A COVID-19 Document that
Shows the Rottenness of the CDC, Many in the
Medical Community, Many in the Media, and
All the Democrats, such as Gretchen Whitmer,
Andrew Cuomo, and Joseph Biden,
Victor Edward Swanson,
(February 1, 2022)
At the moment, it looks as if, in around November 2019, COVID-19 or the coronavirus ended up in public areas of China, and it looks as if the virus escaped from at least one lab in China and not from a "wet market" in China (as has been pushed by communists and socialists and liberals and progressives in at least the United States of America, who have been working to downplay the role of Chinese communists in experimenting with such a virus and whatever), and it looks as if U.S. government money (tied to a government unit headed by Dr. Andrew Fauci) was used to fund virus-related work in China [Note: I do have to note that the virus may have been purposely introduced into public areas of China so that government officials might learn what the virus could do in the field, but that is only speculation, but I have to make speculation since communists lie and communists are willing to kill their own people, as history shows). From about November 2019 to late January 2020, the Chinese (the rulers of the Chinese communist government) kept quiet about the virus and its deadliness before the world, and during the period, the virus spread to other parts of the world, such as the United States of America, and in late January 2020, U.S. President Donald J. Trump began to put rules in place to block travel between the United States of America and other countries--those with people infected with the coronavirus (as it was mostly called then) [Note: In the weeks and months following January 2020, Democrats would push the lie that U.S. President Donald Trump did nothing to protect citizens of the United States of America from the coronavirus.]. Generally speaking, people have been getting or dealing with the coronavirus or COVID-19 in the United States of America since February 2020, as they have with flu. Since February 2020, the members of the Democratic Party have pushed out lies about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, such as in relation to cures and deaths, and many members of the press have helped push the lies or have been involved in supressing information about treatments for COVID-19 or the coronavirus, and many in the medical community, such as a pharmacies and in hospitals, have been involved in hurting people in the United States of America by not providing possible treatments. And since February 2020, the citizens of the United States of America have been exposed to defective information or conflicting information about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, and, for example, there have been times when government-related people (such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose life has mostly been tied to being a bureaucrat and not a doctor with patients and is tied to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) have noted that people need not wear masks, should wear masks, might wear two masks at once, should wear masks in the home, should not gather together at holidays without wearing masks, et cetera. I report that, since the coronavirus or COVID-19 hit the United States of America, I have heard a lot of nonsense about coronavirus or COVID-19, and so I have made this document to present information that can knock down those who might push and do push defective or illogical information about coronavirus and COVID-19, and I have put the document together since there seem to be few documents existing (especially one that can be updated regularly, which is unlike what can be done with a book in print) that people can see at any time [Note: Some radio programs, such as nationally syndicated radio programs, present useful news about COVID-19 or the coronavirus from day to day or whatever, but the operators of those programs never put together a document that gets updated and contains, for example, a chronological presentation of highlight news, making logical points.]. Here is a document that fills a big purpose.
I begin with a highlights section, the core of which began to be exist a little while ago in Television History and Trivia documents that I put on the Internet at the website for The Hologlobe Press, and the last document that had the core was Television History and Trivia #210. The material shows how people have worked to downplay rottenness of various people or entities in relation to COVID-19 or the coronavirus, such as treatment, or how people have worked to put out lies about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, as Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer did in early 2020, and I do more with the section. This is a section that can be updated.
On April 13, 2020, Michigan State Representative Karen Whitmett showed up at the White House in Washington, D.C., and she was there to thank U.S. President Donald J. Trump because he had publicly talked about using hydroxychloroquine to fight against the coronavirus, and she had already thanked U.S. President Donald J. Trump in public statements. Karen Whitmett was a Democrat, and Donald Trump was a Republican, and, later, other members of the Democratic Party, such as in Michigan, would, in essence, scold Karen Whitmett for thanking Donald Trump. By the way, in around the spring of 2020, some Democrats were pushing the issue that Donald Trump was promoting hydroxychloroquine because he had money invested in the entity or entities that were making hydroxychloroquine and Donald Trump was more concerned about money for himself or friends than about ill people, and Democratic-type people at least were pushing out the idea that hydroxychloroquine was dangerous, though it had been used in the country or years and was not dangerous [Note: For example, The Washington Post, a communistic news entity, released a story called "Trump's promotion of hydroxychloroquine is almost certainly about politics, not profits" on April 7, 2020, and the subtitle of the story was "At least, not his profits".]. Basically, the Karen Whitmett story is that Karen Whitmett and her husband (both of whom were blacks) caught the coronavirus in March 2020, and their doctor, who had heard about using hydroxychloroquine, gave them hydroxychloroquine (at least), and within days, they were in good shape.
Here is an aside. One, hydroxychloroquine was being used in early 2020 in the treatment of the coronavirus with some type of antibiotic and with zinc, and it may have been used with vitamin D, too, and one story about why using hydroxychloroquine was being touted is because of the work of Dr. Daniel Wallace, a rheumatologist tied to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, who had been using the drug on lupus patients for decades and what they were not contracting in relation to the coronavirus in recent times related to the spread of the coronavirus. Two, there is the old rule that notes you go with what you have and not with what you wish you had, and, for example, that theme can be tied to military action in which soldiers can only fight with what they have or with the best that they have, and Democrats in the spring of 2020 were putting down any use of hydroxychloroquine, though it had shown to have at least some helpfulness, and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer was one person who put down in public speeches the use of hydroxychloroquine, saying that there is no cure for the coronavirus or COVID-19.
In July 2020, I had a short conversation with Dr. Joan Crawford, M.D., at Eastlake Cardiovascular, St. Clair Shores, Michigan. I asked a few questions about what she has been seeing at the hospitals with which she was associated, which were, basically, in the eastern part of the Detroit-Metropolitan area. By the way, I report that Dr. Joan Crawford was not geared to working with patients with the coronavirus or COVID-19, and she was only concerned with patients' heart problems. Dr. Joan Crawford noted, that when she was passing through ER areas, she most often saw black men in beds, and she said that they most often were overweight and had diabetes, and they men were usually older than 40 years of age. The hospitals where Dr. Joan Crawford worked some days of the week were tied to communities that had whites and blacks and others, but it looked as if older black men were more susceptible to getting ill than others were in the early stages of the coronavirus spread.
Since April 2004 , I have posted documents at the website for The Hologlobe Press, and some of those documents are monthly presentations about television in the Detroit area and in the country, and the documents are known as Television History and Trivia documents, and in the spring of 2020, I used several of the documents to show what Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer said in press conferences in relation to the coronavirus event in Michigan, such as the number people with coronavirus and about "lock downs" for the state (such as about not traveling), and, for example, some information about Gretchen Whitmer was put into Television and History and Trivia #192 (which can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #192 link) and Television History of Trivia #193 (which can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #193 link). In the spring of 2020 in several press conferences, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (whom I define as a hard-line socialist of the Democratic Party) really showed off the rottenness of her mind and the minds of her associates, such as Lt. Governor Garlin Gilchrist (a black and a Democrat), and what she and her associated did was work to push the idea that the medical community in Michigan is racist, and Gretchen Whitmer pushed the idea that there are "deep inadequacies" in Michigan in relation to health care, and she pushed the idea that, basically, the medical community in Michigan is racist against blacks. It was on August 5, 2020, when Gretchen Whitmer said in a press conference--"..Today, I also signed an executive directive declaring racism as a public health crisis in Michigan. I want to thank the Michigan Legislative Black Council for their leadership. This pandemic has confirmed and highlighted the deadly nature of these pre-existing inequalities caused by systemic racism....". Yet, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer never touted therapeutics, such as hydroxychloroquine, as possible helpful tools against the coronavirus or COVID-19, and, in addition, Gretchen Whitmer pushed having coronavirus-infected patients put in nursing homes, which were places with people who already had health problems or were old or had weak body systems, and that was something like what New York Governor Andrew Cuomo did, pushing coronavirus-infected people into nursing homes, and his action led to the deaths of many [Note: I will say that the stories about nursing homes and Gretchen Whitmer and about nursing homes and Andrew Cuomo have yet to be completed, such as by honorable people and honorable writers.].
On December 9, 2020, a video entitled "It's a HORRIBLE time in history to be Honest and Ethical. People love the LIE" was posted on YouTube. The video features testimony from Dr. Pierre Kory, who is, for example, related to an entity called the "Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance" and to the St. Luke's Aurora Medical Center. In the video, Dr. Pierre Kory talks about an anti-viral called "ivermectin", which has been around for some time, and talks about using it to defeat COVID-19. The talk was given at a hearing (entitled "Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of the EN SVVID-19 Solution") at the U.S. Senate (related to the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs) on December 8, 2020. See the video!
[Note: In the spring of 2020, especially around April 2020, the Democrats and people in parts of the federal government (such as the FDA), were putting down using hydroxychloroquine, saying it was dangerous, but some doctors did use it, such as on a state representative of Michigan and her husband, who thanked U.S. President Donald J. Trump for making hydroxychloroquine more known. Keep in mind--then--in the spring, hydroxychloroquine was a decades-old drug and was not dangerous (when used properly). By the way, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (a Democrat and a socialist and a feminist (a.k.a. for all of them "enslavist")) was putting down and not promoting the drug while pushing the idea that blacks were dying of COVID-19 because the medical community was racist against blacks, and some Democrats around the country were pushing the idea that U.S. President Donald J. Trump was promoting the drug because he had stock in the company making the drug. "Ivermectin" is a known drug, and medical people know how to use it and handle it. Hold it! On December 14, 2020, the first person in the United States of America, who was in Florida, received a vaccine shot for COVID-19; companies that had developed the drug delayed telling the world that their work was done till right after the election of November 3, 2020. In December 2020, once it looked as if Donald J. Trump was no longer going to be the U.S. president, the people of the American Medical Association were saying that hydroxychloroquine could be used.]
Here is a story about Ivermectin. On December 29, 2020, a woman named Judith Smemthiewicz of Cheektowaga, New York, was taken in an ambulance to Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, New York, because she was ill with COVID-19. She was put in intensive care and in a ventilator. There, A doctor gave her Ivermectin on January 2, 2021--one shot--and she got better, and she was soon moved to another area of the hospital, where she took a turn for the worse, and then a doctor in the other area would not give her Ivermectin. It took a lawsuit to get a judge to order that Ivermectin be given to Judith Smemthiewicz, and she it was given her, she got well.
On June 2, 2021, an entity called Breitbart published an article entitled "ANTHONY FAUCI IGNORED EMAIL FROM PHYSICIST CLAIMING HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE COULD HELP BATTLE CORONVIRUS" (which was written by Jacob Bliss). The article noted that, in March 2020, a man named Erik Nielsen (a physicist) sent information to Dr. Anthony Fauci that suggested ciclesonide (or Alvesco) and hydroxychloroquine seemed to be effective in battling COVID-19. The article passed along the idea that Dr. Anthony Fauci ignored the information from Erik Nielsen, and the article presented the idea that Dr. Anthony Fauci considered the email from Erik Nielsen to be too long to take time to see.
On September 6, 2021, and September 7, 2021, at least some people were learning that the U.S. federal government supplied money to entities in China to work on, in essence, COVID-19-related research, such as "gain-of-function" research. Two of the entities were the Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. A good and smart person in the United States of America has to wonder why the hell was U.S. money going to China, especially in relation to something that could be highly dangerous to man? News reports showed that Dr. Anthony Fauci (who was the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) lied about the funding process, which involved him, and the funding process was tied to, for example, an entity called the EchoHealth Alliance. [Curanaj, Lidia. "Report: Wuhan lab documents show Fauci lied about 'gain of function' research." wabcradio.com, 7 September 2021.; Justice, Tristan. "New Details Of Fauci Funding Chinese Gain-of-Function Research Vindicate Rand Paul." thefederalist.com, 7 September 2021.; Lerner, Sharon, and Mara Hvistendahl. "New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research at Chinese Lab." theintercept.com, 6 September 2021, 9:06 p.m..]
I have sort of a side note here. In September 2021, I was hearing information that noted that some pharmacies, such as those associated with the big chain stores like CVS, are refusing to fill prescriptions for ivermectin, and, for example, that type of information was passed along on the nationally syndicated radio show known as The Charlie Kirk Show (on September 21, 2021). If a doctor prescribes ivermectin for a person (a patient)--whatever the reason--how can a pharmacy refuse to fill the prescription, given it is not the job of a pharmacy to determine what the person should get and should not get (which is done by the doctor in association with the person)? It seems pharmacies could be and should be sued for not filling prescriptions.
In around 2021 (at least), a man named Dennis Prager hosted a nationally syndicated weekday radio show entitled The Dennis Prager Show. For the week of Monday, October 11, 2021, Dennis Prager did not do hosting for at least a few days, and the show was being hosted by substitutes. Then, on Monday, October 18, 2021, Dennis Prager was back on the air, and he was not sounding really well, and Dennis Prager reported that he had gotten a COVID-19 illness. At about 2:45 p.m. (Detroit time) on October 18, 2021, the doctor who was treating Dennis Prager called in to the program, and he passed along some thoughts. The doctor--Dr. Jeff Barke (of California)--believed Dennis Prager would be doing worse in relation to health, if he had not been using ivermectin before getting ill and if he had not gotten "regeneron" treatment. Dr. Jeff Barke had stern words for the medical community, pharmacies, and the federal government. Because entities, such as hospitals are refusing to give COVID-19-ill patients "regeneron" treatment--which has been shown to be highly useful in beating down COVID-19--Dr. Jeff Barke said that it is "criminal" in nature, and he passed along the idea that it is almost as if they (such people in the federal government, especially the people of the Joe Biden administration) want people to die. Dr. Jeff Barke noted that hospitals are often putting down "regeneron" and only pushing "remdesiver," which--as he noted on the air--can cause kidney problems and other health problems. One point that Dr. Jeff Barke said was that the federal government--which now has control over the distribution of regeneron--is purposely making it harder for doctors to get "regeneron" for their patients, and another point that Dr. Jeff Barke made was the Kaiser (a big medical-related entity) has refused to give patients hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Dr. Jeff Barke said--"...We're literally killing people.". Both Dennis Prager and Dr. Jeff Barke reported to the audience that it was hard to get regeneron for Dennis Prager because of the rottenness that is going on, such as in California with pharmacies, a number of which will not follow orders of doctors to give out regeneron.
In around October 21, 2021, a good percentage of the people in the country were vaccinated at least with one dose or shot related to COVID-19, and many people probably had natural immunity, and for the last nearly two years, it had been said that really only about two-percent of the population of the country even had to worry about COVID-19, since only a small percentage of people made up the group of the those who were more prone to serious illness or death from COVID-19 (not unlike what happens with flu, which kills some people each year). On October 21, 2021, Joseph Biden was the center of a "town-hall"-type television broadcast on CNN, and the event was headed by Anderson Cooper (a socialist at least). During the event, Joseph Biden once again pushed the issue that unvaccinated people were the big problem today, and in what people later would say was mocking of people who were anti-vaccination, Joseph Biden said--"...I have the freedom to kill you with my COVID!....". A good and smart person can see that Joseph Biden was actually mocking "freedom" (which is anti-communistic). What type of man--who is supposed to be a U.S. president--would say a statement like that from Joseph Biden? I say that it is a man who would stab you in the face with a knife, if he could get away with it, which is the way of the communist and such.
Here is status report segment, which was added on Sunday, October 24, 2021. At this time, it was not really, really, really proven that the COVID-19 event came from a lab in China, a communist country and an enemy country to the United States of America (under the way it should be under The United States Constitution, which is a document that is not supported by the Democratic Party in the United States of America, which promotes and follows the way of communism, socialism, liberalism, progressivism, and such, which are rotten forms of government). However, during the week of Monday, October 18, 2021, a number of news reports were published on the Internet about the Wuhan virus (COVID-19), the National Institutes of Health (or the NIH), Dr. Anthony Fauci, Lawrence Tabak (of the NIH), Richard Ebright (a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University), and more, and one theme was presented in a letter issued by Richard Ebright that made the point that, indeed, grants from the National Institutes of Health to ultimately Chinese researchers, which had gone through EcoHealth Alliance (an entity in the United States of America that ultimately passed the money over to the Chinese) did involve "gain-of-function" research, which is work to make a virus of some type more deadly to humans. A good and smart person must ask--Why did any money from the United States of America go to an entity--specifically a lab that works on harmful viruses--in China? On October 24, 2021, it was looking as if Dr. Anthony Fauci did lie in the past, such as in federal-government hearings, by saying no government money went to "gain-of-function" research. More on the events of the week of Monday October 19, 2021, can be found in such articles as "NIH letter appears to conflict with Fauci, Collins claims about Wuhan lab" [Schemmel, Alec. "NIH letter appears to conflict with Fauci, Collins claims about Wuhan lab." abcnews4.com, 21 October 2021.], "'Bombshell' NIH letter on bat coronavirus research reveals Fauci's big lie, professor says" [Dunleavy, Jerry (The Washington Examiner). "'Bombshell' NIH letter on bat coronavirus research reveals Fauci's big lie, professor says." yahoo.com, 24 October 2021, 1:45 a.m..], "Remembering Those Journalists Who Helped Cover for Anthony Fauci's 'Gain-of-Function' Misdirection" [Schorr, Isaac (The National Review). "Remembering Those Journalists Who Helped Cover for Anthony Fauci's 'Gain-of-Function' Misdirection." yahoo.com, 21 October 2021, 1:03 p.m..], and "NIH says grantee failed to report experiment in Wuhan that created a bat virus that made mice sicker" [Kaiser, Jocelyn. "NIH says grantee failed to report experiment in Wuhan that created a bat virus that made mice sicker." Science, 21 October 2021, 4:15 p.m..]. It is a fact that U.S. money went to China for virus research, and that is rotten, and it shows what rottenness exists in the government of the United States of America--in the form of people, especially those tied to the Democratic Party.
For about 25 years, Sean Hannity was been a nationally known radio-show host and television-show host, and in around September 23, 2021, he was hosting his nationally syndicated radio program for weekdays called The Sean Hannity Show, and on September 23, 2021, Sean Hannity had a man named Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., as a guest, and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. had been involved with, for example, mRNA research (which is related to vaccines) and was a nationally known immunologist. During one hour of The Sean Hannity Show, Sean Hannity and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., passed along thoughts about COVID-19 or the coronavirus, such as about the vaccines and treatments, and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., made the point that the elderly and the obese are the most at risk from the virus. The next day--at least--some communistic news entities worked to put down Dr. Robert Malone, M.D.; for example, Media Matters (a communist news entity) pushed out the article entitled "Hannity continues radio campaign to undermine COVID-19 vaccines, hosts guest who claims unvaccinated Americans are at risk from the vaccinated" [Karet, Brendan. "Hannity continues radio campaign to undermine COVID-19 vaccines, hosts guest who claims unvaccinated Americans are at risk from the vaccinated." mediamatters.org, 24 September 2021, 5:11 pm. EDT.]. Despite the criticism against Sean Hannity and Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., the interview was run again (as a repeat) on October 11, 2021, and this section of the document presents much of the material of the interview (at least most of comments made by Dr. Robert Malone, M.D.).
I start off with material from Dr. Robert Malone. He said--"....Actually, you got something a little bit wrong. Ah, the J&J vaccine--and I've heard this before--the J&J vaccine is not a traditional vaccine technology. Okay? All three of those are, basically, gene-therapy technologies applied to vaccines. The J&J technology has never been rolled out at this level. In fact, it stems from the same laboratory at the same time that I was in when I had the mRNA discoveries, that being the lab in...at the Salk Institute of Molecular Biology and Virology Lab. So I'm very familiar with both...." I note, in late 2020, it was announced that supposed effective vaccines were developed or nearly developed, and the three company-types that soon arrived were from--Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Moderna. During the interview, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. noted that, in essence, a gene of the COVID-19 is put to a cold-like virus, which is then grown, and the resulting thing is put in to people, and, basically, a person's cells are the manufacturing entity for "the final vaccine product", and he noted that that is different from a traditional vaccine, such as one related to flu, in which a purified fragment of a virus is put in a medium, such as egg material, and mixed with things to make it more reactive, and the resulting product is injected. These current vaccines related to COVID-19 are more like "attenuated vaccines" (like polio vaccines).
Now, I present four main pieces of thought in text form that came from Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., in the interview.:
So, uhm, let's start with efficacy. So, there's, uhm, the language you'll hear is efficacy and effectiveness. Efficacy is something that's measured in a clinical trial, which often will overepresent how good something is, uhm, because of the, the controlled nature of doing a clinical trail. Effectiveness is how good does it work in the field, in the real world. Okay? So those are two key words. And the efficacy that you're talking about from these relatively modest, very brief initial clinical trials that they rushed, uhm, was efficacy. You're, you're citing the, the numbers for death and disease, protection against death and disease. That's different from protection against infection or replication or spread. Okay? So it turns out that even back in the day, uhm, when we were dealing with the original strains that are the ones that are matched to these vaccines, 'cause now we got different viruses basically that aren't matched to these current vaccines. Uhm, but back on the day, what they didn't disclose, you know, wasn't in the press, and you're no stranger to the, the, ah, let's say, legacy media, uhm, ah, just basically regurgitating whatever pablum the government gives them and the pharmaceutical companies give them. So that's what he had. They just kind of regurgitated it to us. They didn't ask questions. But, in fact, the ability of the vaccines to block infection was not anywhere near ninety percent. Now, what we have is, uhm, evolved strains. So this is, you know, fundamental Darwinian evolution kind of stuff, where you have selective pressure imposed by the vaccines. And no surprise, because you only have a single antigen, a single protein from the virus that's being produced in the vaccinated, uhm, no surprise that the virus is evolving to escape that, ah, immune pressure caused by those vaccines. Now, there's another wrinkle to this in that, uhm, generally we use vaccines before we have a pandemic. Right? That's how we need to try to get them out. And that's a different situation. Vaccinating into an ongoing pandemic when there's a whole lot of virus circulating is a whole different kettle of fish. And what happens then is you really do have a setup for development of these escape mutes, which is what you're seeing. The virus is evolving to escape the vaccines, and it will continue to do so, particularly if we have a universal vaccination policy. And what, what we're at risk for with this universal policy is we're gonna to continue to generate escape mutants, and they will converge on escape mutants that--and this is happening, we can see it, and if you follow the genetics, it's kind of complex stuff but it's for sure happening--it will drive toward some common variant that's really good a replicating and escaping the vaccine. And then what happens, oh, the people that really needed the vaccine the most--the elderly, the obese, the immuno-suppressed--they're no longer going to have first-line protection. They're going to be back where they were before, only with viruses that are even more highly replication competent, because that's the other thing that's happened is these new variants replicate at much higher levels, whether you're vaccinated or not. So if you get infected, if you're vaccinated, here's the paradox. That's it's just--a lot of people are waking up to this. Okay? That there's all this talk that it's the unvaccinated that are creating risk for the vaccinated. Now, that just doesn't make sense when you think it through, if these vaccines are worth a grain of salt.
Precisely. Yeah. Right. Okay. So how, how does it make any sense at all that the unvaccinated are the ones that are the problem? In fact, what's happening is that the vaccinated are, when they are infected, and these--we now know with these new strains that they're--the protection against infection is something like forty to sixty percent. Okay? So it's really not that great. And if you do get infected, your chance of having severe disease is lower. Well, that sounds good. Right? That's a good thing.
Here's, here's, here's the wrinkle in that. Okay. Is that what that means is the folks that are vaccinated are still getting infected. They're replicating virus in their bodies at the same or higher levels than they were before. They're shedding virus at the same or higher levels than they were before. Remember, at the beginning of the outbreak when we talked about super spreaders? We've created a whole huge bunch of super spreaders. So the truth is it's the unvaccinated that are at risk from the vaccinated. Does that make sense?
Yes, it's true. But the difference is that now we have folks walking around who think they're perfectly health, but in fact are making a lot of virus, and we have a lot of those people doing that. So, that's the difference. You look at it sideways, different from what you're being told. You know, you know, it should be that the vaccinated are protected, they're not at risk from the unvaccinated. That should be the way it is.
In the interview, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., said about the viruses--"...I think they've been rushed. I think that's pretty clear. Two key things--we needed more information about the adverse events--the risk of the vaccine--and the other was that, uhm, the database structure that the CDC had used to capture these adverse events was broken. It wasn't working. That was really controversial at the time, but both things have now been proven true. So in terms in my point of view, uhm, these were rushed...." and "...Based on the current data, it makes sense to vaccinate people sixty-five and older, morbidly obese, and people with immune deficiencies...." and "...We should go ahead and make available the variety of drugs largely anti-inflamatories--not perfect--but, uhm, that are being used by physicians all over the world to keep people out of the hospital, keep them from dying, and keep them from developing...." [Note: Sean Hannity stepped on or talked over Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., for the last material that I presented, not allowing me to understand the remainder of the sentence.]. Dr. Robert Malone also noted that steroids are a solution, and he urged people to make sure that their vitamin D levels are not low, and based on data, he noted that good levels of vitamin D in a person can help the person fight off COVID-19. Later, Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., said--"...The, ah, current vaccine products--and there's new one coming that are second-generation products--but the current vaccine products all rely on the spike protein, and the spike protein was the focus because it was known that, uhm, ah, that protein would provide pretty good protection, and so it was a safe bet....". But in relation to the previous sentence, it was said that the spike-protein theme only results in small blocking potential overall or a small neutralizing range. Since the variants are not directly target by the vaccine, Dr. Robert Malone noted that "We're vaccinating for yesterday's virus.". One of the final main thoughts from Dr. Robert Malone, M.D., which applied to more doses of a vaccine for a person--"...Many vaccinologists, myself included, think that overvaccinating for flu is, is actually not a good thing. One of the things that's kind of, ah, a little bit worrisome about this, ah, we're just gonna ahead and give everybody a jab every six months strategy is there's a thing called high-zone tolerance and another thing called original antigenic sin. So those are fancy immunology words. But what they equate to is that more is not always better with vaccines. More vaccination or frequent vaccination can in some cases actually make it so that you're less able to amount an immune response....".
So Joseph Biden as the U.S. president has pushed out the idea that the unvaccinated are the people who are the problem, killing people, but I find that, for example, the government has done more to kill people than the unvaccinated, since government people have put down therapeutics, such as hydroxychloroquine, and put COVID-19-infected people in nursing homes, which led to the death of thousands, and it seems government people have lied about things or not passed along good information about things. Today, I have yet to learn if certain types of people in the world are more resistant to being hurt by COVID-19-related viruses than other are. For example, it seems very likely that people who have sickle-cell anemia, such as those with African heritage, are people who could have big health problems if they have COVID-19 illness. Do people with heritage that includes various European plagues have a better time surviving a COVID-19-type attack? Remember--History shows that some people get HIV (a virus) and never develop the deadly AIDS (which was a big concern around the world in the 1980s). A database about types of people would be helpful, since it would show what types of people have to be watched over more carefully and be more cautious about where they go and such. Does the idea of having children wear masks all the time have something to do with hurting children in the long run? When children are young, they are usually healthy, and they can be more healthy than the elderly can be, and if children are wearing masks all the time, they become less exposed to all the types of diseases and viruses and germs that are out in the world, and they become less developed or strong at fighting diseases and viruses and germs later in life. Childrens' wearing masks all the time makes it harder for childrens' immune systems to become strong and to become able to take on more things, especially later in life. Why has government, such as the Joseph Biden administration and the Gretchen Whitmer administration, been so bent on putting down ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, when both drugs have been used safely for many years, if done by someone skilled at using such drugs (such as real doctors)? Repurposing of drugs does happen. By the way, in August 2021, someone at the Federal Drug Administration (or the FDA) of the federal government put out this Tweet in relation to using ivermectin (which came off as childish)--"...You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.". History shows that the federal government--at least under the control of Joseph Biden as the U.S. president--has worked to limit the supply of monoclonal antibodies (used to fight COVID-19) to some states, such as Florida, which happened in late 2021 [Note: On October 14, 2021, while writing the main body of this document, I heard a guest on The Sean Hannity Show report that he has had a very hard time getting monoclonal antibody material for the last month and a half.]. Why would the Joseph Biden and other Democrats want to limit the supply of what can help people? The answer can be shown in other actions by such people, which show their disregard for non-communists, non-socialists, non-progressives, non-liberals, and such. For example, Joseph Biden killed the Keystone Pipeline, which was giving people jobs, and the Joseph Biden adminstration has let the border between Mexico and the United States of America disappear, except on paper (it seems for now). Evidence shows that Democrats in government positions, such that of the U.S. president, are working to damage the country, and cutting back on what can keep people healthy is a way in which to damage the good people of the country, and that is the way of, for instance, communists and those who wish to turn a place from one form of government that is not based on enslavism to a country based on enslavism, like communism.
[Note: Any country that has a health-care system completely controlled by the government is a rotten country, because the government can deny health care to whomever it wants, and, clearly, the Democratic Party, which supports communism, wants the country to have a health-care system, such as a "universal health-care system," that is completely controlled by the government, and that is the nature of evil.]
On November 8, 2021, I listened to The Mark Levin Show (a nationally distributed radio show), which is hosted by Mark R. Levin. In the third hour of the show, Mark R. Levin interviewed Peter Navarro, who had had a book released to the public on November 2, 2021, and the book was called In Trump Time: My Journal of America's Plague Year. Peter Navarro worked in the U.S. President Donald J. Trump administration, and he worked closely with U.S. President Donald J. Trump. Mark R. Levin and Peter Navarro only had a short amount of time to talk about the book, given the interview was done on radio. For one, Peter Navarro, whose book was based on, for example, a journal that he had related to the U.S. President Donald J. Trump time, noted how the vaccine for COVID-19 was purposely delayed by people in the federal government who were working against U.S. President Donald J. Trump and by a vaccine maker, and that was in late 2019, and Peter Navarro noted that the actions surely led to the deaths of people, and Peter Navarro reported that his book shows that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a rotten man and should be put in prison, such as for omitting information to the public about COVID-19.
While I write this section, I am remembering that COVID-19 was created by communists and socialists tied to China, such as at a lab, and in the federal government of the United States of America, such as Anthony Fauci, and the date is November 28. 1921. On November 26 2021, I heard a woman, who was, in essence, a scientist, pass along some information about virus stuff on The Mark Levin Show at about 8:40 p.m. (Detroit time), and the woman noted that COVID-19 will never be wiped out, such as through vaccinations, since COVID-19 can be related to animals, too, or can get in animals, too. And in around November 27, 2021, people were seeing and hearing news stories that reported that there was yet another variant of "SARS-CoV-2" (informally known as COVID-19), and the variant was called "Omicron." On November 28, 2021, "COVID-19" existed as at least Delta, Alpha, Gamma, Beta, and Omicron types, and on the date, the medical community of the world had yet to really take up research in developing even more types of cures related to COVID-19--everything (almost) was about the vaccines and masks. [Note: And people are hearing about "breakthrough" cases of COVID-19, and it is no wonder to me.]
So has your favorite television newscast or newscaster ever reported on lung inflammation related to COVID-19 and to vitamin D? At least a few news stories about vitamin D in relation to COVID-19 did get published around November 2021. One story that I found about the subject was "Study shows how vitamin D could halt lung inflammation [Sabay, Yasemin Nicola. "Study shows how vitamin D could halt lung inflammation." medicalnewstoday.com, 26 November 2021.], and yet another story that I found was "Researchers study the link between vitamin D in inflammation ["Researchers study the link between vitamin D and inflammation." purdue.edu, 18 November 2021.]. Basically, stories about vitamin D and inflammation-hindering hinted that vitamin D (though not the over-the-count type) might be useful in reducing inflammation in the lungs of a person afflicted with COVID-19. What I was finding or hearing at least around November 2021 is that people will low vitamin D levels in their bodies were having a harder time dealing with COVID-19 than people with good levels of vitamin D in their bodies.
I have to note that little push was made in the United States of America by the medical community and the government to make therapeutics highly important in the fight against COVID-19--the push was mostly about vaccines--and the American media, especially the so-called main media, did not push the issue about using therapeutics, especially monoclonal antibodies, in a bigger way.
Once again, I have to bring up the name of Mark R. Levin. On December 8, 2021, Mark R. Levin had a man named Dr. Scott W. Atlas as a phone-in guest on The Mark Levin Show, and they talked about Dr. Scott W. Atlas's time in the White House when Donald Trump was the U.S. president, and they talked about troubles that took place in relation to COVID-19 during Donald Trump's time as the U.S. president, such as the hindrance known as Dr. Anthony Fauci. Much of the trouble that took place was not talked about during the radio interview, but it was noted that Scott W. Atlas's new book tells the story about what happened in the 2020 era with COVID-19. The book is entitled A Plague Upon Our House My Fight at the Trump White House to Stop COVID from Destroying America, and it is recommended by me for those who wish to understand more about the COVID-19 event. [Note: In addition, a person could get information about what Mark R. Levin and Dr. Scott W. Atlas talked about--which took place in the third hour of The Mark Levin Sow for December 8, 2021--by listening to the audio material of the interview, which is available through "marklevinshow.com". Oh, by the way, Scott W. Atlas noted during the interview that it is commonplace for a virus to mutate and that the mutant variations get weaker and weaker as the mutation process goes along. The idea matches that theme that there is a killing strength difference between the Delta version (the first main version of COVID-19, which appeared in 2019 and 2020) and the Omicrom version (of 2021).]
I have a general-commentary or general-thought section here, which is added on January 4, 2022. The communists of China with help of communists in the government of the United States of America, such as Anthony Fauci, pushed death upon the world by creating the whole COVID-19 mess in 2019, and that is fact. Since 2019, the communists and like people (some of whom call themselves "progressives") in the United States of America have restricted use of therapeutics to combat the various forms of COVID-19, which will never be killed off for good since it is a virus that can be spread by animals, and there is no way in which you can mask every animal in the world and stop the virus from spreading and mutating. By the way, around December 13, 2021, the staffers at the John Ball Zoo in Grand Rapids, Michigan, were having to deal with at least a tiger who had COVID-19 [Kessler, Devon. "Tiger at Grand Rapids' John Ball Zoo tests positive for COVID-19." upnorthlive.com, 13 December 2021.]. In 2020, Democrats, such as Governor of Michigan Gretchen Whitmer, who pushed the idea that the medical community was racist against blacks, worked to put down the using of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, and in late 2021 and early 2022, it was clear that the Joseph Biden administration was purposely restricting the use and supplies of monoclonal antibodies in the fight against COVID-19, such as the Omicron version, and at the same time, there was no push by the Joseph Biden administration to increase supplies greatly, such as by opening up more medical factories to make monoclonal antibodies, and the Joseph Biden administration was pushing the nonsense of getting more people vaccinated and getting more free test kits out in the public, such as 500,000,000 more test kits ["Governor Ron DeSantis to Biden Administration: Release stronghold on Life-saving Monoclonal Antibodies." flgov.com, 3 January 2022.; Cancryn, Adam. "Biden's team tightens grip on state use of Covid antibody treatment." Politico, 14 September 2021, 05:12 p.m. EDT.; Keshner, Andrew. "Biden plans to distribute 500 million at-home COVID-19 tests. These states and cities already provide free tests." marketwatch, 25 December 2021, 10:37 a.m.; Quintana, Andrews. "Florida surgeon general unhappy with fed's distribution of monoclonal antibody treatments." wtsp.com, 30 December 2021, 3:08 p.m. EST.]. It must be remembered that over-vaccinating can be a problem, making vaccinating counterproductive, and yet the Joseph Biden Administration kept pushing for one dose and two doses and three doses and even more it seems [Note: A vaccine can come in two forms--(1) a live material or (2) a dead material related to the thing being fought against, and the live type can cause sickness in a few people.]. It is also known that having more test kits is rather useless in comparison to having more monoclonal antibodies available in the country (and having more is so that there does not have to be rationing of monoclonal antibodies). Remember--If you are tested one day and are called clear, you could get the virus the next day [Note: I have heard of a lot of cases, such as with football players, of false positives and false negatives.]. In addition, it has been shown that, for the most part, masks are useless, since the virus particle is too small to be stopped by almost all types of masks that exist. [Note: I wonder--Would the same number of people have gotten badly ill or have died if no masks or few masks had been used?] In December 2021, information finally reached the public that Pfizer had a COVID-19 treatment pill available for use, and it was called Paxlovid, and soon Merck had a treatment pill available. In November 2021, it looked as if the first cases of COVID-19 in the Omicron version were being reported on, such as in South Africa, such as by Dr. Angelique Coetzee, who was reporting that Omicron was no big deal, and she was reporting the treated often was cortisone and something like Ibuprofen, and she was reporting that no antibodies or oxygen were being used in therapies in South Africa, and though that information was available, the Joseph Biden administration said, in essence, nothing about the news over the next few weeks at least. And a good and smart person must keep in mind that the Joseph Biden administration, since January 2021, has been letting countless (such as thousands and thousands) illegal aliens enter the country easily at the border with Mexico, and it seems that many of the people are very likely to have health problems, such as as carriers of diseases, such as COVID-19, and it seems the Joseph Biden administration has been working to get Americans so-called vaccinated in relation to COVID-19 so that there would be less noticing of COVID-19 cases showing up in the country that can be attributed to the illegal aliens. It must be remembered that, because of federal government information or disinformation or lack of information or government pressure, some doctors and pharmacists and drug stores would not pass along therapeutics to people.
[Note: I have to talk about masks. In essence, when people, especially children, wear masks regularly, they become less exposed to dealing with germs on a daily basis, so their immune systems can get weaker over time. For instance, while children, who really do not have to worry about dying from COVID-19, wear masks all the time at schools, they are probably not having their bodies deal with as many germs on a daily basis. I think masks can make the population weaker in the long run, especially if masks are not really needed, given there are therapeutics.]
Here are some more general thoughts--as if I am talking aloud while pondering. Are people who have pets, such as dogs and cats, more likely to get COVID-19, since animals, who may not show signs of illness, end up all over the place, such as during outside walks, and pick up the COVID-19, and the families then touch and hug their pets? Do people who try to drink too much purified stuff, such as bottled water (which they use instead of tap water or well water), get COVID-19 more easily because their immune systems are less strong, fighting less of the stuff in the environment from day to day? Are some people likely to get COVID-19 whether or not they wore masks because their bodies are more prone to getting ill because of COVID-19? Since 2019, the federal government seems to only push out the idea that the COVID-19 virus was mostly transmitted from person to person through the air, but could there have been more ways, such as through touching and using ATM machines and lottery machines and vending machines, in which COVID-19 was more likely to spread? Since 2019, I did not see or hear of a big breakout in COVID-19 cases at the grocery stores, and I did not hear of grocery stores getting closed down in great numbers because of COVID. Why is that? Are people with poor oral hygiene more likely to get and transmit COVID-19? Is house or living-quarters hygiene a problem that has to be considered? [For decades, my main cleaning agent has been bleach, and bleach has been on my hands regularly for decades, and maybe guys who do not clean bathrooms, such as with bleach regularly, are more likely to have problems with COVID-19 or whatever.] Why has not the government come up with data that shows what types of people are more likely to have ill effects from COVID-19, such as those with sickle-cell anemia or those who are American Indian or those from certain parts of the Mediterranean, such as southern Italy, or those who are from certain parts of Africa? I have wondered if types of people with more oil in their skin are more likely to pass along COVID-19, given the oil could be a good transport medium, and that is why COVID-19 might pass along easily within some types of families, such as those of African heritage [Note: More oil in the skin through evolution was important for people tied to Africa so that their skin would not dry out in the sun and crack, which could lead to infection and death. I do note that I have heard it said that studies indicate that passing the COVID-19 virus is not really tied to touching things]. What percentage of COVID-19 patients who get in bad shape have been users of cigarettes or cigars or vamping products or marijuana? It seems 98 percent of the people in the country really did not have to worry about COVID-19, as is the case with flu, and yet the federal government kept pushing the issue of vaccines and vaccines and vaccines and not therapeutics [Note: A person who gets COVID-19 and recovers, such as with help of therapeutics, will have a better body defense against COVID-19 in the future, and that defense (immunity) will be better than a vaccination.]. So, around week 15 of the NFL football season for 2021, some one-hundred players were out of action because of COVID-19 protocol stuff, and yet most players were vaccinated it seems, so why were there so many "breakthrough" cases? It seems the vaccines are no real barrier to variants of COVID-19 Delta, given the original vaccines were highly targeted and not broad-scale or broad-based attacks. What is the reason that the Omicron version spread so fast around the world, especially given so many people around the world were vaccinated? Something does not add up! Why has not the medical community yelled and screamed loudly and regularly and publicly, such as at the Joseph Biden administration, to have more therapeutics made, especially monoclonal antibodies, instead of putting up with more tests and masks?
Oh, I have this side note. In December 2021, I ended up at my hairing-cutting gal's new place, after having been to her a number of times at her home, and I learned something. I was already aware she had had been in the hospital with COVID-19 in 2020, but I learned she had had very low levels of vitamin D in her body in the recent past.
This document has already provided some information about Dr. Robert Malone, and now it has some information about Dr. Pete McCullough. In 2021, basically, Dr. Pete McCullough was putting down how the of COVID-19 mess was being handled, and in September 2021, Baylor Scott & White Health was working to stop Dr. Pete McCullough from was saying he was tied to Baylor Scott & White Health, though he was not, and the entity took out a restraining order against him, which was designed to get him to stop saying that he was tied to Baylor Scott & White Health. It looks as if, in 2021, Dr. Pete McCullough was sort of a media celebrity, being a guest on television and radio programs that talked about COVID-19 things. Around in 2021, especially by the end of 2021, some legitimate and non-legitimate news entities were considering Dr. Pete McCullough as controversial.
Now that you have that information, and I have this information. On Thursday, December 30, 2021, The Charlie Kirk Show podcast was an episode called "Uncensored with Dr. Pete McCullough" [Note: The podcast material was not broadcast originally in The Charlie Kirk Show radio program, which is distributed on weekdays nationally.]. During the program, Dr. Pete McCullough talked about how early treatment for COVID-19 has not been well done by hospitals and such over the history of COVID-19, such as with monoclonal antibodies and other things that Dr. Pete McCullough and associates have been using. Dr. Pete McCullough noted that using a weak iodine solution to clean out the nose (several times a day) would be useful in putting down the COVID-19 virus. It was reported that vaccines do not stop the transmission of COVID-19, as had been known at least since the summer of 2021. The current rise in the cases of COVID-19--while the omicron version was then the big story--was not a problem tied to the unvaccinated. And it was hinted that, if more people would have been given early treatment with therapeutics, there would have been fewer deaths tied to COVID-19, and Dr. Pete McCullough did note that many deaths have been wrongly attributed to COVID-19 [Note: I can say that, by December 30, 2021, I had heard, in essence, no big push by the federal government and people in league with the federal government to get the public well-informed about early treatments for COVID-19 and to get people to push for early treatments with therapeutics by hospitals and such, and I had heard, in essence, only a push to get people vaccinated, and in early January 2022, it looked to me as if the vaccination--even through several doses--as not blocking omicron.]
[Note: You have nothing to lose by tracking down and listening to "Uncensored with Dr. Pete McCullough" of The Charlie Kirk Show (December 30, 2021).]
This section was added on January 9, 2022, and it is, in essence, a section that provides some history notes. In December 2021 and January 2021 (at least), and man named Joe Rogan (who issued regular audio programs through his podcast The Joe Rogan Experience) was sort of in the news, having ties to Dr. Pete McCullough (a cardiologist) and Dr. Robert Malone (a virologist), both of whom were being put down by some people who were saying that the two men were passing along false information about COVID-19. On December 13, 2021, Joe Rogan did an interview with Dr. Pete McCullough, and some days later, Joe Rogan did an interview with Dr. Robert Malone. Dr. Pete McCullough pushed out ideas that were counter to those of the federal government in relation to COVID-19, and an interview with Dr. Robert Malone had Dr. Robert Malone pushing the idea that it seems the federal government and people in league with the federal government have been working to push vaccines (only) as a part of a campaign related to "mass formation psychosis," getting people scared by what they were hearing of sickness and death and getting them to listen and follow a particular figure [like--I say--a Dr. Anthony Fauci], who they would follow like sheep. By January 2, 2022, news reports and such existed that showed that material on YouTube involving Joe Rogan and Dr. Pete McCullough and material on YouTube involving Joe Rogan and Dr. Robert Malone had been removed recently from YouTube by the operators of YouTube.
On January 7, 2022, the members of the U.S. Supreme Court were involved in hearing oral arguments related to a case in which the theme was whether or not Joseph Biden as the U.S. president has the power to impose mandates on businesses in related to COVID-19 and where Joseph Biden might get the power to make the mandates stand, such as through The United States Constitution, which does not offer such power (though governors of states might have the power). I heard audio portions of the oral-argument material on that day, and some of the justices passed along crap and passed along thoughts that had no ties to determining the issue at hand, and some material was done outright bullshit. For example, Sonia Sotomayor, a highly rotten women, said--"...Those numbers show that omicron is as deadly and causes as much serious disease in the unvaccinated as delta did....". First, I can say that that is a lie (as this document shows, such as by noting how people with omicron were being treated in South Africa in late 2021). In addition, in relation to her statement, the information being pushed by Sonia Sotomayor has no bearing on whether or not Joseph Biden has the power to make mandates on businesses related to COVID-19. Second, Sonia Sotomayor also said--"We have over 100,000 children, which we've never had before, in serious condition and many on ventilators....". There is nothing truthful in Sonia Sotomayor's statement about 100,000 children, and the statement shows why government--even the U.S. Supreme Court--should be limited in what it can do. Sonia Sotomayor also passed along something that had nothing to do with the issue at hand--whether or not Joseph Biden has the power to do such as such related to COVID-19--and Sonia Sotomayor pushed out the idea that she was not did know what states could impose the such and such and the federal government cannot (which deals with The United States Constitution and what powers the document gives to the federal government and what powers lie in the hands of the states). Elena Kagan also passed along thoughts that had nothing to do with the issue at hand, as if trying to cloud the issue and distract from the issue and backup her potentially defective reasons for allowing Joseph Biden to do such as such that she would issue in the future, and one thing that she said is that people have to be vaccinated to stop from transmitting COVID-19 to elderly or sick Medicare patients (which is wrong information, given vaccination does not stop transmission). Both Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor have shown themselves to be supporters of the ways of communism and socialism and progressivism and not supporters of The United States Constitution.
Okay, let me present reasons that, with Joseph Biden as the U.S. president, federal government entities related to medicine and other entities related to medicine can show off their rottenness without trouble and retribution. In April 2021, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (or the CDC) was a woman, and her name was Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and Dr. Rochelle Walensky, who had been associated with the Harvard Medical School as a teacher, pushed out the idea that racism is a public health crisis in the United States of America. In essence, in the summer of 2021, the American Medical Association started the push the idea that the notations of "male" or "female" should be removed from or not put on public birth certificates, hinting that the information about "male" or "female" causes more harm than good. And, yet, Dr. Rochelle Walensky and the people of the American Medical Association want people to take their recommendations as useful and trust them!
Here I have information from real doctors--not bureaucrats who are tied to medicine but have not practiced medicine with patients in decades or if ever, a good example of whom is Dr. Anthony Fauci. On Wednesday, January 12, 2022, I was listening to The Sean Hannity Show (a nationally syndicated radio show of weekday afternoons), and at one point, Sean Hannity had two doctors as guests. The two doctors were Bryan Tyson and George Fareed, who would have a book officially released to the public on January 24, 2022, and the book was called THE COVID DARKNESS: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients. In essence, the doctors through their new book and through the interview reported that they have done well in treating patients with COVID-19. A big point that was reported is that they used early treatment of patients, starting out in the early days of the pandemic. For example, they put down waiting to treat people with COVID-19 till they were noticeably ill. The two doctors started treatment with therapeutic drugs and cocktails and such as soon as a positive diagnosis was known, and they used a combination of materials to treat patients, such as monoclonal antibodies. If treatment was not given as soon as it was clearly known a patient had COVID-19, treatment might be ineffective, and delayed treatment could be to send people with symptoms home with an order to use aspirin and such and be in bed and monitor conditions, as could happen and did happen in, for example, New York (as had been reported on The Sean Hannity Show in the past). The doctors did use hydroxychloroquine. On The Sean Hannity Show, Dr. Bryan Tyson and George Fareed reported that they did indeed help thousands, but it was hinted that they had one death. The next day--Thursday, January 13, 2022--I happened to tune into WJR-AM (760) in Detroit, Michigan, during the 7:00 p.m. hour, and that was when an edition of a radio program called The Kolender Medical Show was on the air [Note: The Kolender Medical Show, which covers various topics of medicine, is regularly on the air on Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and Sundays at 3:00 p.m. on WJR-AM, and the show is sponsored by, basically, Dr. Brian Kolender (of Bingham Farms, Michigan), who is associated with Beaumont Hospital (of Royal Oak, Michigan). For the edition of the show of January 13, 2022, AnneMarie Cronin (the CEO of the AnneMarie Cronin Agency) was the host, and Siobhan Cronin, who happens to be known as a violinist mostly (it seems), was the co-host, and, of course, Dr. Brian Kolender was featured on the program. Some of the points put forth by Dr. Brian Kolender is that people should push to get early treatment and find a doctor who will set up early treatment. A doctor who would back off on early treatment should be avoided. Dr. Brian Kolender said that finding a good doctor can be difficult. Also, the show noted that "big box" pharmacies can be involved in not honoring prescriptions for therapeutics (as prescribed by doctors)--even today--so people should get involved with pharmacies (at least in relation to COVID-19) that are considered "compounding pharmacies" (such as independent pharmacies), and patients can do well by paying cash for medications, since drug insurance plans may balk as having prescriptions go through or get filled. I note that a person tied to the medical community (whose identity had to be kept secret) called in and reported that some pharmacies do indeed not fill prescriptions for therapeutics, especially if no positive test for COVID-19 can be shown. [Remember: The therapeutics that have been pushed since early in the pandemic have been shown to be harmless when used properly.] Dr. Brian Kolender made the point that the drug tests are unreliable, which was evident on the day because of how many vaccinated people were getting the Omicron variant. What I heard for the first time through the radio show, which shows up, for instance, the rottenness of the main media, is that vitamin I (vitamin i) has been shown to Dr. Brian Kolender to be helpful in treating people with COVID-19. For the record, I say that all the doctors were noting that Omicron was not serious and certainly was not as troubling as the Delta version had been, and, by the way, Dr. Bryan Tyson and Dr. George Fareed reported, on Wednesday, January 12, 2002, the doctors had had some 300 patients and the majority had been vaccinated against COVID-19 (and, in some cases, more than once), and on the program with Dr. Bryan Tyson and Dr. George Fareed, it was pointed out that the death statistics related to COVID-19 are defectdive, since there is a difference between "dying with COVID" (actually dying because of other things) and "dying of COVID", and people keeping records, such as at hospitals, have done poorly in making the distinction (which is a theme that has been reported by good news people and such since early in the pandemic).
[Note: What has been done by Dr. Brian Kolender, Bryan Tyson, and Dr. George Fareed has not been pushed as useful by the main media (such as the news entities tied to broadcast networks) and by the federal government, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and especially the Joseph Biden administration, and that shows rotteness in the media and federal government.]
Here is some information about fluvoxamine. On January 17, 2022, U.S. Senator Rand Paul was a guest on the nationally syndicated radio show called The Sean Hannity Show, and U.S. Senator Rand Paul, who is also a medical doctor, reported that some success was being found by using fluvoxamine in treating patients with COVID-19. It was the first time that I had heard someone talk about fluvoxamine on the radio, showing the media had been giving the drug little attention. On November 1, 2021, a video called "Fluvoxamine: a $4 Antidepressant That Reduced COVID 19 Hospitalizations" was published on YouTube, and the narrator was Dr. Roger Seheult (who was associated with MedCram and was an associate professor of the Riverside School of Medicine of the University of California). The video offered a report on a trial related to fluvoxamine, and the trial was related to subjects (patients) who had already surpassed the seven-days period (at least) of having COVID-19) or they were beyond seven days of on set. Dr. Roger Seheult referred to a published article in The Lancet that was called Effects of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of emergency care and hospitalization among patients with COVID-19: the TOGETHER randomised platform clinical trial (which had been published on October 27, 2021). The study suggested fluvoxamine was helpful in keeping people out of the hospital and in reducing deaths. I report once again that the study covered patients who had clearly been dealing with COVID-19 for at least seven days already (clear evidence of infection), and I note that the study hinted that using, for example, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin (after the seven-day limit) was not so effective. [Note: This document has passed along information that using hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin seems to be helpful, in essence, immediately upon discovery of infection, and it looks as if the study did not include using fluvoxamine in association with other materials, such as vitamin D and an antibiotic and whatever.]
On January 25, 2022, I put this section together, and while I was putting it together I got exposed to hearing Dr. Richard Erso as a guest on the nationally syndicated weekday radio show called The Charlie Kirk Show. Dr. Richard Erso made the point that COVID-19 is a virus, but Dr. Richard Erso pressed the issue that COVID-19 should be considered, really, an inflammation disease and a blood-clotting disease. I can report that, based on the radio show, more talk about anti-inflammatory care is needed. I originally planned to make this paragraph a part of this document to note only that, on January 24, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a statement--"CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Certain Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat COVID-19 Due to the Omicron Variant"--and the statement was attributed to Patrizia Cavazzonei, M.D., the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research unit. One part of the document was--"...Based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to account for more than 99% of cases in the United States...as of Jan 15. Therefore, it's highly unlikely that COVID-19 patients seeking care in the U.S. at this time are infected with a variant other than omicron, and these treatments [those related to (1) bamlanivimab and etesvimab and (2) REGEN-COV] are not authorized to be used at this time....". I dislike the idea of banning use. Why did not the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (or the FDA) simply report that it looks as if the two treatments seem to be ineffective at the moment with Omicron, given the U.S. Food and Drug Administration may not really have a good database about whether or not the treatments are working, and let doctors on the frontlines of care make the final decisions based on all that they might know, which could be beyond that of, in essence, the federal government, members of which have been wrong about COVID-19 and have been blocking care with therapeutics, as Joseph Biden has been in relation to monoclonal antibodies (as noted in this document previously)? Now I pass along information from an article entitled "Florida monoclonal antibody sites shut down after FDA decision. What happens now?" [Marchante, Michelle, and Daniel Chang. "Florida monoclonal antibody sites shut down after FDA decision. What happens now?." Miami Herald, 25 January 2022, 11:41 a.m..], and the information is--"...Florida monoclonal antibody sites have closed following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's announcement that Regeneron and Eli Lilly's treatments shouldn't be used because they don't work against the COVID omicron variant...." and "...Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other state officials, including Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, denounced the decision, saying the federal government hasn't proven the treatments are ineffective in a clinical setting...." and "...'Without a shred of clinical data to support this action, Biden has forced trained medical professionals to choose between treating their patients or breaking the law,' DeSantis said in a statement. 'This indefensible edict takes treatment out of the hands of medical professionals and will cost some Americans their lives. There are real-world implications to Biden's medical authoritarianism -- Americans' access to treatment is now subject to the whims of a failing president.'....". By the way, at the time of decision by the FDA, the southern border of the United States of America was not closed to illegal aliens and it looked as if Russia was poised to invade Ukraine, which made people remember Joseph Biden had left billions of dollars of U.S. military equipment in Afghanistan in the summer of 2021.
Between January 2020 (or so) and January 2022, governors of states In the United States of America imposed travel restrictions and such in relation to COVID-19 on the citizens of their states; for example, in early 2020, Michiganians who owned two residences in Michigan were not supposed to travel between the two residence under orders of Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who, in early 2020, would call out the medical community as racist against blacks through several public press conferences. On February 1, 2020, I learned that Johns Hopkins University had published a paper that talked about the value of "lockdowns" in relation to COVID-19. The document is A LITERATURE REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF LOCKDOWNS ON COVID-19 MORTALITY (SAE/No. 200/January 2022), which was written by Jonas Herby, Lars Jonung, and Steve H. Hanke, and the document is part of a series. One of the general statements that appears early in the document is--"...While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted....".
"Dr. Robert Malone: Boosters aren't protecting you from omicron." msn.com, 18 December 2021, 06:34.
"Most Omicron patients in South Africa recovering with simple easy treatment says Dr. Coetzee." The Times of India, 21 December 2021, 14:21 LST.
Ault, Alicia. "Bylor Gets Restraining Oder Against COVID Caccine Skeptic Doc." medscope.com, 16 September 2021.
Boak, Josh. "Omicron 'raging around the world'." Detroit Free Press, 20 December 2021, p. 7A.
Buckley, Eileen. "Judge orders hospital to treat COVID patient with experimental drug." wkbw.com, 18 January 2021, 6:27 p.m..
Bump, Philip. "Trump's promotion of hydroxychloroquine is almost certainly about politics, not profits." washingtonpost.com, 7 April 2020.
Chamberlain, Samuel. "Supreme Court liberal justices slammed over vax mandate statements." The New York Post, 7 January 2022, 7:51 p.m..
Fenton, Tom. "YouTube takes down antivax Joe Rogan interview with Dr. Robert Malone which likened vaccines to mass psychosis." independent.co.uk, 4 January 2022.
Frelick, Marcia. "Remove Sex From Pulic Birth Certificates, AMA Says." webmd.com, 16 June 2021.
Herbeck, Dan. "After judge orders hospital to use experimental Covid-19 treatment, woman recovers." buffalonews.com, 15 January 2021 (updated 17 August 2021).
Kessler, Glenn. "Sotomayor's false claim that 'over 100,000 children are in serious condition' with covid." The Washington Post, 8 January 2022, 3:45 p.m. EST.
Lavender, Paige. "FDA Warns Against Using Livestock Drug to Treat COVID-19." huffpost.com, 21 August 2021, 04:19 EDT.
Morris, Amanda. "When Three Shots Are Not Enough." The New York Times, 3 January 2022, 2:50 a.m..
Moye, Dave. "Joe Rogan Has COVID-19, Says He Took Ivermectin To Treat It." huffpost.com, 1 September 2021, 07:21 p.m. EDT (updated 2 September 2021).
Perrone, Matthew. "Pfizer pill becomes 1st US-authorized home COVID treatment." apnews.com, 22 December 2021.
Telegraph reporters. "Omicron symptoms: What they are and how the new Covid variant differs from previous strains." thetelegraph.com.uk, 22 December 2021, 11:57 a.m.
Tillman, Rachel. "AMA recommends removing sex designation on birth certificates from public view." ny1.com, 10 August 2021, 6:26 p.m..
Walter, Michael. "Cardiologist interviewed by Joe Rogan claims U.S. withheld early COVID-19 treatments to promote fear, push support for vaccines." cardiovascularbusiness.com, 17 December 2021.
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
The United States of America
Note: For further reading, see my document entitled A COVID-19/Coronavirus Story or The Communists and Socialists Once Again Did Their Thing--Kill People, which can be reached through this Virus link.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure:
The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be
reached at this link: Health.
To see information about the impeachment trial
of U.S. President Donald J. Trump, which shows
why Democrats have the minds of killers, click
on: Impeachment Trial.
For further reading, you should see the document
entitled Never Forget These Media Darlings ? --
A Guide for the Individual in the United
States of America, which can reached by
using this link: Media.
To go to the main page of The Hologlobe Press,
click on: www.hologlobepress.com.