U.S. Senator Willard Mitt Romney --
Yet Another Socialist and Society Killer
Whose Defective Thinking Spread Rottenness
about the Impeachment Trial of
U.S. President Donald J. Trump to Millions
Victor Edward Swanson,
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
copyright c. 2020
(February 10, 2020)
In 2013, I first posted a document on the Internet that was entitled Mitt Romney -- Another Bad Choice for the U.S. Presidency, which can be reached at this Romney link, and since then, Mitt Romney has shown more reasons why Mitt Romney should never be elected to a high-level political office, and I say that it was on February 5, 2020, when Mitt Romney (as a U.S. Senator) proved once and for all why Mitt Romney should never have been elected to a high-lovel political office and should never be elected again to a high-level political office. The focus of this document is on a speech given by U.S. Senator Mitt Romney (the informal name that he uses for himself) in the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, February, 5, 2020, when U.S. Senator Mitt Romney talked about why he was going to cast a vote--one of two--against U.S. President Donald J. Trump, a vote that was designed to define U.S. President Donald J. Trump as guilty in the impeachment trial of U.S. President Donald J. Trump. The speech showed off the low-level thinking skills of U.S. Senator Mitt Romney--such as in relation to logic--and showed off more of his nature as a supporter communism and socialism; it must be noted, for example, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney, while he had been the governor of Massachusetts, had helped pass a communistic health-care bill into law in Massachusetts in 2006 [Note: In addition, smart and good persons had seen how Mitt Romney, while Mitt Rommey had been running against Barack Hussein Obama (a "Democrat") to be the U.S. president, seemed to throw the race or "take dive" during debates (little willing to attack the rotten policies and ideas of Barack Hussein Obama (who was clearly a big supporter of communism and socialism, as he is today).]. It was during the day of February 5, 2020, when U.S. Senator Mitt Romney did his explaining about his upcoming voting (which would be in the four o'clock hour of the afternoon), and the speech came off a fluff and illogical [Note: The speech showed why he should never have been elected to any high-level political office, and the speech gave more proof why politicians should be limited (by law) in what they can do, which is the idea of "limited government," which is the main theme of my document entitled LIMITED GOVERNMENT -- For Good Individuals of a Society to Live Free from Enslavism, Politicians Must be Limited in What They Can Do, and There are No Exceptions to the Rule, which can be reached by using this Limited link, and I report that, for instance, the section of the document covering "The Rule of Generations and Careers" fits U.S. Senator Mitt Romney well.]. Basically, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney began his speech with--"...The Constitution is at the foundation of our Republic's success....". It was noted that The Constitution has the vehicle for impeachment. Much of the time of the speech presented thoughts about U.S. Senator Mitt Romney's religious believes, such as through his saying--"...As a senator juror, I swore an oath before God to exercise impartial justice...." and "...My faith is at the heart of who I am...." and "...But my promise before God to apply impartial justice required that I put my personal feelings and political biases aside....". I report that the religious theme seemed to be used to cover up ulterior motives (such as to support socialism, communism, and the Democrats) and an unsound thinking process to get to a voting decision, and I say that, really, the religious theme had no purpose in the discussion, since the case before U.S. Senator Mitt Romney should only have involved facts and logic related to the case at hand. U.S. Senator Mitt Romney passed along a lot of fluff and useless things, such as about the U.S. Senators, shown when he said such things as--"..We have labored to faithfully execute our responsibilities to it [The Constitution]...." and "...But I hope we respect each other's good faith...." and "...Like each member of this deliberative body, I love our country...." and "....As it is with each senator, my vote is an act of conviction. We've come to different conclusions fellow senators. But I trust we have all followed the dictates of our conscious....". The thoughts are useless and defective, given proof and history show a number of the U.S. senators at the time were communists and socialists, who were and are anti-U.S. Constitution. By the way, Barack Hussein Obama (a Democrat) once said, going into the job as the U.S. president, that we are only a short time away from "fundamentally" changing this country, and when a person wants to "fundamentally" change the country, the person does not want the country set up as it is under The U.S. Constitution and does not "love: the country. U.S. Senator Mitt Romney lied about what the defense team had done to knock down the arguments to remove U.S. President Donald J. Trump from office--"...In addition, the President's team presented three defenses. First, that there could be no impeachment without a statutory crime. Second, the Biden's con, conduct justified the President's actions. And third, that the judgment of the President's actions should be left up to the voters....". These reasons were not--as a group--the main reasons to not remove U.S. President Donald J. Trump from office, and that shows that either U.S. Senator Mitt Romney had been unable to understand what the defense had presented in the U.S. Senate or he was then purposely lying about what had been presented by the defense team, avoiding saying what really had been presented (unable to come up with a way to knock it down) [Note: A good discussion about what the defense team presented during the impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate can be found in, for one, my document entitled A Review of What Television Controlled by Socialists and Communists Worked to Sell as Truth in Relation to the U.S. President Donald J. Trump Impeachment, which can be reached through this Review of Impeachment link.]. While talking about the Bidens reason, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney clearly worked to make what the Biden's seemed to have done (such as related to firing a prosecutor in Ukraine during the time that Barack Hussein Obama was the U.S. president) as nothing big and certainly nothing serious, calling Hunter Biden's actions of being on the board of a company in Ukraine--"unsavory" but "no crime". The highest nonsense from U.S. Senator Mitt Romney was this statement--"...The President's insistence that they be investigated by the Ukrainians is hard to explain, other than a political pursuit. There's no question in my mind that, were their names not Biden, the President would never have done what he did....". The statement about the Bidens and U.S. President Donald J. Trump is incredibly defective. Where is the proof in history that U.S. President Donald J. Trump had been, for instance, running an attack campaign against the Biden family for years or decades or had a feud going on with the Bidens for years? What proof is there that, maybe, there was a decades-long feud between the Trump family and the Biden family, which might be thought of like the now-famous Hatfield-and-McCoy feud of the late 1800s. U.S. Senator Mitt Romney was suggesting that U.S. President Donald J. Trump has been purposely working against the Biden family--and only the Biden family--for decades. Where is the proof that U.S. President Donald J. Trump would not want an investigation done on anyone else? In addition, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney was sort of working to make you believe--I guess--that he could predict the future or prove the future, and that is idiocy--that is, that U.S. President Donald J. Trump would never take up action against someone else. U.S. Senator Mitt Romney passed along shit! Around the time of the telephone called of July 25, 2019, between President Zelensky of Ukraine and U.S. President Trump, a whole bunch of people in the Democratic Party were working to be the next U.S. president, and, then, no one had any idea who would be the real competition for U.S. President Donald J. Trump, and Joseph Biden was yet no real competitor for U.S. Donald J. Trump, and, at that time, the election was a year and a half out (not coming till November 2020) [Note: In February 2020, Joseph Biden was in no way near the top of the list of candidates who were trying to be the nominee for U.S. president by the Democratic Party, and, in fact, his rating was falling and not rising.]. In relation to the idea from the Democrats (such as the "managers" of the U.S. House of Representatives, who presented the case for removal from office to the U.S. senators) about the working being done to corrupt of the election of November 2020, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney said---"...The great question that Constitution tasks senators to answer is whether the President committed an act so extreme and egregious that it rises to a level of a high crime or misdemeanor. Yes, he did. The President asked a foreign government to investigate his political rival...." and "...The President's purpose was personal and political. Accordingly, the President is guilty of an appalling abuse of public trust...." and "...Corrupting an election to keep one's self in office is perhaps the most abusive and destructive violation of one's oath of office as I can imagine...." U.S. Senator Mitt Romney's idea is defective and rotten! I state that there was and is no proof of corrupting an election! By the way, the Democrats spent several years pushing out the idea that U.S. President Donald J. Trump had corrupted the election of 2016 in conjunction with the Russians, and that idea was proven wrong (such as through the "Mueller" investigation), and, anyway, the only so-called corruption by the Russians in relation to the 2016 election was in the form of a bit of advertising on, for example, "facebook"--no votes were corrupted or changed by the Russians. Now try this! Pretend an investigation by the Ukrainians of Joseph Biden and Hunter Biden were to be done. The result could only end up showing that the Bidens did something wrong or bad or did not do something wrong or bad, and it must be remembered there was a treaty of sorts between the United States of America and the Ukraine in which there would be co-operation between the two countries in relation to criminal investigations. If the investigation showed that the Bidens had done nothing wrong or bad, then the Bidens would look good to the American public, and that would not help U.S. President Donald J. Trump, and if the investigation showed that the Bidens had done something wrong or bad, then the American public would better know the nature of Joseph Biden, and that would be good for the country because--maybe--the American public would not vote a rotten man into the office of the U.S. presidency about year and a half later. By the way, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney presented his speech in the same way as the "managers" had before the U.S. public, making wild statements and using a lot of adjectives, and in the end, it was an over-the-top presentation, a portion of which was the idea that "What the President did was wrong, grievously wrong...." [Note: The transcript of the telephone call of July 25, 2019, showed publicly that nothing "grievously wrong" was done.] U.S. Senator Mitt Romney did not refute any points that had been made by the prosecuting team during the impeachment trial, and to close his time before the U.S. Senate on February 5, 2020, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney said--"...I yield the floor.". At that point, a good and smart person understood that nothing had been said about how the so-called "Trump Dossier" was a fake document created by Hillary Clinton to affect the 2016 election, about how FISA warrants had been issued during the 2016 campaign season through false reasons (designed to put down Donald J. Trump), about how people had been working to impeach U.S. President Donald J. Trump from the day that he took office (though he had barely been in office and had not done anything), about how the impeachment process had been started in an illegal manner in the U.S. House of Representatives, et cetera. In the end, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney, taught idiocy about how to think and analyze the world and what is going on and what could go on; for instance, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney did not teach how allowing any committee in the U.S. House of Representatives to request or subpoena documents at will from a U.S. president in relation to a non-official impeachment process (that which has not been sanctioned to take place through a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives) is a bad idea and would make, in essence, the U.S. President a puppet of the U.S. House of Representatives, where so-called impeachment inquiries could be running daily--ever time the U.S. president did not sign bills into law as wanted by the U.S. House of Representatives (which might be called "obstruction of Congress"). Mitt Romney showed American public once again that he is actually an enemy of good people and the United States of America (under The U.S. Constitution). [Note: I could conduct a long class at a university that would easily show up more of the idiocy of Mitt Romney's speech, and if I did, I would want Mitt Romney in the front row of the class so that I could beat up on him verbal and orally.]
Note: This document is known on the Internet as www.hologlobepress.com/romney2.htm.
Note: The first version of this document was posted on the Internet on February 10, 2020.
Note: This document is actually one portion of a longer document, which is called Idiot Thought: A Collection of Nonsense Comments and Ideas from Democrats (such as Communists and Supporters of Sharia) and Others (such as Republicans Who Are Actually "Rhinos" (Fake Republicans) or Are Not "Conservatives"), which can be reached through this Idiot link.
Note: You are urged to see my document entitled A Review of What Television Controlled by Socialists and Communists Worked to Sell as Truth in Relation to the U.S. President Donald J. Trump Impeachment, which can be reached through this Impeachment Trial link.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations
of Barack Obama, which can be reached by
using this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled Conservatism and The United States
Constitution versus Enslavers and Enslavism
(or Communism, Sharia, Socialism, et cetera),
click on this link: Enslavism.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled Conservatism for Children and What
Conservatism Means, which can be reached by
using this link: Conservatism.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled Enslavism--The Definition and
Explanation, which can be reached by using
this link: Enslavism Defined.
Note: And there are many related documents to these
four listed right above at the website for The
Hologlobe Press, and to see a list of documents,
use this link to the Site-Summary Page for The
Hologlobe Press: Summary.