A COVID-19 Document that
Shows the Rottenness of the CDC, Many in the
Medical Community, Many in the Media, and
All the Democrats, such as Gretchen Whitmer,
Andrew Cuomo, and Joseph Biden,
Victor Edward Swanson,
(November 10, 2021)
At the moment, it looks as if, in around November 2019, COVID-19 or the coronavirus ended up in public areas of China, and it looks as if the virus escaped from at least one lab in China and not from a "wet market" in China (as has been pushed by communists and socialists and liberals and progressives in at least the United States of America, who have been working to downplay the role of Chinese communists in experimenting with such a virus and whatever), and it looks as if U.S. government money (tied to a government unit headed by Dr. Andrew Fauci) was used to fund virus-related work in China [Note: I do have to note that the virus may have been purposely introduced into public areas of China so that government officials might learn what the virus could do in the field, but that is only speculation, but I have to make speculation since communists lie and communists are willing to kill their own people, as history shows). From about November 2019 to late January 2020, the Chinese (the rulers of the Chinese communist government) kept quiet about the virus and its deadliness before the world, and during the period, the virus spread to other parts of the world, such as the United States of America, and in late January 2020, U.S. President Donald J. Trump began to put rules in place to block travel between the United States of America and other countries--those with people infected with the coronavirus (as it was mostly called then) [Note: In the weeks and months following January 2020, Democrats would push the lie that U.S. President Donald Trump did nothing to protect citizens of the United States of America from the coronavirus.]. Generally speaking, people have been getting or dealing with the coronavirus or COVID-19 in the United States of America since February 2020, as they have with flu. Since February 2020, the members of the Democratic Party have pushed out lies about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, such as in relation to cures and deaths, and many members of the press have helped push the lies or have been involved in supressing information about treatments for COVID-19 or the coronavirus, and many in the medical community, such as a pharmacies and in hospitals, have been involved in hurting people in the United States of America by not providing possible treatments. And since February 2020, the citizens of the United States of America have been exposed to defective information or conflicting information about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, and, for example, there have been times when government-related people (such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose life has mostly been tied to being a bureaucrat andnot a doctor with patients and is tied to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) have noted that people need not wear masks, should wear masks, might wear two masks at once, should wear masks in the home, should not gather together at holidays without wearing masks, et cetera. I report that, since the coronavirus or COVID-19 hit the United States of America, I have heard a lot of nonsense about coronavirus or COVID-19, and so I have made this document to present information that can knock down those who might push and do push defective or illogical information about coronavirus and COVID-19, and I have put the document together since there seem to be few documents existing (especially one that can be updated regularly, which is unlike what can be done with a book in print) that people can see at any time [Note: Some radio programs, such as nationally syndicated radio programs, present useful news about COVID-19 or the coronavirus from day to day or whatever, but the operators of those programs never put together a document that gets updated and contains, for example, a chronological presentation of highlight news, making logical points.]. Here is a document that fills a big purpose.
I begin with a highlights section, the core of which began to be exist a little while ago in Television History and Trivia documents that I put on the Internet at the website for The Hologlobe Press, and the last document that had the core was Television History and Trivia #210. The material shows how people have worked to downplay rottenness of various people or entities in relation to COVID-19 or the coronavirus, such as treatment, or how people have worked to put out lies about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, as Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer did in early 2020, and I do more with the section. This is a section that can be updated.
On April 13, 2020, Michigan State Representative Karen Whitmett showed up at the White House in Washington, D.C., and she was there to thank U.S. President Donald J. Trump because he had publicly talked about using hydroxychloroquine to fight against the coronavirus, and she had already thanked U.S. President Donald J. Trump in public statements. Karen Whitmett was a Democrat, and Donald Trump was a Republican, and, later, other members of the Democratic Party, such as in Michigan, would, in essence, scold Karen Whitmett for thanking Donald Trump. By the way, in around the spring of 2020, some Democrats were pushing the issue that Donald Trump was promoting hydroxychloroquine because he had money invested in the entity or entities that were making hydroxychloroquine and Donald Trump was more concerned about money for himself or friends than about ill people, and Democratic-type people at least were pushing out the idea that hydroxychloroquine was dangerous, though it had been used in the country or years and was not dangerous [Note: For example, The Washington Post, a communistic news entity, released a story called "Trump's promotion of hydroxychloroquine is almost certainly about politics, not profits" on April 7, 2020, and the subtitle of the story was "At least, not his profits".]. Basically, the Karen Whitmett story is that Karen Whitmett and her husband (both of whom were blacks) caught the coronavirus in March 2020, and their doctor, who had heard about using hydroxychloroquine, gave them hydroxychloroquine (at least), and within days, they were in good shape.
Here is an aside. One, hydroxychloroquine was being used in early 2020 in the treatment of the coronavirus with some type of antibiotic and with zinc, and it may have been used with vitamin D, too, and one story about why using hydroxychloroquine was being touted is because of the work of Dr. Daniel Wallace, a rheumatologist tied to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, who had been using the drug on lupus patients for decades and what they were not contracting in relation to the coronavirus in recent times related to the spread of the coronavirus. Two, there is the old rule that notes you go with what you have and not with what you wish you had, and, for example, that theme can be tied to military action in which soldiers can only fight with what they have or with the best that they have, and Democrats in the spring of 2020 were putting down any use of hydroxychloroquine, though it had shown to have at least some helpfulness, and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer was one person who put down in public speeches the use of hydroxychloroquine, saying that there is no cure for the coronavirus or COVID-19.
In July 2020, I had a short conversation with Dr. Joan Crawford, M.D., at Eastlake Cardiovascular, St. Clair Shores, Michigan. I asked a few questions about what she has been seeing at the hospitals with which she was associated, which were, basically, in the eastern part of the Detroit-Metropolitan area. By the way, I report that Dr. Joan Crawford was not geared to working with patients with the coronavirus or COVID-19, and she was only concerned with patients' heart problems. Dr. Joan Crawford noted, that when she was passing through ER areas, she most often saw black men in beds, and she said that they most often were overweight and had diabetes, and they men were usually older than 40 years of age. The hospitals where Dr. Joan Crawford worked some days of the week were tied to communities that had whites and blacks and others, but it looked as if older black men were more susceptible to getting ill than others were in the early stages of the coronavirus spread.
Since April 2004 , I have posted documents at the website for The Hologlobe Press, and some of those documents are monthly presentations about television in the Detroit area and in the country, and the documents are known as Television History and Trivia documents, and in the spring of 2020, I used several of the documents to show what Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer said in press conferences in relation to the coronavirus event in Michigan, such as the number people with coronavirus and about "lock downs" for the state (such as about not traveling), and, for example, some information about Gretchen Whitmer was put into Television and History and Trivia #192 (which can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #192 link) and Television History of Trivia #193 (which can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #193 link). In the spring of 2020 in several press conferences, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (whom I define as a hard-line socialist of the Democratic Party) really showed off the rottenness of her mind and the minds of her associates, such as Lt. Governor Garlin Gilchrist (a black and a Democrat), and what she and her associated did was work to push the idea that the medical community in Michigan is racist, and Gretchen Whitmer pushed the idea that there are "deep inadequacies" in Michigan in relation to health care, and she pushed the idea that, basically, the medical community in Michigan is racist against blacks. It was on August 5, 2020, when Gretchen Whitmer said in a press conference--"..Today, I also signed an executive directive declaring racism as a public health crisis in Michigan. I want to thank the Michigan Legislative Black Council for their leadership. This pandemic has confirmed and highlighted the deadly nature of these pre-existing inequalities caused by systemic racism....". Yet, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer never touted therapeutics, such as hydroxychloroquine, as possible helpful tools against the coronavirus or COVID-19, and, in addition, Gretchen Whitmer pushed having coronavirus-infected patients put in nursing homes, which were places with people who already had health problems or were old or had weak body systems, and that was something like what New York Governor Andrew Cuomo did, pushing coronavirus-infected people into nursing homes, and his action led to the deaths of many [Note: I will say that the stories about nursing homes and Gretchen Whitmer and about nursing homes and Andrew Cuomo have yet to be completed, such as by honorable people and honorable writers.].
On December 9, 2020, a video entitled "It's a HORRIBLE time in history to be Honest and Ethical. People love the LIE" was posted on YouTube. The video features testimony from Dr. Pierre Kory, who is, for example, related to an entity called the "Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance" and to the St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center. In the video, Dr. Pierre Kory talks about an anti-viral called "ivermectin", which has been around for some time, and talks about using it to defeat COVID-19. The talk was given at a hearing (entitled "Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of the EN SVVID-19 Solution") at the U.S. Senate (related to the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs) on December 8, 2020. See the video!
[Note: In the spring of 2020, especially around April 2020, the Democrats and people in parts of the federal government (such as the FDA), were putting down using hydroxychloroquine, saying it was dangerous, but some doctors did use it, such as on a state representative of Michigan and her husband, who thanked U.S. President Donald J. Trump for making hydroxychloroquine more known. Keep in mind--then--in the spring, hydroxychloroquine was a decades-old drug and was not dangerous (when used properly). By the way, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (a Democrat and a socialist and a feminist (a.k.a. for all of them "enslavist")) was putting down and not promoting the drug while pushing the idea that blacks were dying of COVID-19 because the medical community was racist against blacks, and some Democrats around the country were pushing the idea that U.S. President Donald J. Trump was promoting the drug because he had stock in the company making the drug. "Ivermectin" is a known drug, and medical people know how to use it and handle it. Hold it! On December 14, 2020, the first person in the United States of America, who was in Florida, received a vaccine shot for COVID-19; companies that had developed the drug delayed telling the world that their work was done till right after the election of November 3, 2020. In December 2020, once it looked as if Donald J. Trump was no longer going to be the U.S. president, the people of the American Medical Association were saying that hydroxychloroquine could be used.]
Here is a story about Ivermectin. On December 29, 2020, a woman named Judith Smemthiewicz of Cheektowaga, New York, was taken in an ambulance to Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, New York, because she was ill with COVID-19. She was put in intensive care and in a ventilator. There, A doctor gave her Ivermectin on January 2, 2021--one shot--and she got better, and she was soon moved to another area of the hospital, where she took a turn for the worse, and then a doctor in the other area would not give her Ivermectin. It took a lawsuit to get a judge to order that Ivermectin be given to Judith Smemthiewicz, and she it was given her, she got well.
On June 2, 2021, an entity called Breitbart published an article entitled "ANTHONY FAUCI IGNORED EMAIL FROM PHYSICIST CLAIMING HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE COULD HELP BATTLE CORONVIRUS" (which was written by Jacob Bliss). The article noted that, in March 2020, a man named Erik Nielsen (a physicist) sent information to Dr. Anthony Fauci that suggested ciclesonide (or Alvesco) and hydroxychloroquine seemed to be effective in battling COVID-19. The article passed along the idea that Dr. Anthony Fauci ignored the information from Erik Nielsen, and the article presented the idea that Dr. Anthony Fauci considered the email from Erik Nielsen to be too long to take time to see.
On September 6, 2021, and September 7, 2021, at least some people were learning that the U.S. federal government supplied money to entities in China to work on, in essence, COVID-19-related research, such as "gain-of-function" research. Two of the entities were the Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. A good and smart person in the United States of America has to wonder why the hell was U.S. money going to China, especially in relation to something that could be highly dangerous to man? News reports showed that Dr. Anthony Fauci (who was the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) lied about the funding process, which involved him, and the funding process was tied to, for example, an entity called the EchoHealth Alliance. [Curanaj, Lidia. "Report: Wuhan lab documents show Fauci lied about 'gain of function' research." wabcradio.com, 7 September 2021.; Justice, Tristan. "New Details Of Fauci Funding Chinese Gain-of-Function Research Vindicate Rand Paul." thefederalist.com, 7 September 2021.; Lerner, Sharon, and Mara Hvistendahl. "New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research at Chinese Lab." theintercept.com, 6 September 2021, 9:06 p.m..]
I have sort of a side note here. In September 2021, I was hearing information that noted that some pharmacies, such as those associated with the big chain stores like CVS, are refusing to fill prescriptions for ivermectin, and, for example, that type of information was passed along on the nationally syndicated radio show known as The Charlie Kirk Show (on September 21, 2021). If a doctor prescribes ivermectin for a person (a patient)--whatever the reason--how can a pharmacy refuse to fill the prescription, given it is not the job of a pharmacy to determine what the person should get and should not get (which is done by the doctor in association with the person)? It seems pharmacies could be and should be sued for not filling prescriptions.
In around 2021 (at least), a man named Dennis Prager hosted a nationally syndicated weekday radio show entitled The Dennis Prager Show. For the week of Monday, October 11, 2021, Dennis Prager did not do hosting for at least a few days, and the show was being hosted by substitutes. Then, on Monday, October 18, 2021, Dennis Prager was back on the air, and he was not sounding really well, and Dennis Prager reported that he had gotten a COVID-19 illness. At about 2:45 p.m. (Detroit time) on October 18, 2021, the doctor who was treating Dennis Prager called in to the program, and he passed along some thoughts. The doctor--Dr. Jeff Barke (of California)--believed Dennis Prager would be doing worse in relation to health, if he had not been using ivermectin before getting ill and if he had not gotten "regeneron" treatment. Dr. Jeff Barke had stern words for the medical community, pharmacies, and the federal government. Because entities, such as hospitals are refusing to give COVID-19-ill patients "regeneron" treatment--which has been shown to be highly useful in beating down COVID-19--Dr. Jeff Barke said that it is "criminal" in nature, and he passed along the idea that it is almost as if they (such people in the federal government, especially the people of the Joe Biden administration) want people to die. Dr. Jeff Barke noted that hospitals are often putting down "regeneron" and only pushing "remdesiver," which--as he noted on the air--can cause kidney problems and other health problems. One point that Dr. Jeff Barke said was that the federal government--which now has control over the distribution of regeneron--is purposely making it harder for doctors to get "regeneron" for their patients, and another point that Dr. Jeff Barke made was the Kaiser (a big medical-related entity) has refused to give patients hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Dr. Jeff Barke said--"...We're literally killing people.". Both Dennis Prager and Dr. Jeff Barke reported to the audience that it was hard to get regeneron for Dennis Prager because of the rottenness that is going on, such as in California with pharmacies, a number of which will not follow orders of doctors to give out regeneron.
In around October 21, 2021, a good percentage of the people in the country were vaccinated at least with one dose or shot related to COVID-19, and many people probably had natural immunity, and for the last nearly two years, it had been said that really only about two-percent of the population of the country even had to worry about COVID-19, since only a small percentage of people made up the group of the those who were more prone to serious illness or death from COVID-19 (not unlike what happens with flu, which kills some people each year). On October 21, 2021, Joseph Biden was the center of a "town-hall"-type television broadcast on CNN, and the event was headed by Anderson Cooper (a socialist at least). During the event, Joseph Biden once again pushed the issue that unvaccinated people were the big problem today, and in what people later would say was mocking of people who were anti-vaccination, Joseph Biden said--"...I have the freedom to kill you with my COVID!....". A good and smart person can see that Joseph Biden was actually mocking "freedom" (which is anti-communistic). What type of man--who is supposed to be a U.S. president--would say a statement like that from Joseph Biden? I say that it is a man who would stab you in the face with a knife, if he could get away with it, which is the way of the communist and such.
Here is status report segment, which was added on Sunday, October 24, 2021. At this time, it was not really, really, really proven that the COVID-19 event came from a lab in China, a communist country and an enemy country to the United States of America (under the way it should be under The United States Constitution, which is a document that is not supported by the Democratic Party in the United States of America, which promotes and follows the way of communism, socialism, liberalism, progressivism, and such, which are rotten forms of government). However, during the week of Monday, October 18, 2021, a number of news reports were published on the Internet about the Wuhan virus (COVID-19), the National Institutes of Health (or the NIH), Dr. Anthony Fauci, Lawrence Tabak (of the NIH), Richard Ebright (a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University), and more, and one theme was presented in a letter issued by Richard Ebright that made the point that, indeed, grants from the National Institutes of Health to ultimately Chinese researchers, which had gone through EcoHealth Alliance (an entity in the United States of America that ultimately passed the money over to the Chinese) did involve "gain-of-function" research, which is work to make a virus of some type more deadly to humans. A good and smart person must ask--Why did any money from the United States of America go to an entity--specifically a lab that works on harmful viruses--in China? On October 24, 2021, it was looking as if Dr. Anthony Fauci did lie in the past, such as in federal-government hearings, by saying no government money went to "gain-of-function" research. More on the events of the week of Monday October 19, 2021, can be found in such articles as "NIH letter appears to conflict with Fauci, Collins claims about Wuhan lab" [Schemmel, Alec. "NIH letter appears to conflict with Fauci, Collins claims about Wuhan lab." abcnews4.com, 21 October 2021.], "'Bombshell' NIH letter on bat coronavirus research reveals Fauci's big lie, professor says" [Dunleavy, Jerry (The Washington Examiner). "'Bombshell' NIH letter on bat coronavirus research reveals Fauci's big lie, professor says." yahoo.com, 24 October 2021, 1:45 a.m..], "Remembering Those Journalists Who Helped Cover for Anthony Fauci's 'Gain-of-Function' Misdirection" [Schorr, Isaac (The National Review). "Remembering Those Journalists Who Helped Cover for Anthony Fauci's 'Gain-of-Function' Misdirection." yahoo.com, 21 October 2021, 1:03 p.m..], and "NIH says grantee failed to report experiment in Wuhan that created a bat virus that made mice sicker" [Kaiser, Jocelyn. "NIH says grantee failed to report experiment in Wuhan that created a bat virus that made mice sicker." Science, 21 October 2021, 4:15 p.m..]. It is a fact that U.S. money went to China for virus research, and that is rotten, and it shows what rottenness exists in the government of the United States of America--in the form of people, especially those tied to the Democratic Party.
For about 25 years, Sean Hannity was been a nationally known radio-show host and television-show host, and in around September 23, 2021, he was hosting his nationally syndicated radio program for weekdays called The Sean Hannity Show, and on September 23, 2021, Sean Hannity had a man named Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., as a guest, and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. had been involved with, for example, mRNA research (which is related to vaccines) and was a nationally known immunologist. During one hour of The Sean Hannity Show, Sean Hannity and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., passed along thoughts about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, such as about the vaccines and treatments, and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., made the point that the elderly and the obese are the most at risk from the virus. The next day--at least--some communistic news entities worked to put down Dr. Robert Malone, M.D.; for example, Media Matters (a communist news entity) pushed out the article entitled "Hannity continues radio campaign to undermine COVID-19 vaccines, hosts guest who claims unvaccinated Americans are at risk from the vaccinated" [Karet, Brendan. "Hannity continues radio campaign to undermine COVID-19 vaccines, hosts guest who claims unvaccinated Americans are at risk from the vaccinated." mediamatters.org, 24 September 2021, 5:11 pm. EDT.]. Despite the criticism against Sean Hannity and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., the interview was run again (as a repeat) on October 11, 2021, and this section of the document presents much of the material of the interview (at least most of comments made by Dr. Robert Malone, M.D.).
I start off with material from Dr. Robert Malone. He said--"....Actually, you got something a little bit wrong. Ah, the J&J vaccine--and I've heard this before--the J&J vaccine is not a traditional vaccine technology. Okay? All three of those are, basically, gene-therapy technologies applied to vaccines. The J&J technology has never been rolled out at this level. In fact, it stems from the same laboratory at the same time that I was in when I had the mRNA discoveries, that being the lab in...at the Salk Institute of Molecular Biology and Virology Lab. So I'm very familiar with both...." I note, in late 2020, it was announced that supposed effective vaccines were developed or nearly developed, and the three company-types that soon arrived were from--Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Moderna. During the interview, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. noted that, in essence, a gene of the COVID-19 is put to a cold-like virus, which is then grown, and the resulting thing is put in to people, and, basically, a person's cells are the manufacturing entity for "the final vaccine product", and he noted that that is different from a traditional vaccine, such as one related to flu, in which a purified fragment of a virus is put in a medium, such as egg material, and mixed with things to make it more reactive, and the resulting product is injected. These current vaccines related to COVID-19 are more like "attenuated vaccines" (like polio vaccines).
Now, I present four main pieces of thought in text form that came from Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., in the interview.:
So, uhm, let's start with efficacy. So, there's, uhm, the language you'll hear is efficacy and effectiveness. Efficacy is something that's measured in a clinical trial, which often will overepresent how good something is, uhm, because of the, the controlled nature of doing a clinical trail. Effectiveness is how good does it work in the field, in the real world. Okay? So those are two key words. And the efficacy that you're talking about from these relatively modest, very brief initial clinical trials that they rushed, uhm, was efficacy. You're, you're citing the, the numbers for death and disease, protection against death and disease. That's different from protection against infection or replication or spread. Okay? So it turns out that even back in the day, uhm, when we were dealing with the original strains that are the ones that are matched to these vaccines, 'cause now we got different viruses basically that aren't matched to these current vaccines. Uhm, but back on the day, what they didn't disclose, you know, wasn't in the press, and you're no stranger to the, the, ah, let's say, legacy media, uhm, ah, just basically regurgitating whatever pablum the government gives them and the pharmaceutical companies give them. So that's what he had. They just kind of regurgitated it to us. They didn't ask questions. But, in fact, the ability of the vaccines to block infection was not anywhere near ninety percent. Now, what we have is, uhm, evolved strains. So this is, you know, fundamental Darwinian evolution kind of stuff, where you have selective pressure imposed by the vaccines. And no surprise, because you only have a single antigen, a single protein from the virus that's being produced in the vaccinated, uhm, no surprise that the virus is evolving to escape that, ah, immune pressure caused by those vaccines. Now, there's another wrinkle to this in that, uhm, generally we use vaccines before we have a pandemic. Right? That's how we need to try to get them out. And that's a different situation. Vaccinating into an ongoing pandemic when there's a whole lot of virus circulating is a whole different kettle of fish. And what happens then is you really do have a setup for development of these escape mutes, which is what you're seeing. The virus is evolving to escape the vaccines, and it will continue to do so, particularly if we have a universal vaccination policy. And what, what we're at risk for with this universal policy is we're gonna to continue to generate escape mutants, and they will converge on escape mutants that--and this is happening, we can see it, and if you follow the genetics, it's kind of complex stuff but it's for sure happening--it will drive toward some common variant that's really good a replicating and escaping the vaccine. And then what happens, oh, the people that really needed the vaccine the most--the elderly, the obese, the immuno-suppressed--they're no longer going to have first-line protection. They're going to be back where they were before, only with viruses that are even more highly replication competent, because that's the other thing that's happened is these new variants replicate at much higher levels, whether you're vaccinated or not. So if you get infected, if you're vaccinated, here's the paradox. That's it's just--a lot of people are waking up to this. Okay? That there's all this talk that it's the unvaccinated that are creating risk for the vaccinated. Now, that just doesn't make sense when you think it through, if these vaccines are worth a grain of salt.
Precisely. Yeah. Right. Okay. So how, how does it make any sense at all that the unvaccinated are the ones that are the problem? In fact, what's happening is that the vaccinated are, when they are infected, and these--we now know with these new strains that they're--the protection against infection is something like forty to sixty percent. Okay? So it's really not that great. And if you do get infected, your chance of having severe disease is lower. Well, that sounds good. Right? That's a good thing.
Here's, here's, here's the wrinkle in that. Okay. Is that what that means is the folks that are vaccinated are still getting infected. They're replicating virus in their bodies at the same or higher levels than they were before. They're shedding virus at the same or higher levels than they were before. Remember, at the beginning of the outbreak when we talked about super spreaders? We've created a whole huge bunch of super spreaders. So the truth is it's the unvaccinated that are at risk from the vaccinated. Does that make sense?
Yes, it's true. But the difference is that now we have folks walking around who think they're perfectly health, but in fact are making a lot of virus, and we have a lot of those people doing that. So, that's the difference. You look at it sideways, different from what you're being told. You know, you know, it should be that the vaccinated are protected, they're not at risk from the unvaccinated. That should be the way it is.
In the interview, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., said about the viruses--"...I think they've been rushed. I think that's pretty clear. Two key things--we needed more information about the adverse events--the risk of the vaccine--and the other was that, uhm, the database structure that the CDC had used to capture these adverse events was broken. It wasn't working. That was really controversial at the time, but both things have now been proven true. So in terms in my point of view, uhm, these were rushed...." and "...Based on the current data, it makes sense to vaccinate people sixty-five and older, morbidly obese, and people with immune deficiencies...." and "...We should go ahead and make available the variety of drugs largely anti-inflamatories--not perfect--but, uhm, that are being used by physicians all over the world to keep people out of the hospital, keep them from dying, and keep them from developing...." [Note: Sean Hannity stepped on or talked over Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., for the last material that I presented, not allowing me to understand the remainder of the sentence.]. Dr. Robert Malone also noted that steroids are a solution, and he urged people to make sure that their vitamin D levels are not low, and based on data, he noted that good levels of vitamin D in a person can help the person fight off COVID-19. Later, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., said--"...The, ah, current vaccine products--and there's new one coming that are second-generation products--but the current vaccine products all rely on the spike protein, and the spike protein was the focus because it was known that, uhm, ah, that protein would provide pretty good protection, and so it was a safe bet....". But in relation to the previous sentence, it was said that the spike-protein theme only results in small blocking potential overall or a small neutralizing range. Since the variants are not directly target by the vaccine, Dr. Robert Malone noted that "We're vaccinating for yesterday's virus.". One of the final main thoughts from Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., which applied to more doses of a vaccine for a person--"...Many vaccinologists, myself included, think that overvaccinating for flu is, is actually not a good thing. One of the things that's kind of, ah, a little bit worrisome about this, ah, we're just gonna ahead and give everybody a jab every six months strategy is there's a thing called high-zone tolerance and another thing called original antigenic sin. So those are fancy immunology words. But what they equate to is that more is not always better with vaccines. More vaccination or frequent vaccination can in some cases actually make it so that you're less able to amount an immune response....".
So Joseph Biden as the U.S. president has pushed out the idea that the unvaccinated are the people who are the problem, killing people, but I find that, for example, the government has done more to kill people than the unvaccinated, since government people have put down therapeutics, such as hydroxychloroquine, and put COVID-19-infected people in nursing homes, which led to the death of thousands, and it seems government people have lied about things or not passed along good information about things. Today, I have yet to learn if certain types of people in the world are more resistant to being hurt by COVID-19-related viruses than other are. For example, it seems very likely that people who have sickle-cell anemia, such as those with African heritage, are people who could have big health problems if they have COVID-19 illness. Do people with heritage that includes various European plagues have a better time surviving a COVID-19-type attack? Remember--History shows that some people get HIV (a virus) and never develop the deadly AIDS (which was a big concern around the world in the 1980s). A database about types of people would be helpful, since it would show what types of people have to be watched over more carefully and be more cautious about where they go and such. Does the idea of having children wear masks all the time have something to do with hurting children in the long run? When children are young, they are usually healthy, and they can be more healthy than the elderly can be, and if children are wearing masks all the time, they become less exposed to all the types of diseases and viruses and germs that are out in the world, and they become less developed or strong at fighting diseases and viruses and germs later in life. Childrens' wearing masks all the time makes it harder for childrens' immune systems to become strong and to become able to take on more things, especially later in life. Why has government, such as the Joseph Biden administration and the Gretchen Whitmer administration, been so bent on putting down ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, when both drugs have been used safely for many years, if done by someone skilled at using such drugs (such as real doctors)? Repurposing of drugs does happen. By the way, in August 2021, someone at the Federal Drug Administration (or the FDA) of the federal government put out this Tweet in relation to using ivermectin (which came off as childish)--"...You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.". History shows that the federal government--at least under the control of Joseph Biden as the U.S. president--has worked to limit the supply of monoclonal antibodies (used to fight COVID-19) to some states, such as Florida, which happened in late 2021 [Note: On October 14, 2021, while writing the main body of this document, I heard a guest on The Sean Hannity Show report that he has had a very hard time getting monoclonal antibody material for the last month and a half.]. Why would the Joseph Biden and other Democrats want to limit the supply of what can help people? The answer can be shown in other actions by such people, which show their disregard for non-communists, non-socialists, non-progressives, non-liberals, and such. For example, Joseph Biden killed the Keystone Pipeline, which was giving people jobs, and the Joseph Biden adminstration has let the border between Mexico and the United States of America disappear, except on paper (it seems for now). Evidence shows that Democrats in government positions, such that of the U.S. president, are working to damage the country, and cutting back on what can keep people healthy is a way in which to damage the good people of the country, and that is the way of, for instance, communists and those who wish to turn a place from one form of government that is not based on enslavism to a country based on enslavism, like communism.
[Note: Any country that has a health-care system completely controlled by the government is a rotten country, because the government can deny health care to whomever it wants, and, clearly, the Democratic Party, which supports communism, wants the country to have a health-care system, such as a "universal health-care system," that is completely controlled by the government, and that is the nature of evil.]
On November 8, 2021, I listened to The Mark Levin Show (a nationally distributed radio show), which is hosted by Mark R. Levin. In the third hour of the show, Mark R. Levin interviewed Peter Navarro, who had had a book released to the public on November 2, 2021, and the book was called In Trump Time: My Journal of America's Plague Year. Peter Navarro worked in the U.S. President Donald J. Trump administration, and he worked closely with U.S. President Donald J. Trump. Mark R. Levin and Peter Navarro only had a short amount of time to talk about the book, given the interview was done on radio. For one, Peter Navarro, whose book was based on, for example, a journal that he had related to the U.S. President Donald J. Trump time, noted how the vaccine for COVID-19 was purposely delayed by people in the federal government who were working against U.S. President Donald J. Trump and by a vaccine maker, and that was in late 2019, and Peter Navarro noted that the actions surely led to the deaths of people, and Peter Navarro reported that his book shows that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a rotten man and should be put in prison, such as for omitting information to the public about COVID-19.
I have to note that little push was made in the United States of America by the medical community and the government to make therapeutics highly important in the fight against COVID-19--the push was mostly about vaccines--and the American media, especially the so-called main media, did not push the issue about using therapeutics in a bigger way.
Buckley, Eileen. "Judge orders hospital to treat COVID patient with experimental drug." wkbw.com, 18 January 2021, 6:27 p.m..
Bump, Philip. "Trump's promotion of hydroxychloroquine is almost certainly about politics, not profits." washingtonpost.com, 7 April 2020.
Herbeck, Dan. "After judge orders hospital to use experimental Covid-19 treatment, woman recovers." buffalonews.com, 15 January 2021 (updated 17 August 2021).
Lavender, Paige. "FDA Warns Against Using Livestock Drug to Treat COVID-19." huffpost.com, 21 August 2021, 04:19 EDT.
Moye, Dave. "Joe Rogan Has COVID-19, Says He Took Ivermectin To Treat It." huffpost.com, 1 September 2021, 07:21 p.m. EDT (updated 2 September 2021).
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
The United States of America
Note: For further reading, see my document entitled A COVID-19/Coronavirus Story or The Communists and Socialists Once Again Did Their Thing--Kill People, which can be reached through this Virus link.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure:
The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be
reached at this link: Health.
To see information about the impeachment trial
of U.S. President Donald J. Trump, which shows
why Democrats have the minds of killers, click
on: Impeachment Trial.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled Never Forget These Media Darlings ? --
A Guide for the Individual in the United
States of America, which can reached by
using this link: Media.
To go to the main page of The Hologlobe Press,
click on: www.hologlobepress.com.