matter what  labels they use, they are really communists, socialists, Marxists, et cetera, all of whom are types of people who are bent on the destruction of the United States of America as it was founded.  It must be learned and remembered communists, socialists, Marxists, et cetera are enslavers, who use government to enslave people no matter what religion and race the people are, and that is because, for one, enslavers are people who hate people.

    By the way, Radical Muslims or Radical Islamists and Radical Hispanics are also people who are like Democrats, since their cultures promote enslaving people, as can be seen in countries, such as Iran, where women are given less value than men are and can be beaten for what goes against the wishes of men--such as husbands.  (You should see my document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and Barack Obama, which can be reached by using the link at the end of this document.)

    Let me expound on something that Mark R. Levin has said at least a few times within the last year (Mark R. Levin is the host of the nationally syndicate radio show entitled The Mark Levin Show), and you may or may not have heard him say this--In essence, the Democratic Party and the government are the same entity.  The Democratic Party feeds off of and feeds the government, and the federal government feeds and feeds on the Democratic Party.  Democrats are people who relish being in government and not in the private sector, since they can rule people and can avoid having to do work as members of the private sector (where failure is an option and where they can be beholden to bosses, who are better than they are), and unlike the Republican Party, when it is under the guidance of "conservatives," the Democratic Party promotes a way for the country that involves having the government as big as possible and be involved as much as possible in the every-day life of people, and when the federal government grows, it gives the Democratic Party more power and more positions of work.  If the government were to get smaller, the Democratic Party would have to be smaller and would be smaller.   The Democratic Party pushes for taking money out of the private sector through taxes and putting the money in the control of the government, and that is because, for one, the people of the Democratic Party arrogantly feel the regular citizens of the country are stupid and the people in government are smarter than the regular citizens are, and the Democratic Party pushes for taking money out of the private sector through taxes and putting the money in the control of the government because when a person of the private sector has more money than the politician has, it is deemed the person in the private sector is more powerful or is higher in stature than the politician is (the people of the Democratic Party are more likely to be class conscious than the people in the Republican Party are, and the people of the Democrat Party make the amount of money that a person has as an important factor in calculating the value of a person).  And the Democratic Party does not promote the ways of The U.S. Constitution, which contains rules that are against the beliefs of the people who like to be enslavers, such as the members of the Democratic Party.

    The Democrat Party is more than the government and the party proper, and I now show only a few examples.  The Service Employees International Union (or the SEIU) is a union, and it is headed by a hard-line Marxist (Andy Stern), and, in fact, the head of the union is a close associate of Barack Obama's.  The National Education Association is a highly Socialist-based union made up of, for one, "teachers," and it is an organization that has promoted communism, such as the reading of Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for the Realistic Radical, which is a book written by a communist who worked to destroy the United States of America (Saul Alinsky).  The management of the American Medical Association and the management of AARP support Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, and the two organizations have promoted the passing of national-health-care bills, even though the bills would harm doctors, nurses, and hospitals.  And, of course, ACORN, for which Barack Obama worked as an attorney in 1995, is tied to the Democratic Party and the SEIU, and ACORN has been involved in a number of voter-fraud incidents, and the SEIU has made donations to ACORN, and ACORN has done work for  the SEIU.

    Now, I have to pass along a story about the Democratic Party that should never be forgotten.  On March 11, 2010, the public was hearing from radio talk-show hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Mark R. Levin, and from Republicans in the U.S. Congress, such as Michele Bachmann (a member related to Minnesota), about the "Slaughter Solution," which had come from the Democrats in the U.S. Congress, such as U.S. Representative Louise Slaughter (a Democrat related to New York), who was the chairman of the "Rules Committee" of the U.S. House of Representatives.  First you must know--a federal bill related to spending is supposed to be initiated in the U.S. House of Representatives and be voted on, and if the bill passes, the bill gets moved over to the U.S. Senate, and all bills--the actual bills--have to be voted on by the members of U.S. Congress (both houses of the U.S. Congress).  The "Slaughter Solution," as it was proposed, was to take a health-care bill that had been passed by the U.S. Senate and sort of pass it in the U.S. House of Representatives--there would be a vote on a rule change, in which if the rule change was passed, it would be deemed that the U.S. House of Representatives had passed the health-care bill of the U.S. Senate (which the House had not actually passed), and, in essence, it would have the U.S. House of Representatives pretend it had passed the bill.  For Democrats to even think about using such an idea as the "Slaughter Solution" and to talk about using such an idea as the "Slaughter Solution" in public shows how dangerous the Democrats are to the United States of America and to The U.S. Constitution, and it shows that the Democrats want to change the country into something that is far from what it was founded as--and that thing could be a dictatorship, some type of communist country (like China), or some type of Socialistic country, et cetera.  Democrats of today are enemies of the United States of America.

    On March 18, 2010, Robert Gibbs, the press spokesman for the White House, a Democrat, made a statement to a reporter in relation to the subject of the "Slaughter Solution."  The reporter was Fred Lucas of, and  Lucas brought up the subject that Mark R. Levin and his associates at the Landmark Legal Foundation were proposing to start a lawsuit if the "Slaughter Solution" were used.  Here is the banter between the two men (and the audio was obtained from The Mark Levin Show, a nationally syndicated radio show, on March 18, 2010).
    Fred Lucas: "Mark Levin with Landmark Legal Foundation has prepared suit against the President if he, if he signs the health-care bill passed by the House without a recorded yea-or-nay vote required by Article One Section Seven [of The U.S. Constitution].  Um, my question on that is, ah--Would the President rule out signing future bills, such as Immigration Reform or Finance Reform, you mentioned earlier, ah, that are not subject to a yea-or-nay vote in both Chambers?"
    Robert Gibbs: "Ah, again, this is, ah.  I think we've discussed on a number of occasions, ah, certainly the last time we met inside, ah, that this was, this is the type of thing that, dah, the type of rule you've seen, ah, pass on any number of inferences, ah....   I, I understand that there, that there are those that want to discuss this as being, ah, a unique thing, ah, it, it, it is not.  Ah, I stated earlier that, dah, when this bill passes the House, the President will be happy to sign it."
    Fred Lucas: "Well, is that still a constitutional argument for, in favor of that it's been done before?"
    Robert Gibbs: "...Ah, I, I, I'm unaware, again, I, I didn't go to law school.  I'm unaware that, dah, ah, I'm unaware of legal suits filed by a similar organization when the Republicans did, ah, similar things on legislation."
    Fred Lucas: "So, the President wouldn't rule out signing future bills that didn't pass both Houses by a yea-or-nay vote?"
    Robert Gibbs: "Ah, I'm not going to get into a, a, a series of legal hypotheticals that both of us seem unprepared to discuss...."
    Note: Mark R. Levin (a big-name lawyer) reported, after playing the audio clip--when I caught it (he played it twice), that the Republicans have never used a "Slaughter Solution"-type thing in the passed--never.  I get the impression that the Democrats would use the "Slaughter Solution" again.  The Democrats showed again why they are enemies of the United States of America.

    It was on March 23, 2010, that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was made a federal law, and right from that date, people who understood how bad the law was began their attack against it, such as through court cases.  One federal court case would ultimately have twenty-six states grouped together to fight the constitutionally of the act, and one constitutional problem with the act is that it made it law that a private citizen would have to buy something--in this case health-care insurance--from an entity, and never before was there a law that forced citizens to buy anything.  On January 31, 2011, a federal judge in Florida ruled that, indeed, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Act of 2010 was unconstitutional, and the ruling meant that the twenty-six states had won and the act was null and void.  However, the Barack Obama administration, even though the law had been ruled dead, continued to implement it, disregarding the court ruling and violating constitutional ways, and, in essence, Barack Obama was acting lawlessly (you are urged to be my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this link: Health).
    Note: On February 7, 2011, another federal judge would rule the Barack Obama administration is in "contempt of court" in relation to an oil-drilling ban that the Barack Obama administration had imposed.

    On February 17, 2011, the State Senators of Wisconsin left Wisconsin, going to Illinois, such as the Best Western Clock Tower Resort, to block a vote on a bill--promoted by the Governor Scott Walker (a Republican)--from being passed (and you can learn more about the bill my seeing my document entitled Patriots of the U.S.A. and the Counter-Counter Revolution, which can be reached by using this Patriots link), and on Tuesday, February 22, 2011, Democrats of the Indiana House of Representatives of Indiana left Indiana so that they could block the state government from working, and some of them ended up at Urbana, Illinois.  Remember: The Democrats in the U.S. Congress had pushed through--in at least one unconstitutional way--the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, but the Republicans who were in the U.S. Congress at the time did not run away, such as to another country, to stop the passing of what would become shown to the public to be a bad law (you should see my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this link: Health).  And now you have more evidence of what the Democratic Party is--it will block the ability of government to run by running away.

    On February 23, 2011, The Right Scoop ( posted video that was a segment of a informal speech made to union members by U.S. Representative Michael Capuano (a Democrat related to Massachusetts), and here is a text version of the video clip: "...Today is a great day for all of us.  But let's be serious.  It's not about just one rally, not about a couple of nuts in the background who want to take it all away from you.  I'm proud to be here with people who are willing to stand up.  I proud to be here with people who understand that it's more than just sending an e-mail to get you goin'.  Every once and a while, you gotta get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary...."  Here, I show you evidence of a member of the U.S. House of Representatives--a member of the Democrat party, which is headed by a communist known as Barack Obama--pushing for violence.

    What does the Democratic Party stand for or promote for a political system?  I say that it pushes for and promotes "enslavism," which encompasses such themes as communism, socialism, thugism, and gangsterism (like the gangsterism that is commonplace in inner-city "black" areas). The United States Constitution is not a political system related to "enslavism," and that is why most certainly the heads of or the high-ranking members of the Democratic Party act against the ways of The United States Constitution and put down the document.  On October 12, 2011, U.S. Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. (a Democrat related to Illinois and the son of the radical-minded black known as Reverend Jesse Jackson) spoke words, which were given to Nicholas Ballasy of The Daily Caller, that showed his disdain for The United States Constitution and his wish to violate The United States Constitution, though he--upon becoming a U.S. Representative--took an oath to uphold the ways of The United States Constitution.  For one, Jesse Jackson Jr. said: "...Now, now, we're making some, some progress.  President Obama, ah, tends to, um, ah, ah, idolize--and rightly so--Abraham Lincoln, who looked at states in rebellion, and he made a judgment that the government of the United States, while the states are in rebellion, still had an obligation, ah, to function.  On several occasions now, we've seen quite frankly the Congress is in a rebellion, determined as Abraham Lincoln said--to wreck or ruin at all costs.  I believe quite frankly in the direct hiring of fifteen-million unemployed Americans.  At forty-thousand dollars a head--some more than forty-thousand, some less than forty-thousand--that's a six-hundred-billion dollar stimulus.  It could be a five-year program.  For another hundred-and-four-hundred-billion dollars, we bail out all of the states.  The problem within those states ends tomorrow with a hundred-and-four billion.  For another one-hundred billion, we bail out all the cities.  So for about eight-point-four-billion dollars, we put fifteen-million Americans to work, we bail out the states, and we bail out the cities, but we do it through a direct hire.  We put people to work cleaning up communities.  We put people to work through a civilian conservation corps, through a works-projects administration, because the hour demands it.  And as more people work, they pay taxes, they pay taxes into the fourth quarter, they buy wares, they buy homes, they meet their obligations, and our economy begins to work its was out of this protracted recession.  I believe that's the only way out of this crisis, and I hope that the President begins ta, cont, ca, to, begins to continue to exercise extraordinary, ah, constitutional means, based on the history of, of Congress in rebellion in the past.  Um, ah, the President had the opportunity to exercise Section Four of Fourteenth Amendment during the debt crisis, he chose not to to help the United States honor its obligations because the Congress is in rebellion.  When we recognize that the Congress is in rebellion, I think the President of the United States, ah, will follow the correct course.  He's doing that now.  He's looking at administratively for ways to advance the causes of the American people because this Congress is completely dysfunctional."  Jesse Jackson Jr. is not only an idiot but also an evil man, and let me show you why that is true.  When Abraham Lincoln was the U.S. President, the issue at hand was not a rebellious Congress--it was states that wanted to leave the union or the country--so Jesse Jackson's whole theme of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Obama was nonsense thought since no comparison can be made, as no comparison can be made between apples and oranges.  Next, Jesse Jackson promoted the idea of the federal government's becoming bigger by taking on 15-million more employees, and that reduces the number of people working in the private sector (for private-sector companies)--who make things and, overall, increase the wealth of the country--and that means the people who do not work for the government will have to cough up more taxes to cover the cost of paying for the 15-million more federal government employees, and that means 15-million more persons would be beholden to the federal government for their livelihood and lives, and that means 15-million more persons are, in essence, turned into slaves to politicians and their decisions.  It must be kept in mind--once 15-million more persons become beholden to the federal government for their lives, how do you get them off the payroll of the federal government and onto the payroll of private-sector companies?  It is hard to do.  Now, the states that are in financial crisis, such as California, are in that position because they have been run improperly, and now, Jesse Jackson Jr. wants to give them money to bail them out--at least for this year--and, also, Jesse Jackson Jr. wants bail out cities--at least for one year.  What happens next year for those states and cities whose budgets are defective and are in debt?  Unless states and cities change spending policies, they will continue to spend more than they have to spend.  You must see Jesse Jackson Jr. pushed and pushes the idea that all we have to do to make things better is take more from citizens to cover for the bad policies of politicians all over the country.  When do the bad politicians finally get stopped from doing bad work--spending too much and spending on things that are bad?  And, as a side thought, I say in jest, here--"Yes, we're all going to be janitors and clean up the streets, such as in Detroit, where crappy people have crapped in their own nests for decades."  At the end of the quoted material, Jesse Jackson Jr. began to get on the subject have Barack Obama's doing as much as possible without working with the U.S. Congress, as was shown by saying the words "...administratively for ways to advance the causes....".  Also, Jesse Jackson Jr. said: "...Absolutely, absolutely!  In the.  Declare a national emergency on the question of jobs and, and the economy!  Declare a national emergency on, on the question of unemployment.  But, at the same time, recognize the size and the scope of the problem.  Ah, if you recognize it, then, as I've heard other economists in The Wall Street Journal and even The New York Times have suggested, that the President's, ah, jobs proposal is about one-twentieth the size of the problem, so we haven't truly provided a, a, a, a national cause that generates the kind of, ah, ah, ah, mass appeal behind the jobs program that's necessary.  I support the jobs plan.  I support the President's reelection.  I support Barack Obama.  Ah, at this hour, we need a plan that meets the size and scope of, of the problem to put the American people to work."  See how Jesse Jackson Jr. through the interview was promoting the idea of having Barack Obama call for a "national emergency" so that Barack Obama could avoid working with the U.S. Congress and following the ways of The United States Constitution and so that Barack Obama could declare that things get done through "Executive Orders," the use of which Barack Obama could defend in public as having to be done as a way to save the country, though really it has been Barack Obama and the Democrats who have been instrumental in keeping the economy and the jobs picture from getting better (and I say that the idea of using such "Executive Orders" in such similar circumstances would set a bad precedent, leading to more chances U.S. Presidents would declare more events as "national emergencies" and act more often as dictators).  In addition, Jesse Jackson Jr. said: "We've got to go further.  I support what he does.  Clearly, Republicans are not going to be for it.  But if the administration can handle administratively what can be done, we should pursue it.  Ah, and if there is a, if there is a, ah, if there, if there are extra constitutional, ah, opportunities that allow the President administratively to put the American people to work, he should pursue every single one of them."  I felt while seeing a video clip of the interview that Jesse Jackson Jr. was trying to speak in a way that would give the impression that he was or is smart, and yet, he passed along all the nonsense that he did and hinted at having Barack Obama sidestep the U.S. Congress, which Jesse Jackson Jr. tried to suggest was in "rebellion," even though what has been happening in the U.S. Congress is Republicans--mostly--have been working to not follow the socialistic and communistic ways being pushed by the Democrats in the U.S. Congress and by Barack Obama, but, in essence, Jesse Jackson Jr. through the interview showed the ugliness of the mind of a Democrat--one that promotes the federal government's spending even more money (some 800-billion dollars) though the country is already deeply debt (by tens of trillions of dollars), the federal government's taking up being an "employer" related to jobs that go beyond the type of jobs that the federal government should be involved with, and Barack Obama's bypassing the U.S. Congress or Barack Obama's avoiding following the ways of The United States of America by using "extra constitutional" ways.

    The Democratic Party is clearly anti-United States of America, as I have shown in this document and have shown in other documents of my that exist at the Web site for The Hologlobe Press, and now it is evident that the Democratic Party must be crushed and destroyed.  Everyone who is a good and honorable American will have to vote during the election for 2010 and the election 2012 to simply save the country from the destructive and enslaving principles of the Democratic Party of today, which is filled with communists, Marxists, socialists, deviants, and the like, and then every good and honorable American will have to vote in the following elections so that more people who abide by the rules of The U.S. Constitution can be put in public office--from federal office, state office, and local office--so that they can kill the "reforming" being done by Barack Obama and his associates and so that they can eradicate and purge the government entities that have been filled with radicals, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, of radicals or, in other words, I state that every politician who uses the "Democrat" label or a similar label to identify the self is an enemy of the United States of America as it was founded and must be defeated in any election the politician enters, and I say that every "Democrat" means every national Democrat, every state Democrat, and every local Democrat, all of whom are expendable, since they make citizens expendable.  If the Democratic Party is not beat down and destroyed, it will continue to advance deconstruction of the United States of America as it was founded by pushing for centralized control of every-day life of every individual of the country, which will be done through more evil laws and rules, and the national rules and laws will come from the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, agencies of the Executive Branch, especially the Environmental Protection Agency, and Barack Obama, a truly dangerous and evil man and a man with an ill and defective mind, corrupted by drugs and the principles of communism, Marxism, Radical Islamic beliefs, and other radical thoughts.

    Remember some rules.  Nothing is too big to fail--the Roman Empire failed, and the Soviet Union failed, and the Democratic Party must fail through attack by the patriot of the United States of America.  Enemies do not stop being enemies--even when they are smiling.  Centralized governments do not lead to innovation and a better world, since the start of something in a government-controlled world is dependent on political rules and political beliefs or even religious beliefs, and those beliefs put obstacles in the way of individuals to be innovative and try things.  Some American men--American soldiers fighting for the United States of America--got shot in the face in 1944, and you probably will not get shot in the face when you take on the Democratic Party, but you may get threatened and may get a little bloodied, since some people, such as those of the SEIU, have beaten people and are violent people, but you are now a soldier in the fight for the United States of America, and you must expect bad to come, but while you take on the bad, you keep in your mind the joyful feeling of destroying enemies--shout them down, teach the misinformed about them, expose them as the enemies they are, block them from getting into office through your vote, vote them out of office, crush and destroy them.

    And you are urged to see my document entitled The Next Elections: What Has to be Done to Protect the United States of America, a link to which exists at the end of this document.

    P.S. #1: If the economy were to supposedly improve as reported by the federal government and the press over the next year or so, you must still do everything to wipe out the Democrat Party, since the Democratic Party--under the direction of Barack Obama--has shown that it is cannot be trusted and is dangerous and evil.

    P.S. #2: And you must be aware "enslavism" (which is made up of such subgroups as "communism" and Sharia") is becoming more and more powerful in the world, and people who support communism and Sharia are gaining more and more power in the Middle East, such as in Egypt and Turkey, and in South America, such as in Venezuela and Bolivia and even Brazil, and in the United Kingdom, which is having trouble with encroaching Sharia, and it is coming down to the point where it will soon truly be the United States of America against much of the world--and the United States of America cannot afford to have "enslavists"--such as communists like Barack Obama--in power.


"Censorship in the People's Republic of China.", 14 December 2009.

"China.", 19 December 2009.

"Communist state.", 18 December 2009.

"The consequences of Russia's looming food shortage."  Asia Times OnLine, 24 March 2000.  (

"Cuba.", 16 December 2009.

"Discussing Chavez government's takeover of Venezuelan television station, Boyle asserted.  'This is what the speech Nazis want.'"  Colorado Media Matters, 27 May 2007, 3:05 p.m. MST.  (

"Ethnic unrest in China leads to mass arrests.", 7 July 2009, 3:31 a.m. EDT.  (

"File: Korean peninsula at night.jpg.", 20 December 2009 (date seen).

"Freedom of the pressin Russia.", 10 December 2009.

"Iran.", 20 December 2009.

"List of self-declared socialist countries.", 18 December 2009.

"Mao Zedong.", 21 December 2009.

"Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.", 22 June 2008.

"Normandy landings.", 19 December 2009.

"Pharmaceutical industry.", 16 December 2009.

"The press in Russia."  BBC News, 16 May 2008, 16:15 GMT 17:15 UK.  (

"Russia.", 20 December 2009.

"Uyghur people.", 20 December 2009.

"Venezuela.", 6 December 2009.

"Welfare state.", 16 December 2009.

"World: Europe UN predicts serious food shortages in Russia." BBC News, 11 November 1998, 02:46 GMT.  (

"Zimbabwe.", 19 December 2009.

Allen, Kevin.  "Indiana House Democrats leave state.", 23 February 2011, 6:59 a.m

Baker, Peter.  "IN Russian Media, Free Speech for a Select Few." The Washington Post, 25 February 2005, p. A18.  (

Branigan, Tania.  "UN fears tragedy over North Korean food shortage." The Guardian (the United Kingdom), 17 April 2008.  (

Buckley, Sarah.  "North Korea's problem with food."  BBC News, 23 September 2005, 06:52 GMT  07:52 UK.  (

Davies, Tom (The Associated Press).  "Dems leave Indiana House, stalling GOP labor bills."  Yahoo! News, 22 February 2011, 6:00 p.m. ET.

Flynn, Mike.  "Obama's Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis.", 6 November 2008.  (

French, Howard.  "Chinese protesters report a massacre." The New York Times, 9 December 2005.  (

McArthur, William.  "Prescription Drug Costs: Has Canada Found the Answer?"  National Center for Policy Analysis, No. 323, 19 May 2000.  (

Mooney, Kevin, and Barbara Hollingsworth.  "ACORN's 'Muscle for Money' does the bidding of SEIU."  San Francisco Examiner, 7 July 2009.  (

Sanchez, Fabiola.  "Chavez threatens to take over more Venezuela banks."  Newser, 2 December 2009, 3:29 p.m. CST.  (

Whitmore, Brian.  "Russian Free-Press Advocate Moves to Georgia." Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 13 November 2009.  (

Zissis, Carin, and Preeti Bhattacharji.  "Media Censorship in China." Council on Foreign Relations, 18 March 2008.  (

Note: On December 21, 2009, I saw a chart listed as "Communist Democide 1900-1987," which listed statistics about deaths caused by communistic governments or or quasi-government entities, and the Web site was, and the table was associated with an article entitled "HOW MANY DID COMMUNIST REGIMES MURDER?," which was put together by R.J.. Rummel, and the main Web site related to the article was, and the article was an unpublished essay that was dated November 1993.

Note: On December 21, 2009, I went to the Web site for MedPAC, and I looked at, for instance, the Web page identified as

Note: On February 23, 2011, I saw the video under the heading "Dem Congressman To Unions: Time To Get A Little Bloody" at the Web site for The Right Scoop ( with U.S. House of Representative Michael Capuano (a Democrat related to Massachusetts).


    Note: This document was originally posted on the Internet on December 22, 2009.

    Note: This document is known on the Internet as

For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Enemies of the
    United States of America: Politicians
    Who Have Hurt You and Your Family
    by Voting "Yes" on Bad Federal Bills,
    which can be reached by using this
    link: Enemies.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-
    Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and
    Barack Obama, which can be reached
    by using this link: Sharia.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Conservatism for
    Children and What Conservatism Means,
    which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Madness in a President
    and Other Matters of a Defective Mind,
    which can be reached by using this link:
For further reading, you should see my
    document entitled Nonsense Statements
    and Quotations of Barack Obama, which
    can  be reached by using this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled A Little History of
    Barack Obama Events: A Show of
    Deconstruction, which can be reached by
    using this link: History.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Lessons for Children
    about Politics and Dangerous People,
    which can be reached by using this
    link: Children.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled The Next Elections:
    What Has to be Done to Protect the
    United States of America, which can
    be reached by using this link: Elections.
For further reading, you  should see the
    document entitled Rules of a Radical
    Destroyer: The Barack Obama Case,
    which can be reached by using this
    link: Radical.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled World Tyranny:
    Warnings about  the Insane Who are
    Trying to Create a Communist World
    Country, which can be reached by
    using this link: World.
For further reading, you should see my
    document entitled A Necessary Mission
    for Your Life and Freedom: Take on
    the Enemies in the Media, which can be
    reached by using this link: Mission.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Never Forget These
    Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the
    Individual in the United States of
    America, which can be reached by
    using this link: Media.
For further reading, you should see my
    document entitled Political Lessons
    for the Individual Woman and the
    Individual Man in the United States
    of America, which can be reached by
    using this link: Lessons.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled A Fallacy of
    Communism and Marxism: All Things
    Being Equal, which can be reached by
    using this link: Fallacy.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled A Collection of
    Words--Just Words--That Show
    Dangerous People, which can be
    reached by using this link: Words.
For further reading, you should see the
    document entitled Never Forget These
    Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the
    Individual in the United States of
    America, which can be reached by
    using this link: Media.

Note: Many other documents exist at the
Web site for The Hologlobe Press that will
give you information about the bad that Barack
Obama and his associates are doing to the
United States of America, such as the Michigan
Travel Tips documents and the T.H.A.T.
documents that have been published since
the fall of 2008.

To get to the Site-Summary Page for The
    Site-Summary Page for The Hologlobe
    Press, you may use this link: Summary.
To get to the main page for The Hologlobe
    Press, you may click on this link now: